Nanomaterials can only exert their effects after penetrating the mucus layer and reaching the colonization site of
H. pylori. Generally, compounds with weak negative charges or near-neutral charges and hydrophilicity interact minimally with mucus and thus readily permeate the mucus layer [
33–
37]. When FU wrapped Cu-MOF@N nanoparticles through hydrophobic interactions (van der Waals forces), the Zeta potential value of nanoparticles in SGF became the desired weak negative charge and showed no significant difference compared to the Zeta potential value in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (Fig. S7), which reduced the interaction of Cu-MOF@NF with the mucus layer, allowing for penetrating the mucus layer more easily. We further utilized an ICP-AES instrument to measure the release curves of Cu
2+ at different pH values. The results indicated that Cu
2+ was released under different pH conditions (Fig. S8). Therefore, the FU coating designed here not only improved the stability of Cu-MOF@NF, but also increased its permeability and ability to inhibit bacterial adhesion. Furthermore, the transwell device was used to study the mucus permeability of Cu-MOF@NF, and the results were quantified by measuring the fluorescence intensity of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled material permeating simulated gastric mucus in the lower chamber (Fig.
3A). As presented in Fig.
3B, stronger fluorescence and significant differences were detected in FU and Cu-MOF@NF groups relative to other groups. Similarly, the SGF was placed on the hardened agarose gel, and then the samples were stained with Coomassie brilliant blue and deposited on the surface of the SGF. Over time, it could be observed that FU and Cu-MOF@NF penetrated the agarose gel more rapidly than the other groups (Fig. S9). The amount of Cu
2+ in the bottom layer of the agarose gel was subsequently analyzed by ICP-AES to quantify the mucus permeability. We observed that the Cu-MOF@NF group had the highest level of Cu
2+ (Fig.
3C), which indicated that the FU-coated nanoparticles had better mucus permeability than the bare nanoparticles. Afterwards, to investigate the penetration of Cu-MOF@NF in vivo, the stomachs of mice were taken for immunofluorescence examination after 2 h of gavage with FITC-labeled Cu-MOF@NF (FITC-Cu-MOF@NF), and mucus layers of the stomachs were co-localized with MUC5AC mucosal glycoprotein-specific antibodies [
38]. Under confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), it could be recognized that the Cu-MOF@NF group had a large amount of FITC-Cu-MOF@NF in the lower gastric mucus layer where the MUC5AC antibody was expressed in comparison to the FITC gavage (control) group (Fig.
3D). This suggested the good ability of Cu-MOF@NF to penetrate the gastric mucus of mice, which provided good feasibility for in vivo treatment in mice. Then, the antibacterial properties of Cu-MOF@NF were firstly assessed in vitro. From Fig. S10, the antibacterial effects of Cu-MOF@NF against
H. pylori strain ATCC 43504 and rodent-adapted CagA
+ H. pylori strain pre-murine Sydney Strain 1 (PMSS1) were concentration-dependent. There was no statistical difference in antimicrobial effect between 180 μg ml
−1 and 200 μg ml
−1 concentrations, and thus the optimal bacteriostatic concentration was 180 μg ml
−1. To validate the suppressive role of Cu-MOF@NF against adhesion of
H. pylori, it was investigated by locating
H. pylori with its antibodies through immunofluorescence assay, which studied the adhesion of
H. pylori on the gastric mucosa cell line (HFE145) and human gastric epithelium (GES-1) cells after treating with 25 μg ml
−1 Cu-MOF@NF. It has been demonstrated that Cu-MOF@NF has almost no antimicrobial effect at a density of 25 μg ml
−1, which therefore excludes the total number of bacteria becoming less due to the antimicrobial effect of the material itself (Fig. S11). It was observed that there was good cell growth and no bacterial adhesion in the blank group, whereas there was aggregation of
H. pylori (red) surrounding the cells (blue) in the control group, implying that the bacteria were widely adhering to the cell surface. Notably,
H. pylori adhesion was hardly observed in the FU and Cu-MOF@NF groups (Fig.
3E and Fig. S12A). Further quantification of fluorescence intensity showed a significant reduction in
H. pylori adhesion when treated with FU and Cu-MOF@NF (Fig.
3F and Fig. S12B). Namely, as the sulfate polysaccharide containing the rock-algae glycosyl group, FU prevents cell adhesion of
H. pylori by decreasing its interaction with epithelial cells. The probable mechanism involved the competitive binding of FU to BabA of
H. pylori [
39,
40].