收藏切换
Review of design and evaluation of visual guiding devices for highway tunnels
收藏切换
PDF
Jialin MEI1, 2, Zhigang DU1, 2, Zhihao QIAN3, Fangtong JIAO4
China Safety Science Journal | 2025, 35(10) : 124 - 130
Less
收藏切换
China Safety Science Journal | 2025, 35(10): 124-130
Safety engineering technology
Review of design and evaluation of visual guiding devices for highway tunnels
Full
Jialin MEI1, 2, Zhigang DU1, 2, Zhihao QIAN3, Fangtong JIAO4
Affiliations
  • 1School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan Hubei 430063, China
  • 2Engineering Research Center of the Ministry of Transportation Information and Safety Education, Wuhan Hubei 430063, China
  • 3Zhejiang Luguang Technology Co., Ltd., Jinhua Zhejiang 321000, China
  • 4School of Transportation and Vehicle Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo Shandong 255000, China
Published: 2025-10-28 doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2025.10.1193
Outline
收藏切换

In order to enhance driving safety in highway tunnels and to reduce visual distraction and burden caused by improperly designed visual guiding devices, a research framework for the design and evaluation of tunnel visual guiding devices was proposed. A systematic review of domestic and international literature has been conducted to analyze the effectiveness and design parameters of various types of visual guiding devices, and to clarify their key functions in delineating spatial right-of-way, ensuring adequate sight distance, and enhancing visual comfort. In addition, current studies were reviewed to summarize data acquisition methods and core evaluation indicators, thereby constructing a scientific evaluation system. The limitations of existing research were also identified, and future research directions were proposed. The results show that visual guiding devices can optimize the tunnel visual environment by clarifying spatial right-of-way, increasing effective sight distance and visual fields, and mitigating visual illusions. The type and spacing of devices should be determined based on spatial right-of-way, curvature perception, speed perception, and visual comfort. Real-vehicle experiments and indoor simulations serve as key approaches for exploring design parameters and optimization strategies, while field observations and accident data analysis can further validate their effectiveness. Indicators such as visual perception, visual characteristics, physiological responses, and driving behavior are suggested as core evaluation metrics. Moreover, multi-indicator interaction analysis may help reveal the mechanisms by which visual guiding devices influence driver behavior.

highway tunnels  /  visual guiding devices  /  device design  /  evaluation system  /  driving safety
Jialin MEI, Zhigang DU, Zhihao QIAN, Fangtong JIAO. Review of design and evaluation of visual guiding devices for highway tunnels[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025 , 35 (10) : 124 -130 . DOI: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2025.10.1193
Year 2025 volume 35 Issue 10
PDF
59
8
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2025.10.1193
  • Receive Date:2025-06-11
  • Online Date:2026-07-09
  • Published:2025-10-28
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-06-11
  • Revised:2025-08-18
Funding
Affiliations
    1School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan Hubei 430063, China
    2Engineering Research Center of the Ministry of Transportation Information and Safety Education, Wuhan Hubei 430063, China
    3Zhejiang Luguang Technology Co., Ltd., Jinhua Zhejiang 321000, China
    4School of Transportation and Vehicle Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo Shandong 255000, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zgaqkxxb/EN/10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2025.10.1193
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT