收藏切换
Three-Dimensional Susceptibility Structure Analysis of the Gufang-Yangying Area in the Southeast of Fengning, Hebei
收藏切换
Tao CHEN1, 2, Ying RAO1, 2, *, Jingli LIANG3, 4, Hongfang ZHOU3, Peng WANG3, 4, Zhanxiang HE5
Northwestern Geology | 2026, 59(2) : 280 - 289
Less
收藏切换
Northwestern Geology | 2026, 59(2): 280-289
Three-Dimensional Susceptibility Structure Analysis of the Gufang-Yangying Area in the Southeast of Fengning, Hebei
Full
Tao CHEN1, 2, Ying RAO1, 2, *, Jingli LIANG3, 4, Hongfang ZHOU3, Peng WANG3, 4, Zhanxiang HE5
Affiliations
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
  • 2College of Geophysics, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
  • 3Hebei Huakan Resource Environmental Survey Co., Ltd., Chengde 067000, Hebei, China
  • 4Hebei Key Laboratory of Geological Resources Exploration and Ecological Protection, Chengde 067000, Hebei, China
  • 5Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, China
Published: 2026-04-20 doi: 10.12401/j.nwg.2025161
Outline
收藏切换

The Gufang-Yangying area in the southeast of Fengning Manchu Autonomous County, Hebei Province, is located at the northern margin of the North China Craton, tectonically situated at the junction between the northern margin uplift belt of the North China Craton and the Chengde North Basin of the Yanshan-Liaoxi rift zone, adjacent to the Shangyi-Longhua regional fault. The area is dominated by metamorphic rock series of the Neoarchean Upper Chongli Group (Yangying and Aijiagou formations), with complex structures, well-developed folds, and iron deposits primarily consisting of sedimentary-metamorphic iron ore and ultra-poor magnetite, generally positioned along northeast-trending tight synclinal structures. Although previous geophysical surveys have been conducted, large-scale high-precision ground magnetic measurements remain insufficient, resulting in inadequate delineation of three-dimensional deep ore body structures and constraining deep prospecting efforts. This study, based on 1∶5000 high-precision ground magnetic survey data, employs reduction to pole, variable-height upward continuation, field separation, analytical signal, vertical derivative, and tilt derivative processing, combined with rock physical property statistics, and utilizes the open-source SimPEG framework for three-dimensional magnetic susceptibility inversion to reveal the spatial distribution characteristics of magnetic bodies within a 1 km depth range; rock physical properties indicate significant magnetic contrast between mineralized iron-bearing rocks and host rocks, providing a robust foundation for magnetic exploration. Inversion results show that magnetic bodies are distributed in a northeast-southwest trending strip-like pattern, mainly concentrated in the central-eastern and southwestern parts, highly consistent with known surface ore bodies and the Upper Chongli Group metamorphic series; vertically, they exhibit scattered distribution in shallow depths, concentrated and continuous in middle depths, and rapid weakening in deeper levels, with three-dimensional displays at different susceptibility thresholds further confirming that high-susceptibility zones are predominantly in the central-eastern part, forming large lens-shaped bodies that partially extend close to the surface, reflecting progressive thickening and enlargement of ore bodies along dip directions. The study confirms that sedimentary-metamorphic iron deposits in the area are controlled by Neoarchean regional metamorphism, conforming to the typical BIF-type metallogenic model at the northern margin of the North China Craton; high-precision three-dimensional susceptibility inversion effectively addresses the knowledge gap in deep structures under complex geological conditions, providing high-resolution geophysical evidence for precise localization of concealed ore bodies, with the central-eastern high-susceptibility zone representing the most favorable target for deep prospecting and warranting priority for drilling verification. These findings deepen understanding of deep metallogenic elements in the study area and offer reliable technical approaches and integrated geological-geophysical methodologies for deep prediction in similar sedimentary-metamorphic iron ore districts along the northern margin of the North China Craton.

sedimentary-metamorphic iron ore  /  three-dimensional susceptibility structure  /  inversion  /  Yangying iron ore  /  Gufang-Yangying  /  north margin of the North China Craton
陈涛, 饶莹, 梁景利, 周红芳, 王鹏, 何展翔. 河北丰宁东南部古房–杨营三维磁性结构分析. 西北地质, 2026 , 59 (2) : 280 -289 . DOI: 10.12401/j.nwg.2025161
Tao CHEN, Ying RAO, Jingli LIANG, Hongfang ZHOU, Peng WANG, Zhanxiang HE. Three-Dimensional Susceptibility Structure Analysis of the Gufang-Yangying Area in the Southeast of Fengning, Hebei[J]. Northwestern Geology, 2026 , 59 (2) : 280 -289 . DOI: 10.12401/j.nwg.2025161
Year 2026 volume 59 Issue 2
156
79
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.12401/j.nwg.2025161
  • Receive Date:2025-11-11
  • Online Date:2026-09-16
  • Published:2026-04-20
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-11-11
  • Revised:2026-01-04
  • Accepted:2026-01-21
Affiliations
    1State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
    2College of Geophysics, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
    3Hebei Huakan Resource Environmental Survey Co., Ltd., Chengde 067000, Hebei, China
    4Hebei Key Laboratory of Geological Resources Exploration and Ecological Protection, Chengde 067000, Hebei, China
    5Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/xbdz/EN/10.12401/j.nwg.2025161
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT