收藏切换
Comparison of rhizosphere microbial community and keystone taxa among three network construction algorithms in Camphora migao
收藏切换
PDF
Jingyi ZHANG1, 2, 3, Yueyun WANG1, 2, 3, Jingzhong CHEN1, 2, 3, *, Qingwen SUN1, 2, 3, Xiaofeng LIAO4
Acta Microbiologica Sinica | 2025, 65(12) : 5630 - 5649
Less
收藏切换
Acta Microbiologica Sinica | 2025, 65(12): 5630-5649
Technology and Method
Comparison of rhizosphere microbial community and keystone taxa among three network construction algorithms in Camphora migao
Full
Jingyi ZHANG1, 2, 3, Yueyun WANG1, 2, 3, Jingzhong CHEN1, 2, 3, *, Qingwen SUN1, 2, 3, Xiaofeng LIAO4
Affiliations
  • 1.College of Pharmacy, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
  • 2.Engineering Research Center for Conservation and Evaluation of Germplasm Resources of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Ethnic Medicinal Materials in Guizhou Province, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
  • 3.Guizhou Key Laboratory for Raw Material of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
  • 4.Guizhou Botanical Garden, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
Published: 2025-12-04 doi: 10.13343/j.cnki.wsxb.20250378
Outline
收藏切换

Objective We compared the rhizosphere microbial interaction network structure and keystone taxon identification arising from distinct network construction algorithms, aiming to clarify the characteristics and advantages of each algorithm in inferring microbial interactions and identifying keystone taxa, thereby providing a theoretical basis for methodological selection. Methods Taking the rhizosphere microbial community of Camphora migao (a rare plant) as the model system, we constructed molecular ecological networks with three mainstream algorithms: sparse correlations for compositional data (SparCC), random matrix theory (RMT), and co-occurrence network (CoNet). We comprehensively compared network structural features and keystone taxon identification across algorithms by integrating PICRUSt2 functional prediction with keystone taxa-environmental factor correlation analysis. Results Network construction algorithms significantly influenced the topological properties of networks. SparCC generated highly modular networks (relative modularity index, RM=1.31) with distinct interaction segregation (edge connectivity=0). RMT produced a single-module structure (RM=0.78) and homogeneous connectivity (closeness centralization index=0.22). Integration of 26.0% negative correlations in CoNet reduced modularity (RM=0.95), increased network diameter (33.22 steps), and decreased robustness. Keystone taxon identification was method-dependent. Specifically, CoNet, SparCC, and RMT identified 224.00, 44.00, and 19.00 keystone taxa, respectively, with<9.2% cross-method overlap. Rhizobiales and Acidobacteriales were consistently identified as core keystone taxa by all methods, demonstrating cross-algorithm stability. The correlation analysis with environmental factors confirmed that these shared taxa significantly correlated with β-glucosidase activity, validating their role in cellulose degradation and highlighting methodological consistency in identifying key ecological processes. Conclusion The three algorithms exhibited complementary strengths: CoNet resolved complex competitive interactions; SparCC reliably assessed functional stability; RMT uncovered core functional modules. The correlation analysis with environmental factors validated the cellulose degradation function of keystone taxa, with high cross-method consistency in core ecological process identification. Our work provides a theoretical foundation for elucidating plant-microbe interactions and optimizing microbial network construction.

microbial networks  /  Camphora migao  /  network theory  /  rhizosphere microorganisms  /  keystone taxa
Jingyi ZHANG, Yueyun WANG, Jingzhong CHEN, Qingwen SUN, Xiaofeng LIAO. Comparison of rhizosphere microbial community and keystone taxa among three network construction algorithms in Camphora migao[J]. Acta Microbiologica Sinica, 2025 , 65 (12) : 5630 -5649 . DOI: 10.13343/j.cnki.wsxb.20250378
  • Guizhou Provincial Science and Technology Program(Qiankehe MS(2025)176)
  • Guizhou Provincial Science and Technology Support Program(Qiankehe [2023] General 049)
  • Guizhou Provincial Department of Education Natural Science Research Project(Qianjiaoji [2024]12)
  • Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Doctoral Startup Fund(Gui Zhongyao Qi Chuangqi [2023]31)
Year 2025 volume 65 Issue 12
PDF
257
106
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.13343/j.cnki.wsxb.20250378
  • Receive Date:2025-05-09
  • Online Date:2025-12-08
  • Published:2025-12-04
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-05-09
  • Accepted:2025-07-10
Funding
Guizhou Provincial Science and Technology Program(Qiankehe MS(2025)176)
Guizhou Provincial Science and Technology Support Program(Qiankehe [2023] General 049)
Guizhou Provincial Department of Education Natural Science Research Project(Qianjiaoji [2024]12)
Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Doctoral Startup Fund(Gui Zhongyao Qi Chuangqi [2023]31)
Affiliations
    1.College of Pharmacy, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
    2.Engineering Research Center for Conservation and Evaluation of Germplasm Resources of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Ethnic Medicinal Materials in Guizhou Province, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
    3.Guizhou Key Laboratory for Raw Material of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
    4.Guizhou Botanical Garden, Guiyang, Guizhou, China

Corresponding:

References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/wswxb/EN/10.13343/j.cnki.wsxb.20250378
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT