Objective To develop a fluorescence method for Vibrio parahaemolyticus detection by the combination of CRISPR system and the hybridization chain reaction (HCR), thus achieving rapid, sensitive, and accurate detection of the pathogen. Methods Cascade probe (RP/I) and HCR hairpin structures were first designed according to a specific conserved sequences screened from V. parahaemolyticus. Subsequently, the feasibility, specificity, and sensitivity of the method were evaluated after the optimization of reaction conditions. Furthermore, V. parahaemolyticus-contaminated aquatic products were used to validate the interference resistance of the method. Results The cleavage of CRISPR/Cas13a was activated upon binding to the target RNA (T-RNA), leading to the trans-cleavage of the RP/I cascade probe and the release of I strand. Then, the released I strand subsequently triggered HCR, generating a significant fluorescence signal for target detection. The established method successfully distinguished target sequences with single-base, double-base, and triple-base mismatches and enabled the specific identification of V. parahaemolyticus against other non-target bacteria, including V. alginolyticus, V. vulnificus, V. harveyi, V. cholerae, and Escherichia coli, demonstrating excellent specificity. The assay showed a good linear correlation over a T-RNA concentration range of 25 pmol/L to 10 nmol/L. The corresponding linear regression equation was y=7 236.75×lg CT-RNA-8 590.11 (R2=0.99, C represents the T-RNA concentration and y represents the fluorescence intensity), with the LOD of 1.01 pmol/L. The proposed method enabled rapid detection of RNA extracted from V. parahaemolyticus in various aquatic products, yielding results consistent with those obtained by RT-qPCR. Conclusion The fluorescence method based on CRISPR/Cas13a-HCR established in this study realizes rapid detection of V. parahaemolyticus, demonstrating good sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.
| 科 Family | 属数 Number of genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) | 属 Genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae | 2 | 11 | 5.26 | 鹅膏菌属 Amanita | 10 | 4.78 |
| 小菇科 Mycenaceae | 2 | 12 | 5.74 | 丝盖伞属 Inocybe | 5 | 2.39 |
| 多孔菌科 Polyporaceae | 8 | 14 | 6.70 | 蜡蘑属 Laccaria | 5 | 2.39 |
| 红菇科 Russulaceae | 3 | 23 | 11.00 | 小皮伞属 Marasmius | 6 | 2.87 |
| 小菇属 Mycena | 11 | 5.26 | ||||
| 光柄菇属 Pluteus | 5 | 2.39 | ||||
| 红菇属 Russula | 17 | 8.13 | ||||
| 栓菌属 Trametes | 5 | 2.39 |