Home Journals Articles Updates About
CN
image
收藏切换
S2ALM: Sequence-Structure Pre-trained Large Language Model for Comprehensive Antibody Representation Learning
收藏切换
PDF
Mingze Yin1, 2, Hanjing Zhou3, Jialu Wu4, Yiheng Zhu1, Yuxuan Zhan5, Zitai Kong1, Hongxia Xu4, Chang-Yu Hsieh4, *, Jintai Chen6, *, Tingjun Hou4, *, Jian Wu2, 5, 7, *
Research. Vol 8 Article ID 0721
Less
收藏切换
Research. Vol 8 Article ID 0721
• Research Article •
S2ALM: Sequence-Structure Pre-trained Large Language Model for Comprehensive Antibody Representation Learning
Full
Mingze Yin1, 2, Hanjing Zhou3, Jialu Wu4, Yiheng Zhu1, Yuxuan Zhan5, Zitai Kong1, Hongxia Xu4, Chang-Yu Hsieh4, *, Jintai Chen6, *, Tingjun Hou4, *, Jian Wu2, 5, 7, *
Affiliations
  • 1College of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
  • 2Institute of Wenzhou, Zhejiang University, Wenzhou, China.
  • 3Zhejiang Cuisine Bird Supply Chain Management Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China.
  • 4College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
  • 5School of Public Health, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
  • 6AI Thrust, Information Hub, HKUST(GZ), Guangzhou, China.
  • 7Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging Artificial Intelligence, Hangzhou, China.
About Author:

† These authors contributed equally to this work.

Published: 2025-08-20 doi: 10.34133/research.0721
Outline
收藏切换

Antibodies safeguard our health through their precise and potent binding to specific antigens, demonstrating promising therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of numerous diseases, including COVID-19. Recent advancements in biomedical language models have shown the great potential to interpret complex biological structures and functions. However, existing antibody-specific models have a notable limitation that they lack explicit consideration for antibody structural information, despite the fact that both 1-dimensional sequence and 3-dimensional structure carry unique and complementary insights into antibody behavior and functionality. This paper proposes the Sequence-Structure multi-level pre-trained Antibody Language Model (S2ALM), combining holistic sequential and structural information in one unified, generic antibody foundation model. We construct a hierarchical pre-training paradigm incorporated with 2 customized multi-level training objectives to facilitate the modeling of comprehensive antibody representations. S2ALM’s representation space uncovers inherent functional binding mechanisms, biological evolution properties, and structural interaction patterns. Pre-trained over 75 million sequences and 11.7 million structures, S2ALM can be adopted for diverse downstream tasks: accurately predicting antigen–antibody binding affinities, precisely distinguishing B cell maturation stages, identifying antibody crucial binding positions, and specifically designing novel coronavirus-binding antibodies. Remarkably, S2ALM outperforms well-established and renowned baselines and sets new state-of-the-art performance across extensive antibody-specific understanding and generation tasks. S2ALM’s ability to model comprehensive and generalized representations further positions its potential to advance real-world therapeutic antibody development, potentially addressing unmet academic, industrial, and clinical needs.

Mingze Yin, Hanjing Zhou, Jialu Wu, Yiheng Zhu, Yuxuan Zhan, Zitai Kong, Hongxia Xu, Chang-Yu Hsieh, Jintai Chen, Tingjun Hou, Jian Wu. S2ALM: Sequence-Structure Pre-trained Large Language Model for Comprehensive Antibody Representation Learning[J]. Research, 2025 , 8 (8) : 0721 - . DOI: 10.34133/research.0721
Full Text
Less
Introduction
Less
Antibodies, also known as immunoglobulins, are specialized proteins produced by the immune system to protect against a range of diseases (e.g., severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 [SARS-CoV-2]), which fulfill the responsibility as guardians in the human body via evolving to complement their structures with the corresponding antigen structures [1–4]. Due to the high specificity and low adverse effect of antibodies, antibody drugs have important clinical significance and account for nearly one-fifth of new drug approvals by the Food and Drug Administration each year [5]. By mimicking the actions of the immune system, these drugs specifically target harmful agents like viruses and cancer cells, to detect viral infections or stimulate T cell immunity in cancer treatment [6–9]. Therefore, deciphering the information stored in antibody sequences and structures is crucial for understanding immune responses and disease development, and may accelerate the development of therapeutic antibodies for broad-spectrum disease treatment.
To alleviate the burden of time-consuming wet-lab experiments, in recent years, the computer-aided antibody engineering has emerged to improve the efficiency of antibody evolution and identify promising therapeutic antibodies with desirable developability profiles. While interpretable, traditional representation learning approaches depend on inefficient hand-crafted features that may miss hidden or latent patterns in diverse data. Drawing inspiration from natural language processing with the introduction of pre-trained foundational models, similar artificial intelligence technologies have emerged as the pivotal technology to interpret the language of biology [10–14]. Pre-trained on large-scale antibody corpora, antibody-specific large language models (ALMs) [6,7,15–18] have exhibited powerful capabilities in advancing the understanding of antibody structures and functions. Additionally, ALMs consistently outperform general-purpose protein language models (PLMs) because the mechanism of antibody evolution is strongly biased to the target antigen. This finding inspires us to dive deep into the development of comprehensive antibody-specific pre-training.
The central tenet of molecular biology is that an antibody’s amino acid sequence determines its 3-dimensional (3D) structure, and the 3D structure determines its biological function. The spatial structure plays an integral role for antibody functional characterization, as the principle of antigen–antibody structural binding indicates that antibody structures directly determine biological functions. Consequently, injecting structural information into antibody pre-training emerges a highly compelling endeavor. In this paper, we propose the Sequence-Structure multi-level pre-trained Antibody Language Model (S2ALM), incorporating antibody sequential and structural information to construct a comprehensive antibody foundation model. To accomplish this, we collect a holistic pre-training dataset with massive 1D sequences and 3D structures, and propose a hierarchical pre-training paradigm (Fig. 1), accompanied by 2 customized training objectives: sequence-structure matching (SSM) and cross-level reconstruction (CLR). These methodologies allow the model to concurrently process and analyze antibody sequence and structure data, further modeling comprehensive antibody representations to facilitate the deciphering of the biological language.
Through extensive interpretability analyses, S2ALM exhibited an emergent understanding of unobserved patterns inherent in antibody structures and functions. Furthermore, to illustrate S2ALM ’s practical effectiveness, we conducted in-depth examinations to assess the performance of S2ALM across a range of downstream scenarios for antibody analysis. The outstanding performance verifies the S2ALM’s substantial potential to serve as the novel antibody foundation model and highlights its applicability in real-world therapeutic development.
The main contributions of S2ALM are 3-fold:
•

Pre-trained on a large-scale multi-level dataset containing 75 million 1D sequences and 11.7 million 3D structures from protein and antibody domains, S2ALM learns comprehensive antibody representations uncovering inherent patterns within structures and functions.

•

A hierarchical pre-training paradigm incorporated with 2 customized training objectives, sequence-structure matching and cross-level reconstruction, is proposed to promote the injection of antibody structural information.

•

S2ALM consistently exceeds state-of-the-art performance on extensive tasks including antigen binding prediction, B cell maturation analysis, antibody paratope prediction, binding affinity prediction, and computational antibody design, exhibiting its broad applicability in therapeutic antibody development and immune response analysis.

Results
Less
S2ALM: pre-trained ALM integrating sequences and structures
In this paper, we pre-trained a large-scale antibody-specific language model S2ALM, which integrates multi-level information of 1D sequences and 3D structures for comprehensive antibody representation learning. To accomplish this, the model architecture is built upon ESM-2 [19], comprising 650 million trainable parameters to facilitate the large-scale pre-training. Additionally, we collect a large-scale comprehensive training dataset, composed of sequences and structures from both protein and antibody domains. Furthermore, Foldseek [20] is introduced to execute the efficient encoding of protein and antibody 3D structures, transforming 3D structures to 3Di sequences. Given sufficient 1D and 3Di sequences of proteins and antibodies, we propose a hierarchical pre-training paradigm, where 2 pre-training stages are constructed to foster holistic understandings of general proteins and specific antibodies correspondingly. To further combine sequential and structural information, we develop 2 customized pre-training objectives, namely, sequence-structure matching and cross-level reconstruction. Equipped with a comprehensive dataset, an efficient encoding technique, a hierarchical pre-training paradigm, and tailored pre-training objectives, the resulting S2ALM acquires general-purpose antibody representations containing biological information derived from both 1D sequences and 3D structures. To our best knowledge, S2ALM is the first large-scale pre-trained antibody-specific language model that encodes sequences and structures in a hybrid manner for comprehensive representation learning. In contrast to ALMs solely trained on massive sequences, our main contribution to the biological community lies in the additional infusion of structural information into S2ALM. (See detailed advantages over other large language models [LLMs] in Note S4.) The structure-enhanced representations demonstrate a strong potential to broadly benefit antibody understanding and generation applications.
Observation of multi-scale organization in antibody representations
The variation observed in large antibody sequence datasets is influenced by processes at many scales, including functional properties that affect binding to specific antigens, species selection biases, and isotype biases that reflect different B cell maturation stages. Uncovering inherent patterns and properties is crucial for comprehending antibody properties. Unsupervised learning captures latent factors that, while unobserved, prove instrumental in elucidating the biological sequence variation [9]. We investigate the representation space of the pre-trained large language models at aforementioned multiple scales to look for signatures of biological organization.
For a more intuitive comparison, the t-SNE algorithm [21] is employed to visualize the antibody representations generated by the last layer of LLMs. To comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness of large-scale pre-training, it is necessary to compare representations encoded by the untrained S2ALM with randomly initialized weights and the pre-trained S2ALM [7]. We also include the well-established and powerful ESM-2 [19] (pre-trained on protein sequences) for comparison to further verify the superiority of the constructed S2ALM.
Pre-training encodes functional specificity
Antibodies have emerged as essential therapeutic agents in the treatment of various autoimmune, infectious, and metabolic diseases, mainly owing to their ability to specifically bind to corresponding antigens [6,22]. Precise identification of antibody functional specificity will greatly enhance the progress of antibody development and optimization. From the Observed Antibody Space (OAS) database [23], we systematically identify and filter out 6,000 antibodies that exhibit specific binding affinities toward 3 distinct pathogens: HIV, Ebola virus, and SARS-CoV-2.
We hereby present the t-SNE visualization analyses in Fig. 2A. Surprisingly, ESM-2 [19] somewhat succeeds in distinguishing among these 3 types of antibodies, but there remains some confusion regarding antibodies targeting SARS-CoV-2 and the Ebola virus. The pre-trained S2ALM produces more clearly aggregated antibody representations for all 3 pathogens, contrasting with scattered representations from the untrained model and ESM-2. This further verifies the necessity of our pre-training phase and indicates that the representations extracted by S2ALM contain antibody functional specificity information.
Pre-training encodes biological species
Due to substantial differences in their genetic information and immune function mechanisms, antibodies from different species are expected to exhibit notable distribution disparities. We randomly sample and collect 15,000 antibody sequences from the OAS database [23], ensuring an equal number of distinct species. The primary sources of biological species are taken into account for antibody sequencing, including camel, human, mouse, rabbit, and rat.
The t-SNE visualization is shown in Fig. 2B. We first observe that, when encoded by untrained S2ALM, all antibodies from different species tend to mix together in the t-SNE 2-dimensional space. Additionally, ESM-2 [19] successfully uncovers some clue about the species origins of various antibodies, whereas there are still some confounding issues regarding the boundaries of the clusters. Notably, antibodies of distinct species are nicely clustered together after being encoded by pre-trained S2ALM, indicating that the learned representations are encoded with rich biological species information.
Pre-training encodes evolutionary isotypes
Antibodies of different isotypes activate distinct effector mechanisms, manifesting at different stages of the immune response, and differing in structures and locations. Isotype expression reflects the maturation stage of a B cell. Naive B cells express immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgD isotypes with unmutated variable genes, while expression of other antibody isotypes (IgG, IgA, and IgE) occurs after antigen exposure [24]. Distinguishing antibody isotypes evaluates the injection of evolutionary information during the model pre-training phase. We select 2,000 antibody sequences from the OAS database [23] per distinct isotype, resulting in a total of 10,000 sequences for t-SNE visualization analyses.
As illustrated in Fig. 2C, when exploiting representations extracted by untrained S2ALM and the pre-trained ESM-2 [19] for t-SNE projection, the organizations of antibodies with various isotypes are predominantly diffuse. This may be attributed to the fact that isotype classification heavily relies on antibody-specific evolutionary information, which the untrained S2ALM and the pre-trained ESM-2 are unable to capture. In contrast, we can observe a distinct clustering phenomenon utilizing antibody representations with different isotypes derived from the pre-trained S2ALM. The visualization provides a sanity check for the ability of S2ALM to extract the valuable information of antibody evolutionary isotypes.
S2ALM captures clues on antibody structure
It is essential for antibody-specific language models to identify and focus on crucial interaction sites during the representation learning process. The multi-head self-attention mechanism, which specifically focuses on the different aspects of antibodies, has the potential to capture sophisticated interdependencies within the antibody structure. As a practical demonstration of S2ALM’s proficiency in modeling the antibody structural interaction patterns, we execute a structural interpretability analysis, and we find that residue pairs with high self-attention scores can accurately reveal long-range structural contacts. Specifically, the antibody STE90-C11 (Protein Data Bank [PDB]: 7B3O), a SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody that binds to the ACE2-RBD interface, is selected as an example input. The self-attention scores from the last hidden layer in S2ALM are extracted to build the heatmap, and we identify the potential hydrogen bond locations within the antibody structure. This allows assessing whether S2ALM identifies antibody residue structural interactions. As shown in Fig. 3A, the heatmap displays a high self-attention score between residues TRP157 and SER183 (highlighted in orange), serving as an indicator of potential structural associations among these 2 residues. Correspondingly, the intricate crystal structure precisely substantiates the existence of a hydrogen bond between residues TRP157 and SER183. While the interpretation of attention mechanisms remains an active area of research, this analysis provides an intuitive way to gain profound comprehension of the model’s functional mechanism. S2ALM showcases its ability to meaningfully highlight the key interaction sites within antibody structures, reaffirming the superiority of incorporating structural information during ALM pre-training.
S2ALM accurately predicts antigen binding capacity
Establishing the precise binding specificity between antibodies and their target antigens is central to accelerating advancements in therapeutic antibody optimization and deepening our comprehension of the intricacies inherent to the immune response. Consequently, rapid and accurate evaluation of the antigen binding capacity stands as a pressing and fundamental requirement in the realm of antibody research and development. Antigen binding capacity prediction is a binary sequence classification task to determine binding capacity with the specific antigen, where each antibody is mapped to a neutralization or non-neutralization label. Specifically, we input antibody sequences into the pre-trained S2ALM to extract biological representations. The classification head (i.e., a linear projection layer) is added on top of the pre-trained model to output logits for identifying neutralization or non-neutralization classes. With a keen focus on the interaction between the target antigen human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and the clinically approved wild-type antibody trastuzumab, we compile a dataset of antibody-expressing sequences. These sequences are designed by replacing the original trastuzumab sequence with a myriad of variant CDR-H3 fragments from the heavy chain, as detailed in Refs. [18,26]. The resulting dataset boasts an impressive scale of 21,612 unique antibody sequences and applies the training/validation/test split of 15,128/3,242/3,242 (i.e., 70%/15%/15%). Our comparative analysis encompasses baselines of different types, including those pre-trained on protein sequences (i.e., ESM-1b [27] and MSA-1b [28]) and those pre-trained on antibody sequences (i.e., AbLang-H [17], AbLang-L [17], AntiBERTa [15], and EATLM [18]). Three classification metrics are utilized for evaluation. AUC is the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, indicating the performance at all classification thresholds. F1 is the average weighted score of precision and recall. Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) is the coefficient between true and predicted values.
We report the evaluation results of the proposed S2ALM and various baselines in Table 1 (left). On the one hand, ESM-1b and MSA-1b yield relatively inferior performance due to the domain knowledge gap between proteins and antibodies. On the other hand, among baselines pre-trained on antibody sequences, AbLang-H outperforms AbLang-L and AntiBERTa, indicating the advantage of separate training for heavy and light chain sequences. However, the true standout in these evaluations is S2ALM, which surpasses all baselines and sets a new state-of-the-art performance in this task. Such accomplishment underscores the capacity of S2ALM to transcend traditional sequence-based models in antigen binding prediction.
S2ALM precisely distinguishes B cell maturation states
B cells occupy a central position in the immune system’s protective arsenal, due to their distinctive ability to generate antibodies. In the human body, these antibodies serve as a vital line of defense against invading pathogens [7]. Therefore, exploring and analyzing the process of B cell antibody maturation remains crucial, enhancing our understanding of the intricate mechanisms that unfold during immune system evolution (i.e., a critical biological process affecting the function and antigen binding specificity of antibodies) [29,30]. B cell maturation analysis is a 6-category classification task. Its core objective lies in accurately distinguishing the maturation states of B cell antibody sequences. Each antibody sequence belongs to one of {immature, transitional, mature, plasmacytes, memory IgD+, memory IgD-} states. Accomplishing this necessitates a model capable of learning an evolution-aware representation sensitive to different B cell maturation states, with a linear projection layer serving as the classification head. We utilize a total of 88,094 antibody sequences from [18,31] with 6 maturation states and apply the default data split. The evaluation metric is accuracy (ACC), calculating the ratio of correct predictions.
Table 1 (center) demonstrates the findings of model ability to distinguish between multiple B cell mature states. For the baselines pre-trained on protein sequences, both ESM-1b [27] and MSA-1b [28] present inferior performance. Even though armed with evolution-aware representations learned from multiple protein sequence alignments, MSA-1b performs poorly in this antibody maturation related task. Such phenomenon suggests that there is a gap between protein and antibody domains. For those pre-trained on antibody-specific sequences (i.e., AbLang-H [17], AbLang-L [17], AntiBERTa [15], and EATLM [18]), they deliver promising results in this task. Notably, S2ALM, pre-trained on both antibody sequences and structures, achieves a substantial leap forward and surpasses all baselines by a large margin. The evaluation result highlights the efficacy of S2ALM in improving the comprehension of B cell maturation and immune evolutionary mechanisms.
S2ALM thoroughly identifies antibody paratopes
In immunology research, identifying the amino acids in immunoglobulins that specifically bind to antigens (i.e., the antibody paratope) is one of the most crucial and challenging tasks [32]. The antibody paratope, usually composed of multiple amino acids in the complementarity-determining regions, forms the antibody binding site, which is essential for antigen interactions in the immune response [33]. Antibody paratope prediction could significantly help to enhance our understanding of the binding mechanisms of therapeutic antibodies. It is a binary token labeling task that identifies specific binding positions within antibody sequences, assigning a 0/1 label to each amino acid residue. We add a linear projection layer atop the pre-trained model to act as the prediction head. For paratope prediction, we utilize 2 antibody datasets sourced from Refs. [15,18], which comprise 277 and 900 antibody sequences annotated with token-wise paratope regions. Numerous baseline models are utilized, including Sapiens-H [34], ProtBERT [35], AntiBERTa [15], AntiBERTy [16], ESM-1b [27], ESM-2 [19], BALM [9], MSA-1b [28], AbLang-H [17], AbLang-L [17], and EATLM [18]. Experimental metrics used to evaluate the prediction capability include AUC, F1 score, and MCC.
Table 1 (right) reports results on antibody paratope prediction benchmark [18], and we observe that S2ALM achieves considerable improvements while other baselines show no significant difference in performance. Fig. 3D depicts results on antibody paratope prediction benchmark [15], where S2ALM stands out by outperforming all other baselines across all criteria. The holistic experimental results showcase the superiority of our model in efficiently capturing features associated with antibody binding sites. This further highlights S2ALM’s high specificity, accuracy, and in-depth understanding of antibody complex binding mechanisms.
S2ALM accurately predicts antigen–antibody binding affinity
Therapeutic antibody development has become an increasingly popular strategy for drug discovery, but still involves intensive laboratory experiments [36]. Recently, deep learning methods have emerged as a promising approach to accelerate such process by identifying high-affinity antibody candidates [36,37]. The property of binding affinity, which quantifies the binding strength between antigen–antibody pairs, plays a critical role in antibody development and optimization. To assess the model’s performance in predicting the binding affinity, we first utilize 2 datasets, 14H and 14L [38], which contain abundant antibodies labeled with binding affinity values. Within these 2 datasets, the affinity values quantify the binding strength of antibodies to a stable peptide in the HR2 region of SARS-CoV-2. To further expand the diversity of binding antigens and thereby enhance both the comprehensiveness and reliability of this experiment, we also include the BioMap [39] dataset for the evaluation of binding affinity prediction. The BioMap dataset contains 1,706 antigen–antibody pairing data with labeled binding affinity values, in which most antibodies stem from human and mouse sources. As for the experiment execution, the 14H, 14L, and BioMap datasets are each divided into the training/validation/test set according to the 80%/10%/10% split following He et al. [7]. Based on the test sets, we record experimental results for fair comparison with extensive baselines (i.e., Vanilla BERT [40], Ens-Grad [41], AbMAP [42], AntiBERTa2 [43], ESM-F [19], and A2binder [7]). In this binding affinity prediction task, we use the Pearson correlation and the Spearman correlation as evaluation metrics. Building upon pre-trained S2ALM, we extend and enhance the model architecture to enable the accurate learning of antigen–antibody binding rules. As illustrated in Fig. 4 (left), S2ALM is employed to extract features of antibodies, while ESM-2 [19] is introduced for the feature encoding of antigens. The antibody and antigen features extracted by pre-trained models are subsequently integrated through concatenation. Finally, the MLP (a multilayer perceptron) model utilizes the combined feature representation to predict binding affinity.
Table 2 illustrates the performance comparison of models in predicting the antigen–antibody binding affinity. S2ALM consistently achieves state-of-the-art performance in Pearson correlation and Spearman correlation metrics. We observe that S2ALM significantly surpasses all baselines, except for the BioMap dataset, where it achieves the same Spearman correlation as A2binder. The experimental results further verify the heightened precision of S2ALM in predicting the antigen–antibody binding affinity. By integrating both sequence and structure data for large-scale pre-training, S2ALM effectively captures the specific functional information of antibodies. We believe that S2ALM has the great potential to serve as the antibody-specific foundation model to promote the therapeutic antibody development in real-world scenarios.
S2ALM enables computational antibody CDR design
Given the extraordinary performance on antibody understanding tasks related to the evolutionary process and functional mechanism, we additionally incorporate a novel generation task to further evaluate the model’s capability of antibody generation and optimization. The complementarity-determining region (CDR), also known as the hypervariable region, primarily determines the antibody’s affinity and specificity for its target. Given the crucial role of CDRs, computational antibody design primarily focuses on generating these regions. Specifically, antibody CDR design is a sequence infilling task to generate masked CDRs (more exactly, CDR-H3) based on the contextualized representation. For antibody CDR design, the dataset curated by Jin et al. [44] follows the training/validation/test split of 2,282/291/291 samples derived from the Coronavirus Antibody Database (CoV-AbDab) [45]. CoV-AbDab is a public database documenting molecular information (sequences and structures) of all published and patented antibodies and nanobodies that can bind to coronaviruses, including SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV-1, and MERS-CoV [45]. During this experiment, we mask the CDRs in both 1D and 3Di antibody sequences for S2ALM to reconstruct. To benchmark the quality of antibody sequences generated by S2ALM, we employ ProtBERT [35], AbLang-H [17], and ReprogBERT [22] for comparison. Three metrics are utilized for holistic evaluation. Perplexity (PPL) measures how well the language model predicts the generative tokens. Here, we exploit off-the-shelf ProGen [46] for calculation following Melnyk et al. [22]. Lower values signify better performance, indicating stronger naturalness of the generated CDRs. Amino acid recovery (AAR) is computed for the specific sequence region of interest, measuring the percent of the exact matches between ground truth and sampled sequences. The higher the AAR, the more accurate the recovery. Diversity (DIV) computes the complement of the average recovery of all pairwise comparisons using sampled CDRs. A higher value corresponds to an increased dissimilarity among the samples themselves.
The evaluation results are shown in Fig. 3B. In spite of the high AAR, ProtBERT struggles in low generation diversity. AbLang-H and ReprogBERT are particularly talented in generation diversity but demonstrate relatively high perplexity. In contrast, S2ALM achieves substantially high AAR and the lowest perplexity while maintaining the comparable high diversity to ReprogBERT, accomplishing the balance of all 3 generative metrics. Leveraging the CDR infilling paradigm, S2ALM successfully generates CDR loop libraries with improved in silico developability profiles. This strongly indicates that S2ALM could serve as an effective and insightful tool for computational antibody design, benefiting the biomedical research community.
3D structural visualization
To further manifest the advantages of incorporating structural information during ALM pre-training, we conduct 3D visualization of antigen–antibody complexes generated by S2ALM. The thorough workflow for antibody sequence generation and structure visualization is depicted in Fig. 4 (right). Based on a holistic antigen–antibody complex dataset of 60 antigen–antibody pairs constructed by Adolf-Bryfogle et al. [47], S2ALM designs antibody CDR-H3 via sequence infilling. For each antigen–antibody complex, 100 CDR-H3 samples are generated and combined with standard framework regions to obtain 100 full-length antibody heavy chains. We select the top 3 antibody heavy chains with the highest naturalness using ProGen2 [48], following the standard protocol [7,22]. Subsequently, AlphaFold3 [25], highly capable of predicting the antigen–antibody joint structure, is applied to generate the 3D structures of complexes comprising antigen and generated antibodies (including antibody heavy chains and corresponding light chains). Evaluation metrics of the folded 3D structure are the predicted template-modeling (pTM) score, the interface pTM (ipTM), and the predicted local distance difference test (pLDDT). Moreover, to facilitate a thorough comparison, we involve a variety of language models: ESM-2 [19], pre-trained on general protein sequences; SaProt [49], which harnesses both protein sequences and structures for pre-training; and 2 dedicated ALMs, AntiBERTa [15] and AbLang-H [17]. The structural evaluation results through AlphaFold3 are illustrated in Fig. 3E. SaProt and AbLang-H stand out among all baselines, verifying the advantages of injecting structural information and promoting antibody-specific learning. S2ALM consistently achieves the optimal pTM, ipTM, and pLDDT scores compared to other methods, demonstrating that the generated antibodies are more likely to target the corresponding antigens and form stable binding complexes. Furthermore, we visualize the generated 3D complex structures targeting 3 clinically important pathogens (i.e., Vaccinia virus, Neisseria meningitidis, and Influenza B virus). Fig. 3F depicts some visualization examples. The stable and regular 3D structures of designed antigen–antibody complexes fully exhibit the superior generative capability of S2ALM, which pioneeringly incorporates 3D structural information into ALM pre-training.
Discussion
Less
Antibodies are vital proteins produced by the immune system to safeguard against and combat with a variety of diseases [1]. There are abundant clinical applications of antibody analysis in therapeutic drug discovery and finding novel diagnostics [6,7,15,50]. Most analyses have focused on comparing high-level differences between cohorts to facilitate antibody understanding, such as number of somatic hypermutations, isotype subclass usage, and V(D)J gene segment usage. With the advancements of machine learning techniques, it has been verified in various studies that transformer-based LLMs significantly promote the understanding and decoding of biological language [6,7,10,51,52]. The biological function of an antibody is directly determined by its 3D structure; thus, the modalities of sequence and structure should be tightly coupled to generate a comprehensive representation of the antibody. However, existing works fall short in effectively injecting structural information during antibody pre-training, which substantially hinders the further progress.
In this study, our endeavor herein offers an antibody-specific foundation model that posits the potential to facilitate comprehensive antibody understanding and generation. Extensive machine learning paradigms and techniques are utilized in developing S2ALM. To our best knowledge, S2ALM stands out as the first ALM to integrate hybrid information of 1D sequences and 3D structures during large-scale pre-training. S2ALM extracts comprehensive and meaningful antibody representations, uncovering inherent patterns and properties of functional specificity, biological species, and evolutionary isotypes. Additionally, as a supplement to interpretability analysis, S2ALM precisely captures crucial interaction sites within 3D structures. Evaluated on diverse computational scenarios, S2ALM exhibits a state-of-the-art performance in antibody representation learning: accurately predicting antigen binding capacity, precisely distinguishing B cell maturation states, thoroughly identifying antibody paratopes, and accurately predicting antigen–antibody binding affinity. To further explore the potential applications, we employ S2ALM for computational antibody design leveraging the CDR infilling paradigm. The generated stable and regular 3D structures further indicate the superior generative capability of S2ALM. We hold the expectation that our work will usher in a new era of antibody multi-level pre-training via explicitly modeling the profound interrelation between sequences and structures, fostering the development of therapeutic antibody drugs in real-world scenarios.
While our work demonstrates promising and outstanding results in extensive antibody-specific downstream tasks, there are still some areas for improvement and future exploration: (a) Due to computational constraints, the model size of S2ALM may not have reached its maximum capacity. (b) Although we circumnavigate such constraints by introducing extra protein structures in our hierarchical pre-training paradigm, the limitation of antibody structure data cannot be overlooked. In the future, we eagerly anticipate the emergence of large-scale antibody structure databases with sufficient experimentally determined 3D structures. Such efforts will fill the void of large-scale antibody structure corpus, thereby fueling multi-level antibody pre-training. (c) The performance of structural pre-training heavily depends on Foldseek [20], which aims to balance search efficiency and encoding accuracy. Thus, there is still room for improving the representation capability of all methods building upon Foldseek, including ours.
To conclude, this paper documents our efforts to build a comprehensive antibody-specific foundation model to represent the intricacies of the biological world. The capabilities demonstrated by S2ALM exhibit considerable promise and underscore several areas in antibody understanding and generation that necessitate substantial advancements. Such a multi-level pre-trained foundational model, integrating antibody sequential and structural information, will prove immensely valuable in accelerating immunotherapy development and enhancing our comprehension of biological phenomena.
Materials and Methods
Less
Pre-training data
In the field of antibody pre-training, there is an abundance of sequential data, whereas the quantity of structure data remains limited, especially those determined by experiments. To compensate for the inadequacy of experimentally determined antibody structures, we additionally introduce computationally predicted antibody structures and general protein structures for comprehensive large-scale pre-training. Eventually, our holistic pre-training data encompass various levels and span multiple domains, including 75 million 1D sequences and 11.7 million 3D structures from protein and antibody domains. Fig. 5A and B presents compositional ratios of various parts in the pre-training dataset, and details of each part are as follows.
Protein sequence and structure data
Extensive protein sequence and structure data are incorporated for general sequence-structure learning. Specifically, for the primary structural information (i.e., sequential information), 65 million protein sequences are derived from UniRef50 [53], which is a clustering of UniRef90 seed sequences at 50% sequence identity. Moreover, to alleviate the insufficiency of antibody structure data, the extra protein structure data are incorporated. For the secondary and tertiary structural information, we utilize 0.2 million experimentally determined general protein 3D structures sourced from the PDB [54] and 10 million computationally predicted protein 3D structures from the AlphaFold Protein Structure Database (AFDB) [55].
Antibody sequence data
The pre-training antibody sequence data come from the OAS database [23], which contains over 2.4 billion unpaired sequences and 3 million paired sequences of antibody heavy and light chains. The OAS database boasts a rich collection of antibody sequences from 825 unique subjects spanning across 6 different species, where humans account for 88% and mice account for 11%. We downloaded the OAS database of unpaired and paired antibody sequences on 2024 January 11, and pre-processed the antibody sequence data by filtering, cleaning, and clustering. First, all duplicate antibody sequences were filtered out and removed. Additionally, we excluded antibody sequences containing unusual residues (selenocysteine and pyrrolysine), along with those having any framework region shorter than IMGT defined. Furthermore, to mitigate data leakage, we clustered antibody sequences at 70% sequence identity over the whole sequence using the MMseq2 algorithm [56]. Alignment coverage in MMseq2 was calculated with respect to the target sequence (“cov-mode 1”), with all other parameters set to their default values. Ultimately, the antibody sequence data comprise 43,551,946 unique antibody sequences, from which we randomly select 10 million sequences for training.
Antibody structure data
Given the central tenet that antibody structure substantially governs its function, we innovatively explore to inject antibody-specific structural knowledge into ALMs. To achieve this, we collect experimentally determined antibody structure data based on the Structural Antibody Database [59], which is composed of approximately 10 thousand antibody structures retrieved from the PDB [54]. Considering the limited quantity of experimentally determined antibody structures, we seek antibody structure prediction models for assistance to provide ample computationally predicted structures. Concretely, approximately 150 thousand antibody structures predicted by ABodyBuilder2 [57] and 1.4 million antibody structures predicted by IgFold [58] are incorporated for pre-training. Overall, the aforementioned 3 data sources collectively contribute to antibody structure learning.
Structural encoding technique
Foldseek [20] is a computational tool for fast and accurate protein structure search, merging features such as amino acid spatial angles, distances, and sequence positions. It utilizes the vector quantized-variational autoencoder (VQ-VAE) model [60] to encode the 3D protein structure as distinct and information-rich 3Di tokens. Each amino acid is assigned a token based on its distance and relative position to the nearest amino acids in the folded protein structure. Foldseek achieves this transformation through the identification of the nearest neighbors and the extraction of distinctive features for individual residues [49]. In this paper, we introduce Foldseek to accomplish the efficient encoding of 3D structures, as depicted in Fig. 5C. Concretely, we adopt Foldseek with the default setting of 20 3Di tokens. Aligning all residue sites, protein and antibody 3D structures are transformed into 3Di sequences (i.e., 1D sequences storing 3D structural information). Such technique fills the void in effective encoding of structure data and enables S2ALM to handle sequence-structure multi-level information in a hybrid and unified manner, promoting comprehensive antibody representation learning.
Hierarchical pre-training paradigm
Stage I: General sequence-structure learning
In pre-training stage I, we first tokenize the sequences and structures of proteins by an innovative multi-level vocabulary F=V1+V2. The original sequence alphabet V1 consists of 20 standard amino acids. A protein or antibody sequence can be denoted as s=s1s2…sn, where si∈V1 represents the 1D residue token at the ith site. Building upon the concept of Foldseek [20], the newly built structure alphabet V2 utilizes 20 distinct 3Di tokens to accomplish the generation of pseudo structural sequences (i.e., 3Di sequences). A protein or antibody structure can be denoted as a=a1a2…am, with aj∈V2 indicating the 3Di token at the jth site.
Building on the multi-level vocabulary, we obtain 1D and 3Di sequences and feed them into the model alternately. During pre-training stage I, we train S2ALM using the BERT-style masked language modeling (MLM) objective [40] to integratively learn from the 1D and 3Di sequences, enabling support for both sequence-level and structure-level tasks:
L1D−MLM=E∑i∈M−logpsis/M,
L3Di−MLM=E∑i∈M−logpaia/M,
where M is randomly masked positions and s/M,a/M denote the masked sequence where all masked positions have been replaced by the [MASK] token.
Specifically, for each 1D or 3Di sequence, 15% of the corresponding tokens are randomly masked and then predicted based on the remaining contextualized representation. Consequently, the loss function LI in pre-training stage I is formulated as follows, where L1D−MLM stands for 1D sequences and L3Di−MLM stands for 3Di sequences.
LI=L1D−MLM+L3Di−MLM.
Pre-training stage I endows the model with the capability to simultaneously identify both 1D and 3Di sequences. Furthermore, the efficient utilization of protein data in pre-training stage I effectively alleviates issues arising from insufficient antibody structure data. Due to the powerful generalization ability of large language models, the global structural constraints from proteins learned in stage I set the foundation for antibody-specific learning of sub-domain local constraints in stage II.
Stage II: Antibody-specific multi-level learning
After pre-training stage I, S2ALM has thoroughly comprehended 1D and 3Di sequences across the general protein domain. Subsequently in pre-training stage II, we can primarily focus on multi-level representation learning in the target antibody sub-domain. To better absorb comprehensive knowledge of antibody sequences and structures, exploring new pre-training mechanisms is worthwhile. Two multi-level learning objectives are introduced to inject different granularities of antibody-specific sequential and structural information into an ALM: sequence-structure matching (SSM) and cross-level reconstruction (CLR). The customized learning objectives facilitate the extraction of complex patterns and interdependency inherent in antibody sequences and structures.
SSM captures the coarse-grained alignment between antibody sequential and structural information. It is a binary classification task to predict whether a sequence-structure pair is matching or unmatching, as depicted in Fig. 1C. The model extracts representations of the corrupted antibody 1D and 3Di sequences and then exploits a linear layer to make classification on their matching relationships. SSM optimizes the following loss function:
LSSM=∑s˜a˜∈S,A˜Hys˜a˜p(Eθ(s˜a˜)),
where S,A˜ is the corrupted antibody dataset containing matched and unmatched sequence-structure pairs and H denotes the cross entropy loss function. Eθ and y represent parameterized encoder and matching ground truth, respectively.
CLR focuses on improving fine-grained understanding in antibody sequence-structure pre-training, which differs in reconstruction conditions from MLM in the “Stage I: General sequence-structure learning” section. Concretely, the paired antibody 1D and 3Di sequences are separately encoded by the model. Then, we randomly replace 15% of tokens with the [MASK] token in the 1D or 3Di sequence, while keeping the other level sequence unmasked. Eventually, as illustrated in Fig. 1D, hybrid information from both 1D and 3Di sequences serves as the CLR condition to make token-level predictions through a linear layer. CLR encourages the model to recover the corrupted 1D or 3Di sequences based on information from both levels, explicitly capturing the interrelated mechanism between antibody sequences and structures:
L1D−CLR=E∑i∈M−logpsis/Ma,
L3Di−CLR=E∑i∈M−logpaisa/M,
where M is randomly masked positions in 1D or 3Di sequences. L1D−CLR and L3Di−CLR subsequently measure the reconstruction costs of 1D and 3Di sequences. Therefore, the ultimate loss function LII in pre-training stage II is formulated as:
LII=LSSM+L1D−CLR+L3Di−CLR
With the groundwork laid in pre-training stage I, the tailored pre-training objectives in stage II facilitate S2ALM to effectively integrate antibody sequential and structural information, modeling comprehensive antibody representations. Overall, within this hierarchical pre-training paradigm, these 2 pre-training stages are complementary and indispensable to each other. Their synergy makes S2ALM a powerful antibody foundation model, further fostering holistic antibody understanding and generation. (See thorough pre-training details in Note S3.)
References
Less
1.
Taylor PC, Adams AC, Hufford MM, de la Torre I, Winthrop K, Gottlieb RL. Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies for treatment of COVID-19. Nat Rev Immunol. 2021;21(6):382–393.
2.
Ma X, Liang J, Zhu G, Bhoria P, Shoara AA, MacKeigan DT, Khoury CJ, Slavkovic S, Lin L, Karakas D, et al.SARS-CoV-2 RBD and its variants can induce platelet activation and clearance: Implications for antibody therapy and vaccinations against COVID-19. Research. 2023;6:0124.
3.
Li P, Yang Y, Wang Y, Zheng J, Chen F, Jiang M, Chou CK, Cong W, Li Z, Chen X. Anti-TNFR2 antibody-conjugated PLGA nanoparticles for targeted delivery of adriamycin in mouse colon cancer. Research. 2024;7:0444.
4.
Yin M, Zhou H, Zhu Y, Wu J, Wu W, Li M, Fu K, Wang Z, Hsieh C-Y, Hou T,et al. Synergy of GFlowNet and Protein Language Model Makes a Diverse Antibody Designer. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence; 2025; Philadelphia, PA, USA.
5.
Mullard A. FDA approves 100th monoclonal antibody product. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2021;20(7):491–495.
6.
Shuai RW, Ruffolo JA, Gray JJ. IgLM: Infilling language modeling for antibody sequence design. Cell Syst. 2023;14(11):979–989.e4.
7.
He H, He B, Guan L, Zhao Y, Jiang F, Chen G, Zhu Q, Chen CYC, Li T, Yao J. De novo generation of SARS-CoV-2 antibody CDRH3 with a pre-trained generative large language model. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):6867.
8.
Luo Y, Liu XY, Yang K, Huang K, Hong M, Zhang J, Wu Y, Nie Z. Toward unified AI drug discovery with multimodal knowledge. Health Data Sci. 2024;4:0113.
9.
Jing H, Gao Z, Xu S, Shen T, Peng Z, He S, You T, Ye S, Lin W, Sun S. Accurate prediction of antibody function and structure using bio-inspired antibody language model. Brief Bioinform. 2024;25(4):bbae245.
10.
Nguyen E, Poli M, Durrant MG, Kang B, Katrekar D, Li DB, Bartie LJ, Thomas AW, King SH, Brixi G, et al.Sequence modeling and design from molecular to genome scale with Evo. Science. 2024;386(6723):eado9336.
11.
Mou M, Pan Z, Zhou Z, Zheng L, Zhang H, Shi S, Li F, Sun X, Zhu F. A transformer-based ensemble framework for the prediction of protein-protein interaction sites. Research. 2023;6:0240.
12.
Zhang Y, Guan J, Li C, Wang Z, Deng Z, Gasser RB, Song J, Ou HY. DeepSecE: A deep-learning-based framework for multiclass prediction of secreted proteins in gram-negative bacteria. Research. 2023;6:0258.
13.
Zhou H, Yin M, Wu W, Li M, Fu K, Chen J, Wu J,Wang Z. ProtCLIP: Function-informed protein multi-modal learning. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence; 2025; Philadelphia, PA, USA.
14.
Liu Z, Qian W, Cai W, Song W, Wang W, Maharjan DT, Cheng W, Chen J, Wang H, Xu D, et al.Inferring the effects of protein variants on protein-protein interactions with interpretable transformer representations. Research. 2023;6:0219.
15.
Leem J, Mitchell LS, Farmery JH, Barton J, Galson JD. Deciphering the language of antibodies using self-supervised learning. Patterns. 2022;3(7):Article 100513.
16.
Ruffolo JA, Gray JJ, Sulam J. Deciphering antibody affinity maturation with language models and weakly supervised learning. arXiv. 2021. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2112.07782
17.
Olsen TH, Moal IH, Deane CM. AbLang: An antibody language model for completing antibody sequences. Bioinform Adv. 2022;2(1):vbac046.
18.
Wang D, Ye F, Zhou H. On pre-trained language models for antibody. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Learning Representations; 2023; Kigali, Rwanda.
19.
Lin Z, Akin H, Rao R, Hie B, Zhu Z, Lu W, Smetanin N, Verkuil R, Kabeli O, Shmueli Y, et al.Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic-level protein structure with a language model. Science. 2023;379(6637):1123–1130.
20.
van Kempen M, Kim SS, Tumescheit C, Mirdita M, Lee J, Gilchrist CLM, Söding J, Steinegger M. Fast and accurate protein structure search with Foldseek. Nat Biotechnol. 2024;42(2):243–246.
21.
Van der Maaten L, Hinton G. Visualizing data using t-SNE. J Mach Learn Res. 2008;9(86):2579–2605.
22.
Melnyk I, Chenthamarakshan V, Chen PY, Das P, Dhurandhar A, Padhi I, Das D. Reprogramming pretrained language models for antibody sequence infilling. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning; 2023; Honolulu, HI.
23.
Olsen TH, Boyles F, Deane CM. Observed antibody space: A diverse database of cleaned, annotated, and translated unpaired and paired antibody sequences. Protein Sci. 2022;31(1):141–146.
24.
Fagarasan S, Kinoshita K, Muramatsu M, Ikuta K, Honjo T. In situ class switching and differentiation to IgA-producing cells in the gut lamina propria. Nature. 2001;413(6856):639–643.
25.
Abramson J, Adler J, Dunger J, Evans R, Green T, Pritzel A, Ronneberger O, Willmore L, Ballard AJ, Bambrick J, et al.Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature. 2024;630(8016):493–500.
26.
Mason DM, Friedensohn S, Weber CR, Jordi C, Wagner B, Meng SM, Ehling RA, Bonati L, Dahinden J, Gainza P, et al.Optimization of therapeutic antibodies by predicting antigen specificity from antibody sequence via deep learning. Nat Biomed Eng. 2021;5(6):600–612.
27.
Rives A, Meier J, Sercu T, Goyal S, Lin Z, Liu J, Guo D, Ott M, Zitnick CL, Ma J, et al.Biological structure and function emerge from scaling unsupervised learning to 250 million protein sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2021;118(15):Article e2016239118.
28.
Rao RM, Liu J, Verkuil R, Meier J, Canny J, Abbeel Sercu T, Rives A. MSA transformer. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning; 2021; virtual.
29.
Ghraichy M, von Niederhäusern V, Kovaltsuk A, Galson JD, Deane CM, Trück J. Different B cell subpopulations show distinct patterns in their IgH repertoire metrics. eLife. 2021;10:Article e73111.
30.
Meffre E, Casellas R, Nussenzweig MC. Antibody regulation of B cell development. Nat Immunol. 2000;1(5):379–385.
31.
Mroczek ES, Ippolito GC, Rogosch T, Hoi KH, Hwangpo TA, Brand MG, Zhuang Y, Liu CR, Schneider DA, Zemlin M, et al.Differences in the composition of the human antibody repertoire by b cell subsets in the blood. Front Immunol. 2014;5:96.
32.
Bashford-Rogers R, Bergamaschi L, McKinney E, Pombal DC, Mescia F, Lee JC, Thomas DC, Flint SM, Kellam P, Jayne DRW, et al.Analysis of the B cell receptor repertoire in six immune-mediated diseases. Nature. 2019;574(7776):122–126.
33.
Kunik V, Ashkenazi S, Ofran Y. Paratome: An online tool for systematic identification of antigen-binding regions in antibodies based on sequence or structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:W521–W524.
34.
Prihoda D, Maamary J, Waight A, Juan V, Fayadat-Dilman L, Svozil D, Bitton DA. BioPhi: A platform for antibody design, humanization, and humanness evaluation based on natural antibody repertoires and deep learning. MAbs. 2022;14(1):2020203.
35.
Elnaggar A, Heinzinger M, Dallago C, Rehawi G, Wang Y, Jones L, Gibbs T, Feher T, Angerer C, Steinegger M, et al.ProtTrans: Toward understanding the language of life through self-supervised learning. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2022;44(10):7112–7127.
36.
Li L, Gupta E, Spaeth J, Shing L, Bepler T, Caceres RS. Antibody representation learning for drug discovery. arXiv. 2022. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.02881
37.
Kenlay H, Dreyer FA, Kovaltsuk A, Miketa D, Pires D, Deane CM. Large scale paired antibody language models. arXiv. 2024. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.17889
38.
Engelhart E, Emerson R, Shing L, Lennartz C, Guion D, Kelley M, Lin C, Lopez R, Younger D, Walsh ME. A dataset comprised of binding interactions for 104,972 antibodies against a SARS-CoV-2 peptide. Sci Data. 2022;9(1):653.
39.
Chen B, Cheng X, Geng Y, Li S, Zeng X, Wang B, Gong J, Liu C, Zeng A, Dong Y, et al. xTrimoPGLM: Unified 100B-scale pre-trained transformer for deciphering the language of protein. bioRxiv. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.05.547496
40.
Devlin J, Chang MW, Lee K, Toutanova K. BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv. 2019. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1810.04805
41.
Liu G, Zeng H, Mueller J, Carter B, Wang Z, Schilz J, Horny G, Birnbaum ME, Ewert S, Gifford DK. Antibody complementarity determining region design using high-capacity machine learning. Bioinformatics. 2020;36(7):2126–2133.
42.
Singh R, Im C, Qiu Y, Mackness B, Gupta A, Sorenson T, Sledzieski S, Erlach L, Wendt M, Nanfack YF, et al. Learning the language of antibody hypervariability. bioRxiv. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.04.26.538476
43.
Barton J, Galson JD, Leem J. Enhancing antibody language models with structural information. bioRxiv. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.12.569610
44.
Jin W, Wohlwend J, Barzilay R, Jaakkola TS. Iterative refinement graph neural network for antibody sequence-structure co-design. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Learning Representations; 2022; virtual.
45.
Raybould MIJ, Kovaltsuk A, Marks C, Deane CM. CoV-AbDab: The coronavirus antibody database. Bioinformatics. 2021;37(5):734–735.
46.
Madani A, Krause B, Greene ER, Subramanian S, Mohr BP, Holton JM, Olmos JL Jr, Xiong C, Sun ZZ, Socher R, et al.Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families. Nat Biotechnol. 2023;41(8):1099–1106.
47.
Adolf-Bryfogle J, Kalyuzhniy O, Kubitz M, Weitzner BD, Hu X, Adachi Y, Schief WR, Dunbrack RL. RosettaAntibodyDesign (RAbD): A general framework for computational antibody design. PLOS Comput Biol. 2018;14(4):Article e1006112.
48.
Nijkamp E, Ruffolo JA, Weinstein EN, Naik N, Madani A. ProGen2: Exploring the boundaries of protein language models. Cell Syst. 2023;14(11):968–978.e3.
49.
Su J, Han C, Zhou Y, Shan J, Zhou X, Yuan F. SaProt: Protein language modeling with structure-aware vocabulary. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Learning Representations; 2024; Vienna, Austria.
50.
Yin M, Zhou H, Zhu Y, Lin M, Wu Y, Wu J, Xu H, Hsieh CY, Hou T, Chen J, et al. Multi-modal CLIP-informed protein editing. arXiv. 2024. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.19296
51.
Zhu Y, Wu J, Li Q, Yan J, Yin M, Wu W, Li M, Ye J, Wang Z, Wu J. Bridge-IF: Learning inverse protein folding with Markov bridges. arXiv. 2024. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.02120
52.
Shi Z, Deng R, Yuan Q, Mao Z, Wang R, Li H, Liao X, Ma H. Enzyme commission number prediction and benchmarking with hierarchical dual-core multitask learning framework. Research. 2023;6:0153.
53.
Suzek BE, Wang Y, Huang H, McGarvey PB, Wu CH, Consortium U. UniRef clusters: A comprehensive and scalable alternative for improving sequence similarity searches. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(6):926–932.
54.
Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(1):235–242.
55.
Varadi M, Anyango S, Deshpande M, Nair S, Natassia C, Yordanova G, Yuan D, Stroe O, Wood G, Laydon A, et al.AlphaFold protein structure database: Massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50(D1):D439–D444.
56.
Steinegger M, Söding J. Clustering huge protein sequence sets in linear time. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):2542.
57.
Abanades B, Wong WK, Boyles F, Georges G, Bujotzek A, Deane CM. ImmuneBuilder: Deep-learning models for predicting the structures of immune proteins. Commun Biol. 2023;6:575.
58.
Ruffolo JA, Chu LS, Mahajan SP, Gray JJ. Fast, accurate antibody structure prediction from deep learning on massive set of natural antibodies. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):2389.
59.
Dunbar J, Krawczyk K, Leem J, Baker T, Fuchs A, Georges G, Shi J, Deane CM. SAbDab: The structural antibody database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:D1140–D1146.
60.
Aaron vdO, Oriol V, Koray K. Neural discrete representation learning. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems; 2017; Long Beach, CA.
61.
Achiam J, Adler S, Agarwal S, Ahmad L, Akkaya I, Aleman FL, Almeida D, Altenschmidt J, Altman S, et al. GPT-4 technical report. arXiv. 2023. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.08774
62.
Radford A, Kim JW, Hallacy C, Ramesh A, Goh G, Agarwal S, Sastry G, Askell A, Mishkin P, Clark J, et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning; 2021; virtual.
63.
Paszke A, Gross S, Massa F, Lerer A, Bradbury J, Chanan G, Killeen T, Lin Z, Gimelshein N, Antiga L, et al. PyTorch: An imperative style high-performance deep learning library. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems; 2019; Vancouver, BC, Canada.
64.
Rajbhandari S, Rasley J, Ruwase O, He Y. ZeRO: Memory optimizations toward training trillion parameter models. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis; 2020; Atlanta, GA.
65.
Wang Z, Zhang Q, Yu H, et al. Multi-level protein structure pre-training with prompt learning. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Learning Representations; 2023; Kigali, Rwanda.
66.
Chen C, Zhou J, Wang F, Liu X, Dou D. Structure-aware protein self-supervised learning. Bioinformatics. 2023;39(4):btad189.
67.
Zhang Z, Xu M, Lozano A, Chenthamarakshan V, Das P, Tang J. Enhancing protein language model with structure-based encoder and pre-training. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Learning Representations Machine Learning for Drug Discovery Workshop; 2023; virtual.
68.
Lee Y, Yu H, Lee J, Kim J. Pre-training sequence, structure, and surface features for comprehensive protein representation learning. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Learning Representations; 2023; Kigali, Rwanda.
69.
Heinzinger M, Weissenow K, Sanchez JG, Henkel A, Steinegger M, Rost B. ProstT5: Bilingual language model for protein sequence and structure. bioRxiv. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.23.550085
70.
Gao K, Wu L, Zhu J, Zhu J, Peng T, Xia Y, He L, Xie S, Qin T, Liu H, He K, et al. Pre-training antibody language models for antigen-specific computational antibody design. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining; 2023; Long Beach, CA.
Appendix
Less
Year 2025 volume 8 Issue 8
PDF
12
6
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.34133/research.0721
  • Receive Date：2024-12-15
  • Online Date：2026-11-02
  • Published：2025-08-20
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received：2024-12-15
  • Revised：2025-04-09
  • Accepted：2025-05-07
Affiliations
    1College of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
    2Institute of Wenzhou, Zhejiang University, Wenzhou, China.
    3Zhejiang Cuisine Bird Supply Chain Management Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China.
    4College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
    5School of Public Health, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
    6AI Thrust, Information Hub, HKUST(GZ), Guangzhou, China.
    7Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging Artificial Intelligence, Hangzhou, China.

Corresponding:

* Address correspondence to: (J.C.);
(C.-Y.H.);
(T.H.);
(J.W.)
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/research/EN/10.34133/research.0721
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family		 属数
Number of
genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)		 属
Genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT
Links
Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read
Collections
Updates
Events
News
Multimedia
About
About Us
Contact
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
100081
010-62662699(Operation and Technical Support)
qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House