Home Journals Articles Updates About
CN
image
收藏切换
Next-Generation Prosthetic Hand: from Biomimetic to Biorealistic
收藏切换
PDF
Ning Lan1, 2, Manzhao Hao1, 2, Chuanxin M. Niu1, 2, 3, He Cui4, Yu Wang5, 6, Ting Zhang7, Peng Fang8, Chih-hong Chou1, 2
Research. Vol 2021 Article ID 4675326
Less
收藏切换
Research. Vol 2021 Article ID 4675326
• Perspective •
Next-Generation Prosthetic Hand: from Biomimetic to Biorealistic
Full
Ning Lan1, 2, Manzhao Hao1, 2, Chuanxin M. Niu1, 2, 3, He Cui4, Yu Wang5, 6, Ting Zhang7, Peng Fang8, Chih-hong Chou1, 2
Affiliations
  • 1Institute of Medical Robotics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
  • 2Laboratory of Neurorehabilitation Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
  • 3Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
  • 4Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligent Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
  • 5School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
  • 6Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
  • 7i-lab, Key Laboratory of Multifunctional Nanomaterials and Smart Systems, Suzhou Institute of Nano-Tech and Nano-Bionics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou, China
  • 8Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China
About Author:

Authors’ Contributions

All authors contributed to the final manuscript. N. Lan proposed, drafted, and edited the manuscript; M. Hao assisted editing the manuscript; M. Hao, C. M. Niu, H. Cui, Y. Wang, T. Zhang, and P. Fang each wrote a part in “Biorealistic Approach with Emerging Technologies”; and C. Chou prepared the figure.

Published: 2021-03-20 doi: 10.34133/2021/4675326
Outline
收藏切换

Integrating a prosthetic hand to amputees with seamless neural compatibility presents a grand challenge to neuroscientists and neural engineers for more than half century. Mimicking anatomical structure or appearance of human hand does not lead to improved neural connectivity to the sensorimotor system of amputees. The functions of modern prosthetic hands do not match the dexterity of human hand due primarily to lack of sensory awareness and compliant actuation. Lately, progress in restoring sensory feedback has marked a significant step forward in improving neural continuity of sensory information from prosthetic hands to amputees. However, little effort has been made to replicate the compliant property of biological muscle when actuating prosthetic hands. Furthermore, a full-fledged biorealistic approach to designing prosthetic hands has not been contemplated in neuroprosthetic research. In this perspective article, we advance a novel view that a prosthetic hand can be integrated harmoniously with amputees only if neural compatibility to the sensorimotor system is achieved. Our ongoing research supports that the next-generation prosthetic hand must incorporate biologically realistic actuation, sensing, and reflex functions in order to fully attain neural compatibility.

Ning Lan, Manzhao Hao, Chuanxin M. Niu, He Cui, Yu Wang, Ting Zhang, Peng Fang, Chih-hong Chou. Next-Generation Prosthetic Hand: from Biomimetic to Biorealistic[J]. Research, 2021 , 2021 (3) : 4675326 - . DOI: 10.34133/2021/4675326
Full Text
Less
1. Background
Less
Modern prosthetic hands mimic the anatomical structure and appearance of human hand but miss the biological underpinnings of actuation and sensing, thus lacking the similar functionality of human sensorimotor system. Many amputees choose to abandon prosthetic hands due to difficulties in control and absence of tactile awareness while grasping objects [1]. Sophisticated prosthetic hand often does not perform better than a simple gripper actuated by contralateral shoulder through a cable, which mediates an extended physiological proprioception (EPP) [2]. Rigid motor actuation does not lend prosthetic hand with compliance for grasping soft or fragile objects.
Humans have developed effective strategies for dexterous control of hand grasps without detailed motion planning at the actuator/effector levels. The biological mechanisms arise from compliant actuation of muscles and rich sensory afferents from proprioceptors and cutaneous receptors. These advantages of biological sensorimotor control allow an adaptive adjustment of hand stiffness at the fingers to that of the object grasped without precisely planning finger movements. Here, we advance a view that restoring biologically realistic compliant actuation and tactile sensory feedback in prosthetic hand may transform prosthetic grasp functions [3–7].
2. Human Sensorimotor Control
Less
Human sensorimotor control serves as a perfect model for prosthetic hands. The hierarchical metaphor of biological motor control as shown in Figure 1(a) may help to bridge the gap of understanding of motor control between human and robotics/prosthetics. The top level in the brain programs gross aspects of movements at the joint or endpoint of limbs. Movements are then translated into specific motor commands to muscles at the spinal level by muscle synergies [8]. Interneurons, particularly the propriospinal neurons (PN) [9, 10], in the spinal cord may form such a module of muscle synergies. At the bottom level, motor commands are executed by muscles acting at joints of limbs. The brain is well informed by proprioceptors and skin receptors that monitor the process and outcome of hand grasp. However, amputation disrupts both efferent and afferent sensorimotor signals. Achieving biological actuation, sensing, and control like human sensorimotor system entails restoring the disrupted peripheral sensorimotor processes.
Muscles possess highly nonlinear biomechanics with force dependent on fascicle length and velocity of contraction, which gives rise to the desirable compliance with stiffness and viscosity. Muscle viscoelasticity is further regulated by local reflex circuits at the α-motoneuron pools of the spinal cord [11]. It allows the brain to maintain equilibrium positions of limbs. A compliant limb is able to cope with unexpected disturbances during movement or posture, so that the brain does not need to compute explicitly forces and trajectories of the limb.
Muscles are embedded with proprioceptors, i.e., spindles and Golgi tendon organs (GTO), that are sensitive to muscle stretch and force [12]. The spindles are innervated by numerous γ-static and γ-dynamic motoneurons, which modulate spindle sensitivity. γ motoneurons are comodulated with α motoneurons to update peripheral muscles about kinematics of programmed movement by the brain [13].
Vision computes the locations of static or moving objects in space, which is used by the brain for planning and directing sensorimotor actions in reaching and grasp. Proprioceptive afferents inform the brain about muscle states and limb positions during execution of motor plans [12]. Tactile information from skin receptors allows the brain to discern physical attributes of grasped objects. It provides the brain with multimodalities of senses, such as touch, pressure, texture, temperature, and pain, so that human can manipulate soft or sharp objects effectively. Without tactile sensation, the hand must be placed under closed-loop control of visual supervision. Therefore, it is essential to restore neuromuscular reflex and tactile sensation in amputees, whose limb muscles are partially available and tactile sensation from hand is totally lost.
3. Biorealistic Approach with Emerging Technologies
Less
The major flaw in current prosthetic system compared with human limbs is that the efferent motor information from the brain and afferent sensory information to the brain are interrupted, and actuators of prosthetic limb are electric motors without the compliant flexibility of human neuromuscular system. A variety of implantable technologies have been developed to restore the functions of nervous system [3, 4, 7, 14, 15]. We are focusing on developing noninvasive and biorealistic technologies for the next-generation hand prosthesis. Figure 1(b) illustrates a potential biorealistic approach to developing the next-generation prosthetic hand. The goal is to improve the neural compatibility [16] by restoring the disrupted neuromuscular reflex and tactile sensation. These emerging technologies include the following:
(i)

Generative BMI models of motor signal decoding: a generative brain-machine interface (BMI) model can provide a feedforward control strategy for more biomimetic and flexible neuroprosthetic control for reaching and grasping [17, 18]. This technology is in evaluation in nonhuman primates.

(ii)

Recognition of motor intention using high-density EMG: novel pattern recognition methods can improve predicting motor intentions from high-density electromyogram (EMG) signals of residual muscles in amputated limb, which enables an intuitive control of prosthetic movements [19]. This technology has been applied to amputee control of prosthetic hand.

(iii)

Neuromorphic models of neuromuscular system: it is feasible to restore neuromuscular reflex process for cable-driven prosthetic hands with human-like traits, using neuromorphic hardware to perform fast computation of physiologically realistic models and to emulate human-like reflex in real time [6]. This technology is now in evaluation for human application.

(iv)

Noninvasive tactile sensory feedback: we have demonstrated the feasibility to utilize an electrically evoked tactile sensation (ETS) as a natural way to furnish sensory information to amputee’s brain. This sensory feedback technique is noninvasive, has long-term stability, and can supply finger-specific, multiple modalities of natural sensory information to amputees [5, 20]. This technology is currently undergoing evaluation of functional benefits in amputee subjects.

(v)

Selective slip sensors mimicking the Ruffini endings: a flexible tactile sensor inspired by the structure of fingerprints and the function of the Ruffini endings with selective sensitivity to static and sliding friction forces may enable prosthetic hand to handle slippage during grasping [21]. The proof of concept of this technology is completed. The device is in the initial stage for human application.

(vi)

Tendon-driven soft prosthetic hand: a tendon-driven soft prosthetic hand with finger body made of continuum spiral structure of super-elastic nitinol alloy material can have natural compliance for grasping objects using a simple control strategy [22]. This device is in refinement of structural design and functional evaluation.

4. Conclusion and Perspective
Less
Developing a prosthetic hand with biorealistic elements of human sensorimotor system may enhance its neural compatibility [16]. An incompatible prosthetic hand may result in reduced functionality or rejection. Past research has accumulated a large body of knowledge on human sensorimotor system [9, 23–26]. It is now technologically mature to translate this body of knowledge to design biorealistic prosthetic hands that restore neuromuscular mechanics [6], spinal reflexes [13], and tactile feedback [3–5, 7]. This may result in not only superior performance but also a new generation of prosthetic hands. Understanding neural compatibility between prosthetic hand and human sensorimotor system may broadly impact the design of prosthetic and therapeutic devices [16]. The biorealistic approach should also facilitate reverse engineering to understand neural mechanisms of brain control of movements in humans [27].
Funding
Less
  • Institute of Medical Robotics of Shanghai Jiao Tong University(IMR2018KY01)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China(81630050)
  • National Key R&D Program of China(2017YFA0701100)
References
Less
1
Biddiss E., and Chau T., “Upper-limb prosthetics,” American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, vol. 86, no. 12, pp. 977–987, 2007
2
Childress D. S., “Closed-loop control in prosthetic systems: historical perspective,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 8, no. 4-6, pp. 293–303, 1980
3
Tan D. W., Schiefer M. A., Keith M. W., Anderson J. R., Tyler J., and Tyler D. J., “A neural interface provides long-term stable natural touch perception,” Science Translational Medicine, vol. 6, no. 257, article 257ra138, 2014
4
D’Anna E., Valle G., Mazzoni A., Strauss I., Iberite F., Patton J., Petrini F. M., Raspopovic S., Granata G., Di Iorio R., Controzzi M., Cipriani C., Stieglitz T., Rossini P. M., and Micera S., “A closed-loop hand prosthesis with simultaneous intraneural tactile and position feedback,” Science Robotics, vol. 4, no. 27, article eaau8892, 2019
5
Hao M., Chou C. H., Zhang J., Yang F., Cao C., Yin P., Liang W., Niu C. M., and Lan N., “Restoring finger-specific sensory feedback for transradial amputees via non-invasive evoked tactile sensation,” IEEE Open Journal of Engineering in Medicine and Biology, vol. 1, pp. 98–107, 2020
6
Niu C. M., Luo Q., Chou C., Liu J., Hao M., and Lan N., “Neuromorphic model of reflex for realtime human-like compliant control of prosthetic hand,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 673–688, 2021
7
Bensmaia S. J., Tyler D. J., and Micera S., “Restoration of sensory information via bionic hands,” Nature Biomedical Engineering, pp. 1–13, 2020
8
Bizzi E., Cheung V. C. K., d’Avella A., Saltiel P., and Tresch M., “Combining modules for movement,” Brain Research Reviews, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 125–133, 2008
9
Alstermark B., and Isa T., “Circuits for skilled reaching and grasping,” Annual Review of Neuroscience, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 559–578, 2012
10
Hao M., He X., Xiao Q., Alstermark B., and Lan N., “Corticomuscular transmission of tremor signals by propriospinal neurons in Parkinson’s disease,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 11, article e79829, 2013
11
Hultborn H., “Spinal reflexes, mechanisms and concepts: from Eccles to Lundberg and beyond,” Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 78, no. 3-5, pp. 215–232, 2006
12
Prochazka A., “Proprioceptive feedback and movement regulation,” Handbook of Physiology, Exercise: Regulation and Integration of Multiple Systems, American Physiological Society, pp. 89–127, 1996, sect. 12, chapt 3.
13
Li S., Zhuang C., Hao M., He X., Marquez J. C., Niu C. M., and Lan N., “Coordinated alpha and gamma control of muscles and spindles in movement and posture,” Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, vol. 9, p. 122, 2015
14
Shan Y., Feng H., and Li Z., “Electrical stimulation for nervous system injury: research progress and prospects,” Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, vol. 36, no. 12, p. 2005038, 2020
15
Li Z., Zheng Q., Wang Z. L., and Li Z., “Nanogenerator-based self-powered sensors for wearable and implantable electronics,” Research, vol. 2020, article 8710686, –25, 2020
16
Lan N., Niu C. M., Hao M., Chou C., and Dai C., “Achieving neural compatibility with human sensorimotor control in prosthetic and therapeutic devices,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 122–134, 2019
17
Cui H., “Forward prediction in the posterior parietal cortex and dynamic brain-machine interface,” Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, vol. 10, 2016
18
Li C., Zhang Y., Wang T., Xu X., Wang Q., Xu B., and Cui H., “Generative decoding of intracortical neuronal signals for online control of robotic arm to intercept moving objects,” Journal of Physics Conference Series, vol. 1576, article 012057, 2020
19
Li X., Samuel O. W., Zhang X., Wang H., Fang P., and Li G., “A motion-classification strategy based on sEMG-EEG signal combination for upper-limb amputees,” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 2, 2017
20
Li Y., Chou C., Zhang J., Hao M., and Lan N., “A pilot study of multi-site simultaneous stimulation for tactile and opening information feedback in prosthetic hand,” in presented at the 2021 10th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER), May 2021, , Virtual. https://neuro.embs.org/2021/.
21
Li Y., Cao Z., Li T., Sun F., Bai Y., Lu Q., Wang S., Yang X., Hao M., Lan N., and Zhang T., “Highly selective biomimetic flexible tactile sensor for neuroprosthetics,” Research, vol. 2020, article 8910692, p. 1, 2020
22
Yan Y., Wang Y., Chen X., Shi C., Yu J., and Cheng C., “A tendon-driven prosthetic hand using continuum structure,” in 2020 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine Biology Society (EMBC), Montreal, QC, Canada, 2020, pp. 4951–4954
23
Jami L., “Golgi tendon organs in mammalian skeletal muscle: functional properties and central actions,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 623–666, 1992
24
Zajac F., “Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control,” Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 359–411, 1989
25
Macefield V. G., and Knellwolf T. P., “Functional properties of human muscle spindles,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 452–467, 2018
26
Johansson R. S., and Flanagan J. R., “Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks,” Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 345–359, 2009
27
Cheng G., Ehrlich S. K., Lebedev M., and Nicolelis M. A. L., “Neuroengineering challenges of fusing robotics and neuroscience,” Science Robotics, vol. 5, no. 49, 2020
Appendix
Less
Year 2021 volume 2021 Issue 3
PDF
68
37
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.34133/2021/4675326
  • Receive Date：2020-12-29
  • Online Date：2026-10-27
  • Published：2021-03-20
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received：2020-12-29
  • Accepted：2021-02-21
Funding
Institute of Medical Robotics of Shanghai Jiao Tong University(IMR2018KY01)
National Natural Science Foundation of China(81630050)
National Key R&D Program of China(2017YFA0701100)
Affiliations
    1Institute of Medical Robotics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
    2Laboratory of Neurorehabilitation Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
    3Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
    4Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligent Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    5School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
    6Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
    7i-lab, Key Laboratory of Multifunctional Nanomaterials and Smart Systems, Suzhou Institute of Nano-Tech and Nano-Bionics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou, China
    8Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/research/EN/10.34133/2021/4675326
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family		 属数
Number of
genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)		 属
Genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT
Links
Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read
Collections
Updates
Events
News
Multimedia
About
About Us
Contact
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
100081
010-62662699(Operation and Technical Support)
qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House