收藏切换
Polymerization-Induced Self-Assembly for Efficient Fabrication of Biomedical Nanoplatforms
收藏切换
PDF
Xiaopeng Zhao, Changrui Sun, Fei Xiong, Ting Wang, Sheng Li, Fengwei Huo, Xikuang Yao*
Research. Vol 6 Article ID 0113
Less
收藏切换
Research. Vol 6 Article ID 0113
• Review Article •
Polymerization-Induced Self-Assembly for Efficient Fabrication of Biomedical Nanoplatforms
Full
Xiaopeng Zhao, Changrui Sun, Fei Xiong, Ting Wang, Sheng Li, Fengwei Huo, Xikuang Yao*
Affiliations
  • School of Flexible Electronics (Future Technologies) and Institute of Advanced Materials (IAM), Nanjing Tech University (NanjingTech), Nanjing 211816, P. R. China.
Published: 2023-04-20 doi: 10.34133/research.0113
Outline
收藏切换

Amphiphilic copolymers can self-assemble into nano-objects in aqueous solution. However, the self-assembly process is usually performed in a diluted solution (<1 wt%), which greatly limits scale-up production and further biomedical applications. With recent development of controlled polymerization techniques, polymerization-induced self-assembly (PISA) has emerged as an efficient approach for facile fabrication of nano-sized structures with a high concentration as high as 50 wt%. In this review, after the introduction, various polymerization method-mediated PISAs that include nitroxide-mediated polymerization-mediated PISA (NMP-PISA), reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer polymerization-mediated PISA (RAFT-PISA), atom transfer radical polymerization-mediated PISA (ATRP-PISA), and ring-opening polymerization-mediated PISA (ROP-PISA) are discussed carefully. Afterward, recent biomedical applications of PISA are illustrated from the following aspects, i.e., bioimaging, disease treatment, biocatalysis, and antimicrobial. In the end, current achievements and future perspectives of PISA are given. It is envisioned that PISA strategy can bring great chance for future design and construction of functional nano-vehicles.

Xiaopeng Zhao, Changrui Sun, Fei Xiong, Ting Wang, Sheng Li, Fengwei Huo, Xikuang Yao. Polymerization-Induced Self-Assembly for Efficient Fabrication of Biomedical Nanoplatforms[J]. Research, 2023 , 6 (4) : 0113 - . DOI: 10.34133/research.0113
In recent years, nanoparticles (NPs) that can be precisely designed and manipulated have been applied in a range of fields including catalysis, energy storage and conversion, and drug delivery [1–7]. Polymeric NPs are appealing materials for biomedical applications owing to their excellent biocompatibility and tailorability. Particularly, amphiphilic copolymers can simultaneously self-assemble into various nanostructures in aqueous solution [8]. Notably, Zhang and Eisenberg first reported the self-assembly behavior of amphiphilic block copolymers (BCP) in solution in 1995 [9]. Since then, various NPs including spheres, worms, and vesicles have been discovered [10–12]. However, the process is usually performed in dilute solution (<1 wt%). The efficiency and reproducibility of the preparation of polymeric NPs are unpleasant. These above adverse defects greatly restrict the large-scale preparation of functional NPs and their applications. Therefore, it is quite demanding to find an alternative approach to prepare NPs efficiently.
Notably, polymerization-induced self-assembly (PISA) that combines polymerization and self-assembly in one pot has shown many distinct advantages, such as labor-saving, repeatability, and high solid concentration as high as 50 wt% [13–17]. By utilization of suitable solvent, soluble macroinitiator can be chain-extended by polymerization with the second monomers. As the polymerization proceeds, the second insoluble block gradually drives the self-assembly of polymer chains. Armes and coworkers summarized the PISA process under the different conditions [18,19]. The morphology of obtained NPs can be well regulated during the PISA process [20–22]. Notably, the morphology of self-assembled NPs can be finely tuned by adjusting the packing parameter (P). P can be given by the equation P = v/al, where a is the interfacial area of the hydrophilic block and v and l are the volume and length of the hydrophobic block, respectively. When P ≤ 1/3, amphiphilic BCPs usually self-assemble into spherical micelles. Worms can be obtained when 1/3 < P ≤ 1/2, while vesicles are formed when 1/2 < P ≤ 1. Interestingly, when P > 1, highly-ordered inverse structures (e.g., spongosome and cubosome) can be fabricated. Pan and Du reported that the PISA process has been succeeded by utilization of controlled polymerization techniques including nitroxide-mediated radical polymerization (NMP), atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP), reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization, and ring-opening polymerization (ROP) [23,24].
Due to fine control over the morphology and size of the prepared NPs, PISA has become a robust technique to fabricate NPs for various applications. As a new trend, growing functional groups have been gradually introduced into the PISA system to construct multifunctional nanoplatforms [25–28]. Notably, by incorporation of reactive groups, such as thiol group [29] and epoxy group [30], into hydrophilic chain or hydrophobic core, fabricated NPs can further conjugate with functional molecules. What is more, theranostic molecules, such as imaging agents, drugs, and proteins, can also be finely encapsulated during the self-assembly process, resulting in enhanced diagnostic and therapeutic effects. In addition, enzymes with catalytic effect can also be combined with polymeric nanoreactors to achieve biocatalysis and antimicrobial action. Recently, these polymeric NPs manufactured by PISA have been emerged in biomedical field.
Recently, PISA has been reviewed by Armes, O’Reilly, Pan, Yuan, Couturaud, and Du, as well as other groups from various perspectives [19,23,24,31–34]. Among these existing reviews, Pan and Du recently summarized the development of polymerization techniques in PISA [23,24]. Yuan and Armes focused on PISA by nonthermal initiation, which was beneficial to the loading of biomacromolecules [14,33]. Couturaud and Pan also reviewed the application of PISA for drug delivery [32,34]. However, none of them focused on the fabrication of nanoplatforms by PISA for biomedical applications. As an efficient tool to prepare functional NPs, fabricating biomedical nanoplatforms by PISA is worthy of much attention.
In this review, after the introduction, the principles and features of various PISA systems are demonstrated with depth (Fig. 1). Afterward, updated biomedical nanoplatforms built by PISA strategy are reviewed from 4 aspects, i.e., bioimaging, disease treatment, biocatalysis, and antimicrobial. In the end, some conclusions and perspectives for further development of PISA are elaborated carefully. It is believed that more and more fascinating polymeric nanoplatforms for other applications can be constructed by PISA in the future.
NMP is one of the earliest discovered reversible-deactivation radical polymerization (RDRP) techniques, and the reaction process can achieve controlled/active polymerization by the utilization of 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine (TEMPO) or its derivatives (Fig. 2). The first work about NMP-PISA was reported in 2005 by Charleux’s group [35]. Briefly, styrene (St) and n-butyl acrylate (BA) monomers were grafted from the end of N-tert-butyl-N-(1-diethyl phosphono-2,2-dimethyl propyl) nitroxide (SG1)-terminated poly(sodium acrylate) in water at 120 °C under 3 bar pressure of nitrogen. With the growth of hydrophobic chain, obtained amphiphilic BCPs self-assembled into spherical NPs in situ. The hydrodynamic diameter of polystyrene (PS) and poly(n-butyl acrylate) (PBA) particles was 65 and 90 nm, respectively. Notably, when pH was varied from 7 to 4, the diameters of PS NPs decreased to 55 nm and the diameters of PBA NPs decreased to 76 nm. Notably, the variation of the diameters was due to the collapse of hydrophilic corona after protonation. This pioneering work laid the foundation for future research.
Later in 2009, the same group first reported pH-sensitive vesicles, which were fabricated with high concentrations by NMP-PISA under emulsion condition [36]. Poly(sodium acrylate) macroalkoxyamine (PNaA-SG1) was used to polymerize with 4-vinylpyridine (4VP) monomers at pH 11, 120 °C under 3 bar pressure. Most monomers (>90%) were consumed within 4 h, as the polymerization proceeded, and spheres, wormlike micelles, and spherical vesicles were observed. When the pH decreased from 11 to 2, the milky solution became clear, ascribed to the protonation of poly(4-vinylpyridine) (P4VP) block. Therefore, these pH-sensitive vesicles could efficiently release encapsulated drugs once upon acid environment. However, the disadvantages of NMP also existed in the above PISA process including high reaction temperature, which was not beneficial to the encapsulation of biomolecules.
To simplify the NMP-PISA process, some pioneering works have been reported. For this purpose, water-soluble brush-type macroalkoxyamine initiator poly (poly (ethylene oxide) methyl ether methacrylate-co-styrene) was used to initiate emulsion polymerization of n-butyl methacrylate and St units at 85 °C [37]. The effect of the macroinitiator concentration, pH, and the salt concentration on the stability and morphology of self-assembled nano-objects were studied. If salt concentration was at 0 or 1 mM, spherical NPs tended to be obtained. When salt concentration was increased to 10 mM or even 100 mM, elongated micelles and vesicles appeared. It was explained that the polymer became more hydrophilic with increased ionic strength, which could induce the transformation of the morphology. Yoshida fabricated giant vesicles by NMP-PISA under room temperature (RT) and ultraviolet (UV) irradiation instead of heating [38,39].
In addition to the study of polymeric assemblies, NMP-PISA can also be used for the fabrication of polymer–inorganic hybrid systems [40]. For this purpose, macroalkoxyamine initiator was adsorbed on the surface of silica NPs to copolymerize with n-butyl methacrylate (BMA) and St units by NMP. As the hydrophobic block grew, amphiphilic BCPs self-assembled into various morphologies. Impressively, both the pH value and the size of silica NPs had important impact on the morphology of nanocomposites. Notably, by taking advantage of the cryo-transmission electron microscope (TEM) technique, the intermediate morphologies during the PISA process were captured, which was beneficial to understand the mechanism of the self-assembly behaviors.
Above all, although NMP-PISA has been explored for many years, the literatures that have been reported remain sparse as a result of stringent experimental conditions and uncommon agents. Meanwhile, the reported monomers for NMP-PISA are quite limited and possess poor biocompatibility and biodegradability.
Among the controllable radical polymerization techniques, RAFT polymerization has been considered as a robust method to prepare well-defined polymers with desired structure and molecular weight (MW). Generally, the polymerization process usually requires the usage of chain transfer agents (CTAs), such as dithioester derivatives [RC(=S)-Z]. In recent years, much effort has been used to develop RAFT-PISA [41,42]. In general, solvophilic macro-CTAs should be first synthesized as stabilizer block and chain-extended with the solvophobic block. With the increase of the solvophobic chain, amphiphilic BCPs self-assemble into NPs in situ.
In general, RAFT-PISA can be performed in various kinds of solvents, including polar solvents [43–48] and nonpolar solvents [49–54]. Also, there are abundant monomers that can be suitable for RAFT-PISA, such as vinyl-based monomers and methacrylates. In the following, RAFT-PISA will be introduced carefully according to initiation method.
Among all these RAFT-PISA systems, thermal initiation is the most well-established initiation method. Traditional initiators [e.g., 2,2'-azobisisobutyronitrile ( AIBN) or 4,4'-azobis(4-cyanovaleric acid) (ACVA)] can produce free radicals at high temperature (60 to 90 °C), which will initiate the polymerization process. Also, various kinds of amphiphilic copolymer-based NPs have been successfully fabricated by thermal-initiated RAFT-PISA in dispersion or emulsion condition [52,55–58]. The fabrication of these NPs can be predicted and guided by phase diagram [59,60].
Nowadays, ,many works were devoted to control the morphology of obtained NPs. In addition to the significant effects of solid content and chain length on the morphology of NPs, other factors such as monomer solubility, temperature, pH, and complementary hydrogen bonding interaction were also studied [61–65]. Very recently, the effect of host–guest complexation interaction on the morphology has attracted much attention. For example, Yuan and coworkers first achieved aqueous dispersion polymerization with water-immiscible monomers by using host–guest chemistry [46]. The ratio of cyclodextrin/styrene (CD/St) was regulated to obtain various morphologies. When the CD/St molar ratio was set as 1:1, the dumbbell structure was observed with the increased degree of polymerization (DP) of PS block. By using host–guest chemistry, the library of monomers for RAFT-PISA is greatly expanded. More recently, the same group successfully fabricated uniform polyethylene glycol (PEG)-b-PSt nanoflowers with low dispersity by increasing the polymerization rate [45]. This strategy could also be applied to other PISA formulations to fabricate monodisperse and hierarchical NPs. In addition, Armes and coworkers fabricated PEG-decorated vesicles by utilization of host–guest interaction between azobenzene-capped PEG and CD-modified vesicles to regulate the kinetics of morphological transition [66]. It was found that these supramolecular vesicles had a faster response to temperature than that of pure CD-modified vesicles, which may have great potential in design and fabrication of light-controlled drug delivery systems.
Although the thermal initiation is commonly used, the relatively high temperature involved in the reaction process limits the scope of RAFT-PISA. High temperature hampers the introduction of some biological materials (e.g., enzyme), which are labile to heat. Therefore, exploring more moderate reaction conditions and simpler steps is a trend of PISA development. Nonthermally initiated RAFT-PISA formulations (e.g., photo, enzyme, and ultrasound wave initiation) seem to have great potential in bioapplications.
Photo-initiated RAFT polymerization has attracted much attention owing to its robust control of polymerization in time and space [67–70]. Compared with thermal initiation, photo-initiation can allow the polymerization process to take place at low temperature. According to the wavelength of light, photoinitiation mainly includes UV and visible light initiation. Photo-initiated RAFT polymerization is mild because it is usually conducted at RT.
Notably, Chen and coworkers creatively introduced photo-initiated RAFT polymerization into the PISA system [71]. The macro-CTA P4VP was chain-extended with St units in methanol upon UV light, resulting in polymeric micelles at ambient temperature. However, the polymerization kinetics showed that the monomer conversion was relatively low in this photo-initiated polymerization process when compared with thermal-initiated dispersion polymerization, which was attributed to low activity of St at RT. In addition, when the MW did not increase upon UV light, the reaction could achieve secondary polymerization by heating. This interesting phenomenon may be explained that some encapsulated photoinitiator like AIBN cannot be irradiated by UV light due to the limited penetration depth. In general, the photo-initiated RAFT-PISA expands the scope of PISA formulations and shows promise as a powerful strategy to scale up preparation of polymeric NPs under mild conditions.
Despite the successful preparation of polymeric NPs by UV-initiation PISA, the photolysis of the RAFT agent and loss of polymerization control by UV light are still the main problem. Therefore, visible light initiation is gradually becoming the new trend of photoinitiation. During the last decade, some research groups have reported visible light-initiated RAFT-PISA [72–80]. For instance, Zhang and coworkers reported the preparation of worms and vesicles by RAFT-mediated emulsion polymerization under ambient temperature (Fig. 3A) [60]. Specially, tert-butyl methacrylate (tBMA) and tert-butyl acrylate (tBA) were used as core-forming monomers. Compared with tBMA, tBA tended to induce the evolution of morphology, which may be caused by the lower glass transition temperature (Tg) and weaker hydrophobicity (Fig. 3B). Furthermore, to overcome the quench effect of oxygen, glucose oxidase (GOx) and glucose were used, resulting in the success of RAFT-PISA in open vessels (Fig. 3C).
Photo-initiated RAFT-PISA is promising for the incorporation of bioactive materials into NPs because of its mild reaction condition. Some research work had successfully synthesized polymeric NPs with hydrophilic shell consisting of poly(amino acid)-based materials or polysaccharides [81–83]. For example, Gianneschi and coworkers fabricated proapoptotic peptide brush polymeric NPs by incorporating the proapoptotic “KLA” peptides, which could induce the apoptosis of cancer cells by disrupting the mitochondrial membrane [83]. Notably, the higher graft density of the KLA peptide in the obtained polymeric NPs had better anticancer efficiency according to the comparative experiment. Similarly, polysarcosine and polysaccharide have also been used as the hydrophilic shell for photo-PISA to improve biocompatibility and biodegradability [81,82].
Furthermore, photo-initiated RAFT-PISA can also be used as a robust technique to fabricate Janus inorganic/polymeric hybrid NPs. Janus gold NPs/block copolymers (Au@BCPs) have attracted much attention owing to their distinct physicochemical properties. However, the high reaction temperature of conventional thermal-initiated RAFT-PISA usually leads to AuNP aggregation. Therefore, photo-initiated RAFT PISA can be used as an alternative method to prepare Janus Au@BCP without high temperature. For this purpose, the P4VP-CTA end-capped with trithiocarbonate group was first decorated on the surface of AuNPs [84]. During the PISA process, by adjusting the ratio of monomer to CTA and reaction time, the size and morphology of Janus Au@BCPs could be precisely controlled.
Besides, continuous flow reactor has recently been designed to prepare polymeric NPs massively [85]. The morphology can be precisely tuned by adjusting the light intensity, solid content, and residence time. Notably, the continuous process can produce 60 g of polymeric NPs in 24 h, which has great advantages over the batch reactions. More recently, GOx and glucose were added into the reaction mixture to achieve photo-PISA without fussy degassing [86]. Through this strategy, polymeric NPs can be prepared on a large scale for biomedical application without batch-to-batch difference.
In general, compared with thermal-initiated RAFT-PISA, photo-initiated RAFT-PISA has more potential in constructing polymeric NPs when it involves the encapsulation of active molecules, which is attributed to the mild reaction of photo-PSIA [87]. According to the published literature, photo-PISA was preferred to build biological platforms.
Despite the fact that photo-initiated RAFT polymerization can be performed on a mild condition, some drawbacks still exist. For instance, the limited depth of light penetration can cause the incomplete monomer conversion. In addition, photosensitive materials are not suitable for this reaction system.
To date, enzyme-initiated RAFT polymerization has been successfully conducted [88–91]. These works realized a mild and efficient PISA by utilization of the horseradish peroxidase/hydrogen peroxide/acetylacetone (HRP/H2O2/ACAC) ternary initiating system. In addition, GOx was also exploited to produce free radicals in the presence of oxygen [92,93]. For example, Tan and coworkers first introduced enzyme initiation into RAFT-PISA [94]. In this case, mPEG113-4-cyano-4-(ethylthiocarbonothioylthio) pentanoic acid (mPEG113-CEPA) was used as macro-CTA for the polymerization of 2-hydroxypropyl methacrylate (HPMA) units (Fig. 4A). By adjusting the solid content and DP of the HPMA block, various morphologies can be obtained, and detailed phase diagram was drawn (Fig. 4B). During the reaction process, free radicals were generated through the oxidation of ACAC by hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in the presence of HRP. To avoid the influence of oxygen, GOx was used as catalyst to transform oxygen into H2O2 in the presence of glucose (Fig. 4C). In this way, complicated freeze–pump–thaw cycles were not necessary. Notably, the vesicles had the ability to load both biomacromolecules and inorganic materials. As characterized by TEM, the SiO2 NPs and bovine serum albumin (BSA) could be loaded in the cavities of polymeric vesicles, and the BSA had little effect on the formation of vesicular morphology.
As known, the epoxy group is unstable under high temperature (e.g., 80 °C). Therefore, traditional thermal-initiated RAFT-PISA is not suitable for preparing epoxy-functionalized NPs. Impressively, epoxy-functionalized polymeric NPs can be prepared by photo-initiated RAFT-PISA [95]. Besides, enzyme-initiated seeded RAFT-PISA can also be used to prepare epoxy-functionalized triblock copolymer vesicles [89]. In this case, the prepared poly(glycerol monomethacrylate)46-PHPMA300 vesicles were used as macro-CTA for the polymerization of glycidyl methacrylate (GlyMA) monomers, and the surface of vesicles became rough by increasing the DP of PGlyMA block.
In a word, enzyme-initiated RAFT-PISA is a mild strategy to fabricate polymeric nano-objects on a large scale. Compared with photo-initiated PISA, it expands the scope of monomers, which can be involved in the mild PISA process. However, the current enzyme-initiated PISA experiments were carried out in aqueous solution. Therefore, exploring more types of enzymes suitable for PISA and improving the stability of enzyme in organic solvent are worthy of further study.
Compared with above RAFT-PISA, ultrasound-initiated RAFT-PISA does not need traditional initiators [96]. Free radicals for ultrasound-initiated RAFT-PISA are generated by high-frequency ultrasound. Different from photo-initiated RAFT-PISA, the free radicals dispersed evenly throughout the reaction system, avoiding the problem of uneven distribution of free radical concentration. In 2018, the first ultrasound-initiated RAFT-PISA was successfully performed in water by using high-frequency ultrasound (490 kHz) with monomer conversion nearly 100% in 60 min [97]. The obtained poly(poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether acrylate)-poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-N,N′-methylenebis(acrylamide)) (PPEGA-P(NIPAM-co-MBA)) nanogels had the lower critical solution temperature (LCST)-type thermosensitive characteristic. Because the LCST of PNIPAM block was 32 °C, when temperature was increased from 25 to 45 °C, the size and polydispersity index (PDI) of polymeric NPs decreased, which was caused by the collapse of P(NIPAM-co-MBA) block. Notably, ultrasound wave-initiated RAFT-PISA can be used for expanding the scope of functional materials.
For another, Thang et al. adopted the ultrasound (990 kHz) to prepare polymeric NPs with various morphologies (Fig. 5A) [98]. The work first prepared vesicle morphology by Sono-RAFT-PISA (Fig. 5B). For comparison, thermal-initiated RAFT-PISA was also investigated. Compared to thermal initiation, polymeric vesicles were formed at shorter PHPMA length by ultrasound-initiated RAFT-PISA. In addition, the size of obtained vesicles prepared by ultrasound-initiated RAFT-PISA was much smaller (126.2 nm versus 599.2 nm), and the PDI was also narrower (0.02 versus 0.23). However, worm structures were difficult to achieve due to high ultrasonic frequency. To overcome the influence of acoustic streaming effect, the core cross-linking (CCL) strategy was used as a solution to prepare wormlike nano-assemblies (Fig. 5C).
Ultrasound-initiated RAFT-PISA is emerging as a promising technique to fabricate NPs on a large scale. More importantly, the water in the system is used not only as a solvent but also as an initiation source. Therefore, no external initiators and additives are needed, which makes the ultrasound-initiated RAFT-PISA technique quite “green.” Compared with thermal initiation and photo-initiation, ultrasound-initiated RAFT-PISA does not suffer from uneven heating and insufficient depth of light penetration. However, the effect of high ultrasonic frequency on the morphology of nano-assemblies during the PISA process still needs further studies.
ATRP is one of the most well-developed controlled polymerization techniques [99,100]. Compared with other polymerization techniques, the unique characteristic of ATRP is the requirement of transition metal catalyst. In addition, the polymerization condition is mild without high temperature and pressure. ATRP can be conducted in various single or mixed solvents, such as MeOH, water/MeOH, and supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO2) [101]. However, according to amounts of the published work, ATRP-PISA does not seem to be a good PISA formulation, mainly because transition metal complexes can bring potential toxicity into polymeric NPs and unpleasant control. The first ATRP-PISA work was reported by Pan and coworkers in 2007 [102]. What is more, after the reaction, the remaining metal catalysts in the nanostructures are harmful for use, especially in biomedical application [103]. How to improve and optimize the reaction condition of ATRP is the key issue in recent years.
Notably, initiators for continuous activator regeneration atom transfer radical polymerization (ICAR ATRP) is a powerful method to improve the reaction process by lowering the concentration of metal catalyst. In 2016, ICAR ATRP-PISA was first used to prepare poly(oligo(ethylene oxide) methyl ether methacrylate)-b-poly(benzyl methacrylate) (POEOMA-b-PBnMA) with the parts per million (ppm) concentration of copper catalyst (Fig. 6A) [104]. Here, Matyjaszewski and coworkers used the CuBr2/tris(pyridine-2-ylmethyl)amine (TPMA) complex as catalyst at RT or at 65 °C with various radical initiators. In detail, the research studied the effect of the catalyst concentration, solid content, and temperature on the self-assembly behavior. Notably, the glass transition temperature (Tg) of the core-forming block was 54 °C, which was between RT and 65 °C. Therefore, various assembly behaviors were observed. When at ambient temperature, large spheres were observed as the main morphology. As the solid content and the DP of PBnMA increased, a fractal-type connected-bead structure was finally obtained (Fig. 6B). However, when the temperature was 65 °C, the morphology transition from spheres to worms also appeared at low solid content (10%, w/w) (Fig. 6C). The reduced catalyst concentration in ATRP-PISA can expand the scope of the relevant applications. More recently, Wang’s group explored the morphological evolution of NPs using mixed POEOMA24 and POEOMA78 as macroinitiator [105]. Other polymers such as methoxy-poly(ethylene oxide)-polyacrylonitrile (mPEO113-PAN) was successfully synthesized via ICAR ATRP [106]. Spherical and wormlike NPs could be obtained through self-assembly. The reduced catalyst concentration in ATRP-PISA can expand the scope of the relevant applications.
In addition, activators regenerated by electron transfer atom transfer radical polymerization (ARGET ATRP) is another method to achieve ATRP process with lower concentration of catalyst (ppm) [107,108]. In such a process, high-valent transition metal complexes were used as catalysts and excess reducing agents were added intermittently to continuously reduce the high-valent transition metals to low-valent oxides to effectively reduce the amount of catalyst. For instance, Matyjaszewski and coworkers reported the fabrication of crossed-linked NPs in ethanol by ARGET ATRP-PISA [109]. Here, POEOMA with a terminal bromide was used as macro-CTA to extend with glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) or BnMA monomers. The different conversion rate between double bond and oxirane ring in GMA guaranteed the PISA process and the subsequent in situ cross-link of NPs.
Organic–inorganic materials have been widely applied in catalyst, imaging, and nanomedical fields. To realize practical application of ATRP-PISA, a novel NP consisting of POEOMA-b-poly (2-(perfluorohexyl)ethyl methacrylate (PHFEMA)-co-GMA) had been prepared by ATRP-PISA [110]. Afterward, mercapto-succinic acid was used to react with the epoxy group on the GMA, and the carboxyl groups were successfully introduced into the core of polymeric NPs. Subsequently, the nano-objects can be used as template to prepare Fe3O4@POEOMA organic–inorganic NPs. As characterized by TEM, dynamic light scattering (DLS), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), Fe3O4@POEOMA with an average diameter of about 150 nm was prepared. In addition, the diameter could be modulated by varying the packing parameter.
As known, the solvent, solid content, target DP, and temperature are key factors on the morphology of the nano-assemblies prepared by PISA. Whether different PISA formulations can fabricate different morphologies with the same BCP composition is a question worth exploring. In 2017, Zhang and coworkers reported the fabrication of diblock copolymer poly(2-hydroxypropyl methacrylate-b-benzyl methacrylate) (PHPMA-b-PBzMA) nano-assemblies to make a comparison between ATRP and RAFT [111]. The results indicated that both 2 robust polymerization techniques had good control on the MW and MW distribution. Notably, the ATRP dispersion polymerization was faster than the RAFT dispersion polymerization. In addition, nano-objects prepared by ICAR ATRP-PISA were larger than that prepared by RAFT polymerization.
More recently, the same group made another comparison between ATRP-PISA and RAFT-PISA [112]. The PEG-b-PS nano-assemblies were prepared by ATRP-PISA and RAFT-PISA. Although the targeted DP of PS was the same, the high copolymer dispersity existing in ATRP-PISA led to various morphologies. In addition, the concentration of Cu salt on the effect of morphology was explored. With the increase of Cu salt concentration, the flower-like structure was formed. As a robust PISA formulation, ATRP-PISA can be used to prepare functional NPs on a large scale. Compared to RAFT-PISA, ATRP-PISA is usually performed at RT and does not involve the sulfur-containing structure.
As mentioned above, nano-assemblies including spheres, worms, and vesicles can be prepared by controlled radical polymerization technique-mediated PISA. Nevertheless, the suitable monomers are mainly methacrylates and vinyls. However, the obtained NPs constructed by these PISA methods are usually not biodegradable. In this section, ROP-PISA including ring-opening metathesis-mediated PISA (ROMP-PISA), ROP of N-carboxyanhydride-induced self-assembly (NCA-PISA), and radical ROP-induced self-assembly (rROP-PISA) will be elaborated carefully.
ROMP is a nonradical method to achieve the polymerization process with Ru-based catalysts under mild reaction conditions (Fig. 7). Cyclic monomers are used in the ROMP-PISA process to fabricate polynorbornene (PNB)-based NPs with various morphologies. In recent years, due to extraordinary functional group tolerance, ROMP-PISA is emerging as a robust approach to prepare functional NPs under mild condition [113].
For example, Xie and coworkers first reported the facile preparation of functionalized polymeric nano-assemblies by the ROMP-PISA technique [114]. The homopolymer poly(2,3-dihydroxymethyl-5-norbornene) (PBNBE) was used to be chain-extended with 7-oxanorborn-5-ene-exo-exo2,3-dicarboxylic acid dimethyl ester (ONBDM) monomers and self-assembled into NPs in toluene. Later, the same group reported the preparation of triblock copolymer PBNBE-b-poly(exo-N-(cinnamoyloxyethyl)-7-oxanorborn-5-ene-2,3-dicarboximide) (PCONBI)-b-PONBDM with UV-crosslink core [115]. Through cross-linking strategy, fabricated NPs retained the original morphology in good solvent as CHCl3, which indicated that the stability of obtained NPs had been improved greatly. Further, relevant works where higher-order morphologies and functional NPs were generated were reported by other groups [116,117].
Further, more and more functional monomers have been used in ROMP-PISA to achieve desired applications in recent years. Char and coworkers first reported the sulfur-rich polymeric NPs constructed by ROMP-PISA [118]. When increasing the ratio of the sulfur-containing monomer during the PISA process, the refractive index changed in a controlled manner, which could be used for monitoring the reaction process. In addition, enzyme-responsive polymeric NPs were prepared under open-to-air condition [119]. First, l-amino acid-based norbornene dicarboximide peptide substrate with sequence GPLGLAGGWGERDGS was chose to synthesize hydrophilic block, which was then chain-extended with quaternary aminebased phenyl norbornene dicarboximide to self-assemble into spherical micelles. The recognition sequence PLGLAG existing in the hydrophilic shell was the substrate of enzyme thermolysin. Therefore, the obtained NPs would undergo phase transitions when exposed to the proteolytic thermolysin.
However, a major obstacle to conduct aqueous ROMP-PISA is the poor solubility of Grubbs catalyst in water. One solution to make catalyst water-soluble is to modify it by introducing hydrophilic chain segment [120,121]. For this purpose, a single cationic quaternary amine Hoveyda–Grubbs second-generation initiator was used in the ROMP-PISA to build well-defined NPs and detailed phase diagram was produced [120]. Recently, highly hydrophilic Grubbs catalyst was developed to obtain polymers with excellent control on MW and dispersity [122]. First, a short hydrophilic chain was polymerized in tetrahydrofuran (THF) in the presence of G3. Afterward, the obtained macroinitiator could be chain-extended with second hydrophobic monomers. During ROMP-PISA, various morphologies were observed, such as spheres, worms, and vesicles.
Polypeptide-based materials have been always attractive due to their distinct advantages including excellent biocompatibility and biodegradability [123,124]. Traditional self-assembly of polypeptides is generally conducted in a selective solvent, which is inefficient and time-consuming. A facile one-pot preparation strategy of polypeptide NPs was first reported by Du and coworkers in 2019 [125]. Here, PEG45-NH2 macroinitiator was used to polymerize with l-phenylalanine NCAs (l-Phe NCAs) in anhydrous THF (Fig. 8A). Compared with the above PISA formulations, this ROP-PISA was conducted on the highly mild condition (10 °C) and the whole process did not need additional species. The hydrophilic/hydrophobic ratio and solid content could be finely regulated to achieve vesical morphology (Fig. 8B). Furthermore, the in vitro enzymatic degradation experiments showed that most vesicles were degraded in 96 h when treated with trypsin (Fig. 8C). Reactive oxygen species (ROS)-responsive methionine NCA monomer was also applied as hydrophobic block to fabricate polymeric NPs under high solid content (up to 45%) [126]. The obtained polymeric NPs were incubated in different concentrations of H2O2 (e.g., 0.1, 1, and 10 mM) to investigate their oxidative degradation behavior. Notably, these vesicles could be quickly degraded under various H2O2 concentrations, which had great potential as intelligent nanocarriers. The novel NCA-PISA brings great potential for biomedical applications including drug delivery and bioimaging.
More importantly, aqueous ROP-PISA of NCAs, which was first reported by Bonduelle’s group in 2019, is a big breakthrough because NCA monomers are believed to be moisture-labile [127]. To be specific, sodium bicarbonate aqueous solution (pH 8.5, 50 mM) was used to prevent the hydrolysis of NCAs and promoted the ROP-PISA process. PEG5k-NH2 was used as the macroinitiator to be chain-extended with γ-benzyl-L-glutamate N-carboxyanhydrides (BLG-NCAs) at 4 °C. The aqueous NCA-PISA not only fabricated some conventional morphologies including spheres and worms but also obtained homogeneous needle-like structures. It was envisioned that this ROP-PISA process was able to use different macroinitiators and NCA monomers. Notably, owing to the unique feature of polypeptides (e.g., secondary structure), NCA-PISA is different from the above PISA formulations, which is also worthy of further exploration.
Very recently, the same group reported the effect of polypeptides’ secondary structure on the morphologies of formed NPs in 2021 [128]. Two different monomers, i.e., BLG-NCA and Leu-NCA, that possessed α-helix and β-sheet conformation, respectively, were used to investigate the influence of secondary structure on ROP-PISA. The results demonstrated that the Leu-NCA monomers enhanced the anisotropic character of the resulting self-assemblies. In fact, compared with α-helical polypeptides, β-sheet polypeptides tended to form long rods with high aspect ratio. As a novel PISA technique, more and more research work is worth doing to explore the formation mechanism of NPs.
More recently, Du and coworkers carefully studied the effect of monomer chirality in chirality-controlled PISA by adjusting the chiral molar ratio of the Phe NCAs [129]. Various chiral composition also leads to different α-helix fraction and β-sheet fraction. When β-sheet fraction increased to 50%, the uniform PISA behavior disappeared, which meant that the β-sheet structure could weaken assembly behavior. Notably, in addition to morphological control, by increasing of D-Phe fraction, the biodegradability of obtained NPs decreased. Adjustable biodegradation rate can be applied to control the drug release rate, thus having significant potential for biological applications.
Improving the biodegradability of polymers is of great significance for bioapplications. Radical ROP is a method in which degradable groups (e.g., ester and thioester) can be introduced into the main chain of the polymer structure. Recently, Nicolas and coworkers first reported the rROP-PISA based on cyclic ketene acetals (CKAs) in heptane, such as 2-methylene-4phenyl-1,3-dioxolane (MPDL) and 5,6-benzo-2methylene-1,3-dioxepane (BMDO) [130]. As expected, the introduction of ester groups greatly improved the degradation property, which was verified by degradation test between the MPDL-free poly(lauryl methacrylate)-b-PBzMA (PLMA-b-PBzMA) copolymer and PLMA-b-P(BzMA-co-MPDL) copolymers. Notably, by increasing the ratio of CKA, the better degradation could be achieved.
More recently, aqueous suspensions of degradable copolymer NPs were prepared by the 2-step rROP-PISA process [131]. First, poly[oligo(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate] (POEGMA) was chosen as solvophilic block to be chain-extended with the 3 main CKA monomers [e.g., MPDL, BMDO, and 2-methylene-1,3-dioxepane (MDO)] to in situ fabricate NPs in N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF). Then, the suspensions of NPs were dialyzed against water. To be specific, the POEGMA chain preserved the stability of NPs when the formation was transferred from DMF to water. Notably, the longer POEGMA block provided better stability of NPs especially for high CKA contents. All these CKA-containing NPs exhibited quick hydrolytic degradation under accelerated conditions (2.5 wt% KOH), proving that degradable vinyl polymeric NPs have great potential in bioapplications (Table 1).
Nowadays, design and construction of biomedical nanoplatforms has gained great significance especially in the field of human healthcare. The stability of therapeutic agents can be greatly improved by encapsulation in NPs. Furthermore, by incorporation of targeting moieties, these NPs can efficiently target the disease sites. In recent years, PISA has been proved to be a robust technique to prepare functional NPs. Therefore, fabricating biomedical platform by PISA can not only achieve greater value of PISA but also improve the efficiency of the preparation [32,34,132]. So far, a range of polymeric NPs have been fabricated by PISA strategy for biomedical applications. In the following section, the efficient encapsulation and controlled release of different cargoes including imaging agents, anticancer drugs, and enzymes will be demonstrated in detail (Table 2).
The premise of precise treatment on diseases is able to precisely assess early diagnosis. Therefore, bioimaging has great significance on medical diagnosis and subsequent therapy. Current biological imaging techniques consisted of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), fluorescence imaging (FI), etc. [133]. Imaging agents are generally requested for precise detection of diseases. However, these small imaging agents usually have poor biodistribution and unsatisfied signal-to-noise ratio. Notably, by encapsulation of these imaging agents in polymeric NPs, the above issues can be greatly alleviated.
As a common clinical imaging technique, CT has been widely used owing to its high efficiency [134,135]. However, the conventional contrast agents (e.g., iohexol) are easy to be cleared quickly and distribute highly in normal tissues and organs, and iodinated NPs can overcome the above limitations. The most iodinated NPs prepared by traditional self-assembly method cannot meet the requirements of clinical imaging owing to the complicated and low loading efficiency of iodine. To overcome above limitations, iohexol NPs (INPs) have been successfully fabricated by PISA in high concentration (up to 120 mg ml-1) [136]. Here, the macro-CTA PEG5k-S-1-dodecyl-Sʹ-(α,α′-dimethyl-α′′-acetic acid) trithiocarbonate (PEG5k-TTC) was chain-extended with hydrophobic monomer HPMA to fabricate polymeric NPs (Fig. 9A). Then, iohexol acrylate was used as crosslinking agent to achieve efficient loading. Notably, the loading efficiency of iohexol in these NPs reached 36.5%, endowing these INPs great potential in CT as contrast agent. The in vivo pharmacokinetic studies showed that INPs had a longer half-life compared with free iohexol and a higher-level CT signal. Notably, the INPs had low accumulation in liver and renal tissues, resulting in low biological toxicity and extended retention time. As expected, the novel INPs had a significant accumulation in tumor rather than normal tissues, which greatly improved the sensitivity of CT imaging in cancer diagnosis. In addition, according to the 3-(4,5)-dimethylthiahiazo (-z-y1)-2,5-di-phenytetrazoliumromide (MTT) assay in vitro, the viabilities of cells incubated with INPs were all over 90%, which showed high biocompatibility of INPs. Finally, by performing CT scans on the animals treated with INPs, main organs (e.g., liver and kidney) and representative blood vessels (e.g., renal vein, renal artery, aorta jugular vein, and the left ventricle) could be imaged clearly (Fig. 9B). These above results proved the INPs could effectively improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce biotoxicity.
In addition to CT imaging, MRI as another conventional imaging technique also requires contrast agents to enhance the image quality, because it is easily affected by the high background signal from water. To improve the imaging quality, a strategy designed to minimize an overwhelming background signal and largely prepare polymeric NPs had been reported [137]. Briefly, 19F-containing poly(oligo(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate-co-2,2,2-trifluoroethyl acrylate) [poly(OEGA-co-TFEA)] was used as macro-CTA to fabricate polymeric NPs with various morphologies. As expected, all fluorinated NPs had detectable 19F MRI signal, in which the spherical NPs with the highest fluorine content (0.26 wt%) had the highest 19F MRI signal-to-noise ratio (8.09 × 106 ms). Notably, the 19F nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) relaxation time T1 and T2 values of various morphological NPs were approximate, indicating that the dynamics of the corona of different NPs were identical. In addition, the effect of the morphology on cell uptake was investigated. Consistent with previous studies, the wormlike nanostructure with higher aspect ratio had the highest cell uptake efficiency. However, the vesicle NPs were difficult to be uptaken by cells. The cell uptake result was also confirmed by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). All these results showed the fluorinated NPs with wormlike morphology had the potential for in vivo cell tracking and cell imaging. Furthermore, more fluorinated NPs can be constructed by PISA to perform bioimaging and disease diagnosis.
More recently, 19F MRI nanotracers were first fabricated by aqueous RAFT-PISA, using N-(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl)acrylamide (TFEAM) as core-forming monomers (Fig. 10A) [138]. However, the PEG-b-PTFEAM NPs did not have strong 19F NMR signal, which was attributed to the limited mobility of the core-forming blocks, further leading to the poor magnetic relaxation properties. Therefore, hydrophilic N-hydroxyethyl acrylamide (HEAM) monomer was used to improve chain hydration and mobility. With the increasing content of HEAM (up to 30%), the signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of the NP dispersions gradually increased (Fig. 10B). In addition, for further biomedical application, ensuring the stability of the micelles, PEG91-b-(PTFEAM320-stat-PHEAM80) (F5H2) was used as nanotracer. In in vivo imaging experiment, after the injection of F5H2 nanotracers into the right hind leg of mouse, obvious 19F MRI signals with excellent SNRs could be monitored, indicating that the novel fluorinated NPs constructed by PISA had great potential in biomedical imaging (Fig. 10C).
In addition, fluorescent materials have been developed and grown vigorously in recent years owing to the great potential in biomedical fields [139–141]. Some organic fluorescent molecules are limited in the bioapplication, ascribed to poor solubility in water. RAFT-PISA is a robust technique to prepare fluorescent NPs for bioimaging.
For instance, chalcone-containing NPs with uniform spherical morphology had been successfully prepared by using chalcone derivative terminated with ethylene group [142]. Interestingly, when the NPs were transferred from dioxane to water, the size shrank distinctively from ~200 nm to ~100 nm. Furthermore, the emission intensity significantly improved, which was contributed to the aggregation-induced emission feature of chalcone. The biocompatibility of the fluorescent NPs was characterized by CCK-8 kit assay. The cell still maintained high cellular activity (above 90%), although the concentration of NPs reached 40 μg/ml. Further, HeLa cells were cultivated with fluorescent NPs (10 μg/ml) for cell imaging. The obtained fluorescent images with high contrast confirmed the great potential of fluorescent NPs in cell imaging.
More recently, poly ((oligo(ethylene glycol) acrylate)-b-poly(benzyl acrylate) (POEGA-b-PBzA) NPs had been fabricated by photo-mediated RAFT-PISA (Fig. 11A) [143]. Notably, sub-50-nm spherical NPs were successfully obtained by the adjustment of chain length (Fig. 11B). Fluorescent molecules were loaded into the NPs through facile swelling procedure. Attractively, the fluorescent sub-50-nm NPs had quantum yield higher than 50% in various solvents. Besides, characterized by the cytotoxicity investigations and the preliminary cell uptake assay, these NPs possessed high biocompatibility and great potential for bioimaging. Confocal fluorescence microscopy images showed that various cells had fluorescent signals after being incubated with the NPs, and these imaging results by NPs and cell tracker were consistent with each other, which proved the feasibility of the fluorescent NPs in biological imaging (Fig. 11C). Notably, although the concentration of dye was 15 nM in water, the higher intracellular fluorescence could be detected. Moreover, the process of polymeric NPs penetrating across cell membrane was observed, and the fluorescence intensity could be monitored within 22 s after injection. In addition, cytoplasmic vesicles (e.g., endosomes and lysosomes) had a higher fluorescence intensity compared with cytosol and nucleus.
What is more, azo-reductases are commonly found in the human colon, which drives azobenzene-based polymeric NPs to apply in colon disease treatment. A series of tetraphenylethylene (TPE)-azobenzene fluorescent probe-incorporated NPs had been fabricated by RAFT-PISA, while doxorubicin (DOX) was encapsulated in the self-assembly process. Then, the obtained NPs were used for bioimaging and treatment (Fig. 12A) [144]. When these NPs were exposed to azo reductase, the azo double bond would be destructed, leading to the disassembly of NPs and further release of DOX. Notably, the cumulative release of DOX reached 58.5% at 24 h. Instead, only a very small percentage (<10%) of DOX was released without the presence of azoreductase. In addition, the cleavage of azo bond eliminated the fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) process. Therefore, a gradual increase in luminescence intensity was observed within 24 h. The DOX-loaded micelles were first incubated in the presence of enzyme azoreductase for 24 h and then used in cell uptake experiment. After 4 h of incubation, the DOX fluorescent signal was gradually enhanced, indicating that DOX successfully entered cell nuclei and achieved accumulation (Fig. 12B). The obvious fluorescent signal from TPE fragment was also observed after 4 h of incubation. Notably, the obtained NPs with integrated diagnostic and therapeutic functions showed great potential in biomedical applications. Similarly, a novel near infrared (NIR) fluorescent nanoprobe was designed to realize synchronous drug release and cell imaging [145]. The NIR fluorophore Aza-BODIPY moiety was introduced into the hydrophilic macro-CTA and chain-extended with the hydrophobic monomer BzMA to fabricate spherical and vesicular NPs. In a simulated colon environment, reduction-triggered drug release and real-time fluorescent behavior of these obtained NPs were investigated. With the extension of incubation time up to 24 h, the gradual release behavior of DOX (~60%) was observed. In the process of incubation, the NPs gradually dissociated; thus, the aggregation-caused quench (ACQ) effect disappeared and increased fluorescence intensity was observed. Then, the fluorescent NPs were incubated with mouse colon cancer cells (CT26 cells) under normoxia (16% O2) and hypoxia (1% O2) to test cell imaging. Compared with the normoxic environment, higher fluorescence intensity was observed in the hypoxic environment, which could explain the overexpression of azoreductases in hypoxic cancer cells. In general, the NIR fluorescent nanoprobes can be used to build an integrated platform for diagnosis and treatment.
In conclusion, polymeric NPs constructed by the PISA method have been used in bioimaging. However, owing to the strict requirements for solvents and monomers, current NPs are far from satisfaction. Furthermore, more suitable PISA formulations to improve the biocompatibility of NPs are also urgent. In fact, the significant values of encapsulation of imaging agents for bioimaging are worthy of more research work.
As commonly used cancer treatment, chemotherapy, where small molecule drugs kill cancer cells, usually causes serious side effects to patients. Meanwhile, the nonspecific distribution of therapeutic drugs is another obstacle. Nowadays, nanocarriers have been widely used to improve the solubility and pharmacokinetics of therapeutic drugs. Generally, extended blood circulation time and targeted accumulation of these drugs can be achieved by encapsulation in polymeric NPs. As mentioned, PISA is emerging as a robust technique to fabricate suitable nanocarriers for encapsulation of therapeutic drugs. Plenty of NPs have been exploited for intracellular delivery [146–149], proving that PISA has great potential in constructing drug delivery systems (Fig. 13).
For example, poly[oligo(ethyleneglycol) methacrylate]-b-[poly(styrene)-co-poly(vinyl benzaldehyde)] [POEGMA-b-P(ST-co-VBA)] NPs with various morphologies were prepared by RAFT-PISA [150]. DOX was successfully encapsulated in the core of NPs through conjugation with aldehyde groups via pH-breakable bonds, and the drug loading efficiency reached 67%. Most drugs (~80%) could be released from nanocarriers at pH 5.0 in a controlled manner, which was much higher than that at pH 7.4. Subsequently, the cellular uptake behaviors of these DOX-loaded NPs were investigated by incubating with breast cancer cells (MCF-7) for 24 h. Notably, during the incubation process, the highest cell uptake efficiency was observed for worm- and rod-like structures by using flow cytometry. The final result could explain that the higher aspect ratio of worm- and rod-like structures caused a greater adhesion of polymeric NPs to the cell membrane compared with vesicle and spherical micelles. In addition, the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of the worm- and rod-like structures was 7 times lower than spherical micelles. The above result was consistent with the higher cell uptake of the worm- and rod-like NPs. Similarly, Pan and coworkers also explored the influence of morphology on drug delivery processes [151]. Briefly, poly((N,N-dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate) (PDMAEMA) was used as macro-CTA to polymerize with p-(methacryloxyethoxy)benzaldehyde (MAEBA) units for in situ fabrication of polymeric NPs. The aldehyde groups of PMAEBA were used to conjugate with DOX. Afterward, HeLa cells were incubated with these NPs with various morphologies (e.g., spheres, nanorods, and vesicles) for 24 h. The results by testing the fluorescent intensity of DOX indicated that the cellular uptake rate had the following order: vesicle > nanorod > sphere. However, the in vitro cytotoxicity of DOX-loaded nanorod was more cytotoxic than the DOX-loaded vesicle, which demonstrated that more DOX molecules were released from the DOX-loaded nanorods. Relatively more nanorods than vesicles were localized in acidic organelles, and the drugs were more likely to be released in acidic conditions. These above results may guide the future design and fabrication of drug delivery nano-system and improve the effectiveness of the disease treatment.
As known, drug loading efficiency is a key parameter for the encapsulation of drugs. Recently, the introduction of coordination interactions between polymers and chemo drugs is an efficient strategy to achieve high drug loading efficiency [152]. In addition, design and fabrication of prodrug monomers is also an ideal strategy to improve drug loading efficiency [153–155]. During PISA, therapeutic prodrugs can be directly conjugated to polymeric backbones. For example, the camptothecin (CPT)-containing copolymer PEG-b-P(2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethyl methacrylate PEG-b-P(MEO2MA)-co-CPTM) was used as macro RAFT agent to polymerize with BzMA monomers to achieve prodrug NPs [154]. It was worth mentioning that this method realized polymerization, self-assembly, and drug loading simultaneously. Therefore, the obtained prodrug NPs did not need complex purification, saving a lot of time and labor. Notably, the drug content could be facilely tuned by adjusting the molar ratio of CPTM/MEO2MA. Notably, encapsulated CPT could be released under reductive environment. The obtained prodrug NPs were conducted with in vitro drug release at different concentrations of glutathione (GSH) (0.01, 5, and 10 mM). The higher cumulative CPT release was achieved with the higher GSH concentration. The cumulative CPT release reached 42% after incubation in 10 mM GSH for 48 h. Notably, the obtained polymeric NPs without CPT conjugation were noncytotoxic even when the concentration was up to 1,000 μg/ml. To further study the intracellular drug release of the prodrug micelles, CLSM results demonstrated that the CPT drug was gradually released and accumulated in cell nucleus. In general, PISA provides a robust method to construct CPT prodrug NPs, facilitating the development of the field of nanodrug delivery.
Recently, to overcome the disadvantages of small conventional platinum analogs and the limitations of traditional assembly methods, one approach was used to use ROMP-PISA in water to incorporate platinum-based drug into polymeric NPs [156]. In brief, the poly(oligo ethylene glycol) (POEG) stabilizer was directly chain-extended with the cisplatin analog norbornene dicarboximide (CAND) for the fabrication of drug-loaded NPs. Meanwhile, pH-responsive 2-(diisopropylamino)ethyl norbornene dicarboximide (DEND) monomers were used to achieve controllable disassembly upon acid tumor environment. The effect of the size and zeta potential on cell uptake procedure was systematically studied. Among these platinum-loaded NPs, smaller NPs had higher cytotoxicity, while positively charged NPs had higher cell uptake efficiency than the negatively charged ones, facilitating the design of NPs with better performance. In addition, owing to the ability of preparing platinum-loaded NPs in high concentration, ROMP-PISA promises to formulate pharmaceuticals for low volume injections at high dose for human disease.
Besides small therapeutic drugs, proteins are specific and highly active substances, which play an important role in regulation of vital activities. In recent years, much effort has been devoted to deliver therapeutic proteins for precise nanomedicine. However, owing to its poor stability and short circulation time in vivo, the application prospects are greatly limited.
The use of therapeutic proteins in the clinic has been increasing quickly in the past few years because of high efficiency [157,158]. Unfortunately, the stable delivery of proteins is quite difficult because proteins are susceptible to immune responses and are easily inactivated upon internal or external conditions. Normally, modification of proteins by using hydrophilic chain segments can extend their in vivo blood circulation time. For example, the PEGylated interferon-α (PEGASYS) has 8.6-fold half-life time than native therapeutic protein interferon-α (IFN). What is more, Gao and coworkers improved the in vivo half-life time of IFN as long as 83.8 h by site-specific in situ PISA (SI-PISA) strategy (Fig. 14A) [159]. However, PEGylation products usually have lower bioactivities owing to the presence of positional isomers. Here, to avoid creating positional isomers, POEGMA was used as an alternative to PEG. Compared with IFN, the plasma IFN levels of IFN-micelle consisted of IFN-POEGMA-PHPMA decreased slowly after intravenous injection. Then, the biodistribution of IFN-micelle was studied in the ovarian tumor-bearing mouse model. The IFN levels of IFN-micelle had significantly increased accumulation in major organs compared with PEGylation and POEGMA conjugation of IFN. Furthermore, the IFN-micelle was more effective than PEGASYS in terms of inhibiting tumor growth (Fig. 14B). More significantly, after treatment with IFN-micelle, the survival rate of mice remained 100% as long as 120 days (Fig. 14C). The above results indicated that the SI-PISA has great potential to improve the pharmacology of therapeutic proteins.
However, the chemical modifications of proteins may cause some changes to their inherent characteristics. Therefore, physical encapsulation of the protein is also a good choice. Traditional method of encapsulating therapeutic protein usually requires multiple steps, and the polymeric vesicles need to be permeable. l-Asparaginase (ASNS) is a therapeutic enzyme used for leukemia treatment, which has been encapsulated in vesical cavity by the one-pot method [160]. The successful preparation of ASNS-loaded vesicles by aqueous photo-PISA has been characterized by TEM, atomic force microscope (AFM), and DLS methods. The mild reaction condition of photo-PISA did not disrupt the structure of proteins. A greater stability in vitro and in vivo had been achieved compared to native protein or PEGylated conjugate. Besides, the antibodies would be blocked from entering the vesicle. Thus, the immunogenicity of the enzyme was reduced under the protection of vesicles, lowering the risk of an immune response. Notably, the in vitro experiments showed that cell proliferation suffered from enhanced inhibition when treated with ASNS-loaded vesicles (58%) compared to PEG-ASNS (61%) and free ASNS (78%). Finally, ASNS encapsulated in the polymeric vesicles has lower accumulation in the liver and the kidneys compared to free ASNS. Therefore, the size-selectively permeable vesicle prepared by PISA is a good choice to encapsulate protein without chemically altering the protein, thus providing better therapeutic effect.
More recently, an innovated dengue virus-mimicking triblock vesicle was designed to treat triple-negative (TN) breast cancer [161]. Here, poly(glycerol monomethacrylate) (PGMA) as macro-CTA was successively chain-extended with HPMA and 2-(diisopropylamino)ethyl methacrylate (DPA) monomers. The protonation behavior of PDPA block under acid environment endowed the vesicles with ultra pH-responsive behavior. To achieve active targeting property, a small fraction (3 mol%) of the PGMA was replaced by poly(2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl phosphorylcholine) (PMPC), which could actively target SR-B1 scavenger receptor-overexpressed TN breast cancer cells. In cell uptake experiments, when treated with vesicles without PMPC block, all cells showed low uptake. However, triblock copolymer vesicles containing PMPC block could actively target TN breast cancer cells. The obtained vesicles were used to load plasmid DNA (pEGFP) by electroporation and then used in the cell uptake experiments to prove the ability to target the nuclear region. By characterizing the expression of fluorescent EGFP within the cells, the vesicle could deliver functional biomolecules (e.g., plasmid DNA) to the nuclear region. Finally, the bionic vesicles constructed by PISA can provide better therapeutics for TN breast cancer.
What is more, heparin is a sulfated polysaccharide, having great potential in wound healing and tissue regeneration by stabling the fibroblast growth factors (FGFs). Notably, PISA can also be used to fabricate heparin-mimicking sulfonated NPs. For this case, poly(2-acrylamido-2-methyl propane sulfonic acid) [P(AMPS)] was used as macro-CTA to chain-extend with St units [162]. The NPs showed low biotoxicity to murine embryonic fibroblast cells even if the concentration reached 1 mg ml−1. Also, the heparin-mimicking NPs displayed greater cellular proliferation than heparin (400% versus 150%). The difference of cellular proliferation may be mainly attributed to the existence of numerous surface-active P(AMPS) chains at the surface of NPs, thus promoting the stabilization of FGF. In general, PISA provides a facile route to fabricate sulfonated NPs at high solid content, thus facilitating the study of heparin mimicry.
Enzymes have received significant attention for the high efficiency in biocatalysis [163]. However, enzymes are prone to be inactivated as a result of being stimulated by external environment. The nanoreactor can isolate the protein from the external environment and enable the protein to interact with small substrates simultaneously. In 2017, O’Reilly and coworkers reported the polymeric vesicles consisting of PEG-b-PHPMA prepared by aqueous RAFT photo-PISA (Fig. 15A) [164]. In the paper, the permeable nature of the PHPMA membrane was discussed for the first time. The PHPMA membranes were highly hydrated; thus, small molecules could get in and out of vesicles, while the enzymes were confined in the cavities. A range of functional enzymes, such as HRP and GOx, had been successfully encapsulated into polymeric vesicles, and the enzymes also remained active owing to the permeability of the membrane. GOx consumed d-glucose, simultaneously producing δ-glucono-1,5-lactone and H2O2 as accessory substance. Then, the produced H2O2 was used to catalyze the oxidation of 3,3′dimethoxybenzidine (DMB) to a colored dimer product by HRP. Only when both enzymes and reagents existed, cascade reaction can be observed (Fig. 15B). Furthermore, cascade reaction between HRP and GOx proved the permeability of the PHPMA membrane.
Later, the same group adopted the cross-linked strategy to adjust the membrane permeability of nanoreactors. First, well-defined enzyme-loaded vesicle that self-assembled by PEG-b-P(HPMA-co-GlyMA) BCPs was prepared at ambient reaction condition by photo-PISA [165]. The pendant epoxide groups of PGlyMA units in the hydrophobic layer provided the opportunity to react with amino groups to achieve cross-linking effect. Next, various kinds of primary amines, such as PEG diamines and linear aliphatic diamine, were used to cross the membranes of these vesicles. However, the obtained enzyme-loaded vesicles all showed decreased enzyme activity, which was ascribed to decreased membrane permeability. Among them, the vesicle cross-linked by hydrophobic amines could reduce permeability up to 80%. In general, the increased thickness and reduced permeability as a result of membrane cross-linking adjusted the enzyme activity by controlling the diffusion process of substrates. This study provided a robust strategy to tune the membrane permeability, which may have irreplaceable guiding significance on the future design of nanoreactors.
Although changing the DP of hydrophobic block or copolymerizing with other monomers can adjust the membrane permeability, the vesicle morphology may also change. Recently, well-defined copolymer vesicles with tunable membrane thicknesses and compositions prepared by aqueous seeded photo-PISA were used as enzymatic nanoreactors [166]. By copolymerizing with HPMA or other functional monomers, vesicles with various compositions and membrane thicknesses could be successfully fabricated, without changing the vesicle morphology. Notably, given the size-selective permeability of the PHPMA membrane, the HRP-loaded vesicles could oxidize 2,2′-azinobis (3ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) into ABTS+ in the presence of H2O2. By tuning membrane thickness or hydrophobicity, the enzymatic reaction rate could be finely adjusted.
In recent years, the number of novel antibiotics entering the clinic is gradually decreasing, and the threat of antibiotic resistance is gradually increasing. Based on the forecast, the bacterial infections will become the leading cause of death in the near future [167,168]. Therefore, novel and effective antimicrobial agents have been explored to fight against bacterial infections. Therein, combining antimicrobial enzymes and polymeric nanoreactors is a potential method to overcome microbial infections. In the past, honey was used as natural antimicrobial medicine, which is contributed to the H2O2 generated by GOx in honey. Encapsulation of GOx into polymeric nanoreactors can maintain the activity of enzyme, thus providing antibacterial properties. The PEG113-b-PHPMA400 vesicles were prepared by thermal-initiated aqueous RAFT-PISA at 37 °C, and GOx was encapsulated during the assembly process with an encapsulation efficiency of about 24% (Fig. 16A) [169]. The catalytic activity of nanoreactors was characterized under various glucose concentrations, in which higher glucose concentration produced more H2O2. Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis were chosen to investigate the antimicrobial properties of GOx-loaded nanoreactors. When incubated with the GOx-loaded nanoreactors for 24 h, the growth of 2 Gram-positive staphylococcal strains was inhibited (Fig. 16B). According to colony-counting assay, the GOx-loaded nanoreactors reduced bacterial growth by 5 logs for S. aureus and 6 logs for S. epidermidis in the presence of 170 mg l−1 glucose concentration. Furthermore, the antibacterial universality of GOx-loaded nanoreactors was also investigated by conducting antibacterial tests with Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Notably, the growth of K. pneumoniae could be reduced at 800 mg l−1 glucose concentration. However, the reduced growth of E. coli was achieved at 5,170 mg l−1 glucose concentration, which was far higher than the normal glucose concentration in human body. In general, the antimicrobial property of GOx-loaded nanoreactors was highly effective for most strains of bacteria. In addition, in view of the sensitivity of fibroblasts to H2O2, the concentration of GOx-loaded nanoreactors could be decreased to 0.69 mg ml−1 (Fig. 16C).
As known, short cationic peptides can combine with phospholipid head-groups on the bacterial membranes and further promote cell death. Therefore, most antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are cationic peptides. Similar to small molecule drugs, AMPs also suffer from poor stability, salt sensitivity, and toxicity. Therefore, AMP-containing NPs can be prepared by PISA to overcome the above limitations. The polylysine macro-CTA was chain-extended with HPMA monomers under aqueous condition to prepare NPs with various morphologies [170]. Furthermore, the various NPs were used to investigate the antimicrobial property of Gram-positive bacterium. The experimental results showed that the spherical NPs consisting of polylysine-b-PHPMA12 had a 99.96% bacteria removal, which was significantly high compared with worms and vesicles. The higher AMP content and the larger specific surface area of spherical NPs were the main reasons for the result. Notably, the polylysine-b-PHPMA12 NPs could be used to prepare film membranes, and then the membranes were applied to filter the water containing S. epidermidis.
Over the past decade, with the development of polymerization technology, a range of monomers can be applied to PISA for the preparation of NPs. Notably, PISA has shown many advantages in fabrication of various nanoplatforms especially in terms of high efficiency and labor-saving. Among the various PISA formulations, RAFT-PISA is mostly investigated and used. The related reaction mechanism and morphology control have been thoroughly studied. However, nondegradable carbon–carbon skeletons and the biotoxicity of thioester functional groups are not good for biomedical application. Other PISA formulations (e.g., NMP-PISA and ATRP-PISA) can provide complement to RAFT-PISA. Especially, NCA-PISA is an emerging PISA approach. Considering facile synthesis and excellent biocompatibility of polypeptides, some pioneering work has already been reported. The biomedical nanoplatforms fabricated by PISA have been used in the field of bioimaging, disease treatment, biocatalysis, and antimicrobial. As a robust technique to scale up preparation of NPs, PISA is able to encapsulate functional molecules for various applications. However, the development of functional nanoplatforms by PISA is still in its infancy, and many issues should be solved in the future.
1. The types of monomers suitable for PISA are worthy of more exploration. In recent years, with the development of controllable polymerization technology, more monomers can be used in PISA formulations. However, compared with traditional self-assembly method, PISA formulations should consider the solubility of the monomer and the choice of solvent, which resulted in a relatively small number of suitable monomers. More specifically, a range of functional BCPs have been designed to construct nanoplatforms by traditional self-assembly. In comparison, the nanoplatform constructed by PISA still needs further improvements. Therefore, it is necessary to expand the scope of monomers. In consideration of the high efficiency of PISA method, more efforts should be used.
2. Current biomedical nanoplatforms constructed by PISA are relatively simple and very limited. More biology-related experiments should be conducted to prove the great potential of PISA in fabricating biomedical platforms. In additional, most of the studies are based on RAFT-PISA, which may bring biotoxicity into polymeric nanoplatforms. There are convenient ways to eliminate the end groups of CTAs, which undoubtedly introduce complexity into the PISA process. Notably, emerging NCA-PISA that has both high biocompatibility and mild preparation is extraordinary. Therefore, exploring more NCA monomers that have stimuli-responsive characteristics can be taken into account and may boost future development of PISA.
3. The encapsulation efficiency of functional molecules by PISA is still challenging. For biomedical applications, the current approach is to physically encapsulate these molecules in the cavities of fabricated vesicles. However, the encapsulation efficiency is unsatisfactory and the purification is complex. In addition, the release of encapsulated molecules is also not controllable in most PISA instances. In fact, pH response, enzyme response, light response, magnetic response, and ultrasonic response can be introduced into the PISA system to control local release. Therefore, designing prodrug monomers or conjugating functional molecules to monomers via stimuli-responsive linkages are worth considering. This strategy not only improves the encapsulation efficiency but also allows for controlled release.
4. The broad application of PISA needs to be further explored. In addition to its biomedical application, PISA can also be applied in the field of nanocomposites, functional coatings, hydrogel, and so on. PISA technology has a significant potential in a variety of application areas. Although the PISA technology has been developed for many years, its application is still in the exploration and preliminary stage. Therefore, more effort should be put to enrich the application of PISA.
1.
Chen J, Li K, Shon JSL, Zimmerman SC. Single-chain nanoparticle delivers a partner enzyme for concurrent and tandem catalysis in cells. J Am Chem Soc. 2020;142(10):4565–4569.
2.
Mout R, Moyano DF, Rana S, Rotello VM. Surface functionalization of nanoparticles for nanomedicine. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41(7):2539–2544.
3.
Cabral H, Miyata K, Osada K, Kataoka K. Block copolymer micelles in nanomedicine applications. Chem Rev. 2018;118(14):6844–6892.
4.
Lee J, Kim SM, Lee IS. Functionalization of hollow nanoparticles for nanoreactor applications. Nano Today. 2014;9(5):631–667.
5.
Chen J, Pan S, Zhou J, Lin Z, Qu Y, Glab A, Han Y, Richardson JJ, Caruso F. Assembly of bioactive nanoparticles via metal-phenolic complexation. Adv Mater. 2022;34(10):2108624.
6.
Wang X, Dong Q, Qiao H, Huang Z, Saray MT, Zhong G, Lin Z, Cui M, Brozena A, Hong M, et al.Continuous synthesis of hollow high-entropy nanoparticles for energy and catalysis applications. Adv Mater. 2020;32(46):2002853.
7.
Yu G, Zhao X, Zhou J, Mao Z, Huang X, Wang Z, Hua B, Liu Y, Zhang F, He Z, et al.Supramolecular polymer-based nanomedicine: High therapeutic performance and negligible long-term immunotoxicity. J Am Chem Soc. 2018;140(25):8005–8019.
8.
Mai YY, Eisenberg A. Self-assembly of block copolymers. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41(18):5969–5985.
9.
Zhang LF, Eisenberg A. Multiple morphologies of “crew-cut” aggregates of polystyrene-b-poly(acrylic acid) block copolymers. Science. 1995;268(5218):1728–1731.
10.
Wang YG, Zhou KJ, Huang G, Hensley C, Huang X, Ma X, Zhao T, Sumer BD, DeBerardinis RJ, Gao J. A nanoparticle-based strategy for the imaging of a broad range of tumours by nonlinear amplification of microenvironment signals. Nat Mater. 2014;13(2):204–212.
11.
Liu H, Wang R, Wei J, Cheng C, Zheng Y, Pan Y, He X, Ding M, Tan H, Fu Q. Conformation-directed micelle-to-vesicle transition of cholesterol-decorated polypeptide triggered by oxidation. J Am Chem Soc. 2018;140(21):6604–6610.
12.
Zhang P, Zhang Y, Ding XY, Shen W, Li M, Wagner E, Xiao C, Chen X. A multistage cooperative nanoplatform enables intracellular co-delivery of proteins and chemotherapeutics for cancer therapy. Adv Mater. 2020;32(46):2000013.
13.
Charleux B, Delaittre G, Rieger J, D’Agosto F. Polymerization-induced self-assembly: From soluble macromolecules to block copolymer nano-objects in one step. Macromolecules. 2012;45(17):6753–6765.
14.
Penfold NJW, Yeow J, Boyer C, Armes SP. Emerging trends in polymerization-induced self-assembly. ACS Macro Lett. 2019;8(8):1029–1054.
15.
Six J, Ferji K. Polymerization induced self-assembly: An opportunity toward the self-assembly of polysaccharide-containing copolymers into high-order morphologies. Polym Chem. 2019;10(1):45–53.
16.
Cao JP, Tan YX, Chen Y, Zhang L, Tan J. Expanding the scope of polymerization-induced self-assembly: Recent advances and new horizons. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2021;42(23):2100498.
17.
Armes SP, Perrier S, Zetterlund PB. Introduction to polymerisation-induced self assembly. Polym Chem. 2021;12(1):8–11.
18.
Derry MJ, Fielding LA, Armes SP. Polymerization-induced self-assembly of block copolymer nanoparticles via RAFT non-aqueous dispersion polymerization. Prog Polym Sci. 2016;52:1–18.
19.
Warren NJ, Armes SP. Polymerization-induced self-assembly of block copolymer nano-objects via RAFT aqueous dispersion polymerization. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136(29):10174–10185.
20.
Fan B, Wan J, Zhai JL, Chen X, Thang SH. Triggered degradable colloidal particles with ordered inverse bicontinuous cubic and hexagonal mesophases. ACS Nano. 2021;15(3):4688–4698.
21.
Lv F, An ZS, Wu PY. Scalable preparation of alternating block copolymer particles with inverse bicontinuous mesophases. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):Article 1397.
22.
Luo X, An ZS. Polymerization-induced self-assembly for the preparation of poly(N,N-dimethylacrylamide)-b-poly(4-tert-butoxystyrene-co-pentafluorostyrene) particles with inverse bicontinuous phases. Chin J Chem. 2021;39(7):1819–1824.
23.
Cornel EJ, Jiang JH, Chen S, du J. Principles and characteristics of polymerization-induced self-assembly with various polymerization techniques. CCS Chemistry. 2021;3(4):2104–2125.
24.
Liu C, Hong CY, Pan CY. Polymerization techniques in polymerization-induced self-assembly (PISA). Polym Chem. 2020;11(22):3673–3689.
25.
Le D, Keller D, Delaittre G. Reactive and functional nanoobjects by polymerization-induced self-assembly. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2019;40(2):1800551.
26.
Zhou W, Qu QW, Xu YY, An Z. Aqueous polymerization-induced self-assembly for the synthesis of ketone-functionalized nano-objects with low polydispersity. ACS Macro Lett. 2015;4(5):495–499.
27.
Xu S, Ng G, Xu JT, Kuchel RP, Yeow J, Boyer C. 2-(methylthio)ethyl methacrylate: A versatile monomer for stimuli responsiveness and polymerization-induced self-assembly in the presence of air. ACS Macro Lett. 2017;6(11):1237–1244.
28.
Chen M, Li JW, Zhang WJ, Hong CY, Pan CY. pH- and reductant-responsive polymeric vesicles with robust membrane-cross-linked structures: In situ cross-linking in polymerization-induced self-assembly. Macromolecules. 2019;52(3):1140–1149.
29.
Rosselgong J, Blanazs A, Chambon P, Williams M, Semsarilar M, Madsen J, Battaglia G, Armes SP. Thiol-functionalized block copolymer vesicles. ACS Macro Lett. 2012;1(8):1041–1045.
30.
Lovett JR, Ratcliffe LPD, Warren NJ, Armes SP, Smallridge MJ, Cracknell RB, Saunders BR. A robust cross-linking strategy for block copolymer worms prepared via polymerization-induced self-assembly. Macromolecules. 2016;49(8):2928–2941.
31.
Canning SL, Smith GN, Armes SP. A critical appraisal of RAFT-mediated polymerization-induced self-assembly. Macromolecules. 2016;49(6):1985–2001.
32.
Phan H, Taresco V, Penelle J, Couturaud B. Polymerisation-induced self-assembly (PISA) as a straightforward formulation strategy for stimuli-responsive drug delivery systems and biomaterials: Recent advances. Biomater Sci. 2021;9(1):38–50.
33.
An N, Chen X, Yuan JY. Non-thermally initiated RAFT polymerization-induced self-assembly. Polym Chem. 2021;12(22):3220–3232.
34.
Zhang WJ, Hong CY, Pan CY. Polymerization-induced self-assembly of functionalized block copolymer nanoparticles and their application in drug delivery. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2019;40(2):Article e1800279.
35.
Delaittre G, Nicolas J, Lefay C, Save M, Charleux B. Surfactant-free synthesis of amphiphilic diblock copolymernanoparticles via nitroxide-mediated emulsion polymerization. Chem Commun. 2005;5:614–616.
36.
Delaittre G, Dire C, Rieger J, Putaux J-L, Charleux B. Formation of polymer vesicles by simultaneous chain growth and self-assembly of amphiphilic block copolymers. Chem Commun. 2009;(20):2887–2889.
37.
Qiao XG, Lansalot M, Bourgeat-Lami E, Charleux B. Nitroxide-mediated polymerization-induced self-assembly of poly(poly(ethylene oxide) methyl ether methacrylate-co-styrene)-b-poly(n-butyl methacrylate-co-styrene) amphiphilic block copolymers. Macromolecules. 2013;46(11):4285–4295.
38.
Yoshida E. Preparation of giant vesicles containing quaternary ammonium salt of 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate through photo nitroxide-mediated controlled/living radical polymerization-induced self-assembly. J Polym Res. 2018;25(5):109–121.
39.
Yoshida E. Preparation of giant vesicles supporting hindered amine on their shells through photo living radical polymerization-induced self-assembly. J Dispers Sci Technol. 2020;41(5):763–770.
40.
Qiao XG, Lambert O, Taveau JC, Dugas PY, Charleux B, Lansalot M, Bourgeat-Lami E. Nitroxide-mediated polymerization-induced self-assembly of block copolymers at the surface of silica particles: Toward new hybrid morphologies. Macromolecules. 2017;50(10):3796–3806.
41.
Wan J, Fan B, Thang SH. RAFT-mediated polymerization-induced self-assembly (RAFT-PISA): Current status and future directions. Chem Sci. 2022;13(15):4192–4224.
42.
D'Agosto F, Rieger J, Lansalot M. RAFT-mediated polymerization-induced self-assembly. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2020;59(22):8368–8392.
43.
Ratcliffe LPD, Derry MJ, Ianiro A, Tuinier R, Armes SP. A single Thermoresponsive diblock copolymer can form spheres, worms or vesicles in aqueous solution. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2019;58(52):18964–18970.
44.
Deng RH, Derry MJ, Mable CJ, Ning Y, Armes SP. Using dynamic covalent chemistry to drive morphological transitions: Controlled release of encapsulated nanoparticles from block copolymer vesicles. J Am Chem Soc. 2017;139(22):7616–7623.
45.
Chen X, An NK, Zeng M, Yuan J. Host–guest complexation modulated aqueous polymerization-induced self-assembly for monodisperse hierarchical nanoflowers. Chem Commun. 2021;57(100):13720–13723.
46.
Chen X, Liu L, Huo M, Zeng M, Peng L, Feng A, Wang X, Yuan J. Direct synthesis of polymer nanotubes by aqueous dispersion polymerization of a cyclodextrin/styrene complex. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2017;56(52):16541–16545.
47.
Depoorter J, Yan XB, Zhang B, Sudre G, Charlot A, Fleury E, Bernard J. All poly(ionic liquid) block copolymer nanoparticles from antagonistic isomeric macromolecular blocks via aqueous RAFT polymerization-induced self-assembly. Polym Chem. 2021;12(1):82–91.
48.
Cumming JM, Deane OJ, Armes SP. Reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer aqueous dispersion polymerization of 4-hydroxybutyl acrylate produces highly thermoresponsive diblock copolymer nano-objects. Macromolecules. 2022;55(3):788–798.
49.
Fielding LA, Derry MJ, Ladmiral V, Rosselgong J, Rodrigues AM, Ratcliffe LPD, Sugihara S, Armes SP. RAFT dispersion polymerization in non-polar solvents: Facile production of block copolymer spheres, worms and vesicles in N-alkanes. Chem Sci. 2013;4(5):2081.
50.
Docherty PJ, Derry MJ, Armes SP. RAFT dispersion polymerization of glycidyl methacrylate for the synthesis of epoxy-functional block copolymer nanoparticles in mineral oil. Polym Chem. 2019;10(5):603–611.
51.
György C, Hunter SJ, Girou C. Synthesis of poly(Stearyl methacrylate)-poly(2-hydroxypropyl methacrylate) diblock copolymer nanoparticles via RAFT dispersion polymerization of 2-Hydroxypropyl methacrylate in mineral oil. Polym Chem. 2020;11(28):4579–4590.
52.
Fielding LA, Lane JA, Derry MJ, Mykhaylyk OO, Armes SP. Thermo-responsive diblock copolymer worm gels in non-polar solvents. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136(15):5790–5798.
53.
Derry MJ, Fielding LA, Armes SP. Industrially-relevant polymerization-induced self-assembly formulations in non-polar solvents: RAFT dispersion polymerization of benzyl methacrylate. Polym Chem. 2015;6(16):3054–3062.
54.
Derry MJ, Fielding LA, Warren NJ, Mable CJ, Smith AJ, Mykhaylyk OO, Armes SP. In situ small-angle X-ray scattering studies of sterically-stabilized diblock copolymer nanoparticles formed during polymerization-induced self-assembly in non-polar media. Chem Sci. 2016;7(8):5078–5090.
55.
Brotherton EE, Hatton FL, Cockram AA, Derry MJ, Czajka A, Cornel EJ, Topham PD, Mykhaylyk OO, Armes SP. In situ small-angle X-ray scattering studies during reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer aqueous emulsion polymerization. J Am Chem Soc. 2019;141(34):13664–13675.
56.
Czajka A, Armes SP. In situ Saxs studies of a prototypical RAFT aqueous dispersion polymerization formulation: Monitoring the evolution in copolymer morphology during polymerization-induced self-assembly. Chem Sci. 2020;11(42):11443–11454.
57.
Häkkinen S, Tanaka J, Maset RG, Hall SCL, Huband S, Rho JY, Song Q, Perrier S. Polymerisation-induced self-assembly of graft copolymers. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2022;61(44):Article e2022105.
58.
Fan B, Wang J, Zhai J, Teo NKS, Huynh A, Thang SH. Photoluminescent polymer Cubosomes prepared by RAFT-mediated polymerization-induced self-assembly. Polym Chem. 2022;13(29):4333–4342.
59.
Blanazs A, Ryan AJ, Armes SP. Predictive phase diagrams for RAFT aqueous dispersion polymerization: Effect of block copolymer composition, molecular weight, and copolymer concentration. Macromolecules. 2012;45(12):5099–5107.
60.
Byard SJ, Williams M, Mckenzie BE, Blanazs A, Armes SP. Preparation and cross-linking of all-acrylamide diblock copolymer nano-objects via polymerization-induced self-assembly in aqueous solution. Macromolecules. 2017;50(4):1482–1493.
61.
Sobotta FH, Kuchenbrod M, Hoeppener S, Brendel JC. One polymer composition, various morphologies: The decisive influence of conditions on the polymerization-induced self-assembly (PISA) of N-acryloyl thiomorpholine. Nanoscale. 2020;12(39):20171–20176.
62.
Cockram AA, Neal TJ, Derry MJ, Mykhaylyk OO, Williams NSJ, Murray MW, Emmett SN, Armes SP. Effect of monomer solubility on the evolution of copolymer morphology during polymerization-induced self-assembly in aqueous solution. Macromolecules. 2017;50(3):796–802.
63.
Zhou DW, Dong SM, Kuchel RP, Perrier S, Zetterlund PB. Polymerization induced self-assembly: Tuning of morphology using ionic strength and pH. Polym Chem. 2017;8(20):3082–3089.
64.
Xu XF, Zhu RM, Pan CY, You YZ, Zhang WJ, Hong CY. Polymerization-induced self-assembly driven by the synergistic effects of aromatic and solvophobic interactions. Macromolecules. 2021;54(6):2729–2739.
65.
Ren H, Wei ZM, Wei HC, Yu D, Li H, Bi F, Xu B, Zhang H, Hua Z, Yang G. Pyridine-containing block copolymeric nanoassemblies obtained through complementary hydrogen-bonding directed polymerization-induced self-assembly in water. Polym Chem. 2022;13(25):3800–3805.
66.
Yao H, Ning Y, Jesson CP, He J, Deng R, Tian W, Armes SP. Using host–guest chemistry to tune the kinetics of morphological transitions undertaken by block copolymer vesicles. ACS Macro Lett. 2017;6(12):1379–1385.
67.
Xu JT, Jung K, Atme A, Shanmugam S, Boyer C. A robust and versatile photoinduced living polymerization of conjugated and unconjugated monomers and its oxygen tolerance. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136(14):5508–5519.
68.
Chen M, Johnson JA. Improving photo-controlled living radical polymerization from trithiocarbonates through the use of continuous-flow techniques. Chem Commun. 2015;51(31):6742–6745.
69.
Burridge KM, Wright TA, Page RC, Konkolewicz D. Photochemistry for well-defined polymers in aqueous media: From fundamentals to polymer nanoparticles to bioconjugates. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2018;39(12):Article e1800093.
70.
Oehlenschlaeger KK, Muellur JO, Heine NB, Glassner M, Guimard NK, Delaittre G, Schmidt FG, Barner-Kowollik C. Light-induced modular ligation of conventional RAFT polymers. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2013;52(2):762–766.
71.
Liu ZZ, Zhang GJ, Lu W, Huang Y, Zhang J, Chen T. UV light-initiated RAFT polymerization induced self-assembly. Polym Chem. 2015;6(34):6129–6132.
72.
Tan JB, Dai XC, Zhang YX, Yu L, Sun H, Zhang L. Photoinitiated polymerization-induced self-assembly via visible light-induced RAFT-mediated emulsion polymerization. ACS Macro Lett. 2019;8(2):205–212.
73.
Xu QH, Tian C, Zhang LF, Cheng Z, Zhu X. Photo-controlled polymerization-induced self-assembly (photo-PISA): A novel strategy using in situ bromine-iodine transformation living radical polymerization. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2019;40(2):Article e1800327.
74.
Tan JB, Xu Q, Zhang YF, Huang C, Li X, He J, Zhang L. Room temperature synthesis of self-assembled AB/B and ABC/BC blends by photoinitiated polymerization-induced self-assembly (photo-PISA) in water. Macromolecules. 2018;51(18):7396–7406.
75.
Zhang YX, He J, Dai XC, Yu L, Tan J, Zhang L. Combining the power of heat and light: Temperature-programmed photoinitiated RAFT dispersion polymerization to tune polymerization-induced self-assembly. Polym Chem. 2019;10(28):3902–3911.
76.
Liu DD, Yang SQ, Peng SJ, Chen Y, Zhang L, Tan J. Simultaneous synthesis and self-assembly of bottlebrush block copolymers at room temperature via photoinitiated RAFT dispersion polymerization. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2022;43(8):2100921.
77.
Yeow J, Sugita OR, Boyer C. Visible light-mediated polymerization-induced self-assembly in the absence of external catalyst or initiator. ACS Macro Lett. 2016;5(5):558–564.
78.
Tan JB, Sun H, Yu MG, Sumerlin BS, Zhang L. Photo-PISA: Shedding light on polymerization-induced self-assembly. ACS Macro Lett. 2015;4(11):1249–1253.
79.
Yang SQ, Zhang L, Chen Y, Tan J. Combining green light-activated photoiniferter RAFT polymerization and RAFT dispersion polymerization for graft copolymer assemblies. Macromolecules. 2022;55(19):8472–8484.
80.
Yu LL, Zhang YX, Dai XC, Xu Q, Zhang L, Tan J. Open-air preparation of cross-linked CO2-responsive polymer vesicles by enzyme-assisted photoinitiated polymerization-induced self-assembly. Chem Commun. 2019;55(79):11920–11923.
81.
Varlas S, Georgiou PG, Bilalis P, Jones JR, Hadjichristidis N, O’Reilly RK. Poly(sarcosine)-based nano-objects with multi-protease resistance by aqueous photoinitiated polymerization-induced self-assembly (photo-PISA). Biomacromolecules. 2018;19(11):4453–4462.
82.
Castro VLR, Nomeir B, Arteni AA, Ouldali M, Six J-L, Ferji K. Dextran-coated latex nanoparticles via photo-RAFT mediated polymerization induced self-assembly. Polymers. 2021;13(23):4064.
83.
Sun H, Cao W, Zang NZ, Clemons TD, Scheutz GM, Hu Z, Thompson MP, Liang Y, Vratsanos M, Zhou X, et al.Proapoptotic peptide brush polymer nanoparticles via photoinitiated polymerization-induced self-assembly. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2020;59(43):19136–19142.
84.
Liu ZZ, Wu CL, Fu YB, Xu X, Ying J, Sheng J, Huang Y, Ma C, Chen T. Synthesis of Janus au@BCP nanoparticles via UV light-initiated RAFT polymerization-induced self-assembly. Nanoscale Adv. 2021;3(2):347–352.
85.
Zaquen N, Yeow J, Junkers T, Boyer C, Zetterlund PB. Visible light-mediated polymerization-induced self-assembly using continuous flow reactors. Macromolecules. 2018;51(14):5165–5172.
86.
Cai WB, Liu DD, Chen Y, Zhang L, Tan JB. Enzyme-assisted photoinitiated polymerization-induced self-assembly in continuous flow reactors with oxygen tolerance. Chin J Polym Sci. 2021;39(9):1127–1137.
87.
Yeow J, Boyer C. Photoinitiated polymerization-induced self-assembly (photo-PISA): New insights and opportunities. Adv Sci. 2017;4(7):1700137.
88.
Zhang BH, Wang XJ, Zhu AQ, Ma K, Lv Y, Wang X, An Z. Enzyme-initiated reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer polymerization. Macromolecules. 2015;48(21):7792–7802.
89.
Xu Q, Zhang YX, Li XL, He J, Tan J, Zhang L. Enzyme catalysis-induced RAFT polymerization in water for the preparation of epoxy-functionalized triblock copolymer vesicles. Polym Chem. 2018;9(39):4908–4916.
90.
Xie WS, Zhao LY, Wei Y, Yuan J. Advances in enzyme-catalysis-mediated RAFT polymerization. Cell Rep Phys Sci. 2021;2(7):Article 100487.
91.
Xiong QY, Zhang XY, Wei WF, Wei G, Su Z. Enzyme-mediated reversible deactivation radical polymerization for functional materials: Principles, synthesis, and applications. Polym Chem. 2020;11(10):1673–1690.
92.
Reyhani A, Nothling MD, Ranji-Burachaloo H, McKenzie TG, Fu Q, Tan S, Bryant G, Qiao GG. Blood-catalyzed RAFT polymerization. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2018;57(32):10288–10292.
93.
Lv Y, Liu ZF, Zhu AQ, An Z. Glucose oxidase deoxygenation-redox initiation for RAFT polymerization in air. J Polym Sci A Polym Chem. 2017;55(1):164–174.
94.
Tan JB, Xu Q, Li XL, He J, Zhang Y, Dai X, Yu L, Zeng R, Zhang L. Enzyme-PISA: An efficient method for preparing well-defined polymer nano-objects under mild conditions. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2018;39(9):Article e1700871.
95.
Tan JB, Liu DD, Huang CD, Li X, He J, Xu Q, Zhang L. Photoinitiated polymerization-induced self-assembly of glycidyl methacrylate for the synthesis of epoxy-functionalized block copolymer nano-objects. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2017;38(15):1700195.
96.
Mckenzie TG, Colombo E, Fu Q, Ashokkumar M, Qiao GG. Sono-RAFT polymerization in aqueous medium. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2017;56(40):12302–12306.
97.
Piogé S, Tran TN, Mckenzie TG, Pascual S, Ashokkumar M, Fontaine L, Qiao G. Sono-RAFT polymerization-induced self-assembly in aqueous dispersion: Synthesis of LCST-type thermosensitive nanogels. Macromolecules. 2018;51(21):8862–8869.
98.
Wan J, Fan B, Liu YY, Hsia T, Qin K, Junkers T, Teo BM, Thang SH. Room temperature synthesis of block copolymer nano-objects with different morphologies via ultrasound initiated RAFT polymerization-induced self-assembly (Sono-RAFT-PISA). Polym Chem. 2020;11(21):3564–3572.
99.
Enciso AE, Fu LY, Lathwal S, Olszewski M, Wang Z, das SR, Russell AJ, Matyjaszewski K. Biocatalytic “oxygen-fueled” atom transfer radical polymerization. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2018;57(49):16157–16161.
100.
Sugihara S, Armes SP, Lewis AL. One-pot synthesis of biomimetic shell cross-linked micelles and nanocages by ATRP in alcohol/water mixtures. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2010;49(20):3500–3503.
101.
Alzahrani A, Zhou D, Kuchel RP, Zetterlund PB, Aldabbagh F. Polymerization-induced self-assembly based on ATRP in supercritical carbon dioxide. Polym Chem. 2019;1(21):2658–2665.
102.
Wan WM, Pan CY. Atom transfer radical dispersion polymerization in an ethanol/water mixture. Macromolecules. 2007;40(25):8897–8905.
103.
Sugihara S, Sugihara K, Armes SP, Ahmad H, Lewis AL. Synthesis of biomimetic poly(2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl phosphorylcholine) nanolatexes via atom transfer radical dispersion polymerization in alcohol/water mixtures. Macromolecules. 2010;43(15):6321–6329.
104.
Wang GW, Schmitt M, Wang ZY, Lee B, Pan X, Fu L, Yan J, Li S, Xie G, Bockstaller MR, et al.Polymerization-induced self-assembly (PISA) using ICAR ATRP at low catalyst concentration. Macromolecules. 2016;49(22):8605–8615.
105.
Cao MY, Zhang YX, Wang J, Fan X, Wang G. ICAR ATRP polymerization-induced self-assembly using a mixture of macroinitiator/stabilizer with different molecular weights. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2019;40(20):1900296.
106.
Wang GW, Wang ZY, Lee B, Yuan R, Lu Z, Yan J, Pan X, Song Y, Bockstaller MR, Matyjaszewski K. Polymerization-induced self-assembly of acrylonitrile via ICAR ATRP. Polymer. 2017;129:57–67.
107.
Simakova A, Averick SE, Konkolewicz D, Matyjaszewski K. Aqueous ARGET ATRP. Macromolecules. 2012;45(16):6371–6379.
108.
Shao ML, Yue XG, Yue TQ, He J. Regulating gelation time and kinetics analysis based on the ARGET ATRP mechanism. J Polym Sci. 2020;58(4):519–527.
109.
Wang J, Wu ZG, Wang GW, Matyjaszewski K. In situ crosslinking of nanoparticles in polymerization-induced self-assembly via ARGET ATRP of glycidyl methacrylate. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2019;40(2):1800332.
110.
Shi BY, Zhang H, Liu Y, Wang J, Zhou P, Cao M, Wang G. Development of ICAR ATRP–based polymerization-induced self-assembly and its application in the preparation of organic–inorganic nanoparticles. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2019;40(24):1900547.
111.
Wang K, Wang Y, Zhang W. Synthesis of diblock copolymer nano-assemblies by PISA under dispersion polymerization: Comparison between ATRP and RAFT. Polym Chem. 2017;8(41):6407–6415.
112.
Qu SW, Wang K, Khan H, Xiong W, Zhang W. Synthesis of block copolymer nano-assemblies via ICAR ATRP and RAFT dispersion polymerization: How ATRP and RAFT lead to differences. Polym Chem. 2019;10(9):1150–1157.
113.
Varlas S, Foster JC, O’Reilly RK. Ring-opening metathesis polymerization-induced self-assembly (ROMPISA). Chem Commun. 2019;55(62):9066–9071.
114.
Zhang LY, Song CM, Yu JH, Yang D, Xie M. One-pot synthesis of polymeric nanoparticle by ring-opening metathesis polymerization. J Polym Sci A Polym Chem. 2010;48(22):5231–5238.
115.
Liu JW, Liao Y, He XH, Yu J, Ding L, Xie M. Facile one-pot approach for preparing functionalized polymeric nanoparticles via ROMP. Macromol Chem Phys. 2011;212(1):55–63.
116.
Wright DB, Touve MA, Adamiak L, Gianneschi NC. ROMPISA: Ring-opening metathesis polymerization-induced self-assembly. ACS Macro Lett. 2017;6(9):925–929.
117.
Mei HG, Zhao BJ, Wang HM, Zheng S. Crosslinked polydicyclopentadiene nanoparticles via ring-opening metathesis polymerization-induced self-assembly approach. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2021;42(14):2100155.
118.
Lim J, Cho Y, Kang EH, Yang S, Pyun J, Choi TL, Char K. A one-pot synthesis of polysulfane-bearing block copolymer nanoparticles with tunable size and refractive index. Chem Commun. 2016;52(12):2485–2488.
119.
Wright DB, Thompson MP, Touve MA, Carlini AS, Gianneschi NC. Enzyme-responsive polymer nanoparticles via ring-opening metathesis polymerization-induced self-assembly. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2019;40(2):1800467.
120.
Wright DB, Touve MA, Thompson MP, Gianneschi NC. Aqueous-phase ring-opening metathesis polymerization-induced self-assembly. ACS Macro Lett. 2018;7(4):401–405.
121.
Torres-Rocha OL, Wu XW, Zhu CY, Crudden CM, Cunningham MF. Polymerization-induced self-assembly (PISA) of 1,5-cyclooctadiene using ring opening metathesis polymerization. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2019;40(2):1800326.
122.
Foster JC, Varlas S, Blackman LD, Arkinstall LA, O'Reilly RK. Ring-opening metathesis polymerization in aqueous media using a macroinitiator approach. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2018;57(33):10672–10676.
123.
Cai CH, Lin JP, Lu YQ, Zhang Q, Wang L. Polypeptide self-assemblies: Nanostructures and bioapplications. Chem Soc Rev. 2016;45(21):5985–6012.
124.
Song ZY, Han ZY, Lv SX, Chen C, Chen L, Yin L, Cheng J. Synthetic polypeptides: From polymer design to supramolecular assembly and biomedical application. Chem Soc Rev. 2017;46(21):6570–6599.
125.
Jiang JH, Zhang XY, Fan Z, du J. Ring-opening polymerization of N-carboxyanhydride-induced self-assembly for fabricating biodegradable polymer vesicles. ACS Macro Lett. 2019;8(10):1216–1221.
126.
Duro-Castano A, Rodríguez-Arco L, Ruiz-Pérez L, de Pace C, Marchello G, Noble-Jesus C, Battaglia G. One-pot synthesis of oxidation-sensitive supramolecular gels and vesicles. Biomacromolecules. 2021;22(12):5052–5064.
127.
Grazon C, Salas-Ambrosio P, Ibarboure E, Buol A, Garanger E, Grinstaff MW, Lecommandoux S, Bonduelle C. Aqueous ring-opening polymerization-induced self-assembly (ROPISA) of N-carboxyanhydrides. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2020;59(2):622–626.
128.
Grazon C, Salas-Ambrosio P, Antoine S, Ibarboure E, Sandre O, Clulow AJ, Boyd BJ, Grinstaff MW, Lecommandoux S, Bonduelle C. Aqueous ROPISA of α-amino acid N-carboxyanhydrides: Polypeptide block secondary structure controls nanoparticle shape anisotropy. Polym Chem. 2021;12(43):6242–6251.
129.
Li HL, Cornel EJ, Fan Z, Du J. Chirality-controlled polymerization-induced self-assembly. Chem Sci. 2022;13(47):14179–14190.
130.
Guégain E, Zhu C, Giovanardi E, Nicolas J. Radical ring-opening copolymerization-induced self-assembly (rROPISA). Macromolecules. 2019;52(10):3612–3624.
131.
Zhu C, Denis S, Nicolas J. A simple route to aqueous suspensions of degradable copolymer nanoparticles based on radical ring-opening polymerization-induced self-assembly (rROPISA). Chem Mater. 2022;34(4):1875–1888.
132.
Khor SY, Quinn JF, Whittaker MR, Truong NP, Davis TP. Controlling nanomaterial size and shape for biomedical applications via polymerization-induced self-assembly. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2019;40(2):Article e1800438.
133.
Suárez-García S, Solórzano R, Novio F, Alibés R, Busqué F, Ruiz-Molina D. Coordination polymers nanoparticles for bioimaging. Coord Chem Rev. 2021;432:Article 213716.
134.
Ju Q, Luo SH, Chen CX, Fang Z, Gao S, Chen G, Chen X, Gu N. Single-irradiation simultaneous dual-modal bioimaging using nanostructure scintillators as single contrast agent. Adv Healthc Mater. 2019;8(9):1801324.
135.
Su Y, Liu S, Guan YY, Xie Z, Zheng M, Jing X. Renal clearable hafnium-doped carbon dots for CT/fluorescence imaging of orthotopic liver cancer. Biomaterials. 2020;255:Article 120110.
136.
Ding YX, Zhang XY, Xu YJ, Cheng T, Ou H, Li Z, An Y, Shen W, Liu Y, Shi L. Polymerization-induced self-assembly of large-scale Iohexol nanoparticles as contrast agents for X-ray computed tomography imaging. Polym Chem. 2018;9(2):2926–2935.
137.
Zhao W, Ta HT, Zhang C, Whittaker AK. Polymerization-induced self-assembly (PISA)—Control over the morphology of 19F-containing polymeric nano-objects for cell uptake and tracking. Biomacromolecules. 2017;18(4):1145–1156.
138.
Panakkal VM, Havlicek D, Pavlova E, Filipová M, Bener S, Jirak D, Sedlacek O. Synthesis of 19F MRI nanotracers by dispersion polymerization-induced self-assembly of N-(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl)acrylamide in water. Biomacromolecules. 2022;23(11):4814–4824.
139.
Cao Y, Wang XZ, Shi XL, Clee SM, McGeer PL, Wolf MO, Orvig C. Biological imaging with medium-sensitive bichromatic flexible fluorescent dyes. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2017;56(49):15603–15606.
140.
He SS, Li JC, Lyu Y, Huang J, Pu K. Near-infrared fluorescent macromolecular reporters for real-time imaging and urinalysis of cancer immunotherapy. J Am Chem Soc. 2020;142(15):7075–7082.
141.
Guisán-Ceinos S, Rivero AR, Romeo-Gella F, Simón-Fuente S, Gómez-Pastor S, Calvo N, Orrego AH, Guisán JM, Corral I, Sanz-Rodriguez F, et al.Turn-on fluorescent biosensors for imaging hypoxia-like conditions in living cells. J Am Chem Soc. 2022;144(18):8185–8193.
142.
Wang JH, Zhu YC, Zhou SX, Wu W, Tong Q, Hu J, Min S, Hou G, Dong B, Song B. Nano-fluorophores prepared by polymerization-induced self-assembly and its application in cell imaging. Dyes Pigments. 2021;190(1):Article 109353.
143.
Tkachenko V, Kunemann P, Malval JP, Petithory T, Pieuchot L, Vidal L, Chemtob A. Kinetically stable sub-50 nm fluorescent block copolymer nanoparticles via photo-mediated RAFT dispersion polymerization for cellular imaging. Nanoscale. 2022;14(2):534–545.
144.
Zhou YC, Wang Z, Wang YQ, Li L, Zhou N, Cai Y, Zhang Z, Zhu X. Azoreductase-triggered fluorescent nanoprobe synthesized by RAFT-mediated polymerization-induced self-assembly for drug release. Polym Chem. 2020;11(35):5619–5629.
145.
Wang SY, Wang YQ, Lei HL, Li L, Cheng L, Zhou N, Zhang W, Zhang Z, Zhu X. Novel near-infrared fluorescent nanoprobe synthesized by the RAFT-mediated PISA strategy for hypoxia-triggered tumor imaging and azoreductase-responsive drug release. Macromol Chem Phys. 2022;223(15):2200055.
146.
Ladmiral V, Semsarilar M, Canton I, Armes SP. Polymerization-induced self-assembly of galactose-functionalized biocompatible diblock copolymers for intracellular delivery. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135(36):13574–13581.
147.
Phan H, Cossutta M, Houppe C, le Cœur C, Prevost S, Cascone I, Courty J, Penelle J, Couturaud B. Polymerization-induced self-assembly (PISA) for in situ drug encapsulation or drug conjugation in cancer application. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2022;618(1):173–184.
148.
Noy JM, Chen F, Akhter DT, Houston ZH, Fletcher NL, Thurecht KJ, Stenzel MH. Direct comparison of poly(ethylene glycol) and phosphorylcholine drug-loaded nanoparticles in vitro and in vivo. Biomacromolecules. 2020;21(6):2320–2333.
149.
Zhang LW, Xie LS, Xu SH, Kuchel RP, Dai Y, Jung K, Boyer C. Dual role of doxorubicin for photopolymerization and therapy. Biomacromolecules. 2020;21(9):3887–3897.
150.
Karagoz B, Esser L, Duong HT, Basuki JS, Boyer C, Davis TP. Polymerization-induced self-assembly (PISA)-control over the morphology of nanoparticles for drug delivery applications. Polym Chem. 2014;5(2):350–355.
151.
Qiu L, Xu CR, Zhong F, Hong CY, Pan CY. Fabrication of functional nano-objects through RAFT dispersion polymerization and influences of morphology on drug delivery. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8(28):18347–18359.
152.
Lv SX, Wu YC, Cai KM, He H, Li Y, Lan M, Chen X, Cheng J, Yin L. High drug loading and sub-quantitative loading efficiency of polymeric micelles driven by donor-receptor coordination interactions. J Am Chem Soc. 2018;140(4):1235–1238.
153.
Zhang WJ, Hong CY, Pan CY. Fabrication of reductive-responsive prodrug nanoparticles with superior structural stability by polymerization-induced self-assembly and functional nanoscopic platform for drug delivery. Biomacromolecules. 2016;17(9):2992–2999.
154.
Chen M, Zhang WG, Li JW, Hong CY, Zhang WJ, You YZ. Preparation of pH- and reductive-responsive prodrug nanoparticles via polymerization-induced self-assembly. Sci China Chem. 2018;61(9):1159–1166.
155.
Zhao X, Chen M, Zhang WG, Wang CH, Wang F, You YZ, Zhang WJ, Hong CY. Polymerization-induced self-assembly to produce prodrug nanoparticles with reduction-responsive camptothecin release and pH-responsive charge-reversible property. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2020;41(15):Article e2000260.
156.
Wright DB, Proetto MT, Touve MA, Gianneschi NC. Ring-opening metathesis polymerization-induced self-assembly (ROMPISA) of a cisplatin analogue for high drug-loaded nanoparticles. Polym Chem. 2019;10(23):2996–3000.
157.
Zhang QH, Zhang JM, Song J, Liu Y, Ren X, Zhao Y. Protein-based nanomedicine for therapeutic benefits of cancer. ACS Nano. 2021;15(5):8001–8038.
158.
Zhang QH, He MJ, Zhang XD, Yu H, Liu J, Guo Y, Zhang J, Ren X, Wang H, Zhao Y. Tumor microenvironment activated chemodynamic-photodynamic therapy by multistage self-assembly engineered protein nanomedicine. Adv Funct Mater. 2022;32(17):2112251.
159.
Liu XY, Sun MM, Sun JW, Hu J, Wang Z, Guo J, Gao W. Polymerization induced self-assembly of a site-specific interferon α-block copolymer conjugate into micelles with remarkably enhanced pharmacology. J Am Chem Soc. 2018;140(33):10435–10438.
160.
Blackman LD, Varlas S, Arno MC, Houston ZH, Fletcher NL, Thurecht KJ, Hasan M, Gibson MI, O’Reilly RK. Confinement of therapeutic enzymes in selectively permeable polymer vesicles by polymerization-induced self-assembly (PISA) reduces antibody binding and proteolytic susceptibility. ACS Cent Sci. 2018;4(6):718–723.
161.
Mable CJ, Canton I, Mykhaylyk OO, Ustbas Gul B, Chambon P, Themistou E, Armes SP. Targeting triple-negative breast cancer cells using dengue virus-mimicking pH-responsive framboidal triblock copolymer vesicles. Chem Sci. 2019;10(18):4811–4821.
162.
Gurnani P, Bray CP, Richardson RA, Peltier R, Perrier S. Heparin-mimicking sulfonated polymer nanoparticles via RAFT polymerization-induced self-assembly. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2019;40(2):Article e1800314.
163.
Madhavan A, Sindhu R, Binod P, Sukumaran RK, Pandey A. Strategies for design of improved biocatalysts for industrial applications. Bioresour Technol. 2017;245(Part B):1304–1313.
164.
Blackman LD, Varlas S, Arno MC, Fayter A, Gibson MI, O’Reilly RK. Permeable protein-loaded polymersome cascade nanoreactors by polymerization-induced self-assembly. ACS Macro Lett. 2017;6(11):1263–1267.
165.
Varlas S, Foster JC, Georgiou PG, Keogh R, Husband JT, Williams DS, O'Reilly RK. Tuning the membrane permeability of polymersome nanoreactors developed by aqueous emulsion polymerization-induced self-assembly. Nanoscale. 2019;11(26):12643–12654.
166.
Zhang QC, Wang RM, Chen Y, Zhang L, Tan J. Block copolymer vesicles with tunable membrane thicknesses and compositions prepared by aqueous seeded photoinitiated polymerization-induced self-assembly at room temperature. Langmuir. 2022;38(8):2699–2710.
167.
Lakshminarayanan R, Ye EY, Young DJ, Li Z, Loh XJ. Recent advances in the development of antimicrobial nanoparticles for combating resistant pathogens. Adv Healthc Mater. 2018;7(13):Article e1701400.
168.
Lama SJ, Wong EHH, Boyer C, Qiao GG. Antimicrobial polymeric nanoparticles. Prog Polym Sci. 2018;76:40–64.
169.
Blackman LD, Oo ZY, Qu Y, Gunatillake PA, Cass P, Locock KES. Antimicrobial honey-inspired glucose-responsive nanoreactors by polymerization-induced self-assembly. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12(10):11353–11362.
170.
Luppi L, Babut T, Petit E, Rolland M, Quemener D, Soussan L, Moradi MA, Semsarilar M. Antimicrobial polylysine decorated nanostructures prepared through polymerization induced self-assembly (PISA). Polym Chem. 2019;10:336–344.
Year 2023 volume 6 Issue 4
PDF
89
47
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.34133/research.0113
  • Receive Date:2023-01-12
  • Online Date:2026-10-28
  • Published:2023-04-20
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2023-01-12
  • Accepted:2023-03-19
Affiliations
    School of Flexible Electronics (Future Technologies) and Institute of Advanced Materials (IAM), Nanjing Tech University (NanjingTech), Nanjing 211816, P. R. China.

Corresponding:

* Address correspondence to:
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/research/EN/10.34133/research.0113
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT