收藏切换
Gully Erosion Susceptibility in Black Soil Region of Northeast China Based on Four Machine Learning Models
收藏切换
Xinyu Li1, Fenli Zheng1, 2, Binglong Wu2, Rong Li1
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation | 2026, 40(4) : 420 - 429
Less
收藏切换
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation | 2026, 40(4): 420-429
• Technical Method •
Gully Erosion Susceptibility in Black Soil Region of Northeast China Based on Four Machine Learning Models
Full
Xinyu Li1, Fenli Zheng1, 2, Binglong Wu2, Rong Li1
Affiliations
  • 1.State Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Desertification Control,College of Soil and;Water Conservation Science and Engineering (Institute of Soil and Water Conservation),Northwest A&F University,Yangling,Shaanxi 712100,China
  • 2.Institute of Soil and Water Conservation,Chinese Academy of;Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources,Yangling,Shaanxi 712100,China
Published: 2026-08-28 doi: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2026.04.013
Outline
收藏切换

Objective This study aims to construct a gully erosion susceptibility assessment model in order to provide an important scientific basis for early warning of gully erosion occurrence and its precise management in the black soil region of Northeast China. Methods Kedong County in Heilongjiang Province, a typical thick-layer black soil region, was selected as the study area. Erosion gullies were extracted based on 0.4 m high-resolution remote sensing images. Redundant variables were eliminated using the variance inflation factor (VIF). Four machine learning models covering linear, nonlinear, and ensemble learning architectures-logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)-were compared. The SHAP (Shapley Additive exPlanations) interpretability model was introduced to quantify the contribution of each influencing factor to gully erosion susceptibility. Results 1) XGBoost demonstrated the best predictive capability for gully erosion susceptibility (training set AUC=0.81, test set AUC=0.75), followed by the SVM and RF (test set AUC=0.74), while LR showed the weakest predictive capability (AUC=0.67). 2) The gully erosion susceptibility predicted by the four models all exhibited a spatial distribution pattern of "low in the periphery and high in the center" at the county scale, but there were significant differences in the susceptibility levels. The RF model predicted the largest proportion of high gully erosion susceptibility, accounting for 45.0%. The gully erosion susceptibility predicted by the SVM and XGBoost models in the study area was predominantly moderate and very low levels, accounting for 56.2% and 59.2%, respectively. In contrast, the LR prediction results indicated that low gully erosion susceptibility was dominant, covering 39.4% of the study area. 3) SHAP analysis revealed that the digital elevation model (DEM) was the dominant factor influencing gully erosion susceptibility (SHAP value=0.55), exhibiting a significant positive effect. The stream power index (SPI) had the second strongest positive driving effect on gully erosion susceptibility (SHAP value=0.30), while the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) showed a clear negative effect on gully erosion susceptibility (SHAP value=0.37). Conclusion In the thick-layer black soil region of Kedong County, significant differences are observed in the gully erosion susceptibility levels evaluated by the four machine learning models. The integration of the XGBoost model with the SHAP method enhances the interpretability of machine learning models in predicting gully erosion susceptibility. Moreover, gully erosion susceptibility is jointly driven by the coupled effects of "terrain-dominated control, vegetation regulation, and confluence hydrodynamics triggering". These findings deepen the understanding of gully erosion occurrence and provide theoretical guidance for optimizing gully erosion control measures in black soil regions.

machine learning  /  gully erosion susceptibility  /  black soil region of Northeast China  /  SHAP
李欣雨, 郑粉莉, 毋冰龙, 李蓉. 基于4种机器学习模型的东北黑土区沟蚀敏感性. 水土保持学报, 2026 , 40 (4) : 420 -429 . DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2026.04.013
Xinyu Li, Fenli Zheng, Binglong Wu, Rong Li. Gully Erosion Susceptibility in Black Soil Region of Northeast China Based on Four Machine Learning Models[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2026 , 40 (4) : 420 -429 . DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2026.04.013
Year 2026 volume 40 Issue 4
235
105
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2026.04.013
  • Receive Date:2026-01-03
  • Online Date:2026-09-30
  • Published:2026-08-28
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2026-01-03
  • Revised:2026-02-18
  • Accepted:2026-03-15
Funding
Affiliations
    1.State Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Desertification Control,College of Soil and;Water Conservation Science and Engineering (Institute of Soil and Water Conservation),Northwest A&F University,Yangling,Shaanxi 712100,China
    2.Institute of Soil and Water Conservation,Chinese Academy of;Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources,Yangling,Shaanxi 712100,China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/stbcxb/EN/10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2026.04.013
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT