收藏切换
The Brain–Gut Health Initiative (BIGHI): A Prospective Cohort on Psychiatric Disorders in China
收藏切换
PDF
Fengchun Wu1, *, Baoyuan Zhu2, 3, Shixuan Feng1, Hehua Li1, 4, Jing Zhou3, 5, 6, 7, Yuping Ning1, 4, Yuanyuan Huang1, 4, *, Kai Wu2, 5, 8, *
Research. Vol 9 Article ID 1142
Less
收藏切换
Research. Vol 9 Article ID 1142
• REVIEW ARTICLE •
The Brain–Gut Health Initiative (BIGHI): A Prospective Cohort on Psychiatric Disorders in China
Full
Fengchun Wu1, *, Baoyuan Zhu2, 3, Shixuan Feng1, Hehua Li1, 4, Jing Zhou3, 5, 6, 7, Yuping Ning1, 4, Yuanyuan Huang1, 4, *, Kai Wu2, 5, 8, *
Affiliations
  • 1Department of Psychiatry, The Affiliated Brain Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510370, China.
  • 2School of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou International Campus, Guangzhou 511442, China.
  • 3School of Materials Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.
  • 4Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center for Translational Medicine of Mental Disorders, Guangzhou 510370, China.
  • 5National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
  • 6Institute of Gerontology, Guangzhou Geriatric Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  • 7Collaborative Innovation Center for Civil Affairs of Guangzhou, Guangzhou, China.
  • 8Department of Aging Research and Geriatric Medicine, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8575, Japan.
About Author:

† These authors contributed equally to this work.

Published: 2026-03-20 doi: 10.34133/research.1142
Outline
收藏切换

Major psychiatric disorders are characterized by substantial clinical heterogeneity and high comorbidity, yet their underlying biological mechanisms are not fully uncovered. The microbiota–gut–brain axis (MGBA) offers a cross-system perspective for elucidating the pathophysiology of major psychiatric disorders. The Brain–Gut Health Initiative (BIGHI) was established as the first prospective longitudinal cohort in China dedicated to investigating major psychiatric disorders guided by the framework of MGBA, enabling large-scale, transdiagnostic, and longitudinal analyses of brain–gut interactions. To date, the BIGHI has enrolled over 1,200 participants with schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and healthy controls, with multidimensional data collected including clinical symptomatology, neurocognitive performance, electroencephalography, magnetic resonance imaging, peripheral blood biomarkers, and gut microbiome profiles. The studies within the BIGHI reveal (a) brain–gut physiological alterations in psychiatric disorders; (b) systematic relationships among brain function, peripheral physiological markers, and gut microbiome; and (c) brain–gut network patterns with marked interindividual heterogeneity. In future studies, we will expand the BIGHI into a collaborative network and promote data harmonization and interdisciplinary collaboration to advance computational psychiatry as well as its clinical translation.

Fengchun Wu, Baoyuan Zhu, Shixuan Feng, Hehua Li, Jing Zhou, Yuping Ning, Yuanyuan Huang, Kai Wu. The Brain–Gut Health Initiative (BIGHI): A Prospective Cohort on Psychiatric Disorders in China[J]. Research, 2026 , 9 (3) : 1142 - . DOI: 10.34133/research.1142
Psychiatric disorders represent a growing global health burden, affecting nearly 10% of the population worldwide and substantially impacting approximately one-quarter of families [1]. Over the past 30 years, China has experienced unprecedented economic development and social transformation. These transformations have driven major shifts in demographics, urbanization, mobility, education, and disease epidemiology, with significant implications for the onset and management of psychiatric disorders [2]. According to a nationally representative epidemiological survey of psychiatric disorders in China, the lifetime prevalence of any psychiatric disorder (excluding late-life dementia) among adults is 16.57%, with anxiety and mood disorders being the most common. Notably, severe psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia (SZ), major depressive disorder (MDD), and bipolar disorder (BD) impose a disproportionate public health burden due to their chronic course, high disability rates, and substantial treatment gaps [3]. Furthermore, according to the latest report from the World Health Organization, the global burden of psychiatric disorder has significantly increased following the COVID-19 pandemic. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of individuals with SZ, MDD, and other psychiatric disorder has increased by 25% to 27.6%, and the pandemic’s impact on mental health is expected to last for at least 2 decades [4]. As this long-term impact continues, the prevalence of psychiatric disorders in China continues to rise, but the field of mental health still faces multiple challenges, such as insufficient public awareness, a lack of medical resources, and weak professional capacity. More critically, diagnosis remains primarily reliant on subjective clinical assessments, lacking objective biomarkers, which hinders accurate disease identification and timely intervention [5].
In recent years, a growing body of study has highlighted the importance of gut–brain communication in maintaining host health [6–8], and the microbiota–gut–brain axis (MGBA) offers a new perspective for understanding the origins and development of psychiatric disorders [9]. It represents a complex bidirectional communication network between the gut and the brain involving neural pathways immune signaling and microbial-derived metabolites such as neurotransmitter precursors and short-chain fatty acids that collectively regulate host health [10]. Accumulating evidence now suggests that the MGBA plays a potential role in the development and progression of psychiatric disorders [11]. The integrity and functionality of the MGBA are shaped by genetic, environmental, dietary [12], pharmacological, and psychosocial factors [13], highlighting the need to elucidate its mechanisms to better understand and treat psychiatric disorders [14,15].
To better understand how these factors influence psychiatric disorders, numerous studies have investigated gut microbiome profiles in relation to brain imaging, revealing disease-associated alterations in the MGBA. For instance, alterations in the gut microbiome of patients with SZ, including changes in the family Bifidobacteriaceae, were observed and found sufficient to differentiate SZ patients from healthy controls (HC). Experimental studies further support a causal role for these microbial changes, as fecal microbiota from patients with SZ could induce behavioral abnormalities such as hyperactivity and anxiety in mice [16]. Similarly, a clinical study involving 97 individuals reported significant differences in the composition and diversity of the gut microbiome between BD patients and HC [17]. After the treatment with quetiapine, significant changes in the Bacteroidetes phylum of patients with BD were observed. Subsequent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis demonstrated that the abundance of Bacteroidetes could effectively differentiate treatment responders from nonresponders. Additionally, fecal microbiota from rats exhibiting negative behaviors were shown to induce depression-like symptoms in recipient mice, indicating a key role of the gut microbiome in stress vulnerability [18].
To overcome the limitations of single-modality approaches, studies have increasingly combined gut microbiome profiling with brain imaging, providing a more comprehensive understanding of MGBA function. A recent genome-wide association analysis of 5 psychiatric disorders, including SZ and BD, reported that measures of brain white matter integrity mediated the association between variation in the gut microbiome and psychiatric conditions [19]. Similarly, studies on healthy individuals have shown that gut microbiome is associated with brain structure and function [20]. These studies highlight the pivotal role and potential application of the MGBA hypothesis in understanding the pathophysiological mechanisms of various psychiatric disorders and in the development of diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.
Despite growing evidence linking the MGBA to psychiatric disorders, most clinical studies are cross-sectional, limiting causal inference between gut dysbiosis and brain dysfunction, and failing to capture dynamic changes across disease progression, thus hindering clinical translation [21]. Additionally, several population cohorts centered on gut microbiota have been preliminarily established both domestically and internationally [22], alongside some large-scale cohorts focused on functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), laying the groundwork for research in this field [23]. Additionally, the China Brain Multi-omics Atlas Project has been proposed as a large-scale research initiative aimed at constructing a human brain molecular reference atlas for East Asian populations through the integration of multi-omics data [24]. However, existing research predominantly relies on single-modality or limited omics approaches, with most cohorts constructed independently around isolated aspects of the gut microbiome, neuroimaging, or clinical phenotypes. Such designs lack systematic integration of multi-system biological information within the same individuals and a unified temporal framework. In the context of psychiatric disorders, which are highly heterogeneous and dynamically evolving, single-modality data are often insufficient to capture the holistic biological architecture of patients or to characterize dynamic changes associated with disease progression and therapeutic interventions.
To overcome this critical bottleneck, we established the Brain–Gut Health Initiative (BIGHI), the first cohort in China systematically focused on the MGBA, encompassing major psychiatric disorders including SZ, MDD, and BD, as well as HC. To date, the BIGHI cohort has integrated multidimensional data from more than 1,000 individuals, encompassing standardized clinical symptom ratings, neurocognitive assessments, electroencephalography (EEG), MRI, gut microbiome profiles, and blood-based biochemical indicators, all collected within a unified clinical and temporal framework. This high-quality dataset provides a solid foundation for systematically investigating dynamic MGBA-related processes in psychiatric disorders and is grounded in a series of our prior studies. These studies, conducted during cohort development, established and validated feasible strategies for multimodal data acquisition, integration, and analysis, yielding an operational framework for understanding multisystem co-dysregulation and supporting subsequent cross-system modeling and biomarker research (Fig. 1).
The BIGHI is a longitudinal cohort study conducted in 5 distinct phases, each targeting specific psychiatric populations and employing tailored data collection strategies (Table 1). The following sections detail the study participants and corresponding data acquisition methods.
Participants were recruited from The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University and included individuals diagnosed with SZ, BD, MDD, and HC. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University and was conducted in accordance with the latest version of the Declaration of Helsinki (2013). All participants met the following general criteria: aged between 18 and 45 years, of Han ethnicity, right-handed, and provided written informed consent. Psychiatric diagnoses were determined based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) and were validated through the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM conducted by trained clinicians. SZ patients were required to have a Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score ≥ 60, with at least 2 items scoring ≥ 4 on the positive symptom subscale. BD participants met DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for BD and were categorized based on their current mood state at the time of assessment, including (a) manic-state BD, defined as meeting DSM-5 criteria for a hypomanic or manic episode with a Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) score > 20, and being medication-naïve or free of psychotropic medications for at least 6 months; (b) depressive-state BD, defined as meeting DSM-5 criteria for a depressive episode with a Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) score > 17 and YMRS score < 7, and being medication-naïve or medication-free for at least 6 months; and (c) clinically remitted BD, defined as HAMD-17 scores < 7 and YMRS scores < 5 across 4 consecutive visits with no significant current manic or depressive symptoms. First-episode depression patients met criteria for MDD, had a HAMD-17 score ≥ 17 and YMRS score ≤ 5, with illness duration ≤ 2 years and no prior use of psychotropic medications. HC participants were recruited from the community and via public postings on the internet. HC participants were required to have no history of mental illness, family history of mental illness, or history of psychotropic substance use. This standardized inclusion framework ensured diagnostic rigor and cohort comparability across clinical groups (Fig. 2).
Exclusion criteria were as follows: (a) meeting DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for any psychiatric disorder other than the 3 target diagnoses (MDD, SZ, or BD), including but not limited to pervasive developmental disorders, intellectual disability, anxiety disorders, eating disorders, or other Axis I conditions; (b) meeting criteria for alcohol or drug dependence, or having a history of substance abuse (excluding caffeine and nicotine) within the past 3 months; (c) having severe physical illnesses such as hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease, or any unstable systemic condition; (d) having a history of brain or cervical spine surgery, severe head trauma with loss of consciousness, epilepsy, febrile seizures, coma, or any organic brain lesion; (e) using antibiotics within the past 3 months; (f) receiving modified electroconvulsive therapy within the past 6 months; (g) being pregnant or breastfeeding; (h) having a history of gastrointestinal or other major digestive disorders; and (i) having any neurological or systemic condition known to affect cognitive function.
General information was collected by trained clinicians and included a wide range of human phenotypic characteristics, such as gender, age, education level, handedness, age of onset, disease duration, past medical history, dietary habits, sleep patterns, and family history. The following tools were employed:
HAMD-17 [25]: Widely used in clinical practice, this scale has good application reliability and is commonly used to assess the severity of depressive states in patients for the current time and the previous week. Total score less than 7: no depressive state; score 7 to 17: possible depressive state; score 18 to 24: depressive; score greater than 24: severe depressive.
Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) [26]: This scale consists of 14 items and is an important clinical assessment tool. HAMA can effectively reflect the severity of anxiety symptoms in patients for the current time and the previous week. Total score less than 7: no anxiety symptoms; score greater than or equal to 14: definite anxiety; score greater than or equal to 21: marked anxiety; score greater than or equal to 29: severe anxiety.
YMRS [27]: Primarily used to assess mania symptoms and severity. Result criteria: 0 to 5: normal; 6 to 12: mild mania; 13 to 19: moderate mania; 20 to 29: severe mania; over 30: extreme mania.
PANSS [28]: Composed of 7 positive symptoms, 7 negative symptoms, and 16 general psychopathological symptoms, totaling 30 items, with 3 additional items assessing the risk of aggression.
MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) [29]: Assesses processing speed, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning and memory, visual learning and memory, reasoning and problem-solving, and social cognition.
The aforementioned scales are administered by trained and qualified psychiatrists who strictly follow the guidelines and scoring criteria. Assessments are based on all information from the week prior to evaluation, relying on live conversation, observation, and informant information.
Both patient and HC groups provide 5 ml of venous blood samples upon enrollment for testing. Within a 48-h window from clinical data collection, ensuring patients have fasted for over 8 h, venous blood is collected and sent to the Department of Laboratory Medicine at The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University for testing. Remaining venous blood samples are tested for laboratory markers, with serum separation within 12 h, centrifugation at 3,000 rpm at room temperature for 10 min, separating the supernatant plasma and the pelleted blood cells, both of which are stored at −80 °C for future use.
Resting-state EEG recordings were acquired by trained technicians in a sound-attenuated, dimly lit room. Participants sat comfortably with eyes closed for 10 min and were instructed to remain relaxed, avoid excessive movement, and stay awake. Scalp activity was captured with a 32-channel Ag/AgCl Neuroscan system (international 10–20 montage) at a sampling rate of 1,000 Hz. Pz served as the reference, and an additional ground electrode was placed at AFz. Electrode impedances were maintained below 10 kΩ throughout acquisition, and continuous monitoring allowed real-time adjustment if impedance exceeded this threshold. Before recording, participants removed metallic accessories and were screened for recent caffeine or nicotine intake to minimize physiological artifacts. Raw EEG traces were visually inspected online to mark gross artifacts or drowsiness; these segments were subsequently excluded during preprocessing. All data were timestamped, anonymized, and stored in a secure research server for further analysis.
The MRI images of subjects in phase 1 and 2 were collected using a Siemens Prisma 3.0T MRI scanner, while those of subjects in Periods 3, 4, and 5 were collected using a Philips 3.0T MRI scanner. Both equipment are located at the Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University. Scanning operations are performed by at least one professional radiologist and one professional psychiatrist. This study collects resting-state MRI image data from participants, who are instructed to keep their eyes closed but remain awake and relaxed, minimizing head and swallowing movements. Participants are provided with specialized nonmagnetic headphones and a head restraint to reduce interference and head movement. MRI scans include the following: (a) Resting-state fMRI scans. Gradient-echo planar imaging (GRE-EPI) sequence is used to acquire rs-fMRI images, with the following scan parameters: repetition time = 800 ms; echo time = 30 ms; flip angle = 56°; field of view = 208 × 208 mm2; voxel size = 2 × 2 × 2 mm3; multiband scanning parallel to the anterior–posterior commissure; a total of 72 slices and 450 time points collected per participant. (b) T1 scans. MPRAGE sequence is used to acquire T1 images, with the following scan parameters: repetition time = 2,000 ms; echo time = 2.32 ms; flip angle = 8°; field of view = 230 × 230 mm2; matrix = 256 × 256; slice thickness = 0.9 mm. After acquisition, all participants’ DICOM images are checked by 2 radiologists to ensure no missing data and obvious artifacts before preprocessing.
Participants were instructed to fast for 12 h prior to sample collection and provided both fecal and venous blood samples between 7:00 and 9:00 AM the next morning. All samples were collected aseptically by trained research assistants. Fecal samples were collected using sterile containers and spoons, immediately sealed, and divided into 3 aliquots. To preserve sample integrity, they were transferred to a −80 °C freezer within 30 min. Dietary data were obtained using a 3-day 24-h recall and food frequency questionnaire, documenting the intake of major food groups and calculating nutrient intake. For metagenomic sequencing, microbial DNA was extracted through combined chemical and mechanical lysis, followed by phenol-chloroform purification, RNase treatment, and ethanol precipitation. After quality assessment, DNA was fragmented (~300 to 400 bp), and libraries were constructed via end repair, A-tailing, adaptor ligation, and PCR amplification. Whole-genome shotgun sequencing was performed on the Illumina platform to generate high-quality raw data for downstream analysis.
Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD), while categorical variables were summarized as counts and percentages. The normality of continuous variables was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test, and homogeneity of variance was determined via the Levene test. Group comparisons for categorical variables were performed using the chi-square test. For continuous variables, independent-sample t tests were used when the data met assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance; otherwise, the nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test was applied. For comparisons involving 3 or more groups, either one-way analysis of variance or the Kruskal–Wallis H test was employed based on data distribution, followed by Tukey’s or Dunn’s post hoc tests when necessary. When multiple comparisons were performed, P values were adjusted using the Benjamini–Hochberg method to control the false discovery rate. All statistical analyses were conducted using R or SPSS software, with P value < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
Over the course of 6 years, we established a dataset comprising 1,266 participants, including 893 patients with psychiatric disorders: 509 with MDD (of whom 230 were treatment-naive, first-episode patients), 63 with BD, and 321 with acute exacerbations of SZ. The mean disease duration among patients was 53 months. Additionally, 373 HC were recruited. Detailed demographic and clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 2. Additionally, we conducted structured assessments of participants’ lifestyle habits and health status at both baseline and follow-up stages. These assessments included information on medication adherence, dietary patterns, gastrointestinal symptoms, antibiotic use history, daily activity levels, and exercise frequency. The incorporation of these scales facilitates effective control for lifestyle confounders in subsequent analyses. The relevant follow-up questionnaires and scale contents are fully documented in the Supplementary Materials.
BIGHI is grounded in real-world clinical cohorts and is designed to support the systematic expansion of sample size and accumulation of multimodal data within an established framework for cross-system and cross-diagnostic joint modeling. Core clinical assessments and symptom rating scales are uniformly collected across all participants, with EEG, MRI, gut microbiome profiles, and peripheral biomarkers forming the primary multimodal data layers. Longitudinal follow-up is conducted around key clinical time windows using a structured yet flexible design compatible with real-world clinical practice. Further details regarding sample size planning, multimodal overlap, and follow-up design are provided in the Supplementary Materials.
Dysregulation of the MGBA may constitute a cross-diagnostic mechanism underlying multiple categories of psychiatric disorders. Based on this core hypothesis, BIGHI conducted a series of exploratory studies during the cohort development phase, focusing on different methodologies and diagnostic groups. These studies spanned multiple dimensions including EEG, MRI, gut microbiome, and integrative multi-omics analysis, providing preliminary clues at different systemic levels regarding how MGBA abnormalities manifest biologically and correlate with clinical symptoms. Collectively, this exploratory work establishes a preliminary framework for understanding the multidimensional biological architecture of psychiatric disorders.
From an electrophysiological perspective, EEG enables the characterization of dynamic neural activity patterns in individuals with psychiatric disorders, facilitating the identification of aberrant neural activity features and potential electrophysiological correlates. Through EEG microstate analysis, we evaluated the therapeutic effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on positive symptoms in chronic SZ patients [30]. Over a 4-week treatment period, patients received active or sham 10 Hz stimulation targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) for 5 sessions per week. Active rTMS resulted in a significant reduction in the duration of microstate C and a marked increase in microstate D, indicating that 10 Hz stimulation can ameliorate positive symptoms in chronic SZ and that EEG microstates may serve as sensitive indicators of symptom improvement (Fig. 3A). Furthermore, we calculated features such as nonlinear dynamics across different frequency bands of EEG and brain functional network properties, analyzed EEG signals of SZ patients under cognitive load, and revealed the association between frontal lobe functional impairment and cognitive deficits in SZ. We constructed an automatic classification method based on these EEG features, achieving an accuracy rate of 76.77%, a sensitivity of 72.09%, and a specificity of 80.36% in classifying SZ patients (Fig. 3B).
In studies of MDD, integrating EEG spectral features with machine learning has identified an abnormal pattern of cortical activity that is thought to indirectly reflect dysregulated cortical excitability. MDD patients showed markedly reduced relative α-band power across the parieto-occipital region, attenuated scalp functional connectivity in the α band, and enhanced γ-band connectivity. Notably, reduced α-band power in the left parietal region emerged as a key electrophysiological marker of MDD [31] (Fig. 3C). Recently, by comparing EEG data from patients with MDD and HC, we observed that in the MDD group, there was a significant reduction in alpha wave power in the parieto-occipital region and beta wave power in the right parieto-occipital area. Moreover, the nonperiodic intercept in the parieto-occipital region of the MDD group was significantly lower and positively correlated with the HAMD scores (Fig. 3D), suggesting that this nonperiodic component may serve as a potential biomarker for depression [32]. Additionally, we observed systematic changes in EEG microstate features across different severity levels of MDD symptoms. MDD patients generally exhibited reduced microstate A and increased microstate C, while those with severe MDD also demonstrated prolonged microstate D, suggesting compensatory overactivation of the executive control network. As symptoms worsened, microstate transition flexibility further declined, and microstate D emerged as a potential neural indicator of depression severity [33]. When comparing MDD patients with and without suicidal ideation (SI) to HC, a significant reduction in microstate D was observed, manifested as decreased coverage and fewer transitions from A to D. These alterations accompany slowed processing speed, suggesting that impaired cognitive control functions may represent a key neural mechanism underlying SI [34]. Collectively, these findings highlight EEG’s potential for identifying brain abnormalities and aiding psychiatric diagnosis.
Through the integration of structural and functional MRI, we systematically mapped brain network alterations across diagnostic groups, aiming to pinpoint key regions and connectivity features linked to symptoms, cognition, and illness stage. In terms of SZ, we constructed brain functional networks in patients following antipsychotic treatment and found that changes in the degree centrality of the left anterior inferior parietal lobule were negatively correlated with changes in positive scores (Fig. 4A). Furthermore, the post-treatment degree centrality of this region was significantly negatively associated with performance on the Symbol Digit Modalities Test [35]. Subsequently, we constructed structural–functional brain connectivity maps for first-episode drug-naive SZ, chronic SZ, and HC, and calculated the structural–functional (SC–FC) coupling strength. The results showed that, at the global connectivity level, chronic SZ patients had significantly higher SC–FC coupling strength than first-episode patients. At the node-strength level, first-episode SZ patients exhibited markedly lower coupling strength than HC, and this reduction was positively correlated with PANSS negative symptom scores [36] (Fig. 4B). In addition, by calculating dynamic effective connectivity, we also found that the dynamic connectivity patterns between the cerebellar dentate nucleus and the cerebral cortex in SZ patients were significantly different from those in HC, exhibiting a marked reduction in transition frequency (Fig. 4C), which was associated with neurocognitive functions [37]. As part of our work on intelligent diagnosis, we computed key MRI-based features, including amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF), regional homogeneity (ReHo), and degree centrality, and further analyzed large-scale functional connectivity patterns. Using these multimodal features, we constructed a GCN model to classify SZ and HC. Compared with traditional machine learning and deep learning approaches that rely solely on regional MRI features, integrating functional MRI with connectomics markedly improved classification performance. The model achieved an accuracy of 92.47%, with areas under the receiver operating curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1 score of 95.36%, 88.70%, 95.06%, 92.87%, and 90.45%, respectively [38]. Additionally, we classified SZ patients and HC using 3 brain atlases and 5 classifiers, validating the classification performance with 2 cross-validation methods. The results indicated that the whole-brain atlas with 268 ROIs outperformed the other 2 brain atlases [39]. We also classified SZ patients and HC using an SVM model based on gray matter volume (GMV) and white matter features, achieving an accuracy of 88.4%. Notably, reductions in GMV and alterations in white matter among SZ patients were primarily observed in regions implicated in emotion, memory, and visual processing [40]. Furthermore, we developed an integrated deep learning model that combines 3D and 2D convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures to classify SZ patients using multimodal MRI features. In this framework, 3D images of T1, ReHo, and ALFF were used as inputs to the 3D CNN, whereas SC and FC matrices were used as inputs to the 2D CNN. SE blocks were incorporated, and the softmax layer was replaced with an SVM classifier. The resulting integrated model achieved an accuracy of 89.86%, demonstrating strong potential for improving automated SZ diagnosis [41] (Fig. 4D).
We also conducted studies on BD and MDD. Using resting-state functional connectivity analysis, we found that patients with BD who exhibited suicidal ideation showed significantly reduced voxel-wise consistency in the left fusiform gyrus, left lingual gyrus, right middle temporal gyrus, and left postcentral gyrus compared to those without suicidal ideation. Additionally, in patients with suicidal ideation (Fig. 4E), voxel-wise consistency in the left middle occipital gyrus was negatively correlated with working memory performance [42]. In addition, we examined the relationship among plasma homocysteine (Hcy) levels, brain function, and cognition in BD patients with suicidal ideation (BDSI) and without suicidal ideation (BDNSI). Hcy levels were significantly lower in the BDSI group and positively correlated with fALFF signals in the left posterior cingulate gyrus (Fig. 4F), which further mediated the negative association between Hcy and visual/verbal learning performance [43]. In adolescent MDD patients, we observed a significant reduction in FC between the left posterior putamen and the right dorsomedial prefrontal cortex compared with HC. Further moderation analysis showed that this aberrant FC modulated the relationship between childhood maltreatment and the severity of adolescent-onset MDD symptoms. Interaction analysis additionally revealed that when FC was lower, childhood maltreatment exhibited a stronger positive association with MDD symptom severity [44] (Fig. 4G). In addition, we constructed an edge-centric functional network and compared node entropy between MDD patients with and without suicidal ideation. Patients with suicidal ideation showed reduced subnet entropy in the dorsal attention network and increased entropy in the default mode network. Node-entropy features effectively distinguished the 2 groups, and the observed alterations were associated with the expression of genes involved in cell signaling and immune-inflammatory processes (Fig. 4H). These alterations were associated with visual learning performance and the expression of genes related to immune and inflammatory responses [45].
At the microbiological level, we comprehensively evaluated gut microbiota alterations in major psychiatric disorders to uncover structured associations among microbial profiles, metabolic processes, and clinical symptoms. We found significant alterations in the gut microbiota of patients with SZ [46], including alterations in β-diversity, increases in specific taxa such as Collinsella and Lactobacillus, and disruptions in multiple metabolic pathways such as pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis. Among these microbial features, the abundance of Succinivibrio was positively associated with symptom severity, whereas Corynebacterium showed a negative association (Fig. 5A). We also collected cognitive function, blood biochemical indicators, and gut microbiome data from patients with SZ, focusing on the relationships between oxidative stress markers such as superoxide dismutase (SOD) and Hcy with disease risk and cognitive decline. Machine learning models were further applied to evaluate the potential of SOD as a biomarker. Our findings showed that peripheral SOD levels were generally elevated in SZ patients and accompanied by pronounced gut microbial dysbiosis. The abundances of Collinsella, Desulfovibrio, and other taxa were increased, whereas beneficial genera such as Faecalibacterium, Anaerostipes, Turicibacter, and Ruminococcus were markedly reduced. SOD levels were systematically associated with the abundances of Eubacterium, Collinsella, and Lactobacillus, as well as with cognitive performance, suggesting that oxidative stress may influence brain function through microbiome-related pathways (Fig. 5B) [47]. Another study further demonstrated that Hcy levels were significantly higher in SZ patients compared with HC and were closely associated with poorer verbal learning performance. In addition, Hcy levels showed positive correlations with several gut microbial taxa, including Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Corynebacterium, Mogibacterium, and Bulleidia (Fig. 5C) [48]. In an obesity-specific study of SZ, significant alterations in gut microbiota composition and metabolic profiles were observed. Notably, increased abundance of Collinsella was significantly negatively associated with cognitive function (Fig. 5D), while decreased levels of Clostridium and Butyricicoccus were positively associated with cognitive function [49]. Moreover, studies focusing on nonbacterial gut microbes remain scarce. Metagenomic analysis revealed pronounced dysbiosis across multiple microbial kingdoms in SZ patients, encompassing bacteria, fungi, archaea, and viruses, and identified 21 significantly altered metabolic pathways that showed strong species-function coordination. In addition, the abundance of Streptococcus vestibularis was positively correlated with Hcy levels (Fig. 5E) [50].
To explore cross-system mechanisms of the MGBA, we further integrated multimodal datasets to identify how interactions across systems jointly shape symptomatology and cognitive function. In extending this framework to SZ, we examined the multidimensional associations between the gut microbiome and brain imaging features, uncovering potential interactions underlying disease manifestations (Fig. 6A). At the genus level, we observed markedly reduced abundances of Ruminococcus and Roseburia and an increased abundance of Veillonella in SZ patients. Consistently, MRI analyses revealed decreased GMV and ReHo, together with increased ALFF across multiple brain regions. Gut microbial α-diversity was significantly linked to both measures, and ReHo in the right superior temporal cortex, left cuneus, and right middle temporal gyrus was negatively associated with the abundance of Roseburia [51]. To further explore the connection between the MGBA and psychiatric symptoms, we performed mediation analysis using gut microbiome as the independent variable. Node properties from 7 brain regions, mainly in visual, language, and motor systems (Fig. 6B), significantly mediated the association between Selinomonas abundance and PANSS scores in SZ patients [52]. In terms of data integration, we established, for the first time, an individualized brain–gut–microbiome network (BGMN) by combining multimodal MRI features with gut microbiome profiles. This model achieved high accuracy in distinguishing SZ patients from HC. Among the most discriminative features, Faecalibacterium was associated with MRI-derived features in visual and subcortical regions, while Collinsella correlated with the default mode and subcortical networks (Fig. 6C). Additionally, working memory performance was positively associated with the connectivity between the right inferior parietal lobule and Collinsella, suggesting the potential of BGMN for biomarker discovery in SZ [53]. Leveraging brain–gut network methodology, we further developed a multi-omics graph convolutional network (MO-GCN) and incorporated an attention mechanism to more effectively integrate multi-omics features. The best classification accuracy reached 84.0%. Interpretability analysis showed that the most informative brain features were primarily related to memory and emotional regulation, such as those in the hippocampus and olfactory cortex, while the key microbial features were mainly from Dorea and Ruminococcus. These important features were significantly associated with clinical disease severity and cognitive function [54] (Fig. 6D). Moreover, to address the marked heterogeneity of SZ, we employed a data-driven approach to identify distinct multi-omics subtypes across brain, gut, and brain–gut integrated features. The results revealed that brain and brain–gut subtypes were more strongly associated with symptom profiles, while gut-derived subtypes exhibited closer links to cognitive function (Fig. 6E), highlighting the multilayered heterogeneity of SZ and offering potential pathways for precision diagnosis and treatment [55]. Building upon the multi-omics phenotyping that reveals the multi-layered heterogeneity of SZ, we further extend our analytical framework to the biological age dimension. Recently, we constructed a biological age prediction model using MRI, gut microbiome, and blood-based data. Unlike traditional single-modality biological age estimates, the multimodal approach substantially improved prediction accuracy. Patients with SZ showed a markedly increased biological age gap, which was closely associated with cognitive impairment and disease severity (Fig. 6F), highlighting its potential value in psychiatric assessment [56]. Finally, by integrating gut microbiome profiles, blood-based biomarkers, and EEG network features into a unified multi-omics framework, we substantially improved the diagnostic performance for SZ. The optimized model achieved an accuracy of 91.7% and an AUC of 96.5%. Notably, the most informative features spanned multiple biological domains, including microbial genera (e.g., Lactobacillus and Prevotella), peripheral biomarkers (SOD and immune cell ratios), and EEG-derived measures of nodal efficiency and local network integration within temporal and frontoparietal regions [57] (Fig. 6G). In studies on MDD, recent research has uncovered a critical coupling mechanism between cognitive impairment in first-episode MDD and gut microbiome dysbiosis. Notably, Amycolatopsis sp. Hca4 exhibits significant correlations with cognitive abilities such as processing speed. It influences working memory by modulating functional connectivity between the medial frontal gyrus and parahippocampal gyrus, suggesting that specific microorganisms may serve as pivotal nodes regulating abnormal brain networks and cognitive impairment [58]. These findings highlight the key role of gut–brain interactions in understanding, diagnosing, and treating major psychiatric disorders.
To the best of our knowledge, BIGHI is the first prospective cohort in China dedicated to investigating the MGBA in psychiatric disorders. The BIGHI cohort has several notable strengths. First, it encompasses a wide diagnostic spectrum by systematically enrolling individuals with MDD, SZ, BD, and HC. Second, we implemented standardized protocols with stringent quality control to collect comprehensive data, including clinical assessments, neurocognitive measures, dietary records, EEG, MRI, blood biomarkers, and fecal metagenomic sequencing profiles, along with longitudinal follow-up. This design not only fills a critical gap in domestic research but also overcomes key limitations of previous international studies, such as relatively limited sample sizes, single-diagnosis focus, and cross-sectional designs.
Our study underscores that psychiatric disorders are highly complex and heterogeneous conditions, with distinct pathological features emerging across different omics layers, such as the gut microbiome, neuroimaging, EEG signals, and blood biomarkers. These preliminary findings underscore the systemic nature of psychiatric disorders and emphasize the limitations of single-modality approaches in adequately explaining the complexity of these conditions [59]. The integration of multidimensional data offers new perspectives and pathways for the early identification, subtype classification, and precision intervention of psychiatric disorders [60,61]. In addition, the analysis strategy rigorously controlled key clinical confounders, including age, sex, body mass index, dietary patterns, medication exposure, and lifestyle factors, in order to minimize the influence of nondisease factors on biomarker characteristics [15,62]. Furthermore, we explored the integration of AI, with an emphasis on machine learning and deep learning methods, into psychiatric research. By integrating AI techniques, we can investigate potential biomarkers within the MGBA, such as alterations in functional connectivity and specific gut microbial signatures, to identify early-stage psychiatric conditions and facilitate timely subtyping and precision treatment [63,64]. As the cohort expands to multiple centers, independent external datasets will be used for validation to systematically evaluate model generalizability and ensure its transferable clinical applicability.
Against this backdrop, the BIGHI initiative demonstrates significant scientific value. Leveraging real-world data from individuals with multiple psychiatric disorders and a multimodal data system, this cohort is evolving into China’s first psychiatric disorders research platform capable of both broad-spectrum diagnosis and longitudinal follow-up [65]. More importantly, changes across all levels of the MGBA can be mapped to clinical symptom dimensions, enabling us to reinterpret the pathological structure of psychiatric disorders from a systems biology perspective rather than being confined to single-modality or single-system explanatory frameworks [66,67]. To address persistent challenges in severe psychiatric disorders, including unclear mechanisms, ambiguous subtypes, and unpredictable treatment responses, the multimodal design of BIGHI enables progress in 3 major directions: first, integrating gut microbiota, MRI, EEG, blood markers, and clinical features to decipher cross-system interaction patterns and their structural associations with symptom dimensions [59]; second, systematically comparing shared mechanisms and disease-specific pathways across psychiatric disorders to identify core MGBA pathways with cross-diagnostic significance and support the theoretical framework of the mental disorder continuum [68,69]; and third, leveraging longitudinal follow-up to map MGBA dynamic remodeling patterns during disease onset, progression, and intervention response, thereby identifying key biomarkers predictive of disease course and treatment response [70].
From a mechanistic perspective, existing research on the mechanisms of psychiatric disorders increasingly recognizes the bidirectional regulatory properties of the MGBA, which may influence brain function through neural, immune, and metabolic pathways [9,11]. At the microbiome level, potentially harmful bacteria associated with inflammatory responses and impaired gut barrier function (e.g., Collinsella) show an upward trend, whereas short-chain fatty acid-producing genera such as Faecalibacterium and Roseburia consistently decrease across different diagnostic groups [49,69]. This dysbiotic pattern parallels elevated peripheral inflammation, disrupted tryptophan metabolism, and altered lipid metabolic profiles, suggesting potential pathogenic mechanisms [71,72]. Neuroimaging studies similarly reveal convergent abnormalities in functional connectivity across multiple psychiatric disorders, characterized by strengthened positive coupling between the anterior cingulate cortex and the insula, along with weakened negative connectivity with the posterior parietal cortex and the lateral occipital cortex [73]. However, cross-modal integration of neuroimaging and microbiome data remains notably heterogeneous, and stable, reproducible mechanistic interpretations are still lacking. In addition, combining microbiome data with blood-based inflammatory, metabolic, and neurotransmitter-related biomarkers can enhance the biological interpretability of associations and provide important clues for inferring potential causal pathways within the MGBA [47,48]. Nevertheless, deeper mechanistic validation remains constrained by clinical ethical limitations.
In parallel, ongoing advances in animal experiments and synthetic biology [74–76] have further expanded our understanding of the MGBA mechanism and provided new directions for its therapeutic application in psychiatric disorder. It has been found that transplantation of fecal microbiota from patients with SZ or depression into germ-free mice induces behavioral phenotypes similar to those of psychiatric disorders, such as social withdrawal, cognitive deficits, and emotional abnormalities, suggesting that the MGBA may harbor an underlying causal mechanism [77,78]. However, the process involves complex biological pathways at multiple levels and still needs to be elucidated by systematic studies. It is worth emphasizing that early intervention is of great clinical value in the treatment of psychiatric disorders [79]. Animal experiments have shown that administration of psychobiotics to mice modeling chronic stress significantly alleviated brain dysfunction and anxiety-depression-like behaviors, suggesting a positive intervention potential [80,81]. On this basis, synthetic biology-driven engineered bacteria strategy is also emerging, which is expected to achieve more precise regulation of MGBA by modifying intestinal strains to synthesize neuromodulators such as GABA and 5-HT [82]. Meanwhile, traditional Chinese medicine prescriptions, such as the “xiaoyaosan” has shown potential in regulating the homeostasis of the intestinal flora, which provides a multifaceted therapeutic strategy that integrates the traditional and modern approaches to psychiatric disorders [83]. In the future, how to construct an effective mapping between human MGBA and animal models [84,85], and how to carry out cross-species and mechanism-oriented research will be the key path to promote MGBA from basic discovery to clinical translation [86].
This study has several limitations. First, BIGHI is currently in a single-center development phase with relatively concentrated sample sources, which may affect the external generalizability of results. Future efforts will gradually expand to multi-center collaboration to enhance geographic and population representativeness. Second, influenced by clinical visit patterns and disease spectrum distribution, sample sizes remain imbalanced across diagnostic categories, limiting statistical power for cross-disease comparisons. Additionally, low follow-up compliance among psychiatric patients means some longitudinal data are still being accumulated, preventing a more systematic analysis of disease progression dynamics in the current study. Although multimodal clinical and biological data have been collected, the cohort has not yet incorporated host genomic information, making it impossible to systematically evaluate the interaction mechanisms between genetic risk and environmental factors. Future integration of whole-genome sequencing and multi-omics data will facilitate the construction of a more comprehensive “host genome–microbiome–brain network–symptoms” mechanistic model. As the cohort expands across multiple centers and follow-up data matures, it will increasingly realize its potential for mechanistic elucidation and clinical translation in MGBA research on psychiatric disorders.
1.
Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, Shackelford KA, Tsoi D, Kievlan DR, Colombara DV, Ikuta KS, Kissoon N, Finfer S. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: Analysis for the global burden of disease study. Lancet. 2020;395(10219):200–211.
2.
Hu S, Mueller I, Yao H, Wang Y, Pan L, Cao X, Ye P, Jin W, Lin Q. The disability-adjusted life years attributable to mental disorders and self-harm in China from 1990–2021: Findings from the global burden of disease study 2021. PLOS Ment Health. 2025;2(4):Article e0000146.
3.
Huang Y, Wang YU, Wang H, Liu Z, Yu X, Yan J, Yu Y, Kou C, Xu X, Lu J, et al.Prevalence of mental disorders in China: A cross-sectional epidemiological study. Lancet Psychiatry. 2019;6(3):211–224.
4.
Murray CJ. The global burden of disease study at 30 years. Nat Med. 2022;28(10):2019–2026.
5.
Liu J, Wang H, Li L. Rethinking the studies of diagnostic biomarkers for mental disorders. Meta-Radiol. 2025;3(1):Article 100135.
6.
Xu W, Xu Q, Luo P, Qu X, Guo D, Xie Z, Hang N, Kuang M, Chen E, Wang L, et al.Gut–brain–microbiome axis in the regulation of cancer immune escape and immunotherapy in tumors. Research. 2025;8:Article 0885.
7.
Zhu B, Gu Z, Hu H, Huang J, Zeng Z, Liang H, Yuan Z, Huang S, Qiu Y, Sun X-D, et al.Altered gut microbiota contributes to acute-respiratory-distress-syndrome-related depression through microglial neuroinflammation. Research. 2025;8:Article 0636.
8.
Tang Y, Cai Q, Tian Z, Chen W, Tang H. Crosstalk between gut microbiota and cancer immunotherapy: Present investigations and future perspective. Research. 2025;8:Article 0600.
9.
Cryan JF, O’Riordan KJ, Cowan CSM, Sandhu KV, Bastiaanssen TFS, Boehme M, Codagnone MG, Cussotto S, Fulling C, Golubeva AV, et al.The microbiota-gut-brain axis. Physiol Rev. 2019;99(4):1877–2013.
10.
Cryan JF, Dinan TG. Mind-altering microorganisms: The impact of the gut microbiota on brain and behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012;13(10):701–712.
11.
Morais LH, Schreiber HL IV, Mazmanian SK. The gut microbiota–brain axis in behaviour and brain disorders. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021;19(4):241–255.
12.
Wang R, Sun S, Zhang Q, Wu G, Ren F, Chen J. Maternal milk orchestrates the development of infant gut microbiota: Implications for health and future research directions. Research. 2025;8:Article 0558.
13.
Jiang C, Liu H, Zhang Y. Oral hydrogels that balance microbiome for tumor treatment. Research. 2024;7:Article 0494.
14.
Bonder MJ, Kurilshikov A, Tigchelaar EF, Mujagic Z, Imhann F, Vila AV, Deelen P, Vatanen T, Schirmer M, Smeekens SP, et al.The effect of host genetics on the gut microbiome. Nat Genet. 2016;48(11):1407–1412.
15.
Kurilshikov A, Medina-Gomez C, Bacigalupe R, Radjabzadeh D, Wang J, Demirkan A, Le Roy CI, Raygoza Garay JA, Finnicum CT, Liu X, et al.Large-scale association analyses identify host factors influencing human gut microbiome composition. Nat Genet. 2021;53(2):156–165.
16.
Zheng P, Zeng B, Liu M, Chen J, Pan J, Han Y, Liu Y, Cheng K, Zhou C, Wang H. The gut microbiome from patients with schizophrenia modulates the glutamate-glutamine-GABA cycle and schizophrenia-relevant behaviors in mice. Sci Adv. 2019;5(2):Article eaau8317.
17.
Hu S, Li A, Huang T, Lai J, Li J, Sublette ME, Lu H, Lu Q, Du Y, Hu Z. Gut microbiota changes in patients with bipolar depression. Adv Sci. 2019;6(14):Article 1900752.
18.
Pearson-Leary J, Zhao C, Bittinger K, Eacret D, Luz S, Vigderman AS, Dayanim G, Bhatnagar S. The gut microbiome regulates the increases in depressive-type behaviors and in inflammatory processes in the ventral hippocampus of stress vulnerable rats. Mol Psychiatry. 2020;25(5):1068–1079.
19.
Wu Y, Cao H, Baranova A, Huang H, Li S, Cai L, Rao S, Dai M, Xie M, Dou Y. Multi-trait analysis for genome-wide association study of five psychiatric disorders. Transl Psychiatry. 2020;10(1):Article 209.
20.
Fernandez-Real J-M, Serino M, Blasco G, Puig J, Daunis-i-Estadella J, Ricart W, Burcelin R, Fernández-Aranda F, Portero-Otin M. Gut microbiota interacts with brain microstructure and function. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(12):4505–4513.
21.
Bastiaanssen TF, Cryan JF. The microbiota-gut-brain axis in mental health and medication response: Parsing directionality and causality. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2021;24(3):216–220.
22.
Gacesa R, Kurilshikov A, Vich Vila A, Sinha T, Klaassen MA, Bolte LA, Andreu-Sánchez S, Chen L, Collij V, Hu S, et al.Environmental factors shaping the gut microbiome in a Dutch population. Nature. 2022;604(7907):732–739.
23.
Chen X, Lu B, Li H-X, Li X-Y, Wang Y-W, Castellanos FX, Cao L-P, Chen N-X, Chen W, Cheng Y-Q, et al.The DIRECT consortium and the REST-meta-MDD project: Towards neuroimaging biomarkers of major depressive disorder. Psychoradiology. 2022;2(1):32–42.
24.
Zhou D, Zhou Y, Sun Z, Ji F, Zhang D, Wang Q, Ruan Y, Wang Y, Zhu Y, Sun X, et al.The China brain multi-omics atlas project (CBMAP). Mol Psychiatry. 2026;31(1):591–598.
25.
Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960;23(1):56–62.
26.
Maier W, Buller R, Philipp M, Heuser I. The Hamilton anxiety scale: Reliability, validity and sensitivity to change in anxiety and depressive disorders. J Affect Disord. 1988;14(1):61–68.
27.
Young RC, Biggs JT, Ziegler VE, Meyer DA. A rating scale for mania: Reliability, validity and sensitivity. Br J Psychiatry. 1978;133(5):429–435.
28.
Kay SR, Fiszbein A, Opler LA. The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1987;13(2):261–276.
29.
Shi C, Kang L, Yao S, Ma Y, Li T, Liang Y, Cheng Z, Xu Y, Shi J, Xu X, et al.The MATRICS consensus cognitive battery (MCCB): Co-norming and standardization in China. Schizophr Res. 2015;169(1–3):Article 109.
30.
Pan Z, Xiong D, Xiao H, Li J, Huang Y, Zhou J, Chen J, Li X, Ning Y, Wu F. The effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with chronic schizophrenia: Insights from EEG microstates. Psychiatry Res. 2021;299:Article 113866.
31.
Huang Y, Yi Y, Chen Q, Li H, Feng S, Zhou S, Zhang Z, Liu C, Li J, Lu Q, et al.Analysis of EEG features and study of automatic classification in first-episode and drug-naïve patients with major depressive disorder. BMC Psychiatry. 2023;23(1):832.
32.
Li J, Xiong D, Gao C, Huang Y, Li Z, Zhou J, Ning Y, Wu F, Wu K. Individualized spectral features in first-episode and drug-naïve major depressive disorder: Insights from periodic and aperiodic electroencephalography analysis. Biol Psychiatry: Cognit Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2025;10(6):574–586.
33.
Zhang Z, Li H, Huang Y, He Y, Yi Y, Feng S, Zhang Z, Liu C, Li J, Lin S, et al.A potential biomarker of varying severity in patients with first-episode drug-naïve depressive disorder: Evidence from the alteration of EEG microstates. J Affect Disord. 2026;394:Article 120489.
34.
He Y, Wu F, Zhang Z, Yi Y, Feng S, Lin K, Xu W, Li H, Wu K, Lam MF, et al.Association between EEG microstate and cognitive function in depressed patients with and without suicidal ideation. BMC Psychiatry. 2025;26:Article 60.
35.
Feng S, Huang Y, Lu H, Li H, Zhou S, Lu H, Feng Y, Ning Y, Han W, Chang Q. Association between degree centrality and neurocognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia: A longitudinal Rs-fMRI study. J Psychiatr Res. 2024;173:115–123.
36.
Kong L, Huang Y, Lei B, Ke P, Li H, Zhou J, Xiong D, Li G, Chen J, Li X. Divergent alterations of structural–functional connectivity couplings in first-episode and chronic schizophrenia patients. Neuroscience. 2021;460:1–12.
37.
Feng S, Huang Y, Li H, Zhou S, Ning Y, Han W, Zhang Z, Liu C, Li J, Zhong L. Dynamic effective connectivity in the cerebellar dorsal dentate nucleus and the cerebrum, cognitive impairment, and clinical correlates in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2024;271:394–401.
38.
Chen X, Zhou J, Ke P, Huang J, Xiong D, Huang Y, Ma G, Ning Y, Wu F, Wu K. Classification of schizophrenia patients using a graph convolutional network: A combined functional MRI and connectomics analysis. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2023;80:Article 104293.
39.
Zang J, Huang Y, Kong L, Lei B, Ke P, Li H, Zhou J, Xiong D, Li G, Chen J. Effects of brain atlases and machine learning methods on the discrimination of schizophrenia patients: A multimodal MRI study. Front Neurosci. 2021;15:Article 697168.
40.
Lu X, Yang Y, Wu F, Gao M, Xu Y, Zhang Y, Yao Y, Du X, Li C, Wu L. Discriminative analysis of schizophrenia using support vector machine and recursive feature elimination on structural MRI images. Medicine. 2016;95(30):Article e3973.
41.
Guo H, Jian S, Zhou Y, Chen X, Chen J, Zhou J, Huang Y, Ma G, Li X, Ning Y, et al.Discriminative analysis of schizophrenia patients using an integrated model combining 3D CNN with 2D CNN: A multimodal MR image and connectomics analysis. Brain Res Bull. 2024;206:Article 110846.
42.
Feng S, Zhou S, Huang Y, Peng R, Han R, Li H, Yi Y, Feng Y, Ning Y, Han W. Correlation between low frequency fluctuation and cognitive performance in bipolar disorder patients with suicidal ideation. J Affect Disord. 2024;344:628–634.
43.
Huang Y, Zhou S, Feng S, Li H, Zhang Z, Liu C, Li J, Han W, Wu K, Huang X. Differential relationships among homocysteine levels, cognitive deficits, and low-frequency fluctuation in brain activity in bipolar disorder with suicidal ideation. BMC Psychiatry. 2025;25(1):Article 514.
44.
Li W, Hu Z, Wang C, Lan X, Zhang M, Zhang F, You Z, Ye Y, Liu H, Luo Z. Altered reward circuit function moderates the relationship between childhood maltreatment and depression severity in adolescents. Depress Anxiety. 2023;2023(1):Article 4084004.
45.
Guo M, Zhang H, Huang Y, Diao Y, Wang W, Li Z, Feng S, Zhou J, Ning Y, Wu F, et al.Transcriptional patterns of nodal entropy abnormalities in major depressive disorder patients with and without suicidal ideation. Research. 2025;8:Article 0659.
46.
Li S, Zhuo M, Huang X, Huang Y, Zhou J, Xiong D, Li J, Liu Y, Pan Z, Li H, et al.Altered gut microbiota associated with symptom severity in schizophrenia. PeerJ. 2020;8:Article e9574.
47.
Li H, Huang Y, Liang L, Li H, Li S, Feng Y, Feng S, Wu K, Wu F. The relationship between the gut microbiota and oxidative stress in the cognitive function of schizophrenia: A pilot study in China. Schizophr Res. 2024;267:444–450.
48.
Li H, Li H, Zhu Z, Xiong X, Huang Y, Feng Y, Li Z, Wu K, Wu F. Association of serum homocysteine levels with intestinal flora and cognitive function in schizophrenia. J Psychiatr Res. 2023;159:258–265.
49.
Zhu B, Liang L, Huang Y, Wang H, Zhou J, Xiong D, Li S, Li H, Li X, Chen S, et al.Exploring the relationship between the gut microbiota and cognitive function in schizophrenia patients with distinct weights. Schizophr Res. 2025;280:103–113.
50.
Zhu B, Liang L, Chen S, Li H, Huang Y, Wang W, Zhang H, Zhou J, Xiong D, Li X, et al.Multi-kingdom microbial changes and their associations with the clinical characteristics in schizophrenia patients. Transl Psychiatry. 2025;15(1):Article 228.
51.
Li S, Song J, Ke P, Kong L, Lei B, Zhou J, Huang Y, Li H, Li G, Chen J, et al.The gut microbiome is associated with brain structure and function in schizophrenia. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):Article 9743.
52.
Liang L, Li S, Huang Y, Zhou J, Xiong D, Li S, Li H, Zhu B, Li X, Ning Y, et al.Relationships among the gut microbiome, brain networks, and symptom severity in schizophrenia patients: A mediation analysis. Neuroimage Clin. 2024;41:Article 103567.
53.
Peng R, Wang W, Liang L, Han R, Li Y, Wang H, Wang Y, Li W, Feng S, Zhou J, et al.The brain-gut microbiota network (BGMN) is correlated with symptom severity and Neurocognition in patients with schizophrenia. NeuroImage. 2025;308:Article 121052.
54.
Wang H, Peng R, Huang Y, Liang L, Wang W, Zhu B, Gao C, Guo M, Zhou J, Li H, et al.MO-GCN: A multi-omics graph convolutional network for discriminative analysis of schizophrenia. Brain Res Bull. 2025;221:Article 111199.
55.
Wang Y, Feng S, Huang Y, Peng R, Liang L, Wang W, Guo M, Zhu B, Zhang H, Liao J, et al.Revealing multiple biological subtypes of schizophrenia through a data-driven approach. J Transl Med. 2025;23(1):Article 505.
56.
Han R, Wang W, Liao J, Peng R, Liang L, Li W, Feng S, Huang Y, Fong LM, Zhou J, et al.Biological age prediction in schizophrenia using brain MRI, gut microbiome and blood data. Brain Res Bull. 2025;226:Article 111363.
57.
Ke P, Xiong D, Li J, Pan Z, Zhou J, Li S, Song J, Chen X, Li G, Chen J, et al.An integrated machine learning framework for a discriminative analysis of schizophrenia using multi-biological data. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):Article 14636.
58.
Huang Y, Li H, Zhu B, Feng S, Liu C, Zhang Z, Ning Y, Wu K, Wu F. The association between gut microbiota and functional connectivity in cognitive impairment of first-episode major depressive disorder. Transl Psychiatry. 2025;15(1):Article 449.
59.
Sathyanarayanan A, Mueller TT, Moni MA, Schueler K, Baune BT, Lio P, Mehta D, Baune BT, Dierssen M, Ebert B. Multi-omics data integration methods and their applications in psychiatric disorders. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2023;69:26–46.
60.
Tang X, Fang M, Cheng R, Niu J, Huang X, Xu K, Wang G, Sun Y, Liao Z, Zhang Z, et al.Transferrin is up-regulated by microbes and acts as a negative regulator of immunity to induce intestinal immunotolerance. Research. 2024;7:Article 0301.
61.
Liao M, Cai J, Zhu F, Lan Y, Xu T, Guo J, Xue Q, Wen Y, Zou F, Zhang Y, et al.Meta-transcriptomics reveals dysbiosis of the respiratory microbiome in older adults with long COVID. Research. 2025;8:Article 0720.
62.
Rothschild D, Weissbrod O, Barkan E, Kurilshikov A, Korem T, Zeevi D, Costea PI, Godneva A, Kalka IN, Bar N, et al.Environment dominates over host genetics in shaping human gut microbiota. Nature. 2018;555(7695):210–215.
63.
Wu D, Wang H, Ni Y, Lu Y, Wang Y, Li H, Chen L. Decoding the gut–brain axis: Toward AI-driven integration of neuroimaging and gut microbiota in human health. Vis Comput. 2025;41(12):9793–9804.
64.
Lim LWK. A micro review on the role of recently emerged artificial intelligence (AI) tools and algorithms in microbiome-gut-brain-axis associated disease therapy via psychobiotics. Precis Med. 2025;2(3):Article 100039.
65.
Porcari S, Ng SC, Zitvogel L, Sokol H, Weersma RK, Elinav E, Gasbarrini A, Cammarota G, Tilg H, Ianiro G. The microbiome for clinicians. Cell. 2025;188(11):2836–2844.
66.
Aglinskas A, Hartshorne JK, Anzellotti S. Contrastive machine learning reveals the structure of neuroanatomical variation within autism. Science. 2022;376(6597):1070–1074.
67.
Zhu H, Tong X, Carlisle NB, Xie H, Keller CJ, Oathes DJ, Liu F, Nemeroff CB, Fonzo GA, Zhang Y. Contrastive functional connectivity defines neurophysiology-informed symptom dimensions in major depression. Cell Rep Med. 2025;6(6):Article 102151.
68.
Yang J, Liu Z, Pan Y, Fan Z, Cheng Y, Wang F, Sun F, Wu G, Ouyang X, Tao H, et al.Regional neural functional efficiency across schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder: A transdiagnostic resting-state fMRI study. Psychol Med. 2024;54(15):4083–4094.
69.
McGuinness AJ, Davis JA, Dawson SL, Loughman A, Collier F, O’Hely M, Simpson CA, Green J, Marx W, Hair C, et al.A systematic review of gut microbiota composition in observational studies of major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatry. 2022;27(4):1920–1935.
70.
Krčmář L, Jäger I, Boudriot E, Hanken K, Gabriel V, Melcher J, Klimas N, Dengl F, Schmoelz S, Pingen P, et al.The multimodal Munich clinical deep phenotyping study to bridge the translational gap in severe mental illness treatment research. Front Psych. 2023;14:Article 1179811.
71.
Lai W, Deng W, Xu S, Zhao J, Xu D, Liu Y, Guo Y, Wang M, He F, Ye S, et al.Shotgun metagenomics reveals both taxonomic and tryptophan pathway differences of gut microbiota in major depressive disorder patients. Psychol Med. 2021;51(1):90–101.
72.
Ma Z, Zuo T, Frey N, Rangrez AY. A systematic framework for understanding the microbiome in human health and disease: From basic principles to clinical translation. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024;9(1):Article 237.
73.
Taylor JJ, Lin C, Talmasov D, Ferguson MA, Schaper FLWVJ, Jiang J, Goodkind M, Grafman J, Etkin A, Siddiqi SH, et al.A transdiagnostic network for psychiatric illness derived from atrophy and lesions. Nat Hum Behav. 2023;7(3):420–429.
74.
Liu L, Helal SE, Peng N. CRISPR-Cas-based engineering of probiotics. Biodes Res. 2023;5:Article 0017.
75.
Jin K, Chen B, Han S, Dong J, Cheng S, Qin B, Lu J. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) improves cognitive impairment and intestinal microecological dysfunction induced by high-fat diet in rats. Research. 2024;7:Article 0384.
76.
Zhang C, Zhao X, Zhang H, Wang T, Zhang Z, Yin Y, Wang H, Tong X, Xue Y, Zhou Y, et al.Gut microbiota modulation by lysozyme as a key regulator of vascular inflammatory aging. Research. 2025;8:Article 0704.
77.
Zhu F, Ju Y, Wang W, Wang Q, Guo R, Ma Q, Sun Q, Fan Y, Xie Y, Yang Z. Metagenome-wide association of gut microbiome features for schizophrenia. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):Article 1612.
78.
Zheng P, Zeng B, Zhou C, Liu M, Fang Z, Xu X, Zeng L, Chen J, Fan S, Du X, et al.Gut microbiome remodeling induces depressive-like behaviors through a pathway mediated by the host’s metabolism. Mol Psychiatry. 2016;21(6):786–796.
79.
Sarkar A, Lehto SM, Harty S, Dinan TG, Cryan JF, Burnet PW. Psychobiotics and the manipulation of bacteria–gut–brain signals. Trends Neurosci. 2016;39(11):763–781.
80.
Ait-Belgnaoui A, Colom A, Braniste V, Ramalho L, Marrot A, Cartier C, Houdeau E, Theodorou V, Tompkins T. Probiotic gut effect prevents the chronic psychological stress-induced brain activity abnormality in mice. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014;26(4):510–520.
81.
Fang X, Wang Y, Wei H, Huang Y. Precision microbiome: A new era of targeted therapy with core probiotics. Research. 2025;8:Article 0658.
82.
Cheng WY, Wu C-Y, Yu J. The role of gut microbiota in cancer treatment: Friend or foe? Gut. 2020;69(10):1867–1876.
83.
Li B, Xu M, Wang Y, Feng L, Xing H, Zhang K. Gut microbiota: A new target for traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of depression. J Ethnopharmacol. 2023;303:Article 116038.
84.
Diao Y, Huang Y, Zhu B, Guo M, Wang W, Li Z, Li W, Zhang H, Zhou J, Li X, et al.Heterogeneity-aware, multiscale annotation of shared and specific neurobiological signatures among major neurodevelopmental disorders. Research. 2026;9:1115.
85.
Zhong J, Zhu B, Zou Z, Li Y, Feng Y, Wu K, Hou X.Gut microbiota mediates the beneficial effects of exercise on autism-like behaviors. BMC Microbiol. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-025-04632-x
86.
Guo H, Xiao Y, Dong S, Yang J, Zhao P, Zhao T, Cai A, Tang L, Liu J, Wang H. Bridging animal models and humans: Neuroimaging as intermediate phenotypes linking genetic or stress factors to anhedonia. BMC Med. 2025;23(1):Article 38.
Year 2026 volume 9 Issue 3
PDF
152
79
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.34133/research.1142
  • Receive Date:2025-10-12
  • Online Date:2026-10-16
  • Published:2026-03-20
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-10-12
  • Revised:2026-01-22
  • Accepted:2026-01-22
Affiliations
    1Department of Psychiatry, The Affiliated Brain Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510370, China.
    2School of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou International Campus, Guangzhou 511442, China.
    3School of Materials Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.
    4Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center for Translational Medicine of Mental Disorders, Guangzhou 510370, China.
    5National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
    6Institute of Gerontology, Guangzhou Geriatric Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
    7Collaborative Innovation Center for Civil Affairs of Guangzhou, Guangzhou, China.
    8Department of Aging Research and Geriatric Medicine, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8575, Japan.

Corresponding:

* Address correspondence to: (F.W.);
* Address correspondence to: (Y.H.);
* Address correspondence to: (K.W.)
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/research/EN/10.34133/research.1142
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT