Previous research has demonstrated that, under the various electrocatalytic working conditions, the adsorbate might be adsorbed at the active center and the modified surface structures would significantly boost the activity of catalysts. For example, some fresh catalytic centers of SACs (e.g., MN
4-O and MN
4-OH) were detected by
in situ techniques, CHE model, and microkinetic analysis [
14,
49,
50]. It can be inferred that the
in situ generated oxygen adsorbate species may lead to reconstitutions of active sites of SA-Cu/NG and therefore enhance the ORR activity under working potential. Therefore, we systematically calculate preadsorption energies of O
, OH
, or OOH
intermediates on the catalytic center of SA-Cu/NG under different electrode potentials and generate the surface Pourbaix diagrams (Figure S22), from which the thermodynamically stable surface phases can be determined. As depicted in Figure S22, those active sites of SA-Cu/NG, where the Cu atoms are covered by a single O atom or a single OH at ORR working condition (at 0.7~1.23 V versus RHE) according to surface Pourbaix diagrams, are picked out for further studies on ORR theoretical activity. The adsorption free energies and reaction free energies of Cu-SACs with surface reconstitution (Figures S22c, S22e, S22g, and 22h) are shown in Tables S10~S13, and the reaction intermediates and reaction free energy along ORR are displayed in Figures S23 and S24. Among these Cu-SACs with surface reconstitution under working potential, as for Cu-N
2C
2-O (Figure
4(a)), unless the output potential increases to
, the free energy of the first proton-electron transfer step maintains downhill, and obviously, the first step of O
2 to form OOH
is the potential-determining step of ORR. Hence, the resultant
of Cu-N
2C
2-O is 0.84 V (Figure
4(b)) and higher than that for Pt(111) and Cu-N
2C
2. Despite the reconstituted active sites on other candidates, their ORR activities are still sluggish compared with Pt(111). There is another reaction mechanism for ORR, namely, dissociative pathway, where O
2 is adsorbed and then dissociated into two O
species on the Cu atom. However, the dissociation energy barrier of O
2 on SA-Cu/NG is larger than 1 eV (Figure S25), which is much higher than that of O
2 on Pt(111) (0.48 eV) [
51]. So, we believe that the associative mechanism is the most reasonable reduction pathway. To give an intuitive illustration, we further simulate their polarization curve and make a comparison with that of Pt(111) by means of microkinetic simulations (see Section
2.3 in Supplementary Materials for details). The predicted
of oxygen-reconstituted Cu-N
2C
2-O structure reaches ∼0.89 V versus RHE and outperforms Pt(111) by ∼50 mV (Figure
4(c)). Moreover, its
is larger than that of Pt(111). All theoretical outcomes show qualitatively reasonable consistency with experimental measurements, i.e., the oxygen-reconstituted structure (Cu-N
2C
2-O) rather than the virgin Cu-N
2C
2 configuration is the real active center of alkaline ORR under working potential.