Due to their light weight, low cost and high performance, plastics have become a necessity in our daily life
[1]. However, most plastics are notoriously difficult to degrade, leading to severe environmental pollution. Moreover, plastics, especially polycarbonate (PC), are recognized as one of the most extensively utilized engineering plastics, with applications across diverse industries. Their annual production has reached 5 million tons and is expected to rise to 8 million tons by 2026
[2−3]. Discarded PC has resulted in significant resource waste and environmental pollution due to the enormous increase in plastics production and consumption. Given the high organic carbon content of PC plastics, waste PC can be recycled through the design of advanced recycling routes. Consequently, developing green, economical, and efficient recycling methods for waste PC is crucial for solving the plastic pollution problem and recycling of the spent carbon resources. Current waste plastics cycling methods include landfill, incineration, mechanical recycling, and chemical recycling. While landfill, incineration, and mechanical recycling methods are simple and feasible, each of them has notable drawbacks. The landfilled plastics can be converted into microplastics, which are readily absorbed by animals and humans
[4], causing harm to health and ecosystems
[5]. Incineration releases greenhouse and harmful substances
[6]. Mechanical recycling, a physical degradation processes involving cutting, crushing, and melting, is primarily used for optical disc waste recycling. Furthermore, these methods are also unable to achieve the effective recovery of carbon resources from waste plastics. In contrast, chemical recycling can break down waste plastics into monomers or other high-value chemicals, enabling a more effective recovery of carbon-based resources from waste plastics.
As a promising alternative, chemical recycling improves the resource utilization efficiency and promotes environmental sustainability
[7]. It not only facilitates the production of value-added chemicals through bond recombination but also mitigates the environmental exposure by converting waste PC into valuable BPA or its derivatives, thereby enabling the efficient recycling of waste PC
[8−9]. A effectively approach is chemical depolymerization of discarded PC into valuable compounds. Significant progresses have been realized
via various methods in recent years such as thermal degradation
[10−11], photocatalysis
[12−13], biodegradation
[14−15], electrochemistry
[16], hydrogenolysis
[17−18] and solvolysis
[19−21]. Thermal degradation decomposes plastics into various lower molecular weight compounds under high temperature
[22]. Similarly, photocatalytic degradation produces a mixture of by-products, complicating the separation process
[23]. Biodegradation requires suitable enzymes or strains, and the associated screening and the products separation increase the difficulty of industrialization. Electrochemical degradation method employs renewable energy such as solar energy, wind energy or geothermal energy to degrade waste plastics into small molecular compounds. Although hydrogenolysis can effectively depolymerize PC, the harsh reaction conditions limit practical industrial application. Solvolysis, the decomposition of waste plastics in certain functional solvents, can selectively cleave chemical bonds, primarily ester bonds, to recover high-value chemicals and monomers. Compared to pyrolysis, the solvolysis method operates at lower reaction temperature with less energy consumption. Compared to photodegradation, it shows the higher degradation efficiency and product selectivity. Unlike biodegradation, the solvents required for the solvolysis method are available, and the degradation process is highly efficient. Moreover, the solvolysis method is more technologically mature than electrolytic depolymerization, and operates under mild reaction conditions than hydrogenolysis, which is conducive to practical industrial application.
Several solvolysis methods have been reported, such as ammonolysis, hydrolysis and alcoholysis
[24−26]. Ammonolysis, employing amine nucleophiles, breaks down of PC into valuable urea chemicals
[27−28]. Hydrolysis can degrade PC into BPA and dimethyl carbonate (DMC) in an environment ally friendly solvent, but exhibits low selectivity with the non-ideal by-product of CO
2[29]. Besides, high temperatures and pressures are required to enable interaction between polymer and water due to the rigidity and hydrophobicity of PC chains. In this instance, the presence of the solvent can improve the depolymerization degree
[30−32]. Alcoholysis produces depolymerizes PC through the cleavage of ester linkages by alcohols such as methanol, ethanol and ethylene glycol, yielding high-value small molecules
[33−35]. Compared to hydrolysis, although product separation is still difficult, the alcoholysis method has the advantages of high yield, mild conditions, and short reaction time.
Alcoholysis of PC waste can yield alkyl carbonate compounds in addition to BPA. However, a significant amount of concentrated base or superbase, such as DTU
[33], TBD
[36] and NaOH
[37−38], was usually utilized in the reported alcoholysis methods, which can cause in equipment corrosion, laborious procedures, and more wastewater. While solid catalysts such as NaAlO
2[39], ZnO-NPs/NBu
4Cl nanoparticles
[40], CaO-CeO
2/SBA-15
[41], CaO (SrO, BaO)/SBA-15
[42] can accelerate the alcoholysis process, they necessitate the additional solvent of THF, resulting to cumbersome post-processing. Moreover, although the solid catalysts enhance reaction rate at mild conditions, they also increase costs and decrease product purity. Methanol has the advantages of low boiling point, strong nucleophilicity and easy recovery, making it preferred for PC depolymerization compared to other alcohols. Therefore, the method of catalyst-free alcoholysis of PC is of great significance for the recovery of its monomer BPA.
This work describes an efficient, catalyst-free alcoholysis route for PC depolymerization in methanol to recover its monomer BPA. The effects of different alcoholic solvents and reaction parameters on depolymerization degree and BPA yield were studied. Complete depolymerization of PC and 95.0% yield of BPA were achieved at 160 °C for 8 h using methanol. The method proved effective for the alcoholysis of the real mixed plastics containing PC and other polyesters, achieving 100.0% depolymerization. A facile BPA separation process was developed, yielding a BPA recovery ratio over 85.0%. Besides, the route was successfully demonstrated in the scale-up experiment using 10 g PC as the substrate. The recovered BPA was characterized by GC-MS, FT-IR and NMR. Finally, a probable depolymerization mechanism was proposed. This work provides a simple and green recycling strategy for the valuable upgradation of waste PC.