PDF
Full
Outline
Life-cycle cost (LCC) analysis of railway bridges can provide more reasonable data support for the selection of bridge design schemes. Taking a high-speed railway bridge as an example and in combination with the bridge span requirements, two design schemes were proposed: cable-stiffened continuous rigid-frame superstructure and an arch-stiffened continuous rigid-frame superstructure. Based on the budgetary estimate, the construction costs for both design schemes were calculated. Accounting for the uncertainties inherent in the time-variant performance degradation of cables, a time-variant model for the calculation of the failure probability of the cable and hanger system during bridge operation was established to determine the optimal timing for cable and hanger replacement. For maintenance activities such as cable replacement and arch rib painting, the operation and maintenance costs of the two design schemes were calculated and the influence of the time value of capital on the operation and maintenance costs was analyzed. Addressing the uncertainties present in both the cost data and the calculation model, the distribution ranges of the LCCs for the two design schemes were presented. The results indicate that the costs of inspection, maintenance, and reinforcement during bridge operation significantly impact life-cycle costs. The life-cycle cost analysis method proposed in this study can effectively predict the maintenance timing during the operation period, providing support for accurate estimation of life-cycle costs. In the process of life-cycle cost analysis, it is necessary to fully consider the uncertainties during construction and operation, as well as the time value of costs. For the bridge in the case, from the perspective of life-cycle costs, the cable-stiffened continuous rigid-frame bridge design scheme has greater advantages, offering a reference for the selection of design schemes for similar long-span railway bridges.
PDF
12
6
| 科 Family | 属数 Number of genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) | 属 Genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae | 2 | 11 | 5.26 | 鹅膏菌属 Amanita | 10 | 4.78 |
| 小菇科 Mycenaceae | 2 | 12 | 5.74 | 丝盖伞属 Inocybe | 5 | 2.39 |
| 多孔菌科 Polyporaceae | 8 | 14 | 6.70 | 蜡蘑属 Laccaria | 5 | 2.39 |
| 红菇科 Russulaceae | 3 | 23 | 11.00 | 小皮伞属 Marasmius | 6 | 2.87 |
| 小菇属 Mycena | 11 | 5.26 | ||||
| 光柄菇属 Pluteus | 5 | 2.39 | ||||
| 红菇属 Russula | 17 | 8.13 | ||||
| 栓菌属 Trametes | 5 | 2.39 |
关闭全屏
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
010-62199257
qkjq@cast.org.cn
Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House
