收藏切换
Crystalline Structure-Dependent Mechanical and Thermoelectric Performance in Ag2Se1‐xSx System
收藏切换
PDF
Jiasheng Liang1, 2, Pengfei Qiu1, Yuan Zhu3, Hui Huang1, 2, Zhiqiang Gao1, 2, 4, Zhen Zhang3, Xun Shi1, Lidong Chen1, 2
Research. Vol 2020 Article ID 6591981
Less
收藏切换
Research. Vol 2020 Article ID 6591981
• Research Article •
Crystalline Structure-Dependent Mechanical and Thermoelectric Performance in Ag2Se1‐xSx System
Full
Jiasheng Liang1, 2, Pengfei Qiu1, Yuan Zhu3, Hui Huang1, 2, Zhiqiang Gao1, 2, 4, Zhen Zhang3, Xun Shi1, Lidong Chen1, 2
Affiliations
  • 1State Key Laboratory of High Performance Ceramics and Superfine Microstructure, Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200050, China
  • 2Center of Materials Science and Optoelectronics Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • 3Division of Solid-State Electronics, Department of Electrical Engineering, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
  • 4School of Physical Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China
About Author:

Authors’ Contributions

P.Q., X.S., and L.C. conceived the idea. J.L. conducted the synthesis, TE transport property measurement, and bending test. Z.G. and H.H. conducted the Hall measurement and Vickers hardness measurements. J.L, P.Q., Y.Z. and Z.Z. contributed to data analysis, model interpretation, and paper drafting. J.L., P.Q., and X.S. completed the writing of the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and gave comments regarding the manuscript.

Published: 2020-07-20 doi: 10.34133/2020/6591981
Outline
收藏切换

Self-powered wearable electronics require thermoelectric materials simultaneously with a high dimensionless figure of merit (zT) and good flexibility to convert the heat discharged by the human body into electricity. Ag2(S,Se)-based semiconducting materials can well satisfy these requirements, and thus, they are attracting great attention in thermoelectric society recently. Ag2(S,Se) crystalizes in an orthorhombic structure or monoclinic structure, depending on the detailed S/Se atomic ratio, but the relationship between its crystalline structure and mechanical/thermoelectric performance is still unclear to date. In this study, a series of Ag2Se1‐xSx (x=0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.45) samples were prepared and their mechanical and thermoelectric performance dependence on the crystalline structure was systematically investigated. x=0.3 in the Ag2Se1‐xSx system was found to be the transition boundary between orthorhombic and monoclinic structures. Mechanical property measurement shows that the orthorhombic Ag2Se1‐xSx samples are brittle while the monoclinic Ag2Se1‐xSx samples are ductile and flexible. In addition, the orthorhombic Ag2Se1‐xSx samples show better electrical transport performance and higher zT than the monoclinic samples under a comparable carrier concentration, most likely due to their weaker electron-phonon interactions. This study sheds light on the further development of flexible inorganic TE materials.

Jiasheng Liang, Pengfei Qiu, Yuan Zhu, Hui Huang, Zhiqiang Gao, Zhen Zhang, Xun Shi, Lidong Chen. Crystalline Structure-Dependent Mechanical and Thermoelectric Performance in Ag2Se1‐xSx System[J]. Research, 2020 , 2020 (7) : 6591981 - . DOI: 10.34133/2020/6591981
Recently, thermoelectric (TE) technology shows a great potential to be used as a sustainable power source in wearable electronics [1–3]. Via harvesting the heat discharged by the human body and converting it into electricity, the wearable electronics using TE technology can be self-powered without using any external batteries. The energy conversion efficiency of a TE material is determined by the dimensionless figure of merit, zT=α2σT/κ, where α is the Seebeck coefficient, σ is the electrical conductivity, κ is the thermal conductivity, and T is the absolute temperature. The TE material used in wearable electronics should possess high zT to maximize the energy conversion efficiency and good flexibility to match the curved surface of skin and endure repeated bending during service [4–6].
To date, Bi2Te3-based alloys are still the best room-temperature TE materials, but their application in wearable electronics is limited due to their inherent brittleness [7–14]. In contrast, the organic TE polymers show good flexibility, but their zTs are low [15–20]. Recently, we reported a class of Ag2S-based flexible inorganic TE materials with excellent intrinsic flexibility and high zTs [21]. Monoclinic Ag2S shows surprisingly high ductility at room temperature due to its wrinkled layer structure (space group P21/n, with the sketch map shown in Figure 1(a), and weak Ag-S chemical bonds [22, 23]. However, its relatively wide band gap (around 1 eV) yields low σ only in the order of 10-1 S m-1. As a result, zT of the stoichiometric Ag2S around room temperature is very poor. Alloying Se or/and Te in Ag2S can significantly improve σ and enhance zT to 0.26 for Ag2S0.5Se0.5 and 0.44 for Ag2S0.5Se0.45Te0.05 at 300 K. Particularly, previous study showed that the good ductility can be well maintained when the Se alloying content in Ag2S reaches 50% or the Te alloying content reaches 20%, enabling these materials very suitable to be used in flexible wearable electronics. The above results arouse great interest on the Ag2S-based materials in TE society [21, 23–25].
Being different with ductile Ag2S, Ag2Se is a brittle material. It adopts an orthorhombic structure (space group P212121) with the sketch map shown in Figure 1(b). The band gap of orthorhombic Ag2Se is around 0.2 eV, about one-fifth of that of monoclinic Ag2S. Orthorhombic Ag2Se has very high carrier mobility (~103 cm-2 V-1 S-1), excellent σ (~105 S m-1), and extremely low lattice thermal conductivity (~0.3-0.5 W m-1 K-1), resulting in high zT about 0.4~1.0 at 300 K [26–32]. Despite the different crystalline structures of Ag2S and Ag2Se, Bindi and Pingitore [33] reported that Ag2S and Ag2Se can form a continuous solid solution. The room-temperature crystalline structure of Ag2S1‐xSex solid solution is the same with the monoclinic Ag2S when x≤0.6, but the same with the orthorhombic Ag2Se when x≥0.7. Considering that the carrier concentration of Ag2Se is about several orders of magnitude higher than that of Ag2S [22], Ag2S1‐xSex solid solution might process continuous adjustable carrier concentrations and TE properties. The mechanical properties and TE performance of Ag2Se1‐xSx (0.5≤x≤1) have been already reported previously [33], but those of Ag2Se1‐xSx (0≤x≤0.5) have not been investigated yet. Particularly, the relationship between crystalline structure and mechanical/TE performance for Ag2Se1‐xSx solid solution is still unclear so far.
In this study, a series of polycrystalline Ag2Se1‐xSx (x=0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.45) samples were prepared. Their crystalline structures, mechanical properties, and TE properties were systematically investigated. x=0.3 in the Ag2Se1‐xSx system was identified to be the transition boundary of the orthorhombic structure and monoclinic structure. Orthorhombic Ag2Se1‐xSx (x=0, 0.1, and 0.2) samples are brittle, while monoclinic Ag2Se1‐xSx (x=0.4 and 0.45) are ductile and flexible. Due to the stronger electron-phonon interaction, monoclinic Ag2Se0.6S0.4 has lower PF and zT than orthorhombic Ag2Se1‐xSx (x=0, 0.1, and 0.2). However, the superior TE performance and thermal stability to the organic TE materials and the intrinsically good flexibility still promise a great potential for monoclinic Ag2Se1‐xSx to be used in wearable electronics.
Figure 1(c) shows the X-ray diffraction patterns for the prepared Ag2Se1‐xSx (x=0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.45) obtained at room temperature. When the S content x<0.3, the diffraction peaks are well indexed to the orthorhombic structure of Ag2Se with the space group of P212121. This indicates that Ag2Se0.9S0.1 and Ag2Se0.8S0.2 still adopt the same crystalline structure with Ag2Se at room temperature. When x=0.4 and 0.45, the diffraction peaks agree well with the monoclinic structure of Ag2S phase with the space group of P21/n. Likewise, the Ag2Se1‐xSx (x≥0.5) samples also crystalize in the same monoclinic structure of Ag2S [21]. Elemental energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) mappings confirm that all elements are homogeneously distributed in Ag2Se0.9S0.1, Ag2Se0.8S0.2, Ag2Se0.6S0.4, and Ag2Se0.55S0.45. No obvious secondary phase is observed. Thus, these samples are phase pure. Likewise, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) performed on the cross-section of Ag2Se0.6S0.4 indicates that it has an obvious layered structure (cf. Fig. S1).
One special composition in the Ag2Se1‐xSx system is Ag2Se0.7S0.3. As shown in Figure 1(c), its X-ray diffraction pattern looks like that of monoclinic Ag2Se0.6S0.4. However, besides those belonging to the monoclinic structure, some extra diffraction peaks with weak intensities are also observed, such as (102) at 2θ=31° and (112) at 2θ=34° (right panel in Figure 1(c)). These are indexed to the orthorhombic structure. Thus, Ag2Se0.7S0.3 is believed to be a mixture rather than a pure phase, in which the main phase crystalizes in the monoclinic structure while the secondary phase crystalizes in the orthorhombic structure. This result is different from that proposed by Bindi and Pingitore [33] that Ag2Se0.7S0.3 crystalizes in the same orthorhombic structure with Ag2Se. Figure 1(d) shows the EDS mappings performed on Ag2Se0.7S0.3. Surprisingly, all elements are still homogeneously distributed. Thus, it is concluded that the two different phases in Ag2Se0.7S0.3 have very similar chemical compositions but different crystalline structures. A similar polymorphic feature has been also observed in the Cu2Se1‐xSx system [34]. Combining the above result, it can be concluded that the transition boundary between the monoclinic and orthorhombic structures in Ag2S1‐xSex solid solution should be around x=0.3.
Ag2Se1‐xSx (x=0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.45) samples possess structure-dependent mechanical properties. The three-point bending test and Vickers hardness test were performed on Ag2Se1‐xSx. The material with larger bending deformation or small Vickers hardness is usually a benefit for the application in flexible electronics [2, 3, 6]. Figure 2(a) shows that orthorhombic Ag2Se can only endure a very small bending strain before cracking. The maximum bending deformation is about 0.56%. Likewise, orthorhombic Ag2Se0.9S0.1 also possesses a maximum bending deformation around 1.5%. The case is different for monoclinic Ag2Se0.6S0.4, which exhibits a bending deformation above 10% without cracking. Previously, large bending deformation was also observed for monoclinic Ag2Se1‐xSx (x=0.5, 0.7, 0.9, and 1) in the bending test. It should be noted that such deformation is plastic, which is different from the elastic deformation of brittle materials with low dimension. Likewise, Vickers hardness for orthorhombic Ag2Se is 43.7 Hv at room temperature. It is monotonously increased to 51.5 Hv and 62.7 Hv for the orthorhombic Ag2Se0.9S0.1 and Ag2Se0.8S0.2, respectively. However, monoclinic Ag2Se0.6S0.4 has low Vickers hardness of only 33.8 Hv, about half of that for orthorhombic Ag2Se0.8S0.2. As shown in Figure 2(c), Ag2Se0.6S0.4 can be directly cut into thin strips with thickness about 0.1 mm like metal. Furthermore, these metal-like strips can be twisted into various shapes without cracking, confirming that Ag2Se0.6S0.4 has good ductility and flexibility.
The above test results prove that the monoclinic structure has significantly better ductility and flexibility in the Ag2Se1‐xSx system. The high cleavage energy and low slipping energy, related to the unique wrinkled layer structure, are the fundamental reason for the good ductility observed in monoclinic Ag2Se1‐xSx. Previous investigation found that the S atoms in monoclinic Ag2S always bonded to part of the surrounding Ag atoms during slipping [22, 35], which is benefit for preventing the material’s cleavage under mechanical stress. Likewise, it enables the bonding energy between Ag and S atoms to change fluently, yielding a low energy barrier for slipping. However, in the orthorhombic structure, such unique wrinkled layer structure does not exist; thus, the orthorhombic Ag2Se1‐xSx samples are brittle. Here, it should be noted that although the main phase in Ag2Se0.7S0.3 crystalizes in the monoclinic structure, Ag2Se0.7S0.3 still has low maximum bending deformation around 0.88%. The reason should be attributed to the presence of brittle orthorhombic grains among the ductile monoclinic grains. The second phase strengthening effect caused by these brittle orthorhombic grains will impede the movement of atoms, dislocations, or interfaces under mechanical stress like that in the pure orthorhombic phase, yielding poor ductility for Ag2Se0.7S0.3.
Figure 3 shows the measured σ and α for Ag2Se1‐xSx (x=0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.45). All samples possess negative α, indicating that they are n-type semiconductors with electrons dominating the electrical transports. This scenario is the same with those Ag2Se1‐xSx (x≥0.5) samples. Obvious σ and α discontinuous jumps are observed between 360 K and 420 K, which are attributed to the orthorhombic-cubic or monoclinic-cubic phase transition. For example, Ag2Se experiences orthorhombic-cubic phase transition around 410 K. At 300 K, σ for Ag2Se is about 1.4×105 S·m-1. It increases with increasing temperature, reaching around 3.1×105 S·m-1 at 403 K, and then decreases to 1.9×105 S·m-1 after the phase transition. The σ value for Ag2Se0.55S0.45 at 300 K is only 3.6×104 S·m-1, almost one-fourth of the pristine Ag2Se. Likewise, the α values vary from -146  μV·K-1 to -105  μV·K-1 at 300 K and from -45  μV·K-1 to -109  μV·K-1 at 420 K, without obvious chemical composition dependence. Furthermore, Fig. S2 shows that the prepared samples have good reproducibility. When the chemical composition and fabrication process are fixed, different batches of samples have comparable σ and α data.
With the purpose to understand the electrical transport properties of Ag2Se1‐xSx, Hall measurements were performed. The Hall carrier concentration (nH) and mobility (μH) at 300 K are listed in Table SI. All Ag2Se1‐xSx samples possess nH in the order of 1018 cm-3. However, being similar with the above measured σ and α, the nH values do not have monotonous variation with the sulfur content. The different contents of intrinsic defects inside the lattice, such as Ag interstitials, are expected to be the reason for this scenario. Likewise, the μH values for the Ag2Se1‐xSx samples are in the range of 309 cm2·V-1·s-1 to 1337 cm2·V-1·s-1. These μH values are quite high as compared with other state-of-the-art TE materials, such as 190 cm2·V-1·s-1 for n-type Bi2Te3 [36] and 48 cm2·V-1·s-1 for n-type filled skutterudites [37]. A single parabolic model (SPB) is used to further understand the electrical transports of Ag2Se1‐xSx. According to the SPB model, the Seebeck coefficient, carrier concentration, and carrier mobility can be correlated as follows [38–40]:
(1)α=κBe2+λFλ+1η1+λFλη−η,(2)nH=4π2m∗kBTh23/2F1/2ηrH,(3)μH=3π41/2+2λ1+λ1Γ2+λF2λ−1/2Fλμph,(4)μph=8π1/2eℏ4ρvl23kBT3/2m∗5/2Ξ2,(5)rH=34F1/2ηF−1/2ηF02η,
where  kB is the Boltzmann constant, λ is the scattering factor, e is the electron charge, m∗ is the density-of-state effective mass, rH is the Hall factor, ρ is the sample density, vl is the velocity of longitudinal sound waves, μph is the drift mobility for acoustic phonon scattering in the nondegenerate limit, and Ξ is the deformation potential. Fmη is the Fermi integrals, and it is given by equation Fmη=∫0∞xmdx/1+ex−η, where x represents the reduced carrier energy and η=EF/kBT is the reduced Fermi energy.
Figure 3(d) presents that the α and nH data for the present Ag2Se1‐xSx (x=0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.45) samples roughly fall around the calculated theoretical Pisarenko curve with m∗=0.25me (me is the mass of free electron) and λ=0 (acoustic phonon scattering). For comparison, the previously reported data for Ag2Se and Ag2Se0.5S0.5 are also summarized in Figure 3(d). These data also fall around the theoretical curve. This scenario suggests that all these samples might possess a similar band structure near the Fermi level, despite the fact that some of them crystalize in the monoclinic structure while others in the orthorhombic structure. This is possible because the conduction band minimums of Ag2S and Ag2Se are at the same gamma point and both of them are mainly dominated by Ag-5s electrons [21, 41]. Alloying S at the Se sites would mainly alter the valence band maximum instead of the conduction band minimum, yielding the similar m∗ mentioned above. In addition, the small m∗, about 0.25me for these Ag2(S,Se) samples, are responsible for their higher μH than those for n-type Bi2Te3 [36] and filled skutterudites [37] mentioned above.
Figure 3(e) plots the μH and nH relationship at 300 K for Ag2Se1‐xSx (x=0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.45, and 0.5). The data for Ag2Se0.7S0.3 are not included because its polymorphic feature might introduce extra boundary scattering to electrons and interrupt the understanding on the carrier mobility. As shown in Figure 3(e), under the similar nH, the Ag2Se1‐xSx (x=0, 0.1, and 0.2) samples with an orthorhombic structure have higher μH than the Ag2Se1‐xSx (x=0.4, 0.45, and 0.5) samples with a monoclinic structure. By fitting the experimental data of the μH and nH relationship using Equations (1)–(5), deformation potential values of 11 eV and 19 eV can be extracted for the orthorhombic Ag2Se1‐xSx (x=0, 0.1, and 0.2) and the monoclinic Ag2Se1‐xSx (0.4, 0.45, and 0.5), respectively. The thermal vibrations of the crystal lattice can influence the energy-band structure and perturb the carrier transports. The intensity of such interaction between electrons and phonons can be reflected by the magnitude of Ξ [42]. The lower Ξ value for the orthorhombic Ag2Se1‐xSx suggests that the electron-phonon interaction wherein is weaker than that in the monoclinic Ag2Se1‐xSx. This is responsible for the higher μH observed for the orthorhombic Ag2Se1‐xSx.
The power factors (PF) for Ag2Se1‐xSx (x=0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.45) samples calculated from the formula PF=α2·σ are shown in Figure 3(c). At 300 K, the PF value for Ag2Se reaches 22.5  μW·cm-1·K-2. It gradually decreases with increasing the S-alloying content. At 300 K, the PF for Ag2Se0.55S0.45 is just 5.2  μW·cm-1·K-2, about one-fourth of that for Ag2Se. The greatly reduced σ is responsible for the lowered PF. The PF value for Ag2Se0.6S0.4 is comparable with that for Ag2Se0.5S0.5 reported before [21, 24], about 4.8  μW·cm-1·K-2 at 300 K. Based on the SPB model, the theoretical PF vs. nH curves at 300 K can be obtained for the orthorhombic and monoclinic Ag2Se1‐xSx samples, respectively. As shown in Figure 3(f), the experimental PF and nH data basically fall around these lines. Under the comparable nH, the PF for the orthorhombic Ag2Se1‐xSx samples are much higher than those of the monoclinic Ag2Se1‐xSx samples. The reason is that the orthorhombic samples have weaker electron-phonon interaction than the monoclinic samples, which yields lower Ξ value for higher μH and PF. In addition, based on the SPB model, the optimal carrier concentration (nopt,PF) corresponding to the peak PF is around 3‐4×1018 cm-3 for both orthorhombic and monoclinic Ag2Se1‐xSx. nH for the present orthorhombic Ag2Se1‐xSx (x=0, 0.1, and 0.2) and monoclinic Ag2Se1‐xSx (x=0.4) samples are already close to this nopt,PF value.
Figure 4(a) shows κ as a function of temperature for Ag2Se1‐xSx (x=0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.45). The discontinuous jumps on the κ curves are attributed to the orthorhombic-cubic or monoclinic-cubic phase transitions. κ ranges from 0.7 W·m-1·K-1 to 1.4 W·m-1·K-1 for all samples. Ag2Se0.6S0.4 exhibits the lowest κ among all samples. κ for Ag2Se0.6S0.4 at 300 K is around 0.7 W·m-1·K-1. This value is about 36% decrement as compared with that for Ag2Se0.8S0.2. Generally, κ is composed of two parts: the electron part κe and the lattice part κL. κe can be calculated according to the Wiedemann-Franz law [43]. Figure 4(b) shows the calculated κe/κ for Ag2Se1‐xSx (x=0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.45). It can be seen that the κe/κ values are in the range of 48% to 80%, indicating that the carriers’ contribution is very important in the thermal transports. By subtracting κe from κ, κL can be obtained. The results at 300 K are listed in Table SI. They range from 0.20 W·m-1·K-1 to 0.48 W·m-1·K-1, which are very low values as compared with those for the state-of-the-art TE materials [44–49]. The proximity to the cubic superionic phase is responsible for the low κL values observed in these orthorhombic and monoclinic phases [23].
Based on the measured α, σ, and κ, zT can be calculated according to zT=α2σT/κ.zT for orthorhombic Ag2Se is around 0.6 in the whole measured temperature range, which is comparable with those reported before [28–30]. Orthorhombic Ag2Se0.9S0.1 and Ag2Se0.8S0.2 possess comparable zTs with Ag2Se. However, zTs for monoclinic Ag2Se0.6S0.4 and Ag2Se0.55S0.45 are much lower than those for orthorhombic Ag2Se. At 300 K, zT is just 0.26 for Ag2Se0.6S0.4 and 0.23 for Ag2Se0.55S0.45.
As shown in Figure 4(d), the theoretical zT vs. nH curves for orthorhombic and monoclinic Ag2Se1‐xSx samples at 300 K are given by assuming that all samples possess the same κL=0.4 W m-1 K-1. The experimental zT and nH data basically fall around these lines. Under the comparable nH, zT for the orthorhombic Ag2Se1‐xSx samples is much higher than that of the monoclinic Ag2Se1‐xSx samples because their weaker electron-phonon interaction yields lower Ξ value and larger μH for higher PF. The optimal carrier concentration (nopt,zT) corresponding to the peak zT is around 1‐2×1018 cm-3 for orthorhombic Ag2Se1‐xSx, while 2‐3×1018 cm-3 for monoclinic Ag2Se1‐xSx. nH for the present orthorhombic Ag2Se1‐xSx (x=0, 0.1, and 0.2) and monoclinic Ag2Se1‐xSx (x=0.4, 0.45, and 0.5) samples are still higher than these nopt,zT values. Thus, if their carrier concentration can be further reduced, higher zT can be expected.
Although the TE performances for ductile monoclinic Ag2Se1‐xSx are lower than those for brittle orthorhombic Ag2Se1‐xSx, their performances are still much higher than those for the organic TE materials reported before. This can be clearly reflected by the scenario shown in Figure 5. The PF values for most of the n-type TE organic TE materials are lower than 1  μW·cm-1·K-2 at 300 K. Even for the best n-type TE organic TE materials reported so far, poly(Ni-ett) [19], its PF, 3.6  μW·cm-1·K-2 at 300 K, is still lower than the present monoclinic Ag2Se1‐xSx. The superior PF values achieved in the monoclinic Ag2Se1‐xSx samples would promise high power output when they are fabricated into TE devices. In addition, most n-type organic TE materials are unstable in the air because their electron affinity is too low to stabilize the n-type dopants [2, 50]. In contrast, the present ductile monoclinic Ag2Se1‐xSx samples are inert to oxygen or water; thus, they can realize good service stability in real application. Combining the intrinsically good flexibility and ductility, these monoclinic Ag2Se1‐xSx samples show great potential to be used in wearable electronics.
In summary, this study systematically studied the crystalline structure, mechanical properties, and TE properties of Ag2Se1‐xSx (x=0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.45). Ag2Se1‐xSx samples crystalize in the orthorhombic structure when x≤0.2, while in the monoclinic structure when x≥0.4. Only the monoclinic Ag2Se1‐xSx samples possess good ductility and flexibility. Under comparable carrier concentration range, the orthorhombic Ag2Se1‐xSx samples have higher carrier mobility, larger power factor, and better zT than the monoclinic samples because they have weaker electron-phonon interaction. This leads to lower zT values of monoclinic Ag2Se1‐xSx (x=0.4 and 0.45) samples than those of the orthorhombic Ag2Se1‐xSx (x=0.1 and 0.2) samples. However, the higher PF and better thermal stability promise a great potential for monoclinic Ag2Se1‐xSx to be used in wearable electronics.
  • Vetenskapsrådet(2018-06030)
  • Shanghai Rising-Star Program(19QA1410200)
  • Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences(2016232)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China(5181101519; 91963208; 51625205)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China(2018YFB0703600)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences(121631KYSB20180060)
1
Jin H., Li J., Iocozzia J., Zeng X., Wei P. C., Yang C., Li N., Liu Z., He J. H., Zhu T., Wang J., Lin Z., and Wang S., “Hybrid organic–inorganic thermoelectric materials and devices,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 58, no. 43, pp. 15206–15226, 2019
2
Wang Y., Yang L., Shi X. L., Shi X., Chen L., Dargusch M. S., Zou J., and Chen Z. G., “Flexible thermoelectric materials and generators: challenges and innovations,” Advanced Materials, vol. 31, no. 29, article 1807916, 2019
3
Yang J. C., Mun J., Kwon S. Y., Park S., Bao Z., and Park S., “Electronic skin: recent progress and future prospects for skin-attachable devices for health monitoring, robotics, and prosthetics,” Advanced Materials, vol. 31, no. 48, article e1904765, 2019
4
Jiang Y., and Tian B., “Inorganic semiconductor biointerfaces,” Nature Reviews Materials, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 473–490, 2018
5
Yao H., Fan Z., Cheng H., Guan X., Wang C., Sun K., and Ouyang J., “Recent development of thermoelectric polymers and composites,” Macromolecular Rapid Communications, vol. 39, no. 6, article e1700727, 2018
6
Lim H. R., Kim H. S., Qazi R., Kwon Y. T., Jeong J. W., and Yeo W. H., “Advanced soft materials, sensor integrations, and applications of wearable flexible hybrid electronics in healthcare, energy, and environment,” Advanced Materials, vol. 32, no. 15, article e1901924, 2020
7
Snyder G. J., Lim J. R., Huang C.-K., and Fleurial J.-P., “Thermoelectric microdevice fabricated by a MEMS-like electrochemical process,” Nature Materials, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 528–531, 2003
8
Kim S. J., We J. H., and Cho B. J., “A wearable thermoelectric generator fabricated on a glass fabric,” Energy & Environmental Science, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 1959–1965, 2014
9
Kim S. J., Lee H. E., Choi H., Kim Y., We J. H., Shin J. S., Lee K. J., and Cho B. J., “High-performance flexible thermoelectric power generator using laser multiscanning lift-off process,” ACS Nano, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 10851–10857, 2016
10
Nan K., Kang S. D., Li K., Yu K. J., Zhu F., Wang J., Dunn A. C., Zhou C., Xie Z., Agne M. T., Wang H., Luan H., Zhang Y., Huang Y., Snyder G. J., and Rogers J. A., “Compliant and stretchable thermoelectric coils for energy harvesting in miniature flexible devices,” Science Advances, vol. 4, no. 11, article eaau5849, 2018
11
Kim F., Kwon B., Eom Y., Lee J. E., Park S., Jo S., Park S. H., Kim B. S., Im H. J., Lee M. H., Min T. S., Kim K. T., Chae H. G., King W. P., and Son J. S., “3D printing of shape-conformable thermoelectric materials using all- inorganic Bi2Te3-based inks,” Nature Energy, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 301–309, 2018
12
Feng R., Tang F., Zhang N., and Wang X., “Flexible, high-power density, wearable thermoelectric nanogenerator and self-powered temperature sensor,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 11, no. 42, pp. 38616–38624, 2019
13
Pan Y., Qiu Y., Witting I., Zhang L., Fu C., Li J. W., Huang Y., Sun F. H., He J., Snyder G. J., Felser C., and Li J. F., “Synergistic modulation of mobility and thermal conductivity in (Bi,Sb)2 Te3 towards high thermoelectric performance,” Energy & Environmental Science, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 624–630, 2019
14
Qiu J., Yan Y., Luo T., Tang K., Yao L., Zhang J., Zhang M., Su X., Tan G., Xie H., Kanatzidis M. G., Uher C., and Tang X., “3D printing of highly textured bulk thermoelectric materials: mechanically robust BiSbTe alloys with superior performance,” Energy & Environmental Science, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 3106–3117, 2019
15
Bubnova O., Khan Z. U., Malti A., Braun S., Fahlman M., Berggren M., and Crispin X., “Optimization of the thermoelectric figure of merit in the conducting polymer poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene),” Nature Materials, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 429–433, 2011
16
Sun Y., Sheng P., di C., Jiao F., Xu W., Qiu D., and Zhu D., “Organic thermoelectric materials and devices based on p- and n-type poly(metal 1,1,2,2-ethenetetrathiolate)s,” Advanced Materials, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 932–937, 2012
17
Kim G. H., Shao L., Zhang K., and Pipe K. P., “Engineered doping of organic semiconductors for enhanced thermoelectric efficiency,” Nature Materials, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 719–723, 2013
18
Zhang Q., Sun Y., Xu W., and Zhu D., “What to expect from conducting polymers on the playground of thermoelectricity: lessons learned from four high-mobility polymeric semiconductors,” Macromolecules, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 609–615, 2014
19
Sun Y., Qiu L., Tang L., Geng H., Wang H., Zhang F., Huang D., Xu W., Yue P., Guan Y. S., Jiao F., Sun Y., Tang D., di C. A., Yi Y., and Zhu D., “Flexible n-type high-performance thermoelectric thin films of poly(nickel-ethylenetetrathiolate) prepared by an electrochemical method,” Advanced Materials, vol. 28, no. 17, pp. 3351–3358, 2016
20
Zhang Q., Sun Y., Qin Y., Xu W., and Zhu D., “Two soluble polymers with lower ionization potentials: doping and thermoelectric properties,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1432–1439, 2016
21
Liang J., Wang T., Qiu P., Yang S., Ming C., Chen H., Song Q., Zhao K., Wei T. R., Ren D., Sun Y. Y., Shi X., He J., and Chen L., “Flexible thermoelectrics: from silver chalcogenides to full-inorganic devices,” Energy & Environmental Science, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 2983–2990, 2019
22
Shi X., Chen H., Hao F., Liu R., Wang T., Qiu P., Burkhardt U., Grin Y., and Chen L., “Room-temperature ductile inorganic semiconductor,” Nature Materials, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 421–426, 2018
23
Tuo W., Hong-Yi C., Peng-Fei Q., Xun S., and Li-Dong C., “Thermoelectric properties of Ag2S superionic conductor with intrinsically low lattice thermal conductivity,” Acta Physica Sinica, vol. 68, no. 9, article 90201, 2019
24
Wang T., Zhao K., Qiu P., Song Q., Chen L., and Shi X., “Aguilarite Ag4SSe thermoelectric material: natural mineral with low lattice thermal conductivity,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 11, no. 13, pp. 12632–12638, 2019
25
He S., Li Y., Liu L., Jiang Y., Feng J., Zhu W., Zhang J., Dong Z., Deng Y., Luo J., Zhang W., and Chen G., “Semiconductor glass with superior flexibility and high room temperature thermoelectric performance,” Science Advances, vol. 6, no. 15, article eaaz8423, 2020
26
Lee C., Park Y.-H., and Hashimoto H., “Effect of nonstoichiometry on the thermoelectric properties of a Ag2Se alloy prepared by a mechanical alloying process,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 101, no. 2, article 024920, 2007
27
Aliev F. F., Jafarov M. B., and Eminova V. I., “Thermoelectric figure of merit of Ag2Se with Ag and Se excess,” Semiconductors, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 977–979, 2009
28
Day T., Drymiotis F., Zhang T., Rhodes D., Shi X., Chen L., and Snyder G. J., “Evaluating the potential for high thermoelectric efficiency of silver selenide,” Journal of Materials Chemistry C, vol. 1, no. 45, pp. 7568–7573, 2013
29
Mi W., Qiu P., Zhang T., Lv Y., Shi X., and Chen L., “Thermoelectric transport of Se-rich Ag2Se in normal phases and phase transitions,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 104, no. 13, article 133903, 2014
30
Yang D., Su X., Meng F., Wang S., Yan Y., Yang J., He J., Zhang Q., Uher C., Kanatzidis M. G., and Tang X., “Facile room temperature solventless synthesis of high thermoelectric performance Ag2Se via a dissociative adsorption reaction,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 5, no. 44, pp. 23243–23251, 2017
31
Ding Y., Qiu Y., Cai K., Yao Q., Chen S., Chen L., and He J., “High performance n-type Ag2Se film on nylon membrane for flexible thermoelectric power generator,” Nature Communications, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 841, 2019
32
Lu Y., Qiu Y., Cai K., Ding Y., Wang M., Jiang C., Yao Q., Huang C., Chen L., and He J., “Ultrahigh power factor and flexible silver selenide-based composite film for thermoelectric devices,” Energy & Environmental Science, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1240–1249, 2020
33
Bindi L., and Pingitore N. E., “On the symmetry and crystal structure of aguilarite, Ag4SeS,” Mineralogical Magazine, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 21–31, 2013
34
Zhao K., Blichfeld A. B., Eikeland E., Qiu P., Ren D., Iversen B. B., Shi X., and Chen L., “Extremely low thermal conductivity and high thermoelectric performance in liquid-like Cu2Se1−xSx polymorphic materials,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 5, no. 34, pp. 18148–18156, 2017
35
Li G., An Q., Morozov S. I., Duan B., Goddard W. A. III, Zhang Q., Zhai P., and Snyder G. J., “Ductile deformation mechanism in semiconductor α-Ag2S,” npj Computational Materials, vol. 4, no. 1, 2018
36
Hao F., Xing T., Qiu P., Hu P., Wei T., Ren D., Shi X., and Chen L., “Enhanced thermoelectric performance in n-type Bi2Te3-based alloys via suppressing intrinsic excitation,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 10, no. 25, pp. 21372–21380, 2018
37
Shi X., Yang J., Salvador J. R., Chi M., Cho J. Y., Wang H., Bai S., Yang J., Zhang W., and Chen L., “Multiple-filled skutterudites: high thermoelectric figure of merit through separately optimizing electrical and thermal transports,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 133, no. 20, pp. 7837–7846, 2011
38
Goldsmid H. J. Introduction to Thermoelectricity, Springer, Berlin, vol. 121, 2010
39
Xie H., Wang H., Pei Y., Fu C., Liu X., Snyder G. J., Zhao X., and Zhu T., “Beneficial contribution of alloy disorder to electron and phonon transport in half-Heusler thermoelectric materials,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 23, no. 41, pp. 5123–5130, 2013
40
Zhao K., Blichfeld A. B., Chen H., Song Q., Zhang T., Zhu C., Ren D., Hanus R., Qiu P., Iversen B. B., Xu F., Snyder G. J., Shi X., and Chen L., “Enhanced thermoelectric performance through tuning bonding energy in Cu2Se1–xSx Liquid-like materials,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 29, no. 15, pp. 6367–6377, 2017
41
Fang C. M., de Groot R. A., and Wiegers G. A., “Ab initio band structure calculations of the low-temperature phases of Ag2Se, Ag2Te and Ag3AuSe2,” Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 457–464, 2002
42
Nolas G. S., Sharp J., and Goldsmid J. Thermoelectrics: Basic Principles and New Materials Developments, Springer Science & Business Media, vol. 45, 2013
43
Kim H. S., Gibbs Z. M., Tang Y., Wang H., and Snyder G. J., “Characterization of Lorenz number with Seebeck coefficient measurement,” APL Materials, vol. 3, no. 4, 2015
44
Shuai J., Ge B., Mao J., Song S., Wang Y., and Ren Z., “Significant role of Mg stoichiometry in designing high thermoelectric performance for Mg3(Sb,Bi)2-based n-type Zintls,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 140, no. 5, pp. 1910–1915, 2018
45
Liu Z., Mao J., Sui J., and Ren Z., “High thermoelectric performance of α-MgAgSb for power generation,” Energy & Environmental Science, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 23–44, 2018
46
Chen Z., Zhang X., and Pei Y., “Manipulation of phonon transport in thermoelectrics,” Advanced Materials, vol. 30, no. 17, article e1705617, 2018
47
Fu T., Xin J., Zhu T., Shen J., Fang T., and Zhao X., “Approaching the minimum lattice thermal conductivity of p-type SnTe thermoelectric materials by Sb and Mg alloying,” Science Bulletin, vol. 64, no. 14, pp. 1024–1030, 2019
48
Chang C., and Zhao L.-D., “Anharmoncity and low thermal conductivity in thermoelectrics,” Materials Today Physics, vol. 4, pp. 50–57, 2018
49
Wang T., Xiong Y., Wang Y., Qiu P., Song Q., Zhao K., Yang J., Xiao J., Shi X., and Chen L., “Cu3ErTe3: a new promising thermoelectric material predicated by high-throughput screening,” Materials Today Physics, vol. 12, article 100180, 2020
50
Wang S., Sun H., Ail U., Vagin M., Persson P. O. Å., Andreasen J. W., Thiel W., Berggren M., Crispin X., Fazzi D., and Fabiano S., “Thermoelectric properties of solution-processed n-doped ladder-type conducting polymers,” Advanced Materials, vol. 28, no. 48, pp. 10764–10771, 2016
51
Huang D., Yao H., Cui Y., Zou Y., Zhang F., Wang C., Shen H., Jin W., Zhu J., Diao Y., Xu W., di C. A., and Zhu D., “Conjugated-backbone effect of organic small molecules for n-type thermoelectric materials with ZT over 0.2,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 139, no. 37, pp. 13013–13023, 2017
52
Huewe F., Steeger A., Kostova K., Burroughs L., Bauer I., Strohriegl P., Dimitrov V., Woodward S., and Pflaum J., “Low-cost and sustainable organic thermoelectrics based on low-dimensional molecular metals,” Advanced Materials, vol. 29, no. 13, article 1605682, 2017
53
Yuan D., Huang D., Zhang C., Zou Y., di C. A., Zhu X., and Zhu D., “Efficient solution-processed n-type small-molecule thermoelectric materials achieved by precisely regulating energy level of organic dopants,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 9, no. 34, pp. 28795–28801, 2017
Year 2020 volume 2020 Issue 7
PDF
59
32
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.34133/2020/6591981
  • Receive Date:2020-04-21
  • Online Date:2026-10-27
  • Published:2020-07-20
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2020-04-21
  • Accepted:2020-06-17
Funding
Vetenskapsrådet(2018-06030)
Shanghai Rising-Star Program(19QA1410200)
Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences(2016232)
National Natural Science Foundation of China(5181101519; 91963208; 51625205)
National Key Research and Development Program of China(2018YFB0703600)
Chinese Academy of Sciences(121631KYSB20180060)
Affiliations
    1State Key Laboratory of High Performance Ceramics and Superfine Microstructure, Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200050, China
    2Center of Materials Science and Optoelectronics Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
    3Division of Solid-State Electronics, Department of Electrical Engineering, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
    4School of Physical Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/research/EN/10.34133/2020/6591981
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT