Home Journals Articles Updates About
CN
image
收藏切换
Blood Mechanical Intelligence: From Force Sensing to Precision Mechanomedicine
收藏切换
PDF
Shichun Wang1, 2, Ting Pan1, 2, Qi Liu1, 2, Zedong Li3, 4, Ting Wen5, *, Bo Cheng3, 4, *, Feng Xu3, 4, *, Chunyan Yao1, 2, *
Research. Vol 9 Article ID 1157
Less
收藏切换
Research. Vol 9 Article ID 1157
• REVIEW ARTICLE •
Blood Mechanical Intelligence: From Force Sensing to Precision Mechanomedicine
Full
Shichun Wang1, 2, Ting Pan1, 2, Qi Liu1, 2, Zedong Li3, 4, Ting Wen5, *, Bo Cheng3, 4, *, Feng Xu3, 4, *, Chunyan Yao1, 2, *
Affiliations
  • 1Department of Blood Transfusion, The First Affiliated Hospital (Southwest Hospital) of Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, P.R. China.
  • 2PLA Chongqing Blood Center, Chongqing 400038, P.R. China.
  • 3MOE Key Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering, Bioinspired Engineering and Biomechanics Center, School of Life Science and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, P.R. China.
  • 4Bioinspired Engineering and Biomechanics Center (BEBC), School of Life Science and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, P.R. China.
  • 5Hainan General Hospital, Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570311, P.R. China.
About Author:

† The authors contributed equally to this work.

Published: 2026-02-20 doi: 10.34133/research.1157
Outline
收藏切换

Blood is a force-rich system. Beyond biochemistry, blood cells continually sense shear, stretch, and substrate rigidity, encode these inputs into biochemical and structural state changes, and adjust future behavior. We term this mechanical intelligence: an operational framework encompassing mechanosense, learning and memory, decision-making, and adaptive evolution. We synthesize evidence across red blood cells (RBCs), leukocytes, and platelets showing how mechanosensitive receptors (Piezo-type mechanosensitive ion channel component 1, glycoprotein Ib-IX-V complex, and integrins), cytoskeletal feedback, and nuclear effectors (Yes-associated protein/transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif and nuclear factor κB) couple mechanical cues to cellular states and functions (oxygen delivery, immune surveillance, and hemostasis). Repeated mechanical exposures produce mechanical memory (e.g., RBC fatigue and shape memory, shear-primed platelet hyperreactivity, and stiffness-modulated leukocyte transmigration) that improves performance in physiological contexts but contributes to pathology when dysregulated (vaso-occlusion, thrombosis, and inflammaging). We outline mechanodiagnostics (single-cell deformability cytometry, atomic force microscopy, and microfluidic thrombus profiling) and mechanotherapy (ion channel modulators, engineering cells, and mechanocompatible devices) and propose reporting standards, readiness levels, and validation pathways.

Shichun Wang, Ting Pan, Qi Liu, Zedong Li, Ting Wen, Bo Cheng, Feng Xu, Chunyan Yao. Blood Mechanical Intelligence: From Force Sensing to Precision Mechanomedicine[J]. Research, 2026 , 9 (2) : 1157 - . DOI: 10.34133/research.1157
Full Text
Less
Introduction
Less
Recent scientific breakthroughs reveal that cells can exhibit human intelligence, similar to behaviors through dynamic interactions with their microenvironment. These behaviors, including multimodal perception, problem-solving, mechanical memory, and evolutionary adaptation, are collectively termed “cellular intelligence” [1,2]. Subsequently, Cheng et al. [3,4] defined “cellular mechanical intelligence” as follows: Cells or cell clusters sense mechanical microenvironmental signals (shear stress, pressure, adhesive force, etc.), coordinated action of the mechanosensitive molecules, cytoskeleton, and signaling pathways, and achieve autonomous adaptive processes involving signal sensing, memory storage, decision-making, and functional optimization. Its core principle is “mechanically driven active intelligent behavior”. Blood consists of plasma and blood cells (red blood cells [RBCs], leukocytes, and platelets), playing a crucial role in transporting oxygen and nutrients, removing waste products and carbon dioxide, and maintaining homeostasis within the body. The mechanical properties of blood involve viscosity, shear stress, and the stiffness of the microenvironmental matrix. Blood cells continuously respond these mechanical factors within the hemodynamic environment, translating mechanical signals into intracellular biochemical signals that regulate cellular morphology and function [5]. On the basis of these findings, we propose that RBCs, leukocytes, and platelets collectively perform dynamic mechanosensory functions, fundamentally redefining the blood as an intelligent mechanical system.
This paradigm shift is rooted in insights from across hematology, immunology, physics, and bioengineering. A key breakthrough was the discovery of mechanosensitive ion channels (exemplified by Piezo-type mechanosensitive ion channel component 1 [PIEZO1]) that convert membrane tension into biochemical signals [6]. Such channels, first identified a decade ago in nonblood cells [4,7], were soon found in blood cell lineages as well [8]. For example, in RBCs, mechanical activation of PIEZO1 triggers Ca2+ influx that regulates cell volume and deformability, while mutations in the PIEZO1 gene cause a hereditary anemia characterized by dehydrated and rigid RBCs [9], directly implicating mechanotransduction in blood physiology. Mechanical intelligence in blood also extends to the immune system. Leukocytes monitor and respond to biophysical cues such as fluid shear stress in the bloodstream and matrix stiffness in tissues, as they circulate or migrate through the tissues [10]. They also require mechanical forces at the immunological synapse to fully activate, where the T cell receptor (TCR) behaves as a mechanosensor that enhances antigen discrimination under force [11]. This emerging mechanoimmunology underscores that immune cells integrate both chemical and physical information to make decisions [12]. Platelets, the effectors of clotting, provide another striking case of mechanical responsiveness. High shear stress, as found in injured arteries or stenotic vessels, directly activates platelets. As the platelet mechanosensor, glycoprotein Ib-IX-V complex (GPIb-IX-V) binds von Willebrand factor (vWF) under flow and transduces shear force into intracellular signals [13,14]. In essence, platelets use physical cues to decide when to disband or aggregate: They promote thrombosis when mechanical and biochemical triggers concur, but excessive shear triggers an inbuilt inhibitory feedback to prevent uncontrolled clotting [15].
These examples highlight how blood cells not only transduce forces in the moment but also exhibit mechanical memory and adaptation. The cytoskeleton of a cell can effectively “remember” past mechanical events by undergoing lasting structural changes [16]. Under repeated mechanical stretching by optical tweezers, RBC membrane–cytoskeletal complex undergoes irreversible structural rearrangement [17]. More generally, their response to a given mechanical force is influenced by their prior exposure to similar forces [16]. The vWF binding site and receptor sensitivity are continuously up-regulated by repeated mechanical stimulation, causing the GPIb-IX-V complex of platelets to remain in an activated state [18]. Collectively, these mechanoresponsive behaviors of blood cells—mechanical sensing, learning and memory, decision-making and adaptive evolution—represent what we term “mechanical intelligence”. This blood mechanical intelligence is the integrated capacity of blood cells to sense mechanical forces by mechanosensors and process these signals via encoders to achieve mechanotransduction, thereby enabling learning and memory processes and autonomous response to decide and adapt their behavior accordingly.
Viewing blood through the prism of mechanical intelligence has broad implications (Fig. 1). It suggests that blood diseases from sickle cell anemia to atherosclerosis involve failures or alterations in cellular mechanosensing. It also inspires new cross-disciplinary innovations—so-called mechanodiagnostics and mechanotherapies. Measuring the deformability or mechanosignaling of blood cells is emerging as a diagnostic strategy (e.g., microfluidic devices that detect stiff malaria-infected RBCs or hyperreactive platelets [19]. Therapeutically, drugs targeting mechanotransducers such as PIEZO1, or biomaterials that modulate extracellular stiffness, represent novel ways to influence blood cell behavior in disease. In the following sections, we describe the evidence for mechanical sensing, learning and memory, decision-making, and adaptive evolution in blood cells, discuss how these intelligent mechanical behaviors emerge at cellular level, and consider diagnostic applications of blood mechanics and therapeutic opportunities that harness or modulate the mechanical intelligence of blood (see Results and Discussion). By integrating perspectives from medicine and physics, we aim to illuminate a future in which the “smart” properties of blood are leveraged for cutting-edge clinical interventions (see Conclusion). An overview of this review is presented in Boxes 1 to 3.
Box 1. What do we mean by “mechanical intelligence”?
•

Scope: Not cognition; an engineering-style control loop in cells: (a) sensors for mechanical sensing (PIEZO1, integrins, GPIb/IX/V, and selectins), (b) encoders (Ca2+ pulses, Rho GTPase signaling pathway, and SFK signaling pathways), (c) learning and memory (shape recovery, antigen recognition, and repairing vascular), (d) decision (adhere versus roll, spread versus rest, and contract versus stabilize), and (e) adaptation evolution (cytoskeletal connectivity and chromatin marks).

•

Testable predictions: Prior mechanical exposures shift thresholds (e.g., activation, adhesion, and transmigration) in quantifiable ways.

•

Falsifiability: If prior exposures do not measurably change thresholds or policies under controlled force histories, the “memory” claim is rejected.

Box 2.Method primer and reporting checklist (mechanodiagnostics)
•

Shear profile characteristics, including steady, pulsatile, and oscillatory patterns, along with peak and root mean square values; exposure duration and duty cycle.

•

Cell source information, including donor age, sex, and comorbidities.

•

Device calibration parameters, such as cantilever spring constants, microchannel dimensions, and flow wverification procedures.

•

Measured end points, including deformability indices, stiffness, adhesion lifetime, contractile force, and calcium ion (Ca2+) dynamics.

•

Interventions involving pharmacologic inhibitors (e.g., PIEZO1 and ROCK blockers), as well as cell-scale and device-scale engineering modifications.

Box 3. Translational readiness levels (TRL-style rubric)
•

TRL 2 and 3: Ex vivo mechanophenotyping correlates with disease (e.g., RBC deformability in sickle cell disease and shear-primed platelet assays).

•

TRL 4 and 5: Prospective observational studies demonstrate prognostic value (e.g., microfluidic thrombus profiling in hypertension/aging).

•

TRL 6 and 7: Interventional studies showing mechanotarget modulation changes clinical end points (e.g., integrin/GPVI axis and PIEZO1 modulators).

•

TRL 8 and 9: Device/drug integrated into clinical workflow with demonstrated non-inferiority to standard care plus unique benefit on mechanical end points.

Results and Discussion
Less
Mechanical intelligence of blood cells
Circulating blood cells display “mechanical intelligence”, i.e., the ability to perceive mechanical forces, encode experience as short- and long-term memory, integrate these cues with biochemical signals, and execute context-appropriate decisions that adapt over time. These mechanical intelligence capabilities allow RBCs, leukocytes, and platelets to independently optimize oxygen transport, immune surveillance, and hemostasis across rapidly fluctuating shear, pressure, and matrix conditions. Meanwhile, they also respond synergistically to mechanical stimuli during certain physiological and pathological processes such as the formation of neutrophil extracellular networks and thrombosis, forming an integrated mechanical regulatory network in the circulatory system. Below, we synthesize the core behaviors, including mechanosensing, mechanical learning and memory, decision-making, and adaptive evolution, for each lineage, emphasizing quantitative thresholds where available, and further elaborate on the collective mechanical behaviors arising from intercellular cooperation in the bloodstream (Fig. 2).
Red blood cells
The ability of blood cells to sense mechanical forces in their microenvironment, including shear stress, stiffness, viscosity, and traction force, is termed blood mechanosensing. RBCs possess a sophisticated form of mechanosensing intelligence, allowing them to detect and transduce mechanical forces into biochemical activity. PIEZO1 is a crucial mechanical sensor on RBCs that converts mechanical stimuli into biological signals. It not only regulates other proteins synthesis but also controls iron metabolism, linking to erythropoiesis. Its mutations can also delay reticulocyte maturation, affecting glycolytic metabolism and oxygen affinity. Membrane stretch or shear activates PIEZO1, thereby modulating ion flux to enable RBCs to continuously adjust membrane viscosity and elasticity, which minimizes energy dissipation across shear regimes and contributes to dehydration control [20].
Habituation is a form of cellular learning [21]. Both in vivo circulation and in vitro optical-tweezers-induced stretching experiments demonstrate that repeated deformation induces mechanical habituation in RBCs, indicating that RBCs possess mechanical learning and memory capabilities. This process involves hemoglobin–actin network remodeling (mechanical protection), leading to progressive reduction in deformability, increased stiffness, and accelerated accumulation of membrane damage alongside cytoskeletal remodeling. This adaptive strategy delays fatigue [17,21,22]. “Mechanical memory” is claimed to retain cellular information from past mechanical microenvironments and influence subsequent cell fate [23]. RBCs “remember” their biconcave geometry. When exposed to shear flow that induces tank treading (TT) or elongation and subsequently returned to static condition, RBC membranes tend to drift back to their original configuration. In go–stop shear experiments, membrane-attached fiducial markers returned to their initial positions even after hours of TT, and RBCs recovered their discoid shape at both room temperature and 37 °C, indicating the evidence of a persistent internal stress topology within the membrane skeleton [24]. Such shape memory ensures that RBCs can repeatedly squeeze through tiny capillaries and recover their optimal discoid shape for efficient gas exchange. To sum up, blood cells can “remember” past mechanical stimuli through “learning” to remodel encoders following repeated mechanical sensing—a phenomenon that we term blood mechanical learning and memory.
The ability of blood cells to make cellular fate decisions based on mechanical sensing and mechanotransduction is termed blood mechanical decision-making. RBCs execute a form of mechanical decision-making by switching between distinct dynamic modes in response to hydrodynamic conditions. Below a shear threshold dependent on cytoskeletal elasticity and cytoplasmic viscosity, RBCs tumble; beyond it, they transition to TT [24]. TT aligns cells with flow and reduces asymmetric stress at high shear, whereas tumbling prevents prolonged deformation at low shear, representing an energy-saving, mechanical decision-making choice [25]. Mechanical heterogeneity decides how RBCs respond to hydrodynamic forces. Soft healthy RBCs navigate high shear arterioles via TT, whereas stiff pathological RBCs marginate toward vessel walls, predisposing to microvascular occlusions, as confirmed by simulations and in vivo observations (e.g., in sickle cell disease) [26].
Leukocytes
Leukocytes, which can be classified into 5 major categories (neutrophils, eosinophils, basophils, lymphocytes, and monocytes), play essential roles in immune defense. They can integrate shear forces and substrate stiffness via selectins, integrins, and cytoskeletal architecture to navigate the vasculature. Rolling and adhesion are optimal at ~0.1 to 5.0 dynˑcm-2 of shear stress, mediated by selectin catch bonds that lengthen bond lifetime under modest tension. However, beyond 10 dynˑcm−2, adhesion probability declines by 90%, as bonds transition to slip behavior, and cells undergo morphological changes to a teardrop shape before detachment [27,28].
Leukocytes can “remember” prior mechanical exposures, which can alter their responsiveness upon subsequent challenges. Brief subthreshold shear primes neutrophils for enhanced neutrophil extracellular traposis upon a second hit, consistent with a short-term mechanical memory that lowers activation thresholds [29]. Other clear examples are the behavior of lymphocytes during antigen recognition. Liu et al. [30] investigated the effects of mechanical forces on TCR–peptide major histocompatibility complex (TCR–pMHC) interactions. T cell contact with antigen-presenting cells (APCs) induces cytoskeletal contraction, generating physiological forces of 5 to 10 pN. These forces regulate TCR–pMHC binding patterns and determine whether TCR undergoes conformational changes to expose immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM) for T cell activation. Similarly, following antigen binding, the traction force on B cells increases rapidly, reaching a peak within 10 to 15 min. This is followed by a plateau phase (lasting 20 to 30 min) and then gradually decreases as antigen internalization is completed. Under high-affinity antigen stimulation, the peak traction force (35 to 40 pN) is significantly higher than that induced by low-affinity antigens (15 to 20 pN). When traction falls below 25 pN, antigen–B cell receptor (BCR) binding is easily disrupted, preventing effective activation. Memory B cells exhibit a slightly lower peak traction force (25 to 30 pN) than naïve B cells (30 to 40 pN) but reach peak force more rapidly (5 to 8 min), consistent with the “rapid response” functional characteristic of memory B cells [31]. These memories are plausibly stored in cytoskeletal architecture and mechanosignaling states that persist after stimulus removal.
Leukocytes weigh mechanical and chemical cues to choose between adhesion versus deadhesion, circulation versus extravasation, phagocytosis versus neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) release, and proinflammatory versus anti-inflammatory programs. During diapedesis, increasing shear initially stabilizes rolling through catch bonds; once integrins engage, shear promotes cell spreading and migration through endothelial junctions. However, excessively high shear stress defers transmigration to regions of lower stress, such as postcapillary venules [28,32]. Matrix mechanics polarize macrophages: Stiff (~100 kPa) substrates bias toward M1 via PIEZO1–Yes-associated protein (YAP) signaling, whereas soft (~1 to 5 kPa) matrices favor M2 phenotypes [33]. Moreover, endothelial PIEZO1 is required cell-extrinsically for efficient leukocyte diapedesis [34].
Aging imposes a robust biomechanical signature on immune cells. CD4+/CD8+ T cell elastic modulus increases from ~0.5 to 1.0 kPa to ~2.0 to 4.0 kPa, linked to nuclear lamina disorganization (e.g., Lamin B1 loss), reduced deformability, and impaired interstitial migration and capillary transmigration [35,36]. In addition, age-associated dysregulation of integrin and actin dynamics further degrades diapedesis efficiency in neutrophils and monocytes [37]. Thus, immunosenescence is characterized by a mechanophenotypic drift that impairs immune surveillance: As leukocytes accumulate mechanical and oxidative damage over a lifetime, they undergo adaptive changes, such as increased stiffness and reduced motility, which further contribute to the deterioration of immune function. In all, blood cells can adapt their behaviors based on the past mechanical responses by remodeling cytoskeletal connectivity or gene programs—a phenomenon that we term blood mechanical adaptive evolution.
Platelets
Mechanical cues regulate platelet output by mechanosensing. In megakaryocytes (MKs), arterial-like shear stress acutely accelerates proplatelet formation, with 30 to 45% of MKs releasing platelets within ~20 min under flow, and turbulence boosts ex vivo biogenesis to clinical scale [38]. PIEZO1 acts as a negative mechanical regulator of MK maturation; its activation suppresses polyploidization and platelet yield, whereas deletion increases platelet counts, establishing a feedback control on circulating numbers [39]. Matrix stiffness also tunes thrombopoiesis: Stiff substrates restrain proplatelet formation via αIIbβ3-dependent spreading/contractility, while transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 activation on soft matrices promotes calcium (Ca2+) signaling and platelet production [40].
Once in the bloodstream, platelets are constantly monitoring the mechanical environment for signs of vessel injury. At a wound site, when subendothelial collagen and vWF are exposed, platelets rapidly sense the abrupt change in mechanical conditions: from a smooth endothelial surface to a rough, adhesive, and sometimes highly strained matrix [15]. High shear stress unfolds vWF’s A1 domain (≥500 to 1,000 s−1) to engage platelet’s GPIbα, initiating tethering and a GPIb-driven Ca2+ spike that activates αIIbβ3; parallel GPVI–collagen binding senses the rigid collagen matrix to consolidate activation [41–43]. These mechanical signals are converted into biochemical signals within platelets, activating them to participate in hemostasis. Furthermore, GPVI deficiency (e.g., patients with Ehlers–Danlos syndrome) underscores this mechanosensing requirement, manifesting as bleeding due to impaired collagen responses [44].
Platelets also exhibit mechanical learning and memory. Traditional views hold that platelets primarily undergo passive adhesion and aggregation at sites of vascular injury to form thrombi for hemostasis. Nicolai et al. [45] observed that platelets actively monitor blood vessels through chemotaxis (migration along a gradient of matrix molecules), rapidly aggregating along collagen gradients exposed at sites of inflammation/infection, ultimately repairing the vascular barrier, limiting inflammatory spread, and enhancing infection defense—independently of the classical coagulation pathway. In addition, brief exposure to high shear stress (e.g., ~60 dynˑcm−2 for ~40 s) primes platelets to respond to subsequent low shear stress (~1 dynˑcm−2) with markedly enhanced aggregation (~20-fold) compared to naïve platelets that never suffer the high shear. This priming requires Ca2+ signaling generated via PIEZO1 and other mechanosensor and can be attenuated pharmacologically [18,46]. This mechanical learning and memory is beneficial: After platelets pass through high shear stenoses, they will more readily form a hemostatic plug downstream if needed. Conversely, sustained extreme shear stress (e.g., in patients on cardiopulmonary bypass or with mechanical heart valves) causes platelet depletion, degranulation, and functional exhaustion, producing a paradoxical thrombosis/bleeding phenotype clinically [47].
Platelets sense mechanical force (e.g., shear stress and substrate stiffness) to decide whether to fully spread, contract, and aggregate. Under normal physiological shear stress conditions, platelets appear as smooth, disc-shaped structures. When exposed to high shear stress environments, such as narrowed blood vessels, platelets rapidly respond by first extending filamentous pseudopodia. This increases their contact surface area with the vessel wall or other platelets, facilitating adhesion and aggregation. As shear stress persists, platelets undergo further deformation, producing more pseudopodia that interconnect to form a network structure, thereby promoting the formation of platelet aggregation [48]. In addition, on rigid fibrin (such as a calcified plaque or a taut fibrin mesh), they display greater αIIbβ3 activation, α-granule secretion, and rapid conversion to a procoagulant state through Rho-associated protein kinase (ROCK)–myosin light chain pathway-driven traction [49]. Moreover, filamin A (FLIN A) links αIIbβ3 to the cytoskeleton, forming a mechanical positive feedback required for force generation and clot retraction [50]. Therefore, platelet involvement in stabilizing hemostatic thrombi constitutes a force-threshold-regulated decision-making mechanism.
Platelets also use mechanical cues to adapt evolution in immunity and aging processes [51,52]. Under high shear, platelets aggregate with circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and leukocytes via αIIbβ3 or P-selectin, shielding CTCs and modulating inflammation [53–55]. In sepsis or arterial injury, platelet–neutrophil interactions enhanced by shear stress stimulation promote excessive NET formation, which intertwines with fibrin to cause microvascular occlusion [50]. In addition, local collagen stiffening can promote platelet-derived microparticles, amplifying inflammatory signaling [56]. During aging, loss of GPIbα sialic acid marks platelets for Ashwell–Morell receptor-mediated clearance and triggers compensatory thrombopoietin production, thereby embedding life cycle of platelet within a mechanoendocrine feedback loop [57–60].
Collective mechanical intelligence in the bloodstream
These mechanical behaviors often occur in cooperation among different cells, rather than in isolation within a single cell. Under in vitro flow conditions, RBCs can enhance platelet aggregation on collagen surfaces. In mouse models, transfused RBCs also improved hemostasis with severe pancytopenia by enhancing fibrin formation. Similarly, increasing RBC membrane stiffness interferes with shear-induced platelet aggregation, while adenosine diphosphate (ADP) released by RBCs under high shear stress promotes platelet activation. Accordingly, altering the deformability of RBC membranes affects their capacity to support platelet function [61]. NETs are reticular structures released by activated neutrophils, containing components such as DNA, histones, and antimicrobial proteins. NETs are widely present in inflammation, infection, and vascular diseases. They can directly damage vascular endothelial cells, promote thrombosis, and trigger vascular inflammatory responses, making them one of the key pathological mechanisms underlying vascular complications such as atherosclerosis, thromboembolism, and ischemic stroke. Platelets can activate neutrophils by releasing bioactive substances (such as ADP and thromboxane A2 [TXA2]), thereby inducing NET release. Concurrently, direct platelet–neutrophil interactions also enhance NET production. Phosphatidylserine (PS) exposed on the NET surface provides a platform for platelet activation, promoting platelet aggregation and clotting factor assembly. This accelerates thrombin generation and fibrin deposition, ultimately forming a thrombus [29,62]. Pathological force fields can invert these synergies: Turbulent shear fragments RBCs and hyperactivates platelets (hemolysis–thrombosis), while rigid sickled RBCs marginate, interact aberrantly with endothelium and platelets, and initiate microthrombi [26]. Understanding these multicell, force-coupled loops clarifies how the vasculature maintains homeostasis and how their dysregulation drives inflammation and thrombosis.
The mechanism of mechanical intelligence formation of blood cells
Blood cells sense force stimuli through sensors such as PIEZO1, integrins, GPIb/IX/V, and selectins and transduce mechanical signals by encoders (Ca2+ pulses, Rho guanosine triphosphatase [Rho GTPase] signaling pathway, and Src family kinase [SFK] signaling pathways). During these processes, mechanical intelligence emerges from 3 nested layers of information processing: membrane mechanoreception, cytoskeletal force transduction, and nuclear mechanotransduction (in nucleated cells). These layers encode short-term memory (ion fluxes and posttranslational signaling), intermediate structural memory (cytoskeletal remodeling), and long-term memory (epigenetic/gene expression changes), thereby enabling blood cells to make decisions, and undergo adaptive evolution (Table 1).
Sensors for mechanical sensing
Mechanical cues in the vascular microenvironment critically regulate blood cell functions, and RBCs, leukocytes (neutrophils and lymphocytes) and platelets use distinct yet conserved mechanosensors—including ion channels, integrins, and cytoskeleton-associated proteins—to perceive and to convert force into biochemical signals.
Ion-channel-type mechanosensors
Ion-channel-type mechanosensors are important for blood cells to sense mechanical signals. Among them, PIEZO1 is the most well studied and core member, while ligand-gated P2X receptors (P2X1) also participate in the mechanical signal transduction process of platelets.
In RBCs, PIEZO1 serves as the core mechanosensitive receptor and a key mediator for sensing cyclic shear stress. When RBCs pass through narrowed capillaries or are in a high shear stress environment, the increase in membrane tension triggers conformational changes in PIEZO1, mediating Ca2+ influx to regulate cell functional states and help cells adapt to the environment [63]. In leukocytes, PIEZO1 is the most clearly studied ion-channel-type mechanosensitive receptor. High-intensity membrane tension endured by neutrophils during transendothelial migration directly activates PIEZO1 channels, mediating Ca2+ influx, which ultimately potentiates reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and enhances bacterial killing capacity [64]. Meanwhile, PIEZO1 can transduce hemodynamic shear stress into Ca2+ signals, driving neutrophils to differentiate into a proangiogenic phenotype and regulating pulmonary vascular homeostasis and regeneration [65]. PIEZO1 of platelets also senses hemodynamic shear stress and extensional strain. Under high shear conditions (e.g., at arterial stenosis where the shear rate reaches 12,000 s−1), its activation can mediate Ca2+ influx [66]. Under supraphysiological hemodynamic gradients, PIEZO1 acts as an extensional strain sensor, forming a “mechanosome” complex with P2X1 channels to convert mechanical strain signals into Ca2+ transients, activating platelets, and putting them in a “sensitized” state under extreme flow conditions [66].
G-protein-coupled receptor-type mechanosensors
G-protein-coupled receptors are another important class of mechanosensors that indirectly respond to fluid shear stress by regulating their constitutive activity, playing a unique role in the microcirculation adaptation of neutrophils. Among them, the formyl peptide receptor (FPR) is a typical representative of this class of receptors. When neutrophils are exposed to intravascular shear stress (0.5 to 5 dynˑcm−2), the constitutive activity of FPR decreases, which, in turn, inhibits Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 guanosine triphosphatase function, induces pseudopod retraction, and reduces microcirculatory retention. In contrast, undifferentiated HL60 cells (neutrophil precursors) lack FPR expression, resulting in minimal pseudopod formation and no response to fluid shear stress [67].
Adhesion receptor family mechanosensors
Various molecules in the adhesion receptor family can act as mechanosensors, which transduce tensile signals at the adhesion interface through dynamic interactions with the extracellular matrix, regulating the adhesion, migration, and other functions of blood cells. They mainly include the integrin family (αmβ2/CD11b and αIIbβ3) and GPIb-IX-V complex.
In leukocytes, integrin αmβ2/CD11b is an important mechanosensitive receptor of the adhesion receptor family. The β2 integrin/intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1)–ROCK–myosin II axis mediated by it can convert matrix stiffness into RhoA-dependent contractile force, directly promoting the transendothelial migration of leukocytes [68]. In platelets, the GPIb-IX-V complex is the core mechanosensitive receptor responding to high shear stress, which mainly senses and transduces mechanical signals through its interaction with vWF [69]. Specifically, high shear force can unfold the vWF A1 domain, promoting its binding to GPIbα. Then, the tensile force on GPIbα causes it to expose the juxtamembrane mechanosensory domain (MSD), triggering a strong Ca2+ spike, driving αIIbβ3 activation, and ultimately achieving firm adhesion and aggregation of platelets under flow conditions [70,71]. Integrin αIIbβ3, as the main mechanosensitive adhesion receptor in platelets, senses mechanical forces generated by cell–cell and cell–matrix interactions through bidirectional signaling to regulate platelet aggregation [72].
Antigen-specific immune-receptor-type mechanosensors
BCR and TCR, as antigen-specific immune receptors, have intrinsic mechanosensitive properties [73]. During interaction with APCs, BCR and TCR can sense interfacial mechanical forces to regulate the intensity of signal activation. This mechanical regulation converts mechanical signals into biochemical signals through cytoskeleton-derived forces, thereby regulating the activation and proliferation of lymphocytes [73].
Encoders for mechanotransduction
Ca2+-dependent signaling pathway
The Ca2+-dependent signaling pathway is a core pathway for blood cells to transduce mechanical signals, with PIEZO1 channels often serving as the upstream mechanical sensor to initiate Ca2+ influx, which further regulates downstream effector molecules and functional responses.
RBCs can form “mechanical learning and memory” through Ca2+-dependent signaling pathway. Calcium ions mediate the volume homeostasis of human erythrocytes in circulation. Deformation of erythrocytes traversing capillaries transiently activates mechanosensitive PIEZO1 channels, allowing Ca2+ influx against its steep inward gradient. This temporarily overrides the calcium pump and elevates [Ca2+]i [63]. This Ca2+ signal also activate downstream effectors including the Gardos channel (KCa3.1) and scramblase: KCa3.1-mediated K+ efflux induces water loss to reduce RBC volume and enhance deformability, facilitating passage through microvasculature, while scramblase activation promotes PS exposure on the cell membrane [74]. In addition, PIEZO1-dependent Ca2+ influx regulates mechanotransductive adenosine triphosphate release from RBCs, which modulates vascular tone and endothelial function—an effect blunted by PIEZO1 inhibitors such as grammostola spatulata mechanotoxin 4 (GsMTx4) or ruthenium red [75].
In leukocytes, Ca2+-dependent signaling is crucial for immune function execution. During transendothelial migration or tissue infiltration, neutrophils sense shear stress or compressive forces via PIEZO1; sustained compressive forces during capillary traversal activate membrane-localized PIEZO1, mediating transient Ca2+ influx that drives up-regulation of proangiogenic genes (e.g., vascular endothelial growth factor A) and inflammation-related genes [65]. Meanwhile, PIEZO1 activation by high-intensity membrane tension during neutrophil transendothelial migration mediates Ca2+ influx, potentiating ROS generation and enhancing bacterial killing capacity [64]. For macrophages, PIEZO1-mediated Ca2+ signaling couples to calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II–hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (CaMKII–HIF-1α) to promote glycolysis and modulates M1/M2 polarization via actin feedback [76]. In addition, B cells sense mechanical traction through BCR-membrane antigen binding, triggering a Ca2+ effector-involved signaling cascade that induces BCR microclustering, antigen extraction, and full B cell activation [31]; TCR binding to pMHC activates Ca2+-related mechanotransduction, amplifying TCR signaling and inducing T cell activation [11].
In platelets, Ca2+ signaling participates in the “sliding–locking” positive feedback during mechanotransduction. Under high shear conditions, PIEZO1 activation mediates Ca2+ influx [66]; subsequently, Ca2+-dependent myosin II contraction forms stress fibers, while talin/kindlin 3 stretching reinforces αIIbβ3 activation [72]. Moreover, tensile force on GPIbα exposes the juxtamembrane MSD, triggering a strong Ca2+ spike that drives αIIbβ3 activation and firm platelet adhesion and aggregation [70,71].
Rho GTPase signaling pathway
The Rho GTPase signaling pathway mainly mediates cytoskeletal remodeling, cell adhesion, and migration in blood cells by transducing mechanical signals from adhesion receptors or membrane mechanosensors.
In leukocytes, this pathway is critical for neutrophil recruitment and migration. Integrins such as β2 perceive adhesive tension at the leukocyte–endothelium interface, activating Rho GTPase pathways to reinforce cytoskeletal remodeling and stable adhesion—key processes for neutrophil recruitment to inflammation sites [68]. During neutrophil diapedesis, Rho-GTPase-driven actin polymerization generates lamellipodia and invasive protrusions; inhibition of nonmuscle myosin II (a principal tension motor) reduces migration efficiency by >70%, highlighting the centrality of actomyosin contractility mediated by this pathway. In addition, the β2 integrin/ICAM-1–ROCK–myosin II axis in leukocytes (a branch of Rho GTPase signaling) converts matrix stiffness into RhoA-dependent contractile force, directly promoting transendothelial migration [68].
In platelets, Rho-GTPase-related molecules participate in actin remodeling during mechanotransduction. Triggered by integrin αIIbβ3-mediated outside-in signaling, platelets activate the Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1/cell division control protein 42 homolog/Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome protein/WASp-family verprolin-homologous protein (Rac1/Cdc42–WASp/WAVE) axis (members of the Rho GTPase family) to drive the actin-related protein 2/3 (Arp2/3) complex in assembling branched actin networks at the periphery, promoting lamellipodia formation and haptotactic migration along substrate-bound gradients [77].
SFK signaling pathways
SFK-related signaling pathways play important roles in platelet activation, leukocyte immune synapse formation, and other mechanical signal transduction processes, often converging with other pathways to enhance functional responses.
In platelets, high shear stress induces combined GPIbα and GPVI signaling, which engages SFK and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase protein kinase B (PI3K–Akt) pathways. These pathways converge with soluble agonists to fully activate αIIbβ3 and drive irreversible aggregation; subthreshold shear biases toward noncommitment, limiting inappropriate thrombosis [43,78]. In addition, high shear stress on the platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1/vascular endothelial cadherin/vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 complex leads to immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif (ITIM) phosphorylation and ITIM signaling, regulating platelet alignment, nitric oxide production, and inflammatory gene expression [79]. The spleen tyrosine kinase–PI3K–WAVE2–Arp2/3 cascade (linked to SFK signaling) mediates rapid branched F-actin assembly in platelets within seconds of mechanical stimulation [77].
In leukocytes, SFK signaling is involved in T and B cell activation. TCR binding to pMHC triggers activation of Src family kinases (e.g., Lck and Fyn), which phosphorylate TCR–CD3 ITAMs, recruit adaptor proteins (zeta-chain associated protein 70 kDa and linker for activation of T cells), and drive cytoskeletal remodeling via actin regulators (WASp and Arp2/3), amplifying TCR signaling [11]. Similarly, B cells sense mechanical traction through BCR–membrane antigen binding, initiating a signaling cascade of Src family kinases and cytoskeletal remodelers that induces BCR microclustering and full activation [73]. For macrophages, PIEZO1 can act as a Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) co-receptor, enhancing phagocytosis via SFK-related signaling [76].
Epigenetic and metabolic reprogramming
In anucleate RBCs, mechanical memory is encoded exclusively in material properties: Repeated optical-tweezers-induced stretching progressively stiffens the spectrin network (mechanoprotection), diminishes shape recovery (mechanical fatigue), and primes RBCs for splenic sequestration and elimination [22,80]. Evolution-refined spectrin–ankyrin cross-linking balances elasticity with resilience, enabling repeated passage through 2- to 3-μm slits and rapid shape recovery [80], while environmental shear stress promotes traits enhancing deformability in high shear arterial beds and antiaggregation in low shear environment [61].
In leukocytes, force history reprograms transcription via epigenetic modifications. Monocytes repeatedly traversing basement membranes acquire histone H3 lysine 27 acetylation activation marks on latent enhancers of migration-related genes (e.g., matrix metallopeptidase 9 and integrin subunit β2), enhancing gene expression and increasing migration efficiency by 3.5-fold (third versus first crossing); inhibiting these enhancers or blocking histone deacetylation erases this migration memory [34,81]. For macrophages, PIEZO1-mediated CaMKII–HIF-1α signaling promotes glycolysis (metabolic reprogramming), regulating M1/M2 polarization and linking mechanical cues to tissue repair [33,82].
Mechanodiagnostics and mechanotherapy: Harnessing blood cell mechanical intelligence
Blood cells exhibit intrinsic “mechanical intelligence”—the ability to convert mechanical forces into signals and behaviors, such as mechanosensing, learning and memory, and decision-making, which underpins novel diagnostic biomarkers and druggable nodes. We frame translation as measure, mechanophenotype, and modulate: (a) measure mechanical environments, single-cell mechanics, and mechanosensing and mechanotransduction of molecular level with calibrated platforms; (b) mechanophenotype mechanical environments, single-cell mechanical properties, and mechanosensing and mechanotransduction processes in relation to clinical states; (c) modulate aberrant mechanosensing and mechanotransduction with targeted molecular-scale therapies and cell-scale or device-scale engineering (Fig. 3).
Measuring mechanical properties for mechanodiagnostics
The technologies to measure mechanical properties of blood cells for early disease screening, diagnosis, condition monitoring, and prognosis assessment, we call it mechanodiagnostics. Accurate quantification is the foundational step, relying on a suite of biophysical tools. Techniques such as atomic force microscopy (AFM), micropipette aspiration, and optical tweezers provide high-resolution, single-cell data on stiffness, cortical tension, and deformability under static or quasi-static conditions [83,84]. These methods are essential for establishing baseline mechanical constants. Concurrently, dynamic, population-level measurements are crucial. Microfluidic platforms subject cells to well-defined fluid shear stresses and capillary-scale constrictions, generating high-throughput data on deformation kinetics and recovery times that closely mimic in vivo hemodynamics [85–87]. In particular, the emergence of some faithful models that can accurately distinguish pathological blood cells has brought significant advantages to mechanodiagnostics in the treatment of blood diseases [88].
The evolution of these tools is marked by increasing throughput and biological integration. Early single-cell methods were precise but low-throughput. The development of high-throughput deformability cytometry, including real-time deformability cytometry, represented a significant leap [19]. Recent integration of such mechanical screening with omics technologies, such as single-cell RNA sequencing, allows for direct correlation of mechanical states with molecular profiles, enabling the discovery of genetic regulators that set a cell’s mechanical “set point” [19]. This convergence is essential for moving beyond descriptive phenomenology toward mechanistic discovery.
Mechanophenotyping mechanical profiles of disease states
The mechanical characteristics of different cell states are what we term a mechanophenotype. The critical next step is mechanophenotyping—the systematic association of mechanical signatures with specific clinical states to identify “mechanobiomarkers” and reveal “mechanopathologies”. For example, the pronounced loss of deformability in plasmodium-infected or sickle erythrocytes is a direct driver of microvascular occlusion, serving as a quantifiable metric of disease severity [85]. In leukocytes, lymphocyte stiffening is documented in severe COVID-19, while altered monocyte mechanics correlate with inflammatory and neoplastic conditions, offering a multidimensional view of immune dysfunction [89].
These abnormal cellular mechanopathologies also trigger blood function abnormalities. In sickle cell disease, erythrocyte rigidity directly causes vaso-occlusion, and the resulting thrombi exhibit high stiffness but low fracture toughness, predisposing to embolization [85]. In platelets, mutations in nonmuscle myosin IIA (MYH9-related disorders) impair force generation, leading to deficient clot retraction—a pure mechanical dysfunction [90]. Conversely, in acute myeloid leukemia, malignant cells can actively soften to evade cytotoxic lymphocyte attack at the immune synapse [89]. These examples demonstrate how discrete mechanical failures drive diverse clinical phenotypes through the common lens of dysregulated cellular mechanobiology.
Modulating mechanosensing and mechanotransduction for mechanotherapy
Physical or pharmacological therapeutic approaches targeting blood system mechanical characteristics—a strategy that we term blood mechanotherapy. At the molecular level, “mechanodrugs” such as PIEZO1 blocker GsMTx4 (for hereditary xerocytosis), anti-GPIbα fragment, or CD31 agonist peptides (for vascular inflammation) directly target aberrant force-sensing apparatuses [91–93]. Similarly, inhibiting YAP/transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ) signaling or using lesion-specific nanoparticle delivery (e.g., verteporfin) can counteract proinflammatory mechanotransduction [94]. These interventions aim to reset aberrant activation thresholds for adhesion or aggregation.
Modulation extends to cellular engineering and device design. Targeting the extracellular mechanical microenvironment can modulate cellular behaviors [95,96]. Cells can be mechanically “armed” or “trained”. For instance, surface-anchored polymer frameworks create stealth RBCs that evade immune clearance without compromising deformability, and ex vivo mechanical preconditioning can enhance cell resilience [97,98]. Engineered chimeric antigen receptor T cells expressing extracellular-matrix-degrading enzymes exemplify overcoming biomechanical barriers in solid tumors. On a macroscale, optimizing the hemocompatibility of blood-contacting devices is crucial. This involves introducing biomimetic pulsatility in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), applying endothelium-inspired antithrombotic coatings to prevent factor XII (FXII) activation and using computational fluid dynamics to design geometries that minimize shear stress hotspots in ventricular assist devices (VADs) [99–102].
The key mechanical parameters (such as shear stress and stiffness), recommended reporting standards, and available public resources for blood cell mechanobiology experiments were also summarized in Table 2. Collectively, these strategies aim to restore physiological mechanical homeostasis. Key near term goals need be achieved. First, we need to establish mechanodiagnostic platforms. For example, adding monitoring modules for mechanical properties to existing blood diagnostic equipment not only reduces costs of instrument development but also facilitates clinical translation. Second, we need to standardize mechanical readouts across platforms, embed mechanical end points in clinical samples (e.g., RBC relaxation time and platelet aggregate force under different physiological and pathological conditions), and developing companion diagnostics that match patients to mechanotransduction-targeted therapies.
Conclusion
Less
Viewing blood as a force-interpreting system reframes hematology and vascular immunology. RBCs, leukocytes, and platelets do not merely endure hemodynamic load; they sense, integrate, store and act on mechanical information, with consequences for oxygen delivery, host defense, and hemostasis. Across this review, we synthesized evidence for mechanosensing, mechanical learning and memory, decision-making, and adaptive evolution and outlined how these properties can be measured and therapeutically modulated (Fig. 4A). However, some questions remain unresolved.
Challenges in clinical translation are as follows: (a) We still lack routine, in vivo, spatiotemporal readouts of forces and phenotypes at the cellular resolution; (b) the molecular inventory and biomarker thresholds that distinguish physiological from pathological mechanosense are incomplete, while simultaneously considering patient heterogeneity (age, sex, comorbidities, and device exposure history); (c) there are limited disease-specific models of “dysregulated blood mechanical intelligence” and a need for prospective validation; and (d) practical constraints include cost, standardization, and regulatory readiness for both devices and mechanotherapies (Fig. 4B). Multiple disciplines (physics, cell biology, engineering, and clinical medicine) are now converging to decode and eventually “hack” the body’s mechanical communication networks for better health outcomes. Below, we outline several key future directions that balance visionary ideas with emerging evidence in this field (Fig. 4C).
Future perspectives
Distinguishing physiological from pathological mechanosensing
A near-term priority is to phenotype force–response set points and hysteresis for each blood cell lineage across health and disease. Some mechanical “memory” is adaptive (e.g., wear-mediated splenic culling of old RBCs), whereas persistent stiffening in metabolic disease reduces deformability and shortens lifespan, contributing to hemolysis [103]. Similarly, hypertension and aging synergize to amplify thrombus contractility and stiffness, suggesting that of clots (e.g., aggregate contractile force and elastic modulus) could stratify risk and guide targeted inhibition of GPVI and GPIbα or downstream tension sensors such as ROCK. Thus, establishing age-, sex-, and comorbidity-stratified reference ranges for RBC relaxation time, leukocyte elastic modulus, and platelet aggregate force would provide the field with actionable cutoffs for clinical trials.
“Mechano-omics”: Integrating mechanics with molecular state
A second opportunity is to formalize mechano-omics, integrating calibrated mechanical features with single-cell molecular profiles. Matrix stiffness reprograms hematopoietic stem/progenitor fate via YAP/TAZ and lineage regulators, and these transcriptional states are reversible when cells are returned to compliant niches [86,104]. Electroporation-based lipid bilayer assay for cell surface tension and transcriptomics now couples high-throughput single-cell mechanical readouts with transcriptomes, enabling discovery of gene programs that set membrane tension, cortical prestress, and adhesive thresholds [19]. Building multimodal atlases that fuse mechanics, transcriptomics and epigenetics across hematopoiesis could reveal druggable control points in mechanotransduction and generate companion diagnostics that match patients to mechanotherapies.
Engineering and preconditioning cells for the mechanical milieu
Specific sensors and effectors can encode mechanical intelligence, and they can also be tuned or trained. CRISPR-based modulation of PIEZO channels or integrins and ex vivo mechanical preconditioning (defined shear/stiffness exposure) may harden therapeutic cells against hostile hemodynamics or improve tissue homing. Proof of concept comes from rhesus factor D stealth RBCs, which preserve deformability yet evade alloimmunity in vivo [97], and from microfluidic training regimens that emulate arterial shear or interstitial poroelasticity for platelets and immune cells [85,87,105]. A next step is to codify dose–response curricula (waveform, amplitude, and duty cycle) that produce durable, safe gains in performance.
Mechanically biocompatible environments and digital twins
At device scales, the goal is to design the mechanical environment in vitro to maintain their optimal function. Pulsatile waveforms in ECMO and pumps improve microvascular perfusion and blunt inflammation relative to nonpulsatile flow [99]; endothelium-mimetic, antithrombotic coatings that suppress FXII contact activation reduce thrombosis without heavy anticoagulation [100,101]; and computational-fluid-dynamics/machine-learning-optimized flow paths in VADs minimize turbulence and stagnation, lowering predicted hemolysis and platelet activation [102]. Coupling these interventions to patient-specific digital twins, models that integrate RBC/platelet mechanics with vessel geometry and flow, can identify mechanical risk signatures and prospectively evaluate therapies [26,88,106].
In conclusion, decoding blood’s mechanical language will enable a new class of diagnostics and therapies that act on forces, sensors, and thresholds rather than solely biochemical ligands. As mechano-omics maps expand and mechanotherapies mature, this field is poised for breakthroughs—from developing mechanosensor and mechanotransduction targets to designing cell mechanical modification and blood-compatible devices. This will enable precision medicine based on mechanical information: achieving early disease detection, matching patients with precise mechanical signal targets, and modifying the hemodynamic environment to keep blood cells within safe force ranges. Collectively, these steps translate the biomechanical intelligence of blood into practical solutions for prevention, prognosis, and therapy.
Outstanding questions
•

Resetting memory: Which mechanical memories are reversible, on what timescales, and by which interventions (Ca2+ buffering, histone deacetylase inhibitors, and cytoskeletal drugs)?

•

Causal stacks: Can we phenotype from sensor engagement, state variables, and policy with causal interventions (optogenetic adhesion and mechanopharmacology)?

•

Generalization versus overfitting: Do cells overspecialize to pathological shear/stiffness and lose adaptability (e.g., device-exposed platelets)?

•

Clinical end points: Which mechanical end points (e.g., thrombus contractile force and RBC deformability variance) are prognostic and actionable?

•

Mechano-omics: How do mechanical phenotypes align with transcriptomic/epigenomic states in vivo (paired single-cell assays in patients)?

•

Device ecology: What shear spectra are tolerable in ECMO/VAD without priming maladaptive memories?

Methods
Less
To systematically gather evidence for this review focusing on hematological cells (including RBCs, leukocytes, and platelets), mechanical intelligence and its related mechanisms, diagnosis, and therapy, a comprehensive literature search was performed in 3 electronic academic databases: PubMed, Web of Science and EMBASE. Key search terms were designed to cover the core themes of this review, including combinations of “mechanical sensing”, “mechanotransduction”, “cell intelligence”, “cell learning”, “cell memory”, “hematological cells”, “red blood cell/RBC”, “white blood cell (WBC)/leukocyte”, “platelet”, “hematological cells mechanical intelligence”, “mechanical learning”, “mechanical memory”, “mechanical decision”, “mechanical adaptive evolution”, “PIEZO1”, “mechanosensor”, “shear stress”, “cytoskeleton”, and “mechanical diagnosis”. The literature retrieval covered a time range from 1978 to 2026, ensuring the inclusion of foundational studies on hematocyte mechanical properties and the latest advances in mechanical intelligence research. Additional papers were identified by backward and forward citation chaining of the key sources listed in the reference list. After initial screening based on titles and abstracts to exclude irrelevant studies, full-text articles were reviewed to verify the validity and relevance of the evidence. Only peer-reviewed original research articles and authoritative review papers were included to ensure the reliability of the synthesized evidence. These studies comprehensively cover the mechanical intelligence characteristics of different hematocytes, their molecular regulatory mechanisms, and translational applications in mechanical diagnosis and therapy, providing a solid evidence base for the review.
References
Less
1.
McMillen P, Levin M. Collective intelligence: A unifying concept for integrating biology across scales and substrates. Commun Biol. 2024;7(1):378.
2.
Alisafaei F, Moheimani H, Elson EL, Genin GM. A nuclear basis for mechanointelligence in cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2023;120(19):Article e2303569120.
3.
Cheng B, Li M, Lin M, Guo H, Xu F. Mechanobiology across timescales. Nat Rev Phys. 2025;1–24.
4.
Cheng B, Lu MN, Jia YB, Xu F. Cellular mechanical intelligence. Adv Mech. 2025;55(02):340–377.
5.
Wang SC, Liu Q, Pan T, Li ZD, Xu F, Yao CY. Blood mechanomedicine: Advances in blood biomechanics and mechanobiology and clinical translational prospectives. Chin J Lab Med. 2026;49(1):23–31.
6.
Coste B, Xiao B, Santos JS, Syeda R, Grandl J, Spencer KS, Kim SE, Schmidt M, Mathur J, Dubin AE, et al.Piezo proteins are pore-forming subunits of mechanically activated channels. Nature. 2012;483(7388):176–181.
7.
Coste B, Mathur J, Schmidt M, Earley TJ, Ranade S, Petrus MJ, Dubin AE, Patapoutian A. Piezo1 and Piezo2 are essential components of distinct mechanically activated cation channels. Science. 2010;330(6000):55–60.
8.
Zarychanski R, Schulz VP, Houston BL, Maksimova Y, Houston DS, Smith B, Rinehart J, Gallagher PG. Mutations in the mechanotransduction protein PIEZO1 are associated with hereditary xerocytosis. Blood. 2012;120(9):1908–1915.
9.
Karkempetzaki AI, Ravid K. Piezo1 and its function in different blood cell lineages. Cells. 2024;13(6):482.
10.
Atcha H, Jairaman A, Holt JR, Meli VS, Nagalla RR, Veerasubramanian PK, Brumm KT, Lim HE, Othy S, Cahalan MD, et al.Mechanically activated ion channel Piezo1 modulates macrophage polarization and stiffness sensing. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):3256.
11.
Jeffreys N, Brockman JM, Zhai Y, Ingber DE, Mooney DJ. Mechanical forces amplify TCR mechanotransduction in T cell activation and function. Appl Phys Rev. 2024;11(1):Article 011304.
12.
Du H, Bartleson JM, Butenko S, Alonso V, Liu WF, Winer DA, Butte MJ. Tuning immunity through tissue mechanotransduction. Nat Rev Immunol. 2023;23(3):174–188.
13.
Zhang W, Deng W, Zhou L, Xu Y, Yang W, Liang X, Wang Y, Kulman JD, Zhang XF, Li R. Identification of a juxtamembrane mechanosensitive domain in the platelet mechanosensor glycoprotein Ib-IX complex. Blood. 2015;125(3):562–569.
14.
Savage B, Saldívar E, Ruggeri ZM. Initiation of platelet adhesion by arrest onto fibrinogen or translocation on von Willebrand factor. Cell. 1996;84(2):289–297.
15.
Oshinowo O, Azer SS, Lin J, Lam WA. Why platelet mechanotransduction matters for hemostasis and thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost. 2023;21(9):2339–2353.
16.
Fletcher DA, Mullins RD. Cell mechanics and the cytoskeleton. Nature. 2010;463(7280):485–492.
17.
Pesen T, Akgun B, Unlu MB. Measuring the effect of repetitive stretching on the deformability of human red blood cells using optical tweezers. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):9060.
18.
Gao X, Zhang T, Huang X, Huan X, Li Y. Impact of rise and fall phases of shear on platelet activation and aggregation using microfluidics. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2024;57(4):576–586.
19.
Shiomi A, Kaneko T, Nishikawa K, Tsuchida A, Isoshima T, Sato M, Toyooka K, Doi K, Nishikii H, Shintaku H. High-throughput mechanical phenotyping and transcriptomics of single cells. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):3812.
20.
Karamatic Crew V, Tilley LA, Satchwell TJ, AlSubhi SA, Jones B, Spring FA, Walser PJ, Martins Freire C, Murciano N, Rotordam MG, et al.Missense mutations in PIEZO1, which encodes the Piezo1 mechanosensor protein, define Er red blood cell antigens. Blood. 2023;141(2):135–146.
21.
Tang SKY, Marshall WF. Cell learning. Curr Biol. 2018;28(20):R1180–R1184.
22.
Qiang Y, Liu J, Dao M, Suresh S, Du E. Mechanical fatigue of human red blood cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116(40):19828–19834.
23.
Yang C, Tibbitt MW, Basta L, Anseth KS. Mechanical memory and dosing influence stem cell fate. Nat Mater. 2014;13(6):645–652.
24.
Fischer TM, Stohr-Lissen M, Schmid-Schonbein H. The red cell as a fluid droplet: Tank tread-like motion of the human erythrocyte membrane in shear flow. Science. 1978;202(4370):894–896.
25.
Dupire J, Socol M, Viallat A. Full dynamics of a red blood cell in shear flow. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109(51):20808–20813.
26.
Cheng X, Caruso C, Lam WA, Graham MD. Marginated aberrant red blood cells induce pathologic vascular stress fluctuations in a computational model of hematologic disorders. Sci Adv. 2023;9(48):eadj6423.
27.
Damiano ER, Westheider J, Tozeren A, Ley K. Variation in the velocity, deformation, and adhesion energy density of leukocytes rolling within venules. Circ Res. 1996;79(6):1122–1130.
28.
Morikis VA, Chase S, Wun T, Chaikof EL, Magnani JL, Simon SI. Selectin catch-bonds mechanotransduce integrin activation and neutrophil arrest on inflamed endothelium under shear flow. Blood. 2017;130(19):2101–2110.
29.
Baratchi S, Danish H, Chheang C, Zhou Y, Huang A, Lai A, Khanmohammadi M, Quinn KM, Khoshmanesh K, Peter K. Piezo1 expression in neutrophils regulates shear-induced NETosis. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):7023.
30.
Liu B, Chen W, Evavold BD, Zhu C. Accumulation of dynamic catch bonds between TCR and agonist peptide-MHC triggers T cell signaling. Cell. 2014;157(2):357–368.
31.
Wang J, Lin F, Wan Z, Sun X, Lu Y, Huang J, Wang F, Zeng Y, Chen YH, Shi Y, et al.Profiling the origin, dynamics, and function of traction force in B cell activation. Sci Signal. 2018;11(542):eaai9192.
32.
Marshall BT, Long M, Piper JW, Yago T, McEver RP, Zhu C. Direct observation of catch bonds involving cell-adhesion molecules. Nature. 2003;423(6936):190–193.
33.
Mei F, Guo Y, Wang Y, Zhou Y, Heng BC, Xie M, Huang X, Zhang S, Ding S, Liu F, et al.Matrix stiffness regulates macrophage polarisation via the Piezo1-YAP signalling axis. Cell Prolif. 2024;57(8):Article e13640.
34.
Wang S, Wang B, Shi Y, Moller T, Stegmeyer RI, Strilic B, Li T, Yuan Z, Wang C, Wettschureck N, et al.Mechanosensation by endothelial PIEZO1 is required for leukocyte diapedesis. Blood. 2022;140(3):171–183.
35.
Singam A, Bhattacharya C, Park S. Aging-related changes in the mechanical properties of single cells. Heliyon. 2024;10(12):Article e32974.
36.
Gonzalez-Bermudez B, Kobayashi H, Abarca-Ortega A, Corcoles-Lucas M, Gonzalez-Sanchez M, De la Fuente M, Guinea GV, Elices M, Plaza GR. Aging is accompanied by T-cell stiffening and reduced interstitial migration through dysfunctional nuclear organization. Immunology. 2022;167(4):622–639.
37.
Wang Z, Saxena A, Yan W, Uriarte SM, Siqueira R, Li X. The impact of aging on neutrophil functions and the contribution to periodontitis. Int J Oral Sci. 2025;17(1):10.
38.
Ito Y, Nakamura S, Sugimoto N, Shigemori T, Kato Y, Ohno M, Sakuma S, Ito K, Kumon H, Hirose H, et al.Turbulence activates platelet biogenesis to enable clinical scale ex vivo production. Cell. 2018;174(3):636–648.e618.
39.
Abbonante V, Karkempetzaki AI, Leon C, Krishnan A, Huang N, Di Buduo CA, Cattaneo D, Ward CM, Matsuura S, Guinard I, et al.Newly identified roles for PIEZO1 mechanosensor in controlling normal megakaryocyte development and in primary myelofibrosis. Am J Hematol. 2024;99(3):336–349.
40.
Guinard I, Nguyen T, Brassard-Jollive N, Weber J, Ruch L, Reininger L, Brouard N, Eckly A, Collin D, Lanza F, et al.Matrix stiffness controls megakaryocyte adhesion, fibronectin fibrillogenesis, and proplatelet formation through Itgβ3. Blood Adv. 2023;7(15):4003–4018.
41.
Arce NA, Cao W, Brown AK, Legan ER, Wilson MS, Xu ER, Berndt MC, Emsley J, Zhang XF, Li R. Activation of von Willebrand factor via mechanical unfolding of its discontinuous autoinhibitory module. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):2360.
42.
Tuna R, Yi W, Crespo Cruz E, Romero JP, Ren Y, Guan J, Li Y, Deng Y, Bluestein D, Liu ZL, et al.Platelet biorheology and mechanobiology in thrombosis and hemostasis: Perspectives from multiscale computation. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(9):4800.
43.
Han D, Sun W, Clark KP, Griffith BP, Wu ZJ. Investigation of the role of von Willebrand factor in shear-induced platelet activation and functional alteration under high non-physiological shear stress. Artif Organs. 2024;48(5):514–524.
44.
Kumskova M, Flora GD, Nayak MK, Budnik I, Jain A, Patel RB, Lentz SR, Chauhan AK. Platelets from Ehlers-Danlos syndrome patients exhibit reduced GPVI levels and impaired integrin αIIbβ3 inside-out signaling. Blood. 2023;142:1191.
45.
Nicolai L, Schiefelbein K, Lipsky S, Leunig A, Hoffknecht M, Pekayvaz K, Raude B, Marx C, Ehrlich A, Pircher J, et al.Vascular surveillance by haptotactic blood platelets in inflammation and infection. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):5778.
46.
Coste B, Delmas P. PIEZO ion channels in cardiovascular functions and diseases. Circ Res. 2024;134(5):572–591.
47.
Zhang T, Huang X, Gao X, Liu L, Chen D, Huan X, He C, Li Y. Effect of pathological high shear exposure time on platelet activation and aggregation. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2023;84(2):125–139.
48.
Han D, Zhang J, Griffith BP, Wu ZJ. Models of shear-induced platelet activation and numerical implementation with computational fluid dynamics approaches. J Biomech Eng. 2022;144(4):Article 040801.
49.
Qiu Y, Brown AC, Myers DR, Sakurai Y, Mannino RG, Tran R, Ahn B, Hardy ET, Kee MF, Kumar S, et al.Platelet mechanosensing of substrate stiffness during clot formation mediates adhesion, spreading, and activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111(40):14430–14435.
50.
Hong F, Mollica MY, Golla K, De Silva E, Sniadecki NJ, Lopez JA, Kim H. Filamin A regulates platelet shape change and contractile force generation via phosphorylation of the myosin light chain. Biochem J. 2024;481(20):1395–1410.
51.
Schroer AB, Ventura PB, Sucharov J, Misra R, Chui MKK, Bieri G, Horowitz AM, Smith LK, Encabo K, Tenggara I, et al.Platelet factors attenuate inflammation and rescue cognition in ageing. Nature. 2023;620(7976):1071–1079.
52.
Karakas D, Ni H. Unveiling platelets as immune regulatory cells. Circ Res. 2024;134(8):987–989.
53.
Morris K, Schnoor B, Papa A-L. Platelet cancer cell interplay as a new therapeutic target. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2022;1877(5):Article 188770.
54.
Zhang T, Liu L, Huang X, Gao X, Huan X, He C, Li Y. The rapid change of shear rate gradient is beneficial to platelet activation. Platelets. 2024;35(1):2288679.
55.
Xu XR, Yousef GM, Ni H. Cancer and platelet crosstalk: Opportunities and challenges for aspirin and other antiplatelet agents. Blood. 2018;131(16):1777–1789.
56.
Boilard E, Nigrovic PA, Larabee K, Watts GF, Coblyn JS, Weinblatt ME, Massarotti EM, Remold-O’Donnell E, Farndale RW, Ware J, et al.Platelets amplify inflammation in arthritis via collagen-dependent microparticle production. Science. 2010;327(5965):580–583.
57.
Anjum A, Mader M, Mahameed S, Muraly A, Denorme F, Kliem FP, Rossaro D, Agkol S, Di Fina L, Mulkers M, et al.Aging platelets shift their hemostatic properties to inflammatory functions. Blood. 2025;145(14):1568–1582.
58.
Xu M, Li J, Neves MAD, Zhu G, Carrim N, Yu R, Gupta S, Marshall J, Rotstein O, Peng J, et al.GPIbα is required for platelet-mediated hepatic thrombopoietin generation. Blood. 2018;132(6):622–634.
59.
Li J, Karakas D, Xue F, Chen Y, Zhu G, Yucel YH, MacParland SA, Zhang H, Semple JW, Freedman J, et al.Desialylated platelet clearance in the liver is a novel mechanism of systemic immunosuppression. Research. 2023;6:0236.
60.
Karakas D, Li J, Ma W, Wu XG, Khoury CJ, Masoud M, Hoard B, Liu YJ, Zhu G, Chen J, et al.Kupffer cells are essential for platelet-mediated thrombopoietin generation in the liver. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2025;122(38):Article e2517319122.
61.
Jiang D, Houck KL, Murdiyarso L, Higgins H, Rhoads N, Romero SK, Kozar R, Nascimbene A, Gernsheimer TB, Sanchez ZAC, et al.RBCs regulate platelet function and hemostasis under shear conditions through biophysical and biochemical means. Blood. 2024;144(14):1521–1531.
62.
Sennett C, Pula G. Trapped in the nets: Multiple roles of platelets in the vascular complications associated with neutrophil extracellular traps. Cells. 2025;14(5):335.
63.
Lew VL. The calcium homeostasis of human red blood cells in health and disease: Interactions of PIEZO1, the plasma membrane calcium pump, and Gardos channels. Annu Rev Physiol. 2025;87(1):257–277.
64.
Mukhopadhyay A, Tsukasaki Y, Chan WC, Le JP, Kwok ML, Zhou J, Natarajan V, Mostafazadeh N, Maienschein-Cline M, Papautsky I, et al.Trans-endothelial neutrophil migration activates bactericidal function via Piezo1 mechanosensing. Immunity. 2024;57(1):52–67.e10.
65.
Wang J, Zhao W, Bai W, Dong D, Wang H, Qi X, Thanabalasuriar A, Ye Y, Xu TL, Li H, et al.Piezo1 mediates mechanical reprogramming of neutrophils for proangiogenic specialization in the lung. J Clin Invest. 2025;135(11):Article e183796.
66.
Zainal Abidin NA, Poon EKW, Szydzik C, Timofeeva M, Akbaridoust F, Brazilek RJ, Tovar Lopez FJ, Ma X, Lav C, Marusic I, et al.An extensional strain sensing mechanosome drives adhesion-independent platelet activation at supraphysiological hemodynamic gradients. BMC Biol. 2022;20(1):73.
67.
Makino A, Prossnitz ER, Bunemann M, Wang JM, Yao W, Schmid-Schonbein GW. G protein-coupled receptors serve as mechanosensors for fluid shear stress in neutrophils. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2006;290(6):C1633–C1639.
68.
Schaefer A, Hordijk PL. Cell-stiffness-induced mechanosignaling - A key driver of leukocyte transendothelial migration. J Cell Sci. 2015;128(13):2221–2230.
69.
Ruggeri ZM. Platelet GPIb: Sensing force and responding. Blood. 2015;125(3):423–424.
70.
Mammadova-Bach E, Gudermann T, Braun A. Platelet mechanotransduction: Regulatory cross talk between mechanosensitive receptors and calcium channels. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2023;43(8):1339–1348.
71.
Zhang Y, Ehrlich SM, Zhu C, Du X. Signaling mechanisms of the platelet glycoprotein Ib-IX complex. Platelets. 2022;33(6):823–832.
72.
Liu J, Lu F, Ithychanda SS, Apostol M, Das M, Deshpande G, Plow EF, Qin J. A mechanism of platelet integrin αIIbβ3 outside-in signaling through a novel integrin αIIb subunit-filamin-actin linkage. Blood. 2023;141(21):2629–2641.
73.
Zhu C, Chen W, Lou J, Rittase W, Li K. Mechanosensing through immunoreceptors. Nat Immunol. 2019;20(10):1269–1278.
74.
Kuck L, Kaestner L, Egee S, Lew VL, Simmonds MJ. Mechanotransduction mechanisms in human erythrocytes: Fundamental physiology and clinical significance. Channels. 2025;19(1):2556105.
75.
Cinar E, Zhou S, DeCourcey J, Wang Y, Waugh RE, Wan J. Piezo1 regulates mechanotransductive release of ATP from human RBCs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(38):11783–11788.
76.
Geng J, Shi Y, Zhang J, Yang B, Wang P, Yuan W, Zhao H, Li J, Qin F, Hong L, et al.TLR4 signalling via Piezo1 engages and enhances the macrophage mediated host response during bacterial infection. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):3519.
77.
Paknikar AK, Eltzner B, Koster S. Direct characterization of cytoskeletal reorganization during blood platelet spreading. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2019;144:166–176.
78.
Fu T, Sullivan DP, Gonzalez AM, Haynes ME, Dalal PJ, Rutledge NS, Tierney AL, Yescas JA, Weber EW, Muller WA. Mechanotransduction via endothelial adhesion molecule CD31 initiates transmigration and reveals a role for VEGFR2 in diapedesis. Immunity. 2023;56(10):2311–2324 e2316.
79.
Liu L, Zhang Q, Xiao S, Sun Z, Ding S, Chen Y, Wang L, Yin X, Liao F, Jiang LH, et al.Inhibition of shear-induced platelet aggregation by xueshuantong via targeting Piezo1 channel-mediated Ca2+ signaling pathway. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:Article 606245.
80.
Li N, Chen S, Xu K, He MT, Dong MQ, Zhang QC, Gao N. Structural basis of membrane skeleton organization in red blood cells. Cell. 2023;186(9):1912–1929 e1918.
81.
Ostuni R, Piccolo V, Barozzi I, Polletti S, Termanini A, Bonifacio S, Curina A, Prosperini E, Ghisletti S, Natoli G. Latent enhancers activated by stimulation in differentiated cells. Cell. 2013;152(1-2):157–171.
82.
Cai G, Lu Y, Zhong W, Wang T, Li Y, Ruan X, Chen H, Sun L, Guan Z, Li G, et al.Piezo1-mediated M2 macrophage mechanotransduction enhances bone formation through secretion and activation of transforming growth factor-β1. Cell Prolif. 2023;56(9):Article e13440.
83.
Alimohamadi H, Rangamani P. Effective cell membrane tension protects red blood cells against malaria invasion. PLOS Comput Biol. 2023;19(12):Article e1011694.
84.
Rao H, Wang M, Wu Y, Wu Y, Han C, Yan C, Zhang L, Wang J, Liu Y. In vitro investigation of the mechanics of fixed red blood cells based on optical trap micromanipulation and image analysis. Biomed Opt Express. 2024;15(6):3783–3794.
85.
Amirouche A, Esteves J, Lavoignat A, Picot S, Ferrigno R, Faivre M. Dual shape recovery of red blood cells flowing out of a microfluidic constriction. Biomicrofluidics. 2020;14(2):Article 024116.
86.
Gural A, Pajic-Lijakovic I, Barshtein G. Mechanical stimulation of red blood cells aging: Focusing on the microfluidics application. Micromachines. 2025;16(3):259.
87.
Isiksacan Z, D’Alessandro A, Wolf SM, McKenna DH, Tessier SN, Kucukal E, Gokaltun AA, William N, Sandlin RD, Bischof J, et al.Assessment of stored red blood cells through lab-on-a-chip technologies for precision transfusion medicine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2023;120(32):Article e2115616120.
88.
Deltadahl S, Gilbey J, Van Laer C, Boeckx N, Leers MPG, Freeman T, Aiken L, Farren T, Smith M, Zeina M, et al.Deep generative classification of blood cell morphology. Nat Mach Intell. 2025;7(11):1791–1803.
89.
Mittelheisser V, Gensbittel V, Bonati L, Li W, Tang L, Goetz JG. Evidence and therapeutic implications of biomechanically regulated immunosurveillance in cancer and other diseases. Nat Nanotechnol. 2024;19(3):281–297.
90.
Baumann J, Sachs L, Otto O, Schoen I, Nestler P, Zaninetti C, Kenny M, Kranz R, von Eysmondt H, Rodriguez J, et al.Reduced platelet forces underlie impaired hemostasis in mouse models of MYH9-related disease. Sci Adv. 2022;8(20):Article eabn2627.
91.
Bae C, Gnanasambandam R, Nicolai C, Sachs F, Gottlieb PA. Xerocytosis is caused by mutations that alter the kinetics of the mechanosensitive channel PIEZO1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(12):E1162–E1168.
92.
Caligiuri G. CD31 as a therapeutic target in atherosclerosis. Circ Res. 2020;126(9):1178–1189.
93.
Zheng L, Adili R, Wu Z, Zhang Q, Zhu G, Lei X, Liu Z, Neves MAD, Ma W, Slavkovic S, et al.Preventative and therapeutic effects of a novel humanized anti-glycoprotein Ibα fragment of antigen-binding region in a murine model of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. J Thromb Haemost. 2025;23(5):1596–1607.
94.
Huang HC, Wang TY, Rousseau J, Orlando M, Mungaray M, Michaud C, Plaisier C, Chen ZB, Wang KC. Biomimetic nanodrug targets inflammation and suppresses YAP/TAZ to ameliorate atherosclerosis. Biomaterials. 2024;306:Article 122505.
95.
Yang J, Wang P, Zhang Y, Zhang M, Sun Q, Chen H, Dong L, Chu Z, Xue B, Hoff WD, et al.Photo-tunable hydrogels reveal cellular sensing of rapid rigidity changes through the accumulation of mechanical signaling molecules. Cell Stem Cell. 2025;32(1):121–136.e126.
96.
Liu X, Zhang M, Wang P, Zheng K, Wang X, Xie W, Pan X, Shen R, Liu R, Ding J, et al.Nanoscale distribution of bioactive ligands on biomaterials regulates cell mechanosensing through translocation of actin into the nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2025;122(10):Article e2501264122.
97.
Zhao Y, Fan M, Chen Y, Liu Z, Shao C, Jin B, Wang X, Hui L, Wang S, Liao Z, et al.Surface-anchored framework for generating RhD-epitope stealth red blood cells. Sci Adv. 2020;6(12):eaaw9679.
98.
Steadman E, Steadman D, Rubenstein DA, Yin W. Platelet and endothelial cell responses under concurrent shear stress and tensile strain. Microvasc Res. 2024;151:Article 104613.
99.
Hong JK, Waterhouse A. Bioinspired approaches to engineer antithrombogenic medical devices for vascular intervention. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2023;43(6):797–812.
100.
Luu CH, Nguyen NT, Ta HT. Unravelling surface modification strategies for preventing medical device-induced thrombosis. Adv Healthc Mater. 2024;13(1):Article e2301039.
101.
Ji H, Yu K, Abbina S, Xu L, Xu T, Cheng S, Vappala S, Arefi SMA, Rana MM, Chafeeva I, et al.Antithrombotic coating with sheltered positive charges prevents contact activation by controlling factor XII-biointerface binding. Nat Mater. 2025;24(4):626–636.
102.
Bounouib M, Taha-Janan M, Maazouzi W. Optimization of hemocompatibility metrics in ventricular assist device design using machine learning and CFD-based response surface analysis. Int J Artif Organs. 2025;48(6):367–383.
103.
Ebrahimi S, Bagchi P. A computational study of red blood cell deformability effect on hemodynamic alteration in capillary vessel networks. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):4304.
104.
Zhang X, Cao D, Xu L, Xu Y, Gao Z, Pan Y, Jiang M, Wei Y, Wang L, Liao Y, et al.Harnessing matrix stiffness to engineer a bone marrow niche for hematopoietic stem cell rejuvenation. Cell Stem Cell. 2023;30(4):378–395.e378.
105.
Tabdanov ED, Rodriguez-Merced NJ, Cartagena-Rivera AX, Puram VV, Callaway MK, Ensminger EA, Pomeroy EJ, Yamamoto K, Lahr WS, Webber BR, et al.Engineering T cells to enhance 3D migration through structurally and mechanically complex tumor microenvironments. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):2815.
106.
Walter W, Pohlkamp C, Meggendorfer M, Nadarajah N, Kern W, Haferlach C, Haferlach T. Artificial intelligence in hematological diagnostics: Game changer or gadget? Blood Rev. 2023;58:Article 101019.
107.
Baier D, Muller T, Mohr T, Windberger U. Red blood cell stiffness and adhesion are species-specific properties strongly affected by temperature and medium changes in single cell force spectroscopy. Molecules. 2021;26(9):2771.
108.
Inoue M, Udono Y, Kato Y, Fukui K, Watanabe N. Evaluation of erythrocyte membrane oxidation due to their exposure to shear flow generated by extracorporeal blood pump. Int J Artif Organs. 2024;47(3):155–161.
109.
Matthews K, Lamoureux ES, Myrand-Lapierre ME, Duffy SP, Ma H. Technologies for measuring red blood cell deformability. Lab Chip. 2022;22(7):1254–1274.
110.
Strijkova-Kenderova V, Todinova S, Andreeva T, Bogdanova D, Langari A, Danailova A, Krumova S, Zlatareva E, Kalaydzhiev N, Milanov I, et al.Morphometry and stiffness of red blood cells-signatures of neurodegenerative diseases and aging. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;23(1):227.
111.
Yale P, Kouacou MA, Konin JE, Megnassan E, Zoueu JT. Lateral deformation of human red blood cells by optical tweezers. Micromachines. 2021;12(9):1024.
112.
Zheng Y, Cachia MA, Ge J, Xu Z, Wang C, Sun Y. Mechanical differences of sickle cell trait (SCT) and normal red blood cells. Lab Chip. 2015;15(15):3138–3146.
113.
Moura Rosa P, Gopalakrishnan N, Ibrahim H, Haug M, Halaas O. The intercell dynamics of T cells and dendritic cells in a lymph node-on-a-chip flow device. Lab Chip. 2016;16(19):3728–3740.
114.
Thauland TJ, Hu KH, Bruce MA, Butte MJ. Cytoskeletal adaptivity regulates T cell receptor signaling. Sci Signal. 2017;10(469):eaah3737.
115.
Wang Q, Wang M, Li S, Xing X, Liu X, Dong S, Cai J. AFM detection of mitogen-induced morphological changes in human b lymphocyte. Scanning. 2012;34(1):60–67.
116.
Rheinlaender J, Vogel S, Seifert J, Schachtele M, Borst O, Lang F, Gawaz M, Schaffer TE. Imaging the elastic modulus of human platelets during thrombin-induced activation using scanning ion conductance microscopy. Thromb Haemost. 2015;113(2):305–311.
117.
Li A, Chen J, Liang ZH, Cai J, Cai HH, Chen M. Comparison of ultrastructural and nanomechanical signature of platelets from acute myocardial infarction and platelet activation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2017;486(2):245–251.
118.
Sachs L, Denker C, Greinacher A, Palankar R. Quantifying single-platelet biomechanics: An outsider’s guide to biophysical methods and recent advances. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2020;4(3):386–401.
Appendix
Less
Year 2026 volume 9 Issue 2
PDF
110
61
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.34133/research.1157
  • Receive Date：2025-11-24
  • Online Date：2026-10-16
  • Published：2026-02-20
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received：2025-11-24
  • Revised：2026-01-28
  • Accepted：2026-01-29
Affiliations
    1Department of Blood Transfusion, The First Affiliated Hospital (Southwest Hospital) of Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, P.R. China.
    2PLA Chongqing Blood Center, Chongqing 400038, P.R. China.
    3MOE Key Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering, Bioinspired Engineering and Biomechanics Center, School of Life Science and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, P.R. China.
    4Bioinspired Engineering and Biomechanics Center (BEBC), School of Life Science and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, P.R. China.
    5Hainan General Hospital, Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570311, P.R. China.

Corresponding:

* Corresponding authors: (T.W.);
* (B.C.);
* (F.X.);
* (C.Y.)
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/research/EN/10.34133/research.1157
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family		 属数
Number of
genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)		 属
Genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT
Links
Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read
Collections
Updates
Events
News
Multimedia
About
About Us
Contact
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
100081
010-62662699(Operation and Technical Support)
qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House