收藏切换
Dual learning paradigms for AI-generated image detection and forensics: a survey
收藏切换
Jiaye Li1, 2, Minqing Zhang1, 2, *, Siyuan Huang1, 2, Pei Feng3, Lang Liu1, 2
Journal of Image and Graphics | 2026, 31(10) : 3523 - 3544
Less
收藏切换
Journal of Image and Graphics | 2026, 31(10): 3523-3544
• Review •
Dual learning paradigms for AI-generated image detection and forensics: a survey
Full
Jiaye Li1, 2, Minqing Zhang1, 2, *, Siyuan Huang1, 2, Pei Feng3, Lang Liu1, 2
Affiliations
  • 1 College of Cryptography Engineering,Engineering University of PAP,Xi’an 710086,China
  • 2 Key Laboratory of Network and Information Security Under the Chinese People's Armed Police Force (Engineering University of PAP),Xi’an 710086,China
  • 3 College of Equipment Management and Support,Engineering University of PAP,Xi’an 710086,China
Published: 2026-10-16 doi: 10.11834/jig.250624
Outline
收藏切换

AI-generated image detection technology aims to distinguish synthetic content from authentic imagery to safeguard media integrity and facilitate the subsequent forensic tasks further. In recent years,it has been a concern in the field of information security,especially in artificial intelligence-related industries such as judicial evidence verification,social media moderation,identity authentication,news broadcasting,and political security surveillance. Moreover,the growth of generative models has been promoting deep learning-based detection algorithms. In particular,the emergence of advanced techniques,such as the variational autoencoder,generative adversarial network,and denoising diffusion probabilistic model,has led to a qualitative leap in synthesis quality. However,a comprehensive review and analysis of state-of-the-art deep learning-based detection algorithms for different generative attacks are required to be realized to address the current theoretical fragmentation. Thus,we develop a systematic and critical review to explore the developments of AI-generated image detection in recent years. First,a comprehensive and systematic introduction of the detection field is presented from the following three aspects: 1) the evolution of forensic technology from handcrafted features to deep representations,2) the prevailing deepfake datasets,and 3) the common evaluation metrics. Then,more extensive qualitative experiments,quantitative experiments,and generalization evaluations of representative detection methods are conducted on the public datasets to compare their performance. Finally,the summary and challenges in the forensic community are highlighted. In particular,some prospects are recommended further in the field of digital forensics. First,from the perspective of learning paradigms,the existing image detection methods can be divided into two fundamental categories,i.e.,the disproof paradigm aimed at identifying falsity,and the truth-preserving paradigm aimed at modeling reality. Specifically,the disproof paradigm focuses on extracting specific forgery traces including frequency domain artifacts and spatial inconsistencies,while the truth-preserving paradigm targets the modeling of intrinsic real image distributions to detect anomalies. In addition,the domain of deep learning-based detection algorithms can be classified into the convolutional neural network-based fusion framework and vision transformer-based framework from the aspect of network architectures. The disproof-based framework achieves the feature extraction of manipulation signatures by supervised binary classification and accomplishes deep feature discrimination via learning distinguishable boundaries between real and fake domains. To clarify the transition of methodologies,the truth-preserving framework is originated from one-class classification and reconstruction principles. From the perspective of the supervision paradigm,the deep learning detection methods can also be categorized into three classes,i.e.,supervised learning,unsupervised learning,and self-supervised learning. The supervised methods leverage labeled synthetic data to guide the training processes,and the unsupervised approaches construct loss functions via constraining the similarity between the input and the learned manifold of natural images. The self-supervised algorithms are associated with the masked image modeling framework in common. Our critical review is focused on the main concepts and discussions of the characteristics of each method for different forensic scenarios from the perspectives of the network architecture and learning paradigm. First,we summarize the limitations of different algorithms,such as the generalization failure of disproof methods and the modeling complexity of truth-preserving methods,and provide some recommendations for further research. Second,we briefly introduce the popular public datasets such as FaceForensics++ and Wilddeepfake and provide the interfaces related to download them for each specific detection scenario. Then,we present the common evaluation metrics in the forensic field from two aspects: classification-based evaluation metrics and robustness-based metrics designed for cross-generator settings. The generic metrics can be utilized to evaluate the precision and sensitivity of algorithms of those are accuracy-based,error rate-based,receiver operating characteristic-based,and area under the curve-based metrics in total. Some of the generic metrics,such as accuracy (ACC),area under the curve (AUC),equal error rate (EER),and true positive rate (TPR),are also used for the quantitative assessment of generalization. The specific metrics designed for localization consist of pixel-level intersection over union and bounding box precision that employ the pixel-wise masks as the reference ground truth. Third,we present the qualitative and quantitative results,and average inference times of representative alternatives for various forensic missions. Finally,this review critically analyzes the conclusion,highlights the challenges in the detection community,and conducts forecasting analysis,such as cross-domain image detection,high-level semantic consistency-driven detection,antiforensic robust detection,real-time mobile detection,explainable forensics based on physical imaging principles,detection under extreme compression,and comprehensive evaluation benchmarks. The methods,datasets,and evaluation metrics mentioned are linked at https://github.com/qqqqwddw/wesome-image-Detection and https://www.scidb.cn/detail?dataSetId=d6427185d9ff4c43bb6b190a117d723b.

multimedia forensics  /  AI-generated image detection  /  deepfake  /  representation learning  /  anomaly detection  /  generalization performance
李佳业, 张敏情, 黄思远, 冯佩, 刘浪. 双学习范式AI生成图像检测取证技术综述. 中国图象图形学报, 2026 , 31 (10) : 3523 -3544 . DOI: 10.11834/jig.250624
Jiaye Li, Minqing Zhang, Siyuan Huang, Pei Feng, Lang Liu. Dual learning paradigms for AI-generated image detection and forensics: a survey[J]. Journal of Image and Graphics, 2026 , 31 (10) : 3523 -3544 . DOI: 10.11834/jig.250624
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62272478)
Year 2026 volume 31 Issue 10
33
15
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.11834/jig.250624
  • Receive Date:2025-12-18
  • Online Date:2026-10-30
  • Published:2026-10-16
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-12-18
  • Revised:2026-01-21
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China (62272478)
Affiliations
    1 College of Cryptography Engineering,Engineering University of PAP,Xi’an 710086,China
    2 Key Laboratory of Network and Information Security Under the Chinese People's Armed Police Force (Engineering University of PAP),Xi’an 710086,China
    3 College of Equipment Management and Support,Engineering University of PAP,Xi’an 710086,China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zgtxtxxb/EN/10.11834/jig.250624
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT