收藏切换
Crosstalk between Lipid Metabolism and Bone Homeostasis: Exploring Intricate Signaling Relationships
收藏切换
PDF
Haixiang Xiao1, 2, , Wenming Li1, , Yi Qin1, , Zhixiang Lin1, Chen Qian1, Mingzhou Wu1, Yu Xia1, Jiaxiang Bai3, *, Dechun Geng1, *
Research. Vol 7 Article ID 0447
Less
收藏切换
Research. Vol 7 Article ID 0447
Review Article
Crosstalk between Lipid Metabolism and Bone Homeostasis: Exploring Intricate Signaling Relationships
Full
Haixiang Xiao1, 2, , Wenming Li1, , Yi Qin1, , Zhixiang Lin1, Chen Qian1, Mingzhou Wu1, Yu Xia1, Jiaxiang Bai3, *, Dechun Geng1, *
Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215006, China.
  • 2Department of Orthopedics, Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230022, China.
  • 3Department of Orthopedics, Jingjiang People's Hospital Affiliated to Yangzhou University, Jingjiang 214500, Jiangsu Province, China.
Published: 2024-08-20 doi: 10.34133/research.0447
Outline
收藏切换

Bone is a dynamic tissue reshaped by constant bone formation and bone resorption to maintain its function. The skeletal system accounts for approximately 70% of the total volume of the body, and continuous bone remodeling requires quantities of energy and material consumption. Adipose tissue is the main energy storehouse of the body and has a strong adaptive capacity to participate in the regulation of various physiological processes. Considering that obesity and metabolic syndrome have become major public health challenges, while osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures have become other major health problems in the aging population, it would be interesting to explore these 2 diseases together. Currently, an increasing number of researchers are focusing on the interactions between multiple tissue systems, i.e., multiple organs and tissues that are functionally coordinated together and pathologically pathologically interact with each other in the body. However, there is lack of detailed reviews summarizing the effects of lipid metabolism on bone homeostasis and the interactions between adipose tissue and bone tissue. This review provides a detailed summary of recent advances in understanding how lipid molecules and adipose-derived hormones affect bone homeostasis, how bone tissue, as a metabolic organ, affects lipid metabolism, and how lipid metabolism is regulated by bone-derived cytokines.

Haixiang Xiao, Wenming Li, Yi Qin, Zhixiang Lin, Chen Qian, Mingzhou Wu, Yu Xia, Jiaxiang Bai, Dechun Geng. Crosstalk between Lipid Metabolism and Bone Homeostasis: Exploring Intricate Signaling Relationships[J]. Research, 2024 , 7 (8) : 0447 . DOI: 10.34133/research.0447
Over the past decades, the seemingly unrelated fields of lipid metabolism and bone homeostasis have become popular research topics, with the development of interdisciplinary studies focusing on the interactions between human tissues, organs, and systems. Particularly, in recent years, a large number of studies, including both preclinical and clinical studies, have revealed complex and profound links between lipid metabolism and bone homeostasis. The bone marrow niche, which is composed of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs), osteoblasts, monocytes, macrophages, osteoclasts, osteoblasts, adipocytes, and others [1], fully reflects the close relationship between bone and adipose tissue metabolism.
On the one hand, BMSCs are subject to multiple influences from adipocytes and osteoclasts in their choice between osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation [2], e.g., fatty acids, leptin, adiponectin, and other factors released from adipocytes alter the fate of BMSCs [3,4]. On the other hand, osteoclast differentiation is closely related to osteoblasts and adipocytes and is regulated by feedback from receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) ligand (RANKL) and osteoprotegerin (OPG) secreted by osteoblasts. Furthermore, the type and proportion of lipids undergo significant changes during the fusion process of osteoclasts [5]. Therefore, adipogenesis, osteogenesis, and osteoclastogenesis are constantly interconnected, regulated, and influenced by each other.
Disruption of metabolic homeostasis in any cell line may lead to disruption of lipid metabolism and bone homeostasis, resulting in concurrent disorders of lipid metabolism and imbalances in bone metabolism [6,7]. However, most of the existing studies have focused on fundamental research with inconsistent and, in some cases, contradictory conclusions, and no consensus has been reached, especially with regard to key molecular mechanisms, signaling pathways, and important clinical findings.
Therefore, it would be interesting to coordinate and summarize the multiple perspectives based on the latest available literature and provide some suggestions for bone–adipose tissue crosstalk studies. Considering the rapid socioeconomic development and improvement of people's living standards over the past half century, disorders of lipid metabolism, dyslipidemia, obesity, and metabolic syndrome have become major public health challenges for both developing and developed countries [8,9]. Moreover, the aging of the population has made osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures major global health issues [10,11]. These 2 common diseases have prompted further understanding of the relationship between lipid metabolism and bone homeostasis, and it will be important to elucidate the molecular signaling or cellular mechanisms that underlie the intrinsic link between these 2 metabolic pathways.
In this review, we discussed the complex effects of lipid metabolism and several important metabolic products on bone homeostasis. Specifically, we summarized the effects of fatty acids, cholesterol, adiponectin, and leptin on the metabolism, differentiation, and function of osteoblasts and osteoclasts, as well as the signaling receptors and pathways involved. We also discuss the potential drug development and clinical applications of certain important signaling targets, which will be useful sources of inspiration for other readers and researchers. We have also completed a series of reviews on strategies for targeting skeletal disease [12,13]. Furthermore, we elucidated how the skeletal system, as a crucial metabolic and endocrine organ, influences lipid metabolism, and 3 bone-derived cytokines responsible for modulating lipid metabolism were individually investigated. Finally, based on the current research, we analyzed and provided insights into future research priorities and challenges from both basic research and clinical application perspectives.
Lipids are a heterogeneous class of organic molecules characterized by hydrophobicity and low molecular weight (commonly <1,000 dalton). The structure of lipids consists of linear alkyl chains, usually with an even number of carbon atoms, and may be saturated or unsaturated, featuring double bonds at characteristic positions. Additionally, lipids may contain isoprene units with either linear or cyclic structures. Lipid metabolism and its metabolites play a crucial role in modulating bone homeostasis through various mechanisms. First, lipids, as fundamental components of biological membranes in bone cells, determine the physicochemical properties of the membrane, thus influencing cellular behavior [14]. Second, lipid metabolism, particularly fatty acid β-oxidation, serves as a vital energy source for bone cells during energy-demanding processes such as osteoblast differentiation and osteoclast bone resorption, where glycolysis alone is insufficient [2,15]. Third, lipids or their metabolic intermediates act as signaling molecules binding to receptors on the surface of bone cells, thereby altering downstream signaling pathways and cellular behavior [16]. Moreover, adipose tissue or adipocytes produce cytokines that exert paracrine or endocrine effects on the differentiation potential, direction, and cellular function of bone precursor cells [17,18].
Therefore, imbalances in exogenous lipid intake or disruptions in endogenous lipid homeostasis can have either positive or negative effects on bone homeostasis. This section will explore the 2 significant lipid molecules, fatty acids and cholesterol, as well as 2 representative adipokines, leptin and adiponectin, and their distinct impacts on the biological behavior of osteoblastic and osteoclastic cell lineages, encompassing energy metabolism, membrane homeostasis, and cellular signaling. In addition, clinical studies investigating the influence of lipid metabolism on bone homeostasis and the potential translational applications of these findings will also be discussed.
Fatty acids are the fundamental components of lipids, and both the de novo synthesis and β-oxidation of fatty acids are essential processes in lipid metabolism. Therefore, the effects of fatty acids on the metabolism, differentiation, and function of bone cells are diverse. Fatty acids may alter the biological membrane stability, energy metabolism, and intracellular signal transduction of bone cells. This regulatory function of fatty acids may occur through direct actions on bone cells or by linking lipid metabolism and bone metabolism via a crucial hub, namely, vascular endothelial cells, particularly the H-type vessels discovered in recent years. These vessels modify the energy metabolism and signal transduction of bone cells, thereby indirectly regulating bone homeostasis.
In bone tissue, fatty acids primarily originate from 2 sources: exogenous dietary intake and endogenous de novo synthesis. Dietary lipids are broken down and processed in the intestine through a series of digestive enzymes and bile salts, after which triglycerides and cholesterol are packaged into chylomicrons within the intestinal epithelium. These chylomicrons are then absorbed via the lymphatic system [19] and enter the bloodstream. In capillaries, lipoprotein lipase breaks down a portion of the chylomicrons, releasing free fatty acids that are absorbed and utilized by target tissues such as adipose tissue and bone tissue [20] (Fig. 1). The remaining chylomicrons are cleared by the liver. As a sensor and regulatory hub for lipid homeostasis, the liver plays a critical role; hepatocytes take up chylomicron remnants through the cell membrane surface apolipoprotein E, and chylomicron remnants yield decomposition products, including free fatty acids and circulating glucose, which serve as substrates for de novo triglyceride synthesis.
Triglycerides, cholesterol, and other breakdown products of chylomicron remnants are repackaged into lipoprotein particles, such as very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and released into circulation [21], where they encounter lipoprotein lipase and release free fatty acids. Endogenous fatty acid synthesis predominantly occurs in the cytoplasm and mitochondria of cells. Acetyl-CoA (coenzyme A), generated through processes such as glycolysis, amino acid metabolism, and ketone body metabolism in mitochondria, is transported to the cytoplasm. In the cytoplasm, acetyl-CoA carboxylase catalyzes the carboxylation of acetyl-CoA, forming malonyl-CoA. Subsequently, fatty acid synthase condenses 7 malonyl-CoA molecules with one acetyl-CoA molecule, producing palmitic acid (PA) ester as the initial product of fatty acid synthesis (Fig. 1). PA ester further undergoes elongation and desaturation, which are mediated by elongase and desaturases, respectively, resulting in the production of fatty acids with varying chain lengths and degrees of saturation.
The role of vascular endothelial cells in bone energy metabolism has received extensive attention in recent years [22]. Vessels not only supply bone tissue with essential nutrients, oxygen, and growth factors but also transport lipids and lipid metabolic products to bone cells (Fig. 1). Knowledge of the cellular communication mechanisms between vascular endothelial cells and the bone microenvironment has rapidly expanded recently. A subtype of capillary closely associated with osteoblasts is known as the H-type vessel, which is characterized by high expression of CD31 and endomucin, and is primarily located near the growth plate at the metaphysis and periosteum of the diaphysis [23]. The function of H-type vessels may be more than just transporting lipids or other nutrients. There is evidence of molecular crosstalk between osteoblastic and osteoclastic lineages and H-type endothelial cells. For instance, SLIT3 is an osteoblast-derived angiogenic factor, and knockout of the SLIT3 gene may impair H-type vessel formation, consequently leading to reduced bone mass [24].
In addition, H-vessel formation is an essential bone regeneration enhancer during bone deficiency repair. On the one hand, osteogenic lineage cells around H vessels had a higher bone formation capacity than other osteoblasts, and the expression levels of Osterix and Runx2 were also increased [25]. On the other hand, H vessels also produce various factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and Noggin, to facilitate osteogenic differentiation of osteogenic progenitor cells [25]. Although type H vessels are highly coupled with osteogenesis, the related mechanism has not been elucidated. Therefore, further studies are needed to elucidate the mechanism and to provide directions for the future treatment of bone diseases by targeting type H vessels.
As crucial constituents involved in the construction of eukaryotic cell membranes, the type and composition ratio of fatty acids profoundly influence the chemical composition and physical properties of the cellular membrane, consequently altering the biological behavior of bone cells. Specifically, in osteoblast cell lineages, remodeling the lipidome of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) with dietary fat alters the specific membrane composition and biophysical properties of MSCs, ultimately altering their osteogenic differentiation potential. Supplementation with docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) induces extensive lipidomic changes in MSCs, mimicking the composition and structure of osteoblastic plasma membranes and thereby enhancing MSC osteogenic differentiation [26]. Analysis of lipid metabolism during osteogenic-induced differentiation of human adipose tissue stem cells using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy revealed notable lipid alterations primarily between days 1 and 7, characterized by increased phospholipids and longer, more unsaturated fatty acids. A tendency toward lipidome stabilization was observed after day 7. This evidence indicates that during different stages of osteoblastic cell differentiation, the composition and proportions of fatty acids undergo dynamic changes, which may be associated with alterations in membrane fluidity during the differentiation process [27].
However, few studies have focused on investigating the effect of fatty acids on the phenotype of osteoclast cell membranes. It can be inferred that the effect of free fatty acids on the structure and composition of the cellular membrane is ubiquitous across human tissue cells, and mature osteoclasts and mononuclear macrophages are no exception. In future studies, it would be meaningful to investigate the impact of fatty acids on lipid rafts in osteoclasts, changes in membrane fluidity, and their effects on osteoclast fusion and resorptive function.
Since the discovery of fatty acids as substrates capable of providing energy to bone tissue and isolated cells by Fleisch and colleagues in 1987 [28], numerous in vivo and in vitro studies have verified that fatty acids are key substrates for energy metabolism in cell differentiation and bone remodeling. A recent high-quality study showed that the differential fate of BMSCs is driven by a decrease in extracellular lipids. Serum lipid deprivation prevents the differentiation of BMSCs toward osteoblasts, as evidenced by a decrease in collagen type I α 1 (Col I a1)-expressing cells and reduced mineralization. This process leads to slower fracture healing, which is reversed by fatty acid supplementation [15]. The above phenomenon indicates that relying solely on glucose as a substrate for energy metabolism may not be sufficient to meet the rapidly increasing energy demands of skeletal progenitor cells during differentiation.
When the energy demand of bone cells increases, stored lipids can be rapidly mobilized and broken down through lipolysis [29]. Lipolysis involves cytoplasmic lipases acting on lipid droplets in 3 steps: (a) adipose triglyceride lipase hydrolyzes triglycerides, releasing a fatty acid and producing diacylglycerol; (b) hormone-sensitive lipase converts diacylglycerol to monoacylglycerol, releasing another fatty acid; and (c) monoacylglycerol lipase hydrolyzes monoacylglycerol, producing glycerol and a final free fatty acid. The resulting free fatty acids can be utilized by the cell or neighboring cells for energy production.
In bone tissue, bone cells may take up fatty acids in the form of free fatty acids or as part of lipoprotein complexes (Fig. 1). Various forms of G protein-coupled receptors (GPRs) on the cell membrane transport free fatty acids directly into the cell. Cell membrane receptors such as LDL receptor (LDLR) and cluster of differentiation 36 (CD36) transport lipoprotein complexes into the cell through endocytosis or other mechanisms. Subsequently, lipoproteins may be released within the cell through lysosomal degradation, leading to the presence of free fatty acids [30]. Compared with wild-type mice, knockout CD36 mice exhibit a low bone mass phenotype, and in vitro cultures of osteoblasts derived from knockout CD36 mice show reduced cell expansion and survival, as well as reduced expression of osteogenic-related genes and proteins [31]. Vascular endothelial cells play a key role in linking lipid metabolism and bone homeostasis. H-type vessels located in the metaphysis and under the periosteum, in addition to transporting lipids and metabolic products through endothelial cells to bone cells, may also produce intermediary signaling molecules that affect the energy metabolism of bone cells. This coupling between vessels, endothelial cells, and the bone metabolic microenvironment provides a theoretical basis for improving bone homeostasis by regulating the lipid metabolism of endothelial cells [22]. Based on this evidence, in recent years, numerous foundational studies and preclinical studies have focused on exploring the connections among statins, angiogenic drugs, and bone metabolism [32].
Initially, free fatty acids in the cellular matrix are activated to form fatty acyl-CoA. Subsequently, fatty acyl-CoA is converted to acyl-carnitine derivatives and transported into the mitochondrial matrix by carnitine palmitoyl transferase 1 (CPT1) and carnitine-acylcarnitine translocase (CAT). Within the inner mitochondrial membrane, fatty acyl-CoA is regenerated through the removal of carnitine by carnitine-palmitoyl transferase 2 (CPT2). Then, fatty acyl CoA undergoes β-oxidation to generate acetyl-CoA, which enters the tricarboxylic acid cycle and produces adenosine triphosphate (ATP) via oxidative phosphorylation. CAT is the key rate-limiting enzyme for acyl-CoA entry into mitochondria. Several studies have shown that carnitine supplementation promotes β-oxidation of fatty acids, stimulates the activity of osteoblasts and their progenitor cells, and promotes osteogenic differentiation; these processes improve ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis in animal models and promote fracture healing [33,34]. When CPT2 was specifically disrupted in osteoblasts and bone cells, CPT2 mutant mice exhibited notable deficiencies in postnatal bone formation [35] (Fig. 1).
The molecular signaling mechanisms regulating fatty acid β-oxidation in bone cells are complex. During the differentiation and maturation of osteoblasts and osteoclasts, as well as during different periods when osteoblasts perform mineralization functions and osteoclasts perform resorption functions, the cellular energy demands vary, leading to differences in the uptake and utilization of fatty acids [36]. Frey et al. [37] reported that the Wnt-Lrp5 signaling pathway plays a crucial role in regulating fatty acid metabolism in osteoblasts. Specifically, mice lacking Lrp5 in osteoblasts exhibit obesity, low bone mass, and impaired fatty acid β-oxidation.
Based on current research, several questions remain regarding the effect of fatty acids on the energy metabolism of skeletal cells. First, most current studies on energy metabolism in the skeleton have focused on fatty acid metabolism in the osteoblast lineage, with few studies on energy metabolism in the osteoblast lineage. As mentioned, the progenitor cells of osteoblasts, macrophages in the bone marrow microenvironment, contain fat droplets, but how these lipid droplets and foreign fatty acids generate a response according to the energy requirements of osteoblast differentiation and maturation is still poorly understood. Second, most existing studies on the effects of lipid energy metabolism on osteoblasts have focused on whether osteogenic differentiation is promoted or inhibited. The osteoblast lineage includes multiple cell types, ranging from BMSCs and pre-osteoblasts in the bone marrow niche to mature osteoblasts in the endosteum. Energy requirements may not be consistent at each developmental stage [38]; thus, further studies are needed to elucidate when and how fatty acids affect osteoblast differentiation and mineralization.
Fatty acids act as signaling molecules, exerting their biological effects through interactions with receptors in skeletal cells. Specifically, cell membrane receptors [including GPRs and Toll-like receptors (TLRs)] and nuclear receptors [mainly peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs)] of osteoblasts and osteoclasts, upon binding with fatty acids, induce transmembrane or intracellular signaling, leading to changes in the transcription and translation of target genes, thereby regulating cell differentiation, growth, behavior, and function. Considering the complexity of fatty acid classification, this section will discuss the effects of long-chain unsaturated fatty acids (LCUFAs), saturated fatty acids (SFAs), short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), and medium-chain fatty acids (MCFAs) on bone cell metabolism. Based on the categories and names of fatty acids, potential receptors and signaling pathways, and their effects on specific bone cells, along with the corresponding references, are summarized in Table. The fatty acid signaling pathways and their effects on osteoblasts (including BMSCs), osteoclasts [including bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMMs)], and osteocytes, which are closely associated with bone homeostasis, are discussed.
Osteoblasts: Fatty acids, as signaling molecules, significantly influence BMSCs by interacting with specific receptors. LCUFAs, including ω-3 and ω-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids (LCPUFAs), as well as long-chain monounsaturated fatty acids (LCMUFAs), play crucial roles in regulating BMSC differentiation. ω-3 LCPUFAs are known for their anti-inflammatory [39] and osteogenic effects [40], as they promote bone formation and improve bone density by up-regulating the osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs [26,4143]. ω-6 LCPUFAs often exhibit proinflammatory properties, leading to reduced osteogenic differentiation and increased bone resorption [44]. The signaling mechanisms involved in ω-3 LCPUFA-mediated osteoblast differentiation include the activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, which is crucial for promoting osteogenesis. Studies have demonstrated that supplementation with ω-3 LCPUFAs in obese osteoporotic mice significantly up-regulated the expression of osteogenic markers, leading to increased bone formation and improved bone mineral density (BMD) [45]. Conversely, ω-6 LCPUFAs promote the synthesis of arachidonic acid (AA) and proinflammatory eicosanoids such as prostaglandins, which can inhibit osteoblast differentiation and function [39]. In addition, LCMUFAs, such as ω-5, ω-7, and ω-9 LCMUFAs, are commonly considered potential agents against disorders of bone metabolism; more specifically, they promote osteogenesis, inhibit osteoclastogenesis, and ultimately facilitate bone formation [46,47]. LCPUFAs exert their effects primarily through GPR40 and GPR120 receptors (Table and Fig. 2). For example, eicosatetraenoic acid (EPA), an ω-3 LCPUFA, can induce adaptive autophagy in BMSCs by binding to GPR120, counteracting apoptosis, and facilitating differentiation into osteoblasts [45,48]. Additionally, in the nucleus, ω-3 LCPUFAs have been shown to act as ligands for PPARα and PPARβ/δ, promoting osteogenesis [49], while ω-6 LCPUFAs activate PPARγ, which shifts BMSC differentiation toward adipogenesis rather than osteogenesis [50,51]. This differentiation shift is crucial because it highlights the balance between ω-3 and ω-6 fatty acids maintained within BMSCs, influencing whether these stem cells become bone-forming cells or fat-storing cells.
Moreover, SFAs, such as PA, can have adverse effects on osteoblasts (Table). For instance, PA induces lipotoxicity, reducing osteogenic differentiation by decreasing alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and the expression of key osteogenic genes such as RUNX2 and osterix [52]. The activation of TLR4 by SFAs in osteoblasts leads to increased endoplasmic reticulum stress and inflammatory responses, which inhibit osteoblast differentiation and mineralization. Studies have shown that PA can induce apoptosis in mature osteoblasts [53], further contributing to decreased bone formation and increased bone resorption. However, it has also been observed that the negative effects of PA on osteoblasts can be mitigated by the induction of autophagy, which helps to restore the osteogenic potential of these cells [54,55].
MCFAs contain 6 to 12 carbon atoms in their carbon chain and are primarily composed of caprylic acid and capric acid. In the osteoblast lineage, certain in vitro experiments have shown that treatment of BMSCs with octanoic acid significantly up-regulates lipogenic markers such as CCAAT/enhancer binding protein α and PPAR γ while concurrently suppressing osteogenic-related genes such as RUNX2 and OPG. This suggests that octanoic acid skews the regulation of the lipogenic–osteogenic balance in the bone marrow toward lipogenic differentiation, thereby inhibiting osteoblast differentiation [56]. Correspondingly, in vivo experiments have shown notable detrimental changes in trabecular bone microarchitecture in octanoic acid-treated mice, revealing significant reductions in BMD and bone mineral content, as well as diminished levels of ALP [57] (Table).
SCFAs, primarily acetate, propionate, and butyrate, are predominantly produced through the fermentation of dietary fiber by the intestinal microbiome, although they may also originate from skin and vaginal bacteria. Existing studies overwhelmingly suggest that SCFAs have a beneficial effect on bone homeostasis (Table). In vitro experiments showed that the action of acetate and propionate on primary osteoblasts significantly up-regulated ALP activity and promoted early osteoblast differentiation [58]. Wallimann et al. [59] further demonstrated that coculturing butyrate with BMSCs resulted in increased calcium deposition by BMSCs while concurrently reducing osteoclast formation and resorption activity in a dose-dependent manner. In vivo experiments showed that by supplementing mice with Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, which produces butyrate in the intestine, or by feeding them directly with butyrate, microcomputed tomography showed an increase in trabecular bone volume in mice, suggesting that SCFAs have a positive effect on bone anabolism.
Osteoclasts: Osteoclasts, which are responsible for bone resorption, are significantly influenced by fatty acids through various signaling pathways. Numerous studies have reported that ω3-LCPUFAs directly inhibit the differentiation and activity of osteoclasts [60,61]. In contrast to the effects of ω-3 LCPUFAs, elevated levels or a high ratio of ω-6 LCPUFAs increases bone loss by promoting chronic inflammation, reducing BMSC osteogenic differentiation, activating osteoclasts, and promoting osteoclast maturation. ω-3 LCPUFAs inhibit osteoclast differentiation and activity mainly by binding to GPR120 and GPR40 [62] (Table and Fig. 2). However, the effects of LCUFAs on PPARs in the osteoclast lineage are currently controversial. Nakanishi and Tsukamoto [63] reported that ω-3 LCPUFAs enhance osteoclast differentiation in BMMs by activating PPAR-γ; nevertheless, simultaneous activation of PPAR-γ in MSCs inhibits NF-κB activation to suppress osteoclast formation. Recently, Kasonga et al. [64] showed that the activation of all PPARs by LCUFAs down-regulates the activation of the RANKL signaling pathway and inhibits osteoclast formation.
SFAs promote osteoclast activity and bone resorption. PA, for example, enhances osteoclastogenesis by activating TLR4, leading to increased NF-κB signaling and osteoclast survival (Table and Fig. 2). The proinflammatory environment created by SFAs stimulates osteoclast differentiation and function, resulting in increased bone resorption and decreased bone density [65]. SFAs can induce the production of macrophage inflammatory protein-1α (MIP-1α) and promote the survival of mature osteoclasts, further exacerbating bone loss [66]. In contrast, the effects of SFAs on the activation of GPRs may be controversial. Philippe et al. [67] reported that when C57/BL6 female mice were stimulated with a diet rich in SFAs, the activation of GPR40 regulates the OPG/RANKL/NF-κB axis, reducing NF-κB activation and decreasing osteoclastogenesis, which helps to counteract ovariectomy-induced bone loss; however, this in vivo experiment failed to exclude the interfering effects of other fatty acids.
MCFAs tend to impede osteoclast formation. In vitro studies revealed that decanoic acid diminishes the viability and differentiation of osteoclasts by suppressing NF-κB signaling while enhancing the apoptosis of mature osteoclasts through the inhibition of extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK) activation [68]. Similarly, in vivo experiments involving mice fed caprylic acid for 4 weeks revealed an increase in the specific marker tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) of osteoclasts. Therefore, based on existing evidence, MCFAs appear to exert inhibitory effects on the differentiation, maturation, and function of osteoclasts. MCFAs exert their signaling effects by binding to the GPR84 receptor on the cell membranes of bone cells (Table and Fig. 2). Activation of GPR84 leads to down-regulation of the ERK/NF-κB signaling pathway, thereby reducing the differentiation and maturation of osteoblasts and osteoclasts [56,68,69]. Notably, in addition to the GPR84 receptor, other receptor signaling systems may be involved, and the existing ERK/NF-κB signaling pathway may interact with other signaling pathways. Addressing these questions may necessitate further in-depth basic research.
In osteoclasts, SCFAs inhibit osteoclastogenesis and down-regulate osteoclastic resorptive function [59]. Notably, propionate and butyrate effectively inhibit CoCrMo alloy particle-induced macrophage pyroptosis and osteoclastogenesis, thereby mitigating wear particle-induced osteolysis [70]. These SCFAs induce metabolic reprogramming of osteoclasts, enhancing glycolysis at the expense of oxidative phosphorylation and down-regulating essential osteoclast genes such as tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6) and nuclear factor of activated T cells cytoplasmic 1 (NFATc1) [71]. The main receptors for SCFAs in skeletal cells include GPR43 and GPR41, which are located on the cell membrane (Table and Fig. 2). Bone samples from GPR43-deficient mice (GPR43−/−) receiving a high-SCFA diet reportedly show increased osteoclast differentiation and activity, while bone markers from wild-type mice favor bone formation [72]. These results suggest that SCFAs promote osteoblast differentiation and limiting osteoclast activation in response to GPR43 activation.
Osteocytes: Osteocytes, the most abundant cells in bone, play a critical role in maintaining bone homeostasis by regulating the activity of osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Emerging evidence suggests that fatty acids, integral components of cellular membranes and precursors to signaling molecules, significantly influence osteocyte function. ω-3 LCPUFAs, particularly EPA and DHA, are known for their anti-inflammatory properties [73]. They influence osteocyte signaling by modulating the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and eicosanoids. EPA and DHA can be converted into specialized pro-resolving mediators such as resolvins and protectins, which reduce inflammation and oxidative stress in osteocytes [39]. This modulation occurs through the activation of G GPRs like GPR120, which subsequently triggers intracellular signaling cascades that enhance osteocyte survival and function. ω-3 LCPUFAs also impact the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, a crucial signaling route for bone formation and osteocyte function. By enhancing this pathway, EPA and DHA promote the survival and activity of osteocytes [74]. While ω-6 LCPUFAs such as AA are necessary for normal cellular functions, their metabolites (prostaglandins and leukotrienes) can promote inflammation. The balance between ω-3 LCPUFAs and ω-3 LCPUFAs is crucial in osteocytes. High levels of AA-derived metabolites can exacerbate inflammation, potentially leading to osteocyte apoptosis and impaired bone remodeling [45]. Conversely, controlled levels of AA can support osteocyte function by participating in the synthesis of signaling molecules that are essential for cellular communication and bone homeostasis [75].
SFAs, typically found in animal fats and some plant oils, have a distinct influence on cellular signaling due to their structural characteristics. SFAs contribute to the rigidity of cell membranes, impacting the function of membrane-bound proteins and receptors involved in signaling transduction [76]. Excessive SFA intake can lead to altered membrane properties, impairing the fluidity required for optimal receptor function and signaling molecule diffusion. High levels of SFAs are associated with increased production of pro-inflammatory cytokines through the activation of TLRs, particularly TLR4 [77]. This activation can induce chronic inflammation in osteocytes, leading to apoptosis and disrupted bone homeostasis. SFAs may also influence osteocyte signaling by affecting the NF-κB pathway [78], a key regulator of inflammation and cell survival. Chronic activation of NF-κB can detrimentally affect osteocyte viability and function.
MCFAs possess unique metabolic properties that differentiate them from long-chain fatty acids. Unlike SFAs, MCFAs have been shown to have a neutral or even beneficial effect on inflammation, potentially by modulating mitochondrial function and reducing oxidative stress [79]. MCFAs may influence osteocyte signaling by modulating the PPAR pathway. Activation of PPARs, particularly PPARδ, supports lipid metabolism and energy homeostasis in osteocytes [80], promoting their survival and function. MCFAs also affect the adenosine 5-monophosphate activated protein kinase (AMPK) pathway, a critical regulator of cellular energy status. Activation of AMPK enhances osteocyte autophagy and stress response mechanisms, contributing to improved cell survival under metabolic stress [81].
The SCFAs have systemic effects beyond the gut, influencing bone metabolism and osteocyte function. SCFAs influence osteocyte signaling through the gut–bone axis [82]. They are absorbed into the bloodstream and can affect bone cells directly. SCFAs, particularly butyrate [83], have been shown to enhance osteocyte viability and function by modulating histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity [84]. Inhibition of HDAC by butyrate promotes the expression of genes involved in osteocyte survival. SCFAs also influence the production of gut-derived hormones such as glucagon-like peptide-1, which have been shown to impact bone metabolism and osteocyte function indirectly.
In summary, fatty acids play a significant role in regulating the differentiation and function of bone cells through interactions with specific receptors and signaling pathways. LCUFAs, particularly ω-3 and ω-6 LCPUFAs, have differential effects on bone metabolism, with ω-3 LCPUFAs generally promoting osteogenesis and anti-inflammatory responses, while ω-6 LCPUFAs exhibit proinflammatory properties and inhibit osteogenesis. SFAs generally have detrimental effects on bone cells, promoting inflammation and bone resorption, while MCFAs and SCFAs exhibit beneficial effects on bone health by inhibiting osteoclastogenesis and promoting osteogenesis. Understanding the precise mechanisms by which these fatty acids exert their effects on bone cells is crucial for developing dietary and therapeutic strategies to enhance bone health and prevent bone-related diseases. Future research should focus on elucidating the specific signaling pathways and receptors involved in fatty acid regulation of bone metabolism to provide a comprehensive understanding of the interplay between dietary fatty acids and bone health.
In recent years, a large number of clinical observational studies have described the therapeutic potential of fatty acids, especially long-chain fatty acids, in bone metabolic diseases. Most of the current epidemiological surveys and human studies have shown that increasing the dietary intake of ω-3 LCPUFAs or the ratio of ω-3 LCPUFAs to ω-6 LCPUFAs improves human bone structure [8587]. In addition, ω-3 LCPUFAs may have another beneficial effect on bone homeostasis by mitigating the side effects of bone-targeted drugs. Fan et al. [88] reported that the intake of ω-3 LCPUFAs alleviates bone marrow injury and bone tissue toxicity induced by azacitidine or cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in rats.
The main cause of osteoporosis is an imbalance between overactive osteoclasts and inactive osteoblasts, leading to excessive bone resorption. Animal studies have shown that ω-3 LCPUFAs attenuate osteoporosis by inhibiting bone destruction, increasing dietary calcium absorption, and increasing skeletal BMD [89]. Mechanistically, ω-3 LCPUFAs inhibit osteoclastogenesis and decrease low-grade chronic inflammation, thereby contributing to the prevention and alleviation of osteoporosis. Furthermore, the intake of ω-6 LCPUFAs leads to an increase in the ratio of ω-6 to ω-3 LCPUFAs, which promotes osteoporosis by facilitating low-grade inflammation and suppressing the osteogenesis of MSC lineages [90]. Studies have also revealed that because of the susceptibility of LCPUFAs to reactive oxygen species (ROS)-associated oxidative damage, treatment with the antioxidant CoQ during osteoporosis treatment could reduce the drawbacks of LCPUFAs [91]. However, the correlation between fatty acids and osteoporosis has not been consistent in studies conducted in humans.
Bone fracture is the most serious complication of osteoporosis. Chen et al. [92] showed that supplementation with ω-3 LCPUFAs promoted fracture healing in a mouse fracture model. In addition, several clinical studies have shown that increasing total PUFA intake is beneficial for maintaining BMD and reducing fracture risk [87]. However, an epidemiological survey showed that reduced intake of total PUFAs and ω-6 LCPUFAs increased the risk of hip fracture in women [93]. This discrepancy may be due to differences in data processing, sample inclusion, and study design. Moreover, the diversity of fatty acid types may be another important factor. In conclusion, different types of fatty acids may affect fractures differently. Thus, additional investigations are needed to elucidate the specific underlying mechanisms involved.
Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic inflammatory disease associated with autoimmune abnormalities that usually leads to cartilage and bone erosion, causing primary joint destruction. Studies have shown that ω-3 LCPUFAs attenuate the symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis, including joint swelling and morning stiffness, by inhibiting inflammatory cytokines and cartilage-degrading enzymes [94]. In addition, the LCPUFA AA promotes the synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines. Therefore, concomitant restriction of the LCPUFA AA may enhance the anti-rheumatoid arthritis effects of ω-3 LCPUFAs by reducing the production of metalloproteinases and proinflammatory cytokines [94]. ω-6 LCPUFAs, another type of LCPUFA, are ultimately metabolized to AA and exert proinflammatory effects. In contrast, ω-3 LCPUFAs interact with the delta-6 desaturase enzyme, which is the rate-limiting synthase of ω-6 LCPUFAs, resulting in a therapeutic effect on rheumatoid arthritis [95].
It should be noted that the data from current observational studies are highly heterogeneous, and the evidence level is not high; therefore, the conclusions of these studies need to be treated with caution. In summary, fatty acids may have significant potential in improving bone homeostasis and treating bone metabolic diseases. Considering that our daily diet contains a substantial quantity of fatty acids, further research into the effects of fatty acids on bone metabolism and their potential mechanisms would be valuable for exploring their beneficial effects on various metabolic bone diseases. If possible, using “food therapy” instead of “drug therapy” to treat diseases like osteoporosis would be highly valuable.
The sources of cholesterol in bone cells include exogenous uptake and endogenous synthesis. Exogenous cholesterol intake mainly involves the processing of dietary cholesterol by digestive enzymes, which are initially packaged into chylomicrons and enter the blood circulation [96]. Through hepatic reassembly, most chylomicrons circulate in the blood as LDL, which is then captured by LDLR on the surface of target cells. This leads to LDL-LDLR endocytosis and further intracellular hydrolysis of LDL, eventually producing free cholesterol [97]. Endogenous cholesterol synthesis involves the following main steps: First, 2 acetyl-CoA molecules are reverse-catalyzed by thiolate to produce acetoacetic-CoA; subsequently, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) is generated via the catalysis of HMG-CoA synthase using acetoacetic-CoA and acetyl-CoA, which is then converted to mevalonate via a rate-limiting step catalyzed by HMG-CoA reductase (HMGCR). Mevalonate undergoes a series of phosphorylation and decarboxylation reactions to form isopentenyl pyrophosphate, which is then converted to dimethylallyl pyrophosphate. These 2 compounds are condensed to produce geranyl pyrophosphate, which undergoes further condensation with isopentenyl pyrophosphate to form farnesyl pyrophosphate. Squalene synthase catalyzes the condensation of 2 molecules of farnesyl pyrophosphate to form squalene. Finally, squalene undergoes cyclization, facilitated by specific cyclase enzymes, to produce lanosterol, which is subsequently converted into cholesterol [98,99]. Given its pivotal role in cholesterol synthesis, HMGCR serves as a crucial target for drug intervention aimed at regulating cholesterol levels. Modulating HMGCR activity can significantly impact managing cholesterol-related disorders and may offer therapeutic benefits in various clinical settings (Fig. 1).
In a healthy state, cholesterol levels in the body are regulated through a complex interplay of factors, including dietary intake, endogenous synthesis, transport, cellular uptake, and excretion. This intricate balance ensures cholesterol homeostasis. However, disturbances in this equilibrium, such as hypercholesterolemia, often result from a combination of environmental factors, such as obesity, unhealthy diet, and stress, along with genetic predisposition [100]. While there is a direct relationship between dietary cholesterol intake and serum cholesterol levels in some cases, the circulating levels of cholesterol are also influenced by other dietary components. For instance, the intake of SFAs, trans fatty acids, dietary soluble fiber, and fructose can significantly impact cholesterol metabolism. Consequently, maintaining normal cholesterol levels is vital for overall health. However, excessive cholesterol accumulation can have detrimental effects on cellular function and is implicated in the dysregulation of bone homeostasis.
Cell membranes are vital barriers for cells and serve as the primary interface for the extracellular environment. Among the essential components of the plasma membrane, cholesterol is particularly important for its influence on the physical characteristics of the lipid bilayer. Predominantly hydrophobic, like other steroids, cholesterol is synthesized by all mammalian cells and is mainly situated within the cell membrane [101]. Cholesterol in the lipid bilayer regulates its rigidity, fluidity, and permeability, thereby influencing the overall membrane structure. Additionally, cholesterol interacts with various transmembrane proteins, modulating their conformation and function. Cholesterol also associates with sterol transport proteins, facilitating their intracellular movement and distribution. Furthermore, cholesterol collaborates with lipid–protein complexes such as lipid rafts, contributing to the organization of signaling molecules within membrane microdomains. This interplay potentially impacts the regulation of stem cell behavior and stem cell responsiveness to external stimuli. Thus, cholesterol plays a multifaceted role in shaping cell membrane dynamics and cellular responses [102] (Fig. 3).
Disturbances in cholesterol, caveolin-1, and caveolar homeostasis are crucial for regulating the membrane properties and adhesion characteristics of BMSCs. Supplementing cholesterol in BMSCs enhances membrane cholesterol levels, reduces membrane fluidity, and promotes the accumulation of caveolae and caveolin-1 on the cell membrane. An increase in the cellular membrane cholesterol content may increase the sensitivity of BMSCs to osteogenic induction cues [103105]. Studies have shown that statins, which lower endogenous cholesterol, impair the osteogenic potential of BMSCs and increase cellular senescence and apoptosis [106]. Although these studies do not explicitly identify the specific mechanisms by which statin drugs impair stem cell osteogenic differentiation, it can be inferred that depletion of cellular membrane cholesterol may have a negative effect on the behavior and activity of osteogenic cells. Similarly, the membrane homeostasis of cholesterol in osteoclast cell lines plays an important role in the formation, survival, differentiation, and activity of osteoclasts [107]. Recent findings have established that the disruption of cholesterol homeostasis in osteoclast membranes compromises lipid raft functionality, inhibits osteoclast formation, and triggers osteoclast apoptosis [108] (Fig. 3).
However, the role of cholesterol in cellular biofilms and its impact on bone homeostasis have been marginally explored, suggesting that we may only be seeing the beginning of its implications. The complexity of biofilms is a major obstacle to further understanding; this complexity includes both chemical diversity (the variety of lipid structures within cells) and compositional diversity (the proportions of different lipids and proteins). Chemical diversity imparts unique characteristics to lipids, while compositional diversity affects the overall behavior of lipids in biofilms. Furthermore, it often remains uncertain how variations in lipid composition or structural abnormalities affect disease and phenotypes. Even slight modifications in the cell membrane structure can interfere with the entire metabolic pathway, presenting a challenge in studying the effects of cholesterol.
Cholesterol might act as a signaling molecule that regulates bone cells. In osteoblasts and osteoclasts, cholesterol signaling at different concentrations may initiate different signaling pathways and produce different effects. H-type vessels also play a crucial role in linking cholesterol and the metabolism of bone cells. Cholesterol and various lipoproteins are initially engaged through scavenger receptor B1 (SR-B1) or activin A receptor-like kinase 1 on the apical side of endothelial cells, initiating cellular endocytosis [109]. Through processing by endothelial cells, cholesterol or its metabolic products establish signaling connections with osteoblasts, osteoclasts, or osteocytes.
Osteoblasts: Numerous cellular and animal models have been used to investigate the impact of both serum cholesterol and cellular cholesterol on the proliferation and differentiation of osteoblasts. You et al. [110] reported that in vitro, the proliferation and viability of osteoblasts were inhibited by free cholesterol in a concentration-dependent manner. A recent high-quality literature suggests that cholesterol levels in osteoblasts affect the process of bone formation. Excessive free cholesterol inhibits the expression of key bone formation factors such as BMP2, which reduces the expression of RUNX2, ALP, and Col I a1 and inhibits osteoblast differentiation, while lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT) promotes reverse cholesterol transport, which prevents cholesterol from accumulating in excess in osteoblasts, thereby improving osteoblast survival [111].
It has been shown that exogenous cholesterol can modulate the activity of 7 transmembrane receptor binding sites on cell membranes and can down-regulate Wnt/β-catenin signaling or hedgehog signaling [112]. Cholesterol transmits the hedgehog signal from the transporter-like receptor Patched1 (PTCH1) to Smoothened (SMO) [113] (Fig. 3). During bone development, hedgehog signaling controls the differentiation of BMSCs into chondrocytes and osteoblasts during endochondral ossification by increasing the protein expression of RUNX2 and its downstream target osterix. Inhibition of SMO leads to down-regulation of the hedgehog signaling pathway [114]. Similarly, Li et al. [115] reported that exogenous cholesterol significantly inhibited hedgehog signaling, as evidenced by a decrease in Gli1, a marker of hedgehog signaling, and a decrease in osteogenic markers during the osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs. However, depletion of endogenous cholesterol, which affects only the hedgehog signaling pathway, also reduced the osteogenic response, suggesting the existence of a separate mechanism by which cholesterol regulates osteogenic differentiation independent of hedgehog signaling. Indeed, it has been documented that exogenous cholesterol is directly involved in the regulation of the typical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway [116] and that down-regulation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway may inhibit osteogenic differentiation in BMSCs [117].
As carriers of circulating cholesterol, lipoproteins are essential for the maintenance of cellular cholesterol homeostasis. LDLR, scarb1, and CD36 mediate the endocytosis of lipoprotein particles such as LDL, VLDL, oxidized LDL (ox-LDL), and others (Fig. 3), and intracellularly, these endosomes fuse with lysosomes and are hydrolyzed by lysosomal acid lipase to release free cholesterol [118]. Physiological concentrations of intracellular cholesterol are essential for maintaining cellular activity and differentiation properties [32]. Under pathological conditions such as hypercholesterolemia, LDL, VLDL, and ox-LDL are generally detrimental factors for the differentiation and function of osteoblasts. In vitro investigations demonstrated that overloading ox-LDL suppresses stromal cell osteoblastic differentiation by impeding ALP activity, Col I a1 processing, and mineralization [119].
Osteoclasts: Overall, cholesterol signaling has been shown to play a role in up-regulating osteoclast differentiation and maturation in osteoclast cell lines. Cholesterol alters the autophagic capacity of osteoclasts, increases their viability, and promotes osteoclast differentiation by activating the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway [120]. Sul et al. [121] also reported that cholesterol increased the size, number, fusion index, and bone resorption activity of osteoclasts, indicating that high cholesterol levels increase the number and activity of osteoclasts. While in vivo experiments showed that a high-cholesterol diet increased the number and surface area of TRAP-stained osteoclasts, cholesterol depletion reduced osteoclast formation and bone resorption. This evidence suggests that cholesterol plays a critical role in inducing osteoclast activation and bone loss.
The effect of free cholesterol signaling on osteoclast biology is mediated mainly through liver X receptors (LXRs) localized to the cell membrane and estrogen-related receptor α (ERRα) localized to the nucleus. The expression of LXRs on the cell surface, including LXR and LXRβ, plays important roles in osteoclast differentiation and maintenance of osteoblast activity by regulating intracellular cholesterol homeostasis [122]. On the one hand, LXRα may mediate cholesterol uptake to maintain osteoclast activity, and mice in which LXRα was specifically knocked down showed a significant increase in BMD, and a large number of osteoclasts with lower activity than that of normal cells were detected in the cortical bone of the mice. On the other hand, the activation of LXRβ promotes the excretion of intracellular cholesterol and reduces the uptake of extracellular cholesterol, which is regarded as a limiting factor in osteoclast differentiation and maturation [123,124]. Lu et al. [111] showed that intracellular cholesterol levels affect osteoclast maturation and function. Removal of intracellular cholesterol prevents RANKL- or CSF-1-induced osteoclast formation, and LCAT reduces intracellular cholesterol levels by accelerating cholesterol efflux, thereby inhibiting osteoclast maturation and activity. This process may be achieved by disrupting the transcriptional activity of ERRα. In the cell nucleus, as an ERRα ligand, cholesterol enhances the transcriptional activity of osteoclast-specific genes such as NFATc1, resulting in further enhancement of osteoclast differentiation, while the use of β-cyclodextrin-threaded polytrioxanes to eliminate cholesterol overload reverses the increase in osteoclast differentiation [125,126].
Different types of apolipoproteins produce multiple biological effects on osteoclasts. While increasing LDL levels in conditioned media in vitro significantly up-regulates osteoclast viability [127,128]. Osteoclast formation is reduced when cells are cultured in LDL-depleted serum, and supplementation with ox-LDL reverses impaired osteoclastogenesis in LDL-depleted serum [129]. In contrast, HDL increases the efflux of intracellular cholesterol by increasing the expression of LXRβ, ABCA1, and ABCG1 at the cell membrane. Reverse cholesterol transport reduces the lipotoxicity caused by cholesterol overload on osteoblasts and simultaneously promotes the apoptosis of mature osteoclasts, which is thought to be beneficial for bone formation [108,130]. Scarb1 may play an important role in HDL internalization and cholesterol efflux. In vitro, knocking down Scarb1 in osteoblasts leads to reduced osteogenic differentiation; additionally, in vivo results demonstrated that mice lacking scarb1 exhibit a low bone mass phenotype characterized by decreased bone density and bone volume fraction [131]. All in all, lipoproteins affect the formation, survival, maturation, and apoptosis of osteoblasts and osteoclasts through the regulation of cholesterol homeostasis. This provides a theoretical basis and support for the medical regulation or improvement of lipid profiles to reduce bone loss and promote bone health.
Osteocytes: A plenty of recent research has highlighted the significance of cholesterol and lipoproteins in osteocyte signaling transduction, impacting various cellular functions. Cholesterol, as an essential lipid, is a critical component of cell membranes, influencing membrane fluidity and the function of membrane-bound receptors and ion channels. In osteocytes, cholesterol's role extends to several key signaling pathways: First, cholesterol-rich microdomains, known as lipid rafts, serve as platforms for the assembly of signaling molecules. These rafts facilitate the clustering of receptors and downstream signaling proteins, enhancing signal transduction efficiency. For osteocytes, lipid rafts are vital for mechanical transduction—the process by which mechanical stimuli are converted into biochemical signals [132]. Cholesterol modulates the activity of ion channels and receptors involved in sensing mechanical stress, thus influencing bone remodeling and adaptation to mechanical load. Second, cholesterol interacts with components of this pathway, affecting the stability and activity of β-catenin, and studies suggest that cholesterol depletion impairs Wnt signaling, leading to reduced osteocyte activity and bone formation [133]. Conversely, adequate cholesterol levels support robust Wnt signaling, promoting osteocyte survival and function.
Lipoproteins, responsible for the transport of cholesterol and other lipids in the bloodstream, also play a significant role in osteocyte signaling: LDL is often referred to as “bad cholesterol” due to its association with cardiovascular disease. However, LDL and its receptor (LDLR) are important for cholesterol delivery to osteocytes [128]. Excessive LDL can undergo oxidation, forming ox-LDL, which is detrimental to osteocyte function [119]. Ox-LDL induces oxidative stress and inflammation, similar to oxysterols, leading to osteocyte apoptosis and impaired bone metabolism. HDL, known as “good cholesterol”, facilitates the reverse transport of cholesterol from tissues back to the liver for excretion. HDL exerts protective effects on osteocytes by reducing oxidative stress and inflammation. HDL and its associated enzymes, such as paraoxonase-1, help neutralize ox-LDL and other oxidized lipids, thus preserving osteocyte viability and function [131]. Enhanced HDL levels are associated with improved bone density and reduced risk of osteoporosis. Osteocytes express various lipoprotein receptors, including LDLR and scavenger receptors like scavenger receptor A (SR-A) and CD36. These receptors mediate the uptake of lipoproteins and their associated lipids. Through these receptors, lipoproteins influence intracellular signaling pathways, including those regulating lipid metabolism, oxidative stress, and inflammatory responses [134]. Proper function of these receptors is crucial for maintaining osteocyte health and bone homeostasis.
Over the past few decades, epidemiological data have provided compelling evidence linking serum cholesterol levels to bone health [135140]. However, it is important to acknowledge that most of these investigations have significant limitations, including insufficient evidence from cross-sectional studies and even conflicting conclusions among different studies. These limitations may be attributed to the heterogeneity of clinical investigations themselves and inconsistencies in cholesterol and lipoprotein detection methods. Nevertheless, the presentation of this clinical evidence is important because it potentially suggests that maintaining an appropriate total cholesterol concentration may help prevent bone loss. Moreover, certain serum biomarkers, such as free cholesterol, LDL-C, and HDL-C, may serve as responsive indicators for the early detection of osteoporosis and guide treatment strategies in the future.
Cholesterol regulates bone metabolism in multiple ways, and vitamin D, an important metabolite of cholesterol, plays a crucial role in the maintenance of skeletal bone mass [141]. It is well known that elevated cholesterol promotes arterial calcification, and interestingly, high levels of cholesterol are negatively correlated with bone density [142]. A previous cross-sectional study in a Spanish population revealed a negative correlation between serum total cholesterol levels and 25(OH) vitamin D levels [143]. In addition, patients with familial hypercholesterolemia had reduced BMD [144]. Animal studies have shown that a high-cholesterol diet leads to osteoblast insufficiency and increased numbers of osteoclasts [141].
The association between serum cholesterol levels and skeletal health suggests the potential therapeutic value of cholesterol-lowering drugs in improving bone homeostasis. One notable example is the exploration of statins for reducing bone loss. Several preclinical studies have indicated that in osteoblast cell lines, statins increase osteoblast viability, osteogenic differentiation potential, and mineralization capacity [145148]. In osteoclast cell lines, numerous studies have reported the inhibitory effects of statins on osteoclast differentiation and activity, leading to a reduction in bone loss and potential therapeutic benefits in osteoporosis [149155]. Consistent with the findings of the preclinical studies described above, most of the observational clinical studies have confirmed the effectiveness of statins in improving BMD and reducing fracture risk [156159]. It is important to recognize that the results derived from these observational and secondary studies are not conclusive. Considering the heterogeneity of observational data on the effects of statin therapy on bone formation markers, BMD, and fracture risk, as well as the dynamic changes in human lipids and BMD, it is challenging to obtain and analyze these data in a clinical setting [151]. Coupled with the presence of many confounding factors in observational studies and differences in patient adherence to medications [160], the existing data are insufficient to fully support the beneficial effects of statin therapy in the prevention and treatment of bone health.
High serum cholesterol also promotes the development of osteoarthritis [141]. Studies have shown that patients with osteoarthritis have high levels of crystals and cholesterol in their synovial fluid [161]. APOE mice chronically fed a high-cholesterol diet developed more severe osteoarthritis (OA) in a dose-dependent manner than did mice fed a normal diet [162]. Furthermore, a recent study revealed that cholesterol and its metabolites increase the risk of osteoarthritis by up-regulating matrix-degrading enzymes in chondrocytes through the stimulation of retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptor-α (RORα) [163]. For osteoarthritis, clinical trials and animal studies have also demonstrated the protective effect of statins in relieving symptoms [164]. However, other cholesterol-lowering drugs have not shown a protective effect, so the role of statins in osteoarthritis treatment is more likely to result from their anti-inflammatory effects [165]. Further research is needed to investigate the role of low-cholesterol strategies in osteoarthritis.
In addition to the typical influence of lipid molecules on bone homeostasis, numerous studies over the past 20 years have examined the effects of adipose-derived hormones on bone homeostasis. Adipokines secreted into adipose tissue, such as leptin and adiponectin, have endocrine and paracrine effects on the survival and function of osteoblasts and osteoclasts. In addition to leptin and adiponectin, some newly discovered adipose-derived factors, such as visfatin, nesfatin-1, apelin, and vaspin, may also affect bone homeostasis, and there may be other adipokines that are currently being discovered [3]. This review focuses on the 2 most representative adipokines that have been shown to influence bone homeostasis, namely, leptin and adiponectin. It is worth noting that research on their effects on bone homeostasis has only just begun in the past 20 years, and the currently available evidence, including the inconsistent results reflected by some preclinical studies and limited clinical studies, also reflects the complex effects of these adipokines on bone homeostasis.
Leptin, a well-conserved nonglycosylated peptide, has a molecular weight of 16 kDa and consists of 146 amino acids. Leptin is produced by the leptin gene in adipose tissue [166]. Traditionally, leptin suppress appetite through the nervous system, reduces insulin sensitivity, inhibits fatty acid synthesis, and limits fat storage [167]. However, ongoing discoveries over the last 20 years have shown that leptin may regulate bone metabolism through central and peripheral regulation. The central mechanism proposes that leptin inhibits bone formation by stimulating the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) through the hypothalamus, and the peripheral mechanism involves leptin directly interacting with leptin receptors on osteogenic or osteoclastic progenitor cells, thereby affecting their activity and directing their differentiation.
Leptin and bone homeostasis: Osteoblasts: Initially, a series of experiments by Ducy and colleagues [168] revealed that in vivo, leptin inhibits bone formation, and mice in which leptin or leptin receptors are knocked out exhibit a high bone mass phenotype. Transplantation of normal adipose tissue to “fat-free” mice restores their skeletal phenotype, but transplantation of adipose tissue from leptin knockout mice cannot normalize the skeletal phenotype, supporting Ducy et al.'s view that leptin inhibits bone formation [169]. These results suggest that leptin produced by adipose tissue may suppress bone formation through multiple pathways. By genetically or pharmacologically ablating adrenergic signaling, which leads to leptin resistance and high bone mass, Takeda et al. [170] speculated that leptin may regulate bone metabolism through the SNS. Analysis of mice with defects in the β2-adrenergic receptor (Adrb2) confirmed that leptin primarily inhibits bone formation through the central nervous–sympathetic nervous system [170,171]. Specifically, leptin acts on ventromedial hypothalamus (VMH) nucleus neurons [172], which serve as a relay station to enhance SNS tone in bone. The SNS releases norepinephrine, which inhibits osteogenesis and bone formation by activating Adrb (Adrb2 in humans and Adrb1 in mice) on the surface of osteoblasts (Fig. 4).
Another possible mechanism is through its direct action on the surface receptors of stem cells, reversing the osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs toward adipogenic differentiation. BMSCs expressing leptin receptors are the main source of osteoblasts and adipocytes, which are usually quiescent. However, under external stimuli such as radiation or trauma, the activation of leptin receptors on BMSCs may lead to increased osteogenic, adipogenic, or chondrogenic differentiation [173]. Specific deletion of leptin receptors in BMSCs from the long bones of mice resulted in increased osteogenic differentiation and decreased adipogenic differentiation, with consistent results observed in vivo. The mineral deposition rate and bone formation rate of the long bones of the mice were significantly increased. Conversely, sustained elevation of the local leptin concentration in the skeleton led to up-regulation of adipogenic differentiation in BMSCs, with a decrease in the mineral attachment rate and bone formation rate of the long bones of mice, indicating that leptin receptor signaling promotes fat formation and inhibits osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs [174].
Osteoclasts: Consistent with the regulatory mechanisms governing osteoblasts, leptin may similarly modulate osteoclasts through 2 mechanisms mediated by the central nervous system and the peripheral neuroendocrine system. Primarily, leptin can activate a cascade of signaling pathways, including the Janus kinase 2 (JAK2)–signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), AMPK, and PI3K-AKT-FOXO1 pathways, via leptin receptors in the central nervous system, particularly in the hypothalamus. These pathways not only regulate energy metabolism but also influence bone metabolism by modulating the generation and function of osteoclasts [175]. For instance, studies have revealed that leptin inhibits AMPK signaling in the hypothalamus, thereby reducing osteoclastogenesis and activity and ultimately attenuating bone resorption [176,177].
Second, in peripheral tissues, leptin directly affects osteoclast behavior through autocrine and paracrine pathways. Leptin can directly act on osteoclasts and precursor cells, regulating their differentiation and function. For example, leptin can suppress the expression of RANKL in BMSCs and decrease osteoclast activation and generation by inhibiting RANKL signaling [178]. However, it is worth noting that Yue et al.'s [174] study also revealed that high concentrations of local leptin resulted in increased numbers of osteoclasts and significantly enhanced bone resorption in the distal metaphysis of the femur in mice, suggesting that leptin may also directly or indirectly up-regulate osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption.
Additionally, leptin may promote osteoclast apoptosis, reducing the number and activity of mature osteoclasts and thereby decreasing bone resorption. Several studies have explored the role of leptin in osteoclast apoptosis [179,180]. Leptin interacts with its receptors on osteoclasts, initiating signaling pathways that lead to apoptosis. For instance, it has been shown that leptin can induce apoptosis in osteoclasts through mechanisms involving the activation of proapoptotic pathways and the inhibition of anti-apoptotic proteins. This process helps to regulate the overall activity of osteoclasts, preventing excessive bone resorption, which can lead to conditions such as osteoporosis. One key mechanism by which leptin promotes osteoclast apoptosis is through the activation of caspases, which are crucial mediators of apoptosis [181].
Moreover, leptin may down-regulate the expression of markers associated with bone resorption, such as TRAP and acid phosphatase, further inhibiting the osteoclastic bone resorption capacity [178]. In postmenopausal women, correlations have been observed between serum leptin levels and markers of bone resorption, such as TRAP, acid phosphatase, and osteoclastic bone resorption capacity [182].
Osteocytes: In the regulation of bone homeostasis, leptin signaling in mature osteocytes shares many similarities with osteoblasts, regulating bone metabolism through both central and peripheral mechanisms [183]. On the one hand, leptin acts via the central nervous system, particularly the hypothalamus, to influence bone metabolism. It modulates the activity of the SNS, thereby affecting bone remodeling. Leptin binds to receptors in the hypothalamus, stimulating SNS activity, which leads to the release of norepinephrine. Norepinephrine acts on β-adrenergic receptors on bone cells, influencing bone resorption and formation. On the other hand, peripherally, leptin directly acts on bone cells, with its receptor expressed on osteocytes. The direct action of leptin regulates several intracellular signaling pathways: Leptin binding to specific receptor activates the JAK signal transducer and STAT pathway [184], which is crucial for transmitting leptin signals into the cell nucleus, leading to gene expression involved in cell survival, differentiation, and proliferation. Leptin also activates the PI3K/Akt pathway, playing a role in promoting osteocyte survival and preventing apoptosis [185]. This pathway enhances osteocytes' resistance to various stressors, thus maintaining skeletal integrity. Additionally, the Akt signaling pathway helps regulate the expression of bone cell-specific genes, including the key bone formation regulator, sclerostin (SCL). The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway is another crucial signaling cascade activated by leptin in bone cells. MAPK signaling is involved in regulating cellular responses to mechanical stress, which is essential for the mechanosensing functions of osteocytes [186]. Through this pathway, leptin helps bone cells respond to mechanical loads, promoting bone formation and remodeling. In summary, leptin plays a multifaceted role in bone cell signal transduction through central and peripheral mechanisms. By activating intracellular pathways such as JAK/STAT, PI3K/Akt, and MAPK, leptin influences osteocyte survival, mechanosensing capabilities, and the regulation of bone remodeling processes. Understanding these mechanisms provides valuable insights into the complex interactions between energy metabolism and skeletal health.
Clinical studies and applications of leptin: Currently, clinical studies on leptin are limited to investigating the correlation between serum leptin levels and various bone metabolism indices. Higher serum leptin concentrations and a positive correlation with body mass index (BMI) have been confirmed in obese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis [187,188]. Moreover, BMD increases with increasing BMI [188]. A meta-analysis of 45 studies showed a positive correlation between leptin levels and BMD and bone mineral content in postmenopausal women, indicating that leptin may be a bone tissue protective factor in postmenopausal women. However, these statistically significant differences may need to be interpreted with caution due to confounding factors such as leptin source and detection methods. A recent meta-analysis presented opposite results, indicating that serum leptin levels in postmenopausal women with decreased bone density tended to decrease compared with those in the control group with normal bone density [187].
It should be noted that there are numerous factors influencing the changes in bone mass in postmenopausal women, particularly after menopause, where the redistribution of various hormones and related receptors can lead to alterations in adipose tissue storage, serum leptin levels, and bone mass [189]; for instance, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) is considered to regulate gonadal functions and substantially participates in fat and bone metabolism [190]. Within the pituitary–gonadal axis, FSH stimulates osteoclast activation, while thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) inhibits osteoclast bone resorption. Adrenocorticotropic hormone promotes osteoblast activation and bone formation, whereas leptin-mediated SNS activation may negatively regulate bone remodeling [191]. The role of FSH in bone loss and fat increase may be more significant than that of leptin [192]. Therefore, when discussing the correlation between serum leptin levels and bone mass, it may be challenging to provide a definitive answer based on the current state of research.
Another important clinical application of studying the correlation between leptin and bone density is predicting the risk of osteoporosis, especially postmenopausal osteoporotic fractures. Adding other indicators may improve the accuracy of fracture risk prediction compared to using leptin alone [111]. Moreover, it is worth noting that the effect of serum leptin levels on osteoporotic fractures may vary by bone type and location. Mohiti-Ardekani et al. [193] found no significant correlation between serum leptin levels and BMD in either osteoporotic or non-osteoporotic groups when analyzing fasting serum leptin levels and lumbar spine BMD. In contrast, Meng et al.'s [183] Mendelian randomization study showed that higher serum circulating leptin levels were associated with decreased lumbar spine BMD but not with decreased femoral neck, forearm, or whole-body BMD.
In addition, leptin influences bone metabolism via the SNS, indicating that Adrb antagonists, which are commonly utilized for treating cardiovascular conditions, might have therapeutic benefits for osteoporosis. Recent attention has been given to how Adrb antagonists enhance bone density and lower the risk of osteoporotic fractures, garnering significant interest among medical professionals. Studies have demonstrated that Adrb antagonists can improve both bone density and trabecular architecture in postmenopausal women, particularly in critical areas such as the femoral neck [194]. Their use alone or in combination with other antihypertensive drugs decreases the risk of osteoporotic fractures to varying degrees [195197]. Notably, the effect of β-blockers on bone homeostasis varies depending on the subtype of the receptor. In rodents, β-blockers primarily act on Adrb2, while in humans, the primary target receptor for β-blockers is Adrb1 [198]. Therefore, selective β1-blockers may be more specific and effective in preventing and treating osteoporosis [198,199].
Multiple clinical studies have indicated that plasma, serum, and synovial fibroblast leptin levels affect OA progression [200]. Ait Eldjoudi et al. [200] and Min et al. [201] observed that leptin expression was greater in knee OA patients than in controls. Moreover, in the isolated articular cartilage of OA patients, leptin levels in synovial fibroblasts increase more markedly than do serum leptin levels, and both are positively correlated with BMI [200]. In addition, studies have shown that leptin up-regulates matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) production in articular cartilage involved in the progression of OA [202]. Body weight is an important risk factor for the incidence and progression of knee OA. Leptin levels are significantly greater in obese OA patients than in non-obese OA patients, demonstrating that leptin mediates the relationship between OA and obesity [203].
Moreover, leptin is also involved in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) [200]. However, clinical studies comparing leptin concentrations in serum or synovial fibroblasts from RA patients and healthy individuals have shown conflicting results. It has been reported that synovial fibroblast leptin concentrations are greater in patients with erosive RA than in those with nonerosive RA [204]. In addition, leptin has been shown to have strong proinflammatory effects in a mouse model of RA, and the use of leptin receptor antagonists has been shown to reduce the severity of the disease [205]. Numerous studies have demonstrated the ability of leptin to promote cartilage metabolism as well as systemic and local joint inflammatory responses, which provides further evidence of the key role of leptin in the pathogenesis and progression of RA and OA. However, some of the controversial results in published clinical studies may be due to the heterogeneity of clinical confounders in different study populations.
In summary, the effect of leptin on bone homeostasis is complex. The following highlights may be helpful in furthering our understanding of the effects of leptin on bone homeostasis: (a) Leptin may regulate bone homeostasis through both central and peripheral pathways, with central regulation involving the hypothalamus as a relay and acting through the SNS to modulate the differentiation and activity of bone cells; peripheral regulation occurs directly through leptin receptors on MSCs and/or osteoblasts. (b) The presence of multiple leptin receptor subtypes can lead to different cellular biological effects [206]. (c) Leptin may have different effects on different bone sites and types. (d) When exerting its effects in vivo, leptin faces a complex internal environment influenced by external factors. These factors can also affect the expression of other hormones, such as insulin and osteocalcin (OCN), thereby affecting bone metabolism differently [207]. In the future, further research on leptin and its receptors may provide potential therapeutic options for preventing and treating osteoporosis.
Although there are differences in the reported concentrations of adiponectin in serum, adiponectin is almost certainly the most abundant adipokine secreted by adipocytes in circulation [208210]. Adiponectin was originally identified in adipose tissue [211], but it was subsequently found that myocytes [212], osteoblasts [213], and other tissue cells can also produce adiponectin. However, adipose tissue and adipocytes, especially white adipose tissue and bone marrow adipose tissue, remain the main sources of serum adiponectin. The types of adiponectin in serum include full-length adiponectin and globular adiponectin. Full-length adiponectin mostly exists in oligomeric forms, including trimeric (low molecular weight), hexameric (medium molecular weight), and 12- or 18-mer (high molecular weight) forms. Globular adiponectins (gAds) are essentially 3 C-terminal globular domains that are tightly bound together by hydrophobic interactions within the trimeric core (Fig. 4). It can be generated by the cleavage of high-molecular-weight adiponectin by elastase from leukocytes [29,214]; therefore, high-molecular-weight adiponectin may serve as a reservoir of globular adiponectin [215]. The existence of various oligomeric structures of adiponectin endows it with multifaceted activities, and different oligomers act on different target tissues with distinct biological effects.
Adiponectin and bone homeostasis: Osteoblasts: In most preclinical studies, adiponectin signaling has been recognized to play a positive role in bone metabolism, as it is believed to promote osteoblast differentiation of BMSCs and preosteoblasts while inhibiting the activation and maturation of osteoclasts. Osteoblasts serve as direct targets of adiponectin, and adiponectin dose- and time-dependently promotes osteoblast proliferation and differentiation [216]. In vitro, adiponectin has been shown to enhance osteoblast differentiation and mineralization. This occurs through the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway, which is pivotal for cell survival and growth. For instance, adiponectin treatment increases oncostatin M expression [217] in osteoblasts via the PI3K/Akt pathway, further promoting osteogenic activities. The PI3K/Akt pathway is one of the most significant pathways facilitating the up-regulation of osteoblast differentiation markers and enhancing mineralization. This pathway activation is crucial for the survival and proliferation of osteoblasts [218].
Additionally, adiponectin influences the NF-κB pathway, which is known for its role in inflammatory responses and bone resorption processes. By modulating NF-κB activity, adiponectin can potentially reduce bone resorption and promote bone formation. Lee et al. [218] indicated that adiponectin enhances the expression of genes and proteins critical for osteoblast differentiation, such as RUNX2 and OCN, through its interaction with these signaling pathways. In addition, adiponectin has been shown to inhibit apoptosis in osteoblasts by modulating several intracellular signaling pathways, such as the AMPK and MAPK pathways. This inhibition of apoptosis leads to increased bone formation and reduced bone loss, thereby maintaining bone density [219,220]. In the study by Wu et al. [220], the in vitro addition of adiponectin to human periodontal ligament cell culture medium enhanced the expression of osteogenic-related genes, up-regulated the formation of mineralized nodules, and promoted osteogenic differentiation. In vivo, experiments in a number of animals have also verified the role of lipocalin in promoting osteoblast differentiation, and mice with adiponectin deficiency show a tendency for skull osteoblasts (primary osteoblasts) to differentiate into adipocytes rather than osteoblasts [221].
Osteoclasts: In the osteoclast lineage, primary BMMs from mice showed significant inhibition of proliferation and osteoclast differentiation with increasing concentrations of exogenous adiponectin during in vitro culture [222]. Similarly, adiponectin inhibited RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis in mouse RAW 264.7 cells and disrupted the formation of the F-actin ring through adiponectin receptor (adipoR), including adipoR1 and adipoR2 [213]. The signaling pathways involved may include the AMPK, PI3K/protein kinase B (PKB), MAPK, STAT3, mTOR, NF-κB, and PPARα pathways [223]. Silencing adipoR with small interfering RNA (siRNA) eliminates adiponectin-induced cell proliferation and activation [216]. There is extensive evidence from animal models supporting the positive role of adiponectin signaling in regulating bone homeostasis. In a rat tibial fracture model, local injection of adiponectin into the fracture site led to increased bone formation marker and adipoR1 expression, resulting in significantly accelerated bone healing in rats [224]. Adenovirus-mediated gene transfer of adiponectin improved peri-implant bone integration in ovariectomy-induced osteoporotic rats [225]. Pharmacological activation of adiponectin signaling reduced bone loss in a mouse model of inflammatory bone loss, supporting the role of adipoR1 activation in promoting osteogenesis and reducing adiposity and osteoclastogenesis [226,227] (Fig. 4).
Osteocytes: Adiponectin also plays a significant role in the regulation of bone metabolism by influencing the signaling pathways in mature osteocytes. Adiponectin binds to its receptors, AdipoR1 and AdipoR2, which are expressed on osteocytes, activating several intracellular signaling pathways and impacting osteocyte function and bone homeostasis [228]. One of the primary pathways activated by adiponectin is the AMPK pathway. AMPK is a key energy sensor that maintains cellular energy homeostasis. When adiponectin binds to its receptors on osteocytes, it activates AMPK, which subsequently enhances osteocyte survival and function [229]. Activation of AMPK promotes the expression of genes involved in autophagy and reduces oxidative stress, which is critical for maintaining osteocyte viability and preventing apoptosis under metabolic stress conditions [229]. Another crucial pathway influenced by adiponectin is the PPAR signaling pathway. Adiponectin enhances the activity of PPARγ, a nuclear receptor that regulates the expression of genes involved in lipid metabolism and inflammation [230]. Through PPARγ activation, adiponectin reduces the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and increases the expression of anti-inflammatory molecules. This anti-inflammatory effect helps to protect osteocytes from inflammation-induced damage, thereby supporting bone remodeling and maintenance. Moreover, adiponectin modulates the MAPK pathway, which is involved in the response to mechanical stress. By activating the MAPK pathway, adiponectin enhances the osteocytes' ability to sense and respond to mechanical loading, a critical function for bone strength and adaptation. This pathway contributes to the regulation of bone formation and resorption, ensuring proper bone remodeling in response to mechanical stimuli [231,232]. Additionally, adiponectin has been shown to influence the production of SCL, a protein secreted by osteocytes that inhibits bone formation [233]. By down-regulating SCL expression, adiponectin promotes osteoblast activity and bone formation. This regulatory mechanism is vital for balancing bone resorption and formation, contributing to overall bone health. In summary, adiponectin plays a multifaceted role in osteocyte signaling transduction, affecting bone metabolism through the activation of AMPK, PPAR, and MAPK pathways. These pathways collectively enhance osteocyte survival, reduce inflammation, improve mechanical sensing, and regulate bone remodeling processes.
Clinical studies and applications of adiponectin: However, inconsistent with preclinical findings, most clinical observations over the past decade show that adiponectin has a negative effect on bone homeostasis [234236]. Several meta-analyses have identified adiponectin as the most relevant adipokine negatively associated with postmenopausal osteoporosis [187,237]. Elevated levels of adiponectin may be associated with increased fracture risk in postmenopausal women [235] and suggest a high risk of vertebral fractures in men [237]. Clearly, these clinical observational studies are highly heterogeneous, and eliminating confounding factors such as sex, age, BMI, and disease status could lead to different conclusions.
Most studies on the pathogenesis of OA and RA suggest that adiponectin is a proinflammatory protein that plays an important role in the incidence and progression of OA and RA [238]. A meta-analysis by Tang et al. [239] indicated that the concentrations of adiponectin were greater in patients with OA than in healthy individuals and were also locally elevated in the synovium. In vitro experiments on synovial fibroblasts have shown that adiponectin triggers the generation of pro-MMP-1 and interleukin-6 (IL-6), which are key mediators of disruptive arthritis [238]. In addition, increased secretion of MMP-1, MMP-3 and MMP-13 was found in primary chondrocytes from OA patients after treatment with adiponectin [240]. Similarly, a number of studies have shown that adiponectin can activate the secretion of inflammatory mediators such as prostaglandin E2, IL-6, IL-8, MMP-1, and MMP-13 from synovial fibroblasts by stimulating adipoRs [238]. One hypothesis for the treatment of arthritis is to regulate adiponectin to reduce its adverse effects and promote its beneficial effects. However, the response of target cells to adiponectin stimulation may differ from patient to patient; therefore, the response to therapeutic measures may also differ. Therefore, further exploration of the mechanism of action of adiponectin may provide ideas for the development of personalized therapies based on the modulation of adiponectin activity.
Although conflicting conclusions exist between animal models and human studies, changing serum adiponectin levels or inducing adiponectin signal transduction through drugs may indeed have an effect on altering bone metabolism. Gong et al. [224] extracted highly purified and recombinant human adiponectin and used it for in vivo studies of bone marrow injection to accelerate bone healing, which may be a very meaningful first exploration of the drug effects and future clinical translation potential of human recombinant adiponectin. Further preclinical studies may be needed to clarify the specific mechanisms by which different adiponectin subtypes affect the biological state of bone cells and how the expression status of bone cell adipoR determines the response to adiponectin under various physiological or pathophysiological conditions. Moreover, large-scale, high-quality clinical studies could be highly beneficial for further clarifying the true role of adiponectin in bone. More importantly, recombinant human adiponectin and small molecule reagents targeting adipoR may provide potential clues for drug therapy for bone metabolic diseases.
Traditionally, bone is viewed as a structural organ that provides mechanical support, protects soft tissues, and enables movement. As one of the largest organ systems in the body, accounting for approximately 15% of total body weight, the function of the skeleton extends beyond structural support. Bone homeostasis affects lipid metabolism in at least 2 distinct ways. First, from a macroscopic perspective, the metabolic competition theory posits that when the energy demand of bone tissue increases, it will consume a large amount of lipids from circulation to meet its metabolic needs, leading to changes in the overall lipid metabolism state. Second, from a microscopic perspective, skeletal cells secrete osteogenic cytokines, which have profound effects on fat metabolism through paracrine or endocrine mechanisms.
The skeletal system and its bone marrow components require substantial energy daily to regulate hematopoiesis and renewal, and to maintain bone mass. In adults, the skeleton experiences daily microfractures that require immediate repair. The fundamental process of bone homeostasis involves the active removal of bone by osteoclasts, followed by the replenishment of new bone by osteoblasts [241,242]. This closely coordinated process requires a significant amount of energy. As mentioned earlier, lipid metabolism is an crucial source of energy for bone remodeling. Considering the contradiction between the “energy demand” of bone remodeling and the “energy storage” of lipids, it can be inferred that changes in bone homeostasis will inevitably lead to changes in overall lipid metabolism [243]. When bone remodeling is activated, osteoblasts and osteoclasts rapidly obtain free fatty acids, triglycerides, cholesterol, or lipoprotein particles from the circulation to meet the increased energy demand of bone cells, which can be further metabolized through lipolysis and β-oxidation. These procedures lead to decreased lipid accumulation in peripheral cells and tissues, such as adipocytes in adipose tissue, hepatocytes in the liver, and myocytes in muscle tissue. Conversely, when bone remodeling slows, the energy demand of bone tissue decreases, resulting in a relative decrease in the availability of lipids and lipid substrates from circulation, leading to increased lipid storage in peripheral tissues.
The following evidence may support the theory of bone-lipid metabolic competition: First, the blood circulation in bone tissue is very rich, with bone receiving approximately 1/10 of the total cardiac output, ensuring that bone can obtain a large amount of lipids from circulation [244]. Niemeier et al. [245] have shown that osteoblasts and bones are second only to the liver in their uptake of circulating lipoproteins and free fatty acids. Second, animal models have shown that the development of high bone mass or low bone mass phenotypes is accompanied by changes in fat storage and metabolism. By genetically manipulating the expression of SCL in mice, there is a mutual “antagonistic” relationship between bone tissue formation and fat tissue deposition in mice [246]. Specific disruption of CPT-2 in osteoblasts and osteocytes in mice resulted in severe bone formation impairment, with significant lipid abnormalities due to obstruction of fatty acid utilization in osteoblasts and osteocytes. This suggests that when lipid utilization in bone cells decreases, the organism undergoes a redistribution of energy resources [35,37]. In addition, some clinical observational studies may also support the existence of a “competition” mechanism between bone homeostasis and lipid metabolism. Osteoporotic patients receiving teriparatide treatment showed improvements in bone density accompanied by decreases in triglycerides, weight, and BMI, indicating enhanced fat decomposition and utilization during bone formation [247]. A comparison of bone tissues extracted from patients with osteoporotic fractures, patients with osteoarthritis, and healthy autopsies revealed reduced bone formation. Meanwhile, key enzymes related to triglyceride metabolism, such as lipoprotein lipase and hormone-sensitive lipase, were expressed at lower levels, indicating reduced bone formation and decreased triglyceride breakdown and metabolism in bone tissue [248]. Based on the above evidence, a metabolically active skeletal system helps eliminate the adverse effects of lipid accumulation in other tissues and organs of the body; in other words, healthier bone function leads to better lipid metabolism. From a clinical pharmacotherapy perspective, improving the state of skeletal metabolism is a potential option for optimizing the lipid profile and reducing inappropriate fat accumulation.
Recent research has increased interest in cytokines derived from bone tissue, highlighting their role as endocrine or paracrine organs. Bone secretes numerous cytokines, with some already identified and others under investigation. These cytokines can significantly influence the metabolism of glucose, lipids, proteins, and inorganic salts across various tissues, organs, or systems. This review concentrates on 3 bone-derived cytokines closely linked to lipid metabolism: OCN, lipocalin-2 (LCN-2), and SCL.
OCN, the most prevalent noncollagenous protein in the bone matrix, is primarily produced by osteoblasts. It comprises 46 to 50 amino acids and undergoes posttranslational modifications, including vitamin K-dependent gamma carboxylation. The undercarboxylated form of OCN (Un-OCN) functions as an endocrine hormone in mammals, exhibiting a broad spectrum of biological effects. Un-OCN is known to enhance insulin sensitivity and glucose regulation, modulate lipid metabolism, boost male fertility, support memory and learning, increase exercise capacity, and play a role in acute stress responses. The endocrine functions of Un-OCN are attributed to its interaction with receptors such as GPR158 in the central nervous system and GPRC6A in peripheral tissues.
Originally, research on OCN primarily focused on its role in glucose metabolism, so it is unsurprising that alterations in glucose processing could indirectly influence lipid metabolism and adiposity. Un-OCN has been shown to suppress the expression of genes such as sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1c and carbohydrate response element-binding protein in pancreatic islet β cells, thereby encouraging β cell proliferation. Conversely, in non-islet tissues, Un-OCN enhances glucose utilization and boosts cellular insulin sensitivity [249]. Moreover, Un-OCN can mitigate endoplasmic reticulum stress by activating the PI3K/Akt/NF-κB signaling pathway, thereby ameliorating insulin resistance in adipocytes. This leads to increased glucose utilization and decreased fat accumulation in cells [250]. In addition to indirectly affecting lipid and energy metabolism by modifying tissue cell sensitivity to insulin, Un-OCN also directly impacts lipid metabolism. A study by Otani et al. [251] demonstrated that Un-OCN up-regulates the expression of lipocalin and PPARγ in adipocytes. Subsequent in vivo experiments indicated that intermittent oral administration of Un-OCN reduced adipocyte volume in mice. These researchers also discovered that high doses of Un-OCN suppressed lipocalin and PPARγ expression in adipocytes, initiating necroptosis by enhancing FasL expression on adipocyte plasma membranes and activating Fas signaling in neighboring cells [252]. Additionally, Un-OCN plays a role in thermogenesis in brown adipocytes. Li et al. [253] used an in vitro model to confirm the specific function of osteocalcin in activating thermogenic genes in brown adipocytes (Fig. 5).
The regulation of lipid metabolism by Un-OCN in peripheral tissues occurs through GPRC6A on the cell membrane surface [254,255]. By conditionally deleting GPRC6A from male mouse hepatocytes, mouse liver cells were found to undergo steatosis, and cholesterol and triglycerides were deposited in hepatocytes [256]. Importantly, a recent study highlighted the effects of adipocyte-specific GPRC6A knockout in mice. These genetically modified animals, when subjected to a high-fat and high-sucrose diet, displayed significant increases in adipose tissue weight, adipocyte hypertrophy, and inflammation within the adipose tissue compared to their control counterparts. This finding underscores the critical role of the GPRC6A receptor in regulating adipose tissue responses and metabolic processes under diet-induced stress conditions [257]. In the central nervous system, Un-OCN has the ability to cross the blood–brain barrier and bind to the GPR158 receptor in the hippocampus. This interaction promotes the release of various neurotransmitters, subsequently influencing behaviors such as anxiety, cognition, and stress responses. This mechanism highlights the broader systemic effects of Un-OCN beyond its metabolic and bone-related functions, demonstrating its role in neural processes and behavioral regulation [258], as well as its indirect effects on glucose and lipid metabolism.
Overall, impaired Un-OCN mechanisms may lead to abnormal fat accumulation in peripheral organs and tissues such as the liver, skeletal muscle, and fat, which ultimately leads to metabolic syndrome. Several clinical observational studies have shown a correlation between reduced secretion of Un-OCN and disorders of lipid metabolism [259261]. Zheng et al. [259] reported that decreased Un-OCN levels in children with osteogenesis imperfecta were accompanied by imbalances in glucose and fat metabolism, hyperglycemia, and obesity. Bao et al. [260] found that an increase in serum osteocalcin levels was accompanied by a decrease in triglyceride levels, insulin resistance index, and a reduction in visceral fat accumulation. The above findings suggest that serum Un-OCN may be useful for screening for metabolic diseases, and more importantly, regulating the secretion of Un-OCN from skeletal cells may be a potential solution for the treatment of lipid metabolism disorders and metabolic syndrome in the future.
Researchers have recently worked to identify bone-derived cytokines other than OCN that affect energy metabolism. Studies have revealed that the specific ablation of osteoblasts in adult mice leads to hyperglycemia, impaired glucose tolerance, and reduced insulin sensitivity. Although supplementation with osteocalcin ameliorated glucose intolerance, it only partially restored insulin sensitivity and had no impact on gonadal fat weight or energy expenditure in osteoblast-depleted mice [262]. These observations imply that osteoblasts might secrete additional hormones or cytokines that enable bones to regulate energy metabolism. Rached et al. [263] found a substantial increase in LCN-2 expression in mice with specific knockdown of forkhead box protein O1 (FOXO1) in osteoblasts. A subsequent study showed that the application of FOXO1 siRNA down-regulated FOXO1 expression in rat osteoblasts, followed by the up-regulation of LCN-2 expression, which positively affected glucose metabolism [264]. These results provide compelling evidence for the role of the FOXO1/LCN-2 signaling pathway in osteoblasts in the regulation of energy metabolism. LCN-2, also known as neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, is a secreted glycoprotein initially identified as an adipokine [265]. Although it is produced by neutrophils and various tissues, such as the liver, bone marrow, uterus, prostate, stomach, lung, colon, and adipose tissue, expression profiling has shown that LCN-2 is expressed at least 10 times more abundantly in bone than in adipose tissue or any other tissue. This high expression level in bone highlights its potential role in bone physiology and systemic energy metabolism [266,267].
Overall, LCN-2 may regulate lipid metabolism in the following 3 ways. First, LCN-2 secreted by osteoblasts plays a crucial role in maintaining glucose homeostasis by inducing insulin secretion, which improves glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity. These changes indirectly affect lipid metabolism. Experimental findings indicate that silencing LCN-2 expression exacerbates metabolic dysfunction in both genetically obese and diet-induced obese mice. Conversely, overexpression of LCN-2 aids in maintaining glucose tolerance, reduces dyslipidemia, and prevents hepatic lipid accumulation and steatosis [268]. Increasing circulating LCN-2 levels has also been shown to improve metabolic parameters and promote β cell function in models of β cell failure [269]. Conversely, global genetic knockout of LCN-2 in mice leads to accelerated weight gain and visceral fat accumulation over time compared to wild-type controls [270,271]. Interestingly, while complete LCN-2 knockout increases glucose tolerance, it does not alter insulin sensitivity. However, osteoblast-specific LCN-2 knockout mice displayed reduced glucose tolerance and impaired insulin sensitivity [267], suggesting that osteoblast-derived LCN-2 up-regulation serves as a protective mechanism that enhances glucose metabolism and reduces fat accumulation (Fig. 5). Second, LCN-2 can cross the blood–brain barrier and interact with melanocortin 4 receptors (MC4Rs) in hypothalamic paraventricular and ventral medial neurons, activating pathways that induce anorexia [267,272]. Radiolabeled recombinant human LCN-2 (rh-LCN-2) administered to primates localized to the hypothalamus, as confirmed by brain positron emission tomography (PET) scans and radiographic autoradiography. Treatment with rh-LCN-2 also led to reduced food intake in these animals. This role of LCN-2 as a satiety factor underlines its significance in regulating feeding behaviors [272]. In addition, LCN-2 is crucial for the thermogenesis of brown adipose tissue [268,273275]. A deficiency in LCN-2 leads to reduced thermogenic activity in brown adipocytes, characterized by decreased levels of brown adipose tissue markers and diminished mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation [273]. In contrast, LCN-2 overexpression in mice prevents age-related decreases in adipose tissue thermogenesis and disruptions in adipose metabolism [268]. These varied roles of LCN-2 in metabolic regulation highlight its potential as a target for therapeutic interventions in metabolic disorders.
Some animal models of diseases have revealed a link between lipid metabolism imbalance and LCN-2 levels. LCN-2 is robustly up-regulated in mouse models of pancreatic cancer, and LCN-2 levels are associated with adiposity, lean body mass depletion, tumor cachexia, and mortality. Mice with genetic deletion of LCN-2 exhibit increased inguinal adiposity and body weight [276]. Recent clinical observations revealed that human circulating LCN-2 was negatively correlated with serum triglycerides and positively correlated with HDL cholesterol [277]. The above evidence suggests that LCN-2 may be a meaningful serological indicator of lipid metabolism disorders and a new target for improving fat metabolism and treating obesity.
SCL is a glycoprotein secreted by mature osteocytes, encoded by the sclerosteosis (SOST) gene. Although SCL is present in various tissues and organs, it is produced in particularly high quantities in bone tissue [278]. In recent years, growing evidence from in vitro studies, animal experiments, and clinical trials has demonstrated that SCL plays a significant role in regulating lipid metabolism.
In vitro studies have shown that recombinant SCL induces adipocyte differentiation [279281]. The addition of SCL to conditioned medium significantly enhances the adipogenic differentiation of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes and primary BMSCs [280,281]. Mechanistically, the pro-lipidemic effect of SCL is due to the inhibition of the Wnt signaling pathway and a subsequent increase in PPARγ gene expression [280] (Fig. 5). More specifically, SCL binds to the primary adipocyte membrane surface GPR Lrp4/5/6 and reduces typical β-linked protein signaling, resulting in enhanced lipogenic differentiation [282]. In particular, Lrp4 plays an important role in enhancing the differentiation of adipocytes in vitro [282,283]. In vivo experiments revealed that SCL plays a role in facilitating adipogenesis. Studies involving SOST knockout mice, as well as mice treated with SCL-neutralizing antibodies, revealed a significant reduction in whole-body adiposity [246]. Additionally, in the white adipose tissue of SOST knockout mice, not only was there a general decrease in fat accumulation, but the individual adipocytes were also smaller. In contrast, mice that overexpress SCL by adenovirus [246] or are additionally injected with recombinant SCL [284] exhibited an increase in whole-body adiposity, an increase in the weight of a single fat pad, and an increase in the size of individual adipocytes, while the expression of Wnt target genes appeared to be down-regulated.
Clinical studies have provided evidence that serum SCL levels are positively associated with body fat mass and lipid profile markers. For example, patients with congenital generalized lipodystrophy, who typically struggle with lipid storage in adipocytes and exhibit low body fat, have been found to have elevated serum SCL levels [285]. In elderly individuals, serum SCL is positively correlated with total adiposity and BMI in both men and women and specifically correlated with vertebral bone marrow fat content in men [286]. Among postmenopausal women, higher serum SCL levels have been linked to increased body weight, BMI, and overall adiposity [287]. Additionally, recent research indicates that maternal SCL is positively correlated with fetal abdominal circumference and subcutaneous fat deposition, which contribute to higher birth weight [288]. Nevertheless, because the above clinical studies are cross-sectional/case–control studies and because of the technical uncertainties of current circulating SCL assay methods [289], these works need to be interpreted with caution; however, the above evidence suggests that there is indeed an overall positive correlation between SCL and adipogenesis. Notably, before SCL can be used in clinical applications, the following issues may need to be considered: first, whether there are coordinated or antagonistic effects of other signaling molecules on the regulation of adipocyte differentiation and adipose tissue formation by SCL, and second, whether the physiological concentrations of SCL that regulate adipocyte behavior in vivo and in vitro are affected. In addition, the degree of importance of SCL relative to other endocrine and paracrine factors in disease needs to be further determined.
Drawing from the aforementioned findings, we offer a perspective on future research focuses and potential challenges in the realm of bone–lipid interactions. In the domain of basic research, leveraging advancements in mass spectrometry and chemical imaging techniques will significantly expand our understanding of how lipid metabolism impacts bone homeostasis. This approach holds promise for identifying novel lipid signals that enhance bone quality and promote human health. Delving into the intricacies of lipid signal transduction and regulatory mechanisms could unveil potential drug targets for bone metabolism disorders. However, the exact effects of bone-derived cytokines on whole-body metabolism remain uncertain. Their precise role in lipid metabolism remains ambiguous—whether they exert a decisive influence or merely function as a minor component within the complex internal environment of the human body. It is plausible that bone-derived cytokines play a supporting role in metabolic changes primarily governed by other hormones. In the future, large-scale genetic screening coupled with bioinformatics predictions may shed light on previously unknown regulators of bone-derived factors involved in lipid metabolism. This holistic approach could deepen our understanding of bone-lipid interactions and contribute to the development of targeted interventions for metabolic disorders with implications for bone health.
From a translational medicine standpoint, certain lipid-related molecules hold potential as reliable biomarkers for evaluating bone metabolism and predicting the risk of bone metabolic disorders, such as osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. Conversely, bone-derived factors may also serve as biomarkers for metabolic diseases, including lipid metabolism disorders. Although their current predictive value may seem limited, the primary bottleneck lies in the scarcity of comprehensive clinical studies, with future high-quality randomized controlled trials showing promising prospects. Further advancements in precision and efficacy related to lipid interventions have the potential to enhance bone metabolism and promote human health. Bone-derived hormones and their receptors could emerge as novel targets for addressing metabolic diseases and their associated complications. Existing evidence supports the notion that regulating the composition and proportion of various fatty acids in the diet, along with enhancing blood lipid profiles through statins, exogenous bone-derived hormone analogs, or small-molecule interventions targeting their receptors, can yield beneficial effects on bone homeostasis and lipid metabolism. Nevertheless, it is essential to acknowledge that most of the evidence comes from basic research and animal models, and there remains a relative scarcity of effective clinical trials. Additionally, the specific implementation plans for these interventions, such as determining the optimal ratio for fatty acid regulation, identifying appropriate dosages and durations for statin use, and establishing suitable concentration levels and administration methods for exogenous hormones, present challenging issues that warrant thorough investigation and resolution.
Despite the remaining questions that require clarification, it is evident that a close metabolic relationship and intricate regulatory network exist between lipid metabolism and bone homeostasis. Interventions targeting lipid-related pathways significantly impact bone metabolism, with specific lipids and lipid-related molecules influencing osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation and function. Concurrently, alterations in bone homeostasis exert complex effects on lipid metabolism through mechanisms such as “energy competition” and “endocrine” signaling. Recognizing bone as a pivotal endocrine organ in the organism unveils further interactive information between bone and lipids. Further exploration in this direction is likely to yield valuable insights.
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (82002321, 82072425, 82272567, 82072498)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK2021650, BE2020666)
  • Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  • National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents (BX20230350)
  • Jiangsu Medical Research Project(ZD2022014)
  • Special Project of Diagnosis and Treatment Technology for Key Clinical Diseases in Suzhou(LCZX202003)
  • Program of Suzhou Health Commission(GSWS2022002)
  • National and Local Engineering Laboratory of New Functional Polymer Materials(SDGC2205)
  • Research Funds of Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM(2023IHM02007)
  • Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province(KYCX243339)
1.
Jeffery EC, Mann TLA, Pool JA, Zhao Z, Morrison SJ. Bone marrow and periosteal skeletal stem/progenitor cells make distinct contributions to bone maintenance and repair. Cell Stem Cell. 2022;29(11):1547–1561.e6.
2.
Ning K, Liu S, Yang B, Wang R, Man G, Wang DE, Xu H. Update on the effects of energy metabolism in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells differentiation. Mol Metab. 2022;58: Article 101450.
3.
Funcke JB, Scherer PE. Beyond adiponectin and leptin: Adipose tissue-derived mediators of inter-organ communication. J Lipid Res. 2019;60(10):1648–1684.
4.
Stern JH, Rutkowski JM, Scherer PE. Adiponectin, leptin, and fatty acids in the maintenance of metabolic homeostasis through adipose tissue crosstalk. Cell Metab. 2016;23(5):770–784.
5.
Kim H, Oh B, Park-Min KH. Regulation of osteoclast differentiation and activity by lipid metabolism. Cells. 2021;10(1):89.
6.
Pagnotti GM, Styner M, Uzer G, Patel VS, Wright LE, Ness KK, Guise TA, Rubin J, Rubin CT. Combating osteoporosis and obesity with exercise: Leveraging cell mechanosensitivity. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2019;15(6):339–355.
7.
Zhao P, Xu A, Leung WK. Obesity, bone loss, and periodontitis: The interlink. Biomol Ther. 2022;12(7):865.
8.
Piché ME, Tchernof A, Després JP. Obesity phenotypes, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases. Circ Res. 2020;126(11):1477–1500.
9.
Perdomo CM, Cohen RV, Sumithran P, Clément K, Frühbeck G. Contemporary medical, device, and surgical therapies for obesity in adults. Lancet. 2023;401(10382):1116–1130.
10.
Reid IR, Billington EO. Drug therapy for osteoporosis in older adults. Lancet. 2022;399(10329):1080–1092.
11.
Black DM, Rosen CJ. Clinical practice. Postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(3):254–262.
12.
Xu H, Wang W, Liu X, Huang W, Zhu C, Xu Y, Yang H, Bai J, Geng D. Targeting strategies for bone diseases: Signaling pathways and clinical studies. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):202.
13.
Li W, Yu L, Li W, Ge G, Ma Y, Xiao L, Qiao Y, Huang W, Huang W, Wei M, et al. Prevention and treatment of inflammatory arthritis with traditional Chinese medicine: Underlying mechanisms based on cell and molecular targets. Ageing Res Rev. 2023;89: Article 101981.
14.
Wegner T, Laskar R, Glorius F. Lipid mimetics: A versatile toolbox for lipid biology and beyond. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2022;71: Article 102209.
15.
van Gastel N, Stegen S, Eelen G, Schoors S, Carlier A, Daniëls VW, Baryawno N, Przybylski D, Depypere M, Stiers PJ, et al. Lipid availability determines fate of skeletal progenitor cells via SOX9. Nature. 2020;579(7797):111–117.
16.
Abshirini M, Ilesanmi-Oyelere BL, Kruger MC. Potential modulatory mechanisms of action by long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids on bone cell and chondrocyte metabolism. Prog Lipid Res. 2021;83: Article 101113.
17.
Vilaca T, Evans A, Gossiel F, Paggiosi M, Eastell R, Walsh JS. Fat, adipokines, bone structure and bone regulatory factors associations in obesity. Eur J Endocrinol. 2022;187(6):743–750.
18.
Kirk B, Feehan J, Lombardi G, Duque G. Muscle bone, and fat crosstalk: The biological role of myokines, osteokines, and adipokines. Curr Osteoporosis Rep. 2020;18(4):388–400.
19.
Wilting J, Becker J. The lymphatic vascular system: Much more than just a sewer. Cell Biosci. 2022;12(1):157.
20.
Hussain MM. Intestinal lipid absorption and lipoprotein formation. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2014;25(3):200–206.
21.
Stellaard F. From dietary cholesterol to blood cholesterol, physiological lipid fluxes, and cholesterol homeostasis. Nutrients. 2022;14(8):1643.
22.
Peng Y, Wu S, Li Y, Crane JL. Type H blood vessels in bone modeling and remodeling. Theranostics. 2020;10(1):426–436.
23.
Kusumbe AP, Ramasamy SK, Adams RH. Coupling of angiogenesis and osteogenesis by a specific vessel subtype in bone. Nature. 2014;507(7492):323–328.
24.
Xu R, Yallowitz A, Qin A, Wu Z, Shin DY, Kim JM, Debnath S, Ji G, Bostrom MP, Yang X, et al. Targeting skeletal endothelium to ameliorate bone loss. Nat Med. 2018;24(6):823–833.
25.
Zhang J, Pan J, Jing W. Motivating role of type H vessels in bone regeneration. Cell Prolif. 2020;53(9): Article e12874.
26.
Levental KR, Surma MA, Skinkle AD, Lorent JH, Zhou Y, Klose C, Chang JT, Hancock JF, Levental I. ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids direct differentiation of the membrane phenotype in mesenchymal stem cells to potentiate osteogenesis. Sci Adv. 2017;3(11):eaao1193.
27.
Bispo DSC, Michálková L, Correia M, Jesus CSH, Duarte IF, Goodfellow BJ, Oliveira MB, Mano JF, Gil AM. Endo- and exometabolome crosstalk in mesenchymal stem cells undergoing osteogenic differentiation. Cells. 2022;11(8):1257.
28.
Adamek G, Felix R, Guenther HL, Fleisch H. Fatty acid oxidation in bone tissue and bone cells in culture. Characterization and hormonal influences. Biochem J. 1987;248(1):129–137.
29.
Li Z, Bowers E, Zhu J, Yu H, Hardij J, Bagchi DP, Mori H, Lewis KT, Granger K, Schill RL, et al. Lipolysis of bone marrow adipocytes is required to fuel bone and the marrow niche during energy deficits. eLife. 2022;11:e78496.
30.
Hao JW, Wang J, Guo H, Zhao YY, Sun HH, Li YF, Lai XY, Zhao N, Wang X, Xie C, et al. CD36 facilitates fatty acid uptake by dynamic palmitoylation-regulated endocytosis. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):4765.
31.
Kevorkova O, Martineau C, Martin-Falstrault L, Sanchez-Dardon J, Brissette L, Moreau R. Low-bone-mass phenotype of deficient mice for the cluster of differentiation 36 (CD36). PLOS ONE. 2013;8(10): Article e77701.
32.
Akhmetshina A, Kratky D, Rendina-Ruedy E. Influence of cholesterol on the regulation of osteoblast function. Metabolites. 2023;13(4):578.
33.
Colucci S, Mori G, Vaira S, Brunetti G, Greco G, Mancini L, Simone GM, Sardelli F, Koverech A, Zallone A, et al. L-carnitine and isovaleryl L-carnitine fumarate positively affect human osteoblast proliferation and differentiation in vitro. Calcif Tissue Int. 2005;76(6):458–465.
34.
Fujisawa K, Takami T, Fukui Y, Quintanilha LF, Matsumoto T, Yamamoto N, Sakaida I. Evaluating effects of L-carnitine on human bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Tissue Res. 2017;368(2):301–310.
35.
Kim SP, Li Z, Zoch ML, Frey JL, Bowman CE, Kushwaha P, Ryan KA, Goh BC, Scafidi S, Pickett JE, et al. Fatty acid oxidation by the osteoblast is required for normal bone acquisition in a sex- and diet-dependent manner. JCI Insight. 2017;2(16):e92704.
36.
Sui B, Ding T, Wan X, Chen Y, Zhang X, Cui Y, Pan J, Li L, Liu X. Piezoelectric stimulation enhances bone regeneration in alveolar bone defects through metabolic reprogramming of macrophages. Exploration. 2024.
37.
Frey JL, Li Z, Ellis JM, Zhang Q, Farber CR, Aja S, Wolfgang MJ, Clemens TL, Riddle RC. Wnt-Lrp5 signaling regulates fatty acid metabolism in the osteoblast. Mol Cell Biol. 2015;35(11):1979–1991.
38.
Li H, Long C, Hong Y, Luo L, Zuo Y. Characterizing cellular differentiation potency and Waddington landscape via energy indicator. Research. 2023;6:0118.
39.
Harasymowicz NS, Dicks A, Wu CL, Guilak F. Physiologic and pathologic effects of dietary free fatty acids on cells of the joint. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2019;1440(1):36–53.
40.
Saini RK, Keum YS. Omega-3 and omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids: Dietary sources, metabolism, and significance—A review. Life Sci. 2018;203:255–267.
41.
Valenti MT, Mattè A, Federti E, Puder M, Anez-Bustillos L, Deiana M, Cheri S, Minoia A, Brugnara C, Di Paolo ML, et al. Dietary ω-3 fatty acid supplementation improves murine sickle cell bone disease and reprograms adipogenesis. Antioxidants. 2021;10(5):799.
42.
Kim BJ, Yoo HJ, Park SJ, Kwak MK, Lee SH, Kim SJ, Hamrick MW, Isales CM, Ahn SH, Koh JM. Association of blood n-3 fatty acid with bone mass and bone marrow TRAP-5b in the elderly with and without hip fracture. Osteoporosis Int. 2019;30(5):1071–1078.
43.
Ma J, Kitaura H, Ogawa S, Ohori F, Noguchi T, Marahleh A, Nara Y, Pramusita A, Kinjo R, Kanou K, et al. Docosahexaenoic acid inhibits TNF-α-induced osteoclast formation and orthodontic tooth movement through GPR120. Front Immunol. 2022;13: Article 929690.
44.
Wang L, Zhang C, Liang H, Zhou N, Huang T, Zhao Z, Luo X. Polyunsaturated fatty acids level and bone mineral density: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study. Front Endocrinol. 2022;13: Article 858851.
45.
Yue H, Bo Y, Tian Y, Mao L, Xue C, Dong P, Wang J. Docosahexaenoic acid-enriched phosphatidylcholine exerted superior effects to triglyceride in ameliorating obesity-induced osteoporosis through up-regulating the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. J Agric Food Chem. 2022;70(43):13904–13912.
46.
Kasonga AE, Kruger MC, Coetzee M. Free fatty acid receptor 4-β-arrestin 2 pathway mediates the effects of different classes of unsaturated fatty acids in osteoclasts and osteoblasts. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids. 2019;1864(3):281–289.
47.
van Heerden B, Kasonga A, Kruger MC, Coetzee M. Palmitoleic acid inhibits RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption by suppressing NF-κB and MAPK signalling pathways. Nutrients. 2017;9(5):441.
48.
Gao B, Han YH, Wang L, Lin YJ, Sun Z, Lu WG, Hu YQ, Li JQ, Lin XS, Liu BH, et al. Eicosapentaenoic acid attenuates dexamethasome-induced apoptosis by inducing adaptive autophagy via GPR120 in murine bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Death Dis. 2016;7(5): Article e2235.
49.
Uccelli A, Moretta L, Pistoia V. Mesenchymal stem cells in health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8(9):726–736.
50.
Zhuang H, Zhang X, Zhu C, Tang X, Yu F, Shang GW, Cai X. Molecular mechanisms of PPAR-γ governing MSC osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2016;11(3):255–264.
51.
Casado-Díaz A, Ferreiro-Vera C, Priego-Capote F, Dorado G, Luque-de-Castro MD, Quesada-Gómez JM. Effects of arachidonic acid on the concentration of hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acids in culture media of mesenchymal stromal cells differentiating into adipocytes or osteoblasts. Genes Nutr. 2014;9(1):375.
52.
Chen F, Wang Y, Wang H, Dong Z, Wang Y, Zhang M, Li J, Shao S, Yu C, Huan Z, et al. Flaxseed oil ameliorated high-fat-diet-induced bone loss in rats by promoting osteoblastic function in rat primary osteoblasts. Nutr Metab. 2019;16:71.
53.
Cao L, Zhou S, Qiu X, Qiu S. Trehalose improves palmitic acid-induced apoptosis of osteoblasts by regulating SIRT3-medicated autophagy via the AMPK/mTOR/ULK1 pathway. FASEB J. 2022;36(9): Article e22491.
54.
Al Saedi A. Rapamycin affects palmitate-induced lipotoxicity in osteoblasts by modulating apoptosis and autophagy. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020;75(1):58–63.
55.
Al Saedi A, Bermeo S, Plotkin L, Myers DE, Duque G. Mechanisms of palmitate-induced lipotoxicity in osteocytes. Bone. 2019;127:353–359.
56.
Wang C, Wang J, Chen K, Pang H, Li X, Zhu J, Ma Y, Qiu T, Li W, Xie J, et al. Caprylic acid (C8:0) promotes bone metastasis of prostate cancer by dysregulated adipo-osteogenic balance in bone marrow. Cancer Sci. 2020;111(10):3600–3612.
57.
Jain S, Rai R, Singh D, Vohora D. Octanoic acid a major component of widely consumed medium-chain triglyceride ketogenic diet is detrimental to bone. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):7003.
58.
Kondo T, Chiba T, Tousen Y. Short-chain fatty acids, acetate and propionate, directly upregulate osteoblastic differentiation. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2022;73(6):800–808.
59.
Wallimann A, Magrath W, Pugliese B, Stocker N, Westermann P, Heider A, Gehweiler D, Zeiter S, Claesson MJ, Richards RG, et al. Butyrate inhibits osteoclast activity in vitro and regulates systemic inflammation and bone healing in a murine osteotomy model compared to antibiotic-treated mice. Mediat Inflamm. 2021;2021:8817421.
60.
Kishikawa A, Kitaura H, Kimura K, Ogawa S, Qi J, Shen WR, Ohori F, Noguchi T, Marahleh A, Nara Y, et al. Docosahexaenoic acid inhibits inflammation-induced osteoclast formation and bone resorption in vivo through GPR120 by inhibiting TNF-α production in macrophages and directly inhibiting osteoclast formation. Front Endocrinol. 2019;10:157.
61.
Park-Min KH. Metabolic reprogramming in osteoclasts. Semin Immunopathol. 2019;41(5):565–572.
62.
Sithole C, Pieterse C, Howard K, Kasonga A. GPR120 inhibits RANKL-induced osteoclast formation and resorption by attenuating reactive oxygen species production in RAW264.7 murine macrophages. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(19):10544.
63.
Nakanishi A, Tsukamoto I. N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids stimulate osteoclastogenesis through PPARγ-mediated enhancement of c-Fos expression, and suppress osteoclastogenesis through PPARγ-dependent inhibition of NFkB activation. J Nutr Biochem. 2015;26(11):1317–1327.
64.
Kasonga A, Kruger MC, Coetzee M. Activation of PPARs modulates signalling pathways and expression of regulatory genes in osteoclasts derived from human CD14+ monocytes. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(7):1798.
65.
Drosatos-Tampakaki Z, Drosatos K, Siegelin Y, Gong S, Khan S, Van Dyke T, Goldberg IJ, Schulze PC, Schulze-Späte U. Palmitic acid and DGAT1 deficiency enhance osteoclastogenesis, while oleic acid-induced triglyceride formation prevents it. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29(5):1183–1195.
66.
Oh SR, Sul OJ, Kim YY, Kim HJ, Yu R, Suh JH, Choi HS. Saturated fatty acids enhance osteoclast survival. J Lipid Res. 2010;51(5):892–899.
67.
Philippe C, Wauquier F, Landrier JF, Bonnet L, Miot-Noirault E, Rochefort GY, Sadoine J, Asrih M, Jornayvaz FR, Bernalier A, et al. GPR40 mediates potential positive effects of a saturated fatty acid enriched diet on bone. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2017;61(2):1600219.
68.
Kim HJ, Yoon HJ, Kim SY, Yoon YR. A medium-chain fatty acid, capric acid, inhibits RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation via the suppression of NF-κB signaling and blocks cytoskeletal organization and survival in mature osteoclasts. Mol Cells. 2014;37(8):598–604.
69.
Li X, Yuan C, Yang B, Pang H, Li W, Li M, Tang Y, Ma D, Xie J, Wang J, et al. Caprylic acid (FFA C8:0) promotes the progression of prostate cancer by up-regulating G protein-coupled receptor 84/ Krüppel-like factor 7. BMC Cancer. 2023;23(1):426.
70.
Wu YL, Zhang CH, Teng Y, Pan Y, Liu NC, Liu PX, Zhu X, Su XL, Lin J. Propionate and butyrate attenuate macrophage pyroptosis and osteoclastogenesis induced by CoCrMo alloy particles. Mil Med Res. 2022;9(1):46.
71.
Lucas S, Omata Y, Hofmann J, Böttcher M, Iljazovic A, Sarter K, Albrecht O, Schulz O, Krishnacoumar B, Krönke G, et al. Short-chain fatty acids regulate systemic bone mass and protect from pathological bone loss. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):55.
72.
Montalvany-Antonucci CC, Duffles LF, de Arruda JAA, Zicker MC, de Oliveira S, Macari S, Garlet GP, Madeira MFM, Fukada SY, Andrade I Jr, et al. Short-chain fatty acids and FFAR2 as suppressors of bone resorption. Bone. 2019;125:112–121.
73.
Rossi F, Tortora C, Punzo F, Bellini G, Argenziano M, Di Paola A, Torella M, Perrotta S. The endocannabinoid/endovanilloid system in bone: From osteoporosis to osteosarcoma. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(8):1919.
74.
Preston Mason R. New insights into mechanisms of action for omega-3 fatty acids in atherothrombotic cardiovascular disease. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2019;21(1):2.
75.
Qian C, Wang Q, Qiao Y, Xu Z, Zhang L, Xiao H, Lin Z, Wu M, Xia W, Yang H, et al. Arachidonic acid in aging: New roles for old players. J Adv Res. 2024.
76.
Bao M, Zhang K, Wei Y, Hua W, Gao Y, Li X, Ye L. Therapeutic potentials and modulatory mechanisms of fatty acids in bone. Cell Prolif. 2020;53(2): Article e12735.
77.
Huang S, Rutkowsky JM, Snodgrass RG, Ono-Moore KD, Schneider DA, Newman JW, Adams SH, Hwang DH. Saturated fatty acids activate TLR-mediated proinflammatory signaling pathways. J Lipid Res. 2012;53(9):2002–2013.
78.
Legrand P, Rioux V. The complex and important cellular and metabolic functions of saturated fatty acids. Lipids. 2010;45(10):941–946.
79.
Nagao K, Yanagita T. Medium-chain fatty acids: Functional lipids for the prevention and treatment of the metabolic syndrome. Pharmacol Res. 2010;61(3):208–212.
80.
Schönfeld P, Wojtczak L. Short- and medium-chain fatty acids in energy metabolism: The cellular perspective. J Lipid Res. 2016;57(6):943–954.
81.
Augustin K, Khabbush A, Williams S, Eaton S, Orford M, Cross JH, Heales SJR, Walker MC, Williams RSB. Mechanisms of action for the medium-chain triglyceride ketogenic diet in neurological and metabolic disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17(1):84–93.
82.
Huang S-C, He Y-F, Chen P, Liu K-L, Shaukat A. Gut microbiota as a target in the bone health of livestock and poultry: Roles of short-chain fatty acids. Anim Dis. 2023;3(1):23.
83.
Mann ER, Lam YK, Uhlig HH. Short-chain fatty acids: Linking diet, the microbiome and immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2024.
84.
Zhang D, Jian YP, Zhang YN, Li Y, Gu LT, Sun HH, Liu MD, Zhou HL, Wang YS, Xu ZX. Short-chain fatty acids in diseases. Cell Commun Signal. 2023;21(1):212.
85.
Lavado-García J, Roncero-Martin R, Moran JM, Pedrera-Canal M, Aliaga I, Leal-Hernandez O, Rico-Martin S, Canal-Macias ML. Long-chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid dietary intake is positively associated with bone mineral density in normal and osteopenic Spanish women. PLOS ONE. 2018;13(1): Article e0190539.
86.
Longo AB, Ward WE. PUFAs, bone mineral density, and fragility fracture: Findings from human studies. Adv Nutr. 2016;7(2):299–312.
87.
Sadeghi O, Djafarian K, Ghorabi S, Khodadost M, Nasiri M, Shab-Bidar S. Dietary intake of fish, n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and risk of hip fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis on observational studies. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2019;59(8):1320–1333.
88.
Fan CM, Su YW, Howe PR, Xian CJ. Long chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation protects against Adriamycin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy-induced bone marrow damage in female rats. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(2):484.
89.
Salari P, Rezaie A, Larijani B, Abdollahi M. A systematic review of the impact of n-3 fatty acids in bone health and osteoporosis. Med Sci Mon. 2008;14(3):Ra37–Ra44.
90.
Kelly OJ, Gilman JC, Kim Y, Ilich JZ. Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids may mutually benefit both obesity and osteoporosis. Nutr Res. 2013;33(7):521–533.
91.
Varela-López A, Ochoa JJ, Llamas-Elvira JM, López-Frías M, Planells E, Ramirez-Tortosa M, Ramirez-Tortosa CL, Giampieri F, Battino M, Quiles JL. Age-related loss in bone mineral density of rats fed lifelong on a fish oil-based diet is avoided by coenzyme Q(10) addition. Nutrients. 2017;9(2):176.
92.
Chen Y, Cao H, Sun D, Lin C, Wang L, Huang M, Jiang H, Zhang Z, Jin D, Zhang B, et al. Endogenous production of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids promotes fracture healing in mice. J Healthc Eng. 2017;2017: Article 3571267.
93.
Virtanen JK, Mozaffarian D, Willett WC, Feskanich D. Dietary intake of polyunsaturated fatty acids and risk of hip fracture in men and women. Osteoporosis Int. 2012;23(11):2615–2624.
94.
Navarini L, Afeltra A, Gallo Afflitto G, Margiotta DPE. Polyunsaturated fatty acids: Any role in rheumatoid arthritis? Lipids Health Dis. 2017;16(1):197.
95.
Woo SJ, Lim K, Park SY, Jung MY, Lim HS, Jeon MG, Lee SI, Park BH. Endogenous conversion of n-6 to n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids attenuates K/BxN serum-transfer arthritis in fat-1 mice. J Nutr Biochem. 2015;26(7):713–720.
96.
Grundy SM. Absorption and metabolism of dietary cholesterol. Annu Rev Nutr. 1983;3:71–96.
97.
Feingold KR. Lipid and lipoprotein metabolism. Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am. 2022;51(3):437–458.
98.
DeBose-Boyd RA. Feedback regulation of cholesterol synthesis: Sterol-accelerated ubiquitination and degradation of HMG CoA reductase. Cell Res. 2008;18(6):609–621.
99.
Chua NK, Coates HW, Brown AJ. Squalene monooxygenase: A journey to the heart of cholesterol synthesis. Prog Lipid Res. 2020;79: Article 101033.
100.
Zheng B, He Y, Yin S, Zhu X, Zhao Q, Yang H, Wang Z, Zhu R, Cheng L. Unresolved excess accumulation of myelin-derived cholesterol contributes to scar formation after spinal cord injury. Research. 2023;6:0135.
101.
Norman LL, Oetama RJ, Dembo M, Byfield F, Hammer DA, Levitan I, Aranda-Espinoza H. Modification of cellular cholesterol content affects traction force adhesion and cell spreading. Cellular Mol Bioeng. 2010;3(2):151–162.
102.
Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell. 2006;126(4):677–689.
103.
Li H, Guo H, Li H. Cholesterol loading affects osteoblastic differentiation in mouse mesenchymal stem cells. Steroids. 2013;78(4):426–433.
104.
Sohn J, Lin H, Fritch MR, Tuan RS. Influence of cholesterol/caveolin-1/caveolae homeostasis on membrane properties and substrate adhesion characteristics of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018;9(1):86.
105.
Baker N, Sohn J, Tuan RS. Promotion of human mesenchymal stem cell osteogenesis by PI3-kinase/Akt signaling, and the influence of caveolin-1/cholesterol homeostasis. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;6:238.
106.
Izadpanah R, Schächtele DJ, Pfnür AB, Lin D, Slakey DP, Kadowitz PJ, Alt EU. The impact of statins on biological characteristics of stem cells provides a novel explanation for their pleiotropic beneficial and adverse clinical effects. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2015;309(8):C522–C531.
107.
Dragoljevic D, Kraakman MJ, Nagareddy PR, Ngo D, Shihata W, Kammoun HL, Whillas A, Lee MKS, Al-Sharea A, Pernes G, et al. Defective cholesterol metabolism in haematopoietic stem cells promotes monocyte-driven atherosclerosis in rheumatoid arthritis. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(23):2158–2167.
108.
Huang X, Lv Y, He P, Wang Z, Xiong F, He L, Zheng X, Zhang D, Cao Q, Tang C. HDL impairs osteoclastogenesis and induces osteoclast apoptosis via upregulation of ABCG1 expression. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin. 2018;50(9):853–861.
109.
Fung KYY, Ho TWW, Xu Z, Neculai D, Beauchemin CAA, Lee WL, Fairn GD. Apolipoprotein A1 and high-density lipoprotein limit low-density lipoprotein transcytosis by binding SR-B1. J Lipid Res. 2024;65(4): Article 100530.
110.
You L, Sheng ZY, Tang CL, Chen L, Pan L, Chen JY. High cholesterol diet increases osteoporosis risk via inhibiting bone formation in rats. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2011;32(12):1498–1504.
111.
Lu K, Shi TS, Shen SY, Shi Y, Gao HL, Wu J, Lu X, Gao X, Ju HX, Wang W, et al. Defects in a liver-bone axis contribute to hepatic osteodystrophy disease progression. Cell Metab. 2022;34(3):441–457.e7.
112.
Byrne EFX, Sircar R, Miller PS, Hedger G, Luchetti G, Nachtergaele S, Tully MD, Mydock-McGrane L, Covey DF, Rambo RP, et al. Structural basis of Smoothened regulation by its extracellular domains. Nature. 2016;535(7613):517–522.
113.
Smith AE, Sigurbjörnsdóttir ES, Steingrímsson E, Sigurbjörnsdóttir S. Hedgehog signalling in bone and osteoarthritis: The role of smoothened and cholesterol. FEBS J. 2022;290(12):3059–3075.
114.
Day TF, Guo X, Garrett-Beal L, Yang Y. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in mesenchymal progenitors controls osteoblast and chondrocyte differentiation during vertebrate skeletogenesis. Dev Cell. 2005;8(5):739–750.
115.
Li K, Xiu C, Zhou Q, Ni L, Du J, Gong T, Li M, Saijilafu H, Yang JC. A dual role of cholesterol in osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(3):2058–2066.
116.
Zheng S, Lin J, Pang Z, Zhang H, Wang Y, Ma L, Zhang H, Zhang X, Chen M, Zhang X, et al. Aberrant cholesterol metabolism and Wnt/β-catenin signaling coalesce via Frizzled5 in supporting cancer growth. Adv Sci. 2022;9(28):e2200750.
117.
Shen G, Ren H, Shang Q, Zhao W, Zhang Z, Yu X, Tang K, Tang J, Yang Z, Liang D, et al. Foxf1 knockdown promotes BMSC osteogenesis in part by activating the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway and prevents ovariectomy-induced bone loss. EBioMedicine. 2020;52: Article 102626.
118.
Helderman RC, Whitney DG, Duta-Mare M, Akhmetshina A, Vujic N, Jayapalan S, Nyman JS, Misra BB, Rosen CJ, Czech MP, et al. Loss of function of lysosomal acid lipase (LAL) profoundly impacts osteoblastogenesis and increases fracture risk in humans. Bone. 2021;148: Article 115946.
119.
Parhami F, Jackson SM, Tintut Y, Le V, Balucan JP, Territo M, Demer LL. Atherogenic diet and minimally oxidized low density lipoprotein inhibit osteogenic and promote adipogenic differentiation of marrow stromal cells. J Bone Miner Res. 1999;14(12):2067–2078.
120.
Jiang C, Wang Y, Zhang M, Xu J. Cholesterol inhibits autophagy in RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation through activating the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. Mol Biol Rep. 2022;49(10):9217–9229.
121.
Sul OJ, Kim JE, Ke K, Suh JH, Choi HS. Atherogenic diet-induced bone loss is primarily due to increased osteoclastogenesis in mice. J Nutr Biochem. 2020;79: Article 108337.
122.
Robertson KM, Norgård M, Windahl SH, Hultenby K, Ohlsson C, Andersson G, Gustafsson JA. Cholesterol-sensing receptors, liver X receptor alpha and beta, have novel and distinct roles in osteoclast differentiation and activation. J Bone Miner Res. 2006;21(8):1276–1287.
123.
Chen H, Hua P, Huang D, Zhang Y, Zhou H, Xu J, Gu Q. Discovery of spiro[pyrrolidine-3,3'-oxindole] LXRβ agonists for the treatment of osteoporosis. J Med Chem. 2023;66(1):752–765.
124.
Robertson Remen KM, Lerner UH, Gustafsson J, Andersson G. Activation of the liver X receptor-β potently inhibits osteoclastogenesis from lipopolysaccharide-exposed bone marrow-derived macrophages. J Leukoc Biol. 2013;93(1):71–82.
125.
Zhu H, Tamura A, Zhang S, Terauchi M, Yoda T, Yui N. Mitigating RANKL-induced cholesterol overload in macrophages with β-cyclodextrin-threaded polyrotaxanes suppresses osteoclastogenesis. Biomater Sci. 2022;10(18):5230–5242.
126.
Wei W, Schwaid AG, Wang X, Wang X, Chen S, Chu Q, Saghatelian A, Wan Y. Ligand activation of ERRα by cholesterol mediates statin and bisphosphonate effects. Cell Metab. 2016;23(3):479–491.
127.
Yang D, Wan Y. Molecular determinants for the polarization of macrophage and osteoclast. Semin Immunopathol. 2019;41(5):551–563.
128.
Luegmayr E, Glantschnig H, Wesolowski GA, Gentile MA, Fisher JE, Rodan GA, Reszka AA. Osteoclast formation, survival and morphology are highly dependent on exogenous cholesterol/lipoproteins. Cell Death Differ. 2004;11(1 Suppl):S108–S118.
129.
Okayasu M, Nakayachi M, Hayashida C, Ito J, Kaneda T, Masuhara M, Suda N, Sato T, Hakeda Y. Low-density lipoprotein receptor deficiency causes impaired osteoclastogenesis and increased bone mass in mice because of defect in osteoclastic cell-cell fusion. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(23):19229–19241.
130.
Brodeur MR, Brissette L, Falstrault L, Moreau R. HDL3 reduces the association and modulates the metabolism of oxidized LDL by osteoblastic cells: A protection against cell death. J Cell Biochem. 2008;105(6):1374–1385.
131.
Tourkova IL, Dobrowolski SF, Secunda C, Zaidi M, Papadimitriou-Olivgeri I, Papachristou DJ, Blair HC. The high-density lipoprotein receptor Scarb1 is required for normal bone differentiation in vivo and in vitro. Lab Investig. 2019;99(12):1850–1860.
132.
Neitzel J. Fatty acid molecules: Fundamentals and role in signaling. Nat Educ. 2010;3:57.
133.
Zierfuss B, Buda A, Villoria-González A, Logist M, Fabjan J, Parzer P, Battin C, Vandersteene S, Dijkstra IME, Waidhofer-Söllner P, et al. Saturated very long-chain fatty acids regulate macrophage plasticity and invasiveness. J Neuroinflammation. 2022;19(1):305.
134.
Mäkinen PI, Lappalainen JP, Heinonen SE, Leppänen P, Lähteenvuo MT, Aarnio JV, Heikkilä J, Turunen MP, Ylä-Herttuala S. Silencing of either SR-A or CD36 reduces atherosclerosis in hyperlipidaemic mice and reveals reciprocal upregulation of these receptors. Cardiovasc Res. 2010;88(3):530–538.
135.
Kim J, Ha J, Jeong C, Lee J, Lim Y, Jo K, Kim MK, Kwon HS, Song KH, Baek KH. Bone mineral density and lipid profiles in older adults: A nationwide cross-sectional study. Osteoporosis Int. 2023;34(1):119–128.
136.
Cao L, Wu W, Deng X, Guo H, Pu F, Shao Z. Association between total cholesterol and total bone mineral density in US adults: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 2011-2018. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18(1):40.
137.
Xie R, Huang X, Liu Q, Liu M. Positive association between high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and bone mineral density in U.S. adults: The NHANES 2011-2018. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022;17(1):92.
138.
Xie R, Huang X, Zhang Y, Liu Q, Liu M. High low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels are associated with osteoporosis among adults 20-59 years of age. Int J Gen Med. 2022;15:2261–2270.
139.
Zhang Q, Zhou J, Wang Q, Lu C, Xu Y, Cao H, Xie X, Wu X, Li J, Chen D. Association between bone mineral density and lipid profile in Chinese women. Clin Interv Aging. 2020;15:1649–1664.
140.
Mangu SR, Patel K, Sukhdeo SV, Savitha MR, Sharan K. Maternal high-cholesterol diet negatively programs offspring bone development and downregulates hedgehog signaling in osteoblasts. J Biol Chem. 2022;298(9): Article 102324.
141.
Song Y, Liu J, Zhao K, Gao L, Zhao J. Cholesterol-induced toxicity: An integrated view of the role of cholesterol in multiple diseases. Cell Metab. 2021;33(10):1911–1925.
142.
Awan Z, Alwaili K, Alshahrani A, Langsetmo L, Goltzman D, Genest J. Calcium homeostasis and skeletal integrity in individuals with familial hypercholesterolemia and aortic calcification. Clin Chem. 2010;56(10):1599–1607.
143.
Cutillas-Marco E, Prosper AF, Grant WB, Morales-Suárez-Varela MM. Vitamin D status and hypercholesterolemia in Spanish general population. Dermatoendocrinol. 2013;5(3):358–362.
144.
Yerges-Armstrong LM, Shen H, Ryan KA, Streeten EA, Shuldiner AR, Mitchell BD. Decreased bone mineral density in subjects carrying familial defective apolipoprotein B-100. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(12):E1999–E2005.
145.
Chen PY, Sun JS, Tsuang YH, Chen MH, Weng PW, Lin FH. Simvastatin promotes osteoblast viability and differentiation via Ras/Smad/Erk/BMP-2 signaling pathway. Nutr Res. 2010;30(3):191–199.
146.
Oryan A, Kamali A, Moshiri A. Potential mechanisms and applications of statins on osteogenesis: Current modalities, conflicts and future directions. J Control Release. 2015;215:12–24.
147.
Chamani S, Liberale L, Mobasheri L, Montecucco F, Al-Rasadi K, Jamialahmadi T, Sahebkar A. The role of statins in the differentiation and function of bone cells. Eur J Clin Investig. 2021;51(7): Article e13534.
148.
Shao PL, Wu SC, Lin ZY, Ho ML, Chen CH, Wang CZ. Alpha-5 integrin mediates simvastatin-induced osteogenesis of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(3):306.
149.
Dai B, Li X, Xu J, Zhu Y, Huang L, Tong W, Yao H, Chow DH, Qin L. Synergistic effects of magnesium ions and simvastatin on attenuation of high-fat diet-induced bone loss. Bioact Mater. 2021;6(8):2511–2522.
150.
Sun T, Xing HL, Chen ZZ, Tao ZS, Li J. Simvastatin reverses the harmful effects of high fat diet on titanium rod osseointegration in ovariectomized rats. J Bone Miner Metab. 2021;39(6):944–951.
151.
Kim AR, Kim JH, Kim A, Sohn Y, Cha JH, Bak EJ, Yoo YJ. Simvastatin attenuates tibial bone loss in rats with type 1 diabetes and periodontitis. J Transl Med. 2018;16(1):306.
152.
Montazerolghaem M, Rasmusson A, Melhus H, Engqvist H, Karlsson Ott M. Simvastatin-doped pre-mixed calcium phosphate cement inhibits osteoclast differentiation and resorption. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2016;27(5):83.
153.
Cheon YH, Lee CH, Kim S, Park GD, Kwak SC, Cho HJ, Kim JY, Lee MS. Pitavastatin prevents ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis by regulating osteoclastic resorption and osteoblastic formation. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;139: Article 111697.
154.
Lee WS, Lee EG, Sung MS, Choi YJ, Yoo WH. Atorvastatin inhibits osteoclast differentiation by suppressing NF-κB and MAPK signaling during IL-1β-induced osteoclastogenesis. Korean J Intern Med. 2018;33(2):397–406.
155.
Xu R, Shi G, Xu L, Gu Q, Fu Y, Zhang P, Cheng J, Jiang H. Simvastatin improves oral implant osseointegration via enhanced autophagy and osteogenesis of BMSCs and inhibited osteoclast activity. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2018;12(5):1209–1219.
156.
Lin TK, Chou P, Lin CH, Hung YJ, Jong GP. Long-term effect of statins on the risk of new-onset osteoporosis: A nationwide population-based cohort study. PLOS ONE. 2018;13(5): Article e0196713.
157.
Li GH, Cheung CL, Au PC, Tan KC, Wong IC, Sham PC. Positive effects of low LDL-C and statins on bone mineral density: An integrated epidemiological observation analysis and Mendelian randomization study. Int J Epidemiol. 2020;49(4):1221–1235.
158.
An T, Hao J, Sun S, Li R, Yang M, Cheng G, Zou M. Efficacy of statins for osteoporosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporosis Int. 2017;28(1):47–57.
159.
Del Chiaro A, Marchetti S, Parchi PD, Caprili G, Ipponi E, Scaglione M. Use of statins and hip fracture risk: A case-control study. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cechoslov. 2022;89(2):104–107.
160.
Donzelli A, Battaggia A, Schivalocchi A. Statin use does not protect from fractures: The healthy adherer effect is a plausible explanation in observational studies. Osteoporosis Int. 2017;28(9):2739–2740.
161.
Oliviero F, Lo Nigro A, Bernardi D, Giunco S, Baldo G, Scanu A, Sfriso P, Ramonda R, Plebani M, Punzi L. A comparative study of serum and synovial fluid lipoprotein levels in patients with various arthritides. Clin Chim Acta. 2012;413(1-2):303–307.
162.
Gierman LM, Kühnast S, Koudijs A, Pieterman EJ, Kloppenburg M, van Osch GJ, Stojanovic-Susulic V, Huizinga TW, Princen HM, Zuurmond AM. Osteoarthritis development is induced by increased dietary cholesterol and can be inhibited by atorvastatin in APOE*3Leiden. CETP mice—A translational model for atherosclerosis, Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(5):921-927.
163.
Choi WS, Lee G, Song WH, Koh JT, Yang J, Kwak JS, Kim HE, Kim SK, Son YO, Nam H, et al. The CH25H-CYP7B1-RORα axis of cholesterol metabolism regulates osteoarthritis. Nature. 2019;566(7743):254–258.
164.
Haj-Mirzaian A, Mohajer B, Guermazi A, Conaghan PG, Lima JAC, Blaha MJ, Bingham CO, Roemer FW, Cao X, Demehri S. Statin use and knee osteoarthritis outcome measures according to the presence of Heberden nodes: Results from the osteoarthritis initiative. Radiology. 2019;293(2):396–404.
165.
van Gemert Y, Kozijn AE, Pouwer MG, Kruisbergen NNL, van den Bosch MHJ, Blom AB, Pieterman EJ, Weinans H, Stoop R, Princen HMG, et al. Novel high-intensive cholesterol-lowering therapies do not ameliorate knee OA development in humanized dyslipidemic mice. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2021;29(9):1314–1323.
166.
Zhang Y, Proenca R, Maffei M, Barone M, Leopold L, Friedman JM. Positional cloning of the mouse obese gene and its human homologue. Nature. 1994;372(6505):425–432.
167.
Harris RB. Direct and indirect effects of leptin on adipocyte metabolism. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1842(3):414–423.
168.
Ducy P, Amling M, Takeda S, Priemel M, Schilling AF, Beil FT, Shen J, Vinson C, Rueger JM, Karsenty G. Leptin inhibits bone formation through a hypothalamic relay: A central control of bone mass. Cell. 2000;100(2):197–207.
169.
Zou W, Rohatgi N, Brestoff JR, Zhang Y, Scheller EL, Craft CS, Brodt MD, Migotsky N, Silva MJ, Harris CA, et al. Congenital lipodystrophy induces severe osteosclerosis. PLOS Genet. 2019;15(6): Article e1008244.
170.
Takeda S, Elefteriou F, Levasseur R, Liu X, Zhao L, Parker KL, Armstrong D, Ducy P, Karsenty G. Leptin regulates bone formation via the sympathetic nervous system. Cell. 2002;111(3):305–317.
171.
Elefteriou F, Ahn JD, Takeda S, Starbuck M, Yang X, Liu X, Kondo H, Richards WG, Bannon TW, Noda M, et al. Leptin regulation of bone resorption by the sympathetic nervous system and CART. Nature. 2005;434(7032):514–520.
172.
Sun JS, Yang DJ, Kinyua AW, Yoon SG, Seong JK, Kim J, Moon SJ, Shin DM, Choi YH, Kim KW. Ventromedial hypothalamic primary cilia control energy and skeletal homeostasis. J Clin Invest. 2021;131(1):e138107.
173.
Zhou BO, Yue R, Murphy MM, Peyer JG, Morrison SJ. Leptin-receptor-expressing mesenchymal stromal cells represent the main source of bone formed by adult bone marrow. Cell Stem Cell. 2014;15(2):154–168.
174.
Yue R, Zhou BO, Shimada IS, Zhao Z, Morrison SJ. Leptin receptor promotes Adipogenesis and reduces osteogenesis by regulating mesenchymal stromal cells in adult bone marrow. Cell Stem Cell. 2016;18(6):782–796.
175.
Liu Z, Xiao T, Liu H. Leptin signaling and its central role in energy homeostasis. Front Neurosci. 2023;17:1238528.
176.
Dagon Y, Hur E, Zheng B, Wellenstein K, Cantley LC, Kahn BB. p70S6 kinase phosphorylates AMPK on serine 491 to mediate leptin's effect on food intake. Cell Metab. 2012;16(1):104–112.
177.
Claret M, Smith MA, Batterham RL, Selman C, Choudhury AI, Fryer LG, Clements M, Al-Qassab H, Heffron H, Xu AW, et al. AMPK is essential for energy homeostasis regulation and glucose sensing by POMC and AgRP neurons. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(8):2325–2336.
178.
Zhao X, Patil S, Xu F, Lin X, Qian A. Role of biomolecules in osteoclasts and their therapeutic potential for osteoporosis. Biomol Ther. 2021;11(5):747.
179.
Holloway WR, Collier FM, Aitken CJ, Myers DE, Hodge JM, Malakellis M, Gough TJ, Collier GR, Prof GC. Nicholson, leptin inhibits osteoclast generation. J Bone Miner Res. 2009;17(2):200–209.
180.
Hou X, Tian F. STAT3-mediated osteogenesis and osteoclastogenesis in osteoporosis. Cell Commun Signal. 2022;20(1):112.
181.
Volkan G, Abdulsamed K, Emin Ş, Hacı Ahmet D. Leptin and its role in oxidative stress and apoptosis: An overview. In: Venketeshwer R, Leticia R, editors. Role of obesity in human health and disease. Rijeka (Croatia): IntechOpen; 2021. p. 9.
182.
Jiang LS, Zhang ZM, Jiang SD, Chen WH, Dai LY. Differential bone metabolism between postmenopausal women with osteoarthritis and osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23(4):475–483.
183.
Meng XH, Tan LJ, Xiao HM, Tang BS, Deng HW. Examining the causal role of leptin in bone mineral density: A Mendelian randomization study. Bone. 2019;125:25–29.
184.
Lam QL, Liu S, Cao X, Lu L. Involvement of leptin signaling in the survival and maturation of bone marrow-derived dendritic cells. Eur J Immunol. 2006;36(12):3118–3130.
185.
Wang L, Shao YY, Ballock RT. Leptin synergizes with thyroid hormone signaling in promoting growth plate chondrocyte proliferation and terminal differentiation in vitro. Bone. 2011;48(5):1022–1027.
186.
Han YC, Ma B, Guo S, Yang M, Li LJ, Wang SJ, Tan J. Leptin regulates disc cartilage endplate degeneration and ossification through activation of the MAPK-ERK signalling pathway in vivo and in vitro. J Cell Mol Med. 2018;22(4):2098–2109.
187.
Shu L, Fu Y, Sun H. The association between common serum adipokines levels and postmenopausal osteoporosis: A meta-analysis. J Cell Mol Med. 2022;26(15):4333–4342.
188.
Głogowska-Szeląg J, Kos-Kudła B, Marek B, Nowak M, Siemińska L. Assessment of selected adipocytokines in obese women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Endokrynol Pol. 2019;70(6):478–483.
189.
Mao L, Wang L, Bennett S, Xu J, Zou J. Effects of follicle-stimulating hormone on fat metabolism and cognitive impairment in women during menopause. Front Physiol. 2022;13:1043237.
190.
Kim SM, Sultana F, Sims S, Gimenez-Roig J, Laurencin V, Pallapati A, Rojekar S, Frolinger T, Zhou W, Gumerova A, et al. FSH, bone, belly and brain. J Endocrinol. 2024;262(1):e230377.
191.
Zaidi M, Kim SM, Mathew M, Korkmaz F, Sultana F, Miyashita S, Gumerova AA, Frolinger T, Moldavski O, Barak O, et al. Bone circuitry and interorgan skeletal crosstalk. eLife. 2023;12:e83142.
192.
Zaidi M, Yuen T, Kim SM. Pituitary crosstalk with bone, adipose tissue and brain. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2023;19(12):708–721.
193.
Mohiti-Ardekani J, Soleymani-Salehabadi H, Owlia MB, Mohiti A. Relationships between serum adipocyte hormones (adiponectin, leptin, resistin), bone mineral density and bone metabolic markers in osteoporosis patients. J Bone Miner Metab. 2014;32(4):400–404.
194.
Bonnet N, Gadois C, McCloskey E, Lemineur G, Lespessailles E, Courteix D, Benhamou CL. Protective effect of beta blockers in postmenopausal women: Influence on fractures, bone density, micro and macroarchitecture. Bone. 2007;40(5):1209–1216.
195.
Schlienger RG, Kraenzlin ME, Jick SS, Meier CR. Use of beta-blockers and risk of fractures. JAMA. 2004;292(11):1326–1332.
196.
Rejnmark L, Vestergaard P, Mosekilde L. Treatment with beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors, and calcium-channel blockers is associated with a reduced fracture risk: A nationwide case-control study. J Hypertens. 2006;24(3):581–589.
197.
Yang S, Nguyen ND, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV. Association between beta-blockers and fracture risk: A Bayesian meta-analysis. Bone. 2012;51(5):969–974.
198.
Khosla S, Drake MT, Volkman TL, Thicke BS, Achenbach SJ, Atkinson EJ, Joyner MJ, Rosen CJ, Monroe DG, Farr JN. Sympathetic β1-adrenergic signaling contributes to regulation of human bone metabolism. J Clin Invest. 2018;128(11):4832–4842.
199.
Toulis KA, Hemming K, Stergianos S, Nirantharakumar K, Bilezikian JP. β-Adrenergic receptor antagonists and fracture risk: A meta-analysis of selectivity, gender, and site-specific effects. Osteoporosis Int. 2014;25(1):121–129.
200.
Ait Eldjoudi D, Cordero Barreal A, Gonzalez-Rodríguez M, Ruiz-Fernández C, Farrag Y, Farrag M, Lago F, Capuozzo M, Gonzalez-Gay MA, Mera Varela A, et al. Leptin in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: Player or bystander? Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(5):2859.
201.
Min S, Shi T, Han X, Chen D, Xu Z, Shi D, Teng H, Jiang Q. Serum levels of leptin, osteopontin, and sclerostin in patients with and without knee osteoarthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2021;40(1):287–294.
202.
Hui W, Litherland GJ, Elias MS, Kitson GI, Cawston TE, Rowan AD, Young DA. Leptin produced by joint white adipose tissue induces cartilage degradation via upregulation and activation of matrix metalloproteinases. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71(3):455–462.
203.
Lambova SN, Batsalova T, Moten D, Stoyanova S, Georgieva E, Belenska-Todorova L, Kolchakova D, Dzhambazov B. Serum leptin and resistin levels in knee osteoarthritis—Clinical and radiologic links: Towards precise definition of metabolic type knee osteoarthritis. Biomedicines. 2021;9(8):1019.
204.
Bokarewa M, Bokarew D, Hultgren O, Tarkowski A. Leptin consumption in the inflamed joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003;62(10):952–956.
205.
Otvos L Jr, Shao WH, Vanniasinghe AS, Amon MA, Holub MC, Kovalszky I, Wade JD, Doll M, Cohen PL, Manolios N, et al. Toward understanding the role of leptin and leptin receptor antagonism in preclinical models of rheumatoid arthritis. Peptides. 2011;32(8):1567–1574.
206.
McCabe IC, Fedorko A, Myers MG Jr, Leinninger G, Scheller E, McCabe LR. Novel leptin receptor signaling mutants identify location and sex-dependent modulation of bone density, adiposity, and growth. J Cell Biochem. 2019;120(3):4398–4408.
207.
Garbe A, Graef F, Appelt J, Schmidt-Bleek K, Jahn D, Lünnemann T, Tsitsilonis S, Seemann R. Leptin mediated pathways stabilize posttraumatic insulin and osteocalcin patterns after long bone fracture and concomitant traumatic brain injury and thus influence fracture healing in a combined murine trauma model. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(23):9144.
208.
Arita Y, Kihara S, Ouchi N, Takahashi M, Maeda K, Miyagawa J, Hotta K, Shimomura I, Nakamura T, Miyaoka K, et al. Paradoxical decrease of an adipose-specific protein, adiponectin, in obesity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999;257(1):79–83.
209.
Hotta K, Funahashi T, Arita Y, Takahashi M, Matsuda M, Okamoto Y, Iwahashi H, Kuriyama H, Ouchi N, Maeda K, et al. Plasma concentrations of a novel, adipose-specific protein, adiponectin, in type 2 diabetic patients. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20(6):1595–1599.
210.
Akingbemi BT. Adiponectin receptors in energy homeostasis and obesity pathogenesis. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2013;114:317–342.
211.
Hu E, Liang P, Spiegelman BM. AdipoQ is a novel adipose-specific gene dysregulated in obesity. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(18):10697–10703.
212.
Liu Y, Sweeney G. Adiponectin action in skeletal muscle, best practice & research. Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;28(1):33–41.
213.
Berner HS, Lyngstadaas SP, Spahr A, Monjo M, Thommesen L, Drevon CA, Syversen U, Reseland JE. Adiponectin and its receptors are expressed in bone-forming cells. Bone. 2004;35(4):842–849.
214.
Waki H, Yamauchi T, Kamon J, Kita S, Ito Y, Hada Y, Uchida S, Tsuchida A, Takekawa S, Kadowaki T. Generation of globular fragment of adiponectin by leukocyte elastase secreted by monocytic cell line THP-1. Endocrinology. 2005;146(2):790–796.
215.
Halberg N, Schraw TD, Wang ZV, Kim JY, Yi J, Hamilton MP, Luby-Phelps K, Scherer PE. Systemic fate of the adipocyte-derived factor adiponectin. Diabetes. 2009;58(9):1961–1970.
216.
Luo XH, Guo LJ, Yuan LQ, Xie H, Zhou HD, Wu XP, Liao EY. Adiponectin stimulates human osteoblasts proliferation and differentiation via the MAPK signaling pathway. Exp Cell Res. 2005;309(1):99–109.
217.
Su CM, Lee WL, Hsu CJ, Lu TT, Wang LH, Xu GH, Tang CH. Adiponectin induces oncostatin M expression in osteoblasts through the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;17(1):29.
218.
Lee HW, Kim SY, Kim AY, Lee EJ, Choi J-Y, Kim JB. Adiponectin stimulates osteoblast differentiation through induction of COX2 in mesenchymal progenitor cells. Stem Cells. 2009;27(9):2254–2262.
219.
Kim Y, Park CW. Mechanisms of adiponectin action: Implication of adiponectin receptor agonism in diabetic kidney disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(7):1782.
220.
Wu HH, Guo Y, Pu YF, Tang ZH. Adiponectin inhibits lipoplysaccharide-induced inflammation and promotes osteogenesis in hPDLCs. Biosci Rep. 2021;41(3):BSR20192668.
221.
Yang J, Park OJ, Kim J, Han S, Yang Y, Yun CH, Han SH. Adiponectin deficiency triggers bone loss by up-regulation of osteoclastogenesis and down-regulation of osteoblastogenesis. Front Endocrinol. 2019;10:815.
222.
Wu X, Huang L, Liu J. Effects of adiponectin on osteoclastogenesis from mouse bone marrow-derived monocytes. Exp Ther Med. 2019;17(2):1228–1233.
223.
Liu Z, Liu H, Li Y, Wang Y, Xing R, Mi F, Xiang C, Fu R. Adiponectin inhibits the differentiation and maturation of osteoclasts via the mTOR pathway in multiple myeloma. Int J Mol Med. 2020;45(4):1112–1120.
224.
Gong Y, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Wang L, Wan L, Zu Y, Li C, Wang X, Cui ZK. Paracrine effects of recombinant human adiponectin promote bone regeneration. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9: Article 762335.
225.
Yin G, Liu H, Li J, Liu Y, Liu X, Luo E. Adenoviral delivery of adiponectin ameliorates osteogenesis around implants in ovariectomized rats. J Gene Med. 2019;21(2-3): Article e3069.
226.
Liu H, Liu S, Ji H, Zhao Q, Liu Y, Hu P, Luo E. An adiponectin receptor agonist promote osteogenesis via regulating bone-fat balance. Cell Prolif. 2021;54(6): Article e13035.
227.
Madel MB, Fu H, Pierroz DD, Schiffrin M, Winkler C, Wilson A, Pochon C, Toffoli B, Taïeb M, Jouzeau JY, et al. Lack of adiponectin drives hyperosteoclastogenesis in lipoatrophic mice. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9: Article 627153.
228.
Yu W, Zhong L, Yao L, Wei Y, Gui T, Li Z, Kim H, Holdreith N, Jiang X, Tong W, et al. Bone marrow adipogenic lineage precursors promote osteoclastogenesis in bone remodeling and pathologic bone loss. J Clin Invest. 2021;131(2):e140214.
229.
Zeng Y, Liang H, Guo Y, Feng Y, Yao Q. Adiponectin regulates osteocytic MLO-Y4 cell apoptosis in a high-glucose environment through the AMPK/FoxO3a signaling pathway. J Cell Physiol. 2021;236(10):7088–7096.
230.
Tsuchida A, Yamauchi T, Takekawa S, Hada Y, Ito Y, Maki T, Kadowaki T. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)alpha activation increases adiponectin receptors and reduces obesity-related inflammation in adipose tissue: Comparison of activation of PPARalpha, PPARgamma, and their combination. Diabetes. 2005;54(12):3358–3370.
231.
Carina V, Della Bella E, Costa V, Bellavia D, Veronesi F, Cepollaro S, Fini M, Giavaresi G. Bone's response to mechanical loading in aging and osteoporosis: Molecular mechanisms. Calcif Tissue Int. 2020;107(4):301–318.
232.
Yan Y, Wang L, Ge L, Pathak JL. Osteocyte-mediated translation of mechanical stimuli to cellular signaling and its role in bone and non-bone-related clinical complications. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2020;18(1):67–80.
233.
Han Y, You X, Xing W, Zhang Z, Zou W. Paracrine and endocrine actions of bone-the functions of secretory proteins from osteoblasts, osteocytes, and osteoclasts. Bone Res. 2018;6:16.
234.
Ansari MGA, Hussain SD, Wani KA, Yakout SM, Al-Disi D, Alokail MS, Reginster JY, Al-Daghri NM. Influence of bone mineral density in circulating adipokines among postmenopausal Arab women. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2020;27(1):374–379.
235.
Tanna N, Patel K, Moore AE, Dulnoan D, Edwards S, Hampson G. The relationship between circulating adiponectin, leptin and vaspin with bone mineral density (BMD), arterial calcification and stiffness: A cross-sectional study in post-menopausal women. J Endocrinol Investig. 2017;40(12):1345–1353.
236.
Mpalaris V, Anagnostis P, Anastasilakis AD, Goulis DG, Doumas A, Iakovou I. Serum leptin, adiponectin and ghrelin concentrations in post-menopausal women: Is there an association with bone mineral density? Maturitas. 2016;88:32–36.
237.
Biver E, Salliot C, Combescure C, Gossec L, Hardouin P, Legroux-Gerot I, Cortet B. Influence of adipokines and ghrelin on bone mineral density and fracture risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(9):2703–2713.
238.
Szumilas K, Szumilas P, Słuczanowska-Głąbowska S, Zgutka K, Pawlik A. Role of adiponectin in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(21):8265.
239.
Tang Q, Hu ZC, Shen LY, Shang P, Xu HZ, Liu HX. Association of osteoarthritis and circulating adiponectin levels: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lipids Health Dis. 2018;17(1):189.
240.
Chen X, Lu J, Bao J, Guo J, Shi J, Wang Y. Adiponectin: A biomarker for rheumatoid arthritis? Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2013;24(1):83–89.
241.
Choi JY. Healthy bone tissue homeostasis. Exp Mol Med. 2020;52(8):1165.
242.
Kim JM, Lin C, Stavre Z, Greenblatt MB, Shim JH. Osteoblast-osteoclast communication and bone homeostasis. Cells. 2020;9(9):2073.
243.
Rendina-Ruedy E, Rosen CJ. Lipids in the bone marrow: An evolving perspective. Cell Metab. 2020;31(2):219–231.
244.
Riddle RC, Clemens TL. Bone cell bioenergetics and skeletal energy homeostasis. Physiol Rev. 2017;97(2):667–698.
245.
Niemeier A, Niedzielska D, Secer R, Schilling A, Merkel M, Enrich C, Rensen PCN, Heeren J. Uptake of postprandial lipoproteins into bone in vivo: Impact on osteoblast function. Bone. 2008;43(2):230–237.
246.
Kim SP, Frey JL, Li Z, Kushwaha P, Zoch ML, Tomlinson RE, Da H, Aja S, Noh HL, Kim JK, et al. Sclerostin influences body composition by regulating catabolic and anabolic metabolism in adipocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114(52):E11238–E11247.
247.
Jeon YK, Kim KM, Kim KJ, Kim IJ, Lim SK, Rhee Y. The anabolic effect of teriparatide is undermined by low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Calcif Tissue Int. 2014;94(2):159–168.
248.
Dragojevič J, Zupan J, Haring G, Herman S, Komadina R, Marc J. Triglyceride metabolism in bone tissue is associated with osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation: A gene expression study. J Bone Miner Metab. 2013;31(5):512–519.
249.
Ferron M, McKee MD, Levine RL, Ducy P, Karsenty G. Intermittent injections of osteocalcin improve glucose metabolism and prevent type 2 diabetes in mice. Bone. 2012;50(2):568–575.
250.
Yasutake Y, Mizokami A, Kawakubo-Yasukochi T, Chishaki S, Takahashi I, Takeuchi H, Hirata M. Long-term oral administration of osteocalcin induces insulin resistance in male mice fed a high-fat, high-sucrose diet. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2016;310(8):E662–E675.
251.
Otani T, Mizokami A, Hayashi Y, Gao J, Mori Y, Nakamura S, Takeuchi H, Hirata M. Signaling pathway for adiponectin expression in adipocytes by osteocalcin. Cell Signal. 2015;27(3):532–544.
252.
Otani T, Matsuda M, Mizokami A, Kitagawa N, Takeuchi H, Jimi E, Inai T, Hirata M. Osteocalcin triggers Fas/FasL-mediated necroptosis in adipocytes via activation of p300. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(12):1194.
253.
Li Q, Hua Y, Yang Y, He X, Zhu W, Wang J, Gan X. T cell factor 7 (TCF7)/TCF1 feedback controls osteocalcin signaling in brown adipocytes independent of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Mol Cell Biol. 2018;38(7):e00562-17.
254.
He Y, Su J, Gao H, Li J, Feng Z, Yin Y. GPRC6A mediates glucose and amino acid homeostasis in mice. Meta. 2022;12(8):740.
255.
Pi M, Kapoor K, Ye R, Nishimoto SK, Smith JC, Baudry J, Quarles LD. Evidence for osteocalcin binding and activation of GPRC6A in β-cells. Endocrinology. 2016;157(5):1866–1880.
256.
Pi M, Xu F, Ye R, Nishimoto SK, Williams RW, Lu L, Darryl Quarles L. Role of GPRC6A in regulating hepatic energy metabolism in mice. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):7216.
257.
Mukai S, Mizokami A, Otani T, Sano T, Matsuda M, Chishaki S, Gao J, Kawakubo-Yasukochi T, Tang R, Kanematsu T, et al. Adipocyte-specific GPRC6A ablation promotes diet-induced obesity by inhibiting lipolysis. J Biol Chem. 2021;296: Article 100274.
258.
Berger JM, Singh P, Khrimian L, Morgan DA, Chowdhury S, Arteaga-Solis E, Horvath TL, Domingos AI, Marsland AL, Yadav VK, et al. Mediation of the acute stress response by the skeleton. Cell Metab. 2019;30(5):890–902.e8.
259.
Zheng WB, Hu J, Zhao DC, Zhou BN, Wang O, Jiang Y, Xia WB, Xing XP, Li M. The role of osteocalcin in regulation of glycolipid metabolism and muscle function in children with osteogenesis imperfecta. Front Endocrinol. 2022;13: Article 898645.
260.
Bao Y, Ma X, Yang R, Wang F, Hao Y, Dou J, He H, Jia W. Inverse relationship between serum osteocalcin levels and visceral fat area in Chinese men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(1):345–351.
261.
Zeng H, Ge J, Xu W, Ma H, Chen L, Xia M, Pan B, Lin H, Wang S, Gao X. Type 2 diabetes is causally associated with reduced serum osteocalcin: A genomewide association and Mendelian randomization study. J Bone Miner Res. 2021;36(9):1694–1707.
262.
Yoshikawa Y, Kode A, Xu L, Mosialou I, Silva BC, Ferron M, Clemens TL, Economides AN, Kousteni S. Genetic evidence points to an osteocalcin-independent influence of osteoblasts on energy metabolism. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26(9):2012–2025.
263.
Rached MT, Kode A, Silva BC, Jung DY, Gray S, Ong H, Paik JH, DePinho RA, Kim JK, Karsenty G, et al. FoxO1 expression in osteoblasts regulates glucose homeostasis through regulation of osteocalcin in mice. J Clin Invest. 2010;120(1):357–368.
264.
Liu Z, Sun F, Liu Z, Wang X, Jin M, Mao J, Wu Q, Yan S, Xu K, Wang K, et al. Effect of sleeve gastrectomy on glycometabolism via forkhead box O1 (FoxO1)/lipocalin-2 (LCN2) pathway. Med Sci Monit. 2020;26: Article e927458.
265.
Greenhill C. Bone: Osteoblast-derived lipocalin 2 suppresses appetite. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2017;13(5):250.
266.
Cowland JB, Borregaard N. Molecular characterization and pattern of tissue expression of the gene for neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin from humans. Genomics. 1997;45(1):17–23.
267.
Mosialou I, Shikhel S, Liu JM, Maurizi A, Luo N, He Z, Huang Y, Zong H, Friedman RA, Barasch J, et al. MC4R-dependent suppression of appetite by bone-derived lipocalin 2. Nature. 2017;543(7645):385–390.
268.
Deis JA, Guo H, Wu Y, Liu C, Bernlohr DA, Chen X. Adipose Lipocalin 2 overexpression protects against age-related decline in thermogenic function of adipose tissue and metabolic deterioration. Mol Metab. 2019;24:18–29.
269.
Mosialou I, Shikhel S, Luo N, Petropoulou PI, Panitsas K, Bisikirska B, Rothman NJ, Tenta R, Cariou B, Wargny M, et al. Lipocalin-2 counteracts metabolic dysregulation in obesity and diabetes. J Exp Med. 2020;217(10):e20191261.
270.
Capulli M, Ponzetti M, Maurizi A, Gemini-Piperni S, Berger T, Mak TW, Teti A, Rucci N. A complex role for lipocalin 2 in bone metabolism: Global ablation in mice induces osteopenia caused by an altered energy metabolism. J Bone Miner Res. 2018;33(6):1141–1153.
271.
Meyers K, López M, Ho J, Wills S, Rayalam S, Taval S. Lipocalin-2 deficiency may predispose to the progression of spontaneous age-related adiposity in mice. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):14589.
272.
Petropoulou PI, Mosialou I, Shikhel S, Hao L, Panitsas K, Bisikirska B, Luo N, Bahna F, Kim J, Carberry P, et al. Lipocalin-2 is an anorexigenic signal in primates. eLife. 2020;9: Article e58949.
273.
Zhang Y, Guo H, Deis JA, Mashek MG, Zhao M, Ariyakumar D, Armien AG, Bernlohr DA, Mashek DG, Chen X. Lipocalin 2 regulates brown fat activation via a nonadrenergic activation mechanism. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(32):22063–22077.
274.
Deis JA, Guo H, Wu Y, Liu C, Bernlohr DA, Chen X. Lipocalin 2 regulates retinoic acid-induced activation of beige adipocytes. J Mol Endocrinol. 2018;61(3):115–126.
275.
Deis J, Lin TY, Bushman T, Chen X. Lipocalin 2 deficiency alters prostaglandin biosynthesis and mTOR signaling regulation of thermogenesis and lipid metabolism in adipocytes. Cells. 2022;11(9):1535.
276.
Olson B, Zhu X, Norgard MA, Levasseur PR, Butler JT, Buenafe A, Burfeind KG, Michaelis KA, Pelz KR, Mendez H, et al. Lipocalin 2 mediates appetite suppression during pancreatic cancer cachexia. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):2057.
277.
Daoud MS, Hussain SD, Al-Daghri NM. Cardiometabolic associations of circulating Lipocalin-2 in adults with varying degrees of adiposity and insulin resistance. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2022;717: Article 109138.
278.
van Bezooijen RL, Roelen BA, Visser A, van der Wee-Pals L, de Wilt E, Karperien M, Hamersma H, Papapoulos SE, ten Dijke P, Löwik CW. Sclerostin is an osteocyte-expressed negative regulator of bone formation, but not a classical BMP antagonist. J Exp Med. 2004;199(6):805–814.
279.
Kim SP, Da H, Wang L, Taketo MM, Wan M, Riddle RC. Bone-derived sclerostin and Wnt/β-catenin signaling regulate PDGFRα+ adipoprogenitor cell differentiation. FASEB J. 2021;35(11): Article e21957.
280.
Fairfield H, Falank C, Harris E, Demambro V, McDonald M, Pettitt JA, Mohanty ST, Croucher P, Kramer I, Kneissel M, et al. The skeletal cell-derived molecule sclerostin drives bone marrow adipogenesis. J Cell Physiol. 2018;233(2):1156–1167.
281.
Ukita M, Yamaguchi T, Ohata N, Tamura M. Sclerostin enhances adipocyte differentiation in 3T3-L1 cells. J Cell Biochem. 2016;117(6):1419–1428.
282.
Kim SP, Da H, Li Z, Kushwaha P, Beil C, Mei L, Xiong WC, Wolfgang MJ, Clemens TL, Riddle RC. Lrp4 expression by adipocytes and osteoblasts differentially impacts sclerostin's endocrine effects on body composition and glucose metabolism. J Biol Chem. 2019;294(17):6899–6911.
283.
Fulzele K, Lai F, Dedic C, Saini V, Uda Y, Shi C, Tuck P, Aronson JL, Liu X, Spatz JM, et al. Osteocyte-secreted Wnt signaling inhibitor sclerostin contributes to beige adipogenesis in peripheral fat depots. J Bone Miner Res. 2017;32(2):373–384.
284.
Kurgan N, Stoikos J, Baranowski BJ, Yumol J, Dhaliwal R, Sweezey-Munroe JB, Fajardo VA, Gittings W, MacPherson R, Klentrou P. Sclerostin influences exercise-induced adaptations in body composition and white adipose tissue morphology in male mice. J Bone Miner Res. 2023;38(4):541–555.
285.
Lima JG, Nobrega LHC, Lima NN, Dos Santos MCF, Baracho MFP, Winzenrieth R, Bandeira F, Mendes-Aguiar CO, Neto FPF, Ferreira LC, et al. Normal bone density and trabecular bone score, but high serum sclerostin in congenital generalized lipodystrophy. Bone. 2017;101:21–25.
286.
Ma YH, Schwartz AV, Sigurdsson S, Hue TF, Lang TF, Harris TB, Rosen CJ, Vittinghoff E, Eiriksdottir G, Hauksdottir AM, et al. Circulating sclerostin associated with vertebral bone marrow fat in older men but not women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(12):E2584–E2590.
287.
Sheng Z, Tong D, Ou Y, Zhang H, Zhang Z, Li S, Zhou J, Zhang J, Liao E. Serum sclerostin levels were positively correlated with fat mass and bone mineral density in central south Chinese postmenopausal women. Clin Endocrinol. 2012;76(6):797–801.
288.
Dimas A, Politi A, Bargiota A, Panoskaltsis T, Vlahos NF, Valsamakis G. The gestational effects of maternal bone marker molecules on fetal growth, metabolism and long-term metabolic health: A systematic review. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(15):8328.
289.
Costa AG, Cremers S, Bilezikian JP. Sclerostin measurement in human disease: Validity and current limitations. Bone. 2017;96:24–28.
290.
Kasonga AE, Deepak V, Kruger MC, Coetzee M. Arachidonic acid and docosahexaenoic acid suppress osteoclast formation and activity in human CD14+ monocytes, in vitro. PLOS ONE. 2015;10(4): Article e0125145.
291.
Cornish J, MacGibbon A, Lin JM, Watson M, Callon KE, Tong PC, Dunford JE, van der Does Y, Williams GA, Grey AB, et al. Modulation of osteoclastogenesis by fatty acids. Endocrinology. 2008;149(11):5688–5695.
292.
Yuan J, Akiyama M, Nakahama K, Sato T, Uematsu H, Morita I. The effects of polyunsaturated fatty acids and their metabolites on osteoclastogenesis in vitro. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2010;92(1-4):85–90.
293.
Boeyens JC, Deepak V, Chua WH, Kruger MC, Joubert AM, Coetzee M. Effects of ω3- and ω6-polyunsaturated fatty acids on RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation of RAW264.7 cells: A comparative in vitro study. Nutrients. 2014;6(7):2584–2601.
294.
Sun D, Krishnan A, Zaman K, Lawrence R, Bhattacharya A, Fernandes G. Dietary n-3 fatty acids decrease osteoclastogenesis and loss of bone mass in ovariectomized mice. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18(7):1206–1216.
295.
Bonnet N, Ferrari SL. Effects of long-term supplementation with omega-3 fatty acids on longitudinal changes in bone mass and microstructure in mice. J Nutr Biochem. 2011;22(7):665–672.
296.
Ahn SH, Park SY, Baek JE, Lee SY, Baek WY, Lee SY, Lee YS, Yoo HJ, Kim H, Lee SH, et al. Free fatty acid receptor 4 (GPR120) stimulates bone formation and suppresses bone resorption in the presence of elevated n-3 fatty acid levels. Endocrinology. 2016;157(7):2621–2635.
297.
Cugno C, Kizhakayil D, Calzone R, Rahman SM, Halade GV, Rahman MM. Omega-3 fatty acid-rich fish oil supplementation prevents rosiglitazone-induced osteopenia in aging C57BL/6 mice and in vitro studies. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):10364.
298.
Kim HJ, Ohk B, Yoon HJ, Kang WY, Seong SJ, Kim SY, Yoon YR. Docosahexaenoic acid signaling attenuates the proliferation and differentiation of bone marrow-derived osteoclast precursors and promotes apoptosis in mature osteoclasts. Cell Signal. 2017;29:226–232.
299.
Casado-Díaz A, Santiago-Mora R, Dorado G, Quesada-Gómez JM. The omega-6 arachidonic fatty acid, but not the omega-3 fatty acids, inhibits osteoblastogenesis and induces adipogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells: Potential implication in osteoporosis. Osteoporosis Int. 2013;24(5):1647–1661.
300.
Cardoso GB, Chacon E, Chacon PG, Bordeaux-Rego P, Duarte AS, Saad STO, Zavaglia CA, Cunha MR. Fatty acid is a potential agent for bone tissue induction: In vitro and in vivo approach. Exp Biol Med. 2017;242(18):1765–1771.
301.
Alsahli A, Kiefhaber K, Gold T, Muluke M, Jiang H, Cremers S, Schulze-Späte U. Palmitic acid reduces circulating bone formation markers in obese animals and impairs osteoblast activity via C16-ceramide accumulation. Calcif Tissue Int. 2016;98(5):511–519.
302.
Kwon JO, Jin WJ, Kim B, Kim HH, Lee ZH. Myristoleic acid inhibits osteoclast formation and bone resorption by suppressing the RANKL activation of Src and Pyk2. Eur J Pharmacol. 2015;768:189–198.
303.
Park EJ, Kim SA, Choi YM, Kwon HK, Shim W, Lee G, Choi S. Capric acid inhibits NO production and STAT3 activation during LPS-induced osteoclastogenesis. PLOS ONE. 2011;6(11): Article e27739.
Year 2024 volume 7 Issue 8
PDF
167
84
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.34133/research.0447
  • Receive Date:2024-04-19
  • Online Date:2025-07-24
  • Published:2024-08-20
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2024-04-19
  • Accepted:2024-07-17
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China (82002321, 82072425, 82272567, 82072498)
Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK2021650, BE2020666)
Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents (BX20230350)
Jiangsu Medical Research Project(ZD2022014)
Special Project of Diagnosis and Treatment Technology for Key Clinical Diseases in Suzhou(LCZX202003)
Program of Suzhou Health Commission(GSWS2022002)
National and Local Engineering Laboratory of New Functional Polymer Materials(SDGC2205)
Research Funds of Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM(2023IHM02007)
Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province(KYCX243339)
Affiliations
    1Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215006, China.
    2Department of Orthopedics, Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230022, China.
    3Department of Orthopedics, Jingjiang People's Hospital Affiliated to Yangzhou University, Jingjiang 214500, Jiangsu Province, China.

Corresponding:

* Address correspondence to: (D.G.); (J.B.)
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/research/EN/10.34133/research.0447
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT