收藏切换
Confinement Effect and Hydrogen Species Modulation toward Enhanced Electrochemical CO2 Reduction to Ethanol
收藏切换
PDF
Yuting Zhu1, Jiamin Zhu1, Huizhi Li1, Shuhui Li1, Yue Zhai1, Shao-Wen Xu1, Shanshan Wu1, Yuan Chen1, Yafu Wang2, Rui Ren2, Li An1, *, Jiangwei Zhang2, *, Pinxian Xi1, *, Chun-Hua Yan1, 3
Research. Vol 8 Article ID 0796
Less
收藏切换
Research. Vol 8 Article ID 0796
• Research Article •
Confinement Effect and Hydrogen Species Modulation toward Enhanced Electrochemical CO2 Reduction to Ethanol
Full
Yuting Zhu1, Jiamin Zhu1, Huizhi Li1, Shuhui Li1, Yue Zhai1, Shao-Wen Xu1, Shanshan Wu1, Yuan Chen1, Yafu Wang2, Rui Ren2, Li An1, *, Jiangwei Zhang2, *, Pinxian Xi1, *, Chun-Hua Yan1, 3
Affiliations
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Applied Organic Chemistry, Frontiers Science Center for Rare Isotopes, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
  • 2College of Energy Material and Chemistry; Inner Mongolia Advanced Research Institute; Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Low Carbon Catalysis; Inner Mongolia University Hohhot 010021, China
  • 3Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Rare Earth Materials Chemistry and Applications, PKU-HKU Joint Laboratory in Rare Earth Materials and Bioinorganic Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, China
Published: 2025-07-20 doi: 10.34133/research.0796
Outline
收藏切换

The protonation process of adsorbed *CO intermediates has been widely recognized as a critical determinant governing product selectivity in electrocatalytic carbon dioxide reduction reaction (eCO2RR). However, the active hydrogen species and mechanism of *CO protonation in acid eCO2RR remain ambiguous. Particularly, the involvement of H+ in *CO hydrogenation is still under debate. Here, we developed a CuCl-mediated synthesis strategy integrated with rare-earth doping electronic structure engineering, which enriches intermediates and promotes adsorbed hydrogen (*H) participation in reactions, respectively. For the first time, differential electrochemical mass spectrometry (DEMS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) were employed to clarify the participation of hydrogen species in liquid and gaseous eCO2RR products, with isotope labeling utilized to distinguish the distribution of H+ and *H in the products. Experimental verification confirmed that in acidic electrolytes, the ethylene pathway was dominated by H+ hydrogenation, whereas the ethanol pathway incorporated contributions from both H+ and *H. Upon yttrium (Y) doping into Cu2O/CuCl, interfacial water activation was markedly enhanced, thereby enabling the provision of supplementary *H for catalytic engagement. Notably, our Y-Cu2O/CuCl catalyst achieves a remarkable 65.7% Faradaic efficiency for ethanol with exceptional 65-h stability at 200 mA cm−1. This work provides new evidence for H+ participation in acid eCO2RR, emphasizing the critical role of H2O activation degree in selectivity regulation, and thus offering novel insights for designing efficient acid eCO2RR catalysts.

Yuting Zhu, Jiamin Zhu, Huizhi Li, Shuhui Li, Yue Zhai, Shao-Wen Xu, Shanshan Wu, Yuan Chen, Yafu Wang, Rui Ren, Li An, Jiangwei Zhang, Pinxian Xi, Chun-Hua Yan. Confinement Effect and Hydrogen Species Modulation toward Enhanced Electrochemical CO2 Reduction to Ethanol[J]. Research, 2025 , 8 (7) : 0796 - . DOI: 10.34133/research.0796
Electrocatalytic carbon dioxide reduction reaction (ECO2RR) is a promising strategy for converting greenhouse gases into high-value chemicals, powered by renewable energy sources such as wind and solar, which reduces dependence on fossil fuels and enables artificial regulation of the carbon cycle [1–3]. Ethanol, producible via CO2 electrolysis, is in focus due to its high energy density and stable global demand, but the selectivity of ethanol still need to be enhanced for industrial application [4,5]. Understanding the pathway of eCO2RR is particularly important for regulating the product selectivity [6]. For typical multi-carbon products, CO2 is first reduced into *CO intermediates with electron transfer. Subsequently, *CO undergoes C–C coupling and a series of hydrogenations with gaining electrons, leading to eCO2RR products [7–9]. Various active hydrogen species play different roles in regulating product selectivity and activity of various products. In acidic eCO2RR hydrocarbons, there are 2 sources of hydrogen, which were from hydrogen ions in solution and water, respectively [10,11]. As for the first one, hydrogen ions will be involved in the hydrogenation process directly, while water should first be electrically reduced to *H (H2O + e− → *H + OH−), which was demonstrated to be related to the degree of water activation [12]. Therefore, modulating the competitive interplay between *H and proton transfer during *CO hydrogenation is pivotal for tailoring the product selectivity in the eCO2RR.
Copper-based catalysts are a research hotspot due to their appropriate *CO binding affinity and excellent capability for producing multi-carbon products [13–15]. The confinement effect inherent in the porous architecture of materials has been demonstrated to effectively enrich reaction intermediates, thereby facilitating C–C coupling [16,17]. Rare earth elements are strategically employed to modulate oxygen-involving reaction pathways by their exceptional oxygen affinity [18,19]. Rational morphological engineering of Cu2O combined with rare-earth element doping is anticipated to enable enhanced activity and durability in the CO2RR.
Herein, we proposed a CuCl-mediated synthesis strategy to adjust particle size and an yttrium doping approach to promote *H participation in reactions, which modulates the active hydrogen species and improves the selectivity of ethanol. Differential electrochemical mass spectrometry (DEMS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) were employed for the first time to analyze the active hydrogen species in liquid and gas products. The preferential occurrence of the ethanol pathway is attributed to its demand for elevated adsorbed hydrogen (*H) coverage, primarily supplied through water activation. The design of yttrium-doped Cu2O/CuCl (Y-Cu2O/CuCl) catalyst was implemented to address this issue. First, by modulating the anions in the precursor salts during the synthesis, the particle size of the catalyst was increased to promote the enrichment of intermediates and inhibit the hydrogen precipitation reaction (HER). The doping of yttrium promotes water activation and increases the ratio of K·H2O, which makes our Y-Cu2O/CuCl exhibit a remarkable Faradaic efficiency of 65.33% for ethanol at 200 mA cm−1 with exceptional sustained stability exceeding 65 h.
In this work, we developed a CuCl-mediated soft-template strategy to synthesize structurally controlled Cu2O/CuCl nanoparticles (Fig. 1A). Specifically, ammonia was introduced into copper chloride solution to form a 6-coordinated [Cu(NH3)4(H2O)]2+ complex, as verified by ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy (Fig. S1), revealing a characteristic absorption peak at 615 nm [20,21]. Subsequent reduction with ascorbic acid produced a white nantokite phase of CuCl precipitation (PDF#1-759; Fig. S2). This CuCl precipitation transformed into the thermodynamically stable cuprite phase of Cu2O (PDF#1-1142; Fig. S3) after 30 min, generating the Cu2O/CuCl heterojunction structure designated as Cu2O/CuCl. When copper chloride was substituted with copper acetate, the [Cu(NH3)4(H2O)]2+ complex was similarly detected at 615 nm (Fig. S4), yet there was no CuCl precipitation that could be observed. Subsequently, the yellow Cu2O precipitation with nantokite phase (PDF#1-759; Fig. S5) was reduced directly by ascorbic acid. Furthermore, the Cu2O/CuCl heterojunction structure was confirmed by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR). The distinct single-electron signal in the EPR spectrum demonstrated the incomplete replacement of CuCl by Cu2O (Fig. S6) [22]. As shown in Fig. 1B and C, x-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns revealed a marked narrowing of the full width at half maximum (FWHM) for the Cu2O (111) diffraction peak. Lorentzian fitting of XRD patterns for Cu2O and Cu2O/CuCl demonstrated FWHM values of 2.12 and 0.79, respectively (Fig. S7). According to Scherrer’s equation, this difference indicates a larger crystallite size in the Cu2O/CuCl composite.
To observe the effect of precursor salt on the size of nanoparticles, the morphology of the prepared samples was analyzed by scanning electron microscope (SEM). Both Cu2O and Cu2O/CuCl have spherical morphologies with uniform size distribution (Figs. S8 and S9). The diameters of Cu2O and Cu2O/CuCl particles were statistically analyzed using 30 randomly selected particles. A 4-fold diameter increase in Cu2O/CuCl (434.52 ± 7.35 nm; Fig. 1D) compared to that of pristine Cu2O (102.93 ± 6.42 nm; Fig. 1E) was demonstrated. This marked dimensional expansion can be attributed to the CuCl intermediate phase acting as a kinetic modulator, effectively retarding grain assemblage processes through surface coordination mechanisms.
Further structural characterization was made by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDX), and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). As shown in Fig. 1G and H, Cu2O and Cu2O/CuCl display the porous architecture, with Cu2O/CuCl exhibiting markedly enlarged nanoparticle dimensions. The interfacial lattice spacings of 0.243 and 0.318 nm in high-resolution TEM images can be corresponded to the Cu2O (111) plane and CuCl (111) plane, respectively, thereby validating the heterojunction interface formation (Fig. 1F). In contrast, only Cu2O (111) plane was detected in Cu2O (Fig. S10). As shown in EDX mapping (Fig. S11), Cu, Cl, and O exhibits homogeneous elemental distribution. Furthermore, XPS was employed to probe the surface electronic structure and chemical states of the catalysts. High-resolution XPS spectra of Cu 2p (Figs. S12 to S14) indicated predominant [Cu0, Cu+] and Cu2+ surface species, with the Cu2+/[Cu0, Cu+] ratio elevated in Cu2O/CuCl, due to the fact that Cl− is a weak-field ligand and its interaction with the 3d orbitals of Cu is relatively weak, leading to easier loss of electrons from Cu. In contrast, the strong-field ligand O2−, with its high electronegativity, stabilizes Cu+ in a low-spin configuration. Mott–Schottky measurements were employed to probe the energy band structure, which further revealed conduction band positions of −0.71 V versus Ag/AgCl and −0.74 V versus Ag/AgCl for Cu2O and Cu2O/CuCl (Fig. S15), respectively. This fact suggests that enhanced reducibility in the heterostructure contributes to better performance in CO2RR.
The electrocatalytic performance of Cu2O and Cu2O/CuCl was evaluated in 0.5 M K2SO4 +H2SO4 (pH 3) using a flow cell. Superior C2+ Faradaic efficiency for Cu2O/CuCl (65.78% at −200 mA cm-2; Fig. S16) compared to Cu2O (58.89%) (Fig. 1I) was demonstrated. Meanwhile, the Faraday efficiency of H2 was obviously suppressed (Fig. S17). A strong positive correlation between nanoparticles size and C2+ selectivity was established, indicating that enlarged nanoparticle size facilitates intermediate enrichment.
Rare earth elements have been shown to modulate oxygen species intermediates in electrocatalytic processes [23], and we hope to exploit the inherent oxyphilicity of rare earth elements to stabilize oxygen-containing intermediates in eCO2RR. Y3+ was prioritized as the dopant of choice due to its compatible ionic radius (0.90 Å versus Cu+: 0.77 Å), which promotes localized lattice strain and subsequent exposure of unsaturated coordination sites. Yttrium (3%) was doped into the Cu2O/CuCl heterostructure for modulation, named Y-Cu2O/CuCl. As shown in Fig. 2A, XRD revealed that the Y-doped composite retained the primary cuprite phase (Cu2O, PDF:1-1142), confirming structural stability post-doping. SEM imaging exhibited uniformly distributed spherical architectures of Y-Cu2O/CuCl, with statistical analysis yielding an average diameter of 357.38 ± 5.43 nm (Fig. S18), indicating negligible particle size variation upon Y introduction. TEM images of Y-Cu2O/CuCl showed an abundant porous structure. Significantly, the existence of Cu2O (111) and CuCl (111) crystal planes within the composite material were further identified through high-resolution TEM (HRTEM), with the existence of heterojunction interfaces in Y-Cu2O/CuCl being directly confirmed by this observation (Fig. S19). Aberration-corrected scanning TEM (AC-STEM) in high-angle annular dark-field (HAADF) mode further exhibited the widespread presence of porous channels in Y-Cu2O/CuCl (Fig. S20). HAADF image revealed Y atoms (Z = 39) as localized bright spots due to their higher atomic number than Cu (Z = 29), consistent with substitutional doping at Cu lattice sites (Fig. 2B-B1 and Fig. 2B-B2). Figure 2B-B3 displays the electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) spectrum of Y-Cu2O/CuCl, demonstrating Y doping incorporation into the Cu2O lattice. Simultaneously, EDX mapping indicated the uniform distribution of Cu, Cl, O, and Y elements in Y-Cu2O/CuCl (Fig. 2B-B4). The actual Y content in Y-Cu2O/CuCl was analyzed by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES), with results revealing an actual Y mass content of 0.115% in the composite (Table S1).
XPS was employed to interrogate the surface chemical states of Y-Cu2O/CuCl. High-resolution XPS spectra of Cu 2p3/2 showed dominant surface Cu2+ species, evidenced by satellite peaks at 940 to 945 eV (Fig. 2C) [24]. The increased Cu2+/[Cu0, Cu+] ratio is observed upon Y doping. The Cu 2p peak of Y-Cu2O/CuCl is also observed to be positively shifted by 0.2 eV, relative to Cu2O/CuCl. It is attributed to the decrease in the copper center charge density in the Cu–O–Y unit due to the inherent oxygenophilicity of Y attracting electrons through the oxygen bridge. To resolve Cu+ contributions, Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) was employed, detecting a characteristic Cu+ peak at 917 eV (Fig. 2D). Concurrently, the Y 3d5/2 peak at 156.5 to 157.5 eV confirmed Y3+ incorporation into the lattice, excluding metallic Y (155.3 eV) (Fig. S21).
The coordination environment and local electronic structure were investigated synergistically using x-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) and extended x-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS). The pre-edge peak at 8,983 eV, which corresponds to the 1s → 3d transition accompanied by ligand-to-metal charge transfer, was analyzed to probe the coordination structure of Cu sites in XANES spectra (Fig. 2E) [25,26]. Notably, XANES showed that Y-Cu2O/CuCl exhibited a higher oxidation state and a highly disordered local structure compared to the pristine material. EXAFS spectra further resolved the fine coordination environment and geometric interfacial configuration of Cu (Fig. 2F). Fourier-transform EXAFS spectra of Y-Cu2O/CuCl exhibited 2 distinct radial distribution peaks at 1.50 and 2.61 Å, assigned to Cu–O and Cu–(O)–Cu scattering paths, respectively [27]. The Cu–O bond length is shortened from the original 1.56 to 1.50 Å, which proves that the yttrium-induced modification leads to the enhancement of Cu–O bond covalency through localized electronic structure modulation.
The coordination environment was further intuitively confirmed by wavelet transform (WT) analysis of the Cu K-edge, where strong intensity maxima were observed (Fig. 2G and H). Notably, the high-intensity region at 1.6 Å was attributed to interfacial Cu–O coordination.
The eCO2RR performance of Y-Cu2O/CuCl and Cu2O/CuCl was systematically evaluated in a flow-cell configuration using 0.5 M K2SO4 + H2SO4 (pH 3) electrolyte under current densities of −50 to −250 mA cm−2. Product distribution showed that Y-Cu2O/CuCl primarily generated multicarbon compounds (ethylene, ethanol, and propanol) with minor quantities of methane, carbon monoxide, and formic acid. Notably, the Y-Cu2O/CuCl catalyst achieved a peak multicarbon Faradaic efficiency of 80.87 ± 0.07% at −200 mA cm−2 (Fig. 3A), outperforming the undoped Cu2O/CuCl, which had the highest Faraday efficiency of 66.43 ± 0.03% at a current density of −200 mA cm−2 (Fig. 3B). Product distribution demonstrated a distinct selectivity shift induced by Y doping: Y-Cu2O/CuCl exhibited 65.33 ± 11.07% ethanol selectivity at −200 mA cm−2, concurrently suppressing ethylene formation compared to the pristine Cu2O/CuCl (Fig. 3C). Ethanol/ethylene ratio of Cu2O/CuCl and Y-Cu2O/CuCl can clearly reveal this (Fig. S18). In addition, utilizing an acidic system minimizes carbonate formation and therefore facilitates overcoming the carbon utilization limitations observed in neutral and alkaline solutions. When the flow rate of carbon dioxide was reduced from 25 standard cubic centimeters per minute (sccm) to 5 sccm, the single-pass carbon efficiency (SPCE) of all products on Y-Cu2O/CuCl increased from 9.34% to 60.05% at −200 mA cm−2, whereas the SPCE of the C2+ products could reach 33.89% at 5 sccm (Fig. 3D). This is higher than the reported systems in alkaline/neutral electrolytes and highlights the advantage of the catalytic system. To elucidate the origin of enhanced activity, cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves were measured at scan rates of 10 to 50 mV s−1 within the non-Faradaic potential region. Y-Cu2O/CuCl exhibited a 2.22-fold enhancement in double-layer capacitance compared to the pristine Cu2O/CuCl, directly evidencing its expanded electrochemically active surface area (Fig. S22). To further understand the electrochemical behavior of Y-Cu2O/CuCl, in situ electrochemical impedance spectroscopy was performed. As shown in Fig. S23, the diameter of the semicircle in the mid-frequency region represents the charge transfer resistance [28], which decreased for all catalysts as the potential increased from OCP to −0.9 V versus reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE), indicating that the charge transfer resistance accelerated with the application of the potential. The spectrum of Y-Cu2O/CuCl has the smallest intercept with the horizontal axis, indicating that Y-Cu2O/CuCl has the smallest contact resistance. As evidenced above, the Y-doped Cu2O/CuCl modulation strategy has been demonstrated to effectively promote CO₂ electroreduction to ethanol (Fig. 3F). Long-term stability tests revealed that Y-Cu2O/CuCl maintained 60 h of continuous electrolysis at −200 mA cm−2 (Fig. 3G). Compared with published catalysts [29–36], Y-Cu2O/CuCl was the best catalyst in terms of ethanol selectivity and stability (Fig. 3E and Table S2).
Typically, it was widely a consensus that catalysts will undergo irreversible surface remodeling before eCO2RR occurs [37,38]. The evolution of redox peaks in CV monitors surface restructuring of electrode materials during potential cycling. CV tests were carried out on our catalysts, which exhibited distinct oxidation and reduction peaks (Fig. S24). The oxidation peak located at about −0.2 V versus RHE is the reduction of Cu+ to Cu0. The reduction peak of Y-Cu2O/CuCl shifted somewhat to the left, which proves that Cu+ in Y-Cu2O/CuCl is more difficult to reduce.
To investigate the reason for the enhancement of ethanol selectivity by Y-Cu2O/CuCl, the electrochemical surface structure was investigated by in situ surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS). Three peaks at 442, 528, and 621 cm−1 were observed in the lower energy region under open-circuit potential (OCP) conditions, corresponding to the vibrational signatures of Cu2O (Fig. S25) [39]. However, these characteristic peaks were completely suppressed when the Cu2O/CuCl electrode was polarized to −0.4 V versus RHE, suggesting surface reduction of Cu+ to metallic Cu0. In contrast, weak but persistent Cu2O signals were detected in Y-Cu2O/CuCl even at −0.8 V versus RHE, demonstrating Y-dopped stabilization of Cu+ species against electrochemical reduction. Additionally, the crystalline phase of Y-Cu2O/CuCl after electrolysis was confirmed by XRD, revealing that the main component remains Cu2O (Fig. S26).
Y-Cu2O/CuCl was dissolved for different times of electrolysis, and the Cl− content in the material was monitored by ion chromatography (IC) after different times of electrolysis, and the Cl− content in Y-Cu2O/CuCl remained invariant throughout prolonged operation (>60 min), demonstrating robust halogen retention post-electrochemical activation (Fig. S27).
The mass evolution of electrodes during CO2RR was quantitatively monitored using electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance coupled with CV [40,41]. Notably, Y-Cu2O/CuCl required 5 consecutive CV cycles to achieve mass equilibration, whereas pristine Cu2O/CuCl stabilized within 3 cycles, indicating prolonged structural reconstitution in Y-Cu2O/CuCl (Fig. S28).
The changes in the mass of the catalyst stabilized after reconstruction was monitored. When taking the 9th and 10th circles as examples, it was found that the mass of the Cu2O/CuCl electrode decreased with the increase of the applied voltage in the CV, indicating that the change in the mass of the electrode itself was greater than the change in the mass of the intermediates (Fig. 4A). Conversely, the Y-Cu2O/CuCl electrode exhibited a marked mass increase when voltages exceeding the overpotential were applied. This mass gain surpassed that observed in the Cu2O/CuCl electrode. The larger mass variation in reaction intermediates compared to the Cu2O/CuCl system is demonstrated in Fig. 4B. This inversion in mass evolution trends indicates that Y-Cu2O/CuCl enhanced intermediate adsorption capacity in CO2RR.
To further clarify the intermediate changes during eCO2RR, attenuated total reflection surface-enhanced infrared absorption spectroscopy (ATR-SEIRAS). was systematically conducted across the potential range of 0 to −1.4 V versus RHE. Firstly, Y-Cu2O/CuCl and Cu2O/CuCl exhibited a characteristic vibrational mode at about 1,250 cm−1, assigned to the *CH–COH intermediate (Fig. 4C and D) [42]. Compared with Cu2O/CuCl, a marked blue shift in the *CH–COH peak wavenumber can be observed for Y-Cu2O/CuCl, which results from Y doping that weakens the Cu–C bond in *CH–COH through an electron injection effect, indirectly strengthening the C–H bond and resulting in an increase in its vibrational frequency.
Furthermore, *CO adsorption signatures near 2,100 cm−1 were detected in both catalytic systems. Comparative analysis of peak positions revealed that the CO stretching frequency of Cu2O/CuCl exceeded that of the Y-doped counterpart, demonstrating a Y-induced redshift (Fig. 4E). This vibrational frequency shift indicates strengthened interactions between *CO intermediates and Y- Cu2O/CuCl catalytic sites.
CO intermediate protonation has been demonstrated by both experimental and computational studies to critically govern multicarbon product formation. However, the origin of protons for CO activation and detailed protonation pathways are still debated. Consequently, elucidating proton transfer in acidic CO2RR systems becomes essential, particularly for clarifying whether direct proton participation occurs.
The local pH at the electrode interface was evaluated using a rotating ring-disk electrode (RRDE) configuration. Initially, the ring disk was coated with iridium-plated iridium by electrodeposition. A standard curve was established based on the OCP differences at varying pH levels [43]. Subsequently, linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) was employed to monitor potential shifts of the pH-sensitive ring electrode, enabling the dynamic tracking of superficial proton flux during CO2RR (Fig. S29). It is found that Cu2O/CuCl consumes more protons in CO2RR compared to Y-Cu2O/CuCl. Therefore, we suggest that H+ is also involved in the hydrogenation process of CO2RR, indicating that water is not the only source of hydrogen for the process and that the involvement of H+ is more favorable for ethylene production.
To probe the hydrogen source in product formation, isotopic tracing was performed using H2SO4 + 0.5 M K2SO4 in D2O electrolyte to label deuterium in water. Initially, the gas-phase products were monitored via DEMS. Detection channels were configured to target mass/charge ratio (m/z) = 2, 3, and 4 for tracking H2, HD, and D2 species, respectively, with parallel monitoring of m/z = 28, 29, 30, 31, and 32 to detect ethylene isotopologues C2H4, C2H3D, C2H2D2, C2HD3, and C2D4. When H2SO4 + 0.5 M K2SO4 in H2O was used as the electrolyte, C2H4 with m/z = 28 was the major proportion, but a small amount of H2 with m/z = 2 (Fig. S30). Replacing the electrolyte as H2SO4 + 0.5 M K2SO4 + D2O, it was found that the C2H4 with m/z = 28 remained the predominant product, while a pronounced increase in D2 intensity (m/z = 4) was observed relative to HD (m/z = 3) and residual H2 (m/z = 2) (Fig. 4F and G). This isotopic distribution confirms preferential H+ utilization during ethylene hydrogenation, whereas the HER predominantly derives protons from water dissociation. It is hypothesized that H+ is transferred directly from the solvent water molecule to the oxygen terminus of the intermediate (e.g., the hydroxyl group of *CH–COH), leading to the deoxygenation of ethylene *CH–COH + H+ + e− → *C–CH + H2O [44].
Hydrogen sourcing in liquid products was further investigated through 1H NMR analysis of ethanol. As evidenced by Fig. S31, the methyl proton resonance at 0.94 parts per million (ppm) exhibited characteristic splitting patterns, which clearly demonstrates that H+ is involved in the hydrogenation process of ethanol. To probe hydrogen origin in ethanol products, D2O isotopic labeling was employed. Specifically, when H2SO4 + 0.5 M K2SO4 in H2O electrolyte was employed, a triplet signature was observed, following the n + 1 rule (Fig. 5A), whereas 0.5 M K2SO4 + H2SO4 in D2O electrolyte induced quadruplet splitting (Fig. 5B and C). This isotopic splitting pattern confirmed partial deuterium substitution at the methylene position, demonstrating dual hydrogen origins from both H+ and water-derived protons. It suggests that the reason for the increased selectivity of ethanol and decreased selectivity of ethylene is that ethanol requires more water activation to participate in hydrogenation.
The interfacial water structure is very important for the hydrogenation of CO2RR, which was probed through ATR-SEIRAS. O–H stretching vibrations within the 3,000 to 3,800 cm−1 spectral range (−0.1 to −1.3 V versus RHE) were deconvoluted via Lorentzian fitting. Three distinct bands were resolved at ~3,600, 3,450, and 3,250 cm−1, assigned to K·H2O complexes, weakly hydrogen-bonded water (w-HB-H2O), and strongly hydrogen-bonded water (s-HB-H2O) [45]. Figure 5D and E shows the distribution of the 3 water compositions of Cu2O/CuCl and Y-Cu2O/CuCl at different voltages. Comparing the K·H2O ratios of Cu2O/CuCl and Y-Cu2O/CuCl in eCO2RR (Figs. 5F and 6H and Tables S3 and S4), the K·H2O ratio of Y-Cu2O/CuCl was markedly higher than that of Cu2O/CuCl at different voltages. This K·H2O formation originates from K+ cation hydration, where K+ attracts oxygen atoms of water to coordinate surrounding water molecules. The markedly elevated K·H2O ratio in Y-doped systems indicates promoted interfacial water activation, facilitating *H transfer during CO2RR. The pathway mechanism for ethanol production generates *CH–COH to *CH–CHOH. H2O hydrogenation is kinetically and thermodynamically disadvantaged because the carbon end of the intermediate is spatially blocked by the surface structure. Therefore, the Y site in the catalyst Cu–O–Y unit can appropriately promote the activation of K·H2O, and the resulting *H can migrate rapidly to accelerate *CH–COH + *H → *CH–CHOH. This compositional shift correlates with enhanced ethanol selectivity, as activated water networks lower kinetic barriers for hydrogenation steps.
In summary, we reveal a CuCl-mediated synthesis strategy to regulate particle size by leveraging the confinement effect of porous spheres, thereby enhancing intermediate enrichment and improving multi-carbon product selectivity. Y doping in Cu2O/CuCl promotes interfacial water participation, modulating catalytically active hydrogen species to enhance ethanol selectivity. For the first time, DEMS and NMR spectroscopy were employed to analyze hydrogen species in liquid and gaseous eCO2RR products. We reveal that in acidic electrolytes, the ethylene pathway preferentially undergoes H+ hydrogenation, while both H+ and *H participate in ethanol formation. Y doping effectively activates interfacial water, supplying additional *H and achieving 65.7% ethanol selectivity with excellent stability. This work provides a new understanding of the design of ethanol catalysts in eCO2RR.
A triblock copolymer (P123, 2.448 g) was dissolved in 120 ml of deionized water, under continuous stirring at room temperature. Separately, 10 ml of 0.2 M copper (II) acetate solution was mixed with 1.5 ml of aqueous ammonia (25% to 28%) to form a homogeneous copper–ammonia complex solution. This solution was then added to the P123 mixture and stirred for 30 min. Subsequently, 20 ml of 0.6 M ascorbic acid solution was introduced and stirred vigorously for an additional 30 min. The resulting product was collected by centrifugation, followed by 5 washing cycles with deionized water and ethanol to remove impurities.
The procedure remained identical to that of Cu2O synthesis, except that 0.2 M copper (II) acetate was replaced with 0.2 M copper (II) chloride.
For yttrium incorporation, 0.006 mol of yttrium nitrate was added to 10 ml of 0.2 M copper(II) chloride solution prior to mixing with ammonia. The subsequent steps followed the same protocol as described for Cu2O/CuCl synthesis.
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China(22425105, 22221001, 22271124, 22471103, U22A20107 and 22201111)
1.
Huang JE, Li F, Ozden A, Sedighian Rasouli A, García De Arquer FP, Liu S, Zhang S, Luo M, Wang X, Lum Y, et al.CO2 electrolysis to multicarbon products in strong acid. Science. 2021;372(6546):1074–1078.
2.
Yang Y, Louisia S, Yu S, Jin J, Roh I, Chen C, Fonseca Guzman MV, Feijóo J, Chen PC, Wang H, et al.Operando studies reveal active Cu nanograins for CO2 electroreduction. Nature. 2023;614(7947):262–269.
3.
Wang M, Li Y, Jia J, Ghosh T, Luo P, Shen Y-J, Wang S, Zhang J, Xi S, Mi Z, et al.Tuning catalyst-support interactions enable steering of electrochemical CO2 reduction pathways. Sci Adv. 2025;11(14):Article edao5000.
4.
Kuang S, Su Y, Li M, Liu H, Chuai H, Chen X, Hensen EJM, Meyer TJ, Zhang S, Ma X. Asymmetrical electrohydrogenation of CO2 to ethanol with copper–gold heterojunctions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2023;120(4):Article e2214175120.
5.
Chen X, Jia S, Zhai J, Jiao J, Dong M, Xue C, Deng T, Cheng H, Xia Z, Chen C, et al.Multivalent Cu sites synergistically adjust carbonaceous intermediates adsorption for electrocatalytic ethanol production. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):7691.
6.
Birdja YY, Pérez-Gallent E, Figueiredo MC, Göttle AJ, Calle-Vallejo F, Koper MTM. Advances and challenges in understanding the electrocatalytic conversion of carbon dioxide to fuels. Nat Energy. 2019;4:732–745.
7.
Jiang Y, Huang L, Chen C, Zheng Y, Qiao S-Z. Catalyst–electrolyte interface engineering propelsprogress in acidic CO2 electroreduction. Energy Environ Sci. 2025;18:2025–2049.
8.
Ma G, Syzgantseva OA, Huang Y, Stoian D, Zhang J, Yang S, Luo W, Jiang M, Li S, Chen C, et al.A hydrophobic Cu/Cu2O sheet catalyst for selective electroreduction of CO to ethanol. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):501.
9.
Liu J, Li P, Jia S, Wang Y, Jing L, Liu Z, Zhang J, Qian Q, Kang X, Sun X, et al.Electrocatalytic CO2 hydrogenation to C2+ alcohols catalysed by Pr–Cu oxide heterointerfaces. Nat Synth. 2025.
10.
Zhang J, Zhang C, Wang M, Mao Y, Wu B, Yang Q, Wang B, Mi Z, Zhang M, Ling N, et al.Isotopic labelling of water reveals the hydrogen transfer route in electrochemical CO2 reduction. Nat Chem. 2025;17(3):334–343.
11.
Lin Y, Wang T, Zhang L, Zhang G, Li L, Chang Q, Pang Z, Gao H, Huang K, Zhang P, et al.Tunable CO2 electroreduction to ethanol and ethylene with controllable interfacial wettability. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):3575.
12.
Feng J, Zhang L, Liu S, Xu L, Ma X, Tan X, Wu L, Qian Q, Wu T, Zhang J, et al.Modulating adsorbed hydrogen drives electrochemical CO2-to-C2 products. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):4615.
13.
Herzog A, Bergmann A, Jeon HS, Timoshenko J, Kühl S, Rettenmaier C, Lopez Luna M, Haase FT, Roldan Cuenya BR. Operando investigation of Ag-decorated Cu2O nanocube catalysts with enhanced CO2 electroreduction toward liquid products. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2021;60(13):7426–7435.
14.
Arán-Ais RM, Scholten F, Kunze S, Rizo R, Roldan CB. The role of in situ generated morphological motifs and Cu(i) species in C2+ product selectivity during CO2 pulsed electroreduction. Nat Energy. 2020;5:317–325.
15.
Maniam KK, Maniam M, Diaz LA, Kukreja HK, Papadopoulos AI, Kumar V, Seferlis P, Paul S. Progress in electrodeposited copper catalysts for CO2 conversion to valuable products. Processes. 2023;11(4):1148.
16.
Pan F, Duan X, Fang L, Li H, Xu Z, Wang Y, Wang T, Li T, Duan Z, Chen K-J. Long-range confinement-driven enrichment of surface oxygen-relevant species promotes C−C electrocoupling in CO2 reduction. Adv Energy Mater. 2024;14(7):2303118.
17.
Xiao Y, Wang M, Yang H, Qiu H, Lu H, da Y, Chen G, Jiang T, Fu W, Hu B, et al.Multi-shell copper catalysts for selective electroreduction of CO2 to multicarbon chemicals. Adv Energy Mater. 2024;14(1):2302556.
18.
Yang Z, Ji D, Li Z, He Z, Hu Y, Yin J, Hou Y, Xi P, Yan CH. CeO2/CuS nanoplates electroreduce CO2 to ethanol with stabilized Cu+ species. Small. 2023;19(40):2303099.
19.
Wang X, Wang J, Wang P, Li L, Zhang X, Sun D, Li Y, Tang Y, Wang Y, Fu G. Engineering 3d–2p–4f gradient orbital coupling to enhance electrocatalytic oxygen reduction. Adv Mater. 2022;34(42):2206540.
20.
Guspita D, Ulianas A. Optimization of complex NH3 with Cu2+ ions to determine levels of ammonia by UV-Vis spectrophotometer. J Phys Conf Ser. 2020;1481:Article 012040.
21.
Venig SB, Chernova RK, Doronin SY, Soldatenko EM, Selifonova EI, Sergantov VG, Zaharevich AM, Shapoval OG. Synthesis, properties and antibacterial activity of the composites based on glauconite. BioNanoSci. 2017;7:659–665.
22.
Yordanov ND, Shopov D. EPR spectra of mixed-ligand copper(II) complexes in solution. J Inorg Nucl Chem. 1976;38(1):137–140.
23.
Shen W, Zheng Y, Hu Y, Jin J, Hou Y, Zhang N, An L, Xi P, Yan CH. Rare-earth-modified NiS2 improves OH coverage for an industrial alkaline water electrolyzer. J Am Chem Soc. 2024;146(8):5324–5332.
24.
Hong S, Abbas HG, Jang K, Patra KK, Kim B, Choi B, Song H, Lee KS, Choi PP, Ringe S, et al.Tuning the C1 /C2 selectivity of electrochemical CO2 reduction on Cu–CeO2 nanorods by oxidation state control. Adv Mater. 2023;35(8):2208996.
25.
Liu X, Cui S, Sun Z, Ren Y, Zhang X, Du P. Self-supported copper oxide electrocatalyst for water oxidation at low overpotential and confirmation of its robustness by Cu K-edge x-ray absorption spectroscopy. J Phys Chem C. 2016;120(2):831–840.
26.
Klaiphet K, Saisopa T, Pokapanich W, Tangsukworakhun S, Songsiriritthigul C, Saiyasombat C, Céolin D, Songsiriritthigul P. Structural study of Cu(II):glycine solution by x-ray absorption spectroscopy. J Phys Conf Ser. 2018;1144:Article 012063.
27.
Yang L, Xu H, Liu H, Zeng X, Cheng D, Huang Y, Zheng L, Cao R, Cao D. Oxygen-reconstituted active species of single-atom Cu catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. Research. 2020;2020:7593023.
28.
Shi H, Zhou Y-T, Yao R-Q, Wan W-B, Zhang Q-H, Gu L, Wen Z, Lang XY, Jiang Q. Intermetallic Cu5Zr clusters anchored on hierarchical nanoporous copper as efficient catalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction. Research. 2020;2020:2987234.
29.
Chen L, Chen J, Fan L, Chen J, Zhang T, Chen J, Xi S, Chen B, Wang L. Additive-assisted electrodeposition of Cu on gas diffusion electrodes enables selective CO2 reduction to multicarbon products. ACS Catal. 2023;13(18):11934–11944.
30.
Wang P, Yang H, Tang C, Wu Y, Zheng Y, Cheng T, Davey K, Huang X, Qiao SZ. Boosting electrocatalytic CO2–to–ethanol production via asymmetric C–C coupling. Nat Commun. 2022;13:3754.
31.
Li F, Li YC, Wang Z, Li J, Nam D-H, Lum Y, Luo M, Wang X, Ozden A, Hung SF, et al.Cooperative CO2-to-ethanol conversion via enriched intermediates at molecule–metal catalyst interfaces. Nat Catal. 2019;3:75–82.
32.
Xu A, Hung S-F, Cao A, Wang Z, Karmodak N, Huang JE, Yan Y, Sedighian Rasouli A, Ozden A, Wu FY, et al.Copper/alkaline earth metal oxide interfaces for electrochemical CO2-to-alcohol conversion by selective hydrogenation. Nat Catal. 2022;5:1081–1088.
33.
Ma W, Xie S, Liu T, Fan Q, Ye J, Sun F, Jiang Z, Zhang Q, Cheng J, Wang Y. Electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 to ethylene and ethanol through hydrogen-assisted C–C coupling over fluorine-modified copper. Nat Catal. 2020;3:478–487.
34.
Fang M, Wang M, Wang Z, Zhang Z, Zhou H, Dai L, Zhu Y, Jiang L. Hydrophobic, ultrastable Cuδ+ for robust CO2 electroreduction to C2 products at ampere-current levels. J Am Chem Soc. 2023;145(20):11323–11332.
35.
Luo M, Wang Z, Li YC, Li J, Li F, Lum Y, Nam DH, Chen B, Wicks J, Xu A, et al.Hydroxide promotes carbon dioxide electroreduction to ethanol on copper via tuning of adsorbed hydrogen. Nat Commun. 2019;10:5814.
36.
Zang Y, Liu T, Wei P, Li H, Wang Q, Wang G, Bao X. Selective CO2 electroreduction to ethanol over a carbon-coated CuOx catalyst. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2022;61(40):Article e202209629.
37.
An L, Zhang H, Zhu J, Xi S, Huang B, Sun M, Peng Y, Xi P, Yan CH. Balancing activity and stability in spinel cobalt oxides through geometrical sites occupation towards efficient electrocatalytic oxygen evolution. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2023;62(3):Article e202214600.
38.
Hu Y, Zheng Y, Jin J, Wang Y, Peng Y, Yin J, Shen W, Hou Y, Zhu L, An L, et al.Understanding the sulphur-oxygen exchange process of metal sulphides prior to oxygen evolution reaction. Nat Commun. 2023;14:1949.
39.
Chen X, Chen J, Alghoraibi NM, Henckel DA, Zhang R, Nwabara UO, Madsen KE, Kenis PJA, Zimmerman SC, Gewirth AA. Electrochemical CO2-to-ethylene conversion on polyamine-incorporated Cu electrodes. Nat Catal. 2020;4:20–27.
40.
Ji Y, Yin Z-W, Yang Z, Deng Y-P, Chen H, Lin C, Yang L, Yang K, Zhang M, Xiao Q, et al.From bulk to interface: Electrochemical phenomena and mechanism studies in batteries via electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance. Chem Soc Rev. 2021;50:10743–10763.
41.
Tsai W-Y, Taberna P-L, Simon P. Electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance (EQCM) study of ion dynamics in nanoporous carbons. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:8722–8728.
42.
Cheng T, Fortunelli A, Goddard WA. Reaction intermediates during operando electrocatalysis identified from full solvent quantum mechanics molecular dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116(16):7718–7722.
43.
Yokoyama Y, Miyazaki K, Kondo Y, Miyahara Y, Fukutsuka T, Abe T. In situ local pH measurements with hydrated iridium oxide ring electrodes in neutral pH aqueous solutions. Chem Lett. 2020;49(2):195–198.
44.
Ouyang Y, Shi L, Bai X, Ling C, Li Q, Wang J. Selectivity of electrochemical CO2 reduction toward ethanol and ethylene: The key role of surface-active hydrogen. ACS Catal. 2023;13:15448–15456.
Year 2025 volume 8 Issue 7
PDF
32
18
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.34133/research.0796
  • Receive Date:2025-05-27
  • Online Date:2026-10-30
  • Published:2025-07-20
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-05-27
  • Revised:2025-06-29
  • Accepted:2025-07-02
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China(22425105, 22221001, 22271124, 22471103, U22A20107 and 22201111)
Affiliations
    1State Key Laboratory of Applied Organic Chemistry, Frontiers Science Center for Rare Isotopes, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
    2College of Energy Material and Chemistry; Inner Mongolia Advanced Research Institute; Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Low Carbon Catalysis; Inner Mongolia University Hohhot 010021, China
    3Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Rare Earth Materials Chemistry and Applications, PKU-HKU Joint Laboratory in Rare Earth Materials and Bioinorganic Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, China

Corresponding:

* Address correspondence to: (P.X.);
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/research/EN/10.34133/research.0796
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT