收藏切换
HPLC fingerprint chromatogram and quantity-quality transmitting rule of benchmark samples of classical prescription Guizhi Gancao Decoction
收藏切换
PDF
Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs | 2026, 57(6) : 2109 - 2119
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs | 2026, 57(6): 2109-2119
HPLC fingerprint chromatogram and quantity-quality transmitting rule of benchmark samples of classical prescription Guizhi Gancao Decoction
Full
CHEN Jiahao, WANG He, YAN Wenke, DONG Jiaqi, LIAN Nana, ZOU Junbo, SHI Yajun, LUAN Fei
Affiliations
doi: 10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2026.06.010
Outline
收藏切换
Objective The HPLC fingerprint and the content determination method of the benchmark sample of Guizhi Gancao Decoction (GGD, 桂枝甘草汤) were established to study the rule of quantity-quality transmitting of GGD benchmark samples. Methods According to the method recorded in “Treatise on Febrile Diseases”, 15 batches of GGD benchmark samples were prepared and the HPLC fingerprint of 15 batches of benchmark samples was established. The peak attribution and similarity range in the fingerprint were clarified, and the quantity-quality transfer indexes such as the range of extract yield, the content range of index components and the range of transfer rate were analyzed. The quality control system for GGD benchmark samples was preliminarily established. Results A total of 40 common peaks were identified in the 15 batches of GGD benchmark samples, which with good similarity (> 0.99). The contents of protocatechuic acid, liquiritin, coumarin, cinnamyl alcohol, liquiritigenin, cinnamic acid, cinnamaldehyde, and glycyrrhizic acid in the benchmark sample were 0.080—0.087, 0.863—1.055, 0.431—0.560, 0.167—0.227, 0.087—0.127, 0.423—0.492, 0.160—0.199, and 2.437—2.904 mg/g, respectively. The transfer rates of the eight index components from decoction pieces to water decoction were 44.35%—54.84%, 40.56%—44.44%, 48.82%—56.00%, 22.84%—52.61%, 25.70%—30.02%, 33.75%—37.83%, 23.42%—28.98%, and 62.09%—65.13%, respectively. The transfer rates from the water decoction to the reference sample were 67.99%—84.39%, 62.15%—67.93%, 59.42%—74.22%, 76.20%—85.64%, 51.31%—60.73%, 78.80%—85.17%, 16.27%—22.19%, and 71.82%—76.58%, respectively. Overall, the transfer rates of components from decoction pieces to water decoction were relatively low, while the transfer rates of most components increased during the subsequent concentration and freeze-drying processes. Only cinnamaldehyde showed a significant loss during freeze-drying. The dry paste yield of the reference sample was stable, with an average transfer rate of 77.71 %. Conclusion Through the HPLC fingerprint of GGD benchmark samples and the quantity-quality transfer patterns of its active components, a preliminary quality control system based on index components was established. This provides a scientific basis for the standardization and quality consistency evaluation of GGD classical prescription preparations.
classical formula  /  Guizhi Gancao Decoction  /  fingerprints  /  quantity-quality transfer  /  benchmark samples  /  protocatechuic acid  /  liquiritin  /  coumarin  /  cinnamyl alcohol  /  liquiritigenin  /  cinnamic acid  /  cinnamaldehyde  /  glycyrrhizic acid
CHEN Jiahao, WANG He, YAN Wenke, DONG Jiaqi, LIAN Nana, ZOU Junbo, SHI Yajun, LUAN Fei. HPLC fingerprint chromatogram and quantity-quality transmitting rule of benchmark samples of classical prescription Guizhi Gancao Decoction[J]. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, 2026 , 57 (6) : 2109 -2119 . DOI: 10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2026.06.010
Year 2026 volume 57 Issue 6
PDF
34
12
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2026.06.010
  • Receive Date:2025-10-24
  • Online Date:2026-09-09
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-10-24
Affiliations
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zcy/EN/10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2026.06.010
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT