收藏切换
Spatiotemporal Variations and Obstacle Factors of Cultivated Land Ecological Security in Main Grain-Producing Areas of Yellow River Basin
收藏切换
Huifeng Liu1, Lulu Zheng1, Xiaoyang Han2, Chuanpeng Cheng1, Yuanzheng Li3, Qizheng Mao3
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation | 2026, 40(4) : 292 - 303
Less
收藏切换
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation | 2026, 40(4): 292-303
• Basic Research •
Spatiotemporal Variations and Obstacle Factors of Cultivated Land Ecological Security in Main Grain-Producing Areas of Yellow River Basin
Full
Huifeng Liu1, Lulu Zheng1, Xiaoyang Han2, Chuanpeng Cheng1, Yuanzheng Li3, Qizheng Mao3
Affiliations
  • 1.School of Agriculture and Rural Development,Henan University of Economics and Law,Zhengzhou 450046,China
  • 2.State Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Desertification Control,College of Soil and;Water Conservation Science and Engineering (Institute of Soil and Water Conservation),Northwest A&F;University,Yangling,Shaanxi 712100,China
  • 3.School of Urban and Rural Planning,Henan University of Economics and Law,Zhengzhou 450046,China
Published: 2026-08-28 doi: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2026.04.026
Outline
收藏切换

Objective To explore the spatiotemporal evolution patterns and main obstacle factors of cultivated land ecological security in the main grain-producing areas of the Yellow River basin, thereby providing a scientific reference for sustainable cultivated land use and improving ecological security. Methods Based on six-phase panel data from 60 prefecture-level cities in the Yellow River basin, the pressure-state-response (PSR) model was employed to construct an evaluation index system for cultivated land ecological security in the main grain-producing areas of the Yellow River basin. The entropy method and comprehensive index method were used to calculate the comprehensive index of cultivated land ecological security and classify its security level. The obstacle degree model was then used to identify the key obstacle factors affecting cultivated land ecological security. Results 1) The cultivated land ecological security index increased from 0.28 in 2000 to 0.43 in 2023, representing a relatively significant increase. The ecological security level shifted from "relatively unsafe" to "critically safe", but there remained a considerable gap from the "relatively safe" level, indicating substantial room for future improvement. 2) The level of cultivated land ecological security exhibited significant regional differences. From 2000 to 2015, only three cities had cultivated land ecological security at the "critically safe" level. In 2023, 45 cities had cultivated land ecological security at the "critically safe" level. 3) From the perspective of criteria layers, the obstacle degree of response showed a positive declining trend in Henan, Shandong, Sichuan, and Inner Mongolia. However, the primary obstacle factor in Henan, Shandong, and Sichuan was the obstacle degree of pressure, whereas Inner Mongolia needs to focus on overcoming the obstacle degree of state. 4) Cultivated land area per capita, disposable income of farmers, share of primary industry in GDP, land reclamation rate, and forest coverage were the main obstacle factors affecting cultivated land ecological security. Conclusion Cultivated land ecological security in the main grain-producing areas of the Yellow River Basin shows an overall trend of continuous improvement, but the overall level remains low, and severe challenges persist. The research results can provide strong scientific support for promoting tailored governance and policy implementation in different regions.

Yellow River basin  /  cultivated land ecological security  /  pressure-state-response (PSR) model  /  obstacle factor  /  spatiotemporal variation
刘慧峰, 郑璐璐, 韩晓阳, 程传鹏, 李元征, 毛齐正. 黄河流域粮食主产区耕地生态安全时空变化及障碍因子. 水土保持学报, 2026 , 40 (4) : 292 -303 . DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2026.04.026
Huifeng Liu, Lulu Zheng, Xiaoyang Han, Chuanpeng Cheng, Yuanzheng Li, Qizheng Mao. Spatiotemporal Variations and Obstacle Factors of Cultivated Land Ecological Security in Main Grain-Producing Areas of Yellow River Basin[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2026 , 40 (4) : 292 -303 . DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2026.04.026
Year 2026 volume 40 Issue 4
207
93
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2026.04.026
  • Receive Date:2026-01-19
  • Online Date:2026-09-30
  • Published:2026-08-28
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2026-01-19
  • Revised:2026-03-02
  • Accepted:2026-04-01
Funding
Affiliations
    1.School of Agriculture and Rural Development,Henan University of Economics and Law,Zhengzhou 450046,China
    2.State Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Desertification Control,College of Soil and;Water Conservation Science and Engineering (Institute of Soil and Water Conservation),Northwest A&F;University,Yangling,Shaanxi 712100,China
    3.School of Urban and Rural Planning,Henan University of Economics and Law,Zhengzhou 450046,China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/stbcxb/EN/10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2026.04.026
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT