收藏切换
Discovery of Staircase Chirality through the Design of Unnatural Amino Acid Derivatives
收藏切换
PDF
Anis U. Rahman1, , Yu Wang1, , Ting Xu1, Kambham Devendra Reddy2, Shengzhou Jin1, Jasmine X. Yan2, Qingkai Yuan2, Daniel Unruh3, Ruibin Liang2, *, Guigen Li1, 2, *
Research. Vol 7 Article ID 0550
Less
收藏切换
Research. Vol 7 Article ID 0550
Research Article
Discovery of Staircase Chirality through the Design of Unnatural Amino Acid Derivatives
Full
Anis U. Rahman1, , Yu Wang1, , Ting Xu1, Kambham Devendra Reddy2, Shengzhou Jin1, Jasmine X. Yan2, Qingkai Yuan2, Daniel Unruh3, Ruibin Liang2, *, Guigen Li1, 2, *
Affiliations
  • 1School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China.
  • 2Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409-1061, USA.
  • 3Iowa Advanced Technology Laboratories, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Published: 2024-12-19 doi: 10.34133/research.0550
Outline
收藏切换

Chirality has garnered significant attention in the scientific community since its discovery by Louis Pasteur over a century ago. It has been showing a profound impact on chemical, biomedical, and materials sciences. Significant progress has been made in controlling molecular chirality, as evidenced by the several Nobel Prizes in chemistry awarded in this area, particularly for advancements in the asymmetric catalytic synthesis of molecules with central and axial chirality. However, the exploration of new types of chirality has been largely stagnant for more than half a century, likely due to the complexity and challenges inherent in this field. In this work, we present the discovery of a novel type of chirality—staircase chirality as inspired by the design and synthesis of unnatural amino acid derivatives. The architecture of staircase chirality is characterized by 2 symmetrical phenyl rings anchored by a naphthyl pier, with the rings asymmetrically displaced due to the influence of chiral auxiliaries at their para positions. This unique staircase chiral framework has been thoroughly characterized using spectroscopic techniques, with its absolute configuration definitively confirmed by x-ray diffraction analysis. Remarkably, one of the staircase molecules exhibits 4 distinct types of chirality: central, orientational, turbo, and staircase chirality, a combination that has not been previously documented in the literature. Computational studies using density functional theory (DFT) calculations were conducted to analyze the relative energies of individual staircase isomers, and the results are in agreement with our experimental findings. We believe that this discovery will open up a new research frontier in asymmetric synthesis and catalysis, with the potential to make a substantial impact on the fields of chemistry, medicine, and materials science.

Anis U. Rahman, Yu Wang, Ting Xu, Kambham Devendra Reddy, Shengzhou Jin, Jasmine X. Yan, Qingkai Yuan, Daniel Unruh, Ruibin Liang, Guigen Li. Discovery of Staircase Chirality through the Design of Unnatural Amino Acid Derivatives[J]. Research, 2024 , 7 (12) : 0550 . DOI: 10.34133/research.0550
Molecular chirality has long been recognized as closely tied to the origin of life on Earth, as essential biomolecules in animals and plants—such as DNA, RNA, proteins, peptides, and carbohydrates—possess chiral structural elements vital to biological processes [14]. Chirality manifests in diverse forms, ranging from microscopic organisms like helical bacteria to macroscopic objects like seashells [5]. The fascination with chirality, in both scientific and public communities, has thus been well-founded [6,7]. Over the past century, research on chirality has transformed the fields of biology, medicine, chemistry, and materials science [815]. In chemical sciences, significant progress has been made in controlling molecular chirality [1624] as evidenced by multiple Nobel Prize in chemistry awarded in recognition.
Molecular chirality is generally classified into several categories. At the small-molecule level, it includes central chirality [2535], axial chirality [3646], spiral chirality [16,36], sandwich chirality (metallic [47,48] and organo [4956]), turbo or propeller chirality[55], and orientational chirality [5659]. At the macro and polymeric molecular level, it encompasses multilayer chirality (rigid helical [13,60] and flexible folding [61,62]), as well as topological and inherent chirality [63,64]. Among these categories, orientational chirality is the most recent addition, defined by the C(sp2)–C(sp3) or C(sp)–C(sp3) axis with remotely anchored blockers [5659]. The orientational model exhibits 3 major energy barriers, contrasting with the 6 found in classic Felkin-Ahn or Cram models. This new form of chirality was revealed through our study of multilayer chiral frameworks via asymmetric catalytic C–C bond formation (Fig. 1) [49].
X-ray diffraction of the multilayer framework displays orientational and turbo chiral patterns through 3 propellers (Fig. 2) [49]. Specifically, aromatic–aromatic interactions differentiate the 2 phenyl groups on the P=O moiety and produce a turbo chiral pattern, with 3 aromatic rings surrounding the P=O axis. The bridge between the 2 piers is a non-symmetrical benzo[c][1,2,5]thiadiazole ring, which also acts as a significant asymmetric factor. When we attempted to explore new chiral architectures by replacing the benzo[c][1,2,5]thiadiazole ring with a symmetric phenyl ring, the asymmetric catalytic C–C bond formation was unsuccessful, resulting in minimal product formation under various conditions. Shifting focus, we investigated simpler 2-layer frameworks attached to chiral amide auxiliaries. We discovered that 2 phenyl rings on the naphthyl pier could be arranged asymmetrically, leading to the identification of a new chirality pattern, which we are provisionally calling “staircase chirality”. This chirality is illustrated in Fig. 2, featuring 2 symmetrical layers that slip in opposite directions. Two functional groups, represented by 2 spheres, may be identical or different. In this report, we present our preliminary findings on this novel chirality element.
In the initial phase, chiral amino acids were selected as the 2 auxiliaries at the para positions of the phenyl rings due to their potential for use in peptide drug design and synthesis [8,9]. Another key factor in this choice was the likelihood of obtaining high-quality crystals suitable for x-ray diffraction analysis, which is critical for this project as the slipped isomeric structures are challenging to distinguish by other analytical methods. To assemble the first framework (Fig. 3), (S)-ethyl L-leucinate hydrochloride was protected with 4-bromobenzoyl chloride, yielding the precursor ethyl (4-bromobenzoyl)-(S)-leucinate (1). This precursor was then converted to ethyl (4-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)benzoyl)-D-leucinate (2) via a coupling reaction involving bis(pinacolato)diboron, using Pd(dppf)Cl₂ as a catalyst and potassium acetate. The resulting building block (2) was coupled with 1,8-dibromonaphthalene through a slightly modified Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling reaction, using Pd(PPh₃)₄ as a catalyst and K₂CO₃ as a base in a THF/H₂O (6:1, v/v) co-solvent system. The final product, ethyl (4-(8-(4-(((R)-1-ethoxy-4-methyl-1-oxopentan-2-yl)carbamoyl)phenyl)naphthalen-1-yl)benzoyl)-L-leucinate (3), was obtained with an overall chemical yield of 36% from the starting material (1).
As anticipated, the product formed high-quality crystals, enabling x-ray diffraction analysis. As shown in Fig. 4, its x-ray structure reveals 2 co-existing diastereomers, each displaying 2 types of chirality: central chirality and staircase chirality. The 2 symmetrical phenyl rings exhibit asymmetric slippage; when the naphthyl anchor is positioned as shown in Fig. 4, the top phenyl ring slips either to the right (Fig. 4A) or to the left (Fig. 4B). Since there is no established nomenclature for this new form of chirality, we propose a provisional naming system as follows: (a) Observe the “stairs” from the naphthyl anchor to the other end of the phenyl ring, which is attached to the auxiliaries. (b) Imagine climbing the stairs from the bottom to the top. (c) The P-configuration is assigned to rightward climbing, while the M-configuration is assigned to leftward climbing. Based on this temporary system, isomers a and b would be classified as P- and M-configurations, respectively. Thus, the full names of these diastereomers are P- and M-diethyl 2,2′-((4,4′-(naphthalene-1,8-diyl)bis(benzoyl))bis(azanediyl))(2S,2′S)-bis(4-methylpentanoate), respectively.
Although the same chiral central auxiliaries are attached to the para-positions of the 2 phenyl rings, their functional group orientations differ noticeably. Additionally, the carbonyl groups on the 2 phenyl rings are arranged differently. In the M- and P-isomers, the C=O groups are oriented clockwise and counterclockwise, respectively, opposite to the rotation of their parent phenyl rings. These 2 factors likely contribute to the slipped staircase chirality observed. Interestingly, the 2 isobutyl groups in the M-isomer face the same direction, while those in the P-isomer face opposite directions, with a remote CH–CH₂ bond angle of approximately 85°. In both (S)-leucine residues of these 2 targets, a comparison of the 2 planar units of [C(O)NH] connected to the C(sp3) center of [CH(iBu)(CO₂Et)] shows that the M-isomer follows a Felkin-Ahn-type orientation. However, in the P-isomer, 2 distinct rotations occur between the [C(O)NH] and [CH(iBu)(CO₂Et)] units, where the C=O group is either aligned with or oriented away from the C*–H bond (where * indicates the chiral center). These conformational differences result in varying distances between the phenyl rings of the M- and P-diastereomers, measuring 4.041 and 4.192 Å, respectively, as determined from the centers of the phenyl rings.
Inspired by these initial results, we next explored the stereoselective formation of single staircase isomers, rather than a mixture of M- and P-diastereomers. We designed and synthesized a new staircase target containing (R)-valine amide and chiral sulfonimine-derived amine auxiliaries. The synthesis involved assembling 2 building blocks: methyl (4-(8-bromonaphthalen-1-yl)benzoyl)-(R)-valinate (7) and (S)-2-methyl-N-((S)-1-phenyl-1-(4-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)phenyl)butyl)propane-2-sulfinamide (10) (Fig. 5). The first building block (7), methyl (4-(8-bromonaphthalen-1-yl)benzoyl)-(R)-valinate, was synthesized in 3 steps: amide formation, Pd-catalyzed C-Bpin coupling [65], and Suzuki–Miyaura C–C coupling [66,67]. The second building block (10), (S)-N-((S)-1-(4-bromophenyl)-1-phenylbutyl)-2-methylpropane-2-sulfinamide, was also obtained through a 3-step process: aryl lithium formation, dehydration, and asymmetric carbonyl addition, with the absolute configuration of the chiral C(sp3) center assigned by following a similar asymmetric induction method reported in the literature [68,69]. The final step involved a Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling reaction between the 2 building blocks, yielding methyl (4-(8-(4-((S)-1-(((S)-tert-butylsulfinyl)amino)-1-phenylbutyl)phenyl)naphthalen-1-yl)benzoyl)-(R)-valinate (11), which formed crystalline structures suitable for x-ray diffraction analysis (Fig. 6).
As shown in Fig. 6, the 2 chiral auxiliaries were able to stereoselectively control the chirality of the staircase target (11) in the P-configuration. Notably, unlike the 2 isomers in Fig. 4, where the [C(=O)NH] scaffolds lie in the same plane as the phenyl ring as expected, in this case, the scaffold is distorted by about 30° away from the phenyl ring. This distortion is caused by repulsion between the 2 terminal auxiliary groups. The chiral carbon center connected to the scaffold does not follow the typical Felkin-Ahn model arrangement; instead, the planar scaffold is aligned along the C–H bond of the C(sp3) center. The steric effects of the 2 auxiliaries push the 2 phenyl plates to slip relative to each other, resulting in staircase chirality. The distance between the 2 phenyl rings, measured from their centers, is 3.952 Å, which is shorter than the distances observed in the 2 isomers shown in Fig. 4.
At the same time, these effects force the second alkyl (i-Pr) group and the N-t-Bu-sulfinyl group to move away from each other; this belongs to orientational chirality as recently established by our lab [5659]. Consequently, the present chiral target exhibits 3 types of chirality: central, orientational, and staircase chirality.
With this success on hand, we then turned our attention to the staircase target containing chiral tertiary amino acid and (R)- or (S)-1-phenylethan-1-amine auxiliaries; the latter auxiliary has been proven to be efficient on controlling orientational chirality [3942]. The synthesis of the first building block (15) was started from commercially available 4-bromobenzoic acid, which was subjected to the treatment with oxalyl dichloride to give 4-bromobenzoyl chloride (12) (Fig. 7). This step was followed by nucleophilic reaction of (12) with (R)-1-phenylethan-1-amine to give (R)-4-bromo-N-(1-phenylethyl)benzamide (13) [57]. (R)-N-(1-phenylethyl)-4-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)benzamide (14) was obtained by treating with B2Pin2 in the presence of PdCl2(dppf) as the catalyst and KOAc as an additive in 1,4-dioxane. The synthesis of the first building block (15), (R)-4-(8-bromonaphthalen-1-yl)-N-(1-phenylethyl)benzamide, was performed by conducting Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling. The synthesis of the second building block (18) was started from dehydration of isopropyl 2-oxo-2-phenylacetate with (R)-2-methylpropane-2-sulfinamide by using Ti(OEt)4 in dry THF at 75 °C to room temperature. 1,4-Dibromobenzene was converted into (4-bromophenyl)lithium precursor via the treatment with n-BuLi in THF, which was followed by the treatment with isopropyl (S,E)-2-((tert-butylsulfinyl)imino)-2-phenylacetate (16) to give isopropyl (R)-2-(4-bromophenyl)-2-(((S)-tert-butylsulfinyl)amino)-2-phenylacetate (17); it was then transformed into its BPin derivative, isopropyl (R)-2-(((S)-tert-butylsulfinyl)amino)-2-phenyl-2-(4-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)phenyl)acetate (18) by reacting with B2Pin2 under the above catalytic system involving PdCl2(dppf) and KOAc. The assembly of 2 key building blocks 15 and 18 was furnished by performing Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling to afford target 19, isopropyl (R)-2-(((R)-tert-butylsulfinyl)amino)-2-phenyl-2-(4-(8-(4-(((R)-1-phenylethyl)carbamoyl)phenyl)naphthalen-1-yl)phenyl)acetate.
Since (R)- or (S)-1-phenylethan-1-amine auxiliary was found to predominantly control previous orientational chirality as aforementioned, we also designed and synthesized isopropyl (R)-2-(((R)-tert-butylsulfinyl)amino)-2-phenyl-2-(4-(8-(4-(((S)-1-phenylethyl)carbamoyl)phenyl)naphthalen-1-yl)phenyl)acetate, i.e., to change (R)-4-N-(1-phenylethyl)amide to its (S)-counterpart while the sulfinamide and chiral carbon center are retained on the other side. The synthetic procedures for these 2 targets are the same as for those of target 20 in which only (S)-4-N-(1-phenylethyl)amide auxiliary was employed to replace its (R)-counterpart.
Figure 8 displays absolute assignments based on x-ray diffraction analysis for staircase isomers 19 and 20. Chiral tertiary amino acid auxiliaries of these 2 targets are the same involving (R)-carbon and (R)-sulfur chiral centers, but their 1-phenylethan-1-amine auxiliaries are different; i.e., targets 19 and 20 contain (R)- and (S)-1-phenylethan-1-amine-derived amides, respectively. (R)-1-Phenylethan-1-amine auxiliary was found to give P-staircase isomer, whereas its (S)-counterpart was found to give M-staircase isomer, which is similar to orientation chirality control in our previous work [3942]. Obviously, the present staircase chirality is predominantly controlled by chiral amide auxiliary without being affected by chiral centers of C*(sp3) and S*(=O)tBu of sulfinamide auxiliary.
In P-target 19, the scaffold of [C(=O)NH] is placed in the same plane of phenyl ring as anticipated. However, in M-target 20, this scaffold is distorted about 30° away from the phenyl ring due to the repulsion by 2 terminal auxiliary groups, which is like the situation observed in target 11 as shown in Fig. 6. In P-target 19, the Felkin–Anh model fits both [C(=O)NH] scaffold and N-sulfinyl amino carbon centers, but in M-target 20, the Felkin–Anh model only fits N-sulfinyl amino carbon center while the [C(=O)NH] scaffold is arranged nearly as long as the C–H bond of the chiral carbon. Obviously, the remote steric effects of these 2 auxiliaries are responsible for the present stereochemical arrangements. The distances between 2 centers of phenyl rings were measured to be 3.747 Å for P-target 19 and 3.473 Å for M-target 20, respectively. Interestingly, the orientational chirality of 3 functional groups on tertiary carbon of P isomer 19 and M-isomer 20 is different, i.e., N-sulfinyl amino group is pushed away from (R)-amide auxiliary in the former, but the phenyl group is away from the (S)-amide auxiliary in the latter. Very interestingly, M-isomer 20 displays an obvious C(sp3)-centered turbo chirality by 3 propellers in M,M,M-configuration. However, there is no such structural arrangement in P-isomer 19. Therefore, M-isomer 20 contains 4 types of chirality elements: central, orientational, turbo, and staircase chirality, which has not been documented in literature yet.
It should be noted that previous multilayer or organo sandwich frameworks contain non-symmetrical aromatic ring. However, the present staircase structures require the rings on 1,8-positions of naphthalene to be symmetrical. The current approach using staircase chirality will be applied to the design of unnatural amino acids for research on peptides and peptidomimetics, specifically by synthesizing individual M- and P-isomers. This approach could yield preferred conformations that better target macro biological molecules, such as receptors on cell surfaces, leading to peptide drug candidates with enhanced biomedical activity and fewer side and unwanted effects. In parallel, circularly polarized luminescent multilayer polymers and materials based on staircase chirality units offer promising research avenues through interdisciplinary collaboration. Adjusting distances between aromatic rings and functional groups on phenyl and naphthyl rings is expected to influence absorption and emission wavelengths of multilayer materials. Preliminary results in our lab indicate that multilayer polymers and their oligomers exhibit fluorescence in both solution and solid forms, demonstrating the potential of staircase chirality for practical applications.
We performed quantum mechanical calculations using density functional theory (DFT) to evaluate the energies of a single molecule that is a derivative of 20 in the vacuum, together with its stereoisomers with different types of center and staircase chirality. It is observed that in the crystal structure, the -NH moiety on the amide group is involved in the intermolecular hydrogen bonds across neighboring cells, which is absent in the calculations performed here for an isolated molecule in the vacuum. For this reason, the -NH moiety on the amide group was replaced with the -NCH3 moiety to simplify the energy comparison among different stereoisomers. All calculations in this study were performed for this derivative.
The structure of the (S,R,R)-(M) isomer (see Fig. 9 for definition) was constructed using the corresponding crystal structure of molecule 20 by replacing the NH moiety with the -NCH3 moiety. The structure of the (R,R,R)-(M) isomer was constructed from the (S,R,R)-(M) isomer by inverting the chirality of the carbon atom connected to the NCH3 moiety. The structure of the (S,R,R)-(P) isomer was constructed from the crystal structure of molecule 19 (the (R,R,R)-(P) isomer) by first replacing the -NH moiety with the -NCH3 moiety followed by inverting the chirality of the carbon atom connected to the -NCH3 moiety.
Following the generation of the initial structures of different isomers, their geometries were optimized using DFT with the B3LYP functional [7073], the def2-SVP basis set [74], and the D3 dispersion correction [75] (B3LYP-D3/def2-SVP). At the optimized geometries, the energies were re-evaluated using the def2-TZVP basis set plus D3 dispersion correction (B3LYP-D3/def2-TZVP). The normal mode analysis and zero-point energy (ZPE) corrections were performed on these minima at the B3LYP-D3/def2-SVP level of theory. The final energy reported for each optimized structure was the B3LYP-D3/def2-TZVP energy plus the ZPE correction.
All geometry optimizations were performed with the DL-FIND [76] plugin in the ChemShell [77] software package. All DFT calculations were performed with the TURBOMOLE [78] software package.
Our computational results revealed that by changing from the (S,R,R)-(M) isomer to the (R,R,R)-(M) isomer, the energy increases by 2.8 kcal/mol (Fig. 9). This result suggests that the staircase chirality influences the relative thermal stability of the chirality of the carbon atom adjacent to the -NCH3 group. Additionally, changing from the (S,R,R)-(M) isomer to the (S,R,R)-(P) isomer features the large displacements of the 2 torsions connecting the naphthalene ring and the 2 benzyl rings (φ1, φ2, Fig. 9), and an energy increase of 6.3 kcal/mol (Fig. 9). This result suggests that the chirality of the carbon atom adjacent to the -NCH3 group is correlated with the thermal stability of the staircase chirality: when this carbon atom adopts the S chirality, the M-staircase isomer is more stable. Thus, the calculations are consistent with the crystal structures of the original compound with the amide group and support the experimentally observed coupling between the staircase chirality and the center chirality.
We have discovered a novel chiral element—staircase chirality. Individual staircase isomers were selectively synthesized by simultaneously using 2 chiral auxiliaries: an amide and a sulfinamide. This chiral framework features 2 symmetrical phenyl rings bridged by a naphthyl core, with these phenyl rings asymmetrically displaced due to the chiral auxiliaries at their para positions. The resulting staircase chiral targets were fully characterized through spectroscopy, with their absolute configurations unambiguously confirmed by x-ray diffraction analysis. A nomenclature system was proposed for the staircase isomers, and one isomer was found to exhibit 4 distinct types of chirality elements: central, orientational, turbo, and staircase chirality—an unprecedented combination. Geometry optimizations using DFT were performed to assess the relative energies of the individual staircase isomers, aligning with our experiments. The present 2-layer unit will be utilized to build higher staircase oligomers and polymers. This discovery is expected to pave the way for new research in asymmetric synthesis and catalysis, with broad implications for the fields of chemistry, medicinal chemistry, and materials sciences.
Unless otherwise stated, all reactions were magnetically stirred and conducted in oven-dried glassware in anhydrous solvents under Ar, applying standard Schlenk techniques. Solvents and liquid reagents, as well as solutions of solid or liquid reagents were added via syringes, stainless steel, or polyethylene cannulas through rubber septa or through a weak Ar counter-flow. Solvents were removed under reduced pressure at 40 to 65 °C using a rotavapor. All given yields are isolated yields of chromatographic and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopic materials. All commercially available chemicals were used as received without further purification.
1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded in CDCl3 on 400-MHz instruments with TMS as internal standard. For referencing of the 1H NMR spectra, the residual solvent signal (δ = 7.26 parts per million [ppm] for CDCl3) was used. In the case of the 13C NMR spectra, the signal of solvent (δ = 77.0 ppm for CDCl3) was used. Chemical shifts (δ) were reported in ppm with respect to TMS. Data are represented as follows: chemical shift, multiplicity (s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, m = multiplet), coupling constant (J, Hz), and integration. Optical rotations were measured with a Rudolph Research Analytical APIV/2W Polarimeter at the indicated temperature with a sodium lamp. Measurements were performed in a 2-mL vessel with the concentration unit of g/100 mL in the corresponding solvents.
  • the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22071102, 91956110)
  • Welch Foundation (D-1361-20210327)
  • Welch Foundation (D-2108-20220331)
1.
Eliel EL, Wilen SH. Stereochemistry of organic compoundsNashville (TN): John Wiley & Sons; 1994.
2.
Wang AH-J, Fujii S, van Boom JH, Rich A. Right-handed and left-handed double-helical DNA: Structural studies. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1983;47(Pt 1):33–44.
3.
Krautwald S, Sarlah D, Schafroth MA, Carreira EM. Enantio- and diastereodivergent dual catalysis: Α-allylation of branched aldehydes. Science. 2013;340(6136):1065–1068.
4.
Bryliakov KP. Chemical mechanisms of prebiotic chirality amplification. Research. 2020;2020:5689246.
5.
Zhang J, Kürti L. Multi-layer 3D chirality: Its enantioselective synthesis and aggregation-induced emission. Natl Sci Rev. 2021;8(1):nwaa205.
6.
Wagner I, Musso H. New naturally occurring amino acids. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 1983;22(4185):816–828.
7.
Dunitz JD. Pauling's left-handed α-helix. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2001;40(22):4167–4173.
8.
Hruby VJ, Li G, Haskell-Luevano C, Shenderovich M. Design of peptides, proteins, and peptidomimetics in chi space. Biopolymers. 1997;43(3):219–266.
9.
Smith DA, Jones RM. The sulfonamide group as a structural alert: A distorted story? Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel. 2008;11(1):72–79.
10.
Tang X, Fang M, Cheng R, Niu J, Huang X, Xu K, Wang G, Sun Y, Liao Z, Zhang Z, et al. Transferrin is up-regulated by microbes and acts as a negative regulator of immunity to induce intestinal immunotolerance. Research. 2024;7:0301.
11.
Hu M, Feng H-T, Yuan Y-X, Zheng Y-S, Tang BZ. Chiral AIEgens—Chiral recognition, CPL materials and other chiral applications. Coord Chem Rev. 2020;416: Article 213329.
12.
Bao J, Liu N, Tian H, Wang Q, Cui T, Jiang W, Zhang S, Cao T. Chirality enhancement using Fabry–Pérot-like cavity. Research. 2020;2020:7873581.
13.
Shen Y, Chen C-F. Helicenes: Synthesis and applications. Chem Rev. 2012;112(3):1463–1535.
14.
Oki O, Kulkarni C, Yamagishi H, Meskers SCJ, Lin Z-H, Huang J-S, Meijer EW, Yamamoto Y. Robust angular anisotropy of circularly polarized luminescence from a single twisted-bipolar polymeric microsphere. J Am Chem Soc. 2021;143(23):8772–8779.
15.
Liu T-T, Yan Z-P, Hu J-J, Yuan L, Luo X-F, Tu Z-L, Zheng Y-X. Chiral thermally activated delayed fluorescence emitters-based efficient circularly polarized organic light-emitting diodes featuring low efficiency roll-off. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13(47):56413–56419.
16.
Zhou Q-L. Privileged chiral ligands and catalysts. Weinheim (Germany): Wiley-VCH Verlag; 2011.
17.
Wagen CC, McMinn SE, Kwan EE, Jacobsen EN. Screening for generality in asymmetric catalysis. Nature. 2022;610(7933):680–686.
18.
Garhwal S, Dong Y, Mai BK, Liu P, Buchwald SL. CuH-catalyzed regio- and enantioselective formal hydroformylation of vinyl arenes. J Am Chem Soc. 2024;146(20):13733–13740.
19.
Tsai C-C, Sandford C, Wu T, Chen B, Sigman MS, Toste FD. Enantioselective intramolecular allylic substitution via synergistic palladium/chiral phosphoric acid catalysis: Insight into stereoinduction through statistical modeling. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2020;59(34):14647–14655.
20.
Rouh H, Tang Y, Xu T, Yuan Q, Zhang S, Wang J-Y, Jin S, Wang Y, Pan J, Wood HL, et al. Aggregation-induced synthesis (AIS): Asymmetric synthesis via chiral aggregates. Research. 2022;2022:9865108.
21.
Tang Y, Wang Y, Yuan Q, Zhang S, Wang J-Y, Jin S, Xu T, Pan J, Surowiec K, Li G. Aggregation-induced catalysis: Asymmetric catalysis with chiral aggregates. Research. 2023;6:0163.
22.
Zhou J, Tang Y. The development and application of chiral trisoxazolines in asymmetric catalysis and molecular recognition. Chem Soc Rev. 2005;34(8):664.
23.
Cheng JK, Xiang S-H, Tan B. Organocatalytic enantioselective synthesis of axially chiral molecules: Development of strategies and skeletons. Acc Chem Res. 2022;55(20):2920–2937.
24.
Gu Q-S, Li Z-L, Liu X-Y. Copper(I)-catalyzed asymmetric reactions involving radicals. Acc Chem Res. 2020;53(1):170–181.
25.
Zhao P, Li Z, He J, Liu X, Feng X. Asymmetric catalytic 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of α-diazoesters for synthesis of 1-pyrazoline-based spirochromanones and beyond. Sci China Chem. 2021;64:1355–1360.
26.
Wright TB, Evans PA. Catalytic enantioselective alkylation of prochiral enolates. Chem Rev. 2021;121(15):9196–9242.
27.
Wang G, Zhang M, Guan Y, Zhang Y, Hong X, Wei C, Zheng P, Wei D, Fu Z, Chi YR, et al. Desymmetrization of cyclic 1,3-diketones under N-heterocyclic carbene organocatalysis: Access to organofluorines with multiple stereogenic centers. Research. 2021;2021:9867915.
28.
Zhang J, Huo X, Xiao J, Zhao L, Ma S, Zhang W. Enantio- and diastereodivergent construction of 1,3-nonadjacent stereocenters bearing axial and central chirality through synergistic Pd/Cu catalysis. J Am Chem Soc. 2021;143(32):12622–12632.
29.
Ping Y, Li Y, Zhu J, Kong W. Construction of quaternary stereocenters by palladium-catalyzed carbopalladation-initiated cascade reactions. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2019;58(6):1562–1573.
30.
Cai Y, Lv Y, Shu L, Jin Z, Chi YR, Li T. Access to axially chiral aryl aldehydes via carbene-catalyzed nitrile formation and desymmetrization reaction. Research. 2024;7:0293.
31.
Zhang R, Ge S, Sun J. SPHENOL, a new chiral framework for asymmetric synthesis. J Am Chem Soc. 2021;143(32):12445–12449.
32.
Zhang R, Wu Z, Yang S, Ma D. Asymmetric palladium-catalyzed dearomative intramolecular N-alkylation reaction: Enantioselective total synthesis of (−)-spiroquinazoline. Adv Synth Catal. 2023;365(12):1983–1988.
33.
Yang S, Rui K-H, Tang X-Y, Xu Q, Shi M. Rhodium/silver synergistic catalysis in highly enantioselective cycloisomerization/cross coupling of keto-vinylidenecyclopropanes with terminal alkynes. J Am Chem Soc. 2017;139(16):5957–5964.
34.
Zhang S, Li L, Li D, Zhou Y-Y, Tang Y. Catalytic regio- and enantioselective boracarboxylation of arylalkenes with CO2 and diboron. J Am Chem Soc. 2024;146(5):2888–2894.
35.
Liu D, Li B, Chen J, Gridnev ID, Yan D, Zhang W. Ni-catalyzed asymmetric hydrogenation of N-aryl imino esters for the efficient synthesis of chiral α-aryl glycines. Nat Commun. 2020;11:5935.
36.
Cao Z-Y, Wang X, Tan C, Zhao X-L, Zhou J, Ding K. Highly stereoselective olefin cyclopropanation of diazooxindoles catalyzed by a C2-symmetric spiroketal bisphosphine/Au(I) complex. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135(22):8197–8200.
37.
Ge Y, Qin C, Bai L, Hao J, Liu J, Luan X. A dearomatization/debromination strategy for the [4+1] spiroannulation of bromophenols with α,β-unsaturated imines. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2020;59(43):18985–18989.
38.
Wang Q, Zhang W-W, Zheng C, Gu Q, You S-L. Enantioselective synthesis of azoniahelicenes by Rh-catalyzed C–H annulation with alkynes. J Am Chem Soc. 2021;143(1):114–120.
39.
Reimann S, Adachi S, Subramanian H, Sibi MP. Enantioselective enolate protonations: Evaluation of achiral templates with fluxional brønsted basic substituents in conjugate addition of malononitriles. Tetrahedron. 2024;152: Article 133833.
40.
Wang Y-B, Tan B. Construction of axially chiral compounds via asymmetric organocatalysis. Acc Chem Res. 2018;51(2):534–547.
41.
Liao G, Yao Q-J, Zhang Z-Z, Wu Y-J, Huang D-Y, Shi B-F. Scalable, stereocontrolled formal syntheses of (+)-isoschizandrin and (+)-steganone: Development and applications of palladium(II)-catalyzed atroposelective C−H alkynylation. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2018;57(14):3661–3665.
42.
Liu Y, Li W, Zhang J. Chiral ligands designed in China. Natl Sci Rev. 2017;4(3):326–358.
43.
Ma X, Tan M, Li L, Zhong Z, Li P, Liang J, Song Q. Ni-catalysed assembly of axially chiral alkenes from alkynyl tetracoordinate borons via 1,3-metallate shift. Nat Chem. 2024;16(1):42–53.
44.
Ma C, Sheng F-T, Wang H-Q, Deng S, Zhang Y-C, Jiao Y, Tan W, Shi F. Atroposelective access to oxindole-based axially chiral styrenes via the strategy of catalytic kinetic resolution. J Am Chem Soc. 2020;142(37):15686–15696.
45.
Zhu W, Han C, Yang G, Huo X, Zhang W. Pd/Cu-cocatalyzed enantio- and diastereodivergent Wacker-type dicarbofunctionalization of unactivated alkenes. J Am Chem Soc. 2024;146(38):26121–26130.
46.
Dai L, Liu Y, Xu Q, Wang M, Zhu Q, Yu P, Zhong G, Zeng X. A dynamic kinetic resolution approach to axially chiral diaryl ethers by catalytic atroposelective transfer hydrogenation. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2023;62(7): Article e202216534.
47.
Dai L-X, Tu T, You S-L, Deng W-P, Hou X-L. Asymmetric catalysis with chiral ferrocene ligands. Acc Chem Res. 2003;36(9):659–667.
48.
Fu GC. Enantioselective nucleophilic catalysis with “planar-chiral” heterocycles. Acc Chem Res. 2000;33(6):412–420.
49.
Wu G, Liu Y, Rouh H, Ma L, Tang Y, Zhang S, Zhou P, Wang J-Y, Jin S, Unruh D, et al. Asymmetric catalytic approach to multilayer 3D chirality. Chem Eur J. 2021;27(30):8013–8020.
50.
Wu G, Liu Y, Yang Z, Katakam N, Rouh H, Ahmed S, Unruh D, Surowiec K, Li G. Multilayer 3D chirality and its synthetic assembly. Research. 2019;2019:6717104.
51.
Wu G, Liu Y, Yang Z, Jiang T, Katakam N, Rouh H, Ma L, Tang Y, Ahmed S, Rahman AU, et al. Enantioselective assembly of multi-layer 3D chirality. Natl Sci Rev. 2020;7(3):588–599.
52.
Liu Y, Wu G, Yang Z, Rouh H, Katakam N, Ahmed S, Unruh D, Cui Z, Lischka H, Li G. Multi-layer 3D chirality: New synthesis, AIE and computational studies. Sci China Chem. 2020;63:692–698.
53.
Jin S, Wang J-Y, Tang Y, Rouh H, Zhang S, Xu T, Wang Y, Yuan Q, Chen D, Unruh D, et al. Central-to-folding chirality control: Asymmetric synthesis of multilayer 3D targets with electron-deficient bridges. Front Chem. 2022;10: Article 860398.
54.
Tang Y, Wu G, Jin S, Liu Y, Ma L, Zhang S, Rouh H, Ali AIM, Wang J-Y, Xu T, et al. From center-to-multilayer chirality: Asymmetric synthesis of multilayer targets with electron-rich bridges. J Org Chem. 2022;87(9):5976–5986.
55.
Li G, Xu T, Wang Y, Jin S, Rahman AU, Yan X, Yuan Q, Liu H, Wang J-Y, Yan W, et al. Amino turbo chirality and its asymmetric control. Research. 2024;7:0474.
56.
Wang Y, Xu T, Jin S, Wang J-Y, Yuan Q, Liu H, Tang Y, Zhang S, Yan W, Jiao Y, et al. Design and asymmetric control of orientational chirality by using the combination of C(sp2)-C(sp) levers and achiral N-protecting group. Chem Eur J. 2024;30(20): Article e202400005.
57.
Jin S, Xu T, Tang Y, Wang J-Y, Wang Y, Pan J, Zhang S, Yuan Q, Rahman AU, Aquino AJA, et al. A new chiral phenomenon of orientational chirality, its synthetic control and computational study. Front Chem. 2023;10:1110240.
58.
Xu T, Wang J-Y, Wang Y, Jin S, Tang Y, Zhang S, Yuan Q, Liu H, Yan W, Jiao Y, et al. C(sp)-C(sp) lever-based targets of orientational chirality: Design and asymmetric synthesis. Molecules. 2024;29(10):2274.
59.
Jin S, Wang Y, Tang Y, Wang J-Y, Xu T, Pan J, Zhang S, Yuan Q, Rahman AU, et al. Orientational chirality, its asymmetric control, and computational study. Research. 2022;2022:0012.
60.
Shirakawa S, Liu S, Kaneko S. Organocatalyzed asymmetric synthesis of axially, planar, and helical chiral compounds. Chem Asian J. 2016;11:330–341.
61.
Wang J-Y, Tang Y, Wu G-Z, Zhang S, Rouh H, Jin S, Xu T, Wang Y, Unruh D, Surowiec K, et al. Asymmetric catalytic assembly of triple-columned and multilayered chiral folding polymers showing aggregation-induced emission (AIE). Chem Eur J. 2022;28(3): Article e202200183.
62.
Tang Y, Jin S, Zhang S, Wu G-Z, Wang J-Y, Xu T, Wang Y, Unruh D, Surowiec K, Ma Y, et al. Multilayer 3D chiral folding polymers and their asymmetric catalytic assembly. Research. 2022;2022:9847949.
63.
Wang Y, Gong J, Wang X, Li W-J, Wang X-Q, He X, Wang W, Yang H-B. Multistate circularly polarized luminescence switching through stimuli-induced co-conformation regulations of pyrene-functionalized topologically chiral [2]catenane. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2022;61(44): Article e202210542.
64.
Tong S, Li J-T, Liang D-D, Zhang Y-E, Feng Q-Y, Zhang X, Zhu J, Wang M-X. Catalytic enantioselective synthesis and switchable chiroptical property of inherently chiral macrocycles. J Am Chem Soc. 2020;142(34):14432–14436.
65.
Kumar A, Bawa S, Ganorkar K, Ghosh SK, Bandyopadhyay A. Synthesis and characterization of acid-responsive luminescent Fe(II) metallopolymers of rigid and flexible backbone N-donor multidentate conjugated ligands. Inorg Chem. 2020;59(3):1746–1757.
66.
Miyaura N, Suzuki A. Palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions of organoboron compounds. Chem Rev. 1995;95(7):2457–2483.
67.
Zhou Y, Zhang X, Liang H, Cao Z, Zhao X, He Y, Wang S, Pang J, Zhou Z, Ke Z, et al. Enantioselective synthesis of axially chiral biaryl monophosphine oxides via direct asymmetric Suzuki coupling and DFT investigations of the enantioselectivity. ACS Catal. 2014;4(5):1390–1397.
68.
Davis FA, Chen B-C. Asymmetric synthesis of amino acids using sulfinimines (thiooxime S-oxides). Chem Soc Rev. 1998;27(1):13–18.
69.
Robak MT, Herbage MA, Ellman JA. Synthesis and applications of tert-butanesulfinamide. Chem Rev. 2010;110(6):3600–3740.
70.
Becke AD. Density-functional exchange-energy approximation with correct asymptotic behavior. Phys Rev A Gen Phys. 1988;38(6):3098–3100.
71.
Lee C, Yang W, Parr RG. Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys Rev B Condens Matter. 1988;37(2):785–789.
72.
Becke AD. Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J Chem Phys. 1993;98:5648–5652.
73.
Becke AD. A new mixing of Hartree–Fock and local density-functional theories. J Chem Phys. 1993;98:1372–1377.
74.
Weigend F, Ahlrichs R. Balanced basis sets of split valence, triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for H to Rn: Design and assessment of accuracy. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2005;7(18):3297–3305.
75.
Grimme S, Antony J, Ehrlich S, Krieg H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J Chem Phys. 2010;132: Article 154104.
76.
Kästner J, Carr JM, Keal TW, Thiel W, Wander A, Sherwood P. DL-FIND: An open-source geometry optimizer for atomistic simulations. J Phys Chem A. 2009;113(15):11856–11865.
77.
Metz S, Kästner J, Sokol AA, Keal TW, Sherwood P. ChemShell—A modular software package for QM/MM simulations: ChemShell. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci. 2014;4(2):101–110.
78.
Balasubramani SG, Chen GP, Coriani S, Diedenhofen M, Frank MS, Franzke YJ, Furche F, Grotjahn R, Harding ME, Hättig C, et al. TURBOMOLE: Modular program suite for ab initio quantum-chemical and condensed-matter simulations. J Chem Phys. 2020;152(18): Article 184107.
Year 2024 volume 7 Issue 12
PDF
177
99
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.34133/research.0550
  • Receive Date:2024-10-05
  • Online Date:2025-07-24
  • Published:2024-12-19
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2024-10-05
  • Revised:2024-11-22
  • Accepted:2024-11-22
Funding
the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22071102, 91956110)
Welch Foundation (D-1361-20210327)
Welch Foundation (D-2108-20220331)
Affiliations
    1School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China.
    2Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409-1061, USA.
    3Iowa Advanced Technology Laboratories, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.

Corresponding:

* Address correspondence to: (R.L.); , (G.L.)
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/research/EN/10.34133/research.0550
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT