收藏切换
COMPARSION OF THE INDUCTION VELOCITY BETWEEN NARROW ENDEMIC AND WIDESPREAD FISHES IN THE GENUS PSEUDORASBORA AND ITS CONSERVATION IMPLICATIONS FOR PSEUDORASBORA ELONGATE
收藏切换
PDF
Meng-Qi LIAO1, Yu-Xi LIAN1, 2, Zhi-Hua ZHONG1, Yi-Jun LI1, Ming DUAN3, Xiao-Ge YANG1, 2
Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica | 2026, 50(5) : 052607-58 - 052607-64
Less
收藏切换
Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica | 2026, 50(5): 052607-58-052607-64
Aquatic Animal Behaviour
COMPARSION OF THE INDUCTION VELOCITY BETWEEN NARROW ENDEMIC AND WIDESPREAD FISHES IN THE GENUS PSEUDORASBORA AND ITS CONSERVATION IMPLICATIONS FOR PSEUDORASBORA ELONGATE
Full
Meng-Qi LIAO1, Yu-Xi LIAN1, 2, Zhi-Hua ZHONG1, Yi-Jun LI1, Ming DUAN3, Xiao-Ge YANG1, 2
Affiliations
  • 1College of Life Science, Anqing Normal University, Anqing 246133, China
  • 2Engineering Technology Research Center for Aquatic Organism Conservation and Water Ecosystem Restoration in University of Anhui Province, Anqing 246133, China
  • 3Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430072, China
Published: 2026-05-15 doi: 10.3724/1000-3207.2025.2025.0354
Outline
收藏切换

In order to find out the difference of rheotaxis between narrow range species Pseudorasbora elongata and widespread species Pseudorasbora parva, and whether differences in flow sensitivity contribute to their contrasting distribution patterns, with the aim of informing conservation measures for P. elongata. In this study, we examined the induction velocity for P. elongata and P. parva with the increasing velocity protocol. The results showed that absolute induction velocity (AIF) was (2.88±1.00), (6.81±1.20), (9.63±2.28) cm/s, and relative induction velocity (RIF) was (0.47±0.11), (0.83±0.11), (1.09±0.24) BL/s for body length of 5.0—6.9, 7.0—8.4, 8.5—9.0 cm for P. elongate, respectively. Both AIF and RIF differed significantly among length groups (P<0.05). The AIF and RIF for body length of 5.0—6.9, 7.0—7.9, 8.0—9.0 cm was (5.25±0.82), (7.34±0.46), (7.91±1.03) cm/s, and (0.83±0.10), (0.98±0.06), (0.94±0.10) BL/s for P. parva, respectively. Except for the groups between 7.0—7.9 cm and 8.0—9.0 cm, there were significant differences in AIF and RIF between the other body length groups (P<0.05). The AIF and RIF were positively correlated with body length for both two species (P<0.001). Independent-samples t test showed that the AIF and RIF of P. elongata were significantly lower than that of P. parva (P<0.05). The greater sensitivity of the narrow-ranged P. elongata to water flow, compared to the widespread P. parva, is likely a key factor constraining its distribution. Therefore, conservation of P. elongata habitats should fully account for its rheotactic characteristics. River realignment should follow natural variations in channel width and morphology while meeting flood-discharge safety requirements. In addition, in the sections where the P. elongata has been distributed, the density of lower head dams should be reduced to maximize free-flowing intervals, and removal should be considered where feasible.

Narrow ranged species  /  Widespread species  /  Induction velocity  /  Pseudorasbora elongata  /  Pseudorasbora parva
Meng-Qi LIAO, Yu-Xi LIAN, Zhi-Hua ZHONG, Yi-Jun LI, Ming DUAN, Xiao-Ge YANG. COMPARSION OF THE INDUCTION VELOCITY BETWEEN NARROW ENDEMIC AND WIDESPREAD FISHES IN THE GENUS PSEUDORASBORA AND ITS CONSERVATION IMPLICATIONS FOR PSEUDORASBORA ELONGATE[J]. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica, 2026 , 50 (5) : 052607-58 -052607-64 . DOI: 10.3724/1000-3207.2025.2025.0354
Year 2026 volume 50 Issue 5
PDF
69
27
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.3724/1000-3207.2025.2025.0354
  • Receive Date:2025-10-11
  • Online Date:2026-05-09
  • Published:2026-05-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-10-11
  • Revised:2026-01-05
Affiliations
    1College of Life Science, Anqing Normal University, Anqing 246133, China
    2Engineering Technology Research Center for Aquatic Organism Conservation and Water Ecosystem Restoration in University of Anhui Province, Anqing 246133, China
    3Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430072, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ssswxb/EN/10.3724/1000-3207.2025.2025.0354
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT