收藏切换
Risk assessment model for embankment slope failure in mining goafs
收藏切换
PDF
Bo ZHAO1, 2
China Safety Science Journal | 2026, 36(2) : 121 - 126
Less
收藏切换
China Safety Science Journal | 2026, 36(2): 121-126
Safety Technology and Engineering
Risk assessment model for embankment slope failure in mining goafs
Full
Bo ZHAO1, 2
Affiliations
  • 1College of Civil Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan Shanxi 030024, China
  • 2Technology Innovation Center for Risk Prevention and Control of Major Project Geosafety, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100083, China
Published: 2026-02-28 doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2026.02.0206
Outline
收藏切换

To address the challenges in accurately describing uncertainty and multiple failure modes in the risk assessment of embankment slope failures in goaf areas, a risk assessment model based on an improved T-S fuzzy fault tree approach was proposed. Initially, Gaussian fuzzy numbers were introduced to characterize the failure states and occurrence probabilities of basic events, thereby addressing the over-reliance on precise probabilistic data in conventional fault tree analysis and the insufficient representation of intermediate event states. Subsequently, T-S fuzzy model was employed to replace traditional AND/OR relationships in logic gates, capturing the uncertainty and fuzzy characteristics among events, and thereby deriving the failure probability of slope collapse. Finally, an engineering case study was conducted for validation. The results demonstrate that the proposed approach simplifies the fault tree construction, identifies the key risk factors leading to slope failure, provides a ranking of their influence, and reveal the intrinsic relationships between failure events and various factors.

mining goafs  /  embankment slopes  /  collapse  /  Takagi-Sugeno (T-S) fuzzy fault tree  /  gaussian fuzzy number  /  risk assessment
Bo ZHAO. Risk assessment model for embankment slope failure in mining goafs[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026 , 36 (2) : 121 -126 . DOI: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2026.02.0206
Year 2026 volume 36 Issue 2
PDF
63
19
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2026.02.0206
  • Receive Date:2025-10-20
  • Online Date:2026-07-08
  • Published:2026-02-28
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-10-20
  • Revised:2025-12-19
Funding
Affiliations
    1College of Civil Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan Shanxi 030024, China
    2Technology Innovation Center for Risk Prevention and Control of Major Project Geosafety, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100083, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zgaqkxxb/EN/10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2026.02.0206
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT