收藏切换
Effect evaluation and experimental validation of engineering blasting based on extension-analytic hierarchy process model
收藏切换
PDF
Suqian NI1, Ying XU1, 2, **, Rongzhou YANG1, Xiangyang YAO3, Yanwei YUAN4, Jinfu DING1
China Safety Science Journal | 2024, 34(12) : 129 - 139
Less
收藏切换
China Safety Science Journal | 2024, 34(12): 129-139
Safety engineering technology
Effect evaluation and experimental validation of engineering blasting based on extension-analytic hierarchy process model
Full
Suqian NI1, Ying XU1, 2, **, Rongzhou YANG1, Xiangyang YAO3, Yanwei YUAN4, Jinfu DING1
Affiliations
  • 1 School of Civil Engineering and Architecture,Anhui University of Science and Technology,Huainan Anhui 232001,China
  • 2 State Key Laboratory of Mining Response and Disaster Prevention and Control in Deep Coal Mines,Huainan Anhui 232001,China
  • 3 CAS Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and Design of Materials,University of Science and Technology of China,Hefei Anhui 230026,China
  • 4 School of Civil and Resource Engineering,University of Science and Technology Beijing,Beijing 100083,China
Published: 2024-12-28 doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.12.0509
Outline
收藏切换

In order to ensure the normal passage of vehicles and the safety of the existing tunnel support structure during the blasting through the highway,the evaluation method of engineering blasting effect based on extension-AHP model was proposed. Firstly,by means of investigation and analysis,the blasting effect rating standard and index system were established,and the model was applied to the evaluation of a water diversion project. Secondly,AHP was used to determine the weights of evaluation indexes,and the combined relevance degree of blasting rating was calculated. Finally,the results of the blasting effect rating were verified by acoustic detection test,blasting shock wave test and blasting seismic wave test. The study shows that the combined relevance degree Q j ( X - M ) is calculated by extension-AHP model. The blasting effect of the tunnel boring is Qmax=-0.017,and the evaluation grade is a good blasting effect. The surrounding rock loose circle of the tunnel is relatively small and evenly distributed. The influence range of the surrounding rock stability is about 0.5-0.6 m. The blasting energy does not cause the rock rupture zone to further extend the signs of the inward. The energy attenuation trend of blasting seismic waves is different under different wave frequencies. However,the attenuation rate is greater than that of low-frequency component energy in the overall performance of high-frequency component energy. In the same channel,with the increase of the distance between the blasting source and the measurement points,the overall vibration waveform becomes narrower. The main frequency increases first and then decreases,and the main frequency domain moves to the low-frequency direction. The overpressure peak attenuation characteristic of blasting shock wave meets PS=αl-γ. With the increase in the distance from the blasting sourceblasting shock wave overpressure attenuation coefficient is an increasing trend. The measurement range belongs to the shock wave attenuation zone. The shock wave overpressure peak of the tunnel entrance and the construction outside tend to converge.

extension-analytic hierarchy process(AHP) model  /  blasting effect evaluation  /  acoustic detection  /  blasting shock wave  /  blasting seismic wave
Suqian NI, Ying XU, Rongzhou YANG, Xiangyang YAO, Yanwei YUAN, Jinfu DING. Effect evaluation and experimental validation of engineering blasting based on extension-analytic hierarchy process model[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024 , 34 (12) : 129 -139 . DOI: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.12.0509
Year 2024 volume 34 Issue 12
PDF
342
141
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.12.0509
  • Receive Date:2024-07-17
  • Online Date:2025-07-09
  • Published:2024-12-28
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2024-07-17
  • Revised:2024-09-12
Funding
Affiliations
    1 School of Civil Engineering and Architecture,Anhui University of Science and Technology,Huainan Anhui 232001,China
    2 State Key Laboratory of Mining Response and Disaster Prevention and Control in Deep Coal Mines,Huainan Anhui 232001,China
    3 CAS Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and Design of Materials,University of Science and Technology of China,Hefei Anhui 230026,China
    4 School of Civil and Resource Engineering,University of Science and Technology Beijing,Beijing 100083,China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zgaqkxxb/EN/10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.12.0509
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT