收藏切换
Safety analysis of aero-engine thrust reverser system based on STPA-MBSA
收藏切换
PDF
Guosong Xiao1, 2, Hao Tang3, Lei Dong1, 2, Jie Bai**, 1, 2
China Safety Science Journal | 2026, 36(4) : 103 - 113
Less
收藏切换
China Safety Science Journal | 2026, 36(4): 103-113
Safety Technology and Engineering
Safety analysis of aero-engine thrust reverser system based on STPA-MBSA
Full
Guosong Xiao1, 2, Hao Tang3, Lei Dong1, 2, Jie Bai**, 1, 2
Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory of Civil Aircraft Airworthiness Technology, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China
  • 2Science and Technology Innovation Research Institute, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China
  • 3College of Safety Science and Engineering, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China
Published: 2026-04-28 doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2026.04.0636
Outline
收藏切换

TRS is a safety-critical aero-engine system. In response to the inadequacies of conventional safety analysis techniques in addressing the complexities associated with multilevel coupling and cross-linking of multiple systems concerning system interaction and closed-loop design specifications, this study proposes a method that integrates STPA and MBSA. By establishing a whole-process analysis framework from system requirement capture to verification, an overall system model was constructed through the use of SysML to reveal the architectural principles. The STPA method was employed to define 4 types of system-level losses (accidents) and 8 types of system-level hazards, construct a TRS feedback control structure model, identify 11 unsafe control actions (UCAs), derive causal scenarios, and assign respective safety levels. Using the model checking tool new symbolic model verifier (NuSMV), fault and nominal models were constructed to verify critical system safety properties. The results demonstrate that the proposed model possesses logical integrity and correctness, and indicate that the probability of "Thrust Reverser Non-Command Open in Air," as determined from minimal cut set, is 1.95×10-10 per flight hour, thereby meeting the safety requirement of a failure probability of less than 10-9 per flight hour.

aero-engine  /  systems-theoretic process analysis(STPA)  /  model based safety analysis(MBSA)  /  thrust reverser system(TRS)  /  safety analysis  /  systems modeling language(SysML)
Guosong Xiao, Hao Tang, Lei Dong, Jie Bai. Safety analysis of aero-engine thrust reverser system based on STPA-MBSA[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026 , 36 (4) : 103 -113 . DOI: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2026.04.0636
Year 2026 volume 36 Issue 4
PDF
127
4
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2026.04.0636
  • Receive Date:2025-11-07
  • Online Date:2026-07-08
  • Published:2026-04-28
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-11-07
  • Revised:2026-02-04
Affiliations
    1Key Laboratory of Civil Aircraft Airworthiness Technology, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China
    2Science and Technology Innovation Research Institute, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China
    3College of Safety Science and Engineering, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zgaqkxxb/EN/10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2026.04.0636
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT