收藏切换
Quality difference evaluation of Hedychium flavum from different origins based on multi-index quantitation and chemometrics combined with CRITIC-TOPSIS method
收藏切换
PDF
Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs | 2026, 57(14) : 5667 - 5676
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs | 2026, 57(14): 5667-5676
Quality difference evaluation of Hedychium flavum from different origins based on multi-index quantitation and chemometrics combined with CRITIC-TOPSIS method
Full
ZHANG Liqun, FENG Kai, LI Yiran, LIU Yun, XU Hong
Affiliations
doi: 10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2026.14.026
Outline
收藏切换
Objective To evaluate the quality difference evaluation of Hedychium flavum from different origins based on multi-index content determination, using principal component analysis (PCA), orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and CRITIC-TOPSIS methods, so as to provide a basis for further development and utilization. Methods HPLC was used with BetaMax Neutral C18 column, acetonitrile -0.4%phosphoric acid solution as mobile phase with gradient elution, detection wavelength of 320, 230, 360 and 210 nm. A total of 17 batches of H. flavum from different origins were collected. The contents of 13 chemical constituents including protocatechuic acid, trans-4-hydroxycinnamic acid, coniferaldehyde, isocoronarin D, coronarin D, coronarin A, coronarin E, quercetin, kaempferol, isorhamnetin, daucosterol, stigmasterol, β-sitosterol were detected, while extractives and total ash were examined. The 17 batches of H. flavum were grouped using PCA and PLS-DA methods, and quality differential markers were screened out. The weights of each index was calculated using the CRITIC method, and a comprehensive quality evaluation model for H. flavum was constructed using the TOPSIS method. Results The contents of the above 13 indexes among 17 batches of H. flavum were 0.121—0.295, 0.044—0.091, 0.036—0.104, 0.400—1.071, 0.300—0.515, 0.902—1.677, 0.089—0.153, 0.473—0.916, 0.177—0.378, 0.136—0.249, 0.068—0.117, 0.223—0.453, 0.240—0.863 mg/g, while the ranges of extractives and total ash were 11.4%—21.5% and 3.1%—9.2 %, respectively. PCA results showed that the cumulative variance contribution rate of two principal components was 87.564%, and 17 batches of H. flavum were divided into three categories. Kaempferol, coronarin A, protocatechuic acid, extractives, β-sitosterol, isocoronarin D and quercetin were selected as quality differential markers by PLS-DA methods. The results of CRITIC-TOPSIS method showed that the comprehensive relative proximities of 17 batches of H. flavum samples was 0.421 6—0.618 1. The quality of samples from Guizhou and Sichuan provinces exhibited superior comprehensive quality. Conclusion The established multi-index quantitative combined with PCA, PLS-DA and CRITIC-TOPSIS method can comprehensively evaluate the quality difference of H. flavum from different habitats. The method is scientific, intuitive, accurate and reliable, which can provide a theoretical and technical reference for the quality difference evaluation of H. flavum.
Hedychium flavum Roxb.  /  HPLC  /  PCA  /  PLS-DA  /  CRITIC-TOPSIS  /  quality difference evaluation  /  protocatechuic acid  /  trans-4-hydroxycinnamic acid  /  coniferaldehyde  /  isocoronarin D  /  coronarin D  /  coronarin A  /  coronarin E  /  quercetin  /  kaempferol  /  isorhamnetin  /  daucosterol  /  stigmasterol  /  β-sitosterol
ZHANG Liqun, FENG Kai, LI Yiran, LIU Yun, XU Hong. Quality difference evaluation of Hedychium flavum from different origins based on multi-index quantitation and chemometrics combined with CRITIC-TOPSIS method[J]. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, 2026 , 57 (14) : 5667 -5676 . DOI: 10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2026.14.026
Year 2026 volume 57 Issue 14
PDF
27
6
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2026.14.026
  • Receive Date:2026-01-09
  • Online Date:2026-09-10
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2026-01-09
Affiliations
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zcy/EN/10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2026.14.026
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT