收藏切换
Lignin Unlocks Stealth Carbon Sinks in Cold Seeps via Microbial Enzymatic Gatekeeping
收藏切换
PDF
Jialing Li1, Jingchun Feng1, 2, *, Pandeng Wang3, Mengzhuo Zhu2, Yongji Huang4, Ying Wu5, Junning Fan5, Junlin Hu1, Xiyang Dong6, Yingli Zhou1, Xuanyu Tao1, Si Zhang1, *
Research. Vol 8 Article ID 0848
Less
收藏切换
Research. Vol 8 Article ID 0848
• Research Article •
Lignin Unlocks Stealth Carbon Sinks in Cold Seeps via Microbial Enzymatic Gatekeeping
Full
Jialing Li1, Jingchun Feng1, 2, *, Pandeng Wang3, Mengzhuo Zhu2, Yongji Huang4, Ying Wu5, Junning Fan5, Junlin Hu1, Xiyang Dong6, Yingli Zhou1, Xuanyu Tao1, Si Zhang1, *
Affiliations
  • 1Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou), Guangzhou 511458, China.
  • 2School of Ecology, Environmental, and Resources, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.
  • 3School of Pharmacy, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518055, China.
  • 4South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510301, China.
  • 5State Key Laboratory of Estuarine and Coastal Research East China Normal University, Shanghai 200662, China.
  • 6Key Laboratory of Marine Genetic Resources, Third Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Xiamen 361005, China.
About Author:

† These authors contributed equally to this work.

Published: 2025-08-20 doi: 10.34133/research.0848
Outline
收藏切换

Cold seep ecosystems serve as critical hubs in marine carbon cycling through methane emissions and organic matter processing. While terrestrial lignin constitutes a major fraction of persistent organic carbon in cold seep sediments, its microbial transformation pathways in deep-sea cold seep environments remain unexplored. Here, we present the first comprehensive analysis of lignin distribution across sediment horizons at the Haima cold seep, coupled with a multi-omics investigation of microbial lignin metabolism. Laboratory enrichment of sediment communities employing lignin as the exclusive carbon substrate revealed substantial microbial community restructuring dominated by Burkholderiales, Pseudomonadales, and Rhizobiales lineages. Integrated omics resolved 2-tiered metabolic cascades: (a) enzymatic depolymerization via dyP-type peroxidases and LigEFG-mediated β-aryl ether cleavage, targeting syringyl and diarylpropane subunits; (b) funneling of aromatic intermediates through 4,5-/3,4-PDOG (protocatechuate dioxygenase) pathways into central carbon metabolism. Although direct methanogenesis was undetected, methylotrophic potential was evidenced through methane cycle gene expression patterns by lignin decomposers. Phylogenetic surveys further demonstrated the global prevalence of lignin decomposers across 12 major cold seep systems. These decomposers showed marked divergence in enzymatic repertoires compared to degraders from other ecosystems. Our findings establish 3 paradigm shifts: (a) The turnover rates of terrestrial organic carbon are likely underestimated in deep-sea ecosystems; (b) microbial consortia employ combinatorial enzymatic strategies distinct from terrestrial decomposition regimes; (c) methyl shunting from lignin breakdown primes methanogenic precursors, revealing cryptic linkages between refractory carbon cycling and greenhouse gas reservoirs.

Jialing Li, Jingchun Feng, Pandeng Wang, Mengzhuo Zhu, Yongji Huang, Ying Wu, Junning Fan, Junlin Hu, Xiyang Dong, Yingli Zhou, Xuanyu Tao, Si Zhang. Lignin Unlocks Stealth Carbon Sinks in Cold Seeps via Microbial Enzymatic Gatekeeping[J]. Research, 2025 , 8 (8) : 0848 - . DOI: 10.34133/research.0848
Deep-sea cold seeps function as biogeochemical reactors, orchestrating the mineralization and sequestration of organic carbon through tightly coupled microbial processes that shape regional carbon budgets [1–3]. While CH4 and CO2 represent the terminal phase of carbon mineralization [4,5], the upstream enzymatic machinery governing macromolecular organic carbon breakdown—particularly the catabolism of aromatic polymers—remains a critical blind spot in current carbon flux models [6].
Vertical stratification analyses reveal substantial heterogeneity in organic carbon composition across sediment horizons [7–9], reflecting microbial niche partitioning and substrate specialization. The catabolism of organic carbon through microbial activity constitutes an intricate biochemical network, wherein polymeric macromolecules first undergo enzymatic depolymerization to yield monomeric building blocks, which are then channeled into acidogenesis pathways producing characteristic metabolites including hydrogen gas, short-chain fatty acids (e.g., acetate, propionate, and butyrate), and alcohol derivatives. These intermediates are ultimately metabolized into CH4 and CO2 [10]. Current paradigms disproportionately emphasize terminal methane cycling, neglecting the rate-limiting initial steps of high-molecular-weight organic carbon processing [11]. This knowledge gap becomes particularly acute when considering lignin as the most abundant terrestrial organic carbon, which accumulates in shelf-margin sediments through terrestrial runoff [12,13].
Lignin is composed of hydroxyphenylpropane monomers linked through various ether and carbon–carbon bonds [14–16], resulting from dehydrogenative polymerization [17]. The initial step in lignin biodegradation involves the action of extracellular lignin-degrading enzymes that catalyze the depolymerization of lignin [18–20]. Microorganisms utilize peroxidases such as laccase and dye-decolorizing peroxidase (DyP) [21,22]; coupled with supplementary enzyme systems, these biocatalysts orchestrate regioselective transformations: cleavage of intermonomeric β-O-4 bonds, separation of alkyl groups from aromatic moieties, methyl group elimination, and disruption of cyclic structures, thereby generating fragmented aromatic molecules. But lignin’s operational dynamics in oxic–suboxic transition zones remain enigmatic in cold seeps.
Previous efforts primarily characterized isolated enzyme systems [23–26], failing to capture how microbial community orchestrates the lignin degradation cascade (macromolecular depolymerization → aromatic monomer conversion → methanogenic precursor formation). This disconnect obscures critical linkages between terrestrial carbon export and marine methane reservoirs. Through laboratory enrichments and in situ analyses, we address 2 fundamental questions: (a) What enzymatic systems enable extracellular lignin modification in suboxic conditions? (b) How do degradation intermediates interface with methane-genic metabolic networks? Here, we employ a tripartite omics framework (metagenomics, metatranscriptomics, and metaproteomics) to dissect lignin transformation pathways in South China Sea cold seep surface sediments.
Quantitative lignin analysis across the Haima cold seep (0 to 25 cm) revealed substantial depleted lignin concentrations [vanillyl (V) phenols: 4.53 to 14.46 μg/g; syringyl (S) phenols: 0.09 to 4.33 μg/g; cinnamyl (C) phenols: 4.46 to 11.47 μg/g] compared to nearshore systems [27–29], establishing cold seeps as distinct lignin reservoirs. Molecular signature analysis (Table S2) identified nonwoody angiosperm sources as the predominant lignin origin (>0 of S/V and C/V ratios), contrasting with terrestrial-dominated coastal inputs. Vertical profiling demonstrated pronounced oxidative modification [P/(S +V): 0.55 to 2.78] across 5 sediment horizons, with the uppermost layer of HOV3 exhibiting relatively lower oxidative degradation and a higher presence of fresh tissues [(Ad/Al) v < 0.3]. This indicates the continuous input and accumulation of lignin in the study area.
Following the enrichment of surface sediment divided into 5 layers using lignin as the exclusive carbon substrate for enrichment (Fig. 1A), the mean residual solid lignin concentration across all microcosms ranged from 2.8 to 4.1 g at day 90. Notably, layer-specific differences in residual lignin were observed: Mean degradation rates were 34.0% ± 9.5% for layer 1, 40.0% ± 4.0% for layer 2, 22.0% ± 4.0% for layer 3, 26.0% ± 4.0% for layer 4, and 34.0% ± 4.0% for layer 5. Furthermore, distinct shifts in microbial communities were observed across a continuous time gradient. The PCoA (principal coordinates analysis) ordination based on Bray–Curtis distances (Fig. 1B) revealed progressive temporal divergence in community structure during enrichment, with trajectories shifting toward assemblages enriched with lignin-degrading taxa (e.g., Sphingomonadales and Burkholderiales), likely driven by functional adaptation to lignin utilization as the sole carbon source.
The number of core phyla decreased over the course of enrichment (Fig. S1), with microbial communities progressively converging toward core groups potentially capable of lignin utilization. With increasing incubation time, the dominant shared taxa were primarily affiliated with Gammaproteobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, and Bacteroidia (Fig. S1). Notably, orders such as Burkholderiales, Pseudomonadales, Parvibaculales, and Rhizobiales exhibited significant dominance in average relative abundance [Fig. 1C; analysis of variance (ANOVA), P < 0.05], and some of these were groups previously reported to be involved in lignin degradation [30–32]. Cluster analysis indicated that the variation in microbial communities along the time gradient was more pronounced than the differences between communities in different layers based on Bray–Curtis distances (Fig. S1). This could be attributed to the increased abundance of potential lignin decomposers.
Our analysis revealed dynamic lignin degradation patterns in cold seep sediments (Fig. 1 and Fig.S2). While quantitative lignin concentration data were excluded due to evaporation-induced volume variations in shake flask experiments, microbial taxonomic profiling identified key lignin-degrading consortia through functional gene analysis. Phylogenetic reconstruction based on 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene amplicons and metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) demonstrated conserved taxonomic patterns of lignin-degrading capacity across 21 bacterial orders, with Parvibaculales, Burkholderiales, Pseudomonadales, and Rhizobiales emerging as dominant degraders (Fig. 2A and B).
We observed a degradation change in lignin (Fig. S2). Due to the evaporation of the enriched liquid within the shake flasks, which resulted in significant differences in the liquid volumes inside the flasks, we did not present the lignin concentration. We analyzed microbial taxa possessing genetic components involved in metabolizing lignin and its low-molecular-weight derivatives. This result was similar to that of taxa resulting from 16S rRNA gene amplicon. At the order level, decomposers were primarily distributed across 21 orders, with Parvibaculales, Burkholderiales, Pseudomonadales, and Rhizobiales being the predominant degrading groups (Fig. 2A and B). The order Parvibaculales contains genes for lignin-decomposing DyPs, but due to their low abundance, high-quality MAGs were not obtained in this order; the order Oceanibaculales contains genes for glutathione-dependent β-etherases (LigEFG), and the MAGs (bin2, bin24, bin25, and bin29) suggest that Oceanibaculum nanhaiense plays a role in lignin degradation at the macromolecular level in the environment (Table S3).
The order Burkholderiales primarily participated in the metabolism of syringyl lignin fragments and the 3,4-PDOG pathway. Concurrently, we recovered 4 high-quality bins (bin15, bin22, bin3, and bin60) from the Burkholderiales order. These bins were highly abundant across the 5-layer samples and belonged to the genera Nitrogeniibacter and Pusillimonas, both of which contained genes from these 2 decomposition pathways (Table S3). The order Pseudomonadales participated in various steps of lignin fragment decomposition, such as the ferulic acid pathway (FerAB/B2) and the 3,4-PDOG pathway, and was also a highly abundant and metabolically active group. We assembled a total of 23 bins belonging to the Pseudomonadales order, of which 17 bins contained genes associated with lignin and its degradation, distributed across 8 different genera.
These microorganisms (Parvibaculales, Burkholderiales, Pseudomonadales, and Rhizobiales) constituted a relatively high proportion in the South China Sea cold seep ecosystem [1,13,33]. The diverse lignin degraders among them possessed significantly different degradation genes (Fig. S3). These microbial groups serve as pivotal contributors to degradation of lignin macromolecules within the cold seep ecosystem.
Reconstruction of lignin and aromatic fragment degradation pathways revealed stratified enzymatic strategies in cold seep sediments (Fig. 3). Genes encoding DyPs and glutathione-dependent β-etherases (LigEFG) were ubiquitously detected across all 5 sediment layers, implicating these enzymes as core mediators of lignin depolymerization. Notably, canonical pathways dependent on multicopper oxidases or Cα-dehydrogenases (LACs) were absent, suggesting niche-specific adaptation of oxidative machinery.
Beyond these depolymerases, multi-omics analysis profiling identified auxiliary oxidoreductases—including catalase, quinone oxidoreductase, aryl alcohol oxidase, and pyranose oxidase—acting as redox partners (Fig. S4 and Table S4) [34–36]. Catalase and quinone oxidoreductase exhibited consistent activity across layers, resolving a critical constraint in this system: While DyPs and lignin peroxidases (LiPs) require H2O2 to initiate radical-based cleavage [35], its intracellular toxicity necessitates tight regulation via catalase-mediated disproportionation. Concurrently, quinone oxidoreductases likely sustain extracellular redox balance during aromatic fragment processing [35], highlighting layered metabolic cooperation between depolymerization and detoxification modules.
Lignin, after extracellular depolymerization, yields various small molecular aromatic compounds, which are transported into the cell and undergo a series of peripheral catabolic pathways and central metabolic pathways [37]. In this study, lignin small molecular fragments were primarily degraded through 3 pathways: β-aryl ether fragments (⑥ and ⑦), syringyl lignin fragments (㉗ to ㉟), and diarylpropane fragments (⑦, ⑨, and ⑩; Fig. 3A), as the genes for these pathways presented high abundance in the metagenome and metatranscriptome (Fig. 3C). Genes for the biphenyl fragment pathway (LigXYZ) were essentially absent in both the metagenome and metatranscriptome. Genes for the ferulic acid fragments presented at low abundance in the metagenome of the 5-layer samples, but no transcriptional activity was detected across the layers.
Lignin biotransformation proceeds through sequential biochemical phases: initial extracellular depolymerization via oxidative enzymes (e.g., laccases/peroxidases) to yield aromatic oligomers, followed by intracellular funneling of these metabolites where aromatic ring fission proceeds, ultimately generating acetyl-CoA and succinyl-CoA for assimilation into central carbon metabolism. In this study, the degradation of smaller lignin molecule ring cleavage proceeds through the 4,5-PDOG and 3,4-PDOG pathways to the TCA cycle (tricarboxylic acid cycle), with relatively complete gene sets in both the metagenome and metatranscriptome (Fig. 3B). The metaproteomic results also indicate a relatively intact basic metabolic pathway (Fig. S2A).
We also interrogated the Carbon Cycle Database to demonstrate the broad carbon cycling capabilities of these taxa (Table S4). This additional comparison ensures that our analysis encompasses the wide-ranging potential of these microbial groups in carbon metabolism, which serves as a valuable resource for understanding the role of microorganisms in global carbon cycling.
CH4 is typically produced in anoxic sediments but can also be produced in oxic conditions [38]. To identify whether lignin-degrading bacteria can utilize intermediate products of lignin to produce methane under microoxic conditions, we transferred the enriched samples cultured for 90 d into sealed bottles and measured the methane production in 5-layer enrichment system. Methane gas production was monitored daily for 3 consecutive days. Methane gas was undetectable throughout the vertically stratified experimental system, maintaining consistency with control group under equivalent analytical protocols (Table S5; ANOVA, P < 0.05). We were unable to detect the key methane-producing genes mcrABG in enriched samples based on metagenomic (n = 5) and transcriptomic data (n = 5). This indicates that these lignin-degrading bacteria do not possess the capability to produce methane through the known pathway involving the mcr gene.
However, lignin-degrading enzymes facilitate the demethylation of methoxy (-OCH3) and methylated (-CH3) compounds within lignin [39], leading to the production of methylated small molecular compounds. These small molecules may serve as precursors for methane production in cold seep areas. We have reconstructed a metabolic pathway for methane production by the enriched microbial community (Fig. 4 and Fig. S3). We identified methane production precursor genes associated with lignin-degrading taxa, such as mtbC (found in Rhodobacterales and Streptosporangiales) and torACZ genes (present in Burkholderiales, Pseudomonadales, and Rhizobiales) (Fig. 4). The torACZ gene cluster catalyzed the enzymatic conversion of TMAO (trimethylamine-N-oxide) to TMA(trimethylamine) through a reductive biochemical pathway, representing a branch of methylotrophic methane generation [40]. The metaproteomic analysis revealed a considerable abundance of enzymes involved in these methane cycle processes (Fig. S4).
We identified 15 high-quality bins in species level (containing methane generation precursor process genes) with the capability to degrade lignin, after removing repetition. These species’ contributions to the methane generation precursors were annotated next to the related genes in Fig. 4. Unlike the anaerobic methanogenesis pathways in deep sedimentary that utilize nonmethylated precursors, lignin decomposition releases methyl group donors, establishing a unique shallow CH4 source with contributions to sediment–water interface methane fluxes.
Utilizing a global collection of cold seep metagenomes and metagenomes, we explore lignin-degrading communities based on the 1,495 bins (Table S6). Our findings revealed that 395 of these bins contained genes associated with lignin degradation (Table S7). Constructing a phylogenetic tree with these bins, we observed that these degrading communities were broad distribution within the orders Burkholderiales, Pseudomonadales, and Rhizobiales (Fig. 5B). Genomic analysis revealed a bipartite distribution of lignin-processing capacity: While a limited subset of bins harbored genetic determinants for macromolecular lignin depolymerization, the predominant fraction encoded enzymatic machinery specialized for catabolizing lignin-derived monomers, potentially through cross-pathway recruitment of conserved aromatic degradation orthologs. These degrading communities were distributed across 77 phyla, indicating a broad distribution of lignin degraders in globally representative cold seeps.
Our systematic dissection of lignin processing in the Haima cold seep reveals how microbial consortia govern specific refractory carbon turnover in these cold seep ecosystems. Quantitative sediment profiling identified fresh lignin inputs alongside degradation intermediates, confirming active processing of terrestrial organic matter in marine sediments. Genomically resolved degraders spanning Burkholderiales, Pseudomonadales, and Rhizobiales (Fig. 2) employ complementary oxidative strategies—DyPs and glutathione-dependent β-etherases (LigEFG)—to depolymerize lignin into β-aryl ether, syringyl, and diarylpropane fragments. These products subsequently enter central metabolism via convergent 4,5-PDOG and 3,4-PDOG pathways (Fig. 2A and B), with methylated derivatives potentially subsidizing near-surface methanogenesis through methylotrophic priming (Fig. 4). Crucially, the global prevalence of these degraders across cold seeps [41–44] suggests that lignin processing represents a ubiquitous but overlooked carbon flux in deep-sea cold seeps.
The temporal community divergence may stem from lignin-driven selective pressures that progressively favored specialized taxa through resource partitioning, metabolic adaptation, and cooperative interactions [45,46]. As lignin became the sole carbon source, competitive exclusion shifted communities from generalist heterotrophs (day 0) to lignin-specialized assemblages (days 7, 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90) (Fig. 1B), dominated by taxa (e.g., Sphingomonadales and Burkholderiales) with enzymatic machinery (e.g., laccases/peroxidases) for cleaving rate-limiting β-aryl ether linkages (Figs. 1C and 2). This metabolic specialization was amplified by in situ enzymatic induction and cross-feeding networks, where primary degraders converted complex lignin into metabolites that sustained secondary utilizers [47], creating syntrophic feedback loops that reinforced the community’s functional adaptation to lignin utilization.
The first step of lignin biodegradation is to depolymerize lignin through extracellular lignin depolymerase. Ligninolytic enzymes employ diverse catalytic mechanisms for polymer decomposition. Laccases (LACs), classified as multicopper oxidoreductases, facilitate lignin depolymerization through radical-mediated oxidation processes mediated by their tetra-nuclear copper cluster [48]. The β-O-4 aryl ether linkages—predominant structural motifs in lignin—undergo specific cleavage through 2 distinct enzymatic systems: NAD+-dependent Cα-dehydrogenase (LigD) catalyzes α-carbon oxidation, while the glutathione-dependent LigEFG complex mediates β-ether bond cleavage through nucleophilic thiolysis [49–51]. Furthermore, peroxidase family enzymes demonstrate significant oxidative capacity in lignin modification through hydrogen peroxide-dependent radical chain reactions [46,52]. Previous studies indicate that the most frequently detected lignin-degrading gene families in terrestrial ecosystems include dypA, dypB, laCs, and mnP, among others. Terrestrial ecosystems harbor both aerobic and anaerobic lignin degradation pathways, with aerobic pathways being more abundant [53]. In contrast, our study discovered that in the Haima cold seep and globally representative cold seeps, genes encoding enzymes (LigEFG, DyPs) for lignin depolymerization. Degradation proceeds via both aerobic and anaerobic processes, and analysis of enrichment cultures enables the detection of gene signatures associated with anaerobic pathways such as aor, phhB, and tyrB (Fig. S5 and Table S9). We found that a total of 169 bins contained the phhB gene, 336 bins contained the tyrB gene, and no bins contained the aor gene, which is a key gene for the anaerobic process of lignin degradation (Table S10).
In previous estuarine studies, genes such as lacCs, dyPs, and ligD were found to be involved in the depolymerization of lignin [54,55]. In coastal ecosystems, the laccase gene family exhibits high abundance, highlighting its critical role in lignin decomposition within these environments [26,53]. While the abundance of gene families associated with aerobic and anaerobic degradation pathways remains relatively balanced in coastal ecosystems, an increasing trend in the abundance of anaerobic pathway-related gene families has been observed [26,56]. In Haima cold seep, canonical pathways dependent on multicopper oxidases or Cα-dehydrogenases (LACs) were absent, suggesting niche-specific adaptation of oxidative machinery. These findings underscore the intricate variations in lignin depolymerization processes observed among distinct ecosystems. Furthermore, the metabolic routes involved in breaking down lignin-derived aromatic compounds exhibit notable parallels to decomposition pathways documented in estuarine sediments, geothermal wetlands, and terrestrial soil matrices [57–62], with protocatechuic acid being cleaved through 2 distinct routes: the 4,5-PDOG pathway and the 3,4-PDOG pathway.
In terrestrial ecosystems, lignin degradation is primarily mediated by synergistic interactions between fungi and bacteria, with mechanisms exhibiting significant ecosystem specificity [63]. White-rot fungi (e.g., Phanerochaete chrysosporium) are the dominant degraders in forest ecosystems, employing secreted ligninolytic enzymes such as LiP, manganese peroxidase (MnP), and laccase to oxidatively dismantle lignin via nonspecific radical reactions that disrupt its aromatic backbone [63,64]. In temperate forests, enzyme activity correlates strongly with climatic conditions; for example, beech forests exhibit concurrent MnP, LiP, and laccase activity, while pine forests rely predominantly on LiP, with degradation rates positively linked to temperature [65]. In contrast, grassland and agricultural systems depend more on bacterial degraders (e.g., Rhodococcus spp.), which utilize dioxygenases and demethylases to break down lignin monomers and employ microbial consortia to degrade lignin–cellulose complexes [66]. Notably, the low pH of forest soils favors fungal activity, resulting in higher lignin oxidation rates compared to grasslands and farmlands [66].
In previously studied marine ecosystems, lignin degradation is predominantly bacterial, with Gammaproteobacteria (e.g., Alteromonadaceae and Idiomarinaceae) and Alphaproteobacteria excelling in oligotrophic and high-salinity environments through phenylacetyl-CoA (PA-CoA) pathways [67]. Unlike terrestrial systems, marine fungi (e.g., Ascomycota and Basidiomycota) are scarce, constituting less than 2% of microbial communities [67]. Studies show that marine bacteria achieve lignin mineralization rates of 10% to 20%, relying on dynamic interspecies interactions [68]. In anaerobic sediments, Bathyarchaeota contribute to lignin metabolism through demethylation and aromatic ring cleavage, producing acetate for methanogens and forming carbon cycling networks [69,70]. Coastal sediments harbor Proteobacteria and Firmicutes that drive carbon cycling via reconstructed lignin-degrading networks (e.g., β-ketoadipate and protocatechuate branches) [71]. In deep-sea cold seep ecosystems, our analysis based on species-level bins revealed the involvement of certain groups, such as Methylophaga thalassica, which had not been previously reported to possess lignin degradation functions. M. thalassica carries genes (praD, praF, praG) involved in degrading late-stage lignin-derived small molecules. Global seep analysis identified archaeal bins harboring lignin-degrading genes, mainly including Asgardarchaeota and Thermoplasmatota (Tables S8 and S10). Notably, no archaeal bins were found to participate in active lignin-utilizing microbial consortia or their associated metabolic pathways under aerobic enrichment conditions (Tables S8 and S10).
In this study, we combined methane gas detection and functional gene analysis, revealing that lignin-degrading bacteria enriched under aerobic conditions lack complete methanogenesis pathways [13,72]. However, these bacteria play a critical role in generating methyl group precursors (e.g., methanol and methylamines) through lignin depolymerization. Under oxygen-limited conditions, isolates like Klebsiella sp. LEA1 metabolize lignin into methylated phenols (e.g., 4-vinyl guaiacol) and aromatic acids [73], which may serve as substrates for methylotrophic methanogens. In cold seeps, hydrogen-dependent methylotrophic methanogens (e.g., Methanomassiliococcales) utilize these methyl compounds coupled with H₂ [2,4]. Our study identified 15 species-level MAGs encoding key enzymes for methyl transfer (e.g., mtaB and mttC) and corrinoid cofactor metabolism (Fig. 4), consistent with methylotrophic methanogenesis reported in seep sediments [33]. Persistent deposition of lignocellulose provides sustained carbon input, while microbial redox cycling (e.g., Fe3+/Fe2+ and S0/HS−) generates methylotrophic byproducts [74]. This may create anoxic microniches conducive to shallow subsurface methanogenesis near the sediment–water interface. The contribution of this methyl-shunt to CH₄ emissions may be further amplified in shallow zones where methanotrophic activity is suppressed, rendering its impact on sediment-surface CH₄ fluxes non-negligible.
Previous laboratory and natural condition studies have indicated that the degradation period for most microbes targeting lignin was relatively long, ranging from 30 to 60 d, with degradation rates between 20% and 50% [37,46,75,76]. Our cultivation time conditions were conducive to the enrichment of lignin degraders, and changes in the community were detected through PCoA analysis. Taxa such as Burkholderiales, Pseudomonadales, and Parvibaculales, which possess lignin degradation genes, increased significantly over time, demonstrating the effectiveness of our enrichment conditions. We have recovered a group of high-quality bins with lignin degradation capabilities, allowing for a more precise identification of lignin degraders at the species level, which is relatively innovative in the context of cold seep studies. Our laboratory-based experiments could not fully replicate complex in situ conditions, which may limit direct quantitative extrapolation to natural environments. Specifically, the absence of native environmental pressures (e.g., high hydrostatic pressure characteristic of cold seeps) and potential differences in substrate availability/accessibility within the sediment matrix in our enrichment system could alter microbial activity, community dynamics, and, thus, the representativeness of the enriched degraders and their degradation kinetics compared to the true in situ process. While these limitations may affect kinetic rates or absolute degradation efficiencies, our qualitative findings on lignin-degrading consortia and key functional taxa (e.g., dominant bacterial degraders and enzymatic pathways) should remain robust. To address these constraints and improve our understanding of in situ lignin degradation in cold seeps, future studies should employ in situ approaches. This will include deploying high-pressure cultivation systems to simulate the deep-sea conditions, combined with stable isotope probing (SIP) using isotopically labeled lignin substrates. SIP will allow us to directly link metabolic activity to taxonomic identity under relevant pressure conditions, providing a more authentic picture of the key lignin-degrading microorganisms and their functional roles in situ.
Cold seep ecosystems possess a remarkably robust capacity for lignin degradation. Identifying and confirming the primary microbial pathways for lignin carbon decomposition within these environments is an essential foundational work. Our research has uncovered a suite of cold seep microbial communities with the potential for lignin degradation, which are distributed across taxa such as Burkholderiales, Pseudomonadales, and Rhizobiales. These groups acted on the depolymerization of lignin through genes encoding dyPs and ligEFG, and subsequently, the breakdown primarily followed 3 pathways: β-aryl ether fragments, syringyl lignin fragments, and diarylpropane fragment. The degradation of smaller lignin molecules then proceeded through the 4,5-PDOG and 3,4-PDOG pathways, entering the TCA cycle. Methylated small-molecule compounds produced from lignin degradation may serve as precursors for methane production in cold seep regions. This evidence the diverse ecological strategies of cold seep microbes and broadens our understanding. The lignin-degrading communities we have identified were widely distributed across global cold seeps and exhibit relatively high abundance, indicating the widespread capacity for lignin degradation among sedimentary microbes in cold seeps.
Sediment sampling was conducted at the Haima cold seep site (16°43′N, 110°28′E) located on the northern continental shelf of the South China Sea during April 2023. The collection was performed at a water depth of 1,384 m using a box core sampler with 30-cm penetration depth during the scientific cruise organized by R/V “Kexue”. Seafloor surface sediments were successfully retrieved through standardized box corer deployment procedures, ensuring minimal disturbance to sediment–water interface integrity. Immediately following core retrieval, sediment samples were stabilized through prompt transfer to 4 °C temperature-controlled shipboard storage chambers, where controlled preservation effectively suppressed exogenous microbial metabolisms.
Surface sediments from the cold seep (0 to 25 cm) were collected in 5 stratified layers, with 5 g of each layer mixed with 20 ml of sterilized water to form a slurry. The slurry was equally distributed into conical flasks in triplicate, with 6 ml allocated to each flask. Each flask received 5 g of alkaline lignin (99.9% purity, CAS 8068-05-1; Sigma-Aldrich) as the sole carbon source in a layered cultivation system. Samples were placed into flasks and diluted with sterile water to achieve 150-ml total volume for enrichment culture. Triplicate samples were taken for each layer, yielding a total of 15 treatments. Enrichment conditions were maintained at pH 6 with a shaking speed of 110 rpm in the dark. Samples were collected at 7 time points—0, 7, 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 d—over a 3-month experimental period. This resulted in a total of 105 samples, with each time point having 5 layers and 3 replicates.
The in situ collected surface sediments (0 to 25 cm) were equally divided into 5 layers, and each layer was measured separately for lignin parameters. After the sediment was naturally air-dried to constant weight, the total organic carbon content of 1-g sediment was determined using a TOC (total organic carbon) analyzer (TOC-VCPN; Shimadzu Corp., Tokyo, Japan). Lignin biomarker quantification was performed following standardized protocols outlined in prior studies [77,78], with method validation through spike recovery tests. The analytical workflow commenced with microwave-assisted alkaline oxidative hydrolysis (165 °C × 3.5 h) using a CEM MARS5 microwave reactor (300 W maximum power). Approximately 2 g of homogenized sediment aliquots was combined in Teflon-lined digestion vessels with reagent-grade CuO, (NH4)Fe(SO4)2 solution, and 2 M NaOH. After undergoing nitrogen sparging, reaction vessels underwent controlled thermal decomposition under inert atmosphere. Post-hydrolysis cooling to ambient temperature facilitated addition of ethyl vanillin as quantitative internal standard, achieving 95% ± 2% mean recovery across triplicate analyses.
Phase separation was achieved through sequential liquid–liquid extraction with ethyl acetate:petroleum ether (99:1 v/v). The combined organic phases were concentrated under N2 stream and derivatized with BSTFA [N,O-bis(trimethylsilyl)tri fluoroacetamide]:TMCS (trimethylchlorosilane) (99:1). Final analysis employed an Agilent 6890N GC-FID system equipped with a DB-1 capillary column, as detailed in [79].
Following incubation, lignin degradation was quantified gravimetrically. After 90 d of treatment, samples were filtered through 0.2-μm membrane filters (Millipore, USA). Lignin retained on the filters was collected, dried overnight at 45 °C in a drying oven, and weighed. The percentage of lignin weight loss was calculated as follows:
PW=W0−WT/W0×100%
where W0 represents the initial lignin weight (g) and WT denotes the dry weight (g) at the endpoint (90 d).
All measurements were performed in triplicate.
On day 90, 15 ml of lignin-enriched suspension samples from the remaining materials was transferred into sealed, light-protected 50-ml glass bottles, with 3 replicates set for each layer and placed in a shaker for cultivation at 25 °C with a rotation speed of 110 rpm. A control was also set up, with the addition of 15 ml of sterilized water. Headspace gas sampling (10 ml/day) was conducted using evacuated aluminized gas sampling bags. To maintain isobaric conditions during gas extraction, a dual-syringe system was implemented: One syringe withdrew gas samples, while a second simultaneously delivered 10 ml of ultrapure helium as pressure compensation. Following sampling, vessels were uncapped and aerated for 30 min under ambient conditions. Methane gas quantification was performed via wavelength-scanned cavity ring-down spectroscopy (WS-CRDS, Picarro G2201-i) with 1-Hz sampling frequency [80]. For 5 treatment groups and 1 control group, samples were collected continuously over 3 d, resulting in a total of 54 gas samples (3 d * 6 treatments * 3 replicates).
Protein extraction from day 90 samples (n = 5) was conducted following cryogenic protocols. After ice-thawing, samples were homogenized in BPP buffer (200 mM Tris-Base, 200 mM NaCl, 50 mM vitamin C, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 1% NP-40, 1% Tween 20, 5 mM EDTA, 30% sugar, 50 mM sodium tetraborate, 1% PVPP) using mechanical disruption and centrifuged (12,000g, 4 °C, 20 min). Sequential phenol partitioning was performed with tris-saturated phenol under vortexing (10 min, 4 °C), followed by phase separation through successive centrifugations. Proteins were precipitated overnight in ammonium acetate–methanol (−20 °C) and washed twice with 90% acetone. Pellets were resolubilized in denaturing buffer [8 M urea, 1% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate), protease inhibitors] with ultrasonic assistance (2-min ice bath). Post-centrifugation supernatants underwent BCA (bicinchoninic acid) quantification (Thermo Scientific kit) against bovine serum albumin standards. Electrophoretic validation was performed using Laemmli SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis [63] under reducing conditions (150 V, 60 min) [81].
Protein samples (100 μg) underwent sequential processing in TEAB (triethylammonium bicarbonate) buffer: reduction with 10 mM TCEP [Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine; 37 °C, 60 min], cysteine blocking via 40 mM IAM (iodoacetamide; room temperature, dark, 40 min), and clarification by centrifugation (10,000g, 4 °C, 20 min). Trypsin digestion (1:50 w/w, 37 °C, 16 h) preceded peptide desalting (HLB cartridges, Oasis HLB 96-well Plate, Waters) after vacuum drying. Reconstituted peptides in 0.1% TFA (trifluoroacetic acid) were quantified spectrophotometrically (NanoDrop One) with external calibration [81].
Total nucleic acid from 105 samples was co-isolated via Total RNA Isolation kit (QIAGEN, Germany). RNA was collected from RNA Capture Columns. Retained columns enabled sequential DNA elution (RNA QIAGEN DNA Elution Accessory kit). After merging duplicates, 16S rRNA gene amplicons (515F-Y and 926R) from samples (n = 35) were sequenced [82]. For the 90th day sampling, a subset underwent metagenome (n = 5) and metatranscriptome (n = 5) sequencing. Following preprocessing steps, amplicon and metagenome/metatranscriptome sequencing were performed using Illumina NovaSeq 6000 systems (PE250 and PE150) via MAGIGENE (Guangzhou, China), respectively.
The raw sequencing data were processed as per established protocols [83]. Specifically, paired-end reads were consolidated using USEARCH v11, with primers excised employing CUTADAPT v2.4 software, operationalized with the parameters “--no-indels-e 0 --discard-unrimmed” [84]. Thereafter, low-quality reads defined as length <350 base pairs (bp) or maximum expected error >1.0 were stringently removed. The retained high-quality reads were grouped into amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) using the unoise3 algorithm [85]. Taxonomic assignment of ASVs was conducted with the naïve Bayes classifier [86] through SILVA 138 database analysis in the QIIME2 environment [87]. After removing ASVs unclassified as bacterial or archaeal, a curated ASV table was generated by mapping primer-trimmed reads to the ASVs’ reference sequences, thereby elucidating the microbial taxonomy with precision.
Metagenomic sequencing data were subjected to processing in alignment with prior documentation [88]. Low-quality sequences and adapter contaminants were trimmed from raw data using fastp (v0.23.4) [89], followed by scaffold reconstruction of processed reads via SPAdes (v3.15.2) [90]. Open reading frames (ORFs) were computationally predicted for scaffolds >500 bp using Prodigal (v2.6.3) [91]. These ORFs were compiled into a deduplicated gene catalog with CD-HIT-EST (v4.8.1) at 95% identity and 90% coverage thresholds. For metatranscriptomic data, we deployed fastp v0.23.4 to purge low-quality sequences and adapter remnants, and RiboDetector [92] to eliminate rRNA sequences with the parameter “-e rrna”. ORF abundance and transcriptional activity [expressed as reads per kilobase per million mapped reads (RPKM)] were determined by aligning metagenomic/metatranscriptomic reads to the deduplicated gene catalog via Bowtie2 v2.5 [93] and CoverM v0.6.1, with thresholds of 95% identity, 80% read alignment, and 60% coverage. MAGs were extracted from metagenomic datasets and polished using MetaWRAP [94]. MAG quality was evaluated via CheckM v1.0.12 [95], while PROKKA v1.12 annotated MAGs meeting high-quality criteria (>60% completeness, <5% contamination) [96].
We constructed a lignin database comprising a comprehensive collection of lignolytic enzyme sequences, curated from published literature [53,97]. The deduplicated gene dataset was screened against these reference proteins using DIAMOND v0.9 with thresholds “--id 50 --query-cover 80” [98]. Cumulative RPKM values for ORFs encoding target enzymes were calculated to quantify ligninolytic potential. Gene expression patterns were analyzed to estimate pathway activation status. Bacterial genomes (MAGs) associated with lignin degradation were identified through protein sequence comparison against the reference database using DIAMOND v0.9. Genomic assignments to specific metabolic pathways were determined through systematic evaluation of enzymatic gene inventories within each MAG. To determine taxonomic assignments of ligninolytic-associated genes, alignments were performed against the GTDB r95 proteome database using DIAMOND v0.9 with “—evalue 0.00001 -k 10” parameters. Taxonomic classification for each gene was established by applying the Last Common Ancestor (LCA) algorithm to the 10 highest-ranking matches. Taxonomic consistency between databases was ensured by converting GTDB classifications to National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) taxonomy through the GTDB-provided mapping file.
Additionally, we employed the LCdb database to identify lignin-degrading genes from deduplicated gene dataset. Protein sequences were aligned against the LCdb reference database using DIAMOND v2.0.14. Then, alignment results were functionally annotated using a custom Python script. To investigate the distribution of lignin-degrading genes in global cold seep ecosystems, we analyzed MAGs identified through protein sequence comparison against the LCdb database [53].
We downloaded the carbon cycling database CcycDB (https://ccycdb.github.io/) and the methane cycling database McycDB (https://github.com/qichao1984/). Subsequently, using DIAMOND v0.9 with parameters set as described in the literature [40], we interrogated the nonredundant gene catalog obtained above against the sequences in these databases. Gene expression patterns of these target genes were analyzed to assess corresponding pathway activation states. Furthermore, MAG-derived ORFs were identified through database sequence alignment. Systematic evaluation of enzymatic gene inventories enabled precise mapping of MAGs to methane metabolism pathways.
For the data-independent acquisition (DIA) raw data analysis, Spectronaut software (Version 18) was utilized [99]. Quantitative profiling utilized 6 peptides per protein with 3 fragment ions per peptide, under the following parameters: protein false discovery rate (FDR) cutoff ≤0.01%, peptide FDR ≤0.01%, identification confidence ≥99%, and XIC mass tolerance ≤75 parts per million [99]. Peptides that were shared or modified were excluded from the analysis. Quantification results were derived through integration and summation of chromatographic peak intensities [100]. Protein identification was conducted solely for those proteins possessing at least one unique peptide. Proteomic data processing was conducted via the Majorbio Cloud Platform (https://cloud.majorbio.com), followed by metagenome-informed functional annotation of all detected proteins [101].
Metagenomic assemblies (MAGs) derived from 68 sediment specimens obtained from 6 globally representative cold seep ecosystems were retrieved from public repositories [7,41,72]. Sediment cores encompassed vertical redox zonation across 430-cm subseafloor depth, transitioning from oxic surficial zones to sulfidic strata at the sediment–water interface. These MAG data were species-delineated based on a 95% average nucleotide identity threshold, recovering a total of 1,427 species-level clusters. In combination with the 68 bins from our lignin-enriched samples, we obtained 1,495 species-level clusters in total (1,214 bacteria and 281 archaea; Table S6), which were discerned against a lignin database. Metagenomic bins harboring genetic determinants for lignin metabolism were subjected to phylogenetic reconstruction through maximum likelihood analysis implemented in the Phylophlan 3.0 platform (v3.7.1) [102]. Subsequent topological visualization of the refined phylogenetic tree (RAxML_bestTree.refined.tre) was executed using the Interactive Tree of Life interface (iTOL v6.7.3) [103].
Statistical evaluation of lignin composition (components, sources, and characteristics), temporal stratification effects on microbiome community, and methane accumulation gas was performed using one-way ANOVA. The computational framework incorporated customized analytical pipelines executed in R version 4.2.2, leveraging both base statistical functions and specialized ecological analysis modules from the vegan package (v2.6-4) for comprehensive multivariate comparisons across 5 distinct sedimentary horizons.
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China(42494884)
  • Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation, China(2025A1515010959)
1.
Jiang Q, Jing H, Jiang Q, Zhang Y. Insights into carbon-fixation pathways through metagonomics in the sediments of deep-sea cold seeps. Mar Pollut Bull. 2022;176:Article 113458.
2.
Lv Y, Yang S, Xiao X, Zhang Y. Stimulated organic carbon cycling and microbial community shift driven by a simulated cold-seep eruption. MBio. 2022;13(2):Article e0008722.
3.
Yang S, Lv Y, Liu X, Wang Y, Fan Q, Yang Z, Boon N, Wang F, Xiao X, Zhang Y. Genomic and enzymatic evidence of acetogenesis by anaerobic methanotrophic archaea. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):Article 3941.
4.
Boetius A, Wenzhöfer F. Seafloor oxygen consumption fuelled by methane from cold seeps. Nat Geosci. 2013;6(9):725–734.
5.
Jiang Q, Jing H, Liu H, Du M. Biogeographic distributions of microbial communities associated with anaerobic methane oxidation in the surface sediments of deep-sea cold seeps in the South China Sea. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:Article 1060206.
6.
Feng J, Yan J, Wang Y, Yang Z, Zhang S, Liang S, Li X. Methane mitigation: Learning from the natural marine environment. Innovation. 2022;3(5):Article 100297.
7.
Dong X, Peng Y, Wang M, Woods L, Wu W, Wang Y, Xiao X, Li J, Jia K, Greening C, et al.Evolutionary ecology of microbial populations inhabiting deep sea sediments associated with cold seeps. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):Article 1127.
8.
Wu X, Feng J, Chen X, Li C, Zhang S. Exploring carbon content variation in microplastics sequestrated from seawater to sediment in the Haima cold seep area. J Hazard Mater. 2024;462:Article 132742.
9.
Zhang X, Du Z, Zheng R, Luan Z, Qi F, Cheng K, Wang B, Ye W, Liu X, Lian C, et al.Development of a new deep-sea hybrid Raman insertion probe and its application to the geochemistry of hydrothermal vent and cold seep fluids. Deep-Sea Res Pt I Oceanogr Res Pap. 2017;123:1–12.
10.
Zhai X, Shi X, Cheng H, Yao P, Zhao B, Chen L, Liu J, Cao L, Wang M, Fu L, et al.Horizontal and vertical heterogeneity of sediment microbial community in Site F cold seep, the South China Sea. Front Mar Sci. 2022;9:Article 957762.
11.
Muyzer G, Stams AJM. The ecology and biotechnology of sulphate-reducing bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008;6(6):441–454.
12.
Bhattarai S, Cassarini C, Lens PNL. Physiology and distribution of archaeal methanotrophs that couple anaerobic oxidation of methane with sulfate reduction. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2019;83(3):Article e00074-18.
13.
Feng D, Qiu J, Hu Y, Peckmann J, Guan H, Tong H, Chen C, Chen J, Gong S, Li N, et al.Cold seep systems in the South China Sea: An overview. J Asian Earth Sci. 2018;168:3–16.
14.
Kandasamy S, Nath BN. Perspectives on the terrestrial organic matter transport and burial along the land-deep sea continuum: Caveats in our understanding of biogeochemical processes and future needs. Front Mar Sci. 2016;3:Article 00259.
15.
Schlunz B, Schneider RR. Transport of terrestrial organic carbon to the oceans by rivers: Re-estimating flux- and burial rates. Int J Earth Sci. 2000;88(4):599–606.
16.
Yu S, Zhou Y, Gan M, Chen L, Xie Y, Zhong Y, Feng Q, Chen C. Lignocellulose-based optical biofilter with high near-infrared transmittance via lignin capturing–fusing approach. Research. 2023;6:Article 0250.
17.
Kamimura N, Sakamoto S, Mitsuda N, Masai E, Kajita S. Advances in microbial lignin degradation and its applications. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2019;56:179–186.
18.
Chen Z, Wan C. Biological valorization strategies for converting lignin into fuels and chemicals. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2017;73:610–621.
19.
Lou Y, Sun X, Yu Y, Zeng S, Li Y, Liu Y, Yu H. One-pot protolignin extraction by targeted unlocking lignin–carbohydrate esters via nucleophilic addition–elimination strategy. Research. 2023;6:Article 0069.
20.
Qu X, Zhao Y, Za C, Wang S, Ren Y, Wang Q, Shao J, Wang W, Dong X. Thermoresponsive lignin-reinforced poly(ionic liquid) hydrogel wireless strain sensor. Research. 2021;2021:Article 9845482.
21.
Palazzolo MA, Kurina-Sanz M. Microbial utilization of lignin: Available biotechnologies for its degradation and valorization. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;32(10):Article 173.
22.
Abdelaziz OY, Brink DP, Prothmann J, Ravi K, Sun M, García-Hidalgo J, Sandahl M, Hulteberg CP, Turner C, Lidén G, et al.Biological valorization of low molecular weight lignin. Biotechnol Adv. 2016;34(8):1318–1346.
23.
Bonin P, Portas A, Hardy J, Guasco S, Bianchi TS, Ward ND, Rontani J-F. Biological mechanisms underlying priming of vascular plant material in the presence of diatoms. Aquat Microb Ecol. 2023;89:99–117.
24.
Dang Y, Cha Q, Liu S, Wang S, Li P, Li C, Wang P, Chen X, Tian J, Xin Y, et al.Phytoplankton-derived polysaccharides and microbial peptidoglycans are key nutrients for deep-sea microbes in the Mariana Trench. Microbiome. 2024;12(1):Article 77.
25.
Leadbeater DR, Oates NC, Bennett JP, Li Y, Dowle AA, Taylor JD, Alponti JS, Setchfield AT, Alessi AM, Helgason T, et al.Mechanistic strategies of microbial communities regulating lignocellulose deconstruction in a UK salt marsh. Microbiome. 2021;9(1):Article 48.
26.
Peng Q, Lin L, Tu Q, Wang X, Zhou Y, Chen J, Jiao N, Zhou J. Unraveling the roles of coastal bacterial consortia in degradation of various lignocellulosic substrates. mSystems. 2023;8(4):Article e0128322.
27.
Bao H, Wu Y, Zhan X, Wang X, Spencer RGM, Hernes PJJ, Feng X, Lee L, Huang J, Zhang J, et al.Global riverine export of dissolved lignin constrained by hydrology, geomorphology, and land-cover. Glob Biogeochem Cycles. 2023;37(4):Article e2022GB007607.
28.
Spencer RGM, Stubbins A, Hernes PJ, Baker A, Mopper K, Aufdenkampe AK, Dyda RY, Mwamba VL, Mangangu AM, Wabakanghanzi JN, et al.Photochemical degradation of dissolved organic matter and dissolved lignin phenols from the Congo River. J Geophys Res Biogeosci. 2009;114(G3):Article 2009JG000968.
29.
Dittmar T, Hertkorn N, Kattner G, Lara RJ. Mangroves, a major source of dissolved organic carbon to the oceans. Glob Biogeochem Cycles. 2006;20(1):Article 2005GB002570.
30.
Ahmad M, Taylor CR, Pink D, Burton K, Eastwood D, Bending GD, Bugg TD. Development of novel assays for lignin degradation: Comparative analysis of bacterial and fungal lignin degraders. Mol BioSyst. 2010;6(5):815–821.
31.
Brink DP, Ravi K, Lidén G, Gorwa-Grauslund MF. Mapping the diversity of microbial lignin catabolism: Experiences from the eLignin database. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019;103(10):3979–4002.
32.
Bugg TD, Ahmad M, Hardiman EM, Rahmanpour R. Pathways for degradation of lignin in bacteria and fungi. Nat Prod Rep. 2011;28(12):1883–1896.
33.
Zhang H, Wang M, Wang H, Chen H, Cao L, Zhong Z, Lian C, Zhou L, Li C. Metagenome sequencing and 768 microbial genomes from cold seep in South China Sea. Sci Data. 2022;9(1):Article 480.
34.
Brown ME, Walker MC, Nakashige TG, Iavarone AT, Chang MCY. Discovery and characterization of heme enzymes from unsequenced bacteria: Application to microbial lignin degradation. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133(45):18006–18009.
35.
Yamada Y, Wang J, Kawagishi H, Hirai H. Improvement of ligninolytic properties by recombinant expression of glyoxal oxidase gene in hyper lignin-degrading fungus Phanerochaete sordida YK-624. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2014;78(12):2128–2133.
36.
Ma J, Zhang K, Liao H, Hector SB, Shi X, Li J, Liu B, Xu T, Tong C, Liu X, et al.Genomic and secretomic insight into lignocellulolytic system of an endophytic bacterium Pantoea ananatis Sd-1. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016;9(1):Article 25.
37.
Atiwesh G, Parrish CC, Banoub J, Le TT. Lignin degradation by microorganisms: A review. Biotechnol Prog. 2022;38(2):Article e3226.
38.
Peeters F, Hofmann H. Oxic methanogenesis is only a minor source of lake-wide diffusive CH4 emissions from lakes. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):Article 1206.
39.
Mallinson SJB, Machovina MM, Silveira RL, Garcia-Borràs M, Gallup N, Johnson CW, Allen MD, Skaf MS, Crowley MF, Neidle EL, et al.A promiscuous cytochrome P450 aromatic O-demethylase for lignin bioconversion. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):Article 2487.
40.
Qian L, Yu X, Zhou J, Gu H, Ding J, Peng Y, He Q, Tian Y, Liu J, Wang S, et al.MCycDB: A curated database for comprehensively profiling methane cycling processes of environmental microbiomes. Mol Ecol Resour. 2022;22(5):1803–1823.
41.
Dong X, Rattray JE, Campbell DC, Webb J, Chakraborty A, Adebayo O, Matthews S, Li C, Fowler M, Morrison NM, et al.Thermogenic hydrocarbon biodegradation by diverse depth-stratified microbial populations at a Scotian Basin cold seep. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):Article 5825.
42.
Han Y, Zhang C, Zhao Z, Peng Y, Liao J, Jiang Q, Liu Q, Shao Z, Dong X. A comprehensive genomic catalog from global cold seeps. Sci Data. 2023;10(1):Article 596.
43.
Quan Q, Liu J, Li C, Ke Z, Tan Y. Insights into prokaryotic communities and their potential functions in biogeochemical cycles in cold seep. mSphere. 2024;9(10):Article e0054924.
44.
Chen J, Jia Y, Sun Y, Liu K, Zhou C, Liu C, Li D, Liu G, Zhang C, Yang T, et al.Global marine microbial diversity and its potential in bioprospecting. Nature. 2024;633(8029):371–379.
45.
Levy-Booth DJ, Navas LE, Fetherolf MM, Liu LY, Dalhuisen T, Renneckar S, Eltis LD, Mohn WW. Discovery of lignin-transforming bacteria and enzymes in thermophilic environments using stable isotope probing. ISME J. 2022;16(8):1944–1956.
46.
Zhao L, Zhang J, Zhao D, Jia L, Qin B, Cao X, Zang L, Lu F, Liu F. Biological degradation of lignin: A critical review on progress and perspectives. Ind Crop Prod. 2022;188:Article 115715.
47.
Zhang R, Wang J, Milligan S, Yan Y. Microbial utilization of lignin-derived aromatics via a synthetic catechol meta-cleavage pathway. Green Chem. 2021;23(20):8238–8250.
48.
Sirim D, Wagner F, Wang L, Schmid RD, Pleiss J. The laccase engineering database: A classification and analysis system for laccases and related multicopper oxidases. Database. 2011;2011:Article bar006.
49.
Wang X, Lin L, Zhou J. Links among extracellular enzymes, lignin degradation and cell growth establish the models to identify marine lignin-utilizing bacteria. Environ Microbiol. 2021;23(1):160–173.
50.
Marinović M, Nousiainen P, Dilokpimol A, Kontro J, Moore R, Sipilä J, de Vries RP, Mäkelä MR, Hildén K. Selective cleavage of lignin β-O-4 aryl ether bond by β-etherase of the white-rot fungus Dichomitus squalens. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2018;6(3):2878–2882.
51.
Pereira JH, Heins RA, Gall DL, McAndrew RP, Deng K, Holland KC, Donohue TJ, Noguera DR, Simmons BA, Sale KL, et al.Structural and biochemical characterization of the early and late enzymes in the lignin β-aryl ether cleavage pathway from Sphingobium sp. SYK-6*. J Biol Chem. 2016;291(19):10228–10238.
52.
Hendel B, Sinsabaugh RL, Marxsen J. Lignin-degrading enzymes: Phenoloxidase and peroxidase. In: Bärlocher F, Gessner MO, Graça MAS, editors. Methods to study litter decomposition: A practical guide. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. p. 425–431.
53.
Chen J, Lin L, Tu Q, Peng Q, Wang X, Liang C, Zhou J, Yu X. Metagenomic-based discovery and comparison of the lignin degrading potential of microbiomes in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems via the LCdb database. Mol Ecol Resour. 2024;24(5):Article e13950.
54.
Dittmar T, Lara RJ. Molecular evidence for lignin degradation in sulfate-reducing mangrove sediments (Amazônia, Brazil). Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2001;65(9):1417–1428.
55.
Li J, Duan L, Wu Y, Ahmad M, Yin L, Luo X, Wang X, Fang B, Li S, Huang L, et al.Unraveling microbe-mediated degradation of lignin and lignin-derived aromatic fragments in the Pearl River Estuary sediments. Chemosphere. 2022;296:Article 133995.
56.
Ma W, Lin L, Peng Q. Origin, selection, and succession of coastal intertidal zone-derived bacterial communities associated with the degradation of various lignocellulose substrates. Microb Ecol. 2023;86(3):1589–1603.
57.
Levy-Booth DJ, Hashimi A, Roccor R, Liu L-Y, Renneckar S, Eltis LD, Mohn WW. Genomics and metatranscriptomics of biogeochemical cycling and degradation of lignin-derived aromatic compounds in thermal swamp sediment. ISME J. 2021;15(3):879–893.
58.
Ferrer A, Heath KD, Canam T, Flores HD, Dalling JW. Contribution of fungal and invertebrate communities to wood decay in tropical terrestrial and aquatic habitats. Ecology. 2020;101(9):Article e03097.
59.
Chen J, Luo Y, García-Palacios P, Cao J, Dacal M, Zhou X, Li J, Xia J, Niu S, Yang H, et al.Differential responses of carbon-degrading enzyme activities to warming: Implications for soil respiration. Glob Chang Biol. 2018;24(10):4816–4826.
60.
Woo HL, Hazen TC, Simmons BA, DeAngelis KM. Enzyme activities of aerobic lignocellulolytic bacteria isolated from wet tropical forest soils. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2014;37(1):60–67.
61.
Wilhelm RC, Singh R, Eltis LD, Mohn WW. Bacterial contributions to delignification and lignocellulose degradation in forest soils with metagenomic and quantitative stable isotope probing. ISME J. 2019;13(2):413–429.
62.
Janvier M, Grimont PA. The genus Methylophaga, a new line of descent within phylogenetic branch gamma of Proteobacteria. Res Microbiol. 1995;146(7):543–550.
63.
Fujii K, Nakada Y, Umezawa K, Yoshida M, Shibata M, Hayakawa C, Inagaki Y, Kosaki T, Hangs R. A comparison of lignin-degrading enzyme activities in forest floor layers across a global climatic gradient. Soil Ecol Lett. 2020;2(4):281–294.
64.
Boyle CD, Kropp BR, Reid ID. Solubilization and mineralization of lignin by white rot fungi. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992;58(10):3217–3224.
65.
Chio C, Sain M, Qin W. Lignin utilization: A review of lignin depolymerization from various aspects. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2019;107:232–249.
66.
Angst G, Mueller KE, Nierop KGJ, Simpson MJ. Plant- or microbial-derived? A review on the molecular composition of stabilized soil organic matter. Soil Biol Biochem. 2021;156:Article 108189.
67.
Su J, Li D, Chen Q, Li M, Su L, Luo T, Liang D, Lai G, Shuai O, Jiao C, et al.Anti-breast cancer enhancement of a polysaccharide from spore of Ganoderma lucidum with paclitaxel: Suppression on tumor metabolism with gut microbiota reshaping. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:Article 3099.
68.
Peng Q, Zhao C, Wang X, Cheng K, Wang C, Xu X, Lin L. Modeling bacterial interactions uncovers the importance of outliers in the coastal lignin-degrading consortium. Nat Commun. 2025;16(1):Article 639.
69.
Yu T, Wu W, Liang W, Wang Y, Hou J, Chen Y, Elvert M, Hinrichs K-U, Wang F. Anaerobic degradation of organic carbon supports uncultured microbial populations in estuarine sediments. Microbiome. 2023;11(1):Article 81.
70.
Yu T, Hu H, Zeng X, Wang Y, Pan D, Deng L, Liang L, Hou J, Wang F. Widespread Bathyarchaeia encode a novel methyltransferase utilizing lignin-derived aromatics. mLife. 2023;2(3):272–282.
71.
Ley Y, Cheng X-Y, Ying Z-Y, Zhou N-Y, Xu Y. Characterization of two marine lignin-degrading consortia and the potential microbial lignin degradation network in nearshore regions. Microbiol Spectr. 2023;11(3):Article e0442422.
72.
Dong X, Zhang C, Peng Y, Zhang H, Shi L, Wei G, Hubert CRJ, Wang Y, Greening C. Phylogenetically and catabolically diverse diazotrophs reside in deep-sea cold seep sediments. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):Article 4885.
73.
Sumranwanich T, Amosu E, Chankhamhaengdecha S, Phetruen T, Loktumraks W, Ounjai P, Harnvoravongchai P. Evaluating lignin degradation under limited oxygen conditions by bacterial isolates from forest soil. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):Article 13350.
74.
Bhattarai S, Cassarini C, Rene ER, Kummel S, Esposito G, Lens P. Enrichment of ANME-2 dominated anaerobic oxidation of methane coupled to sulfate reduction consortia from cold seep sediment (Ginsburg Mud Volcano, Gulf of Cadiz) in a membrane bioreactor. In: Performance assessment and enrichment of anaerobic methane oxidizing microbial communities from marine sediments in bioreactors. London (UK): CRC Press; 2018. p. 369–378. .
75.
Tuomela M, Vikman M, Hatakka A, Itävaara M. Biodegradation of lignin in a compost environment: A review. Bioresour Technol. 2000;72(2):169–183.
76.
Thevenot M, Dignac M-F, Rumpel C. Fate of lignins in soils: A review. Soil Biol Biochem. 2010;42(8):1200–1211.
77.
Hedges JI, Mann DC. The characterization of plant tissues by their lignin oxidation products. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 1979;43(11):1803–1807.
78.
Goñi MA, Montgomery S. Alkaline CuO oxidation with a microwave digestion system: Lignin analyses of geochemical samples. Anal Chem. 2000;72(14):3116–3121.
79.
Yu H, Wu Y, Zhang J, Deng B, Zhu Z. Impact of extreme drought and the Three Gorges Dam on transport of particulate terrestrial organic carbon in the Changjiang (Yangtze), River. J Geophys Res Earth. 2011;116(F4):Article 2011JF002012.
80.
Li X, Yao H, Yu Y, Cao Y, Tang C. Greenhouse gases in an urban river: Trend, isotopic evidence for underlying processes, and the impact of in-river structures. J Hydrol. 2020;591:Article 125290.
81.
Xu M, Deng J, Xu K, Zhu T, Han L, Yan Y, Yao D, Deng H, Wang D, Sun Y, et al.In-depth serum proteomics reveals biomarkers of psoriasis severity and response to traditional Chinese medicine. Theranostics. 2019;9(9):2475–2488.
82.
Yang N, Tian C, Lv Y, Hou J, Yang Z, Xiao X, Zhang Y. Novel primers for 16S rRNA gene-based archaeal and bacterial community analysis in oceanic trench sediments. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2022;106(7):2795–2809.
83.
Wang P, Li J, Luo X, Ahmad M, Duan L, Yin L, Fang B, Li S, Yang Y, Jiang L, et al.Biogeographical distributions of nitrogen-cycling functional genes in a subtropical estuary. Funct Ecol. 2022;36(1):187–201.
84.
Martin M. CUTADAPT removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 2011;17(1):10–12.
85.
Edgar RC. UNOISE2: improved error-correction for Illumina 16S and ITS amplicon sequencing. bioRxiv. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1101/081257
86.
Bokulich NA, Kaehler BD, Rideout JR, Dillon M, Bolyen E, Knight R, Huttley GA, Gregory Caporaso J. Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2’s q2-feature-classifier plugin. Microbiome. 2018;6(1):Article 90.
87.
Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, Alexander H, Alm EJ, Arumugam M, Asnicar F, et al.Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(8):852–857.
88.
Luo X, Wang P, Li J, Ahmad M, Duan L, Yin L, Deng Q, Fang B, Li S, Li W. Viral community-wide auxiliary metabolic genes differ by lifestyles, habitats, and hosts. Microbiome. 2022;10(1):Article 190.
89.
Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. Fastp: An ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(17):i884–i890.
90.
Nurk S, Meleshko D, Korobeynikov A, Pevzner PA. metaSPAdes: A new versatile metagenomic assembler. Genome Res. 2017;27(5):824–834.
91.
Hyatt D, Chen G-L, LoCascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. Prodigal: Prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11(1):Article 119.
92.
Deng Z, Münch PC, Mreches R, McHardy AC. Rapid and accurate identification of ribosomal RNA sequences via deep learning. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50(10):Article e60.
93.
Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9(4):357–359.
94.
Uritskiy GV, DiRuggiero J, Taylor J. MetaWRAP—A flexible pipeline for genome-resolved metagenomic data analysis. Microbiome. 2018;6(1):Article 158.
95.
Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: Assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25(7):1043–1055.
96.
Seemann T. Prokka: Rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(14):2068–2069.
97.
Li J, Sun W, Cao Y, Wu J, Duan L, Zhang M, Luo X, Deng Q, Peng Z, Mou X, et al.Increased temperature enhances microbial-mediated lignin decomposition in river sediment. Microbiome. 2025;13(1):Article 89.
98.
Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using diamond. Nat Methods. 2015;12(1):59–60.
99.
Zhu T, Zhu Y, Xuan Y, Gao H, Cai X, Piersma SR, Pham TV, Schelfhorst T, Haas RRGD, Bijnsdorp IV, et al.DPHL: A DIA pan-human protein mass spectrometry library for robust biomarker discovery. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2020;18(2):104–119.
100.
Lou R, Shui W. Acquisition and analysis of DIA-based proteomic data: A comprehensive survey in 2023. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2024;23(2):Article 100712.
101.
Ren Y, Yu G, Shi C, Liu L, Guo Q, Han C, Zhang D, Zhang L, Liu B, Gao H, et al.Majorbio Cloud: A one-stop, comprehensive bioinformatic platform for multiomics analyses. iMeta. 2022;1(2):Article e12.
102.
Asnicar F, Thomas AM, Beghini F, Mengoni C, Manara S, Manghi P, Zhu Q, Bolzan M, Cumbo F, May U, et al.Precise phylogenetic analysis of microbial isolates and genomes from metagenomes using PhyloPhlAn 3.0. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):Article 2500.
103.
Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life v2: Online annotation and display of phylogenetic trees made easy. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:W475–W478.
Year 2025 volume 8 Issue 8
PDF
10
5
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.34133/research.0848
  • Receive Date:2025-05-24
  • Online Date:2026-11-01
  • Published:2025-08-20
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-05-24
  • Revised:2025-07-19
  • Accepted:2025-07-29
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China(42494884)
Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation, China(2025A1515010959)
Affiliations
    1Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou), Guangzhou 511458, China.
    2School of Ecology, Environmental, and Resources, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.
    3School of Pharmacy, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518055, China.
    4South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510301, China.
    5State Key Laboratory of Estuarine and Coastal Research East China Normal University, Shanghai 200662, China.
    6Key Laboratory of Marine Genetic Resources, Third Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Xiamen 361005, China.

Corresponding:

* Address correspondence to: (S.Z.);
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/research/EN/10.34133/research.0848
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT