收藏切换
Switchable Quantized Signal between Longitudinal Conductance and Hall Conductance in Dual Quantum Spin Hall Insulator TaIrTe4
收藏切换
PDF
Junwen Lai1, 2, Xiangyang Liu1, 2, Jie Zhan1, 2, Tianye Yu1, Peitao Liu1, 2, Xing-Qiu Chen1, 2, *, Yan Sun1, 2, *
Research. Vol 7 Article ID 0439
Less
收藏切换
Research. Vol 7 Article ID 0439
Research Article
Switchable Quantized Signal between Longitudinal Conductance and Hall Conductance in Dual Quantum Spin Hall Insulator TaIrTe4
Full
Junwen Lai1, 2, Xiangyang Liu1, 2, Jie Zhan1, 2, Tianye Yu1, Peitao Liu1, 2, Xing-Qiu Chen1, 2, *, Yan Sun1, 2, *
Affiliations
  • 1Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China.
  • 2School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Shenyang 110016, China.
Published: 2024-08-22 doi: 10.34133/research.0439
Outline
收藏切换

Topological insulating states in 2-dimensional (2D) materials are ideal systems to study different types of quantized response signals due to their in gap metallic states. Very recently, the quantum spin Hall effect was discovered in monolayer TaIrTe4 via the observation of quantized longitudinal conductance that rarely exists in other 2D topological insulators. The nontrivial Z2 topological charges can exist at both charge neutrality point and the van Hove singularity point with correlation-effect-induced bandgap. On the basis of this model 2D material, we studied the switch of quantized signals between longitudinal conductance and transversal Hall conductance via tuning external magnetic field. In Z2 topological phase of monolayer TaIrTe4, the zero Chern number can be understood as 1 – 1 = 0 from the double band inversion from spin-up and spin-down channels. After applying a magnetic field perpendicular to the plane, the Zeeman split changes the band order for one branch of the band inversion from spin-up and spin-down channels, along with a sign charge of the Berry phase. Then, the net Chern number of 1 – 1 = 0 is tuned to 1 + 1 = 2 or −1 – 1 = −2 depending on the orientation of the magnetic field. The quantized signal not only provides another effective method for the verification of topological state in monolayer TaIrTe4 but also offers a strategy for the utilization of the new quantum topological states based on switchable quantized responses.

Junwen Lai, Xiangyang Liu, Jie Zhan, Tianye Yu, Peitao Liu, Xing-Qiu Chen, Yan Sun. Switchable Quantized Signal between Longitudinal Conductance and Hall Conductance in Dual Quantum Spin Hall Insulator TaIrTe4[J]. Research, 2024 , 7 (8) : 0439 . DOI: 10.34133/research.0439
Topological states in 2-dimensional (2D) systems have been extensively studied in the past decades. The quantum Hall (QH) effect is the first discovered topological state in materials, which presents as quantized Hall conductance in the unit of e2/h with zero longitudinal conductance [14]. The quantized Hall conductance originated from the nondissipation chiral edge state, while all the other states are localized. In electronic band structures, the occupied and nonoccupied states are connected by the chiral edge states located in the bulk bandgap. The number of net edge channels can be understood from the Chern number of bulk band structures. Since the Hall conductance in the QH effect is only dependent on the fundamental constant of the electron charge and the Planck constant, it plays an important role in the metrology resistance standards and quantum computing [58].
In history, most of the QH effect states were measured in 2D electron gas under strong perpendicular magnetic fields [914]. With the generalization of topological band theory in condensed matter physics, it is found that different types of topological states exist in nature and applied magnetic fields can control different topological phase transitions, including both insulating and semimetal states. With this guiding principle, the QH effect and quantum anomalous Hall effect were realized in topological insulators and the thin film of Dirac semimetal, [1528] and the QH effect is even generalized into 3D electron systems [2933].
The interplay between the magnetic field and 2D topological materials provides an ideal platform for the study of topological phase transition among quantum spin Hall (QSH) insulators, topological semimetal, QH effect, and quantum anomalous Hall effect [3436]. In addition to plenty of quantum topological phases, the topological phase transition also offers an effective approach for detecting the topological states from quantized transport signals. Very recently, the theoretic proposed dual QSH insulator state of TaIrTe4 monolayer was confirmed by the experimentally fabrication [3739]. The nontrivial Z2 topological charges in TaIrTe4 exist at both the charge neutrality point and the van Hove singularity point with a new bandgap induced by strong correlations. Because of its 2D nature, monolayer TaIrTe4 can be understood as a model material for realizing different types of topological states under perturbations of strain, gating, magnetic field, and magnetic doping.
In this work, we studied the evolution of magnetic-field-induced topological phase transition from Z2 QSH insulator to QH insulator. Along with these phase transitions, the quantized signals of longitudinal conductance and Hall conductance are switched on and off via the control of an external magnetic field, as schematic shown in Fig. 1. The topological phase transition provides an effective approach to obtaining a QH effect state starting from the time-reversal symmetry 2D topological insulators, and the switchable quantized signals offer a strategy for the utilization of the new quantum topological material.
Bulk TaIrTe4 is a well-known type II Weyl semimetal that crystallized with an AB stacking of 2 centrosymmetric van der Waals layers [40,41]. Its monolayer was theoretically predicted as a QSH insulator at the charge neutrality point and very recently experimentally verified by the observation of quantized longitudinal conductance [3739]. In addition, nontrivial Z2 bandgaps of a correlated charge density wave (CDW) state were also observed by shifting Fermi level to the van Hove singularity points [3739] via weakly doping. The monolayer TaIrTe4 crystallized in a space group of P21/m (no. 11), which consists of 2 symmetry operators of inversion i and {C2y ∣ (0, 1/2, 0)}, as shown in Fig. 2.
On the basis of the experimental reported lattice structure [40], the electronic band structures evolution of the monolayer TaIrTe4 is calculated with a tuning external magnetic field. As presented in Fig. 3A, under the condition without external field, there is a band inversion at X point between the conduction and valence bands with a bandgap of ∼24 meV, which can be seen from the “W shape” of the dispersion near the bottom of conduction bands, in good agreement with previous reports [39,42]. The Z2 topological feature can be directly confirmed by the Wannier center evolution. From Fig. 3A, one can easily see that the evolution of Wannier centers in k1 − k2 plane presents as a zigzag form with changing partners at the time-reversal invariant point. Hence, the evolution lines cross the reference line an odd number of times in the half Brillouin zone (BZ).
The magnetic field serves as an effective way to tune the electronic band structure and band order as it breaks the time-reversal symmetry. We try to apply an external magnetic field perpendicular to the monolayer TaIrTe4 (see the sketch in Fig. 1A). As long as a nonzero magnetic field is introduced, the degeneracy between spin-up and spin-down is broken, and an obvious Zeeman split could be observed in both valence and conduction bands (see Fig. 3B). Correspondingly, the applied external magnetic field breaks the time-reversal symmetry of the Wannier center evolution, leading to an imbalance between the positive and negative parts along k1, as shown in Fig. 4A and B.
As the magnetic field increases, the spin-up and spin-down channels move in opposite directions within energy space, as shown in Fig. 3B to D. In this mechanism, the original band order between orbital1-spin-down and orbital2-spin-up channels remains unchanged, with only an increase in the magnitude of the inverted bandgap. On the contrary, the spin-up channel from orbital1 moves down, while the spin-down channel from orbital2 moves up, which results in a new band inversion between orbital1-spin-up and orbital2-spin-down states, as illustrated in the schematic diagram of Fig. 3E.
From the band-number-indexed Berry phase calculations, we found that the original band inversion due to the crystal field and spin-orbital coupling, i.e., the band inversion between orbital1-spin-down and orbital2-spin-up, hosts a Chern number 1. Similarly, the initial band inversion between orbital1-spin-up and orbital2-spin-down hosts a Chern number −1. Hence, the net Chern number maintains 0 under a weak field. However, as the magnetic field gradually increases, the newly generated band inversion between orbital1-spin-up and orbital2-spin-down has flipped its Chern number from −1 to 1. Consequently, the new phase with magnetic field above 0.1 μB hosts a net Chern number 2 and a nonzero quantized Hall conductance of 2e2/h.
The evolution of bandgaps between different orbital and spin characters, i.e., ΔE1 = Eor1 − down − Eor2 − up and ΔE2 = Eor1 − upEor2 − down, is given in Fig. 3F. We can see that the positive bandgap of ΔE2 decreases to zero at around gBz = 0.08 μB and then goes to the negative zone. Correspondingly, the Chern number between orbital1-spin-up and orbital2-spin-down changes from −1 to 1. On the other hand, the bandgap of ΔE1 follows an opposite trend as it keeps staying at the positive zone with a constant Chern number 1 within a magnetic field of 0.12 μB. Therefore, the topological phase transition is mainly induced by the band order exchange between orbital1-spin-up and orbital2-spin-down. The sign change of Chern number from −1 to 1 for the bandgap of ΔE2 leads to a net Chern number 2 for the whole system.
The QH insulating state was also confirmed by the Wannier center evolution in the 2D BZ under a magnetic field of gBz = 0.12 μB. As presented in Fig. 4C, the evolution of the Wannier center in the whole range of k1 axis is calculated because of the time-reversal symmetry breaking. When fixing the band number n as the fully occupied states, the Wannier center evolution lines cross the reference line twice, where both 2 evolution lines show a positive slope. From the energy dispersion in Fig. 3D, a global bandgap around 14 meV is observe, and, thus, a quantized Hall conductance is expected. We then calculated the chemical-potential-dependent Hall conductance by following the linear response Kubo formula (see Methods for details). From Fig. 4D, we can see a stable plateau of 2e2/h near the charge neutrality point at the situation of gBz = 0.12 μB, fully in agreement with the band-number-indexed Berry phase analysis and Wilson loop calculations. On the basis of the above analysis, we tried to rotate the magnetic field to the −z direction and found that both the slope of Wannier center evolution and Hall conductance change the signs.
For both QSH insulators and QH insulators, the quantized signals originate from the edge states located inside the bulk bandgaps. Figure 5A is the projected edge states for the QSH insulator phase along Y¯Γ¯Y¯, with spin helical linear crossing edge Dirac point locating at Γ¯. As long as a z-oriented magnetic field is applied, the Dirac point is broken by opening an anticrossing-like bandgap, due to time-reversal symmetry breaking (see Fig. 5B). After the new band inversion happens between orbital1-spin-up and orbital2-spin-down at X point, the spin helical edge states transfer to chiral edge states with positive velocity connecting the occupied and nonoccupied bulk bands (see Fig. 5C and D). Although the specific shapes of the edge states are dependent on the details of edge potentials, the net crossing points between the chiral edge states and Fermi levels are both 2 for the open boundary condition along x and y directions, fully in consistent with the bulk topological charge analysis. Therefore, the quantized signals are switchable between longitudinal conductance and transversal Hall conductance, via tuning the external magnetic field.
In addition to the QSH insulator phase of the primitive cell of the monolayer TaIrTe4 at the charge neutrality point, an unconventional CDW phase with 2 nontrivial gaps was also observed by weakly gating [37]. With the inspiration from this experimental result, we also analyzed the electronic structure of this CDW phase under a magnetic field, as shown in Fig. 6. After tuning the superlattice potential to V = 0.13 eV, 2 nontrivial gaps appear within a chemical potential of 0.1 eV, as shown in Fig. 6A, in consistent with the previously report [37]. After applying a nonzero magnetic field to the CDW phase, the degeneracy between 2 spin channels is broken, and a Zeeman split is induced, as presented in Fig. 6B to D. As the magnetic field increases, all the valence and conduction bands of these 3 bandgaps gradually get touched. However, all these 3 bandgaps disappear after band crossings, and the CDW phase of TaIrTe4 undergos a insulator–metal phase transition within this energy window, different from the phase transition in the primitive cell of monolayer TaIrTe4.
In summary, we studied the magnetic-field-induced topological phase transition in the newly discovered dual QSH insulator TaIrTe4. After applying a magnetic field along z direction, the original band order of the inverted bandgap from one branch of the spin-up and spin-down channels is exchanged, with the corresponding Chern number transferring from −1 to 1. Together with another original branch of band inversion with Chern number 1, the topological phase transition happens between the QSH insulator and the QH insulator. Since the QSH insulator state in monolayer TaIrTe4 can host a nonzero quantized longitudinal conductance that rarely exists in other 2D Z2 topological insulators, such topological phase transition is along with the exchange of quantized signals between longitudinal conductance and transversal Hall conductance. This result also proposes another effective strategy to verify the existence of QSH insulating state in TaIrTe4.
Ground-state study of monolayer TaIrTe4 and the Wannier projection is carried out in full-potential local-orbital package under generalized gradient approximation with Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof parametrization [4345]. Self-consistent energy reaches a convergence of 10−6 eV. Structure from the experimental is applied with lattice constants of a = 12.42 Å and b = 3.77 Å, and a vacuum of 15 Å is applied on c axis to eliminate the interlayer interaction. The CDW phase is simulated by a superlattice modulation of Fröhlich–Peierls Hamiltonian of H=Hr+VcosQxurur, where V is the CDW modulation strength, Q is the magnitude of the CDW vector, and x is the Wannier center coordinate along x axis [37,46]. Magnetic field is simulated by adding Zeeman splitting Hamiltonian on Wannier basis H0 that reads H = H0 + HZ, where HZ = gB · σ. For out-of-plane magnetic field Bz, it could be written as a scalar HZ = gBzσz. In comparison to the spin moment, the effect from orbital moments is relatively small and can be negligible. On the basis of H, edge-state calculation is performed by the iteration of green function [47], while the Wannier center evolution is carried out by the Wilson loop method [48]. Anomalous Hall conductivity with varying chemical potential is performed by the Kubo formula [49] in clean limit
σxyE=e2SdkifiEkΩxyikΩxyik=jImrxijkryjik
where raijk=iuikkaujk, ui(k) represents the ith Wannier state, S is the in-plane area of monolayer TaIrTe4, and Hij(k) is the Hamiltonian of the system, while fi(E,  k) is the occupation of band index i with momenta k under a chemical potential E. For the numerical integration over BZ, a k-point sampling of 6 × 18 × 1 is applied for the ground-state density functional theory study, while a sampling of 2,000 × 2,000 × 1 is used for the anomalous Hall conductivity calculation.
  • Key Technologies Research and Development Program (2021YFB3501503)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (52271016)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (52188101)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province (XLYC2203080)
1.
Laughlin RB. Quantized Hall conductivity in two dimensions. Phys Rev B. 1981;23(10):5632–5633.
2.
Tsui DC, Stormer HL, Gossard AC. Two-dimensional magnetotransport in the extreme quantum limit. Phys Rev Lett. 1982;48(22):1559–1562.
3.
Thouless DJ, Kohmoto M, Nightingale MP, den Nijs M. Quantized Hall conductance in a two-dimensional periodic potential. Phys Rev Lett. 1982;49(6):405–408.
4.
Tsukazaki A, Ohtomo A, Kita T, Ohno Y, Ohno H, Kawasaki M. Quantum Hall effect in polar oxide heterostructures. Science. 2007;315(5817):1388–1391.
5.
Hasan MZ, Kane CL. Colloquium: Topological insulators. Rev Mod Phys. 2010;82(4):3045–3067.
6.
Xiao D, Chang MC, Niu Q. Berry phase effects on electronic properties. Rev Mod Phys. 2010;82(3):1959–2007.
7.
Qi XL, Zhang SC. Topological insulators and superconductors. Rev Mod Phys. 2011;83(4):1057–1110.
8.
Sinova J, Valenzuela SO, Wunderlich J, Back CH, Jungwirth T. Spin Hall effects. Rev Mod Phys. 2015;87(4):1213–1260.
9.
Cooper JR, Kang W, Auban P, Montambaux G, J´erome D, Bechgaard K. Quantized Hall effect and a new field-induced phase transition in the organic superconductor (TMTSF)2PF6. Phys Rev Lett. 1989;63(18):1984–1987.
10.
Chu HT, Henriksen PN, Jing J, Wang H, Xu X. Magnetic-field dependence of Hall resistance in thin films of pure bismuth. Phys Rev B. 1992;45(19):11233–11237.
11.
Jiang HW, Johnson CE, Wang KL, Hannahs ST. Observation of magnetic-field-induced delocalization: Transition from Anderson insulator to quantum Hall conductor. Phys Rev Lett. 1993;71(9):1439–1442.
12.
Liu CX, Qi XL, Dai X, Fang Z, Zhang SC. Quantum anomalous Hall effect in Hg1−yMnyTe quantum wells. Phys Rev Lett. 2008;101(14): Article 146802.
13.
Maciejko J, Hughes TL, Zhang SC. The quantum spin Hall effect. Annu Rev Condens Matter Phys. 2011;2(1):31–53.
14.
Feng Y, Feng X, Ou Y, Wang J, Liu C, Zhang L, Zhao D, Jiang G, Zhang SC, He K, et al. Observation of the zero Hall plateau in a quantum anomalous Hall insulator. Phys Rev Lett. 2015;115(12): Article 126801.
15.
Yu R, Zhang W, Zhang HJ, Zhang SC, Dai X, Fang Z. Quantized anomalous Hall effect in magnetic topological insulators. Science. 2010;329(5987):61–64.
16.
Apalkov VM, Chakraborty T. Interacting Dirac fermions on a topological insulator in a magnetic field. Phys Rev Lett. 2011;107(18): Article 186801.
17.
Zyuzin AA, Hook MD, Burkov AA. Parallel magnetic field driven quantum phase transition in a thin topological insulator film. Phys Rev B. 2011;83(24): Article 245428.
18.
Beugeling W, Liu CX, Novik EG, Molenkamp LW, Morais SC. Reentrant topological phases in Mn-doped HgTe quantum wells. Phys Rev B. 2012;85(19): Article 195304.
19.
Liu X, Hsu HC, Liu CX. In-plane magnetization-induced quantum anomalous Hall effect. Phys Rev Lett. 2013;111(8): Article 086802.
20.
Zhang J, Chang CZ, Tang P, Zhang Z, Feng X, Li K, Wang LL, Chen X, Liu C, Duan W, et al. Topology-driven magnetic quantum phase transition in topological insulators. Science. 2013;339(6127):1582–1586.
21.
Bahari M, Hosseini MV. Zeeman-field-induced nontrivial topological phases in a one-dimensional spin-orbit-coupled dimerized lattice. Phys Rev B. 2016;94(12): Article 125119.
22.
Chang CZ, Zhao W, Li J, Jain JK, Liu C, Moodera JS, Chan MHW. Observation of the quantum anomalous Hall insulator to Anderson insulator quantum phase transition and its scaling behavior. Phys Rev Lett. 2016;117(12): Article 126802.
23.
Uchida M, Nakazawa Y, Nishihaya S, Akiba K, Kriener M, Kozuka Y, Miyake A, Taguchi Y, Tokunaga M, Nagaosa N, et al. Quantum Hall states observed in thin films of Dirac semimetal Cd3As2. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):2274.
24.
Asaba T, Wang Y, Li G, Xiang Z, Tinsman C, Chen L, Zhou S, Zhao S, Laleyan D, Li Y, et al. Magnetic field enhanced superconductivity in epitaxial thin film WTe2. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):6520.
25.
Zhang J, Liu Z, Wang J. In-plane magnetic-field-induced quantum anomalous Hall plateau transition. Phys Rev B. 2019;100(16): Article 165117.
26.
Satake Y, Shiogai J, Mazur GP, Kimura S, Awaji S, Fujiwara K, Nojima T, Nomura K, Souma S, Sato T, et al. Magnetic-field-induced topological phase transition in Fe-doped (Bi,Sb)2Se3 heterostructures. Phys Rev Mater. 2020;4(4): Article 044202.
27.
Kubisa M, Ryczko K. Topological phase transitions and a spin-related metallic state in inverted HgTe quantum Wells under in-plane magnetic field. Phys Rev B. 2021;104(16):L161406.
28.
Guo B, Miao W, Huang V, Lygo AC, Dai X, Stemmer S. Zeeman field-induced two-dimensional Weyl semimetal phase in cadmium arsenide. Phys Rev Lett. 2023;131(4): Article 046601.
29.
Tang F, Ren Y, Wang P, Zhong R, Schneeloch J, Yang SA, Yang K, Lee PA, Gu G, Qiao Z, et al. Three-dimensional quantum Hall effect and metal–insulator transition in ZrTe5. Nature. 2019;569:537–541.
30.
Galeski S, Zhao X, Wawrzyńczak R, Meng T, Förster T, Lozano PM, Honnali S, Lamba N, Ehmcke T, Markou A, et al. Unconventional Hall response in the quantum limit of HfTe5. Nat Commun. 2020;11:5926.
31.
Li H, Liu H, Jiang H, Xie XC. 3D quantum Hall effect and a global picture of edge states in Weyl semimetals. Phys Rev Lett. 2020;125(3): Article 036602.
32.
Li S, Wang CM, Du ZZ, Qin F, Lu HZ, Xie XC. 3D quantum Hall effects and nonlinear Hall effect. npj Quantum Mater. 2021;6(1):96.
33.
Liu JY, Yu J, Ning JL, Yi HM, Miao L, Min LJ, Zhao YF, Ning W, Lopez KA, Zhu YL, et al. Spin-valley locking and bulk quantum Hall effect in a noncentrosymmetric Dirac semimetal BaMnSb2. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):4062.
34.
Kawamura M, Mogi M, Yoshimi R, Tsukazaki A, Kozuka Y, Takahashi KS, Kawasaki M, Tokura Y. Topological quantum phase transition in magnetic topological insulator upon magnetization rotation. Phys Rev B. 2018;98(14): Article 140404.
35.
Zhan F, Ning Z, Gan LY, Zheng B, Fan J, Wang R. Floquet valley-polarized quantum anomalous Hall state in nonmagnetic heterobilayers. Phys Rev B. 2022;105(8):L081115.
36.
Kong X, Luo W, Li L, Yoon M, Berlijn T, Liang L. Floquet band engineering and topological phase transitions in 1T′ transition metal dichalcogenides. 2D Mater. 2022;9(2): Article 025005.
37.
Tang J, Ding TS, Chen H, Gao A, Qian T, Huang Z, Sun Z, Han X, Strasser A, Li J, et al. Dual quantum spin Hall insulator by density-tuned correlations in TaIrTe4. Nature. 2024;628(8008):515–521.
38.
Liu J, Wang H, Fang C, Fu L, Qian X. Van Der Waals stacking-induced topological phase transition in layered ternary transition metal chalcogenides. Nano Lett. 2017;17(1):467–475.
39.
Guo PJ, Lu XQ, Ji W, Liu K, Lu ZY. Quantum spin Hall effect in monolayer and bilayer TaIrTe4. Phys Rev B. 2020;102(4): Article 041109.
40.
Mar A, Jobic S, Ibers JA. Metal-metal vs tellurium-tellurium bonding in WTe2 and its ternary variants TaIrTe4 and NbIrTe4. J Am Chem Soc. 1992;114(23):8963–8971.
41.
Kumar D, Hsu CH, Sharma R, Chang TR, Yu P, Wang J, Eda G, Liang G, Yang H. Room-temperature nonlinear Hall effect and wireless radiofrequency rectification in Weyl semimetal TaIrTe4. Nat Nanotechnol. 2021;16(4):421–425.
42.
Zhao L, Yu G, Huang X, Chen W. TaIrTe4 monolayer with topological insulator characteristic: A new and highly efficient electrocatalyst toward oxygen reduction reaction. J Phys Chem C. 2022;126(46):19685–19692.
43.
Opahle I, Koepernik K, Eschrig H. Full-potential band-structure calculation of iron pyrite. Phys Rev B. 1999;60(20):14035–14041.
44.
Koepernik K, Eschrig H. Full-potential nonorthogonal local-orbital minimum-basis band-structure scheme. Phys Rev B. 1999;59(3):1743–1757.
45.
Koepernik K, Janson O, Sun Y, van den Brink J. Symmetry-conserving maximally projected Wannier functions. Phys Rev B. 2023;107(23): Article 235135.
46.
Frohlich H. On the theory of superconductivity: The one-dimensional case. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci. 1954;223(1154):296–305.
47.
Lopez Sancho MP, Lopez Sancho JM, Rubio J. Quick iterative scheme for the calculation of transfer matrices: Application to Mo (100). J Phys F Met Phys. 1984;14(15):1205.
48.
Yu R, Qi XL, Bernevig A, Fang Z, Dai X. Equivalent expression of Z2 topological invariant for band insulators using the non-Abelian Berry connection. Phys Rev B. 2011;84(7): Article 075119.
49.
Nagaosa N, Sinova J, Onoda S, MacDonald AH, Ong NP. Anomalous Hall effect. Rev Mod Phys. 2010;82(2):1539–1592.
Year 2024 volume 7 Issue 8
PDF
183
106
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.34133/research.0439
  • Receive Date:2024-05-04
  • Online Date:2025-07-24
  • Published:2024-08-22
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2024-05-04
  • Accepted:2024-07-09
Funding
Key Technologies Research and Development Program (2021YFB3501503)
National Natural Science Foundation of China (52271016)
National Natural Science Foundation of China (52188101)
Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province (XLYC2203080)
Affiliations
    1Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China.
    2School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Shenyang 110016, China.

Corresponding:

* Address correspondence to: (X.-Q.C.); (Y.S.)
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/research/EN/10.34133/research.0439
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT