收藏切换
Comparative study on international patent layout and technological competition trends of traditional Chinese medicine: An empirical analysis based on five countries
收藏切换
PDF
Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs | 2026, 57(15) : 5982 - 5998
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs | 2026, 57(15): 5982-5998
Comparative study on international patent layout and technological competition trends of traditional Chinese medicine: An empirical analysis based on five countries
Full
ZHANG Xinyuan, HANG Huojian, GUO Bochi, WU Lingyan, TENG Shuangshuang, SHU Yachun
Affiliations
doi: 10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2026.15.017
Outline
收藏切换
Objective This study aims to systematically analyze the intellectual property landscape of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) globally, with a focus on comparing the patent layout characteristics and competitive dynamics in five key countries: China, the United States, Japan, South Korea, and Germany. The goal is to provide strategic references for promoting the high-quality development and internationalization of China's TCM industry. Methods Leveraging the Patyee database, this research retrieved and obtained TCM-related patent data globally and from the aforementioned five countries. Employing a combination of quantitative and qualitative analysis methods, an in-depth examination was conducted from multiple dimensions, including patent application trends, geographical distribution, applicant types, core technological topics, and international layout strategies. Results The research findings indicate that despite a vast number of domestic TCM patent applications (approximately 360 000), the proportion of international applications filed via the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) is relatively low (only 1.37%), revealing a significant deficiency in overseas layout. Regarding the distribution of technological topics, patents related to TCM quality control and standardization technologies are relatively scarce globally (including in China), leaving a gap in meeting the high standards of quality controllability required for modern industrialization and internationalization. In terms of applicant types, 44% of TCM patents in China are held by individuals, while enterprises account for only 34%, reflecting a pattern of individual-led inheritance with enterprise-driven R&D yet to be enhanced. In contrast, TCM-related patent activities in the United States, Japan, and Germany are predominantly driven by multinational pharmaceutical companies or consumer goods giants with complete industrial chains. Conclusion To achieve high-quality internationalization of TCM intellectual property, China urgently needs to establish a systematic overseas patent layout strategy, forming a patent protection system covering the entire industrial chain of R&D, quality control, production, and marketing. The core task is to transform domestic technological advantages into internationally recognized technical standards and to promote the transformation of TCM from a traditional empirical model to a modern, evidence-based innovation paradigm by strengthening collaborative innovation among industry, academia, research, and users.
traditional Chinese medicine  /  intellectual property  /  internationalization  /  patent analysis  /  visualization
ZHANG Xinyuan, HANG Huojian, GUO Bochi, WU Lingyan, TENG Shuangshuang, SHU Yachun. Comparative study on international patent layout and technological competition trends of traditional Chinese medicine: An empirical analysis based on five countries[J]. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, 2026 , 57 (15) : 5982 -5998 . DOI: 10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2026.15.017
Year 2026 volume 57 Issue 15
PDF
33
9
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2026.15.017
  • Receive Date:2026-02-03
  • Online Date:2026-09-09
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2026-02-03
Affiliations
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zcy/EN/10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2026.15.017
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT