收藏切换
Comparison of three protein extraction methods for the proteomics research onPaenibacillus sp.
收藏切换
PDF
Lili SONG1, *, Xue ZHANG2, Gengxin ZHANG1, Xinli WEI3, Xianping WANG4
Acta Microbiologica Sinica | 2024, 64(2) : 623 - 632
Less
收藏切换
Acta Microbiologica Sinica | 2024, 64(2): 623-632
Technology and Method
Comparison of three protein extraction methods for the proteomics research onPaenibacillus sp.
Full
Lili SONG1, *, Xue ZHANG2, Gengxin ZHANG1, Xinli WEI3, Xianping WANG4
Affiliations
  • 1 Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Earth System, Environment and Resources (TPESER), Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
  • 2 College of Ecology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, China
  • 3 Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
  • 4 Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
Published: 2024-02-04 doi: 10.13343/j.cnki.wsxb.20230473
Outline
收藏切换

[Objective] The cell wall structure characteristics make it a challenge to obtain the whole proteins ofPaenibacillus sp. as a Gram-positive bacterium. We employed three representative lysis methods: lysozyme combined with ultrasonic treatment (method 1), lysozyme combined with SDS heat treatment (method 2), and liquid nitrogen combined with ultrasonic treatment (method 3), to obtain the samples for mass spectrometry-based proteomics research onPaenibacillus sp.[Methods] We compared the protein extraction efficiency of the three methods based on protein yield and SDS-PAGE. Furthermore, we analyzed the obtained protein samples by mass spectrometry.[Results] The protein extraction efficiency of the three methods was similar. The number of proteins identified in the sample prepared with method 3 was the highest (2 638 proteins), followed by that with method 1 (2 452 proteins), and that with method 2 was the lowest (2 003 proteins). The Venn diagram was established to compare the protein identification flux of the samples prepared with different methods. Considering the protein extraction efficiency and the shortcomings of method 3, we finally chose method 1 as the most suitable method to extract the proteins for mass spectrometry-based proteomic analysis. Finally, the basic properties of proteins identified by mass spectrometry, including molecular weight, isoelectric point, and hydrophobicity, were analyzed. The proportion of each component of the proteins obtained by the three methods was the same as that of the predicted proteins of the model strainPaenibacillus polymyxa.[Conclusion] For the proteomics research on Gram-positivePaenibacillus sp. by mass spectrometry, lysozyme combined with ultrasonic treatment is the most suitable method for sample preparation.

Gram-positive bacteria  /  protein lysates  /  proteomics  /  polypeptide
Lili SONG, Xue ZHANG, Gengxin ZHANG, Xinli WEI, Xianping WANG. Comparison of three protein extraction methods for the proteomics research onPaenibacillus sp.[J]. Acta Microbiologica Sinica, 2024 , 64 (2) : 623 -632 . DOI: 10.13343/j.cnki.wsxb.20230473
  • Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research (STEP) Program(2019QZKK0503)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China(42030508)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China(41871066)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China(41471055)
Year 2024 volume 64 Issue 2
PDF
108
43
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.13343/j.cnki.wsxb.20230473
  • Receive Date:2023-07-13
  • Online Date:2026-03-18
  • Published:2024-02-04
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2023-07-13
  • Accepted:2023-09-26
Funding
Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research (STEP) Program(2019QZKK0503)
National Natural Science Foundation of China(42030508)
National Natural Science Foundation of China(41871066)
National Natural Science Foundation of China(41471055)
Affiliations
    1 Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Earth System, Environment and Resources (TPESER), Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    2 College of Ecology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, China
    3 Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    4 Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

Corresponding:

*SONG Lili, Tel: +86-10-84097042, E-mail:
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/wswxb/EN/10.13343/j.cnki.wsxb.20230473
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT