收藏切换
Lithology Identification Comparison on Geophysical Logging Data of In-situ Leaching Uranium Based on Multiple Machine Learning Algorithms
收藏切换
PDF
Yuhan ZOU1, Qinci LI1, 2, Weimin QUE1, 2, Liang HUANG3, Tongpan WU4, Zhiming DU1, 2, Zhenjiao JIANG3, Xuanyi CHEN3
Uranium Mining and Metallurgy | 2025, 44(2) : 9 - 17
Less
收藏切换
Uranium Mining and Metallurgy | 2025, 44(2): 9-17
MINING AND HYDROMETALLURGY
Lithology Identification Comparison on Geophysical Logging Data of In-situ Leaching Uranium Based on Multiple Machine Learning Algorithms
Full
Yuhan ZOU1, Qinci LI1, 2, Weimin QUE1, 2, Liang HUANG3, Tongpan WU4, Zhiming DU1, 2, Zhenjiao JIANG3, Xuanyi CHEN3
Affiliations
  • 1 Beijing Research Institute of Chemical Engineering and Metallurgy, CNNC, Beijing 101149, China
  • 2 China Nuclear Mining Science and Technology Corporation, CNNC, Beijing 101149, China
  • 3 Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment, Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun 130015, China
  • 4 College of Resources, Environment and Safety Engineering, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China
Published: 2025-05-20 doi: 10.13426/j.cnki.yky.2024.10.09
Outline
收藏切换

Machine learning algorithms can automatically learn and extract features from a large amount of geological data to achieve fast and accurate lithology identification. In this paper, the logging data of several wells in a sandstone-type uranium deposit in Inner Mongolia were randomly divided into training sets and verification sets according to the ratio of 7∶2. The model structure was adjusted and the hyperparameters were optimized for training. BC1401, BC2802, BC4603 and BC7206 well were used for testing to realize the comparative analysis of 5 kinds of models, such as random forest, XGBoost, K value proximity algorithm, BP neural network and SMOTE-LSTM algorithm. The results show that SMOTE-LSTM model has the most superior stability and accuracy, with an accuracy of 84.6%.

in-situ leaching of uranium  /  machine learning  /  sandstone-type uranium deposit  /  lithology identification  /  logging data  /  SMOTE-LSTM model  /  XGBoost model
Yuhan ZOU, Qinci LI, Weimin QUE, Liang HUANG, Tongpan WU, Zhiming DU, Zhenjiao JIANG, Xuanyi CHEN. Lithology Identification Comparison on Geophysical Logging Data of In-situ Leaching Uranium Based on Multiple Machine Learning Algorithms[J]. Uranium Mining and Metallurgy, 2025 , 44 (2) : 9 -17 . DOI: 10.13426/j.cnki.yky.2024.10.09
Year 2025 volume 44 Issue 2
PDF
267
99
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.13426/j.cnki.yky.2024.10.09
  • Receive Date:2024-10-18
  • Online Date:2025-07-04
  • Published:2025-05-20
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2024-10-18
Funding
Affiliations
    1 Beijing Research Institute of Chemical Engineering and Metallurgy, CNNC, Beijing 101149, China
    2 China Nuclear Mining Science and Technology Corporation, CNNC, Beijing 101149, China
    3 Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment, Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun 130015, China
    4 College of Resources, Environment and Safety Engineering, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/yky/EN/10.13426/j.cnki.yky.2024.10.09
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT