收藏切换
Lactylation Modification: From Basic Biological Process to Clinical Cardiovascular Diseases
收藏切换
PDF
Jilong Geng1, Zheyan Fang1, Zhentao Zhang1, Junbo Ge1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, *, Hua Li1, *
Research. Vol 9 Article ID 1228
Less
收藏切换
Research. Vol 9 Article ID 1228
• REVIEW ARTICLE •
Lactylation Modification: From Basic Biological Process to Clinical Cardiovascular Diseases
Full
Jilong Geng1, Zheyan Fang1, Zhentao Zhang1, Junbo Ge1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, *, Hua Li1, *
Affiliations
  • 1Department of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
  • 2Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Shanghai 200032, China.
  • 3State Key Laboratory of Cardiology, Shanghai 200032, China.
  • 4National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai 200032, China.
  • 5Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai 200032, China.
  • 6Key Laboratory of Viral Heart Diseases, National Health Commission, Shanghai 200032, China.
  • 7Key Laboratory of Viral Heart Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai 200032, China.
About Author:

† These authors contributed equally to this work.

Published: 2026-04-20 doi: 10.34133/research.1228
Outline
收藏切换

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain the leading cause of death worldwide and are hallmarked by profound disturbances in energy metabolism and maladaptive tissue remodeling. Lactate, long dismissed as a metabolic waste product, is now recognized as a context-dependent central carbon source and signaling metabolite. A key recent advance is the discovery of lysine lactylation (Kla), an evolutionarily conserved posttranslational modification that couples lactate abundance to chromatin state and protein function. Here, we synthesize current knowledge on the biogenesis and enzymatic regulation of Kla, and delineate how lactate-driven histone and nonhistone lactylation remodel transcriptional and signaling networks controlling fibrosis, energy metabolism, immune and inflammatory responses, and angiogenesis. We then focus on emerging evidence that Kla is a nodal regulator across major cardiovascular pathologies—including atherosclerosis, myocardial infarction and ischemia/reperfusion injury, heart failure, valvular and arterial calcification, and pulmonary hypertension—where it can act as a context-dependent “accelerator” or “brake” of disease progression. Finally, we outline a translational framework that targets the lactate–lactylation axis at 3 levels: lactate transport, lactate production, and lactylation writers/erasers, highlighting opportunities and challenges for therapeutic intervention. Together, these insights position protein lactylation as a pivotal metabolic–epigenetic interface in the cardiovascular system and a promising entry point for precision therapies in CVDs.

Jilong Geng, Zheyan Fang, Zhentao Zhang, Junbo Ge, Hua Li. Lactylation Modification: From Basic Biological Process to Clinical Cardiovascular Diseases[J]. Research, 2026 , 9 (4) : 1228 - . DOI: 10.34133/research.1228
Lactate, long regarded simply as a metabolic byproduct of anaerobic glycolysis, is now recognized as a crucial metabolite with diverse signaling functions that modulate cellular processes through multiple pathways [1,2]. A major recent advance in lactate research is the identification of lactylation, a novel posttranslational modification (PTM) in which lactyl groups are covalently attached to lysine residues on histone and nonhistone proteins [3]. This modification provides a direct biochemical connection between cellular metabolic states and transcriptional regulation, offering new mechanistic insights into how metabolic intermediates shape gene expression programs and cellular behavior.
Lactylation was initially identified on histones, where it was shown to directly regulate chromatin structure and gene transcription [4]. Subsequent studies revealed that this acylation also occurs on a broad spectrum of nonhistone substrates, thereby influencing diverse biological processes, including immune responses, fibrosis, and cellular differentiation [5]. The dynamic regulation of this modification is mediated by enzymatic “writers”, “readers”, and “erasers” and is tightly coupled to glycolytic flux and the availability of intracellular lactate. As new experimental data continue to emerge, these advances have substantially deepened understanding of how metabolic signals induce persistent changes in cellular phenotypes.
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), including myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure, and atherosclerosis, are characterized by metabolic reprogramming, immune activation, and tissue remodeling—processes that intersect with lactate accumulation and lactylation dynamics [6]. Mounting evidence suggests that protein lactylation is a key regulatory node in CVDs, modulating endothelial homeostasis, macrophage polarization, fibrotic remodeling, and neovascularization [7]. Collectively, these findings support the notion that lactylation functions as both an “accelerator and brake” across major cardiovascular pathologies. However, with the rapidly expanding body of research on lactylation, rigorous synthesis and critical appraisal of these data have become increasingly necessary. Particularly when conflicts arise among findings across different disciplines, systematic integration and critical analysis are required. In this review, recent advances in lactylation research are systematically summarized, with particular emphasis on elucidating its multifaceted roles in cardiovascular homeostasis and disease. The aim of this review is to refine current conceptual frameworks of lactylation and to propose plausible therapeutic strategies targeting this modification in CVD.
Lysine lactylation (Kla) consists of 2 stereoisomeric variants, KD-la and KL-la (Fig. 1). Recent studies indicated that KL-la is the predominant Kla variant [8,9]. This modification has been observed on both histone and nonhistone substrates, and its abundance is modulated by fluctuations in glycolytic flux. In view of its predominance and regulatory relevance, the present discussion primarily focuses on KL-la. In contrast, KD-la is generated nonenzymatically through the reaction of lysine residues with lactoylglutathione (LGSH), without requiring enzymatic catalysis [10] (Fig. 1A). Elucidation of the mechanisms underlying Kla is essential for a better understanding of its role in disease development, particularly in cardiovascular disorders.
Under physiological conditions, lactate production increases when cellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP) demand exceeds the capacity of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), such as during intense exercise or hypoxia [11]. As a key metabolic intermediate, lactate is predominantly produced from pyruvate generated by glycolysis (Fig. 1B). While pyruvate can be directed into mitochondrial oxidation under normoxia, it is reduced to lactate by cytosolic lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA) under hypoxia [12,13]. Notably, the conversion of pyruvate to lactate also occurs under aerobic conditions, even when oxygen is abundant [14].
Excess lactate accumulation can be detrimental and may lead to lactic acidosis [15]. However, lactate clearance does not imply disposal; rather, it reflects metabolic recycling and conversion into other usable substrates. The reutilization of lactate primarily proceeds via 2 metabolic pathways (Fig. 1B). Lactate is oxidized back to pyruvate by lactate dehydrogenase B (LDHB), thereby supporting oxidative energy metabolism in high-demand organs such as the heart and brain [16]. Alternatively, lactate undergoes gluconeogenic conversion, predominantly in hepatic and renal tissues, via the Cori cycle to replenish blood glucose levels [17]. Collectively, these coordinated pathways prevent the toxic accumulation of lactate and help maintain cellular energy homeostasis.
The transport of lactate across cell membranes is primarily mediated by proton-coupled monocarboxylate transporters MCT1 to MCT4 (SLC16 family) [18,19]. They enable the bidirectional transport of lactate driven by the combined concentration gradients of lactate and protons [20]. Among them, MCT1 and MCT4 serve as the principal mediators of lactate transport (Fig. 1B). MCT1, ubiquitously expressed, predominantly facilitates lactate uptake into oxidative cells (e.g., cardiac myocytes, slow-twitch muscle fibers, and hepatocytes), thereby supporting aerobic metabolism and gluconeogenesis [21]. In contrast, MCT4, enriched in glycolytic cells (e.g., fast-twitch muscle fibers), is mainly responsible for lactate efflux [19,22]. This functional divergence forms the basis of the lactate shuttle hypothesis [23,24]. MCT2 and MCT3 display more restricted expression patterns (e.g., neuron and retinal pigment epithelia, respectively) [25,26]. In epithelial barriers, sodium-coupled monocarboxylate transporters SMCTs (SLC5 family) can additionally contribute to lactate uptake/reabsorption, particularly in the intestine and kidney [27]. Collectively, these diverse roles position MCTs/SMCTs as a sophisticated network critical for lactate transport, metabolic integration, and the preservation of tissue and cellular energy homeostasis.
The lactylation pathway is initiated by the metabolic conversion of lactate to its high-energy thioester, lactyl-coenzyme A (CoA). This activated conjugate serves as the requisite donor of lactyl groups to target proteins. It has been demonstrated that acetyl-CoA synthetase 2 (ACSS2) functions as a bona fide lactyl-CoA synthetase, catalyzing the formation of this metabolite [28]. Another nuclear-localized enzyme, guanosine triphosphate (GTP)-specific succinyl-CoA synthetase (GTPSCS), has also been shown to generate lactyl-CoA [29]. The lactyl-CoA pool generated through these pathways functions as a critical link that integrates metabolic signals to regulate a broad spectrum of cellular activities through the modification of diverse protein substrates.
PTMs are regulated by 3 classes of enzymes: writers, readers, and erasers [30]. Similarly, the spatiotemporal control of Kla requires the coordinated action of these enzymes (Fig. 1C). Lactyltransferases (writers) transfer lactyl groups to lysine residues. Among these lactyltransferases, histone acetyltransferases (HATs) represent major enzymatic contributors, with key representatives spanning the p300/CBP [31], GNAT (e.g., GCN5) [32], and MYST (TIP60, HBO1, MOF, and ESCO2) [33–36] families. Beyond canonical HATs, other acetyltransferase-related enzymes including DLAT [37] and ACAT [38] also participate in mediating Kla. Furthermore, alanyl-tRNA synthetases (AARS1/2) act as ATP-dependent lactyltransferases that couple lactate and ATP to globally modulate the lactylome [39]. Lactylation is interpreted by lactylation-specific reader proteins. For example, BRG1 binds H3K18 lactylation (H3K18la) via its bromodomain to promote mesenchymal–epithelial transition [40]. In addition, DPF2 (a subunit of the BAF complex) interacts with H3K14 lactylation (H3K14la) through its DPF domain [41]. Delactylation is mediated by deacylases (Erasers) including class I histone deacetylases (HDAC1 to HDAC3 and HDAC8) [42,43] and sirtuins (SIRT1 to SIRT3) [44,45]. Recent studies further suggest that SIRT6 functions as a histone delactylase; however, whether it also participates in nonhistone delactylation remains to be determined [46]. Together, these coordinated writer, reader, and eraser activities ensure dynamic and context-dependent regulation of the Kla landscape. Dissecting this enzymatic network is crucial for understanding how lactate-driven signaling shapes gene expression and may reveal new therapeutic targets in cardiovascular and other diseases.
As research progresses, an increasingly broad range of functional roles associated with lactylation is being uncovered. In general, histone lactylation primarily acts at the level of gene transcription, modulating the expression of specific target genes. By contrast, lactylation of nonhistone proteins influences a broad spectrum of functional properties, including catalytic activity, conformational or structural stability, intracellular localization and trafficking, and the capacity to interact with other macromolecules within the cell (Fig. 2).
Histone lactylation represents a novel epigenetic mark that activates chromatin and stimulates transcription of target genes. This modification functions analogously to established histone PTMs such as methylation, phosphorylation, and acetylation, all of which regulate gene expression by remodeling nucleosome architecture [47] (Fig. 2A). Lactylation has been identified at multiple lysine residues across histones H1, H2B, H3, and H4, with potential implications for gene regulatory networks and disease pathogenesis [48–50].
Current research has predominantly focused on the lactylation site H3K18, whereas other identified sites (e.g., H3K9 and H4K12) remain poorly characterized. Von Meyenn and colleagues [51] generated genome-wide datasets demonstrating the prevalence of H3K18la across diverse cell types and tissues. This epigenetic mark localizes to both active promoters—particularly those enriched for CpG islands—and tissue-specific enhancers [51]. H3K18la levels exhibit positive correlations with gene expression and with other active histone marks. Key transcriptional targets of H3K18la include leucine-rich alpha-2-glycoprotein 1 (LRG1), vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA), interleukin-10 (IL-10) [52], major zygotic genome activation (ZGA) genes [53,54], POM121 [55], and VCAM1 [56]. Histone lactylation is increasingly recognized as a contributor to CVD, with H3K18la implicated in atherosclerosis [57], MI [58], heart failure [59], arterial calcification [60], and aortic aneurysm/dissection [61]. In addition, lactylation of H3K9 and H4K12 (H3K9la, H4K12la) has also been reported to promote atherosclerotic development [62,63]. In summary, further elucidation of the full spectrum of lactylation sites and their gene-specific transcriptional outcomes will be essential for clarifying disease mechanisms and for exploring histone lactylation as a potential therapeutic target.
The effects of lactylation on enzymatic catalytic activity vary across different conditions (Fig. 2B). Specifically, lactylation can exert inhibitory effects on enzyme function in certain pathological contexts. For instance, lactylation of malate dehydrogenase 2 (MDH2) at Lys241 during myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury inhibits its catalytic function in the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle [64]. Additionally, during aortic dissection, ATP5F1A (ATP synthase subunit) undergoes K531 lactylation, which impairs ATP synthase activity [65]. By contrast, lactylation can also enhance the catalytic activity of enzymes. Lactylation of METTL16 at K229 augments its ability to methylate FDX1 mRNA, which can induce cuproptosis by stabilizing FDX1 [45]. In sum, lactylation-mediated regulation of catalytic activity exhibits a clear duality: It can either enhance or inhibit enzyme function, with these divergent outcomes closely linked to the specific enzyme targets and the environmental contexts in which they operate.
Lactylation directly modulates protein–protein interaction patterns, not only disrupting existing interactions but also enhancing them or creating new ones (Fig. 2C). The p300-catalyzed and SIRT1-reversed lactylation of α-myosin heavy chain (α-MHC) at Lys1897 enhances its interaction with Titin, thereby maintaining sarcomeric stability and supporting cardiac structure and contractile function [66]. In radiation-induced heart disease (RIHD), K311 lactylation of protein disulfide-isomerase (P4HB) promotes its binding to prostaglandin G/H synthase 2 (PTGS2), thereby driving RIHD-associated pathogenic signaling [67]. In contrast, lactylation can also disrupt protein–protein interactions (PPIs) that are critical for cellular homeostasis. Lactylation of Tufm at Lys286 reduces its interaction with Tomm40, thereby compromising mitophagy and contributing to neuronal apoptosis in traumatic brain injury [68]. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that lactylation functions as a versatile molecular switch that remodels protein–protein interaction networks in a context-dependent manner, thereby fine-tuning essential cellular processes while also predisposing to pathology when dysregulated.
Lactylation exerts a bidirectional regulatory role—either promoting or inhibiting protein degradation—by directly modifying key molecules in degradation pathways (Fig. 2D). The primary regulatory routes involve protein degradation via the ubiquitin–proteasome system or lysosomal clearance. Within proteasome-dependent degradation, lactylation of Axin1 at Lys147 decreases its stability by enhancing ubiquitination and targeting the protein for proteasomal breakdown [69]. Conversely, lactylation can impair ubiquitination, as exemplified by Serpina3k lactylation at Lys351 [70]. In cardiac fibroblasts, lactylated Serpina3k displays a markedly prolonged half-life, and its turnover is largely abolished by the proteasome inhibitor MG132, supporting lactylation-mediated suppression of proteasome-dependent degradation [70]. In lysosome-dependent degradation, lactylation can redirect protein trafficking to lysosomal pathways, with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) providing a notable example [71]. Specifically, lactylation of amyloid precursor protein (APP) at Lys612 modulates its metabolism, reducing amyloid-β (Aβ) production in AD. This modification shifts APP trafficking away from BACE1-mediated cleavage, directing it instead toward CD2AP-dependent endosomal–lysosomal degradation [71]. Ongoing investigation of this bidirectional regulation of protein degradation by lactylation is expected to clarify how diverse metabolic states orchestrate protein homeostasis.
Lactylation can affect intracellular protein localization by altering physicochemical properties or the efficiency of signal recognition between proteins and transport molecules (Fig. 2E). Specifically, p300-mediated lactylation of ABCF1 at Lys430 induces conformational changes that expose the C-terminal nuclear localization signal (NLS), thereby facilitating its nuclear translocation [72]. Additionally, in neutrophils following myocardial I/R injury, S100a9 lactylation at Lys26 facilitates its importin β1-dependent nuclear translocation, where S100a9 functions as a transcriptional coactivator to up-regulate migration/adhesion-related genes [37]. In contrast, p300/CBP-mediated lactylation triggers the translocation of HMGB1 to the cytoplasm, facilitating its extracellular secretion via exosomes [73,74]. Similarly, lactylation drives the nuclear-to-cytoplasmic translocation of CIRP, followed by its release into the extracellular milieu during sepsis. This extracellular CIRP then enables macrophages to regulate pulmonary vascular endothelial cell (PVEC) death [75]. Collectively, lactylation dynamically regulates the subcellular localization of proteins, enabling them to adapt to the physiological and pathological needs of cells.
Transcriptional regulation represents a primary function of lactylation. This process not only modulates gene expression by altering chromatin architecture but also directly modifies transcription factors, thereby regulating the expression of key proteins implicated in various diseases [76,77]. Lactylation of Snail1 and Twist1 enhances transcriptional activity, leading to increased transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) expression [78,79]. In atherosclerosis, Sox10 lactylation activates transcriptional programs that promote vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) transdifferentiation [80]. Therefore, lactylation serves as a direct and potent modulator of transcriptional networks, governing gene expression by targeting both chromatin and specific transcription factors across diverse physiological and pathological contexts.
Fibrosis, characterized by excessive extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition, is a shared end-stage feature across major CVDs, including fibrous cap formation in atherosclerotic plaques, post-ischemic ventricular remodeling, heart failure progression, and hypertensive vascular remodeling [81]. Fibrosis-driven remodeling is a central determinant of cardiac stiffness, ventricular dysfunction, and adverse outcomes after myocardial injury [82]. Emerging evidence supports lactylation as a metabolic–epigenetic switch that reshapes chromatin states and transcription factor activity toward a pro-fibrotic program (Fig. 3A). In vascular and cardiac remodeling contexts, endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EndoMT) represents a key fibrogenic route: In atherosclerosis, increased H3K18la has been associated with up-regulated Snail1 expression, thereby promoting EndoMT [57]. After MI, lactylation of Snail1 activates TGF-β1 transcription and the downstream TGF-β/Smad2 signaling pathway, thereby driving EndoMT and exacerbating fibrotic progression [78]. Similar to Snail1, Twist1, another pro-EndoMT transcription factor, has also been reported to undergo lactylation, thereby promoting EndoMT by enhancing TGF-β1 expression [79]. In addition, recent evidence from pulmonary fibrosis demonstrated that lactate-induced H3K18la suppresses the ubiquitin ligase carboxyl terminus of Hsc70-interacting protein (CHIP), thereby inhibiting TGF-β1 degradation and sustaining pro-fibrotic signaling, which further broadens the mechanistic link between lactate accumulation and TGF-β pathway activation [83]. Moreover, in the context of diabetic nephropathy, H3K18la has been shown to increase the expression of IL-1β and NLRP3, triggering a local inflammatory cascade that further exacerbates EndoMT [84]. Taken together, although some of these mechanisms have not yet been directly confirmed in cardiovascular tissues, the available evidence suggests that lactylation may facilitate cardiovascular remodeling by promoting EndoMT and reinforcing TGF-β1-related pro-fibrotic signaling.
Beyond the cardiovascular system, accumulating studies in lung, liver, and kidney fibrosis further indicate that lactylation is broadly pro-fibrotic across organs, while the upstream triggers and cell-type targets appear to be context-dependent. In pulmonary fibrosis models, lactylation has been implicated in (a) direct activation of fibroblasts toward a myofibroblast-like state [85–87], (b) promotion of epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT)-linked programs [88], and (c) modulation of macrophage inflammatory signaling [89], which can secondarily enhance fibroblast activation and ECM deposition. In liver fibrosis, lactylation-associated programs have been linked to hepatic stellate cell activation, a central driver of collagen production and scar formation [90–92]. In kidney fibrosis, lactylation has been associated with EMT-related pathways and with macrophage-to-myofibroblast transition, both contributing to interstitial matrix accumulation [93,94]. Together, these multi-organ observations underscore the substantial contribution of lactylation to the progression of fibrosis.
CVDs are inherently energy-dependent, and lactate is one of the most sensitive metabolic indicators under hypoxic conditions [95,96]. Lactylation, as both a product of metabolic reprogramming and a mechanism that drives it, can reshape both glycolysis and mitochondrial metabolism, creating a metabolic feedback loop (Fig. 3B).
Lactylation has been shown to regulate OXPHOS by modulating key mitochondrial enzymes. As previously discussed, lactylation of MDH2 at Lys241 in myocardial I/R injury and of ATP5F1A at Lys531 in aortic dissection both impair enzyme activity, disrupting OXPHOS, and ultimately reducing ATP production [64,65]. In aortic aneurysm and dissection (AAD), elevated H4K16la promotes the transcription of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1 (PDK1), thereby inhibiting pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) and shifting glucose-derived pyruvate away from mitochondrial oxidation toward lactate production in VSMCs [97]. Additionally, under hypoxic stress, cells, particularly muscle cells, show increased expression of AARS2, which catalyzes lactylation at Lys457/458 of CPT2 and at Lys336 of PDHA1 [98]. The resultant lactylation inactivates these 2 enzymes, thereby restricting acetyl-CoA production from pyruvate and fatty acid oxidation, ultimately suppressing OXPHOS.
In contrast to its impact on mitochondrial metabolism, lactylation also influences glycolytic pathways. Several studies have shown that histone lactylation (e.g., H3K9la and H4K12la) up-regulates glycolysis-associated genes, including HIF-1α, PKM2, and LDHA, which drive the shift toward a glycolytic phenotype [99–101]. However, lactylation of key glycolytic enzymes can have a suppressive effect. For example, lactylation of ALDOA, PKM2, and PFKP has been shown to inhibit glycolysis, suggesting that lactylation can both promote and inhibit glycolytic flux depending on the context and the specific target [102–105]. These findings highlight lactylation as a pivotal regulator of energy metabolism, balancing the demands of glycolysis and mitochondrial function in response to metabolic stress.
The immune and inflammatory responses are fundamental biological processes that maintain tissue homeostasis and protect the host from pathogens. In CVDs, these responses are not merely bystanders but active drivers of lesion evolution and tissue repair, requiring immune cells to rapidly adapt to changing microenvironmental cues [106]. Among these immune populations, macrophages are especially prominent orchestrators of cardiovascular inflammation and post-injury remodeling, given their abundance within lesions and their capacity for dynamic functional switching [107]. The phenotypic switch in macrophages, particularly between M1 (inflammatory) and M2 (reparative) states, is central to determining the fate of cardiovascular tissues in response to injury. Emerging evidence further indicates that metabolic reprogramming of macrophages critically shapes their activation states and effector functions in CVDs [108].
In line with this immunometabolic remodeling, lactate accumulation driven by enhanced glycolysis gives rise to protein lactylation, which has recently been recognized as a key regulator of macrophage phenotypic reprogramming in response to polarizing stimuli (Fig. 3C). For example, Irizarry-Caro et al. [109] demonstrated that the Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling adapter BCAP promotes the inflammatory-to-reparative macrophage transition by enhancing histone lactylation. Mechanistically, elevated H3K18 lactylation up-regulates reparative genes (e.g., ARG1, KLF4, VEGFA, and IL-10), thereby restoring cardiac immune homeostasis and function [52,110]. Furthermore, increased H3K18 lactylation can induce expression of the m6A demethylase ALKBH5, which subsequently reduces methylation of NLRP3 mRNA and suppresses inflammasome activation [111]. Beyond histone modifications, lactylation of nonhistone proteins in macrophages, such as PKM2 and Mecp2, also contributes to M2 polarization [105,112].
Conversely, lactylation has been implicated in shifting macrophage polarization toward the pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype. For instance, in the type 2 diabetic myocardium, elevated H4K12 lactylation activates HIF-1α, thereby promoting pro-inflammatory polarization [113]. Similarly, in abdominal aortic aneurysms, H3K18 lactylation mediates GLI3 transcription, driving macrophage M1 polarization and amplifying the inflammatory response [114]. Moreover, lactate also promotes the secretion of damage-associated molecular patterns from macrophages, further enhancing inflammation [114]. In polymicrobial sepsis, intracellular lactate facilitates HMGB1 lactylation and acetylation. These modifications collectively drive exosomal HMGB1 secretion and increase endothelial permeability—key pathological features that exacerbate sepsis [73]. Taken together, lactylation serves as a fundamental and context-dependent mechanism that governs macrophage functional plasticity, influencing their polarization state and secretory profile across diverse cardiovascular and inflammatory diseases.
Angiogenesis is the process by which new blood vessels sprout from preexisting vasculature to meet increased demands for tissue perfusion and oxygen delivery [115]. In CVD, angiogenesis can be a double-edged sword: Neovascularization in ischemic myocardium may improve perfusion and support tissue repair, whereas intraplaque neovessels in atherosclerotic lesions can promote plaque vulnerability and increase the risk of hemorrhage [116,117]. Accumulating evidence indicates that lactylation constitutes an important regulatory layer of angiogenic signaling and thereby modulates disease progression (Fig. 3D). As the central pro-angiogenic cue, VEGF induces H3K9 lactylation in endothelial cells. This histone modification enriches the promoters of key angiogenic genes, such as TGFBR2, PRCP, and EGFR, thereby driving their transcriptional activation and promoting angiogenesis [118]. In the context of diabetic MI, the combined high-glucose and hypoxic microenvironment induce lactylation of IDH2 at Lys272 in endothelial cells, which enhances its binding to caveolin-1 (Cav1). This, in turn, relieves the constitutive inhibition of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) by Cav1, leading to increased eNOS activity and nitric oxide (NO) production, ultimately facilitating cardiac microvascular endothelial proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis [38].
Ocular neovascularization disorders, a leading cause of blindness, are also regulated by lactylation. In endothelial cells, HIF-1α lactylation has been reported to enhance VEGFA up-regulation, stimulating angiogenesis [119]. Furthermore, H3K18 lactylation up-regulates the RNA methyltransferase NSUN2, which enhances m5C methylation on AKAP2 mRNA, increasing its stability. This cascade ultimately activates the protein kinase A (PKA)–VEGFR2 signaling pathway in endothelial cells, thereby promoting the development of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) [120]. Within the pathological milieu of diabetic retinopathy (DR), H3K18la modulates the expression of the fat mass and obesity-associated protein (FTO); FTO, in turn, promotes angiogenesis by accelerating endothelial cell cycle progression and enhancing tip cell formation [121]. Additionally, Wang et al. [122] reported that hypoxia-induced lactylation of the transcription factor YY1 in microglia transcriptionally activates FGF2 expression, contributing to pathological retinal neovascularization. Adequate blood supply is crucial for tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis. Research indicates that lactylation also contributes to cancer progression by supporting angiogenesis and promoting vasculogenic mimicry (VM) [123,124]. Taken together, these findings underscore the multifaceted regulatory role of lactylation in angiogenesis—targeting key molecules such as histones (H3K9 and H3K18), HIF-1α, YY1, and IDH2—and its contribution to pathological processes including diabetic MI, ocular neovascularization disorders, and cancer progression.
In addition to the functions described above, lactylation participates in several other biological processes. For instance, Xing and colleagues [125] reported that the transcription factor Glis1 up-regulates glycolysis, thereby promoting H3K27 acetylation and H3K18 lactylation; these epigenetic modifications activate the pluripotency-associated genes OCT4 and SALL4 and facilitate somatic cell reprogramming. In a separate study, Dai et al. [126] demonstrated that lactate enhances myogenesis through p300-dependent H3K9la, a modification that stimulates NEU2 transcription to promote myoblast differentiation and muscle regeneration. In addition, Chen et al. [127] identified lactylation as a critical regulator of homologous recombination (HR) repair: Following DNA damage, the CBP acetyltransferase catalyzes K673 lactylation of MRE11, a core subunit of the MRN complex. This modification enhances the DNA-binding affinity of MRE11 and accelerates DNA end resection, thereby promoting HR. Collectively, these findings broaden the functional landscape of lactylation, positioning it as a versatile regulator of cell fate decisions, tissue regeneration, and genome maintenance.
Within the pathophysiology of cardiovascular disorders, lactylation has been identified as an important epigenetic regulatory mechanism. Accumulating studies have identified a panel of CVD-associated lactylation events on both histone and nonhistone proteins, providing an evidence base for disease relevance (Table 1). The mechanistic pathways through which these modifications operate, together with their functional consequences across distinct cardiovascular conditions, are delineated in the following subsections (Fig. 4).
Atherosclerosis is a major risk factor underlying the development and progression of CVDs, characterized fundamentally as a lipid metabolism-driven chronic inflammatory disorder. Endothelial cells, VSMCs, and macrophages are widely recognized as key cellular players driving disease initiation, progression, and plaque stability. Recent studies have revealed that lactylation serves as a crucial epigenetic regulator in atherosclerosis, modulating these cell populations through distinct pathways (Fig. 4A).
In endothelial cells, current evidence indicates that p300-mediated histone lactylation at 2 specific sites plays an essential role in promoting atherosclerosis. H3K18 lactylation promotes EndoMT through transcriptional activation of Snail1, thereby exacerbating endothelial dysfunction and ECM remodeling [57]. Meanwhile, H3K9 lactylation transcriptionally activates stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 (SCD1), promoting a pro-inflammatory endothelial dysfunction characterized by impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation, up-regulation of adhesion molecules, and increased monocyte adhesion [62]. In VSMCs, 2 distinct lactylation-dependent pathways contribute to atherosclerosis. First, Sox10 lactylation promotes macrophage-like transdifferentiation and pyroptosis, thereby intensifying vascular inflammation and neointimal hyperplasia [80]. Second, TRAP1-mediated metabolic reprogramming induces a glycolytic shift, increasing lactate production, which in turn induces H4K12la through HDAC3 down-regulation [63]. Binding of H4K12la to promoters of senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) genes accelerates cellular senescence and plaque formation.
By contrast, in macrophages, lactylation can be linked to repair-oriented programs and plaque stabilization. Inhibition of MCT4 enhances p300-mediated H3K18la, which up-regulates reparative and TCA cycle-related genes, thereby promoting M2 polarization and supporting plaque stabilization [128]. Furthermore, Chen et al. [112] demonstrated that exercise serves as a key trigger for lactylation-mediated regulation in atherosclerosis, conferring cardioprotective effects. Mechanistically, exercise-induced Mecp2 lactylation at Lys271 (Mecp2 K271la) in macrophages interacts with H3K36me3 to repress RUNX1 transcription, thereby driving M2 polarization and contributing to plaque stabilization. In addition, exercise promotes Mecp2 K271la in endothelial cells, which attenuates atherogenesis by inhibiting the Ereg/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling axis. Consequently, pro-inflammatory molecules (IL-1β, IL-6, and VCAM-1) are down-regulated, whereas eNOS is up-regulated [129].
Overall, lactylation exerts dual effects in atherosclerosis, influencing disease progression through diverse mechanisms in these key cellular players. Within this “accelerator–brake” framework, lactylation in endothelial cells and VSMCs predominantly accelerates pro-sclerotic, pro-inflammatory, and EndoMT/VSMC-transdifferentiation programs, whereas MeCP2- and H3K18-centered lactylation in macrophages can function as a brake by promoting reparative M2 polarization and plaque stabilization. These cell type-specific and directionally opposing effects underscore the therapeutic potential of modulating lactylation to restore vascular homeostasis in atherosclerosis.
MI, a leading cause of mortality worldwide, results from the accumulation of coronary plaques that severely restrict coronary blood flow and induce profound hypoxia. Timely coronary reperfusion remains the standard of care for MI; however, it can paradoxically precipitate myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury (MIRI), thereby amplifying cardiac damage [130]. Cardiac ischemia induces profound metabolic remodeling: Hypoxia impairs mitochondrial OXPHOS, resulting in ATP depletion that fails to meet myocardial energy demands. Consequently, metabolic reprogramming increases glycolytic flux as the principal ATP-generating pathway, causing marked lactate accumulation in ischemic myocardial tissue [131]. High lactate concentrations are strongly associated with worse clinical outcomes and increased mortality in patients with MI. At the molecular level, lactylation functions as a key regulatory link between ischemia-driven lactate accumulation and downstream cardiac injury responses (Fig. 4B).
In maladaptive remodeling, the post-MI surge in lactate induces Snail1 lactylation, thereby promoting EndoMT, aggravating cardiac fibrosis, and impairing cardiac function [78]. In cardiomyocytes, I/R-induced histone H3K18 lactylation up-regulates YTHDF2, which in turn promotes apoptosis via Ras guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase)-activating protein-binding protein 1 (G3BP1), thereby exacerbating post-ischemic remodeling [58]. Simultaneously, MDH2 lactylation impairs mitochondrial function and drives iron-dependent lipid peroxidation, thereby depleting glutathione (GSH), inactivating glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4), and ultimately inducing ferroptosis in cardiomyocytes [64]. Importantly, S100a9 lactylation at Lys26 (S100a9 K26la) in neutrophils can further amplify injury. Mechanistically, S100a9K26la translocates to the nucleus and acts as a co-activator at promoters of migration-related genes, promoting neutrophil trafficking and recruitment to ischemic myocardium; moreover, during neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation, lactylated S100a9 can be released locally and induce cardiomyocyte death through mitochondrial dysfunction [37].
Recent studies exploring the cardioprotective effects of protein lactylation have highlighted its context-dependent roles in the pathophysiology of MI and MIRI. In the early phase of MI, endogenous glycolytic reprogramming coupled with lactate import via MCT1 enhances histone lactylation within bone marrow and circulating monocytes [52]. Specifically, H3K18la facilitates transcription of reparative genes such as LRG1, VEGFA, and IL-10, thereby establishing a pro-reparative microenvironment that improves cardiac function following MI/MIRI [52]. In cardiomyocytes, Yu et al. [132] reported that HSPA12A is crucial for improving cardiomyocyte survival during I/R by maintaining aerobic glycolytic homeostasis and sustaining H3K56 lactylation. Additionally, fibroblasts stimulated by I/R secrete lactylated Serpina3k (SA3K), which limits cardiomyocyte apoptosis through paracrine mechanisms. SA3K lactylation at Lys351 (SA3K K351la) inhibits Wnt signaling while activating 2 principal pro-survival cascades: (a) the RISK (reperfusion injury salvage kinase) pathway through phosphorylation of AKT and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK1/2), and (b) the SAFE (survivor activating factor enhancement) pathway via Janus kinase 2 (JAK2)–signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) signaling [70].
Collectively, these findings demonstrate that lactylation exerts spatiotemporally distinct and often opposing roles in MI and MIRI. On the one hand, it can act as an accelerator of injury by driving maladaptive processes such as EndoMT, cardiomyocyte apoptosis, and ferroptosis, thereby exacerbating tissue damage and adverse remodeling. On the other hand, lactylation in monocytes, macrophages, and fibroblasts forms a compensatory brake that supports angiogenesis, resolution of inflammation, and tissue repair. This dual regulatory network underscores the context-dependent nature of lactylation in cardiac pathophysiology. Therapeutic modulation of protein lactylation may therefore represent a promising strategy for alleviating ischemic myocardial injury and promoting cardiac repair.
As a complex clinical syndrome, heart failure arises from structural and/or functional abnormalities of the myocardium that impair ventricular performance, resulting in insufficient cardiac output and/or elevated intracardiac pressures [133]. These pathophysiological changes lead to systemic or pulmonary congestion and end-organ hypoperfusion. Analogous to MI, the failing heart undergoes metabolic reprogramming, characterized by increased glycolysis and reduced fatty acid oxidation [95]. Elevated blood lactate concentrations serve as a robust prognostic marker, predicting worse clinical outcomes and a higher incidence of adverse cardiovascular events [134]. In cardiomyocytes, lactate contributes to pathological cardiac hypertrophy through histone lactylation, particularly H3K18la [135] (Fig. 4C). H3K18la up-regulates TGF-β2 expression and activates the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase ((PI3K)/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway, thereby promoting pressure overload-induced pathological myocardial hypertrophy [59]. Moreover, H3K18la interacts with the transcription factor GATA4 to enhance its transcriptional activity, which in turn activates the expression of hypertrophy-related genes (such as ANP, BNP, and β-MHC) and ultimately accelerates heart failure progression [136]. However, in advanced heart failure, up-regulation of MCT4 and enhanced lactate efflux are prominent [137]. Under this condition, maintaining histone lactylation has been shown to attenuate disease progression and improve cardiac function [138]. Additionally, Zhang et al. [66] demonstrated that loss of lactylation at the K1897 site of α-MHC impairs its binding to titin, leading to deterioration of cardiac structure and function.
Collectively, these findings suggest a context-dependent duality of lactylation in heart failure. While early-stage histone lactylation appears to drive pathological hypertrophy and disease progression, the preservation of lactylation at later stages, including on α-MHC, may exert protective effects on sarcomeric integrity and cardiac function. This temporal shift implies that lactylation functions not as a simple “accelerator” or “brake”, but as a dynamic modifier whose role depends on the cellular metabolic milieu and disease phase. Importantly, the regulatory capacity of lactylation highlights its potential as a therapeutic target; modulating specific lactylation sites or levels could offer novel strategies to decelerate maladaptive remodeling and improve cardiac outcomes in heart failure.
Cardiovascular calcification is a common pathological feature affecting both heart valves and arteries, typically initiating insidiously and progressing over time, particularly in aging populations and chronic disease states. Calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD), a prototypical form of valvular calcification, is characterized by progressive valve tissue thickening, sclerosis, and the formation of calcified nodules, which collectively culminate in valvular stenosis and a spectrum of clinical sequelae, including coronary insufficiency, dyspnea, and angina [139,140]. By contrast, arterial calcification involves abnormal calcium deposition within the arterial wall, a process that impairs vascular compliance and elasticity and shows strong associations with multiple cardiovascular disorders [141,142]. Recent studies have begun to elucidate the role of lactylation in regulating these calcification processes, as summarized below (Fig. 4D). In the context of aortic valve calcification, lumican—an ECM component—has been identified as a key contributor to CAVD pathogenesis by promoting histone H3 lactylation [143]. Mechanistically, lumican activates inflammatory responses and enhances glycolysis in valve interstitial cells (VICs), leading to substantial lactate accumulation. The resulting lactate subsequently induces site-specific H3Kla, particularly at the H3K14 and H3K9 residues; this epigenetic modification up-regulates the transcription of calcification-related genes, including RUNX2 and BMP2, thereby accelerating valvular calcification. Moreover, andrographolide (AGP) has been shown to attenuate CAVD progression by simultaneously modulating glycolytic pathways and inhibiting p300-mediated H3Kla, highlighting a potential therapeutic strategy for mitigating valvular calcification [144]. With respect to arterial calcification, Ma et al. [60] were the first to report that the orphan nuclear receptor NR4A3 is up-regulated in calcified arterial tissues. Subsequent investigations further demonstrated that NR4A3 directly binds to the promoters of glycolytic genes, thereby augmenting lactate production in VSMCs. The increased lactate levels in turn drive histone lactylation—most notably H3K18la—which promotes arterial medial calcification by activating Phospho1 expression [60]. Furthermore, microenvironmental lactate accumulation exacerbates VSMC calcification through H3K18la-mediated up-regulation of CHI3L1, which activates the IL-13/IL-13Rα2/JAK1/STAT3 signaling cascade and thereby aggravates diabetes-related arterial calcification [145]. Collectively, these findings highlight lactylation—positioned at the interface of glycolytic metabolism and histone modification—as a central regulator of both valvular and arterial calcification and point to lactylation-related pathways as promising therapeutic targets for prevalent CVDs.
AAD are highly lethal cardiovascular emergencies with limited pharmacologic options beyond surgical/interventional repair, and disease progression is tightly linked to VSMC phenotypic switching from a contractile to a synthetic state [146]. Growing evidence indicates that this switch is accompanied by metabolic reprogramming resulting in lactate accumulation and mitochondrial dysfunction in the aortic wall. Accumulating evidence further underscores the regulatory role of protein lactylation in AAD pathogenesis (Fig. 4E). In AAD, studies have reported down-regulated expression of the E3 ubiquitin ligase March2 in VSMCs. Further investigation reveals that March2 deficiency impairs PKM2 polymerization, thereby promoting glycolysis and enhancing H3K18 lactylation, which drives p53-dependent apoptosis of VSMCs [61]. In parallel, lactylation marks have been implicated in reinforcing the phenotypic switch: Elevated H4K16 lactylation has been linked to increased transcription of PDK1, which further biases cellular metabolism toward glycolysis, forming a positive feedback loop that sustains metabolic reprogramming [97]. Moreover, ATP5F1A lactylation in VSMCs further exacerbates mitochondrial dysfunction [65]. These metabolic alterations drive the phenotypic switching of VSMCs toward a matrix-degrading synthetic state, thereby promoting pathological vascular remodeling and AAD progression [65].
Alongside the diseases discussed earlier, lactylation has also been linked to hypoxic pulmonary hypertension and radiation-induced cardiac injury (Fig. 4F). In hypoxic pulmonary hypertension, the mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (mROS)/HIF-1α/PDK1/2 axis induces glycolytic reprogramming, promoting lactate accumulation and histone lactylation at proliferation-related genes and leading to hyperplasia of pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells (PASMCs) [147]. Radiation-induced cardiac injury is associated with Lys311 lactylation of protein disulfide-isomerase (P4HB). This modification promotes the interaction of P4HB with PTGS2, thereby enhancing SH3GLB1-mediated mitochondrial ROS (mitoROS)-driven mitophagy, which can be inhibited by aloe emodin through site-specific blockade of P4HB K311 lactylation [67].
Therapeutic targeting of lactylation in CVDs can be conceptualized within a 3-ring metabolic–epigenetic framework along the lactate–lactylation axis. In this framework, the outer ring focuses on modulating lactate transport, primarily through monocarboxylate transporters such as MCT1 and MCT4; the middle ring targets lactate production by glycolytic enzymes, including LDHA and PKM2; and the inner ring directly modulates lactylation-modifying enzymes, including writers and erasers such as p300/CBP, other HATs, HDACs, and sirtuins. These concentric layers represent progressively more proximal interventions on the lactylation machinery and collectively define a translational roadmap for small-molecule and combination therapies in CVDs. Accumulating evidence indicates that a variety of small molecules and approved pharmaceuticals can effectively regulate intracellular lactate and lactylation levels (Table 2), with their mechanisms largely corresponding to these 3 rings.
Interventions targeting MCT1 and MCT4 constitute the outer ring of this framework. As key mediators of lactate transport in vivo, MCTs are critical for maintaining intracellular and extracellular lactate equilibrium. In angiotensin II (Ang II)-induced models of hypertensive cardiac remodeling, a distinct intercellular lactate exchange mechanism operates: Cardiac fibroblasts predominantly export lactate through MCT4, whereas cardiomyocytes take it up via MCT1 [148]. This lactate shuttle markedly up-regulates the expression of genes associated with cardiomyocyte hypertrophy (e.g., ANP, BNP, and MYH7) and accelerates the progression of pathological cardiac remodeling. Accordingly, cardiomyocyte-specific deletion of MCT1 attenuates Ang II-induced cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis by impairing lactate uptake [148]. Moreover, the selective MCT4 inhibitor VB124 mitigates cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and improves cardiac remodeling by inhibiting lactate export and rebalancing the pyruvate–lactate axis toward mitochondrial pyruvate oxidation [149]. Consistently, inhibiting lactate efflux in cardiomyocytes elevates intracellular lactate and restores α-MHC K1897 lactylation, thereby preserving sarcomeric integrity and alleviating heart failure progression [66]. Collectively, these findings underscore the therapeutic potential of MCT inhibitors as promising targets for CVDs.
As the middle ring of the framework, this strategy focuses on limiting the generation of the lactate pool that fuels protein lactylation. In practice, this strategy is primarily achieved by inhibiting key glycolytic enzymes, particularly LDHA. Evidence for this relationship is derived from cerebral I/R injury models [150]. In N2a cells undergoing oxygen–glucose deprivation/reoxygenation, silencing LDHA with small interfering RNA (siRNA) reduces lactate production, leading to decreased H3K18la levels and attenuated HMGB1-mediated pyroptosis. Conversely, exogenous lactate supplementation restores histone lactylation in these cells, thereby confirming the causal link between LDHA-derived lactate and this epigenetic modification [150]. Similarly, in cardiac models, hypoxia/reoxygenation up-regulates LDHA in H9c2 cells, increasing lactate and global lactylation [151]. In this context, LDHA silencing reduces lactate, diminishes NLRP3 K245 lactylation, inhibits pyroptosis, and mitigates myocardial injury. In addition, pharmacological inhibition of LDH with oxamate or the specific LDHA inhibitor GNE-140 also reduces intracellular lactate, suppresses H3K18 lactylation, and alleviates cardiomyocyte hypertrophy [135]. Together, LDHA acts as a central mediator of lactate-driven metabolic reprogramming, thereby presenting a novel therapeutic avenue for the treatment of CVDs.
The inner ring provides the most proximal control by directly modulating lactylation-modifying enzymes, offering a powerful lever to rewire lactate-responsive gene programs. As previously established, lactylation is dynamically regulated by lactyltransferase “writers” and deacetylase “erasers”. The p300/CBP family are key lactyltransferases; their silencing or pharmacological inhibition (e.g., with C646) markedly diminishes lactylation in macrophages [73,89]. In vitro, AGP suppresses aortic valve calcification by disrupting p300-mediated H3K9 and H3K14 lactylation, thereby inhibiting RUNX2 expression and osteogenic differentiation in VICs [144]. HDAC1 to HDAC3 function as efficient erasers of lactylation. The HDAC agonist ITSA-1 potently inhibits Ras-induced H4K12 lactylation and senescence in VSMCs, producing effects comparable to those observed with HDAC3 overexpression [63]. Conversely, HDAC3 down-regulation enhances myocardial lactylation, alleviating cardiac remodeling and improving cardiac function [138]. Collectively, these findings identify p300/CBP and HDACs as tractable targets for cardiovascular therapy via modulation of lactylation, underscoring their substantial translational potential.
The 3-ring metabolic–epigenetic framework provides a practical translational roadmap. However, the feasibility of lactylation-targeted therapies for CVDs depends on several critical factors that must be addressed to ensure successful clinical translation. First, the biological effects of lactylation are highly cell-type specific and stage dependent, meaning it can function as an “accelerator” or a “brake” depending on where and when it occurs. Even within the same disease, lactylation in endothelial cells, VSMCs, or immune cells (e.g., macrophages) may engage distinct transcriptional programs and thus either confer protection or exacerbate pathology; as the disease advances, its net effect may also switch direction. Accordingly, lactylation-targeted therapies should be tailored to both the cellular source and the disease stage, with consideration of temporally staged interventions that exploit appropriate therapeutic windows and dosing strategies. Second, targeted delivery to the heart and vasculature is paramount, as lactate transporters and lactylation-related enzymes are expressed in a variety of tissues, including muscle and brain [19]. Systemic inhibition may cause unwanted metabolic consequences, so novel drug delivery systems, such as nanoparticles or receptor-mediated targeting, will be essential to restrict the therapeutic effects to the heart and blood vessels [152]. Third, the development of pharmacodynamic biomarkers will be critical for monitoring the efficacy and safety of lactylation-targeted therapies. Site-specific biomarkers, such as lactylation on histones and nonhistone proteins, as well as transcriptional signatures, could provide real-time insights into target engagement and therapeutic responses [153]. Finally, safety considerations are paramount, as many cardiovascular patients are on long-term therapies for other conditions, such as hypertension or dyslipidemia. The potential for drug–drug interactions, especially with other epigenetic modulators or metabolic regulators, must be carefully assessed [154]. Translational success will depend on addressing these feasibility concerns, including optimizing patient selection, developing safe and effective delivery methods, and establishing reliable biomarkers to guide therapy.
As a recently identified PTM derived from lactate, lactylation has become a pivotal molecular link between metabolic reprogramming and epigenetic regulation. Accumulating evidence demonstrates that lactylation participates in a wide array of cellular processes, including inflammation, fibrosis, angiogenesis, and metabolism, many of which are central to the pathogenesis of CVDs [155]. In this regard, this review comprehensively and systematically summarizes recent advances in lactylation and highlights the multifaceted roles of protein lactylation in major CVDs, thereby supporting its promise as a disease biomarker and a potential therapeutic target (Fig. 5).
Despite these advances, several critical issues remain unresolved. First, although most current research focuses on l-lactylation, the specific contributions of d-lactylation to disease-related phenotypes remain incompletely understood. Second, at the chromatin level, crosstalk between lactylation and other acylations (acetylation, crotonylation, β-hydroxybutyrylation, succinylation), as well as with DNA/RNA methylation, remains largely correlative. Third, the mechanisms by which metabolic states and lactate concentrations dictate the functional consequences of lactylation within the same cell type remain unclear. Additionally, conceptualizing lactylation as a context-dependent “accelerator and brake” in cardiovascular pathology provides a useful framework for designing precision interventions. By integrating strategies that modulate lactate availability with agents that selectively target lactylation writers, readers, and erasers, it may be possible to develop a new generation of metabolism–epigenetics combination therapies for the prevention and treatment of CVDs. However, challenges related to tissue specificity, potential off-target effects, and the complexity of lactate signaling networks must be carefully addressed.
In the cardiovascular field, lactylation has emerged as a novel yet pivotal focus of research at the interface of metabolism and gene regulation. Elucidating its molecular mechanisms and intermolecular interactions provides a fundamental basis for further investigation in this area. Such a foundation is indispensable for the development of future interventions that target the lactylation pathway. Furthermore, this foundation will facilitate the rigorous assessment of the efficacy and safety of newly developed interventions in preclinical and clinical settings. Therefore, advancing our understanding of lactylation is a crucial prerequisite for the rational design of precise and personalized treatments for CVDs.
1.
Li J, Ma P, Liu Z, Xie J. L- and D-lactate: Unveiling their hidden functions in disease and health. Cell Commun Signal. 2025;23(1):134.
2.
Li X, Yang Y, Zhang B, Lin X, Fu X, An Y, Zou Y, Wang J-X, Wang Z, Yu T. Lactate metabolism in human health and disease. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022;7(1):305.
3.
Jing F, Zhang J, Zhang H, Li T. Unlocking the multifaceted molecular functions and diverse disease implications of lactylation. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2025;100(1):172–189.
4.
Zhang D, Tang Z, Huang H, Zhou G, Cui C, Weng Y, Liu W, Kim S, Lee S, Perez-Neut M, et al.Metabolic regulation of gene expression by histone lactylation. Nature. 2019;574(7779):575–580.
5.
Ren H, Tang Y, Zhang D. The emerging role of protein L-lactylation in metabolic regulation and cell signalling. Nat Metab. 2025;7(4):647–664.
6.
Ouyang J, Wang H, Huang J. The role of lactate in cardiovascular diseases. Cell Commun Signal. 2023;21(1):317.
7.
Zhu W, Guo S, Sun J, Zhao Y, Liu C. Lactate and lactylation in cardiovascular diseases: Current progress and future perspectives. Metabolism. 2024;158:Article 155957.
8.
Zhang D, Gao J, Zhu Z, Mao Q, Xu Z, Singh PK, Rimayi CC, Moreno-Yruela C, Xu S, Li G, et al.Lysine L-lactylation is the dominant lactylation isomer induced by glycolysis. Nat Chem Biol. 2025;21(1):91–99.
9.
Gao J, Liu R, Huang K, Li Z, Sheng X, Chakraborty K, Han C, Zhang D, Becker L, Zhao Y. Dynamic investigation of hypoxia-induced L-lactylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2025;122(10):Article e2404899122.
10.
Gaffney DO, Jennings EQ, Anderson CC, Marentette JO, Shi T, Schou Oxvig A-M, Streeter MD, Johannsen M, Spiegel DA, Chapman E, et al.Non-enzymatic lysine lactoylation of glycolytic enzymes. Cell Chem Biol. 2020;27(2):206–213.e6.
11.
Rabinowitz JD, Enerbäck S. Lactate: The ugly duckling of energy metabolism. Nat Metab. 2020;2(7):566–571.
12.
Yao S, Chai H, Tao T, Zhang L, Yang X, Li X, Yi Z, Wang Y, An J, Wen G, et al.Role of lactate and lactate metabolism in liver diseases (Review). Int J Mol Med. 2024;54(1):59.
13.
Magistretti PJ, Allaman I. Lactate in the brain: From metabolic end-product to signalling molecule. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018;19(4):235–249.
14.
Warburg O, Wind F, Negelein E. The metabolism of tumors in the body. J Gen Physiol. 1927;8(6):519–530.
15.
Oseguera M, Yau AA. Lactic acidosis in a patient with cancer. Clin Med. 2023;23(6):615–617.
16.
Hui S, Ghergurovich JM, Morscher RJ, Jang C, Teng X, Lu W, Esparza LA, Reya T, Le Z, Yanxiang Guo J, et al.Glucose feeds the TCA cycle via circulating lactate. Nature. 2017;551(7678):115–118.
17.
Kraut JA, Madias NE. Lactic acidosis. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(24):2309–2319.
18.
Garcia CK, Goldstein JL, Pathak RK, Anderson RG, Brown MS. Molecular characterization of a membrane transporter for lactate, pyruvate, and other monocarboxylates: Implications for the Cori cycle. Cell. 1994;76(5):865–873.
19.
Halestrap AP. The SLC16 gene family—Structure, role and regulation in health and disease. Mol Asp Med. 2013;34(2-3):337–349.
20.
Halestrap AP, Wilson MC. The monocarboxylate transporter family—Role and regulation. IUBMB Life. 2012;64(2):109–119.
21.
Carneiro L, Pellerin L. Monocarboxylate transporters: New players in body weight regulation. Obes Rev. 2015;16(Suppl. 1):55–66.
22.
Payen VL, Mina E, Van Hée VF, Porporato PE, Sonveaux P. Monocarboxylate transporters in cancer. Mol Metab. 2020;33:48–66.
23.
Juel C. Lactate-proton cotransport in skeletal muscle. Physiol Rev. 1997;77(2):321–358.
24.
Brooks GA. The science and translation of lactate shuttle theory. Cell Metab. 2018;27(4):757–785.
25.
Suzuki A, Stern SA, Bozdagi O, Huntley GW, Walker RH, Magistretti PJ, Alberini CM. Astrocyte-neuron lactate transport is required for long-term memory formation. Cell. 2011;144(5):810–823.
26.
Bosshart PD, Charles R-P, Garibsingh R-AA, Schlessinger A, Fotiadis D. SLC16 family: From atomic structure to human disease. Trends Biochem Sci. 2021;46(1):28–40.
27.
Ganapathy V, Thangaraju M, Gopal E, Martin PM, Itagaki S, Miyauchi S, Prasad PD. Sodium-coupled monocarboxylate transporters in normal tissues and in cancer. AAPS J. 2008;10(1):193–199.
28.
Zhu R, Ye X, Lu X, Xiao L, Yuan M, Zhao H, Guo D, Meng Y, Han H, Luo S, et al.ACSS2 acts as a lactyl-CoA synthetase and couples KAT2A to function as a lactyltransferase for histone lactylation and tumor immune evasion. Cell Metab. 2025;37(2):361–376.e7.
29.
Liu R, Ren X, Park YE, Feng H, Sheng X, Song X, AminiTabrizi R, Shah H, Li L, Zhang Y, et al.Nuclear GTPSCS functions as a lactyl-CoA synthetase to promote histone lactylation and gliomagenesis. Cell Metab. 2025;37(2):377–394.e9.
30.
Hao B, Chen K, Zhai L, Liu M, Liu B, Tan M. Substrate and functional diversity of protein lysine post-translational modifications. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2024;22(1):Article qzae019.
31.
Minami E, Sasa K, Yamada A, Kawai R, Yoshida H, Nakano H, Maki K, Kamijo R. Lactate-induced histone lactylation by p300 promotes osteoblast differentiation. PLOS ONE. 2023;18(12):Article e0293676.
32.
Zheng B, Pan Y, Qian F, Liu D, Ye D, Yu B, Zhong S, Zheng W, Wang X, Zhou B, et al.High sugar induced RCC2 lactylation drives breast cancer tumorigenicity through upregulating MAD2L1. Adv Sci. 2025;12(21):Article e2415530.
33.
Chen J, He J, Wang X, Bai L, Yang X, Chen J, He Y, Chen K. Glis1 inhibits RTEC cellular senescence and renal fibrosis by downregulating histone lactylation in DKD. Life Sci. 2024;361:Article 123293.
34.
Niu Z, Chen C, Wang S, Lu C, Wu Z, Wang A, Mo J, Zhang J, Han Y, Yuan Y, et al.HBO1 catalyzes lysine lactylation and mediates histone H3K9la to regulate gene transcription. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):3561.
35.
Zou Y, Cao M, Tai M, Zhou H, Tao L, Wu S, Yang K, Zhang Y, Ge Y, Wang H, et al.A feedback loop driven by H4K12 lactylation and HDAC3 in macrophages regulates lactate-induced collagen synthesis in fibroblasts via the TGF-β signaling. Adv Sci. 2025;12(13):Article e2411408.
36.
Li W, Zhou J, Gu Y, Chen Y, Huang Y, Yang J, Zhu X, Zhao K, Yan Q, Zhao Z, et al.Lactylation of RNA m6A demethylase ALKBH5 promotes innate immune response to DNA herpesviruses and mpox virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2024;121(43):Article e2409132121.
37.
Wang X, Yan X, Mang G, Chen Y, Liu S, Sui J, Tong Z, Wang P, Cui J, Yang Q, et al.S100a9 lactylation triggers neutrophil trafficking and cardiac inflammation in myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. J Clin Invest. 2025;135(24):Article e194664.
38.
Zang G, Xu S, Sun Z, Zhang L, Qian Y, Yao H, Li L, Wang Z. IDH2 lactylation promotes angiogenesis in murine diabetic myocardial infarction via blocking Cav1-eNOS interaction. Nat Commun. 2025;17(1):1117.
39.
Li H, Liu C, Li R, Zhou L, Ran Y, Yang Q, Huang H, Lu H, Song H, Yang B, et al.AARS1 and AARS2 sense L-lactate to regulate cGAS as global lysine lactyltransferases. Nature. 2024;634(8036):1229–1237.
40.
Hu X, Huang X, Yang Y, Sun Y, Zhao Y, Zhang Z, Qiu D, Wu Y, Wu G, Lei L. Dux activates metabolism-lactylation-MET network during early iPSC reprogramming with Brg1 as the histone lactylation reader. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024;52(10):5529–5548.
41.
Zhai G, Niu Z, Jiang Z, Zhao F, Wang S, Chen C, Zheng W, Wang A, Zang Y, Han Y, et al.DPF2 reads histone lactylation to drive transcription and tumorigenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2024;121(50):Article e2421496121.
42.
Moreno-Yruela C, Zhang D, Wei W, Bæk M, Liu W, Gao J, Danková D, Nielsen AL, Bolding JE, Yang L, et al.Class I histone deacetylases (HDAC1-3) are histone lysine delactylases. Sci Adv. 2022;8(3):Article eabi6696.
43.
Zhou J, Qiu S, Yang X, Wu Y, Yao X, Hu H, Luo J, Wijaya CS, Ma L, Long X, et al.Hypoxia-induced PRMT1 lactylation drives vimentin arginine asymmetric dimethylation in tumor metastasis. Adv Sci. 2025;12(41):Article e09861.
44.
Du R, Gao Y, Yan C, Ren X, Qi S, Liu G, Guo X, Song X, Wang H, Rao J, et al.Sirtuin 1/sirtuin 3 are robust lysine delactylases and sirtuin 1-mediated delactylation regulates glycolysis. iScience. 2024;27(10):Article 110911.
45.
Sun L, Zhang Y, Yang B, Sun S, Zhang P, Luo Z, Feng T, Cui Z, Zhu T, Li Y, et al.Lactylation of METTL16 promotes cuproptosis via m6A-modification on FDX1 mRNA in gastric cancer. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):6523.
46.
Nickel GA, Pederson NJ, Faheem, Yang Z, Bulf J, Diehl KL. Sirtuin 6 is a histone delactylase. J Biol Chem. 2025;301(12):Article 110795.
47.
Liu R, Wu J, Guo H, Yao W, Li S, Lu Y, Jia Y, Liang X, Tang J, Zhang H. Post-translational modifications of histones: Mechanisms, biological functions, and therapeutic targets. MedComm (2020). 2023;4(3):Article e292.
48.
Hagihara H, Shoji H, Otabi H, Toyoda A, Katoh K, Namihira M, Miyakawa T. Protein lactylation induced by neural excitation. Cell Rep. 2021;37(2):Article 109820.
49.
Yin X, Li M, Wang Y, Zhao G, Yang T, Zhang Y, Guo J, Meng T, Du R, Li H, et al.Herbal medicine formula Huazhuo Tiaozhi granule ameliorates dyslipidaemia via regulating histone lactylation and miR-155-5p biogenesis. Clin Epigenetics. 2023;15(1):175.
50.
Xie Y, Hu H, Liu M, Zhou T, Cheng X, Huang W, Cao L. The role and mechanism of histone lactylation in health and diseases. Front Genet. 2022;13:Article 949252.
51.
Galle E, Wong CW, Ghosh A, Desgeorges T, Melrose K, Hinte LC, Castellano-Castillo D, Engl M, de Sousa JA, Ruiz-Ojeda FJ, et al.H3K18 lactylation marks tissue-specific active enhancers. Genome Biol. 2022;23(1):207.
52.
Wang N, Wang W, Wang X, Mang G, Chen J, Yan X, Tong Z, Yang Q, Wang M, Chen L, et al.Histone lactylation boosts reparative gene activation post-myocardial infarction. Circ Res. 2022;131(11):893–908.
53.
Zhao Y, Zhang M, Huang X, Liu J, Sun Y, Zhang F, Zhang N, Lei L. Lactate modulates zygotic genome activation through H3K18 lactylation rather than H3K27 acetylation. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2024;81(1):298.
54.
Li J, Hou W, Zhao Q, Han W, Cui H, Xiao S, Zhu L, Qu J, Liu X, Cong W, et al.Lactate regulates major zygotic genome activation by H3K18 lactylation in mammals. Natl Sci Rev. 2024;11(2):Article nwad295.
55.
Zhang C, Zhou L, Zhang M, Du Y, Li C, Ren H, Zheng L. H3K18 Lactylation potentiates immune escape of non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res. 2024;84(21):3589–3601.
56.
Zhao Y, Jiang J, Zhou P, Deng K, Liu Z, Yang M, Yang X, Li J, Li R, Xia J. H3K18 lactylation-mediated VCAM1 expression promotes gastric cancer progression and metastasis via AKT-mTOR-CXCL1 axis. Biochem Pharmacol. 2024;222:Article 116120.
57.
Dong M, Zhang Y, Chen M, Tan Y, Min J, He X, Liu F, Gu J, Jiang H, Zheng L, et al.ASF1A-dependent P300-mediated histone H3 lysine 18 lactylation promotes atherosclerosis by regulating EndMT. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2024;14(7):3027–3048.
58.
Xu GE, Yu P, Hu Y, Wan W, Shen K, Cui X, Wang J, Wang T, Cui C, Chatterjee E, et al.Exercise training decreases lactylation and prevents myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury by inhibiting YTHDF2. Basic Res Cardiol. 2024;119(4):651–671.
59.
Chen M, Wang Z, Li J, Teng P, Wei Y, Li W, Cui Y, Ma L, Xu H. Histone lactylation promotes pressure overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure by regulating TGFB2 expression. Circ Res. 2025;138(2):Article e326185.
60.
Ma W, Jia K, Cheng H, Xu H, Li Z, Zhang H, Xie H, Sun H, Yi L, Chen Z, et al.Orphan nuclear receptor NR4A3 promotes vascular calcification via histone Lactylation. Circ Res. 2024;134(11):1427–1447.
61.
Li YE, Liu S, Wang L, Du Y, Wu L, Chen H, Zhu T, Lin J, Xiong S, Wang Y, et al.March2 alleviates aortic aneurysm/dissection by regulating PKM2 polymerization. Circ Res. 2025;136(8):e73–e93.
62.
Ma Y, Feng S, Jiang Y, Jiang J, Liu R, Ma Y, Yin X, Bian H, Zhu R. SLC22A6-dependent lactylation of H3K9 aggravates endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis. Metabolism. 2026;175:Article 156426.
63.
Li X, Chen M, Chen X, He X, Li X, Wei H, Tan Y, Min J, Azam T, Xue M, et al.TRAP1 drives smooth muscle cell senescence and promotes atherosclerosis via HDAC3-primed histone H4 lysine 12 lactylation. Eur Heart J. 2024;45(39):4219–4235.
64.
She H, Hu Y, Zhao G, Du Y, Wu Y, Chen W, Li Y, Wang Y, Tan L, Zhou Y, et al.Dexmedetomidine ameliorates myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury by inhibiting MDH2 lactylation via regulating metabolic reprogramming. Adv Sci. 2024;11(48):Article e2409499.
65.
Yu T, Li X, Wang C, Yang Y, Fu X, Li T, Wang W, Liu X, Jiang X, Wei D, et al.Lactylation of mitochondrial adenosine triphosphate synthase subunit alpha regulates vascular remodeling and progression of aortic dissection. Research. 2025;8:0799.
66.
Zhang N, Zhang Y, Xu J, Wang P, Wu B, Lu S, Lu X, You S, Huang X, Li M, et al.α-Myosin heavy chain lactylation maintains sarcomeric structure and function and alleviates the development of heart failure. Cell Res. 2023;33(9):679–698.
67.
Ouyang F, Li Y, Wang H, Liu X, Tan X, Xie G, Zeng J, Zeng G, Luo Q, Zhou H, et al.Aloe emodin alleviates radiation-induced heart disease via blocking P4HB lactylation and mitigating kynurenine metabolic disruption. Adv Sci. 2024;11(47):Article e2406026.
68.
Weng W, He Z, Ma Z, Huang J, Han Y, Feng Q, Qi W, Peng Y, Wang J, Gu J, et al.Tufm lactylation regulates neuronal apoptosis by modulating mitophagy in traumatic brain injury. Cell Death Differ. 2024;32(3):530–545.
69.
Li Q, Lin G, Zhang K, Liu X, Li Z, Bing X, Nie Z, Jin S, Guo J, Min X. Hypoxia exposure induces lactylation of Axin1 protein to promote glycolysis of esophageal carcinoma cells. Biochem Pharmacol. 2024;226:Article 116415.
70.
Wang L, Li D, Yao F, Feng S, Tong C, Rao R, Zhong M, Wang X, Feng W, Hu Z, et al.Serpina3k lactylation protects from cardiac ischemia reperfusion injury. Nat Commun. 2025;16(1):1012.
71.
Tian Q, Li J, Wu B, Pang Y, He W, Xiao Q, Wang J, Yi L, Tian N, Shi X, et al.APP lysine 612 lactylation ameliorates amyloid pathology and memory decline in Alzheimer’s disease. J Clin Invest. 2025;135(1):Article e184656.
72.
Hong H, Han H, Wang L, Cao W, Hu M, Li J, Wang J, Yang Y, Xu X, Li G, et al.ABCF1-K430-lactylation promotes HCC malignant progression via transcriptional activation of HIF1 signaling pathway. Cell Death Differ. 2025;32(4):613–631.
73.
Yang K, Fan M, Wang X, Xu J, Wang Y, Tu F, Gill PS, Ha T, Liu L, Williams DL, et al.Lactate promotes macrophage HMGB1 lactylation, acetylation, and exosomal release in polymicrobial sepsis. Cell Death Differ. 2022;29(1):133–146.
74.
Du S, Zhang X, Jia Y, Peng P, Kong Q, Jiang S, Li Y, Li C, Ding Z, Liu L. Hepatocyte HSPA12A inhibits macrophage chemotaxis and activation to attenuate liver ischemia/reperfusion injury via suppressing glycolysis-mediated HMGB1 lactylation and secretion of hepatocytes. Theranostics. 2023;13(11):3856–3871.
75.
Gong T, Wang Q-D, Loughran PA, Li YH, Scott MJ, Billiar TR, Liu Y-T, Fan J. Mechanism of lactic acidemia-promoted pulmonary endothelial cells death in sepsis: Role for CIRP-ZBP1-PANoptosis pathway. Mil Med Res. 2024;11(1):71.
76.
Li Y, Min X, Zhang X, Cao X, Kong Q, Mao Q, Cheng H, Gou L, Li Y, Li C, et al.HSPA12A promotes c-Myc lactylation-mediated proliferation of tubular epithelial cells to facilitate renal functional recovery from kidney ischemia/reperfusion injury. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2024;81(1):404.
77.
Huang J, Wang X, Li N, Fan W, Li X, Zhou Q, Liu J, Li W, Zhang Z, Liu X, et al.YY1 lactylation aggravates autoimmune uveitis by enhancing microglial functions via inflammatory genes. Adv Sci. 2024;11(19):Article e2308031.
78.
Fan M, Yang K, Wang X, Chen L, Gill PS, Ha T, Liu L, Lewis NH, Williams DL, Li C. Lactate promotes endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition via Snail1 lactylation after myocardial infarction. Sci Adv. 2023;9(5):eadc9465.
79.
Xu Y, Ma X, Ni W, Zheng L, Lin Z, Lai Y, Yang N, Dai Z, Yao T, Chen Z, et al.PKM2-driven lactate overproduction triggers endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition in ischemic flap via mediating TWIST1 lactylation. Adv Sci. 2024;11(47):Article e2406184.
80.
Xu X, Zhang DD, Kong P, Gao YK, Huang XF, Song Y, Zhang WD, Guo RJ, Li CL, Chen BW, et al.Sox10 escalates vascular inflammation by mediating vascular smooth muscle cell transdifferentiation and pyroptosis in neointimal hyperplasia. Cell Rep. 2023;42(8):Article 112869.
81.
Frangogiannis NG. Cardiac fibrosis. Cardiovasc Res. 2021;117(6):1450–1488.
82.
Frantz S, Hundertmark MJ, Schulz-Menger J, Bengel FM, Bauersachs J. Left ventricular remodelling post-myocardial infarction: Pathophysiology, imaging, and novel therapies. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(27):2549–2561.
83.
Liu Z, Liu W, Wei H, Ping Y, Yu Z, Dong Z, Ren J, Zhang S, Liu S. Elevated lactate production exacerbates PM2.5-induced pulmonary fibrosis by stabilizing TGF-β1. J Adv Res. 2025.
84.
Hu X, Chen W, Yang M, Li M, Li X, Ouyang S. IGFBP5 promotes EndoMT and renal fibrosis through H3K18 lactylation in diabetic nephropathy. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2025;82(1):215.
85.
Wang P, Xie D, Xiao T, Cheng C, Wang D, Sun J, Wu M, Yang Y, Zhang A, Liu Q. H3K18 lactylation promotes the progression of arsenite-related idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis via YTHDF1/m6A/NREP. J Hazard Mater. 2024;461:Article 132582.
86.
Liu C, Zhang Q, Zhou H, Jin L, Liu C, Yang M, Zhao X, Ding W, Xie W, Kong H. GLP-1R activation attenuates the progression of pulmonary fibrosis via disrupting NLRP3 inflammasome/PFKFB3-driven glycolysis interaction and histone lactylation. J Transl Med. 2024;22(1):954.
87.
Tang R, Qin S, Xu Q, Lin W, Zhang S, Peng Y, Feng J, Xing S, Gao Y, Mei S, et al.Lipopolysaccharide-induced histone lactylation mediates m6A RNA modification causing mitochondrial dysfunction and pulmonary fibroblasts activation to exacerbate sepsis-associated pulmonary fibrosis. Respir Res. 2025;26(1):347.
88.
Li J, Zeng G, Zhang Z, Wang Y, Shao M, Li C, Lu Z, Zhao Y, Zhang F, Ding W. Urban airborne PM2.5 induces pulmonary fibrosis through triggering glycolysis and subsequent modification of histone lactylation in macrophages. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2024;273:Article 116162.
89.
Cui H, Xie N, Banerjee S, Ge J, Jiang D, Dey T, Matthews QL, Liu RM, Liu G. Lung myofibroblasts promote macrophage profibrotic activity through lactate-induced histone lactylation. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2021;64(1):115–125.
90.
Zhou Y, Yan J, Huang H, Liu L, Ren L, Hu J, Jiang X, Zheng Y, Xu L, Zhong F, et al.The m6A reader IGF2BP2 regulates glycolytic metabolism and mediates histone lactylation to enhance hepatic stellate cell activation and liver fibrosis. Cell Death Dis. 2024;15(3):189.
91.
Rho H, Terry AR, Chronis C, Hay N. Hexokinase 2-mediated gene expression via histone lactylation is required for hepatic stellate cell activation and liver fibrosis. Cell Metab. 2023;35(8):1406–1423.e8.
92.
Zhang Y, Li L, Li G, Zhu J, Qi Z, Zhang C. HKDC1 promotes the H3K18 lactylation of the promoter of ORMDL3 to induce the activation of hepatic stellate cells in liver cirrhosis. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2025;1872(3):Article 168140.
93.
Zhang X, Chen J, Lin R, Huang Y, Wang Z, Xu S, Wang L, Chen F, Zhang J, Pan K, et al.Lactate drives epithelial-mesenchymal transition in diabetic kidney disease via the H3K14la/KLF5 pathway. Redox Biol. 2024;75:Article 103246.
94.
Xiang T, Wang X, Huang S, Zhou K, Fei S, Zhou B, Yue K, Li Q, Xue S, Dai Y, et al.Inhibition of PKM2 by shikonin impedes TGF-β1 expression by repressing histone lactylation to alleviate renal fibrosis. Phytomedicine. 2025;136:Article 156324.
95.
Lopaschuk GD, Karwi QG, Tian R, Wende AR, Abel ED. Cardiac energy metabolism in heart failure. Circ Res. 2021;128(10):1487–1513.
96.
Cummins G, Kremer J, Bernassau A, Brown A, Bridle HL, Schulze H, Bachmann TT, Crichton M, Denison FC, Desmulliez MPY. Sensors for fetal hypoxia and metabolic acidosis: A review. Sensors. 2018;18(8):2648.
97.
Liu L, Zhang J, Dong Z, Cui Y, Zou X, Lai H, Gu J, Weng X, Jin X, Qiu T, et al.Histone lactylation-mediated metabolic remodeling in vascular smooth muscle cells aggravates aortic aneurysm and dissection by promoting lactate accumulation. Circulation. 2026;153(3):189–209.
98.
Mao Y, Zhang J, Zhou Q, He X, Zheng Z, Wei Y, Zhou K, Lin Y, Yu H, Zhang H, et al.Hypoxia induces mitochondrial protein lactylation to limit oxidative phosphorylation. Cell Res. 2024;34(1):13–30.
99.
Si W-Y, Yang C-L, Wei S-L, Du T, Li L-K, Dong J, Zhou Y, Li H, Zhang P, Liu Q-J, et al.Therapeutic potential of microglial SMEK1 in regulating H3K9 lactylation in cerebral ischemia-reperfusion. Commun Biol. 2024;7(1):1701.
100.
Pan RY, He L, Zhang J, Liu X, Liao Y, Gao J, Liao Y, Yan Y, Li Q, Zhou X, et al.Positive feedback regulation of microglial glucose metabolism by histone H4 lysine 12 lactylation in Alzheimer’s disease. Cell Metab. 2022;34(4):634–648.e6.
101.
Zhao W, Wang Y, Liu J, Yang Q, Zhang S, Hu X, Shi Z, Zhang Z, Tian J, Chu D, et al.Progesterone activates the histone lactylation-Hif1α-glycolysis feedback loop to promote decidualization. Endocrinology. 2023;165(1):Article bqad169.
102.
Wan N, Wang N, Yu S, Zhang H, Tang S, Wang D, Lu W, Li H, Delafield DG, Kong Y, et al.Cyclic immonium ion of lactyllysine reveals widespread lactylation in the human proteome. Nat Methods. 2022;19(7):854–864.
103.
Shao C, Tang S, Yu S, Liu C, Zhang Y, Wan T, He Z, Yuan Q, Wu S, Zhang H, et al.Genetic code expansion reveals site-specific lactylation in living cells reshapes protein functions. Nat Commun. 2025;16(1):227.
104.
Cheng Z, Huang H, Li M, Chen Y. Proteomic analysis identifies PFKP lactylation in SW480 colon cancer cells. iScience. 2024;27(1):Article 108645.
105.
Wang J, Yang P, Yu T, Gao M, Liu D, Zhang J, Lu C, Chen X, Zhang X, Liu Y. Lactylation of PKM2 suppresses inflammatory metabolic adaptation in pro-inflammatory macrophages. Int J Biol Sci. 2022;18(16):6210–6225.
106.
Frangogiannis NG. The inflammatory response in myocardial injury, repair, and remodelling. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014;11(5):255–265.
107.
Nahrendorf M, Swirski FK. Monocyte and macrophage heterogeneity in the heart. Circ Res. 2013;112(12):1624–1633.
108.
Li M, Sun X, Zeng L, Sun A, Ge J. Metabolic homeostasis of immune cells modulates cardiovascular diseases. Research. 2025;8:0679.
109.
Irizarry-Caro RA, McDaniel MM, Overcast GR, Jain VG, Troutman TD, Pasare C. TLR signaling adapter BCAP regulates inflammatory to reparatory macrophage transition by promoting histone lactylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117(48):30628–30638.
110.
Sun S, Lai C, Huang C, Ren X, Zhang T, Zou J, Tong Y, Zhou Q, Lu J, Shen Z, et al.Exercise-induced histone lactylation in monocyte-derived macrophages restores cardiac immune homeostasis and function in sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy. Nat Commun. 2025;17(1):756.
111.
Su Z, Lan J, Wang Y, Ma N, Yang J, Liang D, Zeng H, Yang M. Lactylation-driven ALKBH5 diminishes macrophage NLRP3 inflammasome activation in patients with G6PT deficiency. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2025;155(6):1783–1799.e8.
112.
Chen L, Zhang M, Yang X, Wang Y, Huang T, Li X, Ban Y, Li Q, Yang Q, Zhang Y, et al.Methyl-CpG-binding 2 K271 lactylation-mediated M2 macrophage polarization inhibits atherosclerosis. Theranostics. 2024;14(11):4256–4277.
113.
Ma XM, Geng K, Wang P, Jiang Z, Law BY-K, Xu Y. MCT4-dependent lactate transport: A novel mechanism for cardiac energy metabolism injury and inflammation in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024;23(1):96.
114.
Yuan K, Liu J, Chen G, Wang P, Wei L. Histone lactylation-induced GLI3 activation drives macrophage M1 polarization and exosomal SERPINE1 release in abdominal aortic aneurysm progression. Cell Death Discov. 2025;11(1):523.
115.
Carmeliet P. Angiogenesis in life, disease and medicine. Nature. 2005;438(7070):932–936.
116.
Wu X, Reboll MR, Korf-Klingebiel M, Wollert KC. Angiogenesis after acute myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Res. 2021;117(5):1257–1273.
117.
Parma L, Baganha F, Quax PHA, de Vries MR. Plaque angiogenesis and intraplaque hemorrhage in atherosclerosis. Eur J Pharmacol. 2017;816:107–115.
118.
Fan W, Zeng S, Wang X, Wang G, Liao D, Li R, He S, Li W, Huang J, Li X, et al.A feedback loop driven by H3K9 lactylation and HDAC2 in endothelial cells regulates VEGF-induced angiogenesis. Genome Biol. 2024;25(1):165.
119.
Wang X, Huang J, Fan W, Li N, Yang H, Yang W, Li W, Li R, Liu J, Li X, et al.Lactate-binding protein DNMT3A in HRMECs promotes angiogenesis by upregulating VEGFA through HIF-1α lactylation. Genome Biol. 2025;26(1):377.
120.
Zuo S, Li L, Tang J, Ye F, Sok, Liu Y, Ge S, Jia R, Fan X, Chai P, et al.Lactylation-boosted m5C RNA modification drives choroidal neovascularization. Research. 2025;8:0913.
121.
Chen X, Wang Y, Wang JN, Zhang YC, Zhang YR, Sun RX, Qin B, Dai YX, Zhu HJ, Zhao JX, et al.Lactylation-driven FTO targets CDK2 to aggravate microvascular anomalies in diabetic retinopathy. EMBO Mol Med. 2024;16(2):294–318.
122.
Wang X, Fan W, Li N, Ma Y, Yao M, Wang G, He S, Li W, Tan J, Lu Q, et al.YY1 lactylation in microglia promotes angiogenesis through transcription activation-mediated upregulation of FGF2. Genome Biol. 2023;24(1):87.
123.
Luo Y, Yang Z, Yu Y, Zhang P. HIF1α lactylation enhances KIAA1199 transcription to promote angiogenesis and vasculogenic mimicry in prostate cancer. Int J Biol Macromol. 2022;222(Pt B):2225–2243.
124.
Zhang M, Zhao Y, Liu X, Ruan X, Wang P, Liu L, Wang D, Dong W, Yang C, Xue Y. Pseudogene MAPK6P4-encoded functional peptide promotes glioblastoma vasculogenic mimicry development. Commun Biol. 2023;6(1):1059.
125.
Li L, Chen K, Wang T, Wu Y, Xing G, Chen M, Hao Z, Zhang C, Zhang J, Ma B, et al.Glis1 facilitates induction of pluripotency via an epigenome-metabolome-epigenome signalling cascade. Nat Metab. 2020;2(9):882–892.
126.
Dai W, Wu G, Liu K, Chen Q, Tao J, Liu H, Shen M. Lactate promotes myogenesis via activating H3K9 lactylation-dependent up-regulation of Neu2 expression. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2023;14(6):2851–2865.
127.
Chen Y, Wu J, Zhai L, Zhang T, Yin H, Gao H, Zhao F, Wang Z, Yang X, Jin M, et al.Metabolic regulation of homologous recombination repair by MRE11 lactylation. Cell. 2024;187(2):294–311.e21.
128.
Zhang Y, Jiang H, Dong M, Min J, He X, Tan Y, Liu F, Chen M, Chen X, Yin Q, et al.Macrophage MCT4 inhibition activates reparative genes and protects from atherosclerosis by histone H3 lysine 18 lactylation. Cell Rep. 2024;43(5):Article 114180.
129.
Wang Y, Chen L, Zhang M, Li X, Yang X, Huang T, Ban Y, Li Y, Li Q, Zheng Y, et al.Exercise-induced endothelial Mecp2 lactylation suppresses atherosclerosis via the Ereg/MAPK signalling pathway. Atherosclerosis. 2023;375:45–58.
130.
Welt FGP, Batchelor W, Spears JR, Penna C, Pagliaro P, Ibanez B, Drakos SG, Dangas G, Kapur NK. Reperfusion injury in patients with acute myocardial infarction: JACC scientific statement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024;83(22):2196–2213.
131.
Jiang M, Xie X, Cao F, Wang Y. Mitochondrial metabolism in myocardial remodeling and mechanical unloading: Implications for ischemic heart disease. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:Article 789267.
132.
Yu W, Kong Q, Jiang S, Li Y, Wang Z, Mao Q, Zhang X, Liu Q, Zhang P, Li Y, et al.HSPA12A maintains aerobic glycolytic homeostasis and Histone3 lactylation in cardiomyocytes to attenuate myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. JCI Insight. 2024;9(7):Article e169125.
133.
Tanai E, Frantz S. Pathophysiology of heart failure. Compr Physiol. 2015;6(1):187–214.
134.
Martín-Rodríguez F, López-Izquierdo R, Castro Villamor MA, Del Pozo Vegas C, Delgado Benito MDP, Martínez Caballero CM, Priego Martínez V, Martín Conty JL, Mayo-Iscar A, Sánchez-Soberón I, et al.The prognostic value of prehospital blood lactate levels to predict early mortality in acute cardiovascular disease. Shock. 2020;53(2):164–170.
135.
Zhao S-S, Liu J, Wu Q-C, Zhou X-L. Lactate regulates pathological cardiac hypertrophy via histone lactylation modification. J Cell Mol Med. 2024;28(16):Article e70022.
136.
Wang M, Liu Z, Ma Y, Li D, Lin Y, Wang Y, Fu D, Guo H, Hu L. Histone H3 lysine 18 lactylation promotes cardiac hypertrophy through activating GATA binding protein 4 signaling. MedComm (2020). 2025;6(11):Article e70421.
137.
Pepin ME, Ha CM, Crossman DK, Litovsky SH, Varambally S, Barchue JP, Pamboukian SV, Diakos NA, Drakos SG, Pogwizd SM, et al.Genome-wide DNA methylation encodes cardiac transcriptional reprogramming in human ischemic heart failure. Lab Investig. 2019;99(3):371–386.
138.
Chen Z, Zhong M, Lin Y, Zhang W, Zhu Y, Chen L, Huang Z, Luo K, Lu Z, Huang Z, et al.METTL7B-induced histone lactylation prevents heart failure by ameliorating cardiac remodelling. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2025;202:64–80.
139.
Freeman RV, Otto CM. Spectrum of calcific aortic valve disease: Pathogenesis, disease progression, and treatment strategies. Circulation. 2005;111(24):3316–3326.
140.
Towler DA. Molecular and cellular aspects of calcific aortic valve disease. Circ Res. 2013;113(2):198–208.
141.
Demer LL, Tintut Y. Vascular calcification: Pathobiology of a multifaceted disease. Circulation. 2008;117(22):2938–2948.
142.
Jaminon A, Reesink K, Kroon A, Schurgers L. The role of vascular smooth muscle cells in arterial remodeling: Focus on calcification-related processes. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(22):5694.
143.
Huang Y, Wang C, Zhou T, Xie F, Liu Z, Xu H, Liu M, Wang S, Li L, Chi Q, et al.Lumican promotes calcific aortic valve disease through H3 histone lactylation. Eur Heart J. 2024;45(37):3871–3885.
144.
Wang C, Wang S, Wang Z, Han J, Jiang N, Qu L, Xu K. Andrographolide regulates H3 histone lactylation by interfering with p300 to alleviate aortic valve calcification. Br J Pharmacol. 2024;181(12):1843–1856.
145.
Zhu Y, Chen J-C, Zhang J-L, Wang F-F, Liu R-P. A new mechanism of arterial calcification in diabetes: Interaction between H3K18 lactylation and CHI3L1. Clin Sci. 2025;139(2):115–130.
146.
Michel JB, Jondeau G, Milewicz DM. From genetics to response to injury: Vascular smooth muscle cells in aneurysms and dissections of the ascending aorta. Cardiovasc Res. 2018;114(4):578–589.
147.
Chen J, Zhang M, Liu Y, Zhao S, Wang Y, Wang M, Niu W, Jin F, Li Z. Histone lactylation driven by mROS-mediated glycolytic shift promotes hypoxic pulmonary hypertension. J Mol Cell Biol. 2023;14(12):Article mjac073.
148.
Wei T, Guo Y, Huang C, Sun M, Zhou B, Gao J, Shen W. Fibroblast-to-cardiomyocyte lactate shuttle modulates hypertensive cardiac remodelling. Cell Biosci. 2023;13(1):151.
149.
Cluntun AA, Badolia R, Lettlova S, Parnell KM, Shankar TS, Diakos NA, Olson KA, Taleb I, Tatum SM, Berg JA, et al.The pyruvate-lactate axis modulates cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure. Cell Metab. 2021;33(3):629–648.e10.
150.
Yao X, Li C. Lactate dehydrogenase A mediated histone lactylation induced the pyroptosis through targeting HMGB1. Metab Brain Dis. 2023;38(5):1543–1553.
151.
Fang L, Yu Z, Qian X, Fang H, Wang Y. LDHA exacerbates myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury through inducing NLRP3 lactylation. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024;24(1):651.
152.
Tashima T. Nanoparticle-based targeted drug delivery methods for heart-specific distribution in cardiovascular therapy. Pharmaceutics. 2025;17(11):1365.
153.
Chu X, Di C, Chang P, Li L, Feng Z, Xiao S, Yan X, Xu X, Li H, Qi R, et al.Lactylated histone H3K18 as a potential biomarker for the diagnosis and predicting the severity of septic shock. Front Immunol. 2021;12:Article 786666.
154.
Dai W, Qiao X, Fang Y, Guo R, Bai P, Liu S, Li T, Jiang Y, Wei S, Na Z, et al.Epigenetics-targeted drugs: Current paradigms and future challenges. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024;9(1):332.
155.
Liao Y, Niu L, Ling J, Cui Y, Huang Z, Xu J, Jiang Y, Yu P, Liu X. Turning sour into sweet: Lactylation modification as a promising target in cardiovascular health. Metabolism. 2025;156234.
156.
Jiang J, Wang R, Song P, Peng Q, Jin X, Li B, Ni J, Shen J, Bao J, Wu Z, et al.Lactate facilitates pancreatic repair following acute pancreatitis by promoting reparative macrophage polarization. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025;19(9):Article 101535.
157.
Lu Z, Fang P, Li S, Xia D, Zhang J, Wu X, Pan J, Cai H, Fu L, Sun G, et al.Lactylation of histone H3k18 and Egr1 promotes endothelial glycocalyx degradation in sepsis-induced acute lung injury. Adv Sci. 2025;12(7):Article e2407064.
158.
Huang C, Xue L, Lin X, Shen Y, Wang X. Histone lactylation-driven GPD2 mediates M2 macrophage polarization to promote malignant transformation of cervical cancer progression. DNA Cell Biol. 2024;43(12):605–618.
159.
Blaszczak W, Williams H, Swietach P. Autoregulation of H+/lactate efflux prevents monocarboxylate transport (MCT) inhibitors from reducing glycolytic lactic acid production. Br J Cancer. 2022;127(7):1365–1377.
160.
Li K, Niu L, Zhang X, Li T, Zhou X, Wang L, Han J, Wang Z. NEAT1 is a therapeutic target for reversing T-cell exhaustion in bladder cancer. J Immunother Cancer. 2025;13(12):Article e013733.
161.
Sun C, Li X, Teng Q, Liu X, Song L, Schiöth HB, Wu H, Ma X, Zhang Z, Qi C, et al.Targeting platinum-resistant ovarian cancer by disrupting histone and RAD51 lactylation. Theranostics. 2025;15(7):3055–3075.
162.
Gao R, Li Y, Xu Z, Zhang F, Xu J, Hu Y, Yin J, Yang K, Sun L, Wang Q, et al.Mitochondrial pyruvate carrier 1 regulates fatty acid synthase lactylation and mediates treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2023;78(6):1800–1815.
163.
Sun T, Liu B, Li Y, Wu J, Cao Y, Yang S, Tan H, Cai L, Zhang S, Qi X, et al.Oxamate enhances the efficacy of CAR-T therapy against glioblastoma via suppressing ectonucleotidases and CCR8 lactylation. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2023;42(1):253.
164.
Merkuri F, Rothstein M, Simoes-Costa M. Histone lactylation couples cellular metabolism with developmental gene regulatory networks. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):90.
165.
Li F, Si W, Xia L, Yin D, Wei T, Tao M, Cui X, Yang J, Hong T, Wei R. Positive feedback regulation between glycolysis and histone lactylation drives oncogenesis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Mol Cancer. 2024;23(1):90.
166.
Xie B, Zhang M, Li J, Cui J, Zhang P, Liu F, Wu Y, Deng W, Ma J, Li X, et al.KAT8-catalyzed lactylation promotes eEF1A2-mediated protein synthesis and colorectal carcinogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2024;121(8):Article e2314128121.
167.
Chen H, Li Y, Li H, Chen X, Fu H, Mao D, Chen W, Lan L, Wang C, Hu K, et al.NBS1 lactylation is required for efficient DNA repair and chemotherapy resistance. Nature. 2024;631(8021):663–669.
168.
Wang R, Li C, Cheng Z, Li M, Shi J, Zhang Z, Jin S, Ma H. H3K9 lactylation in malignant cells facilitates CD8+ T cell dysfunction and poor immunotherapy response. Cell Rep. 2024;43(9):Article 114686.
169.
He X, Li Y, Li J, Li Y, Chen S, Yan X, Xie Z, Du J, Chen G, Song J, et al.HDAC2-mediated METTL3 delactylation promotes DNA damage repair and chemotherapy resistance in triple-negative breast cancer. Adv Sci. 2025;12(14):Article e2413121.
170.
Jin J, Bai L, Wang D, Ding W, Cao Z, Yan P, Li Y, Xi L, Wang Y, Zheng X, et al.SIRT3-dependent delactylation of cyclin E2 prevents hepatocellular carcinoma growth. EMBO Rep. 2023;24(5):Article e56052.
171.
An S, Yao Y, Hu H, Wu J, Li J, Li L, Wu J, Sun M, Deng Z, Zhang Y, et al.PDHA1 hyperacetylation-mediated lactate overproduction promotes sepsis-induced acute kidney injury via Fis1 lactylation. Cell Death Dis. 2023;14(7):457.
Year 2026 volume 9 Issue 4
PDF
71
40
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.34133/research.1228
  • Receive Date:2025-12-02
  • Online Date:2026-10-16
  • Published:2026-04-20
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-12-02
  • Revised:2026-03-10
  • Accepted:2026-03-11
Affiliations
    1Department of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
    2Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Shanghai 200032, China.
    3State Key Laboratory of Cardiology, Shanghai 200032, China.
    4National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai 200032, China.
    5Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai 200032, China.
    6Key Laboratory of Viral Heart Diseases, National Health Commission, Shanghai 200032, China.
    7Key Laboratory of Viral Heart Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai 200032, China.

Corresponding:

* Address correspondence to: (J.G.);
* Address correspondence to: (H.L.)
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/research/EN/10.34133/research.1228
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT