收藏切换
Comparative study on compressive buckling performance and overall formability of ellipsoidal heads with different internal ribs
收藏切换
Guoqi YU1, 2, Rui LI1, 2, Tao ZHAO3, Jiuzhi DONG1, 2, Yunjun CHEN1, 2, Hongrui ZHANG4
Pressure Vessel Technology | 2026, 43(3) : 1 - 14
Less
收藏切换
Pressure Vessel Technology | 2026, 43(3): 1-14
• Experimental Researches •
Comparative study on compressive buckling performance and overall formability of ellipsoidal heads with different internal ribs
Full
Guoqi YU1, 2, Rui LI1, 2, Tao ZHAO3, Jiuzhi DONG1, 2, Yunjun CHEN1, 2, Hongrui ZHANG4
Affiliations
  • 1School of Mechanical Engineering,Tiangong University,Tianjin 300387,China
  • 2Tianjin Key Laboratory of Advanced Mechatronics Equipment Technology,Tiangong University,Tianjin 300387,China
  • 3Shanghai Spaceflight Precision Machinery Institute,Shanghai 201600,China
  • 4Xi'an Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics of CAS,Xi'an 710072,China
Published: 2026-03-30 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4837.2026.03.001
Outline
收藏切换

To meet the lightweight requirements of deep‑sea vehicles and address the issues of high residual stress and poor reliability associated with traditional welded internal ribbed heads,a new configuration of spiral‑ribbed ellipsoidal head suitable for integrated manufacturing is proposed.Through axial compression tests and finite element simulations,the compressive and buckling performance of four types of 6061-T6 aluminum alloy heads,namely without ribs,with transverse ribs,with longitudinal ribs,and with spiral ribs,was systematically compared.The overall formability was verified by spinning simulation and trial production.The results show that the structure with longitudinal internal ribs exhibits the best mechanical performance,with its ultimate compressive strength and critical buckling pressure increased by 8.7% and 5%,respectively,compared to the structure without ribs.The structure with spiral internal ribs,while maintaining good mechanical performance,can achieve overall forming with non‑deformed internal ribs and high filling quality by means of the spinning process.In contrast,structures with transverse internal ribs and longitudinal internal ribs are prone to forming defects.The structure with longitudinal internal ribs has the most outstanding load‑bearing capacity,while the structure with spiral internal ribs has a significant advantage in integrated forming,balancing mechanical performance and forming feasibility.This study provides new ideas for high‑performance design and integrated manufacturing of pressure components for deep‑sea equipment.

ellipsoidal head  /  internal rib  /  compression analysis  /  buckling analysis  /  spinning forming
余国旗, 李锐, 赵淘, 董九志, 陈云军, 张洪瑞. 不同内筋椭球封头抗压屈曲性能及整体成形对比研究. 压力容器, 2026 , 43 (3) : 1 -14 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4837.2026.03.001
Guoqi YU, Rui LI, Tao ZHAO, Jiuzhi DONG, Yunjun CHEN, Hongrui ZHANG. Comparative study on compressive buckling performance and overall formability of ellipsoidal heads with different internal ribs[J]. Pressure Vessel Technology, 2026 , 43 (3) : 1 -14 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4837.2026.03.001
Year 2026 volume 43 Issue 3
155
73
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4837.2026.03.001
  • Receive Date:2026-01-04
  • Online Date:2026-10-23
  • Published:2026-03-30
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2026-01-04
  • Revised:2026-02-13
Affiliations
    1School of Mechanical Engineering,Tiangong University,Tianjin 300387,China
    2Tianjin Key Laboratory of Advanced Mechatronics Equipment Technology,Tiangong University,Tianjin 300387,China
    3Shanghai Spaceflight Precision Machinery Institute,Shanghai 201600,China
    4Xi'an Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics of CAS,Xi'an 710072,China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ylrq/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1001-4837.2026.03.001
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT