Substantial efforts have been dedicated to optimization of the NRR selectivity by developing various heterogeneous electrocatalysts including metals, metal oxides, and nonmetallic materials, particularly focused on tailoring the particle size, crystallinity, morphology, defect density, and surface active sites [
15–
28]. For example, single-atom catalysts were demonstrated to have an atomic ensemble effect on suppressing the HER since it was perceived that only the top site of single-atom catalysts with positive relative energies contributed to H adsorption, with respect to the multiple adsorption sites (top, bridge, and hollow) for bulk metal surfaces [
29]. But to date, the highest FE achieved for these single-atom catalysts is limited to 56.6% as the HER remains to be a highly competitive reaction [
30]. Recently, the rates of NH
3 and H
2 production were deemed to be, respectively, zeroth order and first order in the electron and proton concentrations [
31]. Thus, it was suggested that reducing the proton and electron supply would slow down the HER kinetics and make N
2 more accessible to the surface active sites, thereby promoting the NRR conversion. In this respect, a number of strategies were implemented to expect an improvement on the selectivity toward NH
3 by using an aprotic solvent with extremely few proton donors [
32,
33], a hydrophobic protection layer to hinder proton transport [
33,
34], or an insulator-metal-catalyst electrode to slow down the electron tunneling [
16,
31]. Yet in spite of the small increase in selectivity, the NH
3 yield decreased significantly due to the proton-coupled electron transfer reaction mechanism [
35]. Conventionally, a gas reactant needs to dissolve in the electrolyte solution and electrochemical reactions take place in the solid-liquid two-phase interface [
36]. Thus, the electrocatalytic activity was limited by the inefficient gas mass transport seriously. Accordingly, another method for preferential production of NH
3 is to increase the concentration of N
2 in electrolyte solution in view of the fact that most organic solvents can dissolve N
2 by one or two orders of magnitude higher than water. An impressive FE of 60% was achieved by adopting an aprotic fluorinated ionic liquid which had higher N
2 solubility compared with water (17 vs. 0.66 mmol L
-1) [
37]. Nevertheless, the NH
3 production rate was limited to 10
-12 mol s
-1 cm
-2. A recent work achieved high NRR selectivity (90%) via a superhydrophobic MOF layer to repel water molecules and trap N
2, but at a cost of low activity [
34]. Hence, the accessibility of adequate N
2 molecules to the catalyst is critical but generally deficient, and it is difficult to obtain orders of magnitude improvement in selectivity while maintaining the activity by only manipulating the concentration of N
2 [
31], although a theoretical study has pointed out the preference for NH
3 formation if the catalyst surface is covered with N
2 rather than H adatoms [
10]. Previous reports have found that the selectivity and activity of CO
2 reduction are significantly affected by the CO
2 concentration at the catalyst surface and both can be improved by adjusting the reaction interface [
38,
39]. Besides, the solid-state electrochemical NRR cell with electrodes exposed to N
2 also demonstrates the promise to overcome the low conversion of the conventional catalytic reactors, but its performance is limited by the relative poor transport of protons and electronics [
40]. Therefore, we believe that effective electrochemical reduction of nitrogen to ammonia requires efficient contact of N
2 (gas), H
+ (liquid), and catalyst (solid).