收藏切换
Quality evaluation of Angelicae Sinensis Radix before and after wine processing based on HPLC fingerprints combined with chemical pattern recognition and multi-component quantification
收藏切换
PDF
ZHAO Meixi, YAO Xuelian, YANG Ming, ZHU Jing, LU Tulin, GUAN Yongmei, LAN Zhihui, LIU Leling, ZHAO Zibo, ZANG Zhenzhong
Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs | 2026, 57(1) : 64 - 72
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs | 2026, 57(1): 64-72
Quality evaluation of Angelicae Sinensis Radix before and after wine processing based on HPLC fingerprints combined with chemical pattern recognition and multi-component quantification
Full
ZHAO Meixi, YAO Xuelian, YANG Ming, ZHU Jing, LU Tulin, GUAN Yongmei, LAN Zhihui, LIU Leling, ZHAO Zibo, ZANG Zhenzhong
Affiliations
doi: 10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2026.01.008
Outline
收藏切换
Objective To establish HPLC fingerprint profiles of raw Dɑnggui (Angelicae Sinensis Radix, ASR) and ASR processed with wine, and to study the changes in chemical components before and after wine processing by combining multivariate statistical analysis and quantitative determination, providing a reference for the quality evaluation of ASR. Methods HPLC was used to establish the fingerprint profiles of raw ASR and ASR processed with wine, and the contents of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF), chlorogenic acid, vanillin, ferulic acid, and ligustilide were determined. The similarity of the profiles was calculated using the Chinese herbal medicine chromatographic fingerprint similarity evaluation system. Common peaks were calibrated, identified, and assigned.. The peak areas of the common peaks before and after wine processing were used as indicators. Hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA), principal component analysis (PCA), and orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) were employed to evaluate the intrinsic quality differences between raw and wine-processed ASR and identify the main differential components. Results HPLC fingerprint profiles of ten batches of raw ASR and ASR processed with wine were established. A total of 11 common peaks were identified in raw ASR and 12 common peaks were calibrated in ASR processed with wine. The similarity of the profiles was greater than 0.960. Chemical pattern recognition indicated that peaks 12 (ligustilide), 7, 11, and 6 (ferulic acid) might be the markers of the quality differences before and after wine processing. The content determination results showed that 5-HMF was newly generated after wine processing, while the contents of ferulic acid, chlorogenic acid, and vanillin slightly decreased, and the content of ligustilide increased. Conclusion The established fingerprint profiles and multi-component quantitative determination methods for ASR before and after wine processing are stable and reliable, providing a reference for the quality control, comprehensive utilization, and clinical application of ASR and ASR processed with wine.
Angelicae Sinensis Radix  /  Angelicae Sinensis Radix processed with wine  /  HPLC  /  fingerprint  /  chemometrics  /  5-hydroxymethylfurfural  /  chlorogenic acid  /  vanillin  /  ferulic acid  /  ligustilide  /  quality evaluation  /  hierarchical cluster analysis  /  principal component analysis  /  orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis
ZHAO Meixi, YAO Xuelian, YANG Ming, ZHU Jing, LU Tulin, GUAN Yongmei, LAN Zhihui, LIU Leling, ZHAO Zibo, ZANG Zhenzhong. Quality evaluation of Angelicae Sinensis Radix before and after wine processing based on HPLC fingerprints combined with chemical pattern recognition and multi-component quantification[J]. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, 2026 , 57 (1) : 64 -72 . DOI: 10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2026.01.008
Year 2026 volume 57 Issue 1
PDF
21
7
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2026.01.008
  • Receive Date:2025-09-18
  • Online Date:2026-09-09
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-09-18
Affiliations
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zcy/EN/10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2026.01.008
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT