收藏切换
Immunotherapies for Aging and Age-Related Diseases: Advances, Pitfalls, and Prospects
收藏切换
PDF
Muyang Yang1, Shipeng Wu2, Jiasi Zhang3, Lisen Lu1, Deqiang Deng1, Qianfeng Xia1, Jonathan F. Lovell4, *, Xiujuan Shi2, *, Honglin Jin1, 2, *
Research. Vol 8 Article ID 0866
Less
收藏切换
Research. Vol 8 Article ID 0866
• Review Article •
Immunotherapies for Aging and Age-Related Diseases: Advances, Pitfalls, and Prospects
Full
Muyang Yang1, Shipeng Wu2, Jiasi Zhang3, Lisen Lu1, Deqiang Deng1, Qianfeng Xia1, Jonathan F. Lovell4, *, Xiujuan Shi2, *, Honglin Jin1, 2, *
Affiliations
  • 1NHC Key Laboratory of Tropical Disease Control, School of Life Sciences and Medical Technology, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan 571199, China.
  • 2College of Biomedicine and Health and College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China.
  • 3Institution of Pediatric Hematology & Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430030, China.
  • 4Department of Biomedical Engineering, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA.
About Author:

† These authors contributed equally to this work.

Published: 2025-09-20 doi: 10.34133/research.0866
Outline
收藏切换

Aging is characterized by a gradual decline in the functionality of all the organs and tissues, leading to various diseases. As the global population ages, the urgency to develop effective anti-aging strategies becomes increasingly critical due to the growing severity of associated health problems. Immunotherapy offers novel and promising approaches to combat aging by utilizing approaches including vaccines, antibodies, and cytokines to target specific aging-related molecules and pathways. In this review, we summarize the recent advancements of immunotherapies to eliminate senescence cells and senescence-associated secretory phenotypes (SASPs). Next, we describe immunotherapies against age-related diseases containing neurodegenerative diseases, vascular pathologies, type 2 diabetes (T2D), arthritis, osteoporosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), fibrosis, skin aging, and cancer, detailing the targets, corresponding manipulations, and clinical trials. Related problems including immunosenescence, serious adverse effects, the duality of function of senescent cells and SASPs, and inherent problems of immunotherapy are also discussed, suggesting directions for improvement. In addition to recent development and challenges in the field, we describe a blueprint of personalized aging immunotherapy by multi-omics, Big Data, artificial intelligence (AI), and nanobots in the future, aiming to inspire the development of novel strategies for healthy aging.

Muyang Yang, Shipeng Wu, Jiasi Zhang, Lisen Lu, Deqiang Deng, Qianfeng Xia, Jonathan F. Lovell, Xiujuan Shi, Honglin Jin. Immunotherapies for Aging and Age-Related Diseases: Advances, Pitfalls, and Prospects[J]. Research, 2025 , 8 (9) : 0866 - . DOI: 10.34133/research.0866
Aging begins with the gradual accumulation of “primary damage” to the genome, shortening of telomeres, shifting epigenetics, declining protein homeostasis, and mitochondria disfunction [1]. These insults elicit cellular senescence—an antagonistic response that, when immune surveillance fails with age, sustains senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP)-mediated chronic low-grade inflammation, amplifies damage, promotes fibrosis, and ultimately manifests as age-related diseases [2,3]. The global elderly population is projected to rise, with those aged 65 and above reaching nearly 20% by 2050 [4]. Advancing age is one of the most critical factors elevating the risk of numerous chronic and life-threatening diseases. Moreover, a weakened immune system contributes to the prevalence of many endogenous diseases while making the elderly more vulnerable to infections. Thus, it is urgent to explore the mechanisms of aging and develop anti-aging strategies.
Intervention measures for aging and age-related diseases have attracted much attention due to their potential for healthcare and economic benefits. Exercise and calorie restriction not only slow aging itself but also markedly lower the incidence and delay the onset of many age-related diseases [5]. It is an endogenous behavioral intervention, whereas the present review focuses on exogenous therapeutic approaches, such as drugs and immunotherapies. As the fundamental mechanisms of cellular and organ senescence have been revealed, numerous small-molecule drugs and gene therapies have been developed with proven efficacy in anti-aging strategies. Senolytics provide rapid and direct depletion of senescent cell burden, yet they are constrained by hematologic toxicities, off-target effects, and variable efficacy across senescent cell subtypes. Senomorphics/senostatics blunt SASP secretion without eliminating the cells; however, their long-term utility is limited by a lack of specificity, requirement for continuous dosing, rebound SASP upon withdrawal, and the potential to chronically dampen inflammatory pathways that underpin immune surveillance and normal tissue repair [6]. Gene therapies can induce off-target effects and elevate the risk of carcinogenesis due to unpredictable gene insertion [7]. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop innovative approaches to combat aging and related diseases with minimized side effects.
Immunotherapy, after a century of development, has revolutionized the treatment of many diseases such as infections, cancers, and autoimmune diseases. Multidisciplinary advancements in immunology, molecular biology, biomedical engineering, and computer science have made immunotherapy more precise and specific, expanding its indications. A recent study on mice demonstrated that immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) can enhance senescence surveillance, indicating the potential of immunotherapies for addressing aging [8]. Senescent cells and aging-related microenvironmental features, such as DNA damage, oncogene expression, mitochondrial metabolic changes, and the production of SASPs, provide targets for immunotherapy to eliminate and reshape the microenvironment [9]. Furthermore, immunotherapies can also reverse immunosenescence, which manifests as chronic low-grade inflammation and diminished reactivity toward pathogens and malignancies [10]. These features highlight the potential of immunotherapy in delaying aging and related diseases with fewer side effects.
This review summarizes the latest progress in aging immunotherapy, including vaccines, adoptive cell transfer (ACT), antibody blockade, and cytokine intervention, while discussing the toxicity issues and limitations encountered in practice. Finally, it describes the prospects of aging immunotherapy, providing new targets and strategies for addressing aging and extending lifespan.
Cellular senescence is an irreversible process affecting various pathways, leading to morphological, cyclical, metabolic, and oxidative damage changes (Fig. 1). Among the multiple contributing factors identified to date, the most important include physical and chemical damage, telomere shortening, oncogene activation, and metabolic disorders that activate p53 and up-regulate p16/p21 as well as anti-apoptotic proteins of the B cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) family [9]. Aging-related pathways lead to mitochondrial and lysosomal dysfunction, impairing metabolism and promoting reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, thus accelerating senescence [6]. Senescent cells can transmit aging signals to normal cells via abnormal metabolites, microRNAs, SASPs, membrane-bound bodies, and nonvesicular multi-component macromolecules [11]. These alterations result in cellular functional decline and the increase of senescence markers including p16, p21, β-galactosidase (β-gal), and SASPs.
Studies indicate that eliminating senescent cells and their SASPs can restore tissue vitality, prolong lifespan, and delay the onset of many age-related diseases [12]. To reduce nontargeted side effects, identifying aging-related molecules highly expressed in senescent individuals and low in nonsenescent ones is crucial. Recently, new senescence markers have been discovered and used as immunotherapy targets, clearing senescent cells, hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), and senescence-associated cytokines through vaccines, antibodies, and ACTs [13–19] (Fig. 2). Despite some reports of adverse reactions, the significant effects on aging and innovative designs offer new strategies for healthy aging.
Strategies for rejuvenating the immune system through the clearance of senescent T cells are crucial for combating aging, thus requiring specific targets on these cells. CD153/CD30 signaling in senescent T cells can accelerate the expansion of tertiary lymphoid structures in aged mice, leading to kidney damage and the development of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) [20]. To inhibit the signaling, Yoshida et al. [14] developed a CD153 vaccine composed of CD153 peptide–keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) and the adjuvants [aluminum or CpG-oligodeoxynucleotide (ODN)]. The vaccine containing CpG-ODN can induce anti-CD153 antibodies, clear CD153+ senescent T cells, and improve insulin resistance and glucose tolerance in high-fat diet (HFD)-induced obese mice. The effectiveness of CpG-ODN instead of aluminum indicated the importance of killing CD153+ senescent T cells by T helper 1 (Th1) response and cellular immunity (Fig. 2A). Additionally, immunoglobulin G2 (IgG2) antibody induced by vaccination can mediate complement-dependent cytotoxicity of senescent T cells. This study demonstrated the feasibility of an anti-aging vaccine targeting CD153. Nevertheless, the vaccine system may promote the progression of autoimmune responses via activation of Th1 cell and CD8+ T cells. Moreover, the interaction between CD30 and CD153, as well as the cis interaction between CD153 and T cell receptor (TCR)/CD3 complex, is crucial for triggering inflammation against pathogens such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis [21]. Blocking CD153 may increase the susceptibility of the elderly to tuberculosis infection. Further research is needed to balance the effective clearance of senescent T cells with the minimization of impacts on autoimmunity and anti-infection to determine the optimal dose, drug compatibility, and administration timing for individual aging and immune status.
In addition to CD153, glycoprotein nonmetastatic melanoma protein B (GPNMB) is another crucial factor associated with aging and age-related diseases. As an endogenous type-1 transmembrane glycoprotein, GPNMB is highly expressed in macrophages and microglia [22]. In 2021, Suda et al. [13] identified GPNMB as a potential candidate for aging-related antigens by transcriptome data from the elderly. In the Gpnmb-diphtheria toxin receptor (DTR) HFD mouse model, metabolic abnormalities and atherosclerosis were alleviated in the absence of GPNMB+ cells. Then, a GPNMB vaccine containing KLH-conjugated peptides from GPNMB and Titer Max Gold (adjuvant) was administrated to HFD mice, showing a down-regulation of β-gal, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A (CDKN1A), and CDKN2A in visceral adipose tissue. The GPNMB vaccine induced high level of GPNMB antibody, eliminating GPNMB+ cells through antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC), thereby alleviating tissue senescence and age-related phenotypes, and extending the lifespan of mice (Fig. 2A). Similar to CD153, GPNMB also plays a vital role in physiologic function such as immune response initiation, lysosomal integrity, and vascular endothelial cell (VEC) replication [22,23]. Blocking GPNMB may impair vascular endothelial repair, leading to internal hemorrhage. The mechanism of GPNMB in various physiologic processes needs to be thoroughly elucidated, which serves as the foundation to optimize GPNMB vaccination schedule for minimum side effects.
Immune checkpoints provide co-inhibitory signals to prevent excessive activation of the immune response and autoimmunity [24]. Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) blockade has been successful in cancer treatment and age-related diseases. Onorati et al. [25] found that senescent cells highly express PD-L1 and up-regulate its expression in nonsenescent cells via the activation of the Janus kinase (JAK)–signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway, unveiling the relationship between PD-L1 and senescence. Additionally, PD-L1+ senescent cells can resist T cell-mediated clearance and cause senescence-associated inflammation by producing high levels of SASPs [8]. PD-L1 plays a key role in the aging process mainly because its expression is affected by factors such as SASPs, low early 2 factor (E2F) activity, and impaired proteasome activity caused by aging [8]. Meanwhile, the senescence marker p16 also participates in maintaining the stability of PD-L1 by weakening its ubiquitin-dependent degradation mediated by cell cycle kinase CDK4/6 [26]. Wang et al. [8] treated p16-creERT2-tdTomato transgenic mice with anti-PD-1 antibodies, reducing p16+ cell numbers in the lung, liver, and kidney and improving age-related physiological aging markers. Thus, anti-PD-1 treatment can reduce the inhibitory effects of PD-L1+ senescent cells on T cells, achieving normal immune surveillance, senescent cell (SC) elimination, and improvement of age-related phenotype (Fig. 2A). Although anti-PD-1 antibodies are effective in addressing aging, further research is needed to determine the optimal dose and treatment duration to prevent immune-related adverse events (irAEs).
Under physiological conditions, the immune surveillance system controls the number of senescent cells via the cytotoxicity of lymphocytes and the phagocytosis of macrophages and granulocytes [27]. Among them, natural killer (NK) cells play a key role in mediating senescent cell clearance through NK group 2 member D (NKG2D)–ligand interaction [28]. However, with immune aging, the numbers, subpopulations, secretory profiles, and functions of NK cells change, leading to a reduction in senescent cell clearance. This has prompted research on ACTs of NK cells against aging. In a small pilot study of five cancer patients, Chelyapov et al. [29] conducted infusions of autologous propagated and activated NK cells into patients, significantly reducing the number of senescent cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and reshaping the cytokine profile while also lowering the levels of SASPs and the number of senescent T cells. The senescent environment, characterized by hormones, cytokines, chemokines, pro-aging cell subpopulations, etc., may impair the efficiency of SC clearance and potentially reshape the phenotypes and function of transferred NK cells. Bai et al. [17] developed an ACT by dopamine-induced activation of autologous NK cells with enhanced NK cell cytotoxicity in aged mice (Fig. 2A). Dopamine not only is crucial for neuroimmune communication but also plays an important role in immune regulation [30]. NK activation can be mediated by interactions between D1-like dopamine receptors (D1-DRs) and dopamine, a process that is hindered in aging due to decreased dopamine levels [31]. According to the fact, a nonapeptide Acein was applied to assist autologous NK cell adoptive transfer via specifically interacting with angiotensin-converting enzyme I (ACE I) to trigger dopamine production without significant neurotoxicity. The results showed that after NK cell ACT and Acein treatment, the levels of p16, p21, and SASPs in multiple tissues decreased, and the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) level improved, supporting the potential of NK cell infusion in anti-aging.
Next to NK cells, cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) with genetic engineering like chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T can also be manipulated to clean senescent cells with special markers. In senescent cells, the high expression of NKG2D ligands (NKG2DLs) not only mediates senescent cell depletion by NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity but also provides a potential target for CAR-T therapy. Yang et al. [32] designed the extracellular domain of NKG2D as CAR (NKG2D-CAR) for recognition of NKG2DLs (Fig. 2A). Animal experiments demonstrated that NKG2D–CAR-T cell administration significantly slowed down senescence progression in aging mice and nonhuman primates as evidenced by reduction of aging markers, alleviation of fat loss, osteoporosis and movement disorders, and improvement of hepatic and renal function without observable systemic toxicity. Another team identified urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) as a new target for CAR to clear senescent cells [18] (Fig. 2A). The modified CAR-T cells effectively cleared uPAR+ senescent cells, improved liver function in liver fibrosis mouse models, reduced the level of SASPs in peripheral blood, and prolonged the lifespan of mice. By single-cell analysis of cells from human liver, fat, and pancreas, the numbers of uPAR+ senescent cells were demonstrated to increase with age, indicating the feasibility and potential of uPAR-CAR-T therapy in clinical application [33]. However, transient elevations in liver enzymes were observed in nonhuman primates treated with CAR-T cells, likely attributable to on-target/off-tumor effects [34]. Administration of interleukin-4 (IL-4) restored CAR-T antitumor potency while mitigating hepatotoxicity [35].
With age, immune function declines, which is related to immunosenescence, and senescent immune cells produce SASPs, mediating persistent low-level inflammation and inducing senescence in other cells. The clearance of senescent immune cells has attracted interest, but their continuous generation after clearance highlights the importance of understanding the formation and development mechanisms of senescent immune cells. HSCs, the progenitors of most immune cells, can regulate the differentiation and proportion of various immune cell types. The role of HSCs has stimulated the scientific community to explore the relationship between HSCs and aging to better understand the mechanisms of immunosenescence and design new intervention measures. In 2005, Rossi et al. [36] discovered differences in HSCs between young and old mice, with myeloid-biased HSCs (my-HSCs) dominating the HSC pool in old mice and humans, leading to reduction in lymphoid-to-myeloid output weakened lymphocyte production and enhanced myeloid cell production. The higher frequency and faster accumulation of mutations associated with myeloid hematopoiesis, compared to those related to lymphoid hematopoiesis, may partly explain my-HSCs bias [37]. Wang et al. [38] discovered that tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) activates extracellular signal–regulated kinase (ERK)–erythroblast transformation specific proto-oncogene 1 (ETS1) signaling pathway in HSCs of old mice, resulting in high expression of IL-27Ra, and thereby skewing these IL-27Ra+ HSCs toward myeloid lineage. The finding enlightened the strategies against aging by screening targets for elimination of age-related HSCs. In 2024, Ross et al. [39] identified CD150, CD62p, and Neogenin-1 as their markers across independent datasets of gene expression. Animal experiments showed that the administration of CD150, CD62p, and Neogenin-1 antibodies effectively depleted my-HSCs by ADCC, rebalancing the numbers of common lymphoid progenitors and common myeloid progenitors (Fig. 2B). The aging phenotypes and inflammatory markers were also down-regulated. Antibody treatment significantly increased the number of circulating naive T cells and mature B cells, rejuvenating the adaptive immunity of aged mice to resist infection. However, increased lymphocyte production in the elderly theoretically may promote the incidence of lymphoid cancers, and antibody-mediated my-HSC clearance may damage tissues or physiological functions. Therefore, precise targeting of my-HSCs to avoid toxicity is necessary, and synNotch-CAR technology can be utilized to avoid “on-target/off-cell-type” toxicity [40].
Disruption of the cytokine profile is a key feature of aging, resulting from the generation of senescent cells and inflammaging. Inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, IL-1, and TNF-α can trigger persistent inflammation, leading to tissue and organ damage, fibrosis, and aging [41]. Meanwhile, transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) is involved in immune regulation and is also associated with DNA damage, oxidative stress, and fibrosis [42]. Blocking these cytokines using antibodies, corresponding free receptors, or small-molecule inhibitors is considered to be a potential strategy to alleviate age-related diseases.
IL-11, a member of the IL-6 cytokine family, has recently been identified as a novel target for inhibiting the progression of aging [19]. Early research indicated that IL-11 promotes the development of megakaryocyte colonies and T cell-dependent specific B cells [43]. Its important role in autoimmune diseases and fibrosis was later unveiled [44]. In 2024, Widjaja et al. [19] found that IL-11 levels increase with age, suggesting that IL-11 can serve as a biomarker of aging. By regulating the ERK–adenosine 5′-monophosphate-activated kinase (AMPK)–mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) axis, IL-11 accelerates aging pathologies at the cellular, tissue, and organismal levels, manifesting as increased liver and abdominal fat accumulation and decreased muscle mass and strength. In a mouse model, the administration of anti-IL-11 inhibited inflammation in visceral white adipose tissue, expanding the lifespan of female mice by 25% and of male mice by 22.5% (Fig. 2C). Mechanism studies showed that IL-11 blockade can reduce the activity of multiple pathways related to aging and pathways involved in cardiovascular disease, muscle strength, lipid metabolism, telomere attrition, and mitochondrial damage, indicating that it can be a promising therapeutic strategy for aging [19].
Aging can lead to the onset of various diseases, such as neurodegenerative diseases, vascular pathologies, type 2 diabetes (T2D), arthritis, osteoporosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), fibrosis, skin aging, and cancer. Advances in immunotherapies have shown promise in ameliorating age-related diseases, potentially contributing to healthy aging. This section focuses on the mechanisms and applications of immunotherapies for age-related diseases.
Neurodegenerative diseases are characterized by the progressive loss and functional decline of neurons within the central nervous system. These include Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), Lewy body dementia, Huntington’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and progressive supranuclear palsy. Many immunotherapies have been developed for AD and PD in clinical research, which will be described in the following sections (Table 1).
AD is a neurodegenerative disease causing severe, irreversible cognitive decline and progressive disorientation. Although the complete pathogenesis of AD is unclear, amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) are recognized as key pathological hallmarks. They are related to the deposition of β-amyloid peptides, the aggregation of hyperphosphorylated tau proteins, and neuroinflammation [45]. Traditional treatments for AD primarily involve cholinesterase inhibition and antagonism of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) to restore normal synaptic neurotransmission and memory function [46]. As more critical mechanisms of AD are uncovered, therapies that target AD-related factors through the immune system have gradually become a research hotspot for intervention.
The first attempt of immunotherapy for AD was conducted in 1999, when PDAPP mice immunized with the 42-amino-acid form of Aβ (Aβ42) exhibited reduced amyloid plaques, astrocytosis, and neuronal dystrophy. This sparked scientific interest in AD active immunotherapy [47]. To avoid excessive immune activation, it is essential to carefully select immunogens, adjuvants, and carriers to induce moderate immune responses. Immunogen design has focused on the N terminus of Aβ42, a B cell epitope with weak T cell immunogenicity activation. Adjuvants like alum, which specifically activate humoral immunity, have replaced QS-21 [48,49]. Ongoing or terminated clinical trials of Aβ42 N-terminal vaccines include various vaccines, and most studies have confirmed humoral immune activation through high Aβ42 antibody levels in animals and patients [50,51]. Besides Aβ42, the 40-amino-acid form of Aβ (Aβ40) is also a key target for AD treatment, with related vaccines showing good safety and tolerability [52]. Moreover, several tau aggregate-targeting vaccines have shown efficacy in animal models, with some entering clinical trials [53–55]. Beyond Aβ and tau, vaccines like GV1001, Bacille Calmette–Guérin vaccine (BCG), and Protollin are being explored for potential therapeutic effects by activating innate immunity or other unknown pathways [50]. For detailed information on all AD vaccines, see Fig. 3.
Due to the potential risk of meningoencephalitis, research has gradually shifted to safer passive immunotherapy with antibodies. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) currently under clinical evaluation include those targeting Aβ aggregates and tau aggregates [54] (Fig. 3A and B). Positron emission tomography shows that most anti-Aβ antibodies reduce brain Aβ burden, whereas evidence for cognitive benefit from anti-tau antibodies is still limited [56]. In addition to Aβ and tau, certain immune cells are also involved in AD progression and may become therapeutic targets. In early AD patients, CD38+CD8+ T cells significantly increase in the blood and central nervous system, potentially exerting neurotoxicity [57]. Daratumumab (a CD38 antibody) can eliminate such toxic T cells. In contrast, microglia, as innate immune cells in the central nervous system, exert neuroprotective effects by phagocytosing Aβ. The agonistic antibody AL002 activates microglia by binding to triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2), enhancing their chemotaxis, phagocytosis, lipid metabolism, energy metabolism, and proliferation [58,59]. Phase II data for AL002 and anti-CD38 approaches are pending publication.
Despite significant progress in AD immunotherapy, many mysteries remain regarding the mechanisms of AD and its immunotherapy. First, how Aβ and tau aggregates affect cognition is not fully understood, as some AD patients have no Aβ deposition or have Aβ plaques without cognitive decline [60]. Second, it is necessary to identify the optimal individualized treatment targets, as patients differ in genetic background, environmental exposure, AD staging, and comorbidities, highlighting the need for personalized detection and treatment. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and spatial transcriptomics will help accurately identify AD-related factors, and the accumulation of autopsy data can enhance artificial intelligence (AI) prediction and simulation of AD components.
Moreover, neuroinflammation caused by immune system and metabolic changes is crucial in AD progression, and it is necessary to characterize the immune microenvironment in AD patients [61]. Finally, the mechanisms for alleviating the side effects of immunotherapy need to be studied in depth. Although most therapies aim to avoid activating T cell immunity, antibodies from humoral immunity may mediate neurotoxicity through ADCC. Continuous elucidation of the mechanisms of side effects will help reduce the toxicity of immunotherapy.
The pathogenesis of PD is complex, with aggregated α-synuclein playing a crucial role. This protein aggregation triggers a series of events leading to neuronal death and clinical manifestations of the disease. Recent studies indicate that both central and peripheral immune responses are involved in disease progression. Microglia, the resident immune cells of the central nervous system, can be activated into pro-inflammatory phenotypes, exacerbating neuroinflammation and neuronal damage. Peripheral immune cells, such as T cells, may also play a role in the disease process. Some studies have detected autoantibodies and T cells that target α-synuclein in PD patients [62].
Given the central role of α-synuclein, many immunotherapy studies have focused on targeting this protein. mAbs that bind to α-synuclein, such as cinpanemab and prasinezumab, are under clinical trial evaluation, aiming to prevent its aggregation and promote clearance from the brain [63,64]. In a phase 2 trial, cinpanemab showed reductions in CSF α-synuclein aggregates, but no significant clinical benefit was observed in early-stage Parkinson’s patients [63]. Additionally, active immunotherapy strategies are being explored. For example, UB-312 has shown promise in early-phase clinical trials by stimulating the patient’s immune system to produce antibodies against α-synuclein, potentially offering a long-term management solution for PD [65]. The development of conformation-specific vaccines is also a promising direction. These vaccines aim to mimic epitopes present only on the surface of pathological α-synuclein fibrils. Results showed that antibodies produced in immunized mice could recognize α-synuclein fibrils and brain homogenates from Parkinson’s patients [66].
In conclusion, immunotherapy holds promise as a potential disease-modifying therapy for PD, with current research focusing on developing targeted therapies for the underlying pathology of the disease. Methods such as mAb, active immunotherapies, and conformation-specific vaccines are being explored.
As age increases, factors like oxidative stress, chronic inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and key pathway dysregulation contribute to the prevalence of vascular pathologies common in the elderly [67]. These accumulating pathologies can lead to strokes, coronary heart disease, and vascular dementia, increasing elderly mortality. Immunotherapies are under investigation to mitigate vascular pathologies. Here, we summarize immunological interventions for hypertension, abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), and atherosclerosis as representative examples (Fig. 4). Related clinical trials are listed in Table 2.
Hypertension, characterized by sustained blood pressure above 130/80 mmHg, is a major health threat, particularly in the elderly. Traditionally, overactivation of the sympathetic nervous system and the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) is considered a key contributor of hypertension. In addition to chemical antagonists, immunotherapies are being used to block related receptors in the systems.
In the first 2 decades of the 21st century, the vaccines targeting the RAAS were tested in animals and clinical trials. For example, the vaccine ATRQβ-001, targeting the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R), showed high efficiency in resisting hypertension and preventing various cardiovascular diseases in animal models [68]. However, these vaccines’ long half-life and ability to induce RAAS-targeting antibodies may affect blood pressure stability [69]. Additionally, vaccines targeting the sympathetic nervous system have shown potential in hypertension treatment, such as selecting endothelin-A receptors (ETARs) and α1-adrenergic receptors (α1-ARs) as immunogens to regulate vessels and nerves, thereby combating pulmonary and aortic hypertension in animal models [70,71]. Beyond active immunization, key factors in the sympathetic nervous system and RAAS can also be blocked via passive immunization. For instance, mAb against the C terminus of human angiotensin-(1–12) can lower arterial pressure in humanized rat models [72]. Another research group focused on using antibodies to block G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to alleviate hypertension, screening and modifying humanized nanobodies like AT118i4 as AT1R antagonists, offering new therapeutic avenues [73].
Despite the great success of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers in hypertension treatment, about 40% of patients still fail to normalize their blood pressure according to the results of related clinical trials [74]. Over the past decade, increasing evidence indicates that alterations in the immune system may contribute to the development of hypertension [75]. In detail, various environmental and lifestyle factors facilitate the formation of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and hypertension-related neo-antigens, leading to antigen-presenting cell (APC) activation and neoantigen presentation. The mobilization of innate immunity triggers adaptive immune responses against vasculature, including CTL cytotoxicity, increased central memory CD8+ T cells, plasma cell-derived autoantibodies, and elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines. On the contrary, immunosuppressive cells like invariant NK T (iNKT) cells, regulatory T cells (Tregs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and CD4+ choline acetyltransferase (ChAT)+ T cells protect against vascular damage by expressing anti-inflammatory factors. In particular, CD4+ChAT+ T cells not only inhibit the generation and function of Th1, Th17, γδT cells, and CD8+T cells but also exert vasodilatory effects via cholinergic neuroregulation [76]. The cycles of damage and repair result in vascular collagen deposition and fibrosis, accelerating vascular sclerosis and dysfunction [75]. More studies need to be conducted to clarify the precise markers of related immune cells and find optimal dose for minimal adverse events.
Additionally, hypertension is more prevalent among the elderly and is associated with aging-related dysfunction of the sympathetic nervous system, the RAAS, and chronic inflammation. Immunotherapies to clear senescent cells and block SASPs may slow the progression of hypertension, but further research is needed to verify their efficacy and safety.
AAA, characterized by an abdominal aortic diameter enlargement to 1.5 times normal or reaching 3 cm, can cause sudden death due to aortic rupture and hemorrhage. The incidence of AAA increases with age, making ruptured AAA an important, though uncommon, cause of sudden death in older adults. However, effective therapies for AAA remain scarce, and long-term survival rates remain low even after surgical intervention [77]. In recent decades, the abnormality of the immune system and chronic inflammation is critical in AAA progression. Infiltration of M1 macrophages, neutrophils, and lymphocytes into vessels mediates vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) apoptosis and extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation via immune signaling activation and pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion [77]. This establishes an inflammatory microenvironment and promotes AAA development. Additionally, angiotensin II, a regulator of blood pressure, has been shown to exacerbate vascular inflammation by influencing macrophage polarization, increasing matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) expression, and promoting the differentiation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) into myeloid cells [78–80]. These insights into AAA pathogenesis have laid the foundation for developing new therapeutic strategies.
Although immunotherapies are not yet widely accepted as clinical treatments for AAAs, numerous studies have explored them as alternatives to suppress AAA formation and progression. Theoretically, rebalancing pro-inflammatory factors (e.g., MMP-2, MMP-9, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-17, TNF-α, CCL2, and CCL3) and anti-inflammatory factors (e.g., IL-4 and IL-10) can reshape the inflammatory microenvironment and improve the condition of AAA. However, given the multi-system roles of cytokines and chemokines, blocking or adding them may cause off-target immune effects [81,82]. Beyond targeting the AAA microenvironment, vaccines against angiotensin II (Ang II)–AT1R pathway have shown preventive effects against AAA initiation in rodent models by blocking vascular growth and inflammation [50]. In a rat model, Kurashiki et al. [83] immunized rats with Ang II peptides conjugated to KLH, and the vaccine significantly reduced macrophage infiltration and inflammatory responses in AAA walls by inhibiting nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling. Another vaccine, ATRQβ-001, targeting AT1R, has also been shown to prevent AAA initiation and progression in mice [84]. To date, no immunotherapy has demonstrated significant clinical efficacy for AAA.
As the major cause of cardiovascular disease, atherosclerosis is a chronic vascular lesion resulting from the increase of cholesterol-containing low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particle in the arterial wall, which can be induced and augmented by genetic factors, exposure, and metabolic disorder [85]. Inflammatory immune cells and cytokines have been identified as key contributors to the formation and enlargement of atherosclerotic plaques [86]. Briefly, monocyte-derived macrophages, VSMCs, and resident immunocyte ingest lipoprotein to form foam cells, creating plaque necrotic cores [87]. Lipid antigens in plaque, including apolipoprotein B (ApoB) and cholesterol crystals, enhance innate immunity, promoting inflammatory and chemokine production and driving atherosclerosis progression [87,88]. Beyond inflammation, aging contributes significantly to the progression of atherosclerosis. Senescent VECs cause vasoconstriction and inflammation via increased endothelin and ROS [89]. Senescent VSMCs reduce mechanosensation and ECM remodeling, leading to arterial stiffness and vascular microenvironment changes [90]. Simultaneously, immunosenescence causes immune metabolic and functional disorders, increasing myeloid-derived immune cells and activating innate immunity [91]. These factors together create a unique microenvironment conducive to atherosclerosis.
According to the pathogenesis, many immunotherapies have been designed to target different key factors involved in atherosclerosis. Immunization against LDL has shown anti-atherosclerotic effects in animal models, pioneering atherosclerosis immunotherapy research [92]. However, cardiovascular benefits in clinical trials have been limited. Strategies targeting oxidized LDL (ox-LDL), ApoB, phospholipase A2 (PLA2), lectin like oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor 1 (LOX1), proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), cholera toxin B subunit (CTB), and a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin type 1 motif 7 (ADAMTS7) through vaccination, antibodies, or inhibitors have further confirmed the effectiveness of eliminating lipoprotein abnormalities [50]. Among these agents, evolocumab and alirocumab, targeting PCSK9, exhibit high efficiency to lower cholesterol and inhibit the progression of atherosclerosis [93,94].
Direct interventions to the vascular immune microenvironment can also reduce the incidence of atherosclerosis and slow the prognosis, such as using broad-spectrum immunosuppressants and precise immunomodulation targeting specific molecules. For example, canakinumab, a mAb against IL-1β, can lower recurrent cardiovascular event rates but failed to decrease the total mortality because of elevated risk of infection after the antibody administration [95]. Subsequent studies have developed more specific anti-IL-1α mAbs and IL-1 receptor antagonists to reduce atherosclerotic inflammation. However, the impact of IL-1 receptor antagonists on atherosclerosis, mortality, and cardiovascular adverse events requires further study [96]. Moreover, IL-6 antagonists have been used to suppress atherosclerotic inflammation and have shown efficacy in cardiovascular disease related to ST-elevated myocardial infarction and chronic kidney disease [97]. A phase II trial of IL-6 antibody ziltivekimab showed that IL-6 blockade reduced median high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) by more than three-quarters in patients at high atherosclerotic risk, indicating the potential of the therapy [98].
In addition to cytokines, chemokines are also therapeutic targets for atherosclerosis. Blocking related chemokines can inhibit inflammatory immunocyte recruitment, especially macrophages [88]. Additionally, balancing the adaptive immune response is effective to improve vascular lesion. This can be achieved by inhibiting macrophage, effector T and B cell functions via proliferation inhibitors, costimulatory molecule antibodies, and B cell depletion, or by increasing Treg numbers and function with low-dose IL-2 and CD27 agonists [87,99].
T2D is a chronic metabolic and inflammatory disease linked to aging. It is characterized by a triad of β cell dysfunction, insulin resistance, and chronic low-grade inflammation, resulting in persistent hyperglycemia and related complications of cardiovascular and central nervous system [100]. Traditional treatments for T2D focus on the control of carbohydrate metabolism and the protection of β cells. However, as the pathogenesis of T2D becomes clearer, immunotherapy has emerged as a potential alternative treatment. Immunotherapeutic approaches mainly focus on 3 aspects: metabolic regulation, β cell protection, and anti-inflammatory treatment.
The promotion of carbohydrate metabolism is one of the key strategies for T2D treatments. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) play an essential role in maintaining glucose homeostasis via elevating the production and sensitivity of insulin, which can be degraded by dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 (DPP4) [101,102]. With aging, increased expression of DPP4 destroys the balance of carbohydrate metabolism [103]. A therapeutic vaccine developed by Pang et al. [104], which couples the DPP4 E3 region with KLH, has significantly reduced the level of blood glucose and up-regulated plasma insulin and pancreatic insulin content in HFD-fed mice and KK-Ay and db/db mouse strains without serious adverse events. Additionally, the metabolic regulator adiponectin, secreted by adipocytes, improves metabolism by activating AMPK and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α (PPAR-α) [105]. It can also induce the browning of subcutaneous adipose tissue and improve carbohydrate metabolism by facilitating M2 macrophage polarization [106]. The antibodies that activate adiponectin receptor (AdipoR) have significantly reduced plasma glucose levels and insulin resistance in HFD mice, indicating the feasibility of immunotherapy against AdipoR [107]. Besides, immunotherapies against other metabolic molecules such as calcitonin gene-related peptide and prorenin have also shown the potential for treating diabetes by improving metabolism [108,109].
Protecting β cells is another therapeutic strategy for T2D. Misfolded aggregates of islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP) may contribute to β cell failure and the development of T2D [110]. It is shown that the overexpression of IAPP reshapes the islet transcriptome, characterized by the down-regulation of β cell identity genes and the up-regulation of inflammation-related gene expression [111]. In 2020, Roesti et al. [112] designed a virus-like particle (VLP) vaccine against the N terminus of IAPP, which inhibited IAPP fibril formation by inducing high-affinity antibodies in mice, which have low affinity for soluble IAPP and do not interfere with its physiological function. Studies have also shown that mAb generated from biopsies of T2D patients, which recognize pathogenic IAPP aggregates, prevent hyperglycemia and IAPP fibril formation in mouse model [113]. Furthermore, immunizing mice with human IAPP fibril immunogens stabilized by nucleobindin 1 technology has generated specific mAb against human IAPP fibrils, which can extend the survival time of diabetic mice [114].
Chronic inflammation, especially in elderly, plays a crucial role in metabolic disorder and β cell damage. The activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome and the maturation of IL-1β have been shown to mediate key pro-inflammatory effects [115]. Canakinumab, a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved IL-1β mAb, can dramatically reduce the level of inflammatory markers, such as hs-CRP and IL-6, but has not been effective in reducing the incidence of T2D [116]. In contrast, an IL-1β vaccine carrying VLPs has shown improvement in blood glucose and CRP levels in a preclinical and clinical study, although long-term effects remain to be evaluated [117]. It should be noted that long-term blockade of IL-1β by immunotherapy may jeopardize the normal immune function and elevate the risk of severe upper respiratory infections, highlighting the importance of determining the optimal dose and dosing schedule [118].
Arthritis, generally classified into rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoarthritis (OA), is characterized by joint inflammation and surrounding tissue damage, leading to chronic pain, disability, and functional limitations. It remains a leading cause of global disability with significant healthcare costs. The elderly population exhibits a high prevalence of arthritis due to accumulation of senescent cells, immunosenescence, inflammaging, metabolic and endocrine disorders, and intestinal dysbacteriosis. Immunotherapy has gained great success to treat arthritis by remodeling of inflammatory immune microenvironment over the past 2 decades. In this part, we will generate the current mainstream and novel strategies of immunotherapy against RA and OA.
RA is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by synovial inflammation and joint destruction, with a global prevalence of 0.5% to 3% [119]. Its pathogenesis involves complex interactions among genetic predisposition, environmental factors (e.g., smoking), and immune dysregulation, leading to the production of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies, synovial inflammatory cell infiltration (e.g., macrophages, T cells, and B cells), and excessive release of pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6), ultimately resulting in joint damage [120]. Traditional clinical management of RA primarily consists of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs; e.g., methotrexate). However, these agents remain associated with systemic adverse effects (e.g., hepatotoxicity and infection risk), frequent administration, long-term drug tolerance, and high costs [121]. Approximately 5% to 20% of patients are unresponsive or intolerant to current therapies, underscoring the urgent need for more precise and efficient treatment strategies.
The development of antibody engineering revolutionizes the immunotherapy for RA. Biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) have gained great success in treating RA, including TNF-α inhibitors (e.g., infliximab), IL-6 receptor blockers (tocilizumab), and B cell-depleting agents (rituximab). Emerging evidence supports abatacept [CTL-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4)–Ig] for intercepting pre-RA stages by modulating T cell costimulation, demonstrating reduced progression from autoantibody-positive at-risk states to clinical RA [122]. Next to bDMARDs, vaccines carrying rapamycin and peptides from RA-related antigens have been proven to alleviate RA by inducing immune tolerance. DR4-AL179, the vaccine loaded with the immunodominant type II collagen COL2 peptide (259–273) that binds to major histocompatibility complex II (MHC), exhibited robust effectiveness in suppressing arthritis progression in mouse model of RA [123]. Another vaccine against citrullinated antigen was observed to ameliorate RA by down-regulating inflammatory Th cells and cytokines, and dampening the dysregulated V(D)J recombination in mouse model [124]. Compared to immune tolerance induction, adoptive transfer of immunocytes including regulatory dendritic cells (DCs), Treg, and CAR-T against B cells can directly improve the inflammatory microenvironment in RA [125–127]. Recent studies highlight mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) as promising therapeutic agents for RA due to their dual immunomodulatory and tissue repair capacities [128]. Nevertheless, their low efficacy and unpredicted side effects restrict the clinical application. Many efforts have been made to elevate the efficacy and safety by genetic engineering, hypoxia-activated nanoagent assistance, photothermal therapy combination, and MSC-derived extracellular vesicle (EV) therapy [129].
In summary, immunotherapy has represented promising potential in RA treatment. Future directions of related research encompass the integration of gene-editing technologies, the development of smart stimuli-responsive materials, and the systematic integration of multi-omics data to decipher the immune microenvironment. These advancements aim to design precision-tailored therapeutic regimens for RA.
OA, a prevalent degenerative joint disease intricately related to aging, affects various joints including the knee, hip, ankle, hand, and spine, significantly impacting patients’ quality of life. Its pathogenesis centers on progressive cartilage degradation, accompanied by subchondral bone remodeling, chondrocyte-mediated disruption of the synovial microenvironment, and chronic low-grade inflammation driven by immunosenescence and increased SASPs [130,131]. Inflammatory cytokines, including TNF, IL-1, IL-6, and IL-17, exert significant effects on bone and joint deterioration, while some chemokines such as CCL2, CCL3, and CCL4 facilitate the infiltration of inflammatory immune cells into the joint, exacerbating the OA condition [132,133]. Although analgesics can provide short-term symptom relief, they cannot reverse the pathological process, and surgical risks are particularly high for elderly patients, especially those of advanced age [134].
Immunotherapy, which modulates the immune state of patients, has enhanced the treatment of OA and has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach. NSAIDs, as basic therapy, can suppress joint inflammation but are associated with individual variability and cardiovascular risks [135]. Cytokine blockers (e.g., diacerein and adalimumab) can alleviate pain but have not been effective in slowing disease progression, possibly due to the complex signaling pathways in OA. Given this, the combination of multiple cytokine inhibitions are being tested to enhance efficacy. Adoptive transfer of anti-inflammatory cells has also been proven to more effectively relieve OA. MSC therapy has shown potential by secreting immunosuppressive factors such as indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), TGF-β, IL-10, and PD-L1, and working synergistically with exosomes to promote M2 macrophage polarization, inhibit T cells, and induce regulatory B cells [136,137]. Phase I/II clinical trials have confirmed that bone marrow/adipose-derived MSCs can improve cartilage thickness and provide analgesia [138,139]. Specifically, mononuclear cells from blood or spleen are induced into chondrogenic-activated T cells (termed as CATs) in activation media containing chondrocyte lysates and immunosuppressants. A coculture protocol of CATs with adipose-derived MSCs has shown reparative and anti-inflammatory effects on synovial cartilage in preclinical models [140].
Osteoporosis, a systemic skeletal disorder, is characterized by progressive reduction in bone mineral density and deterioration of bone microarchitecture, collectively contributing to elevated bone fragility and fracture susceptibility. The pathogenesis of this condition primarily stems from an imbalance in bone remodeling, where osteoclast-mediated bone resorption chronically exceeds osteoblast-mediated bone formation. This imbalance is further compounded by age-related physiological changes such as hormone disorder, cellular senescence, and chronic low-grade inflammation [141]. Osteoporosis predominantly affects older populations, especially post-menopausal women and men aged 65 years and above, in whom age-related bone loss accelerates [142].
The immunotherapies targeting key factors of osteogenesis and osteoclasis have been demonstrated effective in alleviating osteoporosis. Denosumab, a fully humanized mAb, exerts its therapeutic effect by binding to the receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL)—the pivotal molecular mediator governing osteoclastogenesis and osteoclastic activation [143]. As the first FDA-approved mAb for osteoporosis, denosumab has shown anti-fracture efficacy comparable to bisphosphonates, with 50% to 70% reduction in vertebral fractures and 40% reduction in hip fractures [144]. However, the mAb exhibits complete pharmacological reversibility upon treatment discontinuation [145]. This characteristic necessitates careful clinical management, as abrupt cessation without subsequent sequential antiresorptive therapy may result in a rapid rebound increase in bone resorption markers. Romosozumab, another FDA-approved mAb, represents a dual-action anabolic therapy for osteoporosis. It selectively binds to sclerostin, stimulating bone formation and simultaneously inhibiting bone resorption through Wnt signaling pathway modulation [144]. Clinical trials have demonstrated its superior anti-fracture efficacy compared to traditional anti-resorptives, with significant increases in bone mineral density (BMD) [146]. Nevertheless, a phase 3 trial revealed potential cardiovascular risks including myocardial infarction [147]. Like denosumab, the transient anabolic effects of romosozumab necessitate sequential therapy with anti-resorptive agents like bisphosphonates to maintain BMD gains [144,145].
COPD, the world’s third leading cause of death (WHO, 2023), is a progressive and debilitating respiratory condition marked by chronic airway inflammation, alveolar-capillary unit failure, and declining lung function. Aging is a significant risk factor for COPD as it leads to alterations in the compartments containing respiratory epithelium, lung progenitor cells, pulmonary immune cells, and the interstitium, thus impacting the structure and function of the respiratory system. Molecular mechanism studies showed that enhanced SASPs such as IL-6 and IL-8 induced by inflammaging aggravate the damage of lung tissue [148]. Cellular senescence contributes to dysfunction of lung cells and stem cell exhaustion that decreases the regenerative capacity [149]. Furthermore, mitochondrial dysfunction caused by aging aggravates oxidative stress, promoting DNA damage and DAMP release, thereby driving inflammation. Thus, inhibiting inflammation and anti-aging are central to COPD treatment [150].
Immunotherapies for COPD are not yet widely used clinically. Recent clinical trials showed that triple combinations such as fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) can significantly lower the rate of moderate-to-severe acute exacerbations in COPD patients by inhibiting immune response, yet more research is needed to confirm their efficacy [151]. Beyond corticosteroid, resveratrol, a plant-derived anti-inflammatory agent, has proven effective in relieving COPD symptoms [149]. In animal models, resveratrol down-regulated the production of IL-6, IL-8, IL-17, TNF-α, etc., and mitigated oxidative and fibrotic processes, revealing its anti-aging properties [152,153]. Blocking the type 2 inflammatory pathway is also a promising strategy. For example, dupilumab, an mAb against IL-4Rα, can block IL-4 and IL-13 signaling to reduce eosinophil activation, thereby attenuating type 2 inflammation in patients with COPD. Phase III trials BOREAS and NOTUS demonstrated that dupilumab significantly reduces exacerbation rates and markedly improves lung function in COPD patients, with a favorable safety profile [154]. Approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in July 2024, it stands as the world’s first biologic therapy specifically targeted for COPD. Other mAbs against IL-4, IL-13, IL-33, IL-5, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) have also been tested in clinical trials to explore its efficacy and safety [155–158] (Table 3). Besides, some novel assembling immunosuppressive agents have been demonstrated to reduce inflammation and improve lung function in an animal model of COPD. Guo et al. [159] developed poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles (PLGA NPs) loading ONX-0914 (an immunoproteasome-specific inhibitor) to alleviate airway inflammation and improve lung function by macrophage polarization inhibition through interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4), nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor-1 (NRF1), and NRF2–p62 axis. Future research will focus on identifying novel type 2 inflammatory biomarkers and non-type 2 inflammatory targets.
Characterized by aberrant accumulation of ECM, fibrosis results from dysregulated post-injury repair responses and can progress to multi-organ failure. Epidemiological and molecular studies indicate that increased senescent cells, SASP levels, and inflammation are primary causes of fibrosis [160]. During aging, rising damaged cells and declining immunosurveillance lead to senescent cell accumulation. SASP from these cells promotes fibroblast and myofibroblast proliferation/transformation, boosting ECM protein synthesis and causing organ fibrosis [161]. The TGF-β1/Smad pathway impacts multiple downstream pathways, including mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), p53, and Wnt/β-catenin, thereby inducing fibrosis via inflammation (e.g., activating the IL-17A/IL-1β/TGF-β1 axis) [162]. Aging-related ROS increases further activate TGF-β signaling, creating a positive feedback loop. Moreover, integrins and chemokines play key roles in fibrosis development by mediating cell–ECM interactions and immune responses, directly binding to ECM components, and controlling its remodeling [160].
Fibrosis is usually caused by autoimmune and metabolic diseases like systemic sclerosis, autoimmune hepatitis, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), nephritis, and Dupuytren’s disease. Clinically, corticosteroids and chemotherapeutic immunosuppressants are used to alleviate symptoms, but their effectiveness is limited. Recently, specific blocking of pro-fibrotic factors has shown potential. Antibodies neutralizing TGF-β, IL-4, IL-13, IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α, CCL2, and chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 2 (CCR2)/CCR5 have been evaluated for efficacy in clinical trials, with some combination blockades showing promise [160]. All the related clinical trials of immunotherapies are listed in Table 4.
In addition, the immunotherapies against fibroblasts also show promising effects to inhibit fibrosis. For example, CAR-T cells targeting fibroblast activation protein (FAP) inhibit cardiac fibrosis and restore heart function by eliminating myofibroblasts in a mouse model [163]. FAP CAR mRNA delivery is also a viable alternative, avoiding in vitro culture and adoptive T cell transfer in mice [164]. Computer-assisted epitope prediction has identified a disintegrin and metalloprotease 12 (ADAM12) and GLI1 as key fibroblast markers, presented by MHC class I molecules. Vaccines targeting ADAM12 and GLI1 have shown potential in mobilizing cytotoxic T cells to eliminate fibroblasts and prevent pulmonary fibrosis in animal models, indicating that vaccination may be a potential anti-fibrotic strategy [165].
A comprehensive understanding of fibrosis mechanisms may lead to more effective immunotherapies. Single-cell multi-omics approaches have identified new cell subsets involved in fibrosis progression, such as TREM2+CD9+ macrophages, segregated nucleus-containing atypical monocytes (SatMs), and ACKR1+PLVAP+ endothelial cells [166]. In summary, new technologies facilitate novel discovery of unveiled accelerators of fibrosis, which may become new targets for immunotherapies.
Skin aging, driven by time and environmental factors, manifests as structural, cellular, and molecular changes. It involves reduced cellular proliferation, altered dermal components, and decreased ECM elements, such as collagen, elastin, and glycosaminoglycans. Furthermore, mitochondrial damage and inflammation exacerbate ROS-induced skin damage [167]. Senescent immune cells in the skin reshape the microenvironment, creating a state of low-grade and hyporesponsive immunity. Increased Th17 cells, macrophages, and SASPs worsen inflammation and disrupt skin microbiota balance, while decreased cytotoxic CD4+ T cells and NK cells hinder senescent cell clearance [168]. Skin aging has been linked to systemic aging and related diseases in preclinical models. Thus, treating skin aging is not only cosmetically significant but also highly valuable for health [169]. Therefore, the therapies for skin aging are valuable for both cosmetic and systemic health outcomes.
Recent investigations to decipher the key molecules and cells in aging skin provide good targets for immunotherapy. Solá et al. [170] found that aged skin has more IL-17-producing immunocytes than young skin by single-cell RNA sequencing. Anti-IL-17A/F antibodies can inhibit the IL-17A/F-NF-κB pathway to prevent inflammation and delay epidermal aging in aged mice. CD4+ cytotoxic T cell subset has been identified as key immune cells for clearing senescent skin cells [171]. These CTLs, drawn by CCL9, patrol the skin and kill senescent cells by recognizing human cytomegalovirus-derived glycoprotein B (HCMV-gB). Adoptive transfer using CD4+ CTLs or HCMV-gB-CAR CD4+ CTLs in a mouse model is being explored. As exogenous antigens, HCMV-gB accumulates in SCs since HCMV can establish a lifelong latent infection and reactivate during aging. Vaccine against HCMV-gB may elevate the efficiency of senescent cell clearance in elderly with HCMV infection.
Cancer is closely related to aging. The incidence of cancer continues to rise until the age of 85, highlighting the crucial role of aging in cancer development [172]. Aging promotes cancer through mechanisms such as oxidative stress, accumulation of DNA damage, increased senescent cells and SASPs, immunosenescence, stem cell exhaustion and dysfunction, genomic instability, epigenetic changes, and ECM remodeling. Population aging will lead to a rapid increase in cancer incidence. The decline in immune function in elderly patients and age-related immune dysfunction create a pro-tumor microenvironment, thereby reducing the efficacy of immunotherapy in elderly cancer patients (see Fig. 5). Age-related immune dysfunction includes a reduction in DCs and TCR repertoire, an increase in M2 macrophages and MDSCs, up-regulation of inflammatory cytokine levels, and changes in the ECM, all of which may affect the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy. Therefore, remodeling the tumor microenvironment is a key approach to enhancing antitumor immunity in elderly cancer patients.
The great success of ICB in cancer treatment highlights the importance of tumor microenvironment remodeling. Immune checkpoint inhibitors can relieve the immunosuppression of tumor cells on T cells, enhance the immune system’s attack on tumor cells, and also help clear senescent cells. Nivolumab (PD-1 mAb), ipilimumab (anti- CTLA-4 mAb), and relatlimab (anti-LAG-3 mAb) have been proven effective in controlling tumor growth in multiple clinical trials. In ICB therapy, clinical evidence reveals a paradoxical phenomenon: Elderly cancer patients often show higher sensitivity. A meta-analysis of 25 ICB trials indicated that elderly patients had a better response rate than younger patients [173]. This is attributed to an Akkermansia-centered gut microbiome configuration (enterotype E) unique to older individuals, which enhances the dendritic cell–CD8+ T cell axis and thereby provides a novel microbiome-based target for precision immunotherapy. Despite this promising phenomenon in clinical experiments of ICB therapy, preclinical models have revealed limitations. In elderly mice, PD-1/CTLA-4 inhibitors failed to eradicate tumors, which was associated with a decline in DC activation capacity and CD8+ T cell exhaustion [174]. This discrepancy between clinical and preclinical results highlights the complexity of translating age-specific mechanisms into practical applications.
The accumulation of age-related immunosuppressive TREM2+ macrophages is associated with ICB resistance, as observed in a metastatic cancer cohort [175]. Targeting these cells with cell cycle-dependent kinase inhibitors or nanoregulators that can disrupt mitochondrial calcium homeostasis may reverse immunosuppression. Additionally, inhibiting IL-1R signaling with antibodies can disrupt the generation of IL-1α-producing monocyte-derived macrophages and prolong the overall survival of elderly cancer patients [176]. During aging, the number and function of bone marrow HSC change, leading to increased myeloid output and elevated MDSC numbers [177]. MDSCs are important immunosuppressive cells in the tumor microenvironment. They suppress the function and proliferation of T cells by secreting immunosuppressive factors (such as IL-10 and TGF-β), consuming l-arginine, and generating ROS, thereby weakening the antitumor immune response [178]. Therapies targeting myeloid cells have been shown to improve tumor control and the cytotoxicity of CD8+ T lymphocytes in elderly patients by activating conventional type 1 DC (cDC1), indicating the potential of rejuvenating senescent immune cells [179]. In recent years, with the deepening understanding of the relationship between senescent cells and immunotherapy, as well as the hindrance of senescent cells and SASPs to tumor immunity, anti-aging therapies have emerged as a new anti-cancer treatment approach. Many studies have confirmed that eliminating senescent cells and SASP can improve the tumor microenvironment and enhance antitumor immune responses [180]. A study developed a nanotechnology-based platform (mGL392) that precisely targets lipofuscin in senescent cells for clearance. Experiments demonstrated that mGL392 could significantly reduce the accumulation of senescent cells, lower the risk of recurrence, and exhibit excellent anti-cancer effects in a melanoma model [181]. Additionally, blocking senescence-related factors such as BCL-2 and mTOR can inhibit tumor growth and neutralize drug resistance [182,183]. Eliminating SASP (such as anti-IL-6 antibodies) can synergize with immune checkpoint inhibitors to promote antitumor immunity and eliminate irAEs, which may be applicable to elderly patients resistant to immunotherapy [184]. Moreover, conventional therapies (e.g., radiation and chemotherapy) often drive tumor cells into senescence. Recent work positions therapy-induced senescence followed by selective senescent cell removal as an adjunct to standard cancer therapy, enhancing efficacy, reducing relapse, and limiting side effects [185]. While senolytic or senescence-modulating agents, including navitoclax, have shown tumor suppression in animal models, they carry acute toxicities—most notably dose-limiting thrombocytopenia and neutropenia [185]. Combining senescent cell-clearing immunotherapies with standard oncologic treatments offers a promising strategy to mitigate these liabilities.
Despite the advancement of cancer immunotherapy for elderly, related clinical translation faces hurdles, including underrepresentation of elderly patients in clinical trials. An analysis of FDA-registered ICB trials (2018–2022) revealed inadequate inclusion of older adults, particularly those with comorbidities or frailty [186]. This gap limits data on dose optimization, toxicity management, and biomarkers. For instance, neoantigen burden—a predictor of ICB response—may decline with age due to reduced DNA repair efficiency, yet quantification of immunoediting patterns suggests that age-specific neoantigen landscapes could serve as predictive biomarkers [187].
In conclusion, optimizing immunotherapy for elderly patients requires a dual focus: (a) deciphering age-specific interactions between immunosenescence, the tumor microenvironment, and treatment modalities, and (b) designing clinical trials with robust geriatric assessments. Leveraging nanotechnology, senescence biology, and precision biomarkers will be critical to unlocking the full potential of cancer immunotherapy for elderly patients.
The biochemical aging program typically begins when molecular-level primary damage triggers cellular senescence; once age-related immune surveillance wanes, SASP-driven inflammation amplifies the damage, promotes fibrosis, exhausts organ reserve, and culminates in age-related diseases. Compared with chemicals regulating age-related pathways, immunotherapy can precisely eliminate senescent cells and reshape the immune microenvironment. Senescent cells overexpress proteins like CD153, GPNMB, IL-11, uPAR, and PD-L1, which can be targeted by CAR-T cells, antibodies, and vaccines for selective elimination [8,14,18,19,23]. Methods such as NK cell injection, my-HSC depletion, and inflammatory cytokine blockade have shown promise for rejuvenating the immune system in animal models and clinical trials [28,39]. However, immunotherapies for age-related diseases must consider their unique pathologies and select appropriate targets. Despite the potential of SC clearance and immune reshaping, immunotherapies face challenges, including the following: (a) Heterogeneous senescent cell and SASP targets in different elderly populations make it hard to find universal aging targets, leading to therapy ineffectiveness in some individuals. (b) Immunosenescence affects the efficiency of immunotherapy by attenuated immune function and adoptive cell exhaustion (Table 5). Although immune reprogramming is possible, full immune restoration remains challenging. (c) Specific immunotherapies may harm nonsenescent cells expressing age-related molecules. As most aging markers are senescence-associated rather than specific antigens, such therapies can cause severe side effects by eliminating nonsenescent cells. Identifying aging-specific antigens is key to solving this problem. (d) Senescent cell and SASP clearance might disrupt physiological processes and even accelerate aging, as some senescent cells and SASPs are vital for tissue function. (e) Immunotherapy issues may be more severe in elderly patients. Vaccines with low immunogenicity and MHC affinity may fail due to immunosenescence. Moreover, CAR-T therapy can cause fatal cytokine storms in those with weakened compensatory and repair abilities. Similar obstacles exist for age-related disease immunotherapies, which also have more complex etiologies. Further research is essential to understand aging-driven disease development and lay the groundwork for prevention and treatment.
Beyond senescent cells, SASPs, and other characteristic aging molecules, longevity-associated genes play crucial roles in counteracting aging across multiple physiological systems, particularly within the immune, vascular, and cardiac systems. This indicates significant promise for immunotherapies targeting these genes to induce rejuvenation. Specific longevity-associated genes, such as Sirtuins, RGP1, CASP8, and DIMT1, reduce cellular damage and stress by regulating oxidative stress responses, DNA repair, and protein homeostasis [188,189]. LAV-BPIFB4, prevalent in long-lived individuals, improves microvascular structure and function, restores pericyte function, and effectively slows cardiovascular aging [190]. Furthermore, mitochondrial translation genes, along with genes involved in proteolysis and PI3K–Akt signaling, have been demonstrated to contribute to an extended lifespan [188,191]. Epigenetically, regulators like SET-26, HCF-1, and FLOT1 modulate DNA replication, metabolism, and inflammation through chromatin remodeling and epigenetic modifications, affecting lifespan and the rate of epigenetic aging acceleration [192,193]. To date, no immunotherapy targeting longevity-associated genes has entered clinical trials for aging. Future immunotherapies may therefore integrate strategies such as reprogramming-induced rejuvenation or fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) targeting the gut microbiome to restore systemic immune competence and combat vascular and cardiac aging [194].
Multi-omics analysis of aging is crucial for future research, diagnosis, and treatment. For example, Ma et al. [195] created a high-resolution spatial transcriptomic atlas of aging, revealing that increased tissue structural entropyand loss of integrity drive the formation of aging-sensitive spots, characterized by IgG-secreting cell accumulation. This offers new tissue-level aging intervention strategies. Another team’s protein atlas of aging highlighted changes in many ECM and mitochondrial membrane proteins.
According to the Information Theory of Aging, aging can be reversed by epigenetic reprogramming, with epigenomics helping to uncover environmental exposure effects on aging [196]. All multi-omics data can be integrated into a central “senomics” platform for discovering new targets for aging intervention.
With technological advances, personalized treatment platforms are the future of aging therapy, helping to overcome the current hurdles (Fig. 6). First, there’s an urgent need for diagnostic criteria for aging-related biomarkers. Despite much research, in vivo senescent cell identification and characterization face conceptual, methodological, and practical challenges. To address this, some studies have proposed minimal information for in vivo senescence experiments (MIIVSE), which leverages multi-omics and advanced analytical tools to better assess in vivo cellular senescence biomarkers. The classical senescence markers initially identified and established in cell culture models have limited utility in natural tissue microenvironments or “in situ” experiments. Therefore, the minimum information for cellular senescence experimentation in vivo (MICSE) is proposed to improve the evaluation of cellular senescence biomarkers in vivo by multi-omics (containing genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, lipidomics, metabolomics, and phenomics) and advanced analysis tools (including high content analysis, methods of multi-omics data integration, and machine learning) [197]. Using MIIVSE and MICSE data, AI can detect and assess patients’ aging status. Individual senomic maps can then be used to find suitable immunotherapy targets by evaluating factors like expression abundance, MHC affinity, immunogenicity, cross-reactivity, and physiological function. Next, AI can assist to design drugs targeting aging-related molecules and predict next-generation antibodies and antigens using computational protein design and machine learning [198]. Finally, nanorobots are being developed to monitor senomic profiles in real time and deliver drugs to aging-affected areas for immunotherapy.
Because immune responses are recognized to differ markedly between sexes, all immunotherapeutic strategies for aging and age-related diseases should consider sex stratification where feasible. Women typically display more robust innate and adaptive immunity and higher vaccine-induced antibody titers, but are more susceptible to autoimmune disorders; men, in contrast, mount weaker inflammatory responses, recover more slowly from infection, and are at greater risk of severe infection-related complications [199].
In conclusion, immunotherapy for aging and age-related diseases faces many challenges. Fully understanding the link between aging and age-related diseases is vital for developing new treatments. Personalized immunotherapy, based on senomics, bioinformatics, AI, and nanotechnology, may transform aging treatment and promote healthy aging.
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China(82473363)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China(82272851)
  • Young Scientists Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China(22307043)
  • the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(2662024JC005)
  • the China postdoctoral Science Foundation(2023M731223)
  • the China postdoctoral Science Foundation(2023T160253)
1.
López-Otín C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G. Hallmarks of aging: An expanding universe. Cell. 2023;186(2):243–278.
2.
Franceschi C, Campisi J. Chronic inflammation (inflammaging) and its potential contribution to age-associated diseases. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014;69(Suppl 1):S4–S9.
3.
Giannoula Y, Kroemer G, Pietrocola F. Cellular senescence and the host immune system in aging and age-related disorders. Biom J. 2023;46(3):Article 100581.
4.
Dzau VJ, Inouye SK, Rowe JW, Finkelman E, Yamada T. Enabling healthful aging for all—The National Academy of Medicine Grand Challenge in Healthy Longevity. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(18):1699–1701.
5.
Aversa Z, White TA, Heeren AA, Hulshizer CA, Saul D, Zhang X, Molina AJA, Redman LM, Martin CK, Racette SB, et al.Calorie restriction reduces biomarkers of cellular senescence in humans. Aging Cell. 2023;23(2):Article e14038.
6.
Lucas V, Cavadas C, Aveleira CA, Hook V. Cellular senescence: From mechanisms to current biomarkers and senotherapies. Pharmacol Rev. 2023;75(4):675–713.
7.
Vaiserman A, De Falco E, Koliada A, Maslova O, Balistreri CR. Anti-ageing gene therapy: Not so far away? Ageing Res Rev. 2019;56:Article 100977.
8.
Wang T-W, Johmura Y, Suzuki N, Omori S, Migita T, Yamaguchi K, Hatakeyama S, Yamazaki S, Shimizu E, Imoto S, et al.Blocking PD-L1–PD-1 improves senescence surveillance and ageing phenotypes. Nature. 2022;611(7935):358–364.
9.
Di Micco R, Krizhanovsky V, Baker D, d’Adda di Fagagna F. Cellular senescence in ageing: From mechanisms to therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2021;22(2):75–95.
10.
Liu Z, Liang Q, Ren Y, Guo C, Ge X, Wang L, Cheng Q, Luo P, Zhang Y, Han X. Immunosenescence: Molecular mechanisms and diseases. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):200.
11.
Schwartz RE, Conboy . Non-intrinsic, systemic mechanisms of cellular senescence. Cells. 2023;12(24):2769.
12.
Gasek NS, Kuchel GA, Kirkland JL, Xu M. Strategies for targeting senescent cells in human disease. Nat Aging. 2021;1(10):870–879.
13.
Suda M, Shimizu I, Katsuumi G, Yoshida Y, Hayashi Y, Ikegami R, Matsumoto N, Yoshida Y, Mikawa R, Katayama A, et al.Senolytic vaccination improves normal and pathological age-related phenotypes and increases lifespan in progeroid mice. Nat Aging. 2021;1(12):1117–1126.
14.
Yoshida S, Nakagami H, Hayashi H, Ikeda Y, Sun J, Tenma A, Tomioka H, Kawano T, Shimamura M, Morishita R, et al.The CD153 vaccine is a senotherapeutic option for preventing the accumulation of senescent T cells in mice. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):Article 2482.
15.
Shrestha N, Chaturvedi P, Zhu X, Dee MJ, George V, Janney C, Egan JO, Liu B, Foster M, Marsala L, et al.Immunotherapeutic approach to reduce senescent cells and alleviate senescence-associated secretory phenotype in mice. Aging Cell. 2023;22(5):Article e13806.
16.
Kasu YAT, Signer RAJ. Anti-ageing antibodies revive the immune system. Nature. 2024;628(8006):43–45.
17.
Bai Z, Yang P, Yu F, Li Z, Yao Z, Martinez J, Li M, Xu H. Combining adoptive NK cell infusion with a dopamine-releasing peptide reduces senescent cells in aged mice. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13(4):Article 305.
18.
Amor C, Feucht J, Leibold J, Ho Y-J, Zhu C, Alonso-Curbelo D, Mansilla-Soto J, Boyer JA, Li X, Giavridis T, et al.Senolytic CAR T cells reverse senescence-associated pathologies. Nature. 2020;583(7814):127–132.
19.
Widjaja AA, Lim W-W, Viswanathan S, Chothani S, Corden B, Dasan CM, Goh JWT, Lim R, Singh BK, Tan J, et al.Inhibition of IL-11 signalling extends mammalian healthspan and lifespan. Nature. 2024;632(8023):157–165.
20.
Sato Y, Oguchi A, Fukushima Y, Masuda K, Toriu N, Taniguchi K, Yoshikawa T, Cui X, Kondo M, Hosoi T, et al.CD153/CD30 signaling promotes age-dependent tertiary lymphoid tissue expansion and kidney injury. J Clin Invest. 2022;132(2):Article e146071.
21.
Sallin MA, Kauffman KD, Riou C, Du Bruyn E, Foreman TW, Sakai S, Hoft SG, Myers TG, Gardina PJ, Sher A, et al.Host resistance to pulmonary Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection requires CD153 expression. Nat Microbiol. 2018;3(11):1198–1205.
22.
Saade M, Araujo de Souza G, Scavone C, Kinoshita PF. The role of GPNMB in inflammation. Front Immunol. 2021;12:674739.
23.
Suda M, Shimizu I, Katsuumi G, Hsiao CL, Yoshida Y, Matsumoto N, Yoshida Y, Katayama A, Wada J, Seki M, et al.Glycoprotein nonmetastatic melanoma protein B regulates lysosomal integrity and lifespan of senescent cells. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):Article 6522.
24.
Ai, L., Xu, A. & Xu, J. Roles of PD-1/PD-L1 pathway: Signaling, cancer, and beyond. In: Regulation of cancer immune checkpoints. Singapore: Springer; 2020. p 33–59.
25.
Onorati A, Havas AP, Lin B, Rajagopal J, Sen P, Adams PD, Dou Z. Upregulation of PD-L1 in senescence and aging. Mol Cell Biol. 2023;42(10):Article e0017122.
26.
Majewska J, Agrawal A, Mayo A, Roitman L, Chatterjee R, Sekeresova Kralova J, Landsberger T, Katzenelenbogen Y, Meir-Salame T, Hagai E, et al.p16-dependent increase of PD-L1 stability regulates immunosurveillance of senescent cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2024;26(8):1336–1345.
27.
Song P, An J, Zou M-H. Immune clearance of senescent cells to combat ageing and chronic diseases. Cells. 2020;9(3):671.
28.
Sagiv A, Burton DGA, Moshayev Z, Vadai E, Wensveen F, Ben-Dor S, Golani O, Polic B, Krizhanovsky V. NKG2D ligands mediate immunosurveillance of senescent cells. Aging. 2016;8(2):328–344.
29.
Chelyapov N, Nguyen TT, Gonzalez R. Autologous NK cells propagated and activated ex vivo decrease senescence markers in human PBMCs. Biochem Biophys Rep. 2022;32:Article 101380.
30.
Capellino S, Claus M, Watzl C. Regulation of natural killer cell activity by glucocorticoids, serotonin, dopamine, and epinephrine. Cell Mol Immunol. 2020;17(7):705–711.
31.
Matt SM, Gaskill PJ. Where is dopamine and how do immune cells see it?: Dopamine-mediated immune cell function in health and disease. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2019;15(1):114–164.
32.
Yang D, Sun B, Li S, Wei W, Liu X, Cui X, Zhang X, Liu N, Yan L, Deng Y, et al.NKG2D-CAR T cells eliminate senescent cells in aged mice and nonhuman primates. Sci Transl Med. 2023;15(709):Article eadd1951.
33.
Amor C, Fernández-Maestre I, Chowdhury S, Ho Y-J, Nadella S, Graham C, Carrasco SE, Nnuji-John E, Feucht J, Hinterleitner C, et al.Prophylactic and long-lasting efficacy of senolytic CAR T cells against age-related metabolic dysfunction. Nat Aging. 2024;4(3):336–349.
34.
Bai Z, Feng B, McClory SE, de Oliveira BC, Diorio C, Gregoire C, Tao B, Yang L, Zhao Z, Peng L, et al.Single-cell CAR T atlas reveals type 2 function in 8-year leukaemia remission. Nature. 2024;634(8034):702–711.
35.
Stewart CM, Siegler EL, Sakemura RL, Cox MJ, Huynh T, Kimball B, Mai L, Can I, Manriquez Roman C, Yun K, et al.IL-4 drives exhaustion of CD8+ CART cells. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):7921.
36.
Rossi DJ, Bryder D, Zahn JM, Ahlenius H, Sonu R, Wagers AJ, Weissman IL. Cell intrinsic alterations underlie hematopoietic stem cell aging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(26):9194–9199.
37.
Liao M, Chen R, Yang Y, He H, Xu L, Jiang Y, Guo Z, He W, Jiang H, Wang J. Aging-elevated inflammation promotes DNMT3A R878H-driven clonal hematopoiesis. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2022;12(2):678–691.
38.
Wang J, Ju Z, Wang X, Liu W, Chang Y, Ye M, Yang X, Tang B, Cong T, Dong Q, et al.Aging-induced IL27Ra signaling impairs hematopoietic stem cells. Blood. 2020;136(2):183–198.
39.
Ross JB, Myers LM, Noh JJ, Collins MM, Carmody AB, Messer RJ, Dhuey E, Hasenkrug KJ, Weissman IL. Depleting myeloid-biased haematopoietic stem cells rejuvenates aged immunity. Nature. 2024;628(8006):162–170.
40.
Roybal KT, Rupp LJ, Morsut L, Walker WJ, McNally KA, Park JS, Lim WA. Precision tumor recognition by T cells with combinatorial antigen-sensing circuits. Cell. 2016;164(4):770–779.
41.
Dugan B, Conway J, Duggal NA. Inflammaging as a target for healthy ageing. Age Ageing. 2023;52(2):Article afac328.
42.
Ren L-L, Miao H, Wang Y-N, Liu F, Li P, Zhao Y-Y. TGF-β as a master regulator of aging-associated tissue fibrosis. Aging Dis. 2023;14(5):1633–1650.
43.
Xu DH, Zhu Z, Wakefield MR, Xiao H, Bai Q, Fang Y. The role of IL-11 in immunity and cancer. Cancer Lett. 2016;373(2):156–163.
44.
Fung KY, Louis C, Metcalfe RD, Kosasih CC, Wicks IP, Griffin MDW, Putoczki TL. Emerging roles for IL-11 in inflammatory diseases. Cytokine. 2022;149:155750.
45.
Self WK, Holtzman DM. Emerging diagnostics and therapeutics for Alzheimer disease. Nat Med. 2023;29(9):2187–2199.
46.
Breijyeh Z, Karaman R. Comprehensive review on Alzheimer’s disease: Causes and treatment. Molecules. 2020;25(24):5789.
47.
Schenk D, Barbour R, Dunn W, Gordon G, Grajeda H, Guido T, Hu K, Huang J, Johnson-Wood K, Khan K, et al.Immunization with amyloid-β attenuates Alzheimer-disease-like pathology in the PDAPP mouse. Nature. 1999;400(6740):173–177.
48.
Hock C, Konietzko U, Streffer JR, Tracy J, Signorell A, Müller-Tillmanns B, Lemke U, Henke K, Moritz E, Garcia E, et al.Antibodies against β-amyloid slow cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron. 2003;38(4):547–554.
49.
Orgogozo JM, Gilman S, Dartigues JF, Laurent B, Puel M, Kirby LC, Jouanny P, Dubois B, Eisner L, Flitman S, et al.Subacute meningoencephalitis in a subset of patients with AD after Aβ42 immunization. Neurology. 2003;61(1):46–54.
50.
Wu R, Sun F, Zhang W, Ren J, Liu G-H. Targeting aging and age-related diseases with vaccines. Nat Aging. 2024;4(4):464–482.
51.
Davtyan H, Ghochikyan A, Petrushina I, Hovakimyan A, Davtyan A, Cribbs DH, Agadjanyan MG. The MultiTEP platform–based Alzheimer’s disease epitope vaccine activates a broad repertoire of T helper cells in nonhuman primates. Alzheimers Dement. 2014;10(3):271–283.
52.
Lacosta A-M, Pascual-Lucas M, Pesini P, Casabona D, Pérez-Grijalba V, Marcos-Campos I, Sarasa L, Canudas J, Badi H, Monleón I, et al.Safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of an active anti-Aβ40 vaccine (ABvac40) in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase I trial. Alzheimer’s Res Ther. 2018;10(1):12.
53.
Asuni AA, Boutajangout A, Quartermain D, Sigurdsson EM. Immunotherapy targeting pathological tau conformers in a tangle mouse model reduces brain pathology with associated functional improvements. J Neurosci. 2007;27(34):9115–9129.
54.
Song C, Shi J, Zhang P, Zhang Y, Xu J, Zhao L, Zhang R, Wang H, Chen H. Immunotherapy for Alzheimer’s disease: Targeting β-amyloid and beyond. Transl Neurodegener. 2022;11(1):18.
55.
Ait-Bouziad N, Chiki A, Limorenko G, Xiao S, Eliezer D, Lashuel HA. Phosphorylation of the overlooked tyrosine 310 regulates the structure, aggregation, and microtubule- and lipid-binding properties of tau. J Biol Chem. 2020;295(23):7905–7922.
56.
Sims JR, Zimmer JA, Evans CD, Lu M, Ardayfio P, Sparks J, Wessels AM, Shcherbinin S, Wang H, Monkul Nery ES, et al.Donanemab in early symptomatic Alzheimer disease. JAMA. 2023;330(6):512–527.
57.
Gordon ML, Christen E, Keehlisen L, Gong M, Lam F, Giliberto L, Gomar JJ, Koppel J. An open-label, pilot study of daratumumab SC in mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimer’s Dis Rep. 2024;8(1):1111–1114.
58.
Merighi S, Nigro M, Travagli A, Gessi S. Microglia and Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(21):12990.
59.
Wang S, Mustafa M, Yuede CM, Salazar SV, Kong P, Long H, Ward M, Siddiqui O, Paul R, Gilfillan S, et al.Anti-human TREM2 induces microglia proliferation and reduces pathology in an Alzheimer’s disease model. J Exp Med. 2020;217(9):Article e20200785.
60.
Tsering W, Prokop S. Neuritic plaques—Gateways to understanding Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurobiol. 2023;61(5):2808–2821.
61.
Leng F, Edison P. Neuroinflammation and microglial activation in Alzheimer disease: Where do we go from here? Nat Rev Neurol. 2020;17(3):157–172.
62.
Harms AS, Yang Y-T, Tansey MG. Central and peripheral innate and adaptive immunity in Parkinson’s disease. Sci Transl Med. 2023;15(721):Article eadk3225.
63.
Lang AE, Siderowf AD, Macklin EA, Poewe W, Brooks DJ, Fernandez HH, Rascol O, Giladi N, Stocchi F, Tanner CM, et al.Trial of cinpanemab in early Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(5):408–420.
64.
Pagano G, Taylor KI, Anzures-Cabrera J, Marchesi M, Simuni T, Marek K, Postuma RB, Pavese N, Stocchi F, Azulay J-P, et al.Trial of prasinezumab in early-stage Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(5):421–432.
65.
Eijsvogel P, Misra P, Concha-Marambio L, Boyd JD, Ding S, Fedor L, Hsieh Y-T, Sun YS, Vroom MM, Farris CM, et al.Target engagement and immunogenicity of an active immunotherapeutic targeting pathological α-synuclein: A phase 1 placebo-controlled trial. Nat Med. 2024;30(9):2631–2640.
66.
Pesch V, Flores-Fernandez JM, Reithofer S, Ma L, Özdüzenciler P, Busch Y, Sriraman A, Wang Y, Amidian S, Kroepel CVM, et al.Vaccination with structurally adapted fungal protein fibrils induces immunity to Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 2024;147(5):1644–1652.
67.
Ungvari Z, Tarantini S, Sorond F, Merkely B, Csiszar A. Mechanisms of vascular aging, a geroscience perspective. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75(8):931–941.
68.
Pan Y, Zhou Z, Zhang H, Zhou Y, Li Y, Li C, Chen X, Yang S, Liao Y, Qiu Z. The ATRQβ-001 vaccine improves cardiac function and prevents postinfarction cardiac remodeling in mice. Hypertens Res. 2018;42(3):329–340.
69.
Caputo I, Bertoldi G, Driussi G, Cacciapuoti M, Calò LA. The RAAS goodfellas in cardiovascular system. J Clin Med. 2023;12(21):6873.
70.
Li C, Yan X, Wu D, Zhang K, Liang X, Pan Y, Zhou Y, Chen F, Chen X, Yang S, et al.Vaccine targeted alpha 1D-adrenergic receptor for hypertension. Hypertension. 2019;74(6):1551–1562.
71.
Dai Y, Chen X, Song X, Chen X, Ma W, Lin J, Wu H, Hu X, Zhou Y, Zhang H, et al.Immunotherapy of endothelin-1 receptor type A for pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(20):2567–2580.
72.
Ferrario CM, VonCannon JL, Zhang J, Figueroa JP, Wright KN, Groban L, Saha A, Meredith JW, Ahmad S. Immunoneutralization of human angiotensin-(1-12) with a monoclonal antibody in a humanized model of hypertension. Peptides. 2022;149:170714.
73.
McMahon C, Staus DP, Wingler LM, Wang J, Skiba MA, Elgeti M, Hubbell WL, Rockman HA, Kruse AC, Lefkowitz RJ. Synthetic nanobodies as angiotensin receptor blockers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117(33):20284–20291.
74.
Dybiec J, Krzemińska J, Radzioch E, Szlagor M, Wronka M, Młynarska E, Rysz J, Franczyk B. Advances in the pathogenesis and treatment of resistant hypertension. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(16):12911.
75.
Nguyen BA, Alexander MR, Harrison DG. Immune mechanisms in the pathophysiology of hypertension. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2024;20(8):530–540.
76.
Tarnawski L, Shavva VS, Kort EJ, Zhuge Z, Nilsson I, Gallina AL, Martínez-Enguita D, Heller Sahlgren B, Weiland M, Caravaca AS, et al.Cholinergic regulation of vascular endothelial function by human ChAT+ T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2023;120(14):Article e2212476120.
77.
Márquez-Sánchez AC, Koltsova EK. Immune and inflammatory mechanisms of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Front Immunol. 2022;13:Article 989933.
78.
Wang X, Zhang H, Ge Y, Cao L, He Y, Sun G, Jia S, Ma A, Liu J, Rong D, et al.AT1R regulates macrophage polarization through YAP and regulates aortic dissection incidence. Front Physiol. 2021;12:Article 644903.
79.
Wang S, Gu X, Zhang Q, Zhang X, Li Y, Yao Y, Yu B, Zhang Y. Angiotensin II suppresses Rev-erbα expression in THP-1 macrophages via the Ang II type 1 receptor/liver X receptor α pathway. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;46(1):303–313.
80.
Durik M, Sevá Pessôa B, Roks AJM. The renin–angiotensin system, bone marrow and progenitor cells. Clin Sci. 2012;123(4):205–223.
81.
Gao J, Cao H, Hu G, Wu Y, Xu Y, Cui H, Lu HS, Zheng L. The mechanism and therapy of aortic aneurysms. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):55.
82.
Saxton RA, Glassman CR, Garcia KC. Emerging principles of cytokine pharmacology and therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2022;22(1):21–37.
83.
Kurashiki T, Miyake T, Nakagami H, Nishimura M, Morishita R. Prevention of progression of aortic aneurysm by peptide vaccine against Ang II (angiotensin II) in a rat model. Hypertension. 2020;76(6):1879–1888.
84.
Zhang H, Liao M, Cao M, Qiu Z, Yan X, Zhou Y, Wu H, Wang Y, Zheng J, Ding J, et al.ATRQβ-001 vaccine prevents experimental abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(18):Article e012341.
85.
Libby P. The changing landscape of atherosclerosis. Nature. 2021;592(7855):524–533.
86.
Liuzzo G, Biasucci LM, Gallimore JR, Grillo RL, Rebuzzi AG, Pepys MB, Maseri A. The prognostic value of C-reactive protein and serum amyloid a protein in severe unstable angina. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(7):417–424.
87.
Engelen SE, Robinson AJB, Zurke Y-X, Monaco C. Therapeutic strategies targeting inflammation and immunity in atherosclerosis: How to proceed? Nat Rev Cardiol. 2022;19(8):522–542.
88.
Yan Y, Thakur M, van der Vorst EPC, Weber C, Döring Y. Targeting the chemokine network in atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 2021;330:95–106.
89.
Hwang HJ, Kim N, Herman AB, Gorospe M, Lee J-S. Factors and pathways modulating endothelial cell senescence in vascular aging. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(17):Article 10135.
90.
Bu L-L, Yuan H-H, Xie L-L, Guo M-H, Liao D-F, Zheng X-L. New dawn for atherosclerosis: Vascular endothelial cell senescence and death. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(20):Article 15160.
91.
Vellasamy DM, Lee S-J, Goh KW, Goh B-H, Tang Y-Q, Ming LC, Yap WH. Targeting immune senescence in atherosclerosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(21):13059.
92.
Freigang S, Hörkkö S, Miller E, Witztum JL, Palinski W. Immunization of LDL receptor–deficient mice with homologous malondialdehyde-modified and native LDL reduces progression of atherosclerosis by mechanisms other than induction of high titers of antibodies to oxidative neoepitopes. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998;18(12):1972–1982.
93.
Abduljabbar MH. PCSK9 inhibitors: Focus on evolocumab and its impact on atherosclerosis progression. Pharmaceuticals. 2024;17(12):1581.
94.
Ji E, Lee S. Antibody-based therapeutics for atherosclerosis and cardiovascular diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(11):5770.
95.
Ridker PM, Everett BM, Thuren T, MacFadyen JG, Chang WH, Ballantyne C, Fonseca F, Nicolau J, Koenig W, Anker SD, et al.Antiinflammatory therapy with canakinumab for atherosclerotic disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(12):1119–1131.
96.
Abbate A, Trankle CR, Buckley LF, Lipinski MJ, Appleton D, Kadariya D, Canada JM, Carbone S, Roberts CS, Abouzaki N, et al.Interleukin-1 blockade inhibits the acute inflammatory response in patients with ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(5):Article e014941.
97.
Broch K, Anstensrud AK, Woxholt S, Sharma K, Tøllefsen IM, Bendz B, Aakhus S, Ueland T, Amundsen BH, Damås JK, et al.Randomized trial of interleukin-6 receptor inhibition in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77(15):1845–1855.
98.
Ridker PM, Devalaraja M, Baeres FMM, Engelmann MDM, Hovingh GK, Ivkovic M, Lo L, Kling D, Pergola P, Raj D, et al.IL-6 inhibition with ziltivekimab in patients at high atherosclerotic risk (RESCUE): A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2021;397(10289):2060–2069.
99.
Chen L, Zhou Z, Hu C, Maitz MF, Yang L, Luo R, Wang Y. Platelet membrane-coated nanocarriers targeting plaques to deliver anti-CD47 antibody for atherosclerotic therapy. Research. 2022;2022:9845459.
100.
Chatterjee S, Khunti K, Davies MJ. Type 2 diabetes. Lancet. 2017;389(10085):2239–2251.
101.
Nasykhova YA, Tonyan ZN, Mikhailova AA, Danilova MM, Glotov AS. Pharmacogenetics of type 2 diabetes—Progress and prospects. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(18):Article 6842.
102.
Deacon CF. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2020;16(11):642–653.
103.
Kim KM, Noh JH, Bodogai M, Martindale JL, Yang X, Indig FE, Basu SK, Ohnuma K, Morimoto C, Johnson PF, et al.Identification of senescent cell surface targetable protein DPP4. Genes Dev. 2017;31(15):1529–1534.
104.
Pang Z, Nakagami H, Osako MK, Koriyama H, Nakagami F, Tomioka H, Shimamura M, Kurinami H, Takami Y, Morishita R, et al.Therapeutic vaccine against DPP4 improves glucose metabolism in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111(13):E1256–E1263.
105.
Begum M, Choubey M, Tirumalasetty MB, Arbee S, Mohib MM, Wahiduzzaman M, Mamun MA, Uddin MB, Mohiuddin MS. Adiponectin: A promising target for the treatment of diabetes and its complications. Life. 2023;13(11):2213.
106.
Hui X, Gu P, Zhang J, Nie T, Pan Y, Wu D, Feng T, Zhong C, Wang Y, Lam KSL, et al.Adiponectin enhances cold-induced browning of subcutaneous adipose tissue via promoting M2 macrophage proliferation. Cell Metab. 2015;22(2):279–290.
107.
Asahara N, Okada-Iwabu M, Iwabu M, Wada K, Oka K, Yamauchi T, Kadowaki T. A monoclonal antibody activating AdipoR for type 2 diabetes and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Sci Adv. 2023;9(45):Article eadg4216.
108.
Riera CE. Can monoclonal antibodies against CGRP offer new treatment options for type 2 diabetes? J Diabetes Clin Res. 2020;2(4):114–118.
109.
Lewin AS, Yokota H, Hayashi H, Hanaguri J, Yamagami S, Kushiyama A, Nakagami H, Nagaoka T. Effect of prorenin peptide vaccine on the early phase of diabetic retinopathy in a murine model of type 2 diabetes. PLOS ONE. 2022;17(1):Article e0262568.
110.
Jurgens CA, Toukatly MN, Fligner CL, Udayasankar J, Subramanian SL, Zraika S, Aston-Mourney K, Carr DB, Westermark P, Westermark GT, et al.β-Cell loss and β-cell apoptosis in human type 2 diabetes are related to islet amyloid deposition. Am J Pathol. 2011;178(6):2632–2640.
111.
Blencowe M, Furterer A, Wang Q, Gao F, Rosenberger M, Pei L, Nomoto H, Mawla AM, Huising MO, Coppola G, et al.IAPP-induced beta cell stress recapitulates the islet transcriptome in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2021;65(1):173–187.
112.
Roesti ES, Boyle CN, Zeman DT, Sande-Melon M, Storni F, Cabral-Miranda G, Knuth A, Lutz TA, Vogel M, Bachmann MF. Vaccination against amyloidogenic aggregates in pancreatic islets prevents development of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Vaccine. 2020;8(1):Article 116.
113.
Vogt A-CS, Roesti ES, Mohsen MO, Leonchiks A, Vogel M, Bachmann MF. Anti-IAPP monoclonal antibody improves clinical symptoms in a mouse model of type 2 diabetes. Vaccine. 2021;9(11):1316.
114.
Bortoletto AS, Graham WV, Trout G, Bonito-Oliva A, Kazmi MA, Gong J, Weyburne E, Houser BL, Sakmar TP, Parchem RJ. Human islet amyloid polypeptide (hIAPP) protofibril-specific antibodies for detection and treatment of type 2 diabetes. Adv Sci. 2022;9(34):Article e2202342.
115.
Sharma BR, Kanneganti T-D. NLRP3 inflammasome in cancer and metabolic diseases. Nat Immunol. 2021;22(5):550–559.
116.
Lanka N, Acharya P, Virani S, Afreen S, Perthiani A, Sangster E, Arcia Franchini AP. Safety and efficacy of canakinumab for the prevention and control of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications: A systematic review. Cureus. 2024;16(8):Article e67065.
117.
Cavelti-Weder C, Timper K, Seelig E, Keller C, Osranek M, Lässing U, Spohn G, Maurer P, Müller P, Jennings GT, et al.Development of an interleukin-1β vaccine in patients with type 2 diabetes. Mol Ther. 2016;24(5):1003–1012.
118.
Dhimolea E. Canakinumab. MAbs. 2014;2(1):3–13.
119.
Black RJ, Cross M, Haile LM, Culbreth GT, Steinmetz JD, Hagins H, Kopec JA, Brooks PM, Woolf AD, Ong KL, et al.Global, regional, and national burden of rheumatoid arthritis, 1990–2020, and projections to 2050: A systematic analysis of the global burden of disease study 2021. Lancet Rheumatol. 2023;5(10):e594–e610.
120.
Di Matteo A, Bathon JM, Emery P. Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet. 2023;402(10416):2019–2033.
121.
Sepriano A, Kerschbaumer A, Bergstra SA, Smolen JS, van der Heijde D, Caporali R, Edwards CJ, Verschueren P, de Souza S, Pope J, et al.Safety of synthetic and biological DMARDs: A systematic literature review informing the 2022 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023;82(1):107–118.
122.
Cope AP, Jasenecova M, Vasconcelos JC, Filer A, Raza K, Qureshi S, D’Agostino MA, McInnes IB, Isaacs JD, Pratt AG, et al.Abatacept in individuals at high risk of rheumatoid arthritis (APIPPRA): A randomised, double-blind, multicentre, parallel, placebo-controlled, phase 2b clinical trial. Lancet. 2024;403(10429):838–849.
123.
Romero-Castillo L, Pandey RK, Xu B, Beusch CM, Oliveira-Coelho A, Zeqiraj K, Svensson C, Xu Z, Luo H, Sareila O, et al.A novel tolerogenic antigen-specific vaccine induces VISTA-enriched regulatory T cells and protects against arthritis in DRB1*04:01 mice. Mol Ther. 2025;33(8):3528–3545.
124.
Jin X, Dong T, Wang Q, Xie Y, Fang X, Wei C, Liu S, Zheng X, Wang P, Zhu D, et al.A citrullinated antigenic vaccine in treatment of autoimmune arthritis. Sci Bull. 2024;69(18):2920–2929.
125.
Benham H, Nel HJ, Law SC, Mehdi AM, Street S, Ramnoruth N, Pahau H, Lee BT, Ng J, Brunck ME, et al.Citrullinated peptide dendritic cell immunotherapy in HLA risk genotype–positive rheumatoid arthritis patients. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7(290):Article 290ra87.
126.
Zavvar M, Assadiasl S, Zargaran S, Akhtari M, Poopak B, Dinarvand R, Fatahi Y, Tayebi L, Soleimanifar N, Nicknam MH. Adoptive Treg cell-based immunotherapy: Frontier therapeutic aspects in rheumatoid arthritis. Immunotherapy. 2020;12(12):933–946.
127.
Zhang B, Wang Y, Yuan Y, Sun J, Liu L, Huang D, Hu J, Wang M, Li S, Song W, et al.In vitro elimination of autoreactive B cells from rheumatoid arthritis patients by universal chimeric antigen receptor T cells. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80(2):176–184.
128.
Sarsenova M, Issabekova A, Abisheva S, Rutskaya-Moroshan K, Ogay V, Saparov A. Mesenchymal stem cell-based therapy for rheumatoid arthritis. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(21):Article 11592.
129.
Zhang C, Ma P, Qin A, Wang L, Dai K, Liu Y, Zhao J, Lu Z. Current immunotherapy strategies for rheumatoid arthritis: The immunoengineering and delivery systems. Research. 2023;6:Article 0220.
130.
Yao Q, Wu X, Tao C, Gong W, Chen M, Qu M, Zhong Y, He T, Chen S, Xiao G. Osteoarthritis: Pathogenic signaling pathways and therapeutic targets. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):56.
131.
Liu Y, Zhang Z, Li T, Xu H, Zhang H. Senescence in osteoarthritis: From mechanism to potential treatment. Arthritis Res Ther. 2022;24(1):174.
132.
Molnar V, Matisic V, Kodvanj I, Bjelica R, Jelec Z, Hudetz D, Rod E, Cukelj F, Vrdoljak T, Vidovic D, et al.Cytokines and chemokines involved in osteoarthritis pathogenesis. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(17):Article 9208.
133.
Xu Y, Wang J-Y, Zou Y, Ma X-W, Meng T. Role of IL-1 family cytokines IL-36, IL-37, IL-38 in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: A comprehensive review. J Inflamm Res. 2024;17:4001–4016.
134.
Katz JN, Arant KR, Loeser RF. Diagnosis and treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis: A review. JAMA. 2021;325(6):568–578.
135.
Magni A, Agostoni P, Bonezzi C, Massazza G, Mene P, Savarino V, Fornasari D. Management of osteoarthritis: Expert opinion on NSAIDs. Pain Ther. 2021;10(2):783–808.
136.
Jiang W, Xu J. Immune modulation by mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Prolif. 2019;53(1):Article e12712.
137.
Zhao X, Zhao Y, Sun X, Xing Y, Wang X, Yang Q. Immunomodulation of MSCs and MSC-derived extracellular vesicles in osteoarthritis. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:Article 575057.
138.
Matas J, Orrego M, Amenabar D, Infante C, Tapia-Limonchi R, Cadiz MI, Alcayaga-Miranda F, González PL, Muse E, Khoury M, et al.Umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) for knee osteoarthritis: Repeated MSC dosing is superior to a single MSC dose and to hyaluronic acid in a controlled randomized phase I/II trial. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2019;8(3):215–224.
139.
Al-Najar M, Khalil H, Al-Ajlouni J, Al-Antary E, Hamdan M, Rahmeh R, Alhattab D, Samara O, Yasin M, Abdullah AA, et al.Intra-articular injection of expanded autologous bone marrow mesenchymal cells in moderate and severe knee osteoarthritis is safe: A phase I/II study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2017;12(1):Article 190.
140.
Bolander J, Moviglia Brandolina MT, Poehling G, Jochl O, Parsons E, Vaughan W, Moviglia G, Atala A. The synovial environment steers cartilage deterioration and regeneration. Sci Adv. 2023;9(16):Article eade4645.
141.
Huo S, Tang X, Chen W, Gan D, Guo H, Yao Q, Liao R, Huang T, Wu J, Yang J, et al.Epigenetic regulations of cellular senescence in osteoporosis. Ageing Res Rev. 2024;99.
142.
Zhang Y-Y, Xie N, Sun X-D, Nice EC, Liou Y-C, Huang C, Zhu H, Shen Z. Insights and implications of sexual dimorphism in osteoporosis. Bone Res. 2024;12(1):Article 102235.
143.
El-Masri BM, Andreasen CM, Laursen KS, Kofod VB, Dahl XG, Nielsen MH, Thomsen JS, Brüel A, Sørensen MS, Hansen LJ, et al.Mapping RANKL- and OPG-expressing cells in bone tissue: The bone surface cells as activators of osteoclastogenesis and promoters of the denosumab rebound effect. Bone Res. 2024;12(1):Article 62.
144.
Reid IR, Billington EO. Drug therapy for osteoporosis in older adults. Lancet. 2022;399(10329):1080–1092.
145.
Elbers LPB, Raterman HG, Lems WF. Bone mineral density loss and fracture risk after discontinuation of anti-osteoporotic drug treatment: A narrative review. Drugs. 2021;81(14):1645–1655.
146.
Marino S, Akel N, Li S, Cregor M, Jones M, Perez B, Troncoso G, Meeks J, Stewart S, Sato AY, et al.Reversal of the diabetic bone signature with anabolic therapies in mice. Bone Res. 2023;11(1):32.
147.
Bovijn J, Krebs K, Chen C-Y, Boxall R, Censin JC, Ferreira T, Pulit SL, Glastonbury CA, Laber S, Millwood IY, et al.Evaluating the cardiovascular safety of sclerostin inhibition using evidence from meta-analysis of clinical trials and human genetics. Sci Transl Med. 2020;12(549):Article eaay6570.
148.
Rivas M, Gupta G, Costanzo L, Ahmed H, Wyman AE, Geraghty P. Senescence: Pathogenic driver in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Medicina. 2022;58(6):Article 817.
149.
Easter M, Bollenbecker S, Barnes JW, Krick S. Targeting aging pathways in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(18):6924.
150.
Forman HJ, Zhang H. Targeting oxidative stress in disease: Promise and limitations of antioxidant therapy. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2021;20(9):689–709.
151.
Ismaila AS, Haeussler K, Czira A, Youn J-H, Malmenäs M, Risebrough NA, Agarwal J, Nassim M, Sharma R, Compton C, et al.Fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) triple therapy compared with other therapies for the treatment of COPD: A network meta-analysis. Adv Ther. 2022;39(9):3957–3978.
152.
Ito K, Colley & Mercado.Geroprotectors as a novel therapeutic strategy for COPD, an accelerating aging disease. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2012;7:641–652.
153.
Anisimov VN, Berstein LM, Popovich IG, Zabezhinski MA, Egormin PA, Piskunova TS, Semenchenko AV, Tyndyk ML, Yurova MN, Kovalenko IG, et al.If started early in life, metformin treatment increases life span and postpones tumors in female SHR mice. Aging. 2011;3(2):148–157.
154.
Bhatt SP, Rabe KF, Hanania NA, Vogelmeier CF, Bafadhel M, Christenson SA, Papi A, Singh D, Laws E, Dakin P, et al.Effect of dupilumab on health-related quality of life and respiratory symptoms in patients with COPD and type 2 inflammation. Chest. 2025;168(1):56–66.
155.
Bhatt SP, Rabe KF, Hanania NA, Vogelmeier CF, Bafadhel M, Christenson SA, Papi A, Singh D, Laws E, Dakin P, et al.Dupilumab for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with type 2 inflammation: A pooled analysis of two phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Lancet Respir Med. 2025;13(3):234–243.
156.
Singh D, Brightling CE, Rabe KF, Han MK, Christenson SA, Drummond MB, Papi A, Pavord ID, Molfino NA, Almqvist G, et al.Efficacy and safety of tezepelumab versus placebo in adults with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COURSE): A randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2a trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2025;13(1):47–58.
157.
Zhao Y, Du J, Xu Z, Wang L, Ma L, Sun L. DNA adjuvant hydrogel-optimized enzymatic cascade reaction for tumor chemodynamic-immunotherapy. Adv Sci. 2024;11(10):Article e2308229.
158.
Sciurba FC, Criner GJ, Christenson SA, Martinez FJ, Papi A, Roche N, Bourbeau J, Korn S, Bafadhel M, Han MK, et al.Mepolizumab to prevent exacerbations of COPD with an eosinophilic phenotype. N Engl J Med. 2025;392(17):1710–1720.
159.
Guo B, Shi X, Jiang Q, Pan Y, Yang Y, Liu Y, Chen S, Zhu W, Ren L, Liang R, et al.Targeting immunoproteasome in polarized macrophages ameliorates experimental emphysema via activating NRF1/2-P62 axis and suppressing IRF4 transcription. Adv Sci. 2024;11(44):Article e2405318.
160.
Henderson NC, Rieder F, Wynn TA. Fibrosis: From mechanisms to medicines. Nature. 2020;587(7835):555–566.
161.
O’Reilly S, Tsou P-S, Varga J. Senescence and tissue fibrosis: Opportunities for therapeutic targeting. Trends Mol Med. 2024;30(12):1113–1125.
162.
Budi EH, Schaub JR, Decaris M, Turner S, Derynck R. TGF-β as a driver of fibrosis: Physiological roles and therapeutic opportunities. J Pathol. 2021;254(4):358–373.
163.
Aghajanian H, Kimura T, Rurik JG, Hancock AS, Leibowitz MS, Li L, Scholler J, Monslow J, Lo A, Han W, et al.Targeting cardiac fibrosis with engineered T cells. Nature. 2019;573(7774):430–433.
164.
Rurik JG, Tombácz I, Yadegari A, Méndez Fernández PO, Shewale SV, Li L, Kimura T, Soliman OY, Papp TE, Tam YK, et al.CAR T cells produced in vivo to treat cardiac injury. Science. 2022;375(6576):91–96.
165.
Sobecki M, Chen J, Krzywinska E, Nagarajan S, Fan Z, Nelius E, Monné Rodriguez JM, Seehusen F, Hussein A, Moschini G, et al.Vaccination-based immunotherapy to target profibrotic cells in liver and lung. Cell Stem Cell. 2022;29(10):1459–1474.e1459.
166.
Zeng Q, Mousa M, Nadukkandy AS, Franssens L, Alnaqbi H, Alshamsi FY, Safar HA, Carmeliet P. Understanding tumour endothelial cell heterogeneity and function from single-cell omics. Nat Rev Cancer. 2023;23(8):544–564.
167.
Csekes E, Račková L. Skin aging, cellular senescence and natural polyphenols. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(23):Article 12641.
168.
He X, Gao X, Xie W. Research progress in skin aging and immunity. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(7):4101.
169.
Franco AC, Aveleira C, Cavadas C. Skin senescence: Mechanisms and impact on whole-body aging. Trends Mol Med. 2022;28(2):97–109.
170.
Solá P, Mereu E, Bonjoch J, Casado-Peláez M, Prats N, Aguilera M, Reina O, Blanco E, Esteller M, Di Croce L, et al.Targeting lymphoid-derived IL-17 signaling to delay skin aging. Nat Aging. 2023;3(6):688–704.
171.
Hasegawa T, Oka T, Son HG, Oliver-García VS, Azin M, Eisenhaure TM, Lieb DJ, Hacohen N, Demehri S. Cytotoxic CD4+ T cells eliminate senescent cells by targeting cytomegalovirus antigen. Cell. 2023;186(7):1417–1431.e1420.
172.
de Magalhães JP. How ageing processes influence cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13(5):357–365.
173.
Zhu X, Huang X, Hu M, Sun R, Li J, Wang H, Pan X, Ma Y, Ning L, Tong T, et al.A specific enterotype derived from gut microbiome of older individuals enables favorable responses to immune checkpoint blockade therapy. Cell Host Microbe. 2024;32(4):489–505.e485.
174.
Zhivaki D, Kennedy SN, Park J, Boriello F, Devant P, Cao A, Bahleda KM, Murphy S, McCabe C, Evavold CL, et al.Correction of age-associated defects in dendritic cells enables CD4+ T cells to eradicate tumors. Cell. 2024;187(15):3888–3903.e3818.
175.
Kleeman SO, Thakir TM, Demestichas B, Mourikis N, Loiero D, Ferrer M, Bankier S, Riazat-Kesh YJRA, Lee H, Chantzichristos D, et al.Cystatin C is glucocorticoid responsive, directs recruitment of Trem2+ macrophages, and predicts failure of cancer immunotherapy. Cell Genom. 2023;3(8):Article 100347.
176.
Park MD, Le Berichel J, Hamon P, Wilk CM, Belabed M, Yatim N, Saffon A, Boumelha J, Falcomatà C, Tepper A, et al.Hematopoietic aging promotes cancer by fueling IL-1α–driven emergency myelopoiesis. Science. 2024;386(6720).
177.
Li K, Shi H, Zhang B, Ou X, Ma Q, Chen Y, Shu P, Li D, Wang Y. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells as immunosuppressive regulators and therapeutic targets in cancer. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6(1):Article eadn0327.
178.
Lasser SA, Ozbay Kurt FG, Arkhypov I, Utikal J, Umansky V. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in cancer and cancer therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2024;21(2):147–164.
179.
Chen ACY, Jaiswal S, Martinez D, Yerinde C, Ji K, Miranda V, Fung ME, Weiss SA, Zschummel M, Taguchi K, et al.The aged tumor microenvironment limits T cell control of cancer. Nat Immunol. 2024;25(6):1033–1045.
180.
Qi X, Jiang L, Cao J. Senotherapies: A novel strategy for synergistic anti-tumor therapy. Drug Discov Today. 2022;27(11):Article 103365.
181.
Magkouta S, Veroutis D, Papaspyropoulos A, Georgiou M, Lougiakis N, Pippa N, Havaki S, Palaiologou A, Thanos D-F, Kambas K, et al.Generation of a selective senolytic platform using a micelle-encapsulated Sudan Black B conjugated analog. Nat Aging. 2024;5(1):162–175.
182.
Zhao L, Liu P, Mao M, Zhang S, Bigenwald C, Dutertre C-A, Lehmann CHK, Pan H, Paulhan N, Amon L, et al.BCL2 inhibition reveals a dendritic cell–specific immune checkpoint that controls tumor immunosurveillance. Cancer Discov. 2023;13(11):2448–2469.
183.
Rodrik-Outmezguine VS, Okaniwa M, Yao Z, Novotny CJ, McWhirter C, Banaji A, Won H, Wong W, Berger M, de Stanchina E, et al.Overcoming mTOR resistance mutations with a new-generation mTOR inhibitor. Nature. 2016;534(7606):272–276.
184.
Hailemichael Y, Johnson DH, Abdel-Wahab N, Foo WC, Bentebibel S-E, Daher M, Haymaker C, Wani K, Saberian C, Ogata D, et al.Interleukin-6 blockade abrogates immunotherapy toxicity and promotes tumor immunity. Cancer Cell. 2022;40(5):509–523.e506.
185.
Prasanna PG, Citrin DE, Hildesheim J, Ahmed MM, Venkatachalam S, Riscuta G, Xi D, Zheng G, et al., Therapy-induced senescence: Opportunities to improve anticancer therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021;113(10):1285–1298.
186.
Mac Eochagain C, Power R, Sam C, Gonzalez-Senac NM, Walsh D, Roy M, Battisti NML. Inclusion, characteristics, and reporting of older adults in FDA registration studies of immunotherapy, 2018–2022. J Immunother Cancer. 2024;12(8):Article e009258.
187.
Wu T, Wang G, Wang X, Wang S, Zhao X, Wu C, Ning W, Tao Z, Chen F, Liu X-S. Quantification of neoantigen-mediated immunoediting in cancer evolution. Cancer Res. 2022;82(12):2226–2238.
188.
Tyshkovskiy A, Ma S, Shindyapina AV, Tikhonov S, Lee S-G, Bozaykut P, Castro JP, Seluanov A, Schork NJ, Gorbunova V, et al.Distinct longevity mechanisms across and within species and their association with aging. Cell. 2023;186(13):2929–2949.e2920.
189.
Graham AC, Bellou E, Harwood JC, Yaman U, Celikag M, Magusali N, Rambarack N, Botia JA, Sala Frigerio C, Hardy J, et al.Human longevity and Alzheimer’s disease variants act via microglia and oligodendrocyte gene networks. Brain. 2025;148(3):969–984.
190.
Cattaneo M, Beltrami AP, Thomas AC, Spinetti G, Alvino VV, Avolio E, Veneziano C, Rolle IG, Sponga S, Sangalli E, et al.The longevity-associated BPIFB4 gene supports cardiac function and vascularization in ageing cardiomyopathy. Cardiovasc Res. 2023;119(7):1583–1595.
191.
Jeong J-H, Han J-S, Jung Y, Lee S-M, Park S-H, Park M, Shin M-G, Kim N, Kang MS, Kim S, et al.A new AMPK isoform mediates glucose-restriction induced longevity non-cell autonomously by promoting membrane fluidity. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):288.
192.
Mavromatis LA, Rosoff DB, Bell AS, Jung J, Wagner J, Lohoff FW. Multi-omic underpinnings of epigenetic aging and human longevity. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):2236.
193.
Emerson FJ, Chiu C, Lin LY, Riedel CG, Zhu M, Lee SS. The chromatin factors SET-26 and HCF-1 oppose the histone deacetylase HDA-1 in longevity and gene regulation in C. elegans. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):Article 2320.
194.
Novelle MG, Naranjo-Martínez B, López-Cánovas JL, Díaz-Ruiz A. Fecal microbiota transplantation, a tool to transfer healthy longevity. Ageing Res Rev. 2025;103:102585.
195.
Ma S, Ji Z, Zhang B, Geng L, Cai Y, Nie C, Li J, Zuo Y, Sun Y, Xu G, et al.Spatial transcriptomic landscape unveils immunoglobin-associated senescence as a hallmark of aging. Cell. 2024;187(24):P7025–P7044.
196.
Lu YR, Tian X, Sinclair DA. The information theory of aging. Nat Aging. 2023;3(12):1486–1499.
197.
Ogrodnik M, Carlos Acosta J, Adams PD, d’Adda di Fagagna F, Baker DJ, Bishop CL, Chandra T, Collado M, Gil J, Gorgoulis V, et al.Guidelines for minimal information on cellular senescence experimentation in vivo. Cell. 2024;187(16):4150–4175.
198.
Reardon S. Five protein-design questions that still challenge AI. Nature. 2024;635(8037):246–248.
199.
Mauvais-Jarvis F, Bairey Merz N, Barnes PJ, Brinton RD, Carrero J-J, DeMeo DL, De Vries GJ, Epperson CN, Govindan R, Klein SL, et al.Sex and gender: Modifiers of health, disease, and medicine. Lancet. 2020;396(10250):565–582.
Year 2025 volume 8 Issue 9
PDF
10
6
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.34133/research.0866
  • Receive Date:2025-06-05
  • Online Date:2026-11-01
  • Published:2025-09-20
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-06-05
  • Revised:2025-08-06
  • Accepted:2025-08-06
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China(82473363)
National Natural Science Foundation of China(82272851)
Young Scientists Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China(22307043)
the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(2662024JC005)
the China postdoctoral Science Foundation(2023M731223)
the China postdoctoral Science Foundation(2023T160253)
Affiliations
    1NHC Key Laboratory of Tropical Disease Control, School of Life Sciences and Medical Technology, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan 571199, China.
    2College of Biomedicine and Health and College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China.
    3Institution of Pediatric Hematology & Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430030, China.
    4Department of Biomedical Engineering, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA.

Corresponding:

* Address correspondence to: (H.J.);
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/research/EN/10.34133/research.0866
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT