收藏切换
Noninvasive Novel Transdermal Drug Delivery System for Deep Drug Permeability
收藏切换
PDF
Huijie Han1, 2, *, Hélder A. Santos1, 2, 3, *
Research. Vol 7 Article ID 0504
Less
收藏切换
Research. Vol 7 Article ID 0504
Commentary
Noninvasive Novel Transdermal Drug Delivery System for Deep Drug Permeability
Full
Huijie Han1, 2, *, Hélder A. Santos1, 2, 3, *
Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Prevention and Treatment of Bone and Joint Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.
  • 2Department of Biomaterials and Biomedical Technology, The Personalized Medicine Research Institute (PRECISION), University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen Ant. Deusinglaan 1, Groningen 9713 AV, The Netherlands.
  • 3Drug Research Program, Division of Pharmaceutical Chemistry and Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki FI-00014, Finland.
Published: 2024-10-14 doi: 10.34133/research.0504
Outline
收藏切换
Huijie Han, Hélder A. Santos. Noninvasive Novel Transdermal Drug Delivery System for Deep Drug Permeability[J]. Research, 2024 , 7 (10) : 0504 . DOI: 10.34133/research.0504
Noninvasive drug delivery systems are well applied due to their safety, convenience, and patient compliance [1]. However, drug permeability in traditional noninvasive drug delivery systems is limited, and it is difficult to regulate the administration time and dosage [2]. The depth of drug permeability is mainly impeded by geometry obstruction and diffusional resistance of the stratum corneum, which consists of 10 to 30 layers of keratinized corneocytes embedded in an extracellular lipid matrix. It is a great challenge to overcome stratum corneum to enhance drug permeation across skin [3]. The latest publication in Advanced Materials from the teams of Cai, Cui, and Bai introduced a new type of nanobubble ultrasonic coupling hydrogel, which is built by dynamic Schiff base cross-linking between nanobubbles and aminated hyaluronic acid (HA) [4]. This ultrasound coupling hydrogel opens new insights in noninvasive drug delivery because it efficiently overcomes the skin barrier and achieves precise spatiotemporal drug delivery by ultrasound-amplified cavitation effect.
Transdermal drug delivery is one of the most common drug delivery systems and plays the leading role in noninvasive drug delivery [5]. It not only is noninvasive and convenient but also avoids the first-pass effect and increases drug bioavailability [5]. Currently, there are several chemical, physical, and biological methods for transdermal drug delivery [6]. Although there is some progress in chemical and biological methods, such as chemical absorption enhancers and biological mucosal adhesives, the ideal drug permeability accelerator is still in exploration [7,8] since drug absorption enhancers may damage epithelium mucosae, while mucosal adhesives show limited drug permeability efficiency [9]. As for physical transdermal drug delivery, the most common method is to destroy the skin barrier through subcutaneous injections, such as microneedles, but such a strategy has not achieved complete noninvasion and efficient drug permeability [10], and the drug permeability inefficiency is largely dependent on the length of the microneedles [11]. The drug delivery stated in the abovementioned approach has an important effect on drug toxicity, pharmacodynamics, and immunity. There is still a long way to go in optimizing the physical transdermal drug delivery for better drug permeability efficiency.
As the mechanical wave, ultrasound has been widely used in rehabilitation medicine, especially in soft tissue repair, nerve regeneration, and scar hyperplasia prevention [1214]. Ultrasound greatly promotes hydrophilic and hydrophobic drug permeability, including macromolecules like insulin [15], toxins from enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli [16], DNA [17], small interfering RNA [18], bovine serum albumin [19], etc. Furthermore, ultrasound enables constant or specific drug release in certain sites with precise drug dosages. However, ultrasound cannot be effectively transmitted in the air, so medical coupling agents act as a medium to reduce acoustic resistance and improve image quality [20]. Traditional coupling agents are usually liquid conductive media with low nanobubble content and lack mechanically responsive groups. Thus, the cavitation effects of drugs cannot be well enhanced, and the skin stratum corneum and basement membrane barriers cannot be overcome, leading to poor drug permeability efficiency [2123]. Therefore, there is an urgent need for a new type of ultrasound coupling agent to improve drug permeation and release.
Recently, the teams of Cai, Cui, and Bai reported a new type of nanobubble ultrasound coupling agent in Advanced Materials [4]. This type of coupling agent integrates ultrasonic real-time imaging and noninvasive deep drug permeation by overcoming double barriers of the skin. To achieve this, the ultrasound coupling agent crosslinked perfluorohexane-modified celecoxib-loaded poly(lactic-co-glycolic) (Cel-PLGA) acid nanobubbles with aldehyde HA and aminated HA hydrogel by Schiff base reaction (Figure). Celecoxib was successfully permeated into the dermis layers with 2.5-fold higher permeability efficiency. The long-term efficacy of the coupling agent was evaluated in the tendon adhesion rat model and demonstrated that celecoxib was successfully delivered in the gap between skin and tendon, reducing the adhesion degree after tendon injury. Biosafety and biocompatibility were evaluated in vitro by live-dead staining, skeletal staining, and cell viability of fibroblasts (F208), and the result indicated great biocompatibility of coupling agents without fibroblast toxicity in 5 d. In summary, unlike traditional coupling agents, the new type of coupling agent can efficiently transfer drugs through the double barrier of the skin by amplifying the cavitation effect of ultrasound, with a penetration depth of up to 728 μm in a noninvasive way.
Low-intensity ultrasound-based transdermal drug delivery has its unique advantages over traditional drug delivery due to its noninvasive and avoidance of the first-pass effect [24]. Although nanobubble ultrasound coupling agents are found to enable noninvasive transdermal drug delivery and real-time imaging of targeted lesions in in vivo studies [25], their clinical applications are still in an early stage. In 2024, a clinical trial optimized postoperative pain control after laparoscopic colorectal surgery by supplementing ultrasound-guided transdermal Fentanyl patch (https://clinicaltrials.gov/), which indicated the great potential of ultrasound nanobubbles in small-molecule drug delivery. However, challenges still exist in the clinical application and translation. For example, drug permeating depth is still limited, especially in obesity with thick subcutaneous and cancer patients with deep tumor lesions [26]. In addition, because ultrasound-based transdermal drug delivery is energy-driven by active devices, portable and wearable ultrasound patches are usually necessary for wider applications. To address these problems, nanobubble sizes [27], concentrations [28], compositions [29], and ultrasound density [30] are adjusted to optimize drug permeation, while small-sized low-frequency transducers, like class V flextensional transducer, are developed to produce ultrasound in portable approach [31]. Therefore, ultrasound-based efficient, safe, and precise drug delivery, from small-molecule to macro-biomolecule drugs, provides more opportunities in therapeutic and diagnostic areas [32].
  • Research Council of Finland(331151)
  • China Scholarship Council
  • UMCG Research Funds
1.
Akhtar N, Singh V, Yusuf M, Khan RA. Non-invasive drug delivery technology: Development and current status of transdermal drug delivery devices, techniques and biomedical applications. Biomed Tech. 2020;65(3):243–272.
2.
Madni A, Rahem MA, Tahir N, Sarfraz M, Jabar A, Rehman M, Kashif PM, Badshah SF, Khan KU, Santos HA. Non-invasive strategies for targeting the posterior segment of eye. Int J Pharm. 2017;530(1-2):326–345.
3.
Nivrutti PR, Nath PA, Anantrao JH. Drug penetration enhancement techniques in transdermal drug delivery system: A review. J Pharm Res Int. 2021;33(19B):46–61.
4.
Han X, Wang F, Shen J, Chen S, Xiao P, Zhu Y, Yi W, Zhao Z, Cai Z, Cui W, et al. Ultrasound nanobubble coupling agent for effective noninvasive deep-layer drug delivery. Adv Mater. 2024;36(3):2306993.
5.
Amani H, Shahbazi M-A, D'Amico C, Fontana F, Abbaszadeh S, Santos HA. Microneedles for painless transdermal immunotherapeutic applications. J Control Release. 2021;330:185–217.
6.
Peña-Juárez MC, Guadarrama-Escobar OR, Escobar-Chávez JJ. Transdermal delivery systems for biomolecules. J Pharm Innov. 2021;17(2):319–332.
7.
Lo Presti A, Montoya NA, Criscuolo V, Khan G, Khan U, Vecchione R, Falconi C. Fundamentals of skin bioimpedances. Adv Mater. 2023;35(33):2302127.
8.
Williams AC, Barry BW. Penetration enhancers. Adv Drug Del Rev. 2014;56(5):603–618.
9.
Araujo F, das Neves J, Martins JP, Granja PL, Santos HA, Sarmento B. Functionalized materials for multistage platforms in the oral delivery of biopharmaceuticals. Prog Mater Sci. 2017;89:306–344.
10.
Bauleth-Ramos T, El-Sayed N, Fontana F, Lobita M, Shahbazi M-A, Santos HA. Recent approaches for enhancing the performance of dissolving microneedles in drug delivery applications. Mater Today. 2023;63:239–287.
11.
Ebrahiminejad V, Prewett PD, Davies GJ, Faraji Rad Z. Microneedle arrays for drug delivery and diagnostics: Toward an optimized design, reliable insertion, and penetration. Adv Mater Interf. 2022;9(6):2101856.
12.
Rahul, De S. A multi-physics model for ultrasonically activated soft tissue. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2017;314:71–84.
13.
Acheta J, Stephens SBZ, Belin S, Poitelon Y. Therapeutic low-intensity ultrasound for peripheral nerve regeneration—A Schwann cell perspective. Front Cell Neurosci. 2022;15: Article 812588.
14.
Liu D, Yang M, Wu Q. Application of ultrasonography in the diagnosis and treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy. Clin Chim Acta. 2018;486:291–297.
15.
Zhang Y, Yu J, Kahkoska AR, Wang J, Buse JB, Gu Z. Advances in transdermal insulin delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2019;139:51–70.
16.
Frerichs DM, Ellingsworth LR, Frech SA, Flyer DC, Villar CP, Yu J, Glenn GM. Controlled, single-step, stratum corneum disruption as a pretreatment for immunization via a patch. Vaccine. 2008;26(22):2782–2787.
17.
Bez M, Foiret J, Shapiro G, Pelled G, Ferrara KW, Gazit D. Nonviral ultrasound-mediated gene delivery in small and large animal models. Nat Protoc. 2019;14(4):1015–1026.
18.
Ryu YC, Kim DI, Kim SH, Wang H-MD, Hwang BH. Synergistic transdermal delivery of biomacromolecules using sonophoresis after microneedle treatment. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng. 2018;23:286–292.
19.
Chen B, Wei J, Iliescu C. Sonophoretic enhanced microneedles array (SEMA)—Improving the efficiency of transdermal drug delivery. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2010;145(1):54–60.
20.
Han X, Yi W, Chen S, Cai Z, Zhu Y, Han W, Guo X, Shen J, Cui W, Bai D. Ultrasound-responsive smart composite biomaterials in tissue repair. Nano Today. 2023;49: Article 101804.
21.
Schoen S Jr, Kilinc MS, Lee H, Guo Y, Degertekin FL, Woodworth GF, Arvanitis C. Towards controlled drug delivery in brain tumors with microbubble-enhanced focused ultrasound. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2022;180: Article 114043.
22.
McMahon D, Deng L, Hynynen K. Comparing rapid short-pulse to tone burst sonication sequences for focused ultrasound and microbubble-mediated blood-brain barrier permeability enhancement. J Control Release. 2021;329:696–705.
23.
Xu J, Yan X, Ge X, Zhang M, Dang X, Yang Y, Xu F, Luo Y, Li G. Novel multi-stimuli responsive functionalized PEG-based co-delivery nanovehicles toward sustainable treatments of multidrug resistant tumor. J Mater Chem B. 2021;9(5):1297–1314.
24.
Vaseem RS, D'cruz A, Shetty S, Vardhan A, Shenoy S, Marques SM, Kumar L, Verma R. Transdermal drug delivery systems: A focused review of the physical methods of permeation enhancement. Adv Pharm Bull. 2024;14(1):67.
25.
Low SS, Lim CN, Yew M, Chai WS, Low LE, Manickam S, Tey BT, Show PL. Recent ultrasound advancements for the manipulation of nanobiomaterials and nanoformulations for drug delivery. Ultrason Sonochem. 2021;80: Article 105805.
26.
Kashkooli FM, Jakhmola A, Hornsby TK, Tavakkoli JJ, Kolios MC. Ultrasound-mediated nano drug delivery for treating cancer: Fundamental physics to future directions. J Control Release. 2023;355:552–578.
27.
Nittayacharn P, Abenojar E, Cooley MB, Berg FM, Counil C, Sojahrood AJ, Khan MS, Yang C, Berndl E, Golczak M, et al. Efficient ultrasound-mediated drug delivery to orthotopic liver tumors—Direct comparison of doxorubicin-loaded nanobubbles and microbubbles. J Control Release. 2024;367:135–147.
28.
Cheng B, Bing C, Xi Y, Shah B, Exner AA, Chopra R. Influence of nanobubble concentration on blood–brain barrier opening using focused ultrasound under real-time acoustic feedback control. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019;45(8):2174–2187.
29.
Helfield B, Zou Y, Matsuura N. Acoustically-stimulated nanobubbles: Opportunities in medical ultrasound imaging and therapy. Front Phys. 2021;9: Article 654374.
30.
Azagury A, Khoury L, Enden G, Kost J. Ultrasound mediated transdermal drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014;72:127–143.
31.
Smith NB. Perspectives on transdermal ultrasound mediated drug delivery. Int J Nanomedicine. 2007;2(4):585–594.
32.
Huang H, Zheng Y, Chang M, Song J, Xia L, Wu C, Jia W, Ren H, Feng W, Chen Y. Ultrasound-based micro-/nanosystems for biomedical applications. Chem Rev. 2024;124(13):8307–8472.
Year 2024 volume 7 Issue 10
PDF
195
112
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.34133/research.0504
  • Receive Date:2024-08-04
  • Online Date:2025-07-24
  • Published:2024-10-14
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2024-08-04
  • Revised:2024-09-21
  • Accepted:2024-09-23
Funding
Research Council of Finland(331151)
China Scholarship Council
UMCG Research Funds
Affiliations
    1Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Prevention and Treatment of Bone and Joint Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.
    2Department of Biomaterials and Biomedical Technology, The Personalized Medicine Research Institute (PRECISION), University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen Ant. Deusinglaan 1, Groningen 9713 AV, The Netherlands.
    3Drug Research Program, Division of Pharmaceutical Chemistry and Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki FI-00014, Finland.

Corresponding:

* Address correspondence to: (H.H.); (H.A.S.)
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/research/EN/10.34133/research.0504
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT