收藏切换
Pathological BBB Crossing Melanin-Like Nanoparticles as Metal-Ion Chelators and Neuroinflammation Regulators against Alzheimer’s Disease
收藏切换
PDF
Qianqian Huang1, Chaoqing Jiang1, Xue Xia1, Yufan Wang1, Chenxing Yan1, Xiaorong Wang1, Ting Lei1, Xiaotong Yang1, Wenqin Yang1, Guo Cheng2, *, Huile Gao1, *
Research. Vol 6 Article ID 0180
Less
收藏切换
Research. Vol 6 Article ID 0180
• Research Article •
Pathological BBB Crossing Melanin-Like Nanoparticles as Metal-Ion Chelators and Neuroinflammation Regulators against Alzheimer’s Disease
Full
Qianqian Huang1, Chaoqing Jiang1, Xue Xia1, Yufan Wang1, Chenxing Yan1, Xiaorong Wang1, Ting Lei1, Xiaotong Yang1, Wenqin Yang1, Guo Cheng2, *, Huile Gao1, *
Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory of Drug-Targeting and Drug Delivery System of the Education Ministry, West China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P.R. China.
  • 2Laboratory of Molecular Translational Medicine, Center for Translational Medicine, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, Department of Pediatrics, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P.R. China.
Published: 2023-06-20 doi: 10.34133/research.0180
Outline
收藏切换

Inflammatory responses, manifested in excessive oxidative stress and microglia overactivation, together with metal ion-triggered amyloid-beta (Aβ) deposition, are critical hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The intricate pathogenesis causes severe impairment of neurons, which, in turn, exacerbates Aβ aggregation and facilitates AD progression. Herein, multifunctional melanin-like metal ion chelators and neuroinflammation regulators (named PDA@K) were constructed for targeted treatment of AD. In this platform, intrinsically bioactive material polydopamine nanoparticles (PDA) with potent metal ion chelating and ROS scavenging effects were decorated with the KLVFF peptide, endowing the system with the capacity of enhanced pathological blood–brain barrier (BBB) crossing and lesion site accumulation via Aβ hitchhiking. In vitro and in vivo experiment revealed that PDA@K had high affinity toward Aβ and were able to hitch a ride on Aβ to achieve increased pathological BBB crossing. The engineered PDA@K effectively mitigated Aβ aggregate and alleviated neuroinflammation. The modulated inflammatory microenvironment by PDA@K promoted microglial polarization toward the M2-like phenotype, which restored their critical functions for neuron care and plaque removal. After 3-week treatment of PDA@K, spatial learning and memory deficit as well as neurologic changes of FAD4T transgenic mice were largely rescued. Transcriptomics analysis further revealed the therapeutic mechanism of PDA@K. Our study provided an appealing paradigm for directly utilizing intrinsic properties of nanomaterials as therapeutics for AD instead of just using them as nanocarriers, which largely widen the application of nanomaterials in AD therapy.

Qianqian Huang, Chaoqing Jiang, Xue Xia, Yufan Wang, Chenxing Yan, Xiaorong Wang, Ting Lei, Xiaotong Yang, Wenqin Yang, Guo Cheng, Huile Gao. Pathological BBB Crossing Melanin-Like Nanoparticles as Metal-Ion Chelators and Neuroinflammation Regulators against Alzheimer’s Disease[J]. Research, 2023 , 6 (6) : 0180 - . DOI: 10.34133/research.0180
Alzheimer’s disease (AD), the most common type of dementia, is a chronic, age-related, multifactorial neurodegenerative disease causing progressive cognitive and memory deterioration [1,2]. In 2019, Alzheimer’s Disease International estimated that AD had a devastating impact on more than 50 million people globally and is expected to triple in 2050 [3,4], which not only brings severe suffering for patients and caregivers, but also gives rise to a huge economic burden on society [5,6]. Currently, clinical therapeutic agents for AD treatment using acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, and galantamine) and non-competitive N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor modulator (memantine) only palliatively relieve cognitive and behavior deterioration but do not prevent further disease progression [7,8]. Hence, efficient therapies targeting pathological mechanisms of AD are imperative.
AD pathogenesis is believed to be mutually reinforced by multiple complex mechanisms [9–12]. Recent advances indicated that neuroinflammation is evident in the early stage of AD patients owing to exacerbated immune response [13,14]. As the important initiator of neuronal damage, oxidative stress leads to more Aβ accumulation through upregulation of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) and increased secretase activity [13,15,16]. In turn, aberrant aggregation of Aβ further exhibits neurotoxicity and triggers pro-inflammatory response [17]. Remodeling abnormal microenvironment of AD lesion by reactive oxygen species (ROS) cascade elimination will be a new perspective for early AD therapy [18–20]. In AD brain, the imbalance of metal ions also contributes to AD development [12,21,22]. Metal ions such as Cu2+ and Zn2+ greatly accelerate neurotoxic Aβ plaque deposition due to high affinity with the N terminus of Aβ [23–25]. The abnormally high concentration of metal ions within Aβ deposits not only stabilizes neurotoxic Aβ plaques but also catalyzes ROS formation and exacerbates neuroinflammation [26,27]. Metal-ion chelation has proven to be an effective strategy for AD therapy to prevent Aβ deposition and ROS production [28–30]. Since limited effectiveness toward single Aβ inhibition to regulate cognitive decline have been shown in numerous trials [31,32], multi-target strategies in AD therapy would be more promising.
As intrinsic immune cells of the brain, microglia are precisely tailored by brain environment [33]. Mounting evidence showed that microglial dysfunction initiates at a very early stage and persists throughout the whole AD development [14,34]. What is worse, the abnormal function of microglia intertwines with Aβ deposits and jointly promote AD aggravation. Specifically, the accumulated Aβ plaques impair phagocytic function of microglia and transform microglia to a pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype, resulting in overproduction of ROS and various inflammatory factors [35,36], which, in turn, undoubtedly promote the production and aggregation of Aβ [37,38]. The vicious crosstalk between dysfunctional microglia and Aβ further aggravates AD progression. Taken together, reversing neuroinflammation microenvironment and modulating activated microglia as well as reducing Aβ burden synchronously by ROS elimination and metal ion chelation is a promising multitasking strategy to break the feedback between Aβ and neuroinflammation for AD therapy.
Functional nanomaterials are emerging as new favorites as their smart utilization simplifies the entire drug delivery system while broadening functionality [39–41]. Very convincing evidence now supported the idea that functional nanomaterials show great potential as promising tools for AD treatment [35,42,43]. Although therapeutic agents can be delivered into the brain with the help of a nano size effect that increases blood–brain barrier (BBB) penetration [44,45], the AD locus selectivity was unsatisfactory. It was reported that periphery Aβ could be easily internalized into the brain mediated by the highly expressed advanced glycation end-product (RAGE) receptor in AD brain, which is closely related to the pathogenesis of neuronal dysfunction and death in AD [46,47]. A molecular modeling study indicated that RAGE interacts with the N-terminal of Aβ and transports Aβ from the blood to the brain [48]. Inspired by the transportation of Aβ, KLVFF peptide, derived from Aβ without interfering with normal interactions, was reported to be capable of acting as “a binding element” for selectively targeting the peripheral Aβ in AD patients [49,50]. Hence, utilization of Aβ peptide modification in AD therapy may be a promising strategy for enhancing pathological BBB penetration and lesion accumulation by Aβ hitchhiking.
Recently, dopamine-derived melanin-based polydopamine nanoparticles (PDA), which are highly biologically relevant to natural melanin, have been suggested as safe and potent antioxidants and metal chelators in biomedical applications [51,52]. To our knowledge, melanin-like nano-antioxidants or metal chelators have not been investigated in AD applications. Herein, based on complex etiologies in AD development, novel melanin-like metal ion chelators and neuroinflammation regulators (PDA@K) that reduce Aβ burden and normalize microglia dysfunctional synergistically through metal chelation and ROS scavenging were designed for AD therapy (Fig. 1). Given the low enrichment at the lesion site, PDA were modified with KLVFF peptides. PDA containing KLVFF could selectively target the peripheral Aβ in the AD model and achieved enhanced pathological BBB penetration by Aβ hitchhiking via highly expressed RAGE receptors. Once they enter the brain, PDA@K bind to amyloid plaques and greatly enriched at the lesion site, lowering the metal ion level and promoting amyloid plaque depolymerization. PDA@K endocytosed by lesion cells reduced ROS level and alleviated neuroinflammation. Effective Aβ targeting, pathological BBB crossing, and ROS scavenging capacity with excellent biocompatibility were demonstrated in vitro and in vivo. The modulated inflammatory microenvironment promoted microglial polarization and restored their critical functions of plaque clearance. This multifunctional strategy exhibited potent microglia modulation and neuroprotection in FAD4T transgenic mice, with improvement in memory and cognitive impairment. Our work proved the validity by directly using nanomaterials as anti-AD drugs, which, together with the prospect as biosafe nanocarriers for clinical AD drug delivery, greatly widen the application of nanomaterials for AD therapy.
PDA were fabricated using a classic method and optimum particle size was obtained by adjusting the pH of the reaction. Figure 1 elucidates the rational synthesis route as well as their further modification with Aβ-recognition peptide, abbreviated as PDA@K. Images from transmission electron microscopy (TEM) indicated that the PDA and PDA@K held monodispersed spherical structures with an average diameter of about 60 nm (Fig. 2A). After modification, the hydrodynamic size of PDA@K measured by dynamic light scattering (DLS) was about 90 nm (Fig. 2B). The minuscule particle size and narrow size distribution were beneficial for BBB penetration [53]. The zeta potentials of synthesized PDA and PDA@K were −33.10 ± 0.26 mV and −25.70 ± 0.82 mV, respectively (Fig. 2C). Considering strong ultraviolet (UV)–visible adsorption at 250 to 260 nm of phenylalanine residues (Phe, F, Fig. S3) [54], the UV spectrum of PDA@K and PDA was measured to verify the modification of the NH2-PEG-(Ac)KLVFF chain. The much higher UV absorption of PDA@K at 250 to 300 nm than that of PDA confirmed the successful integration of KLVFF fragments (Fig. 2D). The C-O-C stretching of PEG in the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectrum further verified the successful modification of the KLVFF peptide chain (Fig. 2E). Hydrodynamic diameters of these NPs were measured by DLS and showed no obvious changes for 7 days (Fig. 2F), indicating their good stability. After that, the metal ion chelating ability of PDA and PDA@K was tested using an inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES) and an atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS). KLVFF modification did not affect the chelating ability of NPs to metal ions. PDA and PDA@K all showed slightly different binding properties for Cu2+ (8.91 ± 1.17 μg/mg vs. 8.03 ± 1.11 μg/mg) and Zn2+ (7.66 ± 0.71 μg/mg vs. 7.56 ± 1.46 μg/mg) under the same conditions (Fig. 2G). In AD brains, the accumulation of copper and zinc observed was 5.7 and 3.1 times higher than that in normal brains, which clearly influenced Aβ aggregation [55]. The excellent Cu2+ and Zn2+ chelating ability of PDA offers great potential for AD therapy.
Considering the crucial role of ROS in the prevalence of AD, the scavenging capability of PDA to consume ROS was investigated systematically because of rich catechol structures on the PDA surface. Hydroxyl radicals (•OH), superoxide radicals (O2•−), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) were chosen to react with PDA to test their multiple ROS scavenging capability. As shown in Fig. 3A, PDA were highly sensitive to O2•−, and successfully scavenged 62.04 ± 3.86 % of O2•− at a concentration of 100 μg/ml. As PDA concentration increased, a concentration-dependent scavenging behavior toward O2•− was observed. •OH removal efficiency was evaluated by measuring the fluorescent signal of 2-hydroxyterephthalic acid. A dramatic decrease in fluorescence intensity (FI) around 425 nm was detected in the presence of PDA with different concentrations, confirming that PDA could efficiently eliminate •OH (Fig. 3B and Fig. S6). Since H2O2 had strong UV absorption at 240 nm, H2O2 scavenging ability was directly monitored by UV spectrum. The high fit (r = 0.9998) of H2O2 concentrations with UV signals at 240 nm verified the sensitivity of this approach (Fig. S7). After incubation with PDA, the UV peaks around 240 nm diminished gradually with increasing NP concentrations, which showed enhanced scavenging efficiency (Fig. 3C). In brief, the scavenging efficiency of PDA toward O2•−, •OH, and H2O2 all followed a concentration-dependent manner. These results confirmed admirable multiantioxidative activities of PDA toward various ROS in vitro.
Prior to the investigation of intracellular ROS removal ability of NPs, cytotoxicity and uptake kinetics toward NPs were essential parameters. Standard methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium (MTT) assay was carried out to determine viabilities of PC-12 cells toward PDA and PDA@K. No significant cytotoxicity induced by PDA and PDA@K was observed for all the groups (24 h and 48 h) even at a high concentration of 400 μg/ml (Fig. 3D and Fig. S8). Cellular uptake of PDA greatly increased at 100 μg/ml. Since there was no significant difference in cellular uptake between 100 μg/ml and 200 μg/ml, subsequent in vitro experiments were performed at 100 μg/ml (Fig. 3E). We further examined the protective effect of PDA and PDA@K on cells against ROS damage. PC-12 cells were pretreated with tert-butyl hydroperoxide (TBH) to mimic oxidative stress conditions. The FI of ROS+ cells, increased by TBH treatment (from 0.89% to 75.19%), was significantly reduced by the treatment of PDA and PDA@K (to 37.10% and 36.84%, respectively). PDA and PDA@K not only reduced ROS levels of positive control cells, but also significantly reduced cellular basal ROS levels (Fig. 3F and Fig. S9). The same conclusion was obtained from fluorescence microscopy (Fig. 3G). The ROS scavenging capacity of PDA was not affected after KLVFF modification. After 2 h of TBH treatment, cells became round and floated up, showing a dead state, while PDA and PDA@K treatment effectively prevented these damages. The cell morphology in TBH+PDA and TBH+PDA@K groups was the same as that of the phosphate buffered saline (PBS) group (Fig. S10). Taken together, PDA and PDA@K emerged as high-performance ROS scavengers for neuroprotection.
The excellent Cu2+ and Zn2+ chelating ability of PDA has been described in the previous section. Given the crucial roles of Cu2+ and Zn2+ in Aβ aggregation [23,56], the aggregation kinetics of Aβ42 were observed via thioflavin T (ThT) assay. The rapid increase of ThT FI with increasing metal ion concentrations confirmed the promoting effect of metal ions on Aβ aggregation (Fig. S11). ThT signals recorded in inhibition experiments indicated that NPs inhibited amyloid aggregate formation. Almost 90% reduction in ThT FI was measured when Aβ42 was cocultured with metal ions and PDA@K compared to the group added with metal ions alone (Fig. 4A). With the addition of NPs, a large number of preformed Aβ42 complexes were transformed into puncta (Fig. 4B). In disaggregation experiments, NPs were added into Aβ42 fibrils to verify their de-crosslinking effects. Under incubation with NPs, the ThT FI was remarkably decreased (Fig. 4C). The average FI in PDA groups was 29%, and the degree of fluorescence quenching was more pronounced in all the PDA@K groups, with only 19% remaining. All these results indicated that PDA@K exhibited splendid Aβ fibril inhibition and disaggregation effects in vitro. Considering the presence of serum proteins and a small amount of metal ions in vivo, we tested whether serum would affect the metal chelating ability of NPs. The in vitro results showed that incubation with serum for 24 h did not affect their inhibitory effect on Aβ42 aggregation in the presence of metal ions, laying the foundation for their application in vivo (Fig. S12). Aβ oligomers induce serious neurotoxicity by damaging hippocampal neurons through multiple mechanisms [57,58]. We then verified whether inhibiting Aβ42 aggregation could reduce the toxicity caused by Aβ at the cellular level. PC-12 cells were treated with Aβ42 (20 μmol/l), metal ions, and different NPs. Compared with those treated with Aβ42/PBS, the addition of metal ions further reduced cell viability, but increased when co-incubated with NPs, especially in the PDA@K group. Cell survival rate all surpassed 90% after incubating with PDA@K (Fig. 4D). These results together indicated that NPs, especially PDA@K, could effectively reduce Aβ-induced toxicity by inhibiting Aβ aggregation through metal chelation.
As resident macrophages of the brain, microglia have been shown to play a central role in Aβ clearance [59–61]. Herein, murine microglia BV2 was employed to evaluate the cellular uptake of Aβ. To check the targeting effect of PDA@K toward Aβ, BV2 cells were incubated with fluorescein-5-isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled Aβ42 and Rhodamine B (RB)-labeled NPs. The uptake of Aβ42 by BV2 was studied via flow cytometry (FCM). As shown in Fig. 4E, a strong increase in FITC-labeled Aβ42 signal within BV2 cells was observed after co-culture with PDA@K, suggesting that KLVFF-modified PDA were capable of capturing Aβ42 and promoting microglia uptake toward Aβ42. From the co-localization study, it was found that the green signals emitted by Aβ42 and the red signals emitted by PDA@K were almost totally co-localized in BV2 cells. Free Aβ cannot be easily endocytosed by microglia. This verified that PDA@K recognized Aβ42 and formed NPs-Aβ42 complexes, facilitating microglia to restore the capability of Aβ42 phagocytosis (Fig. 4F). Inspired by these promising results, we then evaluated the ability of NPs to promote Aβ phagocytosis by microglia in the presence of metal ions. As expected, after incubation of Aβ42 with metal ions, Aβ42 phagocytosis by BV2 significantly decreased since Aβ42 aggregation formed, but with the help of NPs, especially PDA@K, the uptake of Aβ42 significantly increased (Fig. 4G). The ThT and fluorescent microscope together with FCM results revealed that PDA@K could not only inhibit Aβ aggregation by their metal-chelating ability but also capture disaggregated Aβ and form NPs/Aβ complex to promote microglial uptake, which greatly reduce extracellular Aβ deposition and Aβ-induced toxicity.
Microglia can be protective (M2) or detrimental (M1) under different circumstances [62]. In AD brain, the deposition of Aβ is accompanied by the production of ROS, which leads to an inflammatory environment and promotes microglia dysfunction [63,64]. Improvement of the inflammatory environment contributes to microglia normalization. To determine whether PDA treatment could reprogram microglia toward the M2 phenotype, primary BV2 cells were first activated with TBH to mimic the inflammatory environment and verified via FCM. The expression of the M1-type marker CD86 increased with increasing TBH concentrations, indicating that the inflammatory environment indeed disturbed microglia homeostasis (Fig. S14). FCM and immunofluorescence staining results showed that PDA inhibited the activation of M1 microglia as characterized by the reduced expression of CD86 (M1 pro-inflammatory marker) (Fig. 5A and B). By contrast, they promoted the polarization of M2-type microglia as indicated by the increased expression of CD206 (M2 anti-inflammatory marker) (Fig. 5C and D). In the pro-inflammatory M1 state, microglia secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines, which further cause ROS accumulation and neuronal apoptosis. When transformed to an anti-inflammatory state, M2 microglia enhance neural regeneration by producing beneficial neurotrophins and anti-inflammatory cytokines [62]. Benefitting from the satisfactory polarization capability of PDA, we further observed the downregulation of typical pro-inflammatory cytokine (TNF-α) and the upregulation of anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10 and TGF-β) in BV2 cells treated with PDA/PDA+TBH compared with the PBS/TBH group (Fig. 5E to G). These results demonstrated that the PDA core could promote the polarization of microglia into the neuroprotective M2-like phenotype.
Since BBB is a major challenge for brain drug delivery, BBB penetration is one of the pivotal indices of nanodrugs in clinical AD therapy [65,66]. To substantiate BBB permeability of the NPs, a normal in vitro BBB model was established by seeding bEnd.3 in the upper chamber and BV2 in the lower chamber (Fig. 6A). When the transendothelial electrical resistance (TEER) values of the bEnd.3 monolayer were greater than 180 Ω/cm2, the BBB barrier formed (Fig. 6B). In order to mimic the pathological condition in AD, bEnd.3 and BV2 cells in the transwell model were incubated with Aβ42 oligomer (5 μmol/l) for 24 h to form AD-mimetic BBB. Afterwards, low concentrations of Aβ42 (4.5 nM) were added to the upper chamber to simulate peripheral circulation of AD. PDA@K were first incubated with Aβ42 solution (4.5 nM) to check peripheral Aβ targeting of PDA@K. The decreasing fluorescence values indicated that PDA@K selectively target peripheral Aβ in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. S15). The expression of RAGE was then examined and found to be significantly elevated in both Aβ-induced bEnd.3 cells and AD transgenic mice brains (Fig. S16). To test whether PDA@K can enhance BBB crossing by Aβ hitchhiking in AD, NPs labeled with RB were then added into the upper inserts of the normal and AD-mimetic BBB models with or without low concentration of Aβ42 (4.5 nM) and incubated for 4 h. In AD-mimetic BBB, significantly enhanced FI in the PDA@K+low Aβ group was detected in the lower chamber (Fig. 6C). Meanwhile, BV2 endocytosis toward PDA@K was increased in AD-mimetic BBB with the addition of low concentration of Aβ42 (Figs. S17 and S18). However, this phenomenon was not observed in the PDA or normal BBB model group. The 3D fluorescent images of the bEnd.3 layer showed that the PDA@K+low Aβ group was more permeable than the other groups (Fig. 6D). These results suggested that PDA containing the KLVFF peptide could specifically penetrate pathological BBB in AD lesion, at least in part, attributed to Aβ hitchhiking via highly expressed RAGE in AD.
Given the transmembrane and Aβ affinity capabilities of PDA@K, we further investigated their biodistribution and brain accumulation in healthy and AD mice, respectively. To track the in vivo circulation, NPs were labeled with Cy5 dyes (Fig. S19) and investigated via whole-body fluorescence imaging. Notably, at the same time point, fluorescence signals of PDA@K in the brain in the AD group were much stronger than the other groups, while in sham-operation mice, the brain FI of PDA and PDA@K was similar, confirming that KLVFF coating was beneficial for specific pathological BBB penetration (Fig. 6E). At 24 h post injection, mice were sacrificed and both major organs (including heart, liver, spleen, lung, and kidney) and brain tissues were isolated for ex vivo imaging. Although high level of NPs was detected in livers, the brain FI of PDA@K in AD mice was much stronger than the other groups (Fig. 6F and H). According to semi-quantification of brain fluorescence (Fig. 6G), the brain accumulation of PDA@K was 1.92 times higher than that of PDA in AD mice. Afterwards, brains and organs were frozen-sliced to further observe the accumulation of NPs by confocal imaging (Fig. 6I and Fig. S20). The brain FI of PDA@K in the AD group was stronger than that of other groups, which was basically in line with the above results. In summary, Aβ recognition by PDA@K facilitated their passage through pathological BBB and thus achieved AD brain targeting, which was in accordance with the in vitro BBB penetration results.
To evaluate the therapeutic effect of NPs for AD, the FAD4T transgenic mice model was assessed in behavioral tests to study their preventive effect on learning and memory impairment relevant to AD. The FAD4T transgenic mouse is a multitransgenic AD model that expresses the Swedish and Indiana mutated APP gene and the PSEN1 gene with M146V and L286V mutations. Compared to the commonly used transgenic AD model, FAD4T mice express accelerated amyloid deposition (1.5 months) and microglia activation (1.5 months) with obvious memory deficits (5 month), demonstrating suitability and reliability for evaluating the therapeutic efficacy of NPs in this novel model. According to the workflow in Fig. 7A, 5-month-old FAD4T male mice were randomly grouped and injected with NPs through the tail vein 7 times every 3 days. Five percent glucose-injected FAD4T and control wild-type (WT) mice groups were included to assess AD-relevant deficits in FAD4T mice at baseline. The spatial memory ability and behavioral execution in FAD4T mice were assessed by Morris water maze (MWM) and nest-building test. In the MWM test, AD mice showed obvious learning deficits during the 4 training days (Fig. 7B). On the probe test day, the swimming paths of mice in AD group displayed aimless searching strategy with little improved spatial learning ability, whereas the trajectories of mice after treatment mostly revolved around the platform, especially in the PDA@K group (Fig. 7C). With the same swimming speed, FAD4T mice treated with PDA@K showed improved spatial learning and memory with reduced time to reach the target platform and increased number of platform crossings compared to the 5% glucose-injected groups (Fig. 7D to F). In the nest-building test, PDA@K-treated FAD4T mice achieved a similar score to the WT group, which was much better than the other FAD4T groups (Fig. 7G and H). This also proved that PDA@K could effectively improve the behavior execution ability of FAD4T mice. In addition, we evaluated the therapeutic effect in the Aβ-injected AD model. Behavioral observation including the novel object recognition test and MWM were carried out to examine spatial learning and memory ability. Experimental nesting data showed that Aβ-injected AD mice revealed suppressed interest to novel objects compared with WT mice as determined by the recognition index for novel objects (Fig. S22). After being treated with PDA@K, AD mice showed an obvious preference for novel objects as WT controls. AD mice treated with non-KLVFF-modified PDA performed not so well as PDA@K-treated mice, signifying the importance of the joint action of Aβ recognition peptide and PDA. The same conclusion was obtained in MWM performed at the Aβ-injected AD model (Fig. S23). All the above data confirmed that PDA@K were able to ameliorate the cognitive deficits in AD mice commendably via the joint performance of Aβ recognition by KLVFF and both ROS and metal ion removal by PDA.
After behavioral evaluation, mice were sacrificed and tissues were collected for further analysis. Both FCM and fluorescent microscope results showed that the ROS level in the brain of FAD4T mice were significantly higher than that of WT mice, while it was dramatically reduced in those receiving NPs treatment, especially the PDA@K group (Fig. 8A and B). In order to explore the effect of NPs on Aβ deposition, Aβ immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence staining were adopted to detect the quantity of amyloid plaques. As shown in Fig. 8C and D, abundant Aβ plaques were located in the cortex and hippocampus of FAD4T mice, which was in stark contrast to the WT mice, but the amount and size of Aβ plaques were greatly decreased after treatment. The Aβ plaques in the PDA@K-treated group were almost invisible and close to the level of WT mice, indicating that PDA@K administration was effective in reducing Aβ plaques in brain. Abnormal microglia activation is one of the typical pathological features in AD patients [11,34]. Surprisingly, the M1 marker CD86 expression was downregulated in FAD4T transgenic mice after PDA@K treatment, and M2 marker CD206 expression was upregulated (Fig. 8E to G). In addition, decreased secretion of the pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α and IL-6) and increased expression of the anti-inflammatory cytokines (TGF-β and IL-10) also confirmed the modulation of activated microglia (Fig. 8H to K). These illustrated that PDA@K could reduce excessive ROS, relieve Aβ burden, and stimulate microglial polarization, thereby normalizing the lesion microenvironment in AD brain. Encouraged by the promising pathological features above, we further evaluated neuroprotective performance of NPs morphologically using Nissl staining and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. The CA1 and CA3 area in the hippocampus were often used for memory study and were prone to lesions [67]. As expected, marked nuclear shrinkage and neuronal damage were observed in FAD4T mice, but not found in WT group. Contrastingly, NPs treatment, especially PDA@K, prominently attenuated the damage of nerve cells (Fig. 8L). The H&E staining of the hippocampus was consistent with the Nissl results (Fig. 8M). We later validated neuroprotective effect at the protein level. Western blot analysis was performed to detect BDNF levels, a protein that proved to be strongly correlated with neuronal repair [68]. The obvious increment of BDNF levels in the PDA@K-treated mice brains indicated that PDA@K treatment could restore BDNF production of AD mice (Fig. 8N and Fig. S24). Furthermore, we found that inflammatory-related proteins such as NF-κB p65 and IKB-α were reduced in the NPs-treated group, especially that treated with PDA@K (Fig. 8O and Fig. S24). Similarly, in the Aβ-injection AD model, obvious ROS removal, microglia polarization, and neuroprotection were also observed after PDA@K treatment (Figs. S25 and S26).
To further understand the therapeutic mechanism of NPs after administration, we evaluated the transcriptomic features of brains of FAD4T mice treated with PDA and PDA@K. The heatmap plot included the differentially expressed genes among the FAD4T, FAD4T+PDA, and FAD4T+PDA@K groups (Fig. 9A). After treatment with PDA@K, a total of 1,939 genes were substantially differentially expressed compared with the FAD4T group, of which 997 transcripts were upregulated (red dots) and 942 genes were downregulated (blue dots) (Fig. 9B). The number of differential genes in the PDA@K-treated group was substantially higher than that in the PDA-treated group. Cluster analysis of expressed genes showed that PDA@K treatment had greatly changed the expression patterns of FAD4T mice brains. Through Gene Ontology (GO) analysis, most of the differentially expressed genes were found to enrich in the categories of the nervous system development, gliogenesis, metal ion homeostasis, inflammatory response, and memory (Fig. 9C). Neuro-related GO terms, for example, nervous system development, generation of neurons, and neurogenesis, were remarkably regulated. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis further provided the significantly enriched signaling pathways that are related to AD, such as neuroactive ligand–receptor interaction, circadian entrainment, and dopaminergic synapse (Fig. 9D). Neuroactive ligand–receptor interaction, one of the significantly enriched pathways, has been well documented to be associated with AD. Research had identified its responsibility for regulating the process of neuronal communication, which is crucial for learning and memory [69]. Circadian clock plays a crucial role in neurological diseases. It is reported that regulation of circadian entrainment can control Aβ formation through chronotherapy, thereby alleviating symptoms of AD and inflammatory diseases [70]. Also, the enriched Notch signaling pathway and the mammalian target of rapamycin signaling pathway participated in the pathogenesis and progression of AD and were reported to be compelling targets for AD [71–74]. These data indicated that the therapeutic effect of PDA@K on AD was attributed to the regulation of multiple signaling pathways.
Lastly, systemic toxicity of NPs was evaluated. Hemolytic assay revealed that no obvious hemolysis occurred after 24 h of co-incubation (Fig. S27), indicating the overall safety of NPs in vitro. Compared with the WT group, there were no remarkable changes in body weight of the other groups during treatment (Fig. S28). After treatment, major organs including hearts, livers, spleens, lungs, and kidneys from all groups were dissected and stained with H&E. Few differences were noted among these groups (Figs. S29A and S30A). To further assess the systemic response to the NPs, routine blood parameters and chemistry were assessed, including alkaline phosphatase, plasma alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, creatinine, uric acid, and plasma urea, as well as the numbers of leukocytes, neutrophils, lymphocytes, erythrocytes, platelets, and hemoglobin. The liver and kidney functions of mice in each group were in the safe range with no significant difference versus WT mice (Figs. S29B to G and S30B to G). The number of leukocytes, neutrophils, and lymphocytes were all elevated in AD mice, which demonstrate that high levels of inflammation do exist in AD. Surprisingly, all these elevated inflammatory cells returned to the normal range after PDA@K treatment (Fig. S29H to J). This again demonstrated the promising anti-inflammatory effect of PDA@K, and that ROS removal has been proposed as one of the central targets for AD therapy. No other marked changes were found in routine blood parameters (Fig. S29K to M). Taken together, the NPs applied in this study showed good biocompatibility and possessed great potential for clinical applications.
AD is a complex neurodegenerative disorder, and the pathological pathways that govern AD are believed to be mutually reinforced [2]. The sophisticated nature of brain microenvironment and the intricate pathogenesis indicated that single target therapeutics for the rescue of neuronal function is not enough to alleviate the cognitive deficits in AD model mice or AD patients [31,32]. Accordingly, we proposed that multifunctional therapeutics, which can target the pathological BBB, reduce Aβ burden, repolarize microglia, and thus normalize brain microenvironment, would provide a promising alternative to AD treatment. To test this hypothesis, we developed multifunctional biomimetic melanin-like metal ion-chelators PDA@K composed of Aβ recognition peptide KLVFF and synthetic melanin-like nanoparticles PDA to achieve pathological BBB penetration and microenvironment remodeling. As a result, PDA@K had high affinity toward Aβ, were able to hitch a ride on Aβ, and showed enhanced BBB permeation and preference in AD lesion mediated by highly expressed RAGE. PDA@K exhibited strong efficacy in relieving Aβ burden, recovering neuroinflammation, and improving the hippocampal-dependent recognition and spatial memory deficits in AD.
Effective BBB penetration is a big challenge for brain disease therapies. Nanomaterials have been widely explored for enhancing the efficacy of AD therapy due to their nano size effect that increases BBB penetration. However, the pathologically selective BBB crossing strategy still needs to be strengthened as the enhanced penetration only occurred at the lesion site and can be used to achieve precise treatment [75,76]. Inspired by the transport of peripheral Aβ into the brain in AD, the feature of highly expressed RAGE in AD pathology was clearly exploited and combined with Aβ-targeting peptide. By design, our PDA@K-incorporated KLVFF peptide makes it possible to recognize peripheral Aβ, enhancing the delivery of PDA@K across pathological BBB via Aβ hitchhiking mediated by RAGE. In addition to excellent blood stability and effective pathological BBB penetration, we also showed that PDA@K exert high brain accumulation in the AD model, which is a great advancement in AD therapy.
Nanotechnology-based therapy has been monitored under stringent regulatory framework. Clinical translation of nanomedicines requires consideration of multiple factors, including physical and chemical stability, manufacturing, route of administration, distribution, safety, appropriate animal studies, and so on [77]. In our study, the synthetic process of PDA@K is simple and green without high temperature or pressure, which can be adapted to mass production. We demonstrated that our nanomedicine has superior physiological stability and blood longevity that is critical for high accumulation at diseased sites. PDA@K exhibited excellent biocompatibility and did not cause renal or hepatic responses or adverse effects, suggesting that there is an effective clearance of by-products from the body. Our previous study has shown that nanomedicine could be eliminated from brain, resulting in good biosafety [78]. The simple and controllable synthetic route and excellent safety hold promise for clinical translation. In addition, the intrinsically effective functions of bioactive PDA-metal chelation and ROS scavenging were utilized for AD therapy, which simplifies the entire drug delivery system. Our work inspired the possibility of exploring functional nanomaterials that are directly used as anti-AD drugs rather than just acting as nanocarriers. In future studies, the functional PDA@K could be applied to carry multiple clinical drugs for AD treatment.
The cascade reactions triggered by the exacerbation of inflammatory microenvironment in AD brain are gaining attention. The overactivation of microglia in AD lesions affects the degradation of toxic proteins, and worse still, active microglia release inflammatory factors and promote ROS generation, which accelerates neuronal necrosis [11,62]. The increasingly prominent role of microglia dysfunction in AD allowed the restoration of microglial homeostasis to be taken into consideration of therapeutic strategies. In summary, based on complex etiologies in AD development, the multifunctional melanin-like metal ion chelators were reported here to reduce Aβ burden and normalize inflammatory microenvironment synergistically through its intrinsic capacity. The KLVFF peptide could not only enhance pathological BBB permeation but also capture disaggregated Aβ to promote microglial uptake of extracellular Aβ. The bioactive PDA chelated metal ions to accelerate Aβ depolymerization, which, together with their powerful ROS scavenging ability, reduced neuroinflammation and normalized brain microenvironment. On the one hand, they reduced the Aβ-related neurotoxicity, and on the other hand, the normalized conditions accelerated microglia to degrade Aβ. These positive pathophysiological effects contributed to the restoration of cognitive performance of PDA@K-treated FAD4T transgenic mice. Collectively, our study provided convincing evidence for considering metal dyshomeostasis and inflammatory microenvironment as therapeutic targets of AD, which could be considered as a novel multi-pronged strategy in the exploration of AD treatments.
Dopamine hydrochloride and ThT were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co., LLC (USA). KLVFF peptide chain was synthesized by Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). NH2-PEG-CH2CH2COOH, NH2-PEG-SH and Cy5 NHS ester were purchased from Dalian Meilun Biotech Co., Ltd. (Dalian, China). 2′,7′-Dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) was obtained from Bide Pharmatech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Complete RPMI-1640, Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), trypsin-EDTA solutions, and fetal bovine serum (FBS) were purchased from Gibco (USA). Amyloid-β (1–42) peptide (Aβ42) and FITC-amyloid-β (1–42) peptide (FITC-Aβ42) were purchased from GL Biochem Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Anti-beta amyloid antibody (ab201060) and anti-IKB alpha antibody (ab32518) were purchased from Abcam (UK). NF-κB p65 antibody was obtained from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. (USA). BDNF antibody was obtained from ABclonal Technology Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China). Anti-CD206 and -CD86 antibodies were obtained from Proteintech Group, Inc. (Wuhan, China). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (TNF-α, IL-6, IL-10, and TGF-β) were purchased from BD Pharmingen (USA). All the chemicals used were analytical or reagent grade.
The bEnd.3, BV2, and PC-12 cell lines were obtained from the Chinese Academy of Sciences Cell Bank (Shanghai, China). Cells were cultured in complete RPMI-1640 or DMEM containing 10% FBS and 100 U/ml penicillin–streptomycin and retained in an incubator at 37 °C and 5% CO2. BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Chengdu Dashuo Lab. Animal Co., Ltd. (Chengdu, China). FAD4T [B6/JGpt-Tg(Thy-APP/Thy-PSEN1)5/Gpt] mice were provided by the Gempharmatech Co., Ltd (Jiangsu, China). All animals were maintained under standard housing conditions. All animal experiments were carried out under the guidelines approved by the experimental animal management committee of Sichuan University.
PC-12 cells (1× 105 cells per well) were planted in 12-well plates and incubated with 100 μg/ml PDA or PDA@K for 24 h after grown to 70% to 80% confluence. The positive controls were treated with TBH for 6 h. After that, the medium was replaced with FBS-free medium containing 10 μmol/l DCFH-DA in each well and incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. Then, cells were harvested and washed with PBS 3 times to fully remove excessive DCFH-DA. The FI was analyzed using a flow cytometer (Agilent NovoCyte, USA).
For fluorescent microscope analysis, PC-12 cells were planted into the coverslip in 12-well plates and treated the same as the FCM assay. After receiving DCFH-DA treatment, the cells were washed with PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and stained by 4', 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (1 μg/ml). The DCFH-DA FI was imaged by a fluorescence microscope (Leica, DMi8, Germany).
The concentrated ThT solution (2 mmol/l) and Aβ42 (1 mg/ml) dissolved in PBS were prepared in advance. For each measurement, the prepared Aβ42 solutions with or without NPs and metal ions were co-incubated with ThT solutions in glycine/NaOH (90 mmol/l, pH 8.5) to the final concentration of 20 μmol/l for Aβ42 and 20 μmol/l for ThT. The molar ratio of Aβ42/samples was 1/2. The mixtures were added to 96-well plates at 200 μl per well. After 24 h incubation with shaking at 60 rpm at 37 °C, the ThT FI was measured with a microplate reader (Ex: 440 nm, Em: 485 nm).
The inhibition and disaggregation of Aβ experiments were performed to study the effect of NPs on metal-induced Aβ fibril aggregation. Aβ42 monomers (10 μmol/l) were incubated with different concentrations of Zn2+ or Cu2+ for testing the effect of metal ions on Aβ aggregation. In the inhibition study, Zn2+ or Cu2+ metal ions were added into Aβ42 solution (10 μmol/l) at the final concentration of 400 ng/ml. PDA and PDA@K were introduced respectively at a concentration of 0.4 mg/ml and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. In the disaggregation experiment, Aβ42 was incubated for 24 h in PBS firstly at 37 °C to form Aβ fibers (Aβ42(24h)). Then, PDA and PDA@K (0.4 mg/ml) were introduced into pre-incubated Aβ42(24h) solution (10 μmol/l), respectively. The samples were cultured for 24 h at 37 °C. The effects of Aβ42 fibril inhibition and disaggregation were confirmed by ThT fluorescence assay. In order to verify whether serum affected the metal chelating ability of NPs and thus hindered their inhibitory effect on Aβ42 aggregation, PDA and PDA@K were incubated with mouse serum for 24 h at 37 °C and recycled. After that, the serum-incubated NPs (0.4 mg/ml) were mixed with Aβ42 solution (10 μmol/l) with or without metal ions for 24 h at 37 °C. The degree of Aβ aggregation was observed by ThT assay.
In the BBB mimetic model, bEnd.3 cells were seeded in the upper chambers [79] (12 well, pore size: 3 μm, Corning, USA). The culture medium was replaced every day and the TEER values of the bEnd.3 layer were recorded every 2 days (Millicell-ERS, Millipore, USA). After the TEER value reached 180 Ω/cm2, 8×104 BV2 cells were seeded per well in the lower chamber. Two days later, new medium containing Aβ (5 μmol/l) was added into corresponding wells for 24 h. Then, the medium was removed and washed with PBS twice. RB-labeled NPs (100 μg/ml) with or without low concentration Aβ (4.5 nM) were added into the upper inserts. After 4 h of incubation, the FI of each lower chamber supernatant was detected via a microplate reader. The mean FI of RB in BV2 cells was detected using FCM and a confocal microscope. 3D confocal microscopic imaging was used to observe the penetration of NPs in the bEnd.3 layer.
The Aβ-injection AD model was established according to the published methods [80]. Aβ42 (1 mg/ml) was pre-incubated in artificial cerebrospinal fluid at 37 °C for 7 days. Mice were anesthetized and fixed on a brain stereotactic fixation device for surgery. Pre-incubated Aβ42 (5 μl) was slowly injected into the right hippocampal region. After 2 weeks of recovery, AD mice were randomly grouped and sham-operated mice were used as healthy control. One hundred microliters of Cy5-labeled NPs (PDA and PDA@K, 30 mg/kg) were administrated intravenously at the same concentration of Cy5. At 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h post-administration, mice were anesthetized and imaged using the Lumina III Imaging System (PerkinElmer, USA). At 24 h, the mice were sacrificed, and their major organs and brains were separated for ex vivo fluorescence imaging. After that, the organs and brains were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, dehydrated in sucrose, embedded by tissue-tek O.C.T compound (Sakura Finetek, USA), and then sectioned (Leica CM1950, Germany). All the slices were stained with DAPI (1 μg/ml) and observed under a confocal microscope.
Five-month-old FAD4T transgenic mice were randomly divided into 3 groups, 5% Glucose, PDA, and PDA@K (10 mice per group). The same number of WT C57BL/6 mice were used as healthy control group. Five percent glucose and NPs (PDA and PDA@K, 30 mg/kg) were intravenously administered once every 3 days for 7 doses, respectively. The body weights were recorded every 3 days for toxicity assessment. After treatment, all mice were trained and tested in a water maze with a diameter of 80 cm to evaluate spatial learning and memory ability. In detail, the maze was filled with water and replaced daily. The water temperature was maintained at 20 ± 1 °C. A circular platform (10 cm in diameter) was immobilized to 1 cm under the water surface during the training period and a camera detection device was used for tracing movement. In the first 4 days, all mice were trained to swim to find the platform from 3 diverse positions around the border of the maze. If the mice found the hidden platform within 60 s successfully, they were allowed to stay on the platform for 10 s. If they failed, the mice were guided to the platform and placed there for 10 s. After training for 4 days, the platform was removed and the spatial probe test was carried out. Every trained mouse was allowed to swim freely for 60 s. The latency to reach the platform, the time spent in the target quadrant where the platform used to be, and the number of initial platform crossings were recorded for spatial memory evolution.
The mice were housed one mouse per cage and placed in the test lab for adaption to 48 h. Then, 10 pieces of thin paper (5 × 5 cm) were introduced in the cage to provide conditions for mice to build nests. Twenty-four hours later, the nests were photographed and scored to assess nest-building behavior. The nest scores were based on the following criteria: (a) no obvious nest sites, and the paper was not torn; (b) the paper was not torn obviously, but the nest site was identifiable; (c) partially torn paper with identifiable nest sites; and (d) most of the paper towels were bitten with identifiable nest sites. All results were scored blindly.
After behavioral experiment, mice blood was collected before execution for routine blood parameter and chemistry analysis. The mice brains were isolated and the cross-sections of the hippocampus of some brains were selected for immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence staining, ROS staining, Nissl, and H&E staining, respectively. Some mice brain tissues were ground to collect single cells for FCM analysis of CD86, CD206 expression, and the level of ROS detection. Transcriptomics analysis of some mice brains was performed by the BioNovoGene (Suzhou, China). The hippocampal tissues in some brains were homogenized by a high-speed tissue grinder (Servicebio, Wuhan, China) to perform Western blot and ELISA. The major organs including hearts, livers, spleens, lungs, and kidneys were sectioned and stained with Nissl and H&E to check the cumulative toxicity of NPs in vivo.
Statistical analysis was obtained with GraphPad Prism (version 8, CA). Data were expressed as mean ± SD, and analyzed by 2-sided unpaired Student’s t test with significance defined as *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, compared with control. Data were representative of 3 dependent experiments.
1.
Hampel H, Au R, Mattke S, van der Flier WM, Aisen P, Apostolova L, Chen C, Cho M, De Santi S, Gao P, et al.Designing the next-generation clinical care pathway for Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Aging. 2022;2:692–703.
2.
Knopman DS, Amieva H, Petersen RC, Chetelat G, Holtzman DM, Hyman BT, Nixon RA, Jones DT. Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021;7:Article 33.
3.
Alzheimer’s Disease International, World Alzheimer Report 2019. London (UK): Alzheimer’s Disease International; 2019.
4.
Scheltens P, De Strooper B, Kivipelto M, Holstege H, Chetelat G, Teunissen CE, Cummings J, van der Flier WM. Alzheimer's disease. Lancet. 2021;397(10284):1577–1590.
5.
Selkoe DJ. Treatments for Alzheimer's disease emerge. Science. 2021;373(6555):624–626.
6.
Wu Y-T, Beiser AS, Breteler MMB, Fratiglioni L, Helmer C, Hendrie HC, Honda H, Ikram MA, Langa KM, Lobo A, et al.The changing prevalence and incidence of dementia over time—Current evidence. Nat Rev Neurol. 2017;13(6):327–339.
7.
Liu P-P, Xie Y, Meng X-Y, Kang J-S. History and progress of hypotheses and clinical trials for Alzheimer's disease. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2019;4:1–22.
8.
Long JM, Holtzman DM. Alzheimer disease: An update on pathobiology and treatment strategies. Cell. 2019;179(2):312–339.
9.
Heneka MT, Carson MJ, El Khoury J, Landreth GE, Brosseron F, Feinstein DL, Jacobs AH, Wyss-Coray T, Vitorica J, Ransohoff RM, et al.Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14(4):388–405.
10.
Karran E, De Strooper B. The amyloid hypothesis in Alzheimer disease: New insights from new therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2022;21(4):306–318.
11.
Leng F, Edison P. Neuroinflammation and microglial activation in Alzheimer disease: Where do we go from here? Nat Rev Neurol. 2021;17(3):157–172.
12.
Liu Y, Nguyen M, Robert A, Meunier B. Metal ions in Alzheimer's disease: A key role or not? Acc Chem Res. 2019;52(7):2026–2035.
13.
Brosseron F, Maass A, Kleineidam L, Ravichandran KA, Gonzalez PG, McManus RM, Ising C, Santarelli F, Kolbe CC, Hasler LM, et al.Soluble TAM receptors sAXL and sTyro3 predict structural and functional protection in Alzheimer's disease. Neuron. 2022;110(6):1009–1022.
14.
Heppner FL, Ransohoff RM, Becher B. Immune attack: The role of inflammation in Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015;16(6):358–372.
15.
Henstridge CM, Hyman BT, Spires-Jones TL. Beyond the neuron-cellular interactions early in Alzheimer disease pathogenesis. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2019;20(2):94–108.
16.
Wolozin B, Ivanov P. Stress granules and neurodegeneration. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2019;20(11):649–666.
17.
Toppala S, Ekblad LL, Tuisku J, Helin S, Johansson JJ, Laine H, Loyttyniemi E, Marjamaki P, Blennow K, Zetterberg H, et al.Association of early beta-amyloid accumulation and neuroinflammation measured with [(11)C]PBR28 in elderly individuals without dementia. Neurology. 2021;96(12):e1608–e1619.
18.
Jung M, Lee S, Park S, Hong J, Kim C, Cho I, Sohn HS, Kim K, Park IW, Yoon S, et al.A therapeutic Nanovaccine that generates anti-amyloid antibodies and amyloid-specific regulatory T cells for Alzheimer's disease. Adv Mater. 2022;35(3):Article e2207719.
19.
Zhao YP, Tian SY, Zhang J, Cheng X, Huang WP, Cao GL, Chang Y-Z, Wang H, Nie GJ, Qiu W. Regulation of neuroinflammation with GLP-1 receptor targeting nanostructures to alleviate Alzheimer's symptoms in the disease models. Nano Today. 2022;44:Article 101457.
20.
Lu Y, Guo Z, Zhang Y, Li C, Zhang Y, Guo Q, Chen Q, Chen X, He X, Liu L, et al.Microenvironment remodeling micelles for Alzheimer's disease therapy by early modulation of activated microglia. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2019;6(4):Article 1801586.
21.
Wang H, Yang F, Zhang S, Xin R, Sun Y. Genetic and environmental factors in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases and promising therapeutic intervention via fecal microbiota transplantation. NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2021;7(1):Article 70.
22.
Han Y, Yi H, Wang Y, Li Z, Chu X, Jiang JH. Ultrathin zinc selenide nanoplatelets boosting photoacoustic imaging of in situ copper exchange in Alzheimer's disease mice. ACS Nano. 2022;16(11):19053–19066.
23.
Faller P, Hureau C, La Penna G. Metal ions and intrinsically disordered proteins and peptides: From cu/Zn amyloid-beta to general principles. Acc Chem Res. 2014;47(8):2252–2259.
24.
Lee M, Wang T, Makhlynets OV, Wu Y, Polizzi NF, Wu H, Gosavi PM, Stohr J, Korendovych IV, DeGrado WF, et al.Zinc-binding structure of a catalytic amyloid from solid-state NMR. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(24):6191–6196.
25.
Pedersen JT, Teilum K, Heegaard NH, Østergaard J, Adolph H-W, Hemmingsen L. Rapid formation of a preoligomeric peptide-metal-peptide complex following copper(II) binding to amyloid beta peptides. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2011;50(11):2532–2535.
26.
Cheignon C, Tomas M, Bonnefont-Rousselot D, Faller P, Hureau C, Collin F. Oxidative stress and the amyloid beta peptide in Alzheimer's disease. Redox Biol. 2018;14:450–464.
27.
Reybier K, Ayala S, Alies B, Rodrigues JV, Bustos Rodriguez S, La Penna G, Collin F, Gomes CM, Hureau C, Faller P. Free superoxide is an intermediate in the production of H2O2 by copper(I)-Aβ peptide and O2. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2016;55(3):1085–1089.
28.
Du C, Feng W, Dai X, Wang J, Geng D, Li X, Chen Y, Zhang J. Cu(2+)-Chelatable and ROS-scavenging MXenzyme as NIR-II-triggered blood-brain barrier-crossing nanocatalyst against Alzheimer's disease. Small. 2022;18(39):Article e2203031.
29.
Liu R, Yang J, Qiu X, Ji W, Shen J, Li Y, Lu Z, Wu Y, Wang W, Wang J, et al."Cascaded rocket" nanosystems with spatiotemporal separation for triple-synergistic therapy of Alzheimer's disease. Adv Healthc Mater. 2022;11(11):Article e2101748.
30.
Yang H, Mu W, Wei D, Zhang Y, Duan Y, Gao J-X, Gong X-Q, Wang HJ, Wu X-L, Tao H, et al.A novel targeted and high-efficiency nanosystem for combinational therapy for Alzheimer's disease. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2020;7(19):Article 1902906.
31.
Thambisetty M, Howard R, Glymour MM, Schneider LS. Alzheimer's drugs: Does reducing amyloid work? Science. 2021;374(6567):544–545.
32.
Panza F, Lozupone M, Logroscino G, Imbimbo BP. A critical appraisal of amyloid-β-targeting therapies for Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2019;15(2):73–88.
33.
Gosselin D, Skola D, Coufal NG, Holtman IR, Schlachetzki JCM, Sajti E, Jaeger BN, O'Connor C, Fitzpatrick C, Pasillas MP, et al.An environment-dependent transcriptional networkspecifies human microglia identity. Science. 2017;356(6344):Article eaal3222.
34.
Pascoal TA, Benedet AL, Ashton NJ, Kang MS, Therriault J, Chamoun M, Savard M, Lussier FZ, Tissot C, Karikari TK, et al.Microglial activation and tau propagate jointly across Braak stages. Nat Med. 2021;27(9):1592–1599.
35.
Xiao L, Wei F, Zhou Y, Anderson GJ, Frazer DM, Lim YC, Liu T, Xiao Y. Dihydrolipoic acid-gold nanoclusters regulate microglial polarization and have the potential to Alter neurogenesis. Nano Lett. 2020;20(1):478–495.
36.
Zhang H, Jiang W, Zhao Y, Song T, Xi Y, Han G, Jin Y, Song M, Bai K, Zhou J, et al.Lipoprotein-inspired nanoscavenger for the three-pronged modulation of microglia-derived neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease therapy. Nano Lett. 2022;22(6):2450–2460.
37.
Hong S, Beja-Glasser VF, Nfonoyim BM, Frouin A, Li S, Ramakrishnan S, Merry KM, Shi Q, Rosenthal A, Barres BA, et al.Complement and microglia mediate early synapse loss in Alzheimer mouse models. Science. 2016;352(6286):712–716.
38.
Venegas C, Kumar S, Franklin BS, Dierkes T, Brinkschulte R, Tejera D, Vieira-Saecker A, Schwartz S, Santarelli F, Kummer MP, et al.Microglia-derived ASC specks cross-seed amyloid-beta in Alzheimer's disease. Nature. 2017;552(7685):355–361.
39.
Liu R, Luo C, Pang Z, Zhang J, Ruan S, Wu M, Wang L, Sun T, Li N, Han LJCCL, et al.Advances of nanoparticles as drug delivery systems for disease diagnosis and treatment. Chin Chem Lett. 2022;34(2):Article 107518.
40.
Kwon Y-S, Zheng M, Zhang AY, Han Z. Melanin-like nanoparticles as an alternative to natural melanin in retinal pigment epithelium cells and their therapeutic effects against age-related macular degeneration. ACS Nano. 2022;16(11):19412–19422.
41.
Fu S, Chen H, Yang W, Xia X, Zhao S, Xu X, Ai P, Cai Q, Li X, Wang Y, et al.ROS-targeted depression therapy via BSA-incubated ceria nanoclusters. Nano Lett. 2022;22(11):4519–4527.
42.
Chen W, Ouyang J, Yi X, Xu Y, Niu C, Zhang W, Wang L, Sheng J, Deng L, Liu YN, et al.Black phosphorus nanosheets as a neuroprotective nanomedicine for neurodegenerative disorder therapy. Adv Mater. 2018;30(3):Article 1703458.
43.
Li L, He R, Yan H, Leng Z, Zhu S, Gu ZJNT. Nanotechnology for the diagnosis and treatment of Alzheimer's disease: A bibliometric analysis. Nano Today. 2022;47:Article 101654.
44.
Gao H. Progress and perspectives on targeting nanoparticles for brain drug delivery. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2016;6(4):268–286.
45.
Ruan S, Zhou Y, Jiang X, Gao H. Rethinking CRITID procedure of brain targeting drug delivery: Circulation, blood brain barrier recognition, intracellular transport, diseased cell targeting, internalization, and drug release. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2021;8(9):Article 2004025.
46.
Yan SD, Chen X, Fu J, Chen M, Zhu H, Roher A, Slattery T, Zhao L, Nagashima M, Morser J, et al.RAGE and amyloid-beta peptide neurotoxicity in Alzheimer's disease. Nature. 1996;382(6593):685–691.
47.
Deane R, Yan SD, Submamaryan RK, LaRue B, Jovanovic S, Hogg E, Welch D, Manness L, Lin C, Yu J, et al.RAGE mediates amyloid-beta peptide transport across the blood-brain barrier and accumulation in brain. Nat Med. 2003;9(7):907–913.
48.
Chaney MO, Stine WB, Kokjohn TA, Kuo Y-M, Esh C, Rahman A, Luehrs DC, Schmidt AM, Stern D, Yan SD, et al.RAGE and amyloid beta interactions: Atomic force microscopy and molecular modeling. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005;1741(1–2):199–205.
49.
Liu DC, Fu DJ, Zhang LB, Sun LM. Detection of amyloid-beta by Fmoc-KLVFF self-assembled fluorescent nanoparticles for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis. Chin Chem Lett. 2021;32(3):1066–1070.
50.
Ma M, Liu Z, Gao N, Pi Z, Du X, Ren J, Qu X. Self-protecting biomimetic nanozyme for selective and synergistic clearance of peripheral amyloid-beta in an Alzheimer's disease model. J Am Chem Soc. 2020;142(52):21702–21711.
51.
Liu Y, Ai K, Ji X, Askhatova D, Du R, Lu L, Shi J. Comprehensive insights into the multi-antioxidative mechanisms of melanin nanoparticles and their application to protect brain from injury in ischemic stroke. J Am Chem Soc. 2017;139(2):856–862.
52.
Zeng Y, Du X, Hou W, Liu XJ, Zhu C, Gao BB, Sun LD, Li QW, Liao JL, Levkin PA, et al.UV-triggered polydopamine secondary modification: Fast deposition and removal of metal nanoparticles. Adv Funct Mater. 2019;29(34):Article 1901875.
53.
Tsou YH, Zhang XQ, Zhu H, Syed S, Xu X. Drug delivery to the brain across the blood-brain barrier using nanomaterials. Small. 2017;13(43):Article 1701921.
54.
Zhao Y, Cai J, Liu Z, Li Y, Zheng C, Zheng Y, Chen Q, Chen H, Ma F, An Y, et al.Nanocomposites inhibit the formation, mitigate the neurotoxicity, and facilitate the removal of beta-amyloid aggregates in Alzheimer's disease mice. Nano Lett. 2019;19(2):674–683.
55.
Lovell MA, Robertson JD, Teesdale WJ, Campbell JL, Markesbery WR. Copper, iron and zinc in Alzheimer's disease senile plaques. J Neurol Sci. 1998;158(1):47–52.
56.
Barnham KJ, Bush AI. Biological metals and metal-targeting compounds in major neurodegenerative diseases. Chem Soc Rev. 2014;43(19):6727–6749.
57.
Ciudad S, Puig E, Botzanowski T, Meigooni M, Arango AS, Do J, Mayzel M, Bayoumi M, Chaignepain S, Maglia G, et al.Aβ(1-42) tetramer and octamer structures reveal edge conductivity pores as a mechanism for membrane damage. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):1–14.
58.
Small DH, Mok SS, Bornstein JC. Alzheimer's disease and Abeta toxicity: From top to bottom. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001;2(8):595–598.
59.
Duggan MR, Parikh V. Microglia and modifiable life factors: Potential contributions to cognitive resilience in aging. Behav Brain Res. 2021;405:Article 113207.
60.
Lei T, Yang Z, Xia X, Chen Y, Yang X, Xie R, Tong F, Wang X, Gao H. A nanocleaner specifically penetrates the blood–brain barrier at lesions to clean toxic proteins and regulate inflammation in Alzheimer's disease. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2021;11(12):4032–4044.
61.
Grubman A, Choo XY, Chew G, Ouyang JF, Sun G, Croft NP, Rossello FJ, Simmons R, Buckberry S, Landin DV, et al.Transcriptional signature in microglia associated with Aβ plaque phagocytosis. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):1–22.
62.
Prinz M, Jung S, Priller J. Microglia biology: One century of evolving concepts. Cell. 2019;179(2):292–311.
63.
Wang X, Su B, Siedlak SL, Moreira PI, Fujioka H, Wang Y, Casadesus G, Zhu X. Amyloid-beta overproduction causes abnormal mitochondrial dynamics via differential modulation of mitochondrial fission/fusion proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(49):19318–19323.
64.
Sebastian Monasor L, Muller SA, Colombo AV, Tanrioever G, Konig J, Roth S, Liesz A, Berghofer A, Piechotta A, Prestel M, et al.Fibrillar Abeta triggers microglial proteome alterations and dysfunction in Alzheimer mouse models. Elife. 2020;9:Article e54083.
65.
Terstappen GC, Meyer AH, Bell RD, Zhang W. Strategies for delivering therapeutics across the blood-brain barrier. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2021;20(5):362–383.
66.
Nance E, Pun SH, Saigal R, Sellers DL. Drug delivery to the central nervous system. Nat Rev Mater. 2022;7:314–331.
67.
Dong C, Madar AD, Sheffield MEJ. Distinct place cell dynamics in CA1 and CA3 encode experience in new environments. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):Article 2977.
68.
Martinelli S, Anderzhanova EA, Bajaj T, Wiechmann S, Dethloff F, Weckmann K, Heinz DE, Ebert T, Hartmann J, Geiger TM, et al.Stress-primed secretory autophagy promotes extracellular BDNF maturation by enhancing MMP9 secretion. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):Article 4643.
69.
Suzuki K, Elegheert J, Song I, Sasakura H, Senkov O, Matsuda K, Kakegawa W, Clayton AJ, Chang VT, Ferrer-Ferrer M, et al.A synthetic synaptic organizer protein restores glutamatergic neuronal circuits. Science. 2020;369(6507):Article eabb4853.
70.
Clark GT, Yu Y, Urban CA, Fu G, Wang C, Zhang F, Linhardt RJ, Hurley JM. Circadian control of heparan sulfate levels times phagocytosis of amyloid beta aggregates. PLoS Genet. 2022;18(2):Article e1009994.
71.
Woo H-N, Park J-S, Gwon A-R, Arumugam TV, Jo D-G. Alzheimer's disease and notch signaling. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;390(4):1093–1097.
72.
Bian W, Tang M, Jiang H, Xu W, Hao W, Sui Y, Hou Y, Nie L, Zhang H, Wang C, et al.Low-density-lipoprotein-receptor-related protein 1 mediates notch pathway activation. Dev Cell. 2021;56(20):2902–2919.
73.
Mencer S, Kartawy M, Lendenfeld F, Soluh H, Tripathi MK, Khaliulin I, Amal H. Proteomics of autism and Alzheimer's mouse models reveal common alterations in mTOR signaling pathway. Transl Psychiatry. 2021;11(1):Article 480.
74.
Singla R, Mishra A, Cao R. The trilateral interactions between mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling, the circadian clock, and psychiatric disorders: An emerging model. Transl Psychiatry. 2022;12(1):Article 355.
75.
Furtado D, Björnmalm M, Ayton S, Bush AI, Kempe K, Caruso F. Overcoming the blood-brain barrier: The role of nanomaterials in treating neurological diseases. Adv Mater. 2018;30:Article e1801362.
76.
He X, Wang X, Yang L, Yang Z, Yu W, Wang Y, Liu R, Chen M, Gao H. Intelligent lesion blood-brain barrier targeting nano-missiles for Alzheimer's disease treatment by anti-neuroinflammation and neuroprotection. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2022;12(4):1987–1999.
77.
Gadekar V, Borade Y, Kannaujia S, Rajpoot K, Anup N, Tambe V, Kalia K, Tekade RK. Nanomedicines accessible in the market for clinical interventions. J Control Release. 2021;330:372–397.
78.
Liu R, Jia W, Wang Y, Hu C, Yu W, Huang Y, Wang L, Gao H. Glymphatic system and subsidiary pathways drive nanoparticles away from the brain. Research (Wash D C). 2022;2022:Article 9847612.
79.
Cai L, Yang C, Jia W, Liu Y, Xie R, Lei T, Yang Z, He X, Tong R, Gao H. Endo/lysosome-escapable delivery depot for improving BBB transcytosis and neuron targeted therapy of Alzheimer's disease. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;30(27):Article 190999.
80.
Yang X, Yang W, Xia X, Lei T, Yang Z, Jia W, Zhou Y, Cheng G, Gao H. Intranasal delivery of BACE1 siRNA and rapamycin by dual targets modified nanoparticles for Alzheimer's disease therapy. Small. 2022;18(30):Article e2203182.
Year 2023 volume 6 Issue 6
PDF
86
45
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.34133/research.0180
  • Receive Date:2023-01-26
  • Online Date:2026-10-28
  • Published:2023-06-20
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2023-01-26
  • Accepted:2023-06-02
Affiliations
    1Key Laboratory of Drug-Targeting and Drug Delivery System of the Education Ministry, West China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P.R. China.
    2Laboratory of Molecular Translational Medicine, Center for Translational Medicine, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, Department of Pediatrics, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P.R. China.

Corresponding:

* Address correspondence to: (H.G.)
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/research/EN/10.34133/research.0180
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT