Home Journals Articles Updates About
CN
image
收藏切换
Broadband, Polarization-Sensitive, and Self-Powered High-Performance Photodetection of Hetero-Integrated MoS2 on Lithium Niobate
收藏切换
PDF
Zhigang He1, Heyuan Guan1, *, Xijie Liang1, Junteng Chen1, 2, Manyan Xie1, 2, Kaiwen Luo1, 2, Ran An3, Liang Ma4, Fengkai Ma1, Tiefeng Yang1, *, Huihui Lu1, 2, *
Research. Vol 6 Article ID 0199
Less
收藏切换
Research. Vol 6 Article ID 0199
• Research Article •
Broadband, Polarization-Sensitive, and Self-Powered High-Performance Photodetection of Hetero-Integrated MoS2 on Lithium Niobate
Full
Zhigang He1, Heyuan Guan1, *, Xijie Liang1, Junteng Chen1, 2, Manyan Xie1, 2, Kaiwen Luo1, 2, Ran An3, Liang Ma4, Fengkai Ma1, Tiefeng Yang1, *, Huihui Lu1, 2, *
Affiliations
  • 1Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Optical Fiber Sensing and Communications, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China.
  • 2Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Information and Sensing Technologies of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China.
  • 3Institute of Fluid Physics, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang 621900, China.
  • 4College of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Hengyang Normal University, Hengyang 421008, China.
Published: 2023-07-20 doi: 10.34133/research.0199
Outline
收藏切换

High-performance photodetectors hold promising potential in optical communication and imaging systems. However, conventional counterparts are suffering narrow detection range, high power consumption, and poor polarization sensitivity. Characteristics originating from switchable polarization in ferroelectrics can be used to optimize the photo-to-electric procedure and improve the photodetection performance. In this regard, we constructed a configuration by integrating 2-dimensional molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) with ferroelectric lithium niobate (LiNbO3), resulting in the MoS2/LiNbO3 heterostructured photodetector. Benefiting from the pyroelectric effect of LiNbO3, the limitation of bandgap on the detection range can be broken, thus broadening the response band of the detector to 365 to 1,064 nm, as well as enabling the self-powered characteristic. Meanwhile, high carrier mobility and decent light absorbance of MoS2 introduce robust light-matter interactions with the underlying LiNbO3, leading to ultrafast rise/fall times of ≈150 μs/250 μs and switching ratios of up to ≈190. Moreover, the highest responsivity, specific detectivity, and external quantum efficiency achieved were 17.3 A·W−1, 4.3 × 1011 Jones, and 4,645.78%, respectively. Furthermore, because of the anisotropy of the spontaneous-polarized LiNbO3 substrate, the photocurrent of the device achieved a dichroic ratio of 7.42, comparing favorably to most MoS2-based photodetectors. This work demonstrates the integration potential between ferroelectric LiNbO3 and 2-dimensional materials for high-performance photodetection.

Zhigang He, Heyuan Guan, Xijie Liang, Junteng Chen, Manyan Xie, Kaiwen Luo, Ran An, Liang Ma, Fengkai Ma, Tiefeng Yang, Huihui Lu. Broadband, Polarization-Sensitive, and Self-Powered High-Performance Photodetection of Hetero-Integrated MoS2 on Lithium Niobate[J]. Research, 2023 , 6 (7) : 0199 - . DOI: 10.34133/research.0199
Full Text
Less
Introduction
Less
High-performance photodetectors offer tremendous potential in various applications, such as optical communication [1–4], optical imaging systems [5–7], medical diagnostics [8,9], and environmental monitoring [10,11]. Recently, 2-dimensional (2D) materials, particularly layered transition metal dichalcogenides, have attracted widespread attention in the field of integrated photodetectors due to their excellent photoelectric properties [12–15]. Among these materials, MoS2 stands out for its weak dark current, high stability, adjustable bandgap of 1.2 to 1.8 eV, high carrier mobility of 200 cm2·(V·s)−1, and strong light absorbance in the spectral range of 385 to 670 nm [16–18], representing the most reliable 2D layered semiconductor with excellent comprehensive optoelectronic properties [2], making it a frequently preferred option for utilization in optoelectronic devices such as photodetectors, field-effect transistors, and synaptic transistors [19,20]. Nevertheless, in conventional MoS2-based detectors, additional operating voltages are required to drive the directional movement of free carriers to form the photocurrent [21–25], while the detection range is restricted by the bandgap value [26,27], and such detector presents negligible response to the polarized illumination owing to the intrinsic isotropy of the MoS2 lattice [28,29], thereby impeding the MoS2 photodetectors toward low power consumption, broadband, and polarization sensitive. To improve the performance, Lv et al. [30] exploited the ferroelectric nature of poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene) in intimate contact with MoS2, engineering the carrier doping in MoS2 through their reversible polarization by an external poling field, reaching 11.9 A·W−1 at 365 to 532 nm. Except for poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene), LiNbO3 is another important ferroelectric crystal possessing remarkable electro-optical characteristics such as high pyroelectric coefficient of −4 × 10−5 C·(K·m2)−1, a wide light transmission range of 350 to 5,000 nm, and a strong photorefractive effect [31–34]. Currently, LiNbO3 has been widely used in integrated optoelectronic devices, such as active photonics, modulators, and optical frequency comb [35–37]. However, LiNbO3-based photodetectors have received less attention because of the inherent drawback of insulating behavior, such as low conductivity and huge bandgap, which restricts the construction of LiNbO3-based photodetectors and hinders the development of optoelectronic integration based on the LiNbO3 platforms.
To address these issues, Sun et al. [38] used a high-energy ion implantation setup to plant both plasmonic silver (Ag) nanoparticles and Ag ions into the surface of lithium niobate on insulator thin film and observed the localized surface plasmon resonance effect to benefit the photodetection behavior of the insulating LiNbO3, achieving a responsivity of 0.25 A·W−1 and a response time of 16 ms. Besides, assembling with 2D photosensitive materials through van der Waals (vdW) integration is another novel approach to exploiting the application of LiNbO3 in the field of photodetection [39–41]. In our previous work, the pyroelectric characteristic of x-cut LiNbO3 was used to achieve simultaneous n- and p-doping in graphene, forming a homojunction in the zero-gap graphene channel, thus leading to a high sensitivity (≈2.92 × 106 A·W−1) and fast response (rise/fall time of ≈23 ms/23 ms) photodetector [39]. Whereas the weak light absorbance of graphene (≈2.3% for single-layer graphene) and large dark current greatly limited the graphene-based detector toward high switching ratio [21,42–44], the polarization detection of incident light is not integrated into the lithium-niobate-based photodetector.
In this work, we conceived and constructed a MoS2/LiNbO3 heterojunction photodetector to effectively overcome the challenges mentioned above. The ferroelectric polarization of x-cut LiNbO3 can be tuned upon external laser illumination, namely, the pyroelectric effect, thus leading to the asymmetrical doping in the MoS2, redefining the carrier distribution in the channel, and the generated internal electric field enables self-powered operation without additional bias voltage. Drawing upon the pyroelectric effect of LiNbO3 over extraordinarily wide spectral extent [45–48], the limitation imposed by semiconductor bandgap on detection range can be broken through to 365 to 1,064 nm. Concurrently, the inherent shortcomings of pristine LiNbO3 can be compensated by integration with MoS2, the high mobility and high light absorption characteristics of the latter unit help to improve the performance of the whole heterojunction device to a minimum rise/fall time of ≈150 μs/250 μs, a maximum switching ratio of ≈190, as well as the exceptional obtainable responsivity, specific detectivity, and external quantum efficiency (EQE) of 17.3 A·W−1, 4.3 × 1011 Jones, and 4645.78%, respectively. In addition, ferroelectric LiNbO3 is sensitive to polarized light because of its anisotropic crystal arrangement [49–53], and this polarization detection ability can be inherited to heterojunction detectors through pyroelectric effect, resulting in a dichroic ratio up to 7.42 in self-powered mode, surpassing most previously reported configurations that integrated MoS2 with anisotropic GeSe [54], ReSe2 [55], and TiS3 [56]. This work exhibits a distinctive complementary advantage of integrating ferroelectric LiNbO3 and 2D layered semiconductor materials through vdW integration to realize high-performance photodetection, which can pave the way for the on-chip optoelectronic integration based on the LiNbO3 platform.
Results and Discussion
Less
Device fabrication
Figure 1A shows the schematic structure of a MoS2/LiNbO3 device, in which a piece of x-cut LiNbO3 is used as the substrate, while 2D MoS2 works as the channel material. In our case, 2 pairs of electrodes are designed and patterned parallel to the z-axis direction of the LiNbO3 substrate, since the structural anisotropy of LiNbO3 is largest along the z axis [32], which is beneficial to maximize the ferroelectric polarization characteristics of LiNbO3. To utilize the high conductivity of MoS2 to compensate for the poor conductivity of LiNbO3, we selected mechanically exfoliated multilayer MoS2 due to its low defect concentration. More details about the fabrication process can be seen in Materials and Methods and Fig. S1. Figure 1B depicts the cross-sectional atomic structure of the MoS2/LiNbO3 heterojunction, from which we can see that the surface of 2D MoS2 is atomically flat and there are no unsaturated dangling bonds, which ensures its compatibility with LiNbO3 and can be used to construct devices through vdW integration. As for the underlying LiNbO3 crystal, niobium (Nb) and lithium (Li) will move in the same direction along the c axis, Nb deviates from the center of the oxygen octahedron, while Li deviates from the common plane of the oxygen octahedron, and an electric dipole moment along the c axis is generated, resulting in the spontaneous polarization characteristic [57]. Figure 1C presents the optical microscope image of the real MoS2/LiNbO3 device, where a mechanically exfoliated MoS2 with lateral size of ≈30 μm × 40 μm is evenly laid between 4 Au electrodes and in good contact with them, and the separation between the upper and lower electrodes is ≈10 μm, while the left and right electrodes are spaced ≈20 μm apart. To investigate the roughness of the achieved MoS2/LiNbO3 device, we characterized and tested the MoS2 using an atomic force microscope (AFM), as shown in Fig. 1D. The AFM image is acquired from the red square area in Fig. 1C of the device, it can be observed that the boundary between MoS2 and the Au electrode is clear. Figure 1E displays the height line profile across the boundary, indicating that the thickness of MoS2 obtained is ≈12.5 nm and the noticeable difference in thickness between the MoS2 and the underlying Au electrode indicates a close and uniform contact (more details about the microstructure can be seen in Figs. S2 and S3). Besides, the Raman spectrum was used to characterize the quality of the MoS2 on x-cut LiNbO3 (Fig. 1F). Under the excitation of a 532-nm laser, 2 prominent peaks around 385 and 410 cm−1 are observed, which correspond to the in-plane E1 2g mode and the out-of-plane A1g mode of MoS2, respectively [58]. The lowest frequencies at 152 and 238 cm−1 in the Raman spectra of the x-cut LiNbO3 are mainly due to the deformation of the Nb–O framework. Nb motions appear below 300 cm4 Frequencies within the range of 270 to 400 cm−1 are affected by the displacement of Li cation, whereas the bending modes of O–Nb–O are observed below and at 432 cm−1 and are strongly correlated with the Li–O stretching and O–Li–O bending modes. The range of 550 to 670 cm−1 is associated with Nb–O stretching modes involving shifts of oxygen atoms [59,60]. More importantly, all the characteristic peaks show no substantial shift, indicating that the material characterization remains unchanged after the preparation of the MoS2/LiNbO3 heterojunction, which demonstrates the high quality of the heterojunction.
Photoresponse of MoS2/LiNbO3 photodetector
The photoresponse behavior of the achieved MoS2/LiNbO3 device is firstly examined. As shown in Fig. 2A, upon irradiation of a 365-nm laser, the current dramatically increased and monotonically rose to more than 421.1 nA at 1-μW incident power, exhibiting an apparent photosensitive characteristic. As for the situation of 660-nm laser irradiation, the current gradually increases from 58.5 to 454.2 nA, as the power increases from 5 nW to 1 μW (Fig. 2B). In addition to showing good photoresponse in the ultraviolet and visible bands (see Fig. S4), the device even exhibits marked photoelectric response under light irradiation with energy less than the bandgap of MoS2, extending the response range to near-infrared (NIR) band (1,064 nm), which is absent in pristine MoS2 device, as shown in Fig. 2C. The photocurrent (Iph) that can be expressed by Iph = Ilight − Idark is a very intuitive physical quantity used to describe photoelectric detection capability, and the photocurrent as a function of the incident power is plotted in Fig. 2D, showing very good linear characteristics in the double exponential coordinate system under laser irradiation covering ultraviolet-visible-NIR, and the relationship between Iph and Pin can be fitted with power exponentials (Iph ∝ Pinα) within over 97% coefficient of determination, where the maximum α ≈ 0.45 (see Table S1). Moreover, the extracted photocurrent can be further used to calculate the photoresponsivity (R) and specific photodetectivity (D*), which follow the equations of R = Iph / Pin and D* = RA/2eIdark, respectively. Here, A is the effective illumination area of the conductive channel, e is the electron charge, and λ is the irradiation wavelength (see Fig. 2E). Furthermore, EQE = Rhc / eλ was also calculated, as shown in Fig. 2F, and it can be seen that R, D*, and EQE decrease exponentially with the increase in light intensity due to larger recombination and scattering probability under strong light illumination than that under weak light illumination [61], which is consistent with the previous reports on MoS2-based photodetectors. Specifically, at a bias voltage of 2 V, a wavelength of 462 nm, and a low incident power of 5 nW, the device achieves an R of 17.3 A·W−1, a D* of 4.3 × 1011 Jones, and an EQE of 4,645.78%, demonstrating the device’s terrific sensitivity at weak incident power. The evolution of photocurrent as a function of incident laser wavelength can be seen in Fig. S5, and 2 distinct peaks located at 462 and 660 nm can be attributed to the C– and A– exciton related absorption of MoS2, respectively [62,63]. The linear dynamic range (LDR) is another critical parameter used to evaluate the performance of a detector, which can be expressed by LDR = 20 log(Psat / Plow), where Psat and Plow correspond to the highest and lowest incident intensities at which the photocurrent–power curve deviates from the linear range. Under 808-nm illumination, the device achieves an LDR of ≈84 dB (as shown in Fig. S6), further emphasizing its high performance.
Response time of MoS2/LiNbO3 photodetector
The photodetector’s rise time is typically defined as the duration required for the current to ascend from 10% to 90% of its maximum value, whereas the fall time is described as the time necessary for the current to descend from 90% to 10%. As illustrated in Fig. S7, the apparatus exhibits a swift response time for pulsed illumination over a broad spectrum ranging from 365 to 1,064 nm, with a microsecond response speed in the visible range. As depicted in Fig. 3A, the response rate of the device is obviously improved after applying a bias voltage, and the optimized bias is 4 V, achieving a fast speed of ~150 μs. Furthermore, a bias voltage of only 5 mV is required to achieve the fastest response time of 26 ms under 1,064-nm irradiation (Fig. S7K), providing a solution for rapid NIR photoresponse. In Fig. 3B, the device’s response stability to light over the course of 25 light cycles is presented, and it exhibits excellent repeatable switching characteristics. When the incident power is 10 μW, as illustrated in Fig. 3C, the device has the shortest response time to a 462-nm laser, with a rise time of ≈150 μs and a fall time of ≈250 μs, which is 250 times faster than that of the MoS2/SiO2/Si photodetector (Fig. S8C). To comprehensively characterize the outstanding performance of the device, Fig. 3D emphasizes the premium performance of the device compared to previously reported devices [21,22,25,61,64–77], indicating its capability to achieve faster response speed over the broad wavelength range while maintaining a decent responsivity.
Self-powered response of MoS2/LiNbO3 photodetector at 0 bias
The aforementioned results have clearly shown that the photodetection performance including R, D*, EQE, and response speed of the novel MoS2/LiNbO3 device is superior to that of the MoS2/SiO2/Si device, showing orders of magnitude improvement (Fig. S8B). To explore the reason for the remarkable improvement in device performance and reveal the interaction mechanism between LiNbO3 and 2D MoS2, we conducted systematic photoresponse measurements before and after the vdW integration process under zero bias (Fig. S9), thus obtaining the comparison between pristine LiNbO3 device and MoS2/LiNbO3 device (Fig. 4A). Upon a 405-nm laser irradiation, as the laser is turned on and off, forward and reverse current spikes are generated in the pristine LiNbO3 device (Fig. 4B), the pyroelectric current direction between electrodes 1 and 2 and 3 and 4 is the same, while the pyroelectric current direction between electrodes 1 and 3 and 2 and 4 is opposite, showing that the charges accumulated by electrodes 1 to 3 and electrodes 2 to 4 are opposite (see Fig. 4A), which is consistent with the previous results [39]. After a MoS2 flake is assembled onto the LiNbO3 substrate, the MoS2/LiNbO3 device is obtained. The light irradiation would bring in a local temperature increase in LiNbO3, resulting in a reduction of the spontaneous polarization intensity. Therefore, the binding ability of ferroelectric polarization on the surface charge of LiNbO3 is weakened, resulting in holes and electrons being injected into the MoS2 channel along both sides of the z direction, thus modulating the distribution of carriers in the channel and forming an internal electric field, driving the photogenerated carriers to move directionally, and donating the device the self-powered function without bias voltage; and the R, D*, and EQE of self-powered response can be found in Fig. S10. The response time of the device was evaluated under various laser wavelengths at 0 bias voltage, and the results are depicted in Fig. 4C to E. It can be seen that with the increase in incident power, the photoconductivity effect of MoS2 and the pyroelectric effect of LiNbO3 are jointly enhanced, which can boost the response speed from both aspects. In particular, the 462-nm group exhibited the fastest response time at an incident power of 1 μW, with a rise time of ≈20 ms and a fall time of ≈40 ms (Fig. 4C), further showcasing the fast response of the device in self-drive mode. Furthermore, when an externally applied bias is superimposed on the electric field generated by the pyroelectric effect, it can also facilitate the efficient separation of photogenerated electron-hole pairs and expedite the response time of the device (as shown in Fig. 3). In addition, with the aid of the pyroelectric effect of LiNbO3 over extraordinarily wide spectral extent and the lower dark current of MoS2 [45–48], the device is capable of low-noise, self-powered optical sensing in the broad range of 365 to 1,064 nm and switching ratios up to ≈190 (see Fig. 4C and Fig. S11).
Polarization detection of MoS2/LiNbO3 photodetector
The ferroelectric properties of LiNbO3 are mainly due to the spontaneous polarization caused by the structural anisotropy of the crystal lattice. Therefore, polarization-related characterizations become very important to reveal the working mechanism of the device. As shown in Fig. 5A, a beam of circularly polarized light is incident on MoS2/LiNbO3 device after passing through a linear polarizer, and, at the same time, the polarization angle can be continuously changed by rotating a half wave plate (more details can be found in Materials and Methods and Fig. S12). In addition to the light-absorption-induced enhancement on the carrier concentration in MoS2, the ferroelectric LiNbO3 is sensitive to polarized light because of its anisotropic crystal structure. Upon laser irradiation, a spatial separation of the charges arises in LiNbO3 crystal, and the resulted internal electric field would lead to a modulation in the refractive indices [49,50], such photorefractive effect enables the polarization sensitive characteristic for the anisotropic LiNbO3 [51–53], and the polarization-angle-dependent pyroelectric charges would inject into the MoS2 channel (more details about the band structures of MoS2 and LiNbO3 can be found in Fig. S13) [78–80], thus enabling the polarization detection ability to the MoS2/LiNbO3 detector, while such phenomenon cannot be observed in MoS2/SiO2/Si detector (see Fig. S8D). Then, the output current of the detector is collected by the source meter to obtain the polarization response characteristics of the device. Figure 5B presents the relationship between photocurrent and polarized angle, with the MoS2/LiNbO3 detector showing a typical “8” shape, indicating a good polarization-sensitive behavior; more importantly, the photocurrent’s polarization dichroic ratio attains the maximum value of 7.42 when the bias voltage is 0, and similar behavior is also observed at other wavelengths (Fig. S14). However, the result collected from a MoS2/SiO2/Si detector is different, showing that the photocurrent is independent of the polarization angle, which can be ascribed to the isotropy of both MoS2 lattice [28,29] and SiO2/Si substrate. Figure 5C displays a contour plot depicting the output photocurrent as a function of the incident polarization direction of the 462-nm laser and the bias voltage, from which we can see that the polarization dichroic ratio of the photocurrent gradually decreases as the bias voltage increases, because a larger bias voltage could drive a larger current in the channel, while the pyroelectric current from LiNbO3 injected into the MoS2 channel is mainly controlled by the laser irradiation and fixed; thus, its proportion to the total current decreases, resulting in a reduced dichroic ratio.
Conclusion
Less
In summary, a MoS2/LiNbO3 heterojunction photodetector is designed and constructed, in which the ferroelectric characteristics of LiNbO3 and the semiconductor characteristics of MoS2 are well integrated and utilized, leading to improved photodetection performance: self-powered operation, broad detection range of 365 to 1,064 nm, fast rise/fall time (≈150 μs/250 μs), large switching ratio (≈190), high responsivity (17.3 A·W−1), high specific detectivity (4.3 × 1011 Jones), and large EQE (4645.78%). More interestingly, the internal electric field of LiNbO3 can be regulated by polarized irradiation, thus producing a dichroic ratio of 7.42 for the MoS2/LiNbO3 detector in self-powered mode, compared favorably than most MoS2-based heterostructured devices. On the basis of the foregoing results, this work has greatly promoted the investigation to elucidate the contribution of ferroelectrics in augmenting the photodetection performance, proposing a feasible strategy for cost-effective and high-performance broadband polarization-sensitive photodetectors.
Materials and Methods
Less
Device fabrication
The MoS2/LiNbO3 device was fabricated through a vdW integration approach that combined a standard photolithography process and dry transfer process. A 500-μm-thick x-cut LiNbO3 was utilized as the substrate (1.2 cm × 1 cm), and photolithography was used to define the device pattern onto the substrate, followed by the sequential deposition of a Cr layer (5 nm) and an Au layer (80 nm), forming the electrodes for electric contact. Afterward, the MoS2 thin layer was exfoliated by using Scotch tape, then picked up by a polydimethylsiloxane film (Metatest Corporation), and attached to a transparent glass slide. After that, the target MoS2 sample was precisely positioned above the LiNbO3 electrode under the transfer station (Metatest Corporation, E1-T), and then the sample was lowered and gradually contacted to the prefabricated electrodes; after they are fully touched, the specimen was heated up to 80 °C for 10 min, and then the polydimethylsiloxane can be removed and finally obtained the MoS2/LiNbO3 device. It is worth noting that no solution was introduced during the whole process, minimizing the damage to the sample during the processing, and more details can be found in Fig. S1.
Characterizations
The Bioscope Catalyst/Multimode scanning probe microscope was utilized to measure the thickness of MoS2 and Au electrodes. The LabRAM INV laser micro-confocal Raman spectrometer characterized the lattice vibration behavior of the MoS2/LiNbO3 heterojunction using a 532-nm laser. A schematic of the system used to test the optoelectronic performance of the MoS2/LiNbO3 photodetector is displayed in Fig. S15. A Tektronix AFG3102 signal generator was used to modulate lasers of varying wavelengths, intermittently illuminating the device. The Keithley 2601B source meter was used to collect the device’s volt–ampere and time–ampere characteristic curves under different laser irradiation conditions. Specifically, a linear polarizer and a half-wave plate were introduced into the optical path, enabling us to characterize the polarization-sensitive photodetection behavior (Fig. S12). The power of the laser was measured by the NOVA II OPHIR optical power meter, all the device measurements were conducted in the atmosphere at room temperature, and all device data were recorded by the Keithley KickStart software.
Band structure calculation
The band structures of MoS2 and LiNbO3 were calculated on the basis of the density functional theory, as implemented in the Vienna ab initio package, and Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof method was used for the exchange–correlation functional [81–83]. The cutoff energy was 600 eV, and all the atoms in the slab were allowed to fully relax until the forces acting on them are less than 0.01 eV·Å−1.
References
Less
1.
Pospischil A, Humer M, Furchi MM, Bachmann D, Guider R, Fromherz T, Mueller T. CMOS-compatible graphene photodetector covering all optical communication bands. Nat Photonics. 2013;7(11):892–896.
2.
Mak KF, Shan J. Photonics and optoelectronics of 2D semiconductor transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat Photonics. 2016;10(4):216–226.
3.
Mueller T, Xia F, Avouris P. Graphene photodetectors for high-speed optical communications. Nat Photonics. 2010;4(5):297–301.
4.
Gao L, Ma C, Wei S, Kuklin AV, Zhang H, Ågren H. Applications of few-layer Nb2C MXene: Narrow-band photodetectors and femtosecond mode-locked fiber lasers. ACS Nano. 2021;15(1):954–965.
5.
Dou L, Yang Y, You J, Hong Z, Chang WH, Li G, Yang Y. Solution-processed hybrid perovskite photodetectors with high detectivity. Nat Commun. 2014;5(1):5404.
6.
Lien MB, Liu CH, Chun IY, Ravishankar S, Nien H, Zhou M, Fessler JA, Zhong Z, Norris TB. Ranging and light field imaging with transparent photodetectors. Nat Photonics. 2020;14(3):143–148.
7.
Lopez-Sanchez O, Lembke D, Kayci M, Radenovic A, Kis A. Ultrasensitive photodetectors based on monolayer MoS2. Nat Nanotechnol. 2013;8(7):497–501.
8.
Wei H, Fang Y, Mulligan P, Chuirazzi W, Fang HH, Wang C, Ecker BR, Gao Y, Loi MA, Cao L, et al.Sensitive X-ray detectors made of methylammonium lead tribromide perovskite single crystals. Nat Photonics. 2016;10(5):333–339.
9.
Yakunin S, Sytnyk M, Kriegner D, Shrestha S, Richter M, Matt GJ, Azimi H, Brabec CJ, Stangl J, Kovalenko MV, et al.Detection of x-ray photons by solution-processed lead halide perovskites. Nat Photonics. 2015;9(7):444–449.
10.
Liu X, Gu L, Zhang Q, Wu J, Long Y, Fan Z. All-printable band-edge modulated ZnO nanowire photodetectors with ultra-high detectivity. Nat Commun. 2014;5(1):4007.
11.
Lu X, Jiang P, Bao X. Phonon-enhanced photothermoelectric effect in SrTiO3 ultra-broadband photodetector. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):138.
12.
Guo Z, Cao R, Wang H, Zhang X, Meng F, Chen X, Gao S, Sang DK, Nguyen TH, Duong AT, et al.High-performance polarization-sensitive photodetectors on two-dimensional β-InSe. Natl Sci Rev. 2022;9(5):Article nwab098.
13.
Zhang Y, Huang P, Guo J, Shi R, Huang W, Shi Z, Wu L, Zhang F, Gao L, Li C, et al.Graphdiyne-based flexible photodetectors with high responsivity and detectivity. Adv Mater. 2020;32(23):Article 2001082.
14.
Qiao H, Huang Z, Ren X, Liu S, Zhang Y, Qi X, Zhang H. Self-powered photodetectors based on 2D materials. Adv Opt Mater. 2020;8(1):Article 1900765.
15.
Lee D, So S, Hu G, Kim M, Badloe T, Cho H, Kim J, Kim H, Qiu CW, Rho J. Hyperbolic metamaterials: Fusing artificial structures to natural 2D materials. eLight. 2022;2:Article 1.
16.
Thomas N, Mathew S, Nair KM, O'Dowd K, Forouzandeh P, Goswami A, McGranaghan G, Pillai SC. 2D MoS2: Structure, mechanisms, and photocatalytic applications. Mater Today Sustain. 2021;13:Article 100073.
17.
Yalon E, Aslan B, Smithe KKH, McClellan CJ, Suryavanshi SV, Xiong F, Sood A, Neumann CM, Xu X, Goodson KE, et al.Temperature-dependent thermal boundary conductance of monolayer MoS2 by Raman thermometry. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(49):43013–43020.
18.
Radisavljevic B, Radenovic A, Brivio J, Giacometti V, Kis A. Single-layer MoS2 transistors. Nat Nanotechnol. 2011;6(3):147–150.
19.
Zhuo F, Wu J, Li B, Li M, Tan CL, Luo Z, Sun H, Xu Y, Yu Z. Modifying the power and performance of 2-dimensional MoS2 field effect transistors. Research. 2023;6:Article 0057.
20.
Wang S, Hou X, Liu L, Li J, Shan Y, Wu S, Zhang DW, Zhou P. A photoelectric-stimulated MoS2 transistor for neuromorphic engineering. Research. 2019;2019:Article 1618798.
21.
Xu H, Wu J, Feng Q, Mao N, Wang C, Zhang J. High responsivity and gate tunable graphene-MoS2 hybrid phototransistor. Small. 2014;10(11):2300–2306.
22.
Choi MS, Qu D, Lee D, Liu X, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Yoo WJ. Lateral MoS2 p-n junction formed by chemical doping for use in high-performance optoelectronics. ACS Nano. 2014;8(9):9332–9340.
23.
Li HM, Lee D, Qu D, Liu X, Ryu J, Seabaugh A, Yoo WJ. Ultimate thin vertical p-n junction composed of two-dimensional layered molybdenum disulfide. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6564.
24.
Svatek SA, Antolin E, Lin DY, Frisenda R, Reuter C, Molina-Mendoza AJ, Muñoz M, Agraït N, Ko TS, de Lara DP, et al.Gate tunable photovoltaic effect in MoS2 vertical p–n homostructures. J Mater Chem C. 2017;5(4):854–861.
25.
Fan T, Xie Z, Huang W, Li Z, Zhang H. Two-dimensional non-layered selenium nanoflakes: Facile fabrications and applications for self-powered photo-detector. Nanotechnology. 2019;30(11):Article 114002.
26.
Lee HS, Min SW, Chang YG, Park MK, Nam T, Kim H, Kim JH, Ryu S, Im S. MoS2 nanosheet phototransistors with thickness-modulated optical energy gap. Nano Lett. 2012;12(7):3695–3700.
27.
Choi W, Cho MY, Konar A, Lee JH, Cha GB, Hong SC, Kim S, Kim J, Jena D, Joo J, et al.High-detectivity multilayer MoS2 phototransistors with spectral response from ultraviolet to infrared. Adv Mater. 2012;24(43):5832–5836.
28.
Shiri M, Madani A, Shaabani N. Optical properties of molybdenum disulfide based photonic crystal. Opt Quant Electron. 2021;53(2):Article 105.
29.
Wang QH, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kis A, Coleman JN, Strano MS. Electronics and optoelectronics of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat Nanotechnol. 2012;7(11):699–712.
30.
Lv L, Zhuge F, Xie F, Xiong X, Zhang Q, Zhang N, Huang Y, Zhai T. Reconfigurable two-dimensional optoelectronic devices enabled by local ferroelectric polarization. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):3331.
31.
Weis RS, Gaylord TK. Lithium niobate: Summary of physical properties and crystal structure. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process. 1985;37(4):191–203.
32.
Arizmendi L. Photonic applications of lithium niobate crystals. Phys Status Solidi A. 2004;201(2):253–283.
33.
Ghambaryan IA, Guo R, Hovsepyan RK, Poghosyan AR, Vardanyan ES, Lazaryan VG. Creation of periodical antiparallel domain structure in lithium niobate crystals during growth process. Ferroelectr Lett Sect. 2003;30(3-4):59–67.
34.
Xue D, Kitamura K. Crystal structure and ferroelectricity of lithium niobate crystals. Ferroelectrics. 2003;297(1):19–27.
35.
Li M, Hong L, Li ZY. Intense two-octave ultraviolet-visible-infrared supercontinuum laser via high-efficiency one-octave second-harmonic generation. Research. 2022;2022:Article 9871729.
36.
Xu M, He M, Zhang H, Jian J, Pan Y, Liu X, Chen L, Meng X, Chen H, Li Z, et al.High-performance coherent optical modulators based on thin-film lithium niobate platform. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):3911.
37.
Wang C, Zhang M, Chen X, Bertrand M, Shams-Ansari A, Chandrasekhar S, Winzer P, Lončar M. Integrated lithium niobate electro-optic modulators operating at CMOS-compatible voltages. Nature. 2018;562(7725):101–104.
38.
Sun X, Sheng Y, Gao X, Liu Y, Ren F, Tan Y, Yang Z, Jia Y, Chen F. Self-powered lithium niobate thin-film photodetectors. Small. 2022;18(35):Article e2203532.
39.
Guan H, Hong J, Wang X, Ming J, Zhang Z, Liang A, Han X, Dong J, Qiu W, Chen Z, et al.Broadband, high-sensitivity graphene photodetector based on ferroelectric polarization of lithium Niobate. Adv Opt Mater. 2021;9(16):Article 2100245.
40.
Baeumer C, Saldana-Greco D, Martirez JM, Rappe AM, Shim M, Martin LW. Ferroelectrically driven spatial carrier density modulation in graphene. Nat Commun. 2015;6:Article 6136.
41.
Gopalan KK, Janner D, Nanot S, Parret R, Lundeberg MB, Koppens FHL, Pruneri V. Mid-infrared pyroresistive graphene detector on LiNbO3. Adv Opt Mater. 2017;5(4):Article 1600723.
42.
Sun Z, Chang H. Graphene and graphene-like two-dimensional materials in photodetection: Mechanisms and methodology. ACS Nano. 2014;8(5):4133–4156.
43.
Bao Q, Loh KP. Graphene photonics, Plasmonics, and broadband optoelectronic devices. ACS Nano. 2012;6(5):3677–3694.
44.
Xia F, Mueller T, Lin YM, Valdes-Garcia A, Avouris P. Ultrafast graphene photodetector. Nat Nanotechnol. 2009;4(12):839–843.
45.
Gebre T, Batra AK, Guggilla P, Aggarwal MD, Lal RB. Pyroelectric properties of pure and doped lithium niobate crystals for infrared sensors. Ferroelectr Lett Sect. 2004;31(5-6):131–139.
46.
Viktor OL, Vasiliy SS, Mykola IK, Leonid VP, editors. Infrared pyroelectric detector based on the system's thin-Pd-film/thick-lithium-niobate substrate implanted by Ar+ ions. In: Materials for infrared detectors III. SPIE; 2003.
47.
Kao MC, Chen HZ, Yang SL, Chen YC, Hsieh PT, Yu CC. Pyroelectric ta-modified LiNbO3 thin films and devices for thermal infrared detection. Thin Solid Films. 2008;516(16):5518–5522.
48.
Lehman JH, Hurst KE, Radojevic AM, Dillon AC, Osgood R. Multiwall carbon nanotube absorber on a thin-film lithium niobate pyroelectric detector. Opt Lett. 2007;32(7):772–774.
49.
Wu S, Chen Y, Wang X, Jiao H, Zhao Q, Huang X, Tai X, Zhou Y, Chen H, Wang X, et al.Ultra-sensitive polarization-resolved black phosphorus homojunction photodetector defined by ferroelectric domains. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):3198.
50.
Syuy AV, Sidorov NV, Palatnikov MN, Teplyakova NA, Shtarev DS, Prokopiv NN. Optical properties of lithium niobate crystals. Optik. 2018;156:239–246.
51.
Zelmon D, Small D, Jundt D. Infrared corrected Sellmeier coefficients for congruently grown lithium niobate and 5 Mol. % magnesium oxide–doped lithium niobate. J Opt Soc Am B. 1997;14:3319–3322.
52.
Warner J, Robertson DS, Hulme KF. The temperature dependence of optical birefringence in lithium niobate. Phys Lett. 1966;20(2):163–164.
53.
Smith DS, Riccius HD, Edwin RP. Refractive indices of lithium niobate. Opt Commun. 1976;17(3):332–335.
54.
Xin Y, Wang X, Chen Z, Weller D, Wang Y, Shi L, Ma X, Ding C, Li W, Guo S, et al.Polarization-sensitive self-powered type-II GeSe/MoS2 van der Waals heterojunction photodetector. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12(13):15406–15413.
55.
Li K, Du C, Gao H, Yin T, Yu Y, Wang W. Ultra-fast and linear polarization-sensitive photodetectors based on ReSe2/MoS2 van der Waals heterostructures. J Mater. 2022;8(6):1158–1164.
56.
Lv T, Huang X, Zhang W, Deng C, Chen F, Wang Y, Long J, Gao H, Deng L, Ye L, et al.High-responsivity multiband and polarization-sensitive photodetector based on the TiS3/MoS2 heterojunction. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2022;14(43):48812–48820.
57.
Xue D, Kitamura K. Crystallographic structure and ferroelectric lithium niobate. Trans Mater Res Soc Jpn. 2003;28(4):1191.
58.
Yan R, Simpson JR, Bertolazzi S, Brivio J, Watson M, Wu X, Kis A, Luo T, Hight Walker AR, Xing HG. Thermal conductivity of monolayer molybdenum disulfide obtained from temperature-dependent Raman spectroscopy. ACS Nano. 2014;8(1):986–993.
59.
Repelin Y, Husson E, Bennani F, Proust C. Raman spectroscopy of lithium niobate and lithium tantalate. Force field calculations. J Phys Chem Solids. 1999;60(6):819–825.
60.
Bhagavannarayana G, Ananthamurthy RV, Budakoti GC, Kumar B, Bartwal KS. A study of the effect of annealing on Fe-doped LiNbO3 by HRXRD, XRT and FT–IR. J Appl Crystallogr. 2005;38(5):768–771.
61.
Shen T, Li F, Zhang Z, Xu L, Qi J. High-performance broadband photodetector based on monolayer MoS2 hybridized with environment-friendly CuInSe2 quantum dots. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12(49):54927–54935.
62.
Mak KF, Lee C, Hone J, Shan J, Heinz TF. Atomically thin MoS2: A new direct-gap semiconductor. Phys Rev Lett. 2010;105(13):Article 136805.
63.
Dhakal KP, Duong DL, Lee J, Nam H, Kim M, Kan M, Lee YH, Kim J. Confocal absorption spectral imaging of MoS2: Optical transitions depending on the atomic thickness of intrinsic and chemically doped MoS2. Nanoscale. 2014;6(21):13028–13035.
64.
Guo J, Li S, He Z, Li Y, Lei Z, Liu Y, Huang W, Gong T, Ai Q, Mao L, et al.Near-infrared photodetector based on few-layer MoS2 with sensitivity enhanced by localized surface plasmon resonance. Appl Surf Sci. 2019;483:1037–1043.
65.
Liu X, Li F, Xu M, Qi J. Self-powered, high response and fast response speed metal-insulator-semiconductor structured photodetector based on 2D MoS2. RSC Adv. 2018;8(49):28041–28047.
66.
Yin Z, Li H, Li H, Jiang L, Shi Y, Sun Y, Lu G, Zhang Q, Chen X, Zhang H. Single-layer MoS2 phototransistors. ACS Nano. 2012;6(1):74–80.
67.
Esmaeili-Rad MR, Salahuddin S. High performance molybdenum disulfide amorphous silicon heterojunction photodetector. Sci Rep. 2013;3:2345.
68.
Zhang X, Liao Q, Kang Z, Liu B, Ou Y, Du J, Xiao J, Gao L, Shan H, Luo Y, et al.Self-healing originated van der Waals homojunctions with strong interlayer coupling for high-performance photodiodes. ACS Nano. 2019;13(3):3280–3291.
69.
Lu J, Lu JH, Liu H, Liu B, Chan KX, Lin J, Chen W, Loh KP, Sow CH. Improved photoelectrical properties of MoS2 films after laser micromachining. ACS Nano. 2014;8(6):6334–6343.
70.
Huang H, Wang X, Wang P, Wu G, Chen Y, Meng C, Liao L, Wang J, Hu W, Shen H, et al.Ferroelectric polymer tuned two dimensional layered MoTe2 photodetector. RSC Adv. 2016;6(90):87416–87421.
71.
Yang Y, Huo N, Li J. Gate-tunable and high optoelectronic performance in multilayer WSe2 P–N diode. J Mater Chem C. 2018;6(43):11673–11678.
72.
Sun M, Fang Q, Xie D, Sun Y, Xu J, Teng C, Dai R, Yang P, Li Z, Li W, et al.Novel transfer behaviors in 2D MoS2/WSe2 heterotransistor and its applications in visible-near infrared photodetection. Adv Electron Mater. 2017;3(4):Article 1600502.
73.
Zheng Z, Zhang T, Yao J, Zhang Y, Xu J, Yang G. Flexible, transparent and ultra-broadband photodetector based on large-area WSe2 film for wearable devices. Nanotechnology. 2016;27(22):Article 225501.
74.
Mitta SB, Ali F, Yang Z, Moon I, Ahmed F, Yoo TJ, Lee BH, Yoo WJ. Gate-modulated ultrasensitive visible and near-infrared photodetection of oxygen plasma-treated WSe2 lateral pn-Homojunctions. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12(20):23261–23271.
75.
Sun J, Wang Y, Guo S, Wan B, Dong L, Gu Y, Song C, Pan C, Zhang Q, Gu L, et al.Lateral 2D WSe2 p-n Homojunction formed by efficient charge-carrier-type modulation for high-performance optoelectronics. Adv Mater. 2020;32(9):Article e1906499.
76.
Gao W, Zhang F, Zheng Z, Li J. Unique and tunable photodetecting performance for two-dimensional layered MoSe2/WSe2 p–n junction on the 4H-SiC substrate. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(21):19277–19285.
77.
Chen X, Qiu Y, Yang H, Liu G, Zheng W, Feng W, Cao W, Hu W, Hu PA. In-plane mosaic potential growth of large-area 2D layered semiconductors MoS2-MoSe2 lateral heterostructures and photodetector application. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(2):1684–1691.
78.
Hossain MM. First-principles study on the structural, elastic, electronic and optical properties of LiNbO3. Heliyon. 2019;5(4):Article e01436.
79.
Cheiwchanchamnangij T, Lambrecht WRL. Quasiparticle band structure calculation of monolayer, bilayer, and bulk MoS2. Phys Rev B. 2012;85(20).
80.
Bhattacharyya S, Singh AK. Semiconductor-metal transition in semiconducting bilayer sheets of transition-metal dichalcogenides. Phys Rev B. 2012;86(7):Article 075454.
81.
Kresse G, Furthmüller J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B. 1996;54(16):11169–11186.
82.
Kresse G, Joubert D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B. 1999;59(3):1758–1775.
83.
Li Y, Schmidt WG, Sanna S. Intrinsic LiNbO3 point defects from hybrid density functional calculations. Phys Rev B. 2014;89(9):Article 094111.
Appendix
Less
Year 2023 volume 6 Issue 7
PDF
58
31
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.34133/research.0199
  • Receive Date：2023-04-10
  • Online Date：2026-10-28
  • Published：2023-07-20
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received：2023-04-10
  • Accepted：2023-07-03
Affiliations
    1Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Optical Fiber Sensing and Communications, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China.
    2Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Information and Sensing Technologies of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China.
    3Institute of Fluid Physics, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang 621900, China.
    4College of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Hengyang Normal University, Hengyang 421008, China.

Corresponding:

* Address correspondence to: (H.G)
(T.Y)
(H.L)
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/research/EN/10.34133/research.0199
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family		 属数
Number of
genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)		 属
Genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT
Links
Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read
Collections
Updates
Events
News
Multimedia
About
About Us
Contact
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
100081
010-62662699(Operation and Technical Support)
qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House