收藏切换
Nanozyme-Based Strategies against Bone Infection
收藏切换
PDF
Zhenyu Li, Guoqiang Jia, Zheng Su*, Chen Zhu*
Research. Vol 8 Article ID 0605
Less
收藏切换
Research. Vol 8 Article ID 0605
Perspective
Nanozyme-Based Strategies against Bone Infection
Full
Zhenyu Li, Guoqiang Jia, Zheng Su*, Chen Zhu*
Affiliations
  • Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230001, China.
Published: 2025-02-11 doi: 10.34133/research.0605
Outline
收藏切换

Nanozymes are a class of nanomaterials that exhibit catalytic functions analogous to those of natural enzymes. They demonstrate considerable promise in the biomedical field, particularly in the treatment of bone infections, due to their distinctive physicochemical properties and adjustable catalytic activities. Bone infections (e.g., periprosthetic infections and osteomyelitis) are infections that are challenging to treat clinically. Traditional treatments often encounter issues related to drug resistance and suboptimal anti-infection outcomes. The advent of nanozymes has brought with it a new avenue of hope for the treatment of bone infections.

Zhenyu Li, Guoqiang Jia, Zheng Su, Chen Zhu. Nanozyme-Based Strategies against Bone Infection[J]. Research, 2025 , 8 (2) : 0605 . DOI: 10.34133/research.0605
Bone infections, or osteomyelitis, remain a marked challenge to treat due to the protective biofilms formed by pathogens and their resistance to conventional antibiotics [1,2]. Bone infection fundamentally disrupts tissue homeostasis through pathological elevation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). During infection, uncontrolled ROS accumulation drives hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) to toxic levels of 100 to 1,000 μM while generating excessive superoxide anions (O₂•−) and hydroxyl radicals (•OH) [3]. Such unregulated oxidative stress severely compromises bone healing through dual mechanisms: It directly damages tissue integrity through lipid peroxidation and protein modifications while disrupting the bone remodeling balance by simultaneously suppressing osteoblasts and activating osteoclasts [4]. The key challenge lies in the random, widespread distribution of these harmful ROS species throughout the infected tissue, which creates an environment that impairs both immune function and tissue regeneration. This pathological oxidative landscape underscores the critical need for precise, localized ROS modulation strategies that can both eliminate pathogens and support healing processes.
The advent of nanozymes offers novel approaches, whereby their catalytic activity is exploited to generate antimicrobial agents directly within infected sites [5,6]. Nanozymes, which are typically metal-based nanomaterials, have been observed to possess enzyme-mimicking properties, including the ability to perform the functions of peroxidase, catalase (CAT), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) [79]. These properties facilitate not only direct combat against pathogens but also modulation of the local microenvironment, thereby aiding in soft tissue recovery and bone regeneration, as illustrated in Figure [1013].
The unique structural and physiological characteristics of bone tissue make nanozymes particularly promising for treating bone infections. While soft tissues generally respond well to standard antimicrobial therapies, bone's dense mineralized matrix and limited vasculature create substantial barriers for traditional drug delivery systems, further complicated by the distinctive acidic microenvironment (pH 5.5 to 6.5) that develops during osteomyelitis [14]. Nanozymes address these challenges through their optimally engineered dimensions (10 to 100 nm) that enable efficient bone penetration, enhanced catalytic activity in acidic conditions, and remarkable dual functionality in both bacterial elimination and osteogenic regeneration promotion, simultaneously targeting both the infectious and reconstructive aspects of bone healing [15].
Nanozymes exert their antibacterial effects primarily by mimicking the activity of natural enzymes and catalyzing specific reactions that generate bactericidal agents such as ROS [16,17] or hypochlorous acid (HClO) [18]. These substances effectively interfere with bacterial cell structures and metabolic functions, leading to bacterial cell death, particularly against multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains [1923]. The antibacterial efficacy of nanozymes depends on 2 key features of their catalytic reactions, such as enzyme-mimicking activity and ROS production [24]. The catalytic activities are highly condition-dependent: Optimal peroxidase-like activity of Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles occurs at pH 3.5 to 4.0 and 37 °C, with K m values of 3.84 mM for H₂O₂ and 0.098 mM for TMB substrate, achieving >99% bacterial killing rates at H₂O₂ concentrations of 0.1 to 1 mM. At physiological pH 7.4, the activity decreases by approximately 60%, necessitating higher H₂O₂ concentrations (>5 mM) for effective antibacterial action [25]. Certain nanozymes possess enzyme-like activities similar to those of natural peroxidases, such as horseradish peroxidase (HRP), enabling them to catalyze the decomposition of H₂O₂ under physiological conditions to produce ROS [26]. These ROS, including hydroxyl radicals (•OH), singlet oxygen (1O₂), and superoxide anions (O₂•−), have potent oxidative capabilities that can degrade bacterial cell membranes, DNA, proteins, and other cellular components, ultimately leading to bacterial death [27]. For example, Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles exhibit peroxidase-like activity, generating •OH in the presence of low concentrations of H₂O₂, effectively killing bacteria [17]. Similarly, manganese oxide (MnO₂) nanoparticles can modulate different oxidation states (Mn2+/Mn4+) to catalyze ROS production in the presence of H₂O₂ [28]. Under specific conditions, Mn2+-based nanozymes show optimal oxidase-like activity at pH 5.0 and 25 °C with a K m value of 0.21 mM for TMB, while Mn4+-based variants demonstrate enhanced peroxidase-like activity (K m = 0.87 mM for H₂O₂) at pH 4.0 and 40 °C. The catalytic efficiency (k cat/K m) shows a 3-fold increase as temperature rises from 25 °C to 40 °C, particularly beneficial at infection sites with elevated local temperatures [29]. In addition, nanozymes can mimic the activity of natural HClO-generating enzymes, catalyzing the conversion of chloride ions to HClO [18]. This compound rapidly disrupts bacterial cell walls and induces cell death due to its strong oxidative properties.
Nanozymes achieve broad-spectrum antibacterial effects by generating ROS or HClO that target a diverse array of bacterial species [3032]. These agents show activity against both gram-positive bacteria, such as Staphylococcus aureus, and gram-negative bacteria, including Escherichia coli. Notably, they also show activity against MDR strains. The cell wall architectures of MDR bacteria often pose important challenges to antibiotic permeation [3336]. Nanozymes can bypass these antibiotic targets by inducing nonselective oxidative stress mechanisms against bacteria, allowing effective eradication of resistant strains [37,38]. The nonspecific destruction of bacterial cell structures by chemically generated ROS or HClO makes it difficult for bacteria to develop resistance through genetic mutation. In addition, the rapid production of ROS and their potent oxidative effects lead to multiple types of damage within bacterial cells, accelerating bacterial death and further reducing the likelihood of resistance emergence [3941]. Despite the promising potential of nanozymes in antibacterial applications, several challenges remain. Issues relating to their stability, toxicity, and biocompatibility in vivo require further investigation. In particular, the SOD- and CAT-like activities of nanozymes require careful consideration in bone infection treatment. These antioxidant activities may reduce ROS levels and potentially compromise antibacterial efficacy. Therefore, when designing nanozymes for bone infections, priority should be given to enhancing their peroxidase-like activity to ensure sufficient antibacterial effects, while restricting antioxidant functions to the healing phase.
Bacterial biofilms represent a structural protective barrier composed of polysaccharides, proteins, and nucleic acids secreted by bacteria at infection sites [1,22,23,42,43]. These biofilms are prevalent in chronic bone infections and serve not only to shield bacteria from antibiotic action and host immune responses but also to facilitate the development of bacterial resistance, which substantially complicates treatment efforts [4447]. Some nanozymes possess sharp edges, such as true spine-like arrays, which enable them to not only chemically disrupt biofilms but also physically weaken their stability [4851]. The elevated surface area and nanoscale composition of these particles enable them to penetrate biofilms and directly disrupt their physical structure, thereby impairing bacterial adhesion.
The coapplication of nanozymes with traditional antibiotics represents a marked avenue of research in the treatment of bone infections. The integration of nanozymes with conventional antibiotics can markedly enhance antimicrobial efficacy, thereby increasing treatment effectiveness. This is achieved by combining the antibacterial properties of nanozymes with the therapeutic mechanisms of conventional antibiotics. The use of nanozymes can mitigate the development of bacterial resistance by disrupting the mechanisms employed by bacteria to evade treatment, such as the formation of biofilms and the interference with signaling pathways. This, in turn, enhances the efficacy of antibiotics [52,53]. Certain nanozymes can influence bacterial quorum-sensing mechanisms, reducing bacterial resistance to antibiotics and increasing the effectiveness of traditional therapies [5456]. The incorporation of nanozymes may facilitate the intracellular accumulation of antibiotics by modulating cell membrane permeability, thereby enabling antibiotics to enter bacterial cells with greater efficiency and enhancing their antibacterial effects. The use of nanozymes in conjunction with traditional antibiotics allows for a reduction in the dosage of the latter, thereby limiting the impact on normal bacterial populations and reducing the selective pressure for resistant strains. The combination of nanozymes and traditional antibiotics provides new avenues for the treatment of bone infections. The incorporation of different types of nanozymes and antibiotics in multitarget treatment strategies allows for a comprehensive approach to addressing complex bacterial infections, thereby improving the success rate of treatments.
Intelligently responsive nanozymes represent a class of nanomaterials that are capable of dynamically adjusting their catalytic activity in response to specific stimuli within their microenvironment. These stimuli may include changes in pH, H₂O₂ concentration, temperature, or external stimuli such as light, sound, heat, and electricity [52,57,58]. These nanozymes can achieve targeted activation in the unique pathological conditions present at infection sites, increasing their antibacterial activity while maintaining low activity in healthy tissues, thereby minimizing side effects [10,16,26]. This intelligent responsive design provides greater specificity and safety for the use of nanozymes, particularly in the treatment of complex infections [59]. The core functionality of intelligent responsive nanozymes lies in their structural design, which enables them to respond to specific environmental triggers and alter their catalytic capabilities [6062]. These responses are often associated with characteristics that differ between pathological environments and healthy tissues, such as acidic conditions and elevated H2O2 concentrations [58,63]. Su et al. designed a biofilm microenvironment-responsive double-layered metal-organic framework bionanocatalysts composed of MIL-100 and CuBTC. As an activable photothermal agent, 2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) was loaded into the mesopores of MIL-100, while glucose oxidase (GOx) was encapsulated within the framework of CuBTC, thus yielding a (MIL-100-ABTS)@(CuBTC-GOx) bionanocatalyst. Once the bionanocatalyst reached the acidic biofilm microenvironment, the outer CuBTC degraded to release GOx for catalyzing the conversion of glucose into H2O2 and gluconic acid, which increased the acidification of biofilm microenvironment to promote the degradation of CuBTC and accelerate the release of GOx/ABTS. Further, HRP-mimicking MIL-100 activated photothermal effect of MACG by ABTS oxidation in the presence of self-supplied H2O2. Upon near-infrared laser irradiation, the generated sufficient heat flow could loosen the dense biofilm via extracellular DNA damage and open the pore channels in the biofilm to reduce its resistance to •OH. Then, the Cu ion released from the degraded CuBTC depletes glutathione and catalyzed the splitting of extra H2O2 into •OH to kill sessile bacteria of inner biofilms without huge resistance [26]. In addition, infections and inflammatory responses often result in localized increases in temperature, which can trigger nanozyme activation. External stimuli such as near-infrared light and ultrasound can induce nanozymes to produce ROS. For example, Bai et al. recently developed a copper single-atom nanozyme system (CuNx-CNS) that demonstrates superior multienzyme activities and NIR-II responsiveness particularly suitable for deep tissue infections. In their work, they designed the system with atomically dispersed copper sites anchored on ultrathin 2D porous N-doped carbon nanosheets, with tunable N coordination numbers (x = 2 or 4). This nanozyme system exhibits triple enzyme-like activities (peroxidase, CAT, and oxidase), enabling efficient ROS generation through multiple pathways. Notably, their research showed that increasing the N coordination number from 2 to 4 enhances the multienzyme activities due to optimized electron structure. The system's strong absorption in the second near-infrared (NIR-II) biowindow enables deeper tissue penetration, facilitating both enhanced ROS generation and photothermal treatment in deep tissues, making it particularly effective against MDR bacteria and stubborn biofilms in both superficial and deep implant-related infections [24]. In addition, different bacterial species have specific microenvironmental characteristics and metabolites that can also be used as sources of triggers for nanozymatic catalytic reactions [26]. Through these intelligent response mechanisms, nanozymes hold great promise for advancing targeted therapeutic strategies, increasing the efficacy of infection treatments while minimizing adverse effects on surrounding healthy tissues.
The promotion of bone regeneration represents an important potential avenue for the utilization of nanozymes in the management of bone infections [64,65]. In addition to their antibacterial properties, nanozymes have the potential to facilitate the repair and regeneration of bone tissue by regulating oxidative stress within the body and promoting osteoblast proliferation and differentiation [66,67]. Bone infections and injuries are frequently accompanied by heightened inflammatory responses and oxidative stress. Consequently, modulation of this microenvironment is of paramount importance for the promotion of bone regeneration [68]. Bone repair and regeneration involves complex cellular behavior and microenvironmental regulation, including the synergistic actions of osteoblasts (bone formation), osteoclasts (bone resorption), and mesenchymal cells [69]. During the healing process of bone infections or defects, excessive ROS can exacerbate tissue damage while inhibiting the proliferation and differentiation of osteoblasts, thereby hindering bone tissue repair [70,71]. It is therefore of the utmost importance to control ROS levels and mitigate the effects of oxidative stress on the bone repair microenvironment. Specific nanozymes have the capacity to emulate the function of natural SOD, facilitating the conversion of O₂•− into H₂O₂ and oxygen (O₂), which serves to mitigate the damaging effects of oxidative stress and safeguard osteoblasts [7275]. Nanozymes that exhibit CAT-like activity can further convert excess H₂O₂ into H₂O and O₂, thereby reducing inflammatory responses and enhancing the bone repair microenvironment [7680]. In addition to regulating oxidative stress, nanozymes with metal ions can directly promote osteoblast differentiation and mineralization by modulating cellular signaling pathways [8184]. These multifaceted mechanisms have led to the emergence of nanozymes as a promising agent for advancing bone regeneration, which ultimately improves outcomes in the treatment of bone infections and injuries.
The specific advantages of nanozymes in bone infection treatment are particularly evident in their interaction with bone tissue. Their nanoscale dimensions allow them to penetrate the hierarchical structure of bone tissue, including micropores (10 to 20 μm) and canaliculi (0.1 to 1 μm), enabling better distribution throughout infected sites. Furthermore, the acidic microenvironment (pH 5.5 to 6.5) characteristic of osteomyelitis actually enhances the peroxidase-like activity of certain nanozymes, such as Fe3O4 nanoparticles, making them more effective precisely where needed [85]. The presence of elevated H2O2 levels (100 to 1,000 μM) in infected bone tissue provides an ideal substrate for nanozyme-mediated ROS generation. Additionally, nanozymes can specifically bind to hydroxyapatite in bone tissue through surface modification with bisphosphonate groups, enabling targeted and prolonged therapeutic effects. This bone-specific targeting, combined with their ability to modulate the RANKL (receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-Β ligand)/RANK (receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-Β)/OPG (osteoprotegerin) pathway crucial for bone homeostasis, makes nanozymes particularly suitable for treating bone infections [86].
The utilization of nanozymes in the diagnosis of bone infections is a promising avenue of research, particularly given the enzyme-mimicking properties of nanozymes, which facilitate the sensitive and selective detection of bacterial pathogens, biomarkers, and infection-related by-products [8790]. In the context of bone infections, traditional diagnostic methods such as microbial cultures frequently encounter limitations due to the sluggish growth rates of pathogens and the formation of biofilms that serve to protect bacteria. Nanozymes have the potential to provide solutions by accelerating the detection of pathogens and improving sensitivity [91,92]. To illustrate, nanozymes exhibiting peroxidase-like activity can facilitate reactions with H₂O₂ in the presence of chromogenic substrates, resulting in discernible color changes that indicate the presence of an infection [93]. The integration of nanozymes with biosensors has further enhanced their capacity to provide real-time data on infection status, thereby facilitating the implementation of timely clinical interventions. These developments illustrate the dual diagnostic and therapeutic potential of nanozymes in the management of bone infections. Further research into nanozyme-based detection may facilitate earlier diagnosis, reduce the necessity for invasive sampling, and facilitate the monitoring of treatment efficacy in the management of bone infections.
Long-term safety concerns specifically relate to several aspects of nanozyme behavior in vivo. The catalytic nature of nanozymes means they can potentially maintain activity for extended periods, raising questions about chronic ROS exposure even at low levels. Metal-based nanozymes may undergo gradual degradation, leading to accumulation of metal ions that could affect bone mineralization processes or cellular function [94]. The interaction between nanozymes and the bone extracellular matrix over time requires careful evaluation, as changes in nanozyme surface properties during long-term residence might alter their activity or distribution.
The implementation of personalized treatment is becoming an increasingly crucial aspect in the management of bone infections, particularly when integrated with modern precision medicine technologies that facilitate the development of bespoke therapeutic strategies. The identification of specific biomarkers and the utilization of gene editing techniques permit the design of nanozymes that are capable of targeting a range of bone infection types and severities. This approach enhances both the efficacy and safety of treatments. As our comprehension of individual differences grows, precision medicine places an emphasis on the consideration of patients' genetic backgrounds, pathological features, and environmental factors in therapeutic approaches. In the treatment of bone infections, this personalized approach allows for the optimization of strategies based on the nature of the infection, the type of pathogen involved, and the patient's overall health status. Personalized treatment is not confined to the utilization of static protocols; it can also employ real-time monitoring technologies to facilitate dynamic adjustments to treatment efficacy. By continuously monitoring changes in the infection, clinicians can promptly modify the dosage and release the timing of nanozymes in accordance with the patient's response, thereby achieving a tailored therapeutic outcome. Moreover, intelligent release systems that integrate biosensor technologies with smart nanozyme platforms can facilitate real-time monitoring of intracellular ROS levels, pH, or concentrations of specific biomarkers. These systems are capable of automatically adjusting the release and activity of nanozymes based on these metrics, thereby enabling precision treatment in the context of infection management. This innovative approach has the potential to revolutionize the treatment landscape for bone infections, offering the possibility of more effective and personalized care that is tailored to the distinct clinical circumstances of each patient. Future research should aim to elucidate the mechanisms underlying nanozymes and corroborate their clinical utility, thus propelling this emerging field forward.
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China(82472463)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China(82272512)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China(82102586)
  • Anhui Provincial Key Research and Development Program-Clinical Medical Research Translation Specialization (202304295107020020)
  • Anhui Provincial Scientific Research Compilation Project(2022AH051251)
  • Anhui Provincial Scientific Research Compilation Project(2022AH010076)
  • Research Funds of Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM(2023IHM01070)
  • Research Funds of Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM(2023IHM01074)
1.
Arciola CR, Campoccia D, Montanaro L. Implant infections: Adhesion, biofilm formation and immune evasion. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018;16(7):397–409.
2.
Amin Yavari S, Castenmiller SM, van Strijp JAG, Croes M. Combating implant infections: Shifting focus from bacteria to host. Adv Mater. 2020;32(43):2002962.
3.
Cao B, Da X, Wu W, Xie J, Li X, Wang X, Xu H, Gao J, Yang H, Su J. Multifunctional human serum albumin-crosslinked and self-assembling nanoparticles for therapy of periodontitis by anti-oxidation, anti-inflammation and osteogenesis. Mater Today Bio. 2024;28: Article 101163.
4.
Zhang H, Pertiwi H, Michiels J, Gaublomme D, Majdeddin M, Hou Y, Boone M, Elewaut D, Josipovic I, Degroote J. Improvement of antioxidant capability by dietary N-acetyl cysteine supplementation alleviates bone loss induced by chronic heat stress in finisher broilers. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2024;15(1):158.
5.
Chen ZW, Wang ZZ, Ren JS, Qu XG. Enzyme mimicry for combating bacteria and biofilms. Acc Chem Res. 2018;51(3):789–799.
6.
Wang Q, Jiang J, Gao L. Catalytic antimicrobial therapy using nanozymes. WIREs Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2022;14(2): Article e1769.
7.
Huang Y, Ren J, Qu X. Nanozymes: Classification, catalytic mechanisms, activity regulation, and applications. Chem Rev. 2019;119(6):4357–4412.
8.
Liang M, Yan X. Nanozymes: From new concepts, mechanisms, and standards to applications. Acc Chem Res. 2019;52(8):2190–2200.
9.
Zandieh M, Liu J. Nanozymes: Definition, activity, and mechanisms. Adv Mater. 2024;36(10):2211041.
10.
Su Z, Kong L, Dai Y, Tang J, Mei J, Qian Z, Ma Y, Li Q, Ju S, Wang J, et al. Bioresponsive nano-antibacterials for H2S-sensitized hyperthermia and immunomodulation against refractory implant-related infections. Sci Adv. 2022;8(14):eabn1701.
11.
Dong J, Zhou W, Hu X, Bai J, Zhang S, Zhang X, Yu L, Yang P, Kong L, Liu M, et al. Honeycomb-inspired ZIF-sealed interface enhances osseointegration via anti-infection and osteoimmunomodulation. Biomaterials. 2024;307: Article 122515.
12.
Su Z, Xu D, Hu X, Zhu W, Kong L, Qian Z, Mei J, Ma R, Shang X, Fan W, et al. Biodegradable oxygen-evolving metalloantibiotics for spatiotemporal sono-metalloimmunotherapy against orthopaedic biofilm infections. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):8058.
13.
Mei J, Xu D, Wang L, Kong L, Liu Q, Li Q, Zhang X, Su Z, Hu X, Zhu W, et al. Biofilm microenvironment-responsive self-assembly Nanoreactors for all-stage biofilm associated infection through bacterial cuproptosis-like death and macrophage re-rousing. Adv Mater. 2023;35(36):2303432.
14.
Wei G, Liu S, Peng Y-K, Wei H. On the specificity of nanozymes: A perspective. Chin J Chem. 2024;42(13):1515–1522.
15.
Yu Y, Zhao S, Gu D, Zhu B, Liu H, Wu W, Wu J, Wei H, Miao L. Cerium oxide nanozyme attenuates periodontal bone destruction by inhibiting the ROS–NFκB pathway. Nanoscale. 2022;14(7):2628–2637.
16.
Wang Z, Zhang X, Liu Q, Hu X, Mei J, Zhou J, Zhang X, Xu D, Zhu W, Su Z, et al. Balancing bioresponsive biofilm eradication and guided tissue repair via pro-efferocytosis and bidirectional pyroptosis regulation during implant surgery. ACS Nano. 2024;18(20):13196–13213.
17.
Zhu W, Mei J, Zhang X, Zhou J, Xu D, Su Z, Fang S, Wang J, Zhang X, Zhu C. Photothermal nanozyme-based microneedle patch against refractory bacterial biofilm infection via iron-actuated Janus ion therapy. Adv Mater. 2022;34(51):2207961.
18.
Chen Y, Chen F, He X, Guo C, Cheng C, Wu Z, He Y, Zhang W, Cui F, Wang Y, et al. Myeloperoxidase-mimetic nanozyme generates hypochlorous acid for phagosomal bacteria elimination. Nano Today. 2024;54: Article 102137.
19.
Price EE, Boyd JM. Genetic regulation of metal ion homeostasis in Staphylococcus aureus. Trends Microbiol. 2020;28(10):821–831.
20.
Chandrangsu P, Rensing C, Helmann JD. Metal homeostasis and resistance in bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017;15(6):338–350.
21.
Rowe SE, Wagner NJ, Li L, Beam JE, Wilkinson AD, Radlinski LC, Zhang Q, Miao EA, Conlon BP. Reactive oxygen species induce antibiotic tolerance during systemic Staphylococcus aureus infection. Nat Microbiol. 2020;5(2):282–290.
22.
Rumbaugh KP, Sauer K. Biofilm dispersion. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2020;18(10):571–586.
23.
Nadell CD, Drescher K, Foster KR. Spatial structure, cooperation and competition in biofilms. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016;14(9):589–600.
24.
Bai J, Feng Y, Li W, Cheng Z, Rosenholm JM, Yang H, Pan G, Zhang H, Geng D. Alternative copper-based single-atom nanozyme with superior multienzyme activities and NIR-II responsiveness to fight against deep tissue infections. Research. 2023;6:0031.
25.
Wang N, Zhu L, Wang M, Wang D, Tang H. Sono-enhanced degradation of dye pollutants with the use of H2O2 activated by Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles as peroxidase mimetic. Ultrason Sonochem. 2010;17(1):78–83.
26.
Su Z, Kong L, Mei J, Li Q, Qian Z, Ma Y, Chen Y, Ju S, Wang J, Jia W, et al. Enzymatic bionanocatalysts for combating peri-implant biofilm infections by specific heat-amplified chemodynamic therapy and innate immunomodulation. Drug Resist Updat. 2023;67: Article 100917.
27.
Yang B, Chen Y, Shi J. Reactive oxygen species (ROS)-based nanomedicine. Chem Rev. 2019;119(8):4881–4985.
28.
Zhao Z, Dong S, Liu Y, Wang J, Ba L, Zhang C, Cao X, Wu C, Yang P. Tumor microenvironment-activable manganese-boosted catalytic immunotherapy combined with PD-1 checkpoint blockade. ACS Nano. 2022;16(12):20400–20418.
29.
Dega NK, Ganganboina AB, Tran HL, Kuncoro EP, Doong RA. BSA-stabilized manganese phosphate nanoflower with enhanced nanozyme activity for highly sensitive and rapid detection of glutathione. Talanta. 2022;237: Article 122957.
30.
Wei F, Cui X, Wang Z, Dong C, Li J, Han X. Recoverable peroxidase-like Fe3O4@MoS2-Ag nanozyme with enhanced antibacterial ability. Chem Eng J. 2021;408: Article 127240.
31.
Pan Y, Sun D, Kong L, Liu Y, Li H, Yu D, Jiang W, Zhan J. Self-adaptive carbon nanozyme regulation of ROS balance for bacteria-infected wound therapy. Chem Eng J. 2024;499: Article 155904.
32.
Wang M, Li N, Lin N, Wu Y, Zhou W, Sun X, Wu P, Fu Q, Wang W, Liu Z, et al. Norepinephrine-induced hydrophilic Pd aerogels with photothermal-boosted multienzyme-like activity for chemodynamic therapy of MRSA infections. Chem Eng J. 2024;484: Article 149447.
33.
Lewis K. The science of antibiotic discovery. Cell. 2020;181(1):29–45.
34.
Bergkessel M, Forte B, Gilbert IH. Small-molecule antibiotic drug development: Need and challenges. ACS Infect Dis. 2023;9(11):2062–2071.
35.
Teng J, Imani S, Zhou A, Zhao Y, Du L, Deng S, Li J, Wang Q. Combatting resistance: Understanding multi-drug resistant pathogens in intensive care units. Biomed Pharmacother. 2023;167: Article 115564.
36.
Baker SJ, Payne DJ, Rappuoli R, De Gregorio E. Technologies to address antimicrobial resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115(51):12887–12895.
37.
Gao F, Shao T, Yu Y, Xiong Y, Yang L. Surface-bound reactive oxygen species generating nanozymes for selective antibacterial action. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):745.
38.
Wang T, Lai L, Huang Y, Su E. Nanozyme: An emerging tool for food packaging. Food Control. 2024;155: Article 110104.
39.
Qi W, Jonker MJ, de Leeuw W, Brul S, ter Kuile BH. Reactive oxygen species accelerate de novo acquisition of antibiotic resistance in E. coli. iScience. 2023;26(12): Article 108373.
40.
Cheng X, Zhang S, Liu H, Chen H, Zhou J, Chen Z, Zhou X, Xie Z, Kuang Q, Zheng L. Biomimetic metal–organic framework composite-mediated cascade catalysis for synergistic bacteria killing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12(33):36996–37005.
41.
Liu X, Yan Z, Zhang Y, Liu Z, Sun Y, Ren J, Qu X. Two-dimensional metal–organic framework/enzyme hybrid nanocatalyst as a benign and self-activated cascade reagent for in vivo wound healing. ACS Nano. 2019;13(5):5222–5230.
42.
Upadhayay A, Ling J, Pal D, Xie Y, Ping F-F, Kumar A. Resistance-proof antimicrobial drug discovery to combat global antimicrobial resistance threat. Drug Resist Updat. 2023;66: Article 100890.
43.
Beroz F, Yan J, Meir Y, Sabass B, Stone HA, Bassler BL, Wingreen NS. Verticalization of bacterial biofilms. Nat Phys. 2018;14(9):954–960.
44.
Wu Y-K, Cheng N-C, Cheng C-M. Biofilms in chronic wounds: Pathogenesis and diagnosis. Trends Biotechnol. 2019;37(5):505–517.
45.
Watters C, Fleming D, Bishop D, Rumbaugh KP. Host responses to biofilm. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2016;142:193–239.
46.
Stewart PS, William Costerton J. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. Lancet. 2001;358(9276):135–138.
47.
Prabhakara R, Harro JM, Leid JG, Harris M, Shirtliff ME. Murine immune response to a chronic Staphylococcus aureus biofilm infection. Infect Immun. 2011;79(4):1789–1796.
48.
Song N, Yu Y, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Guo Z, Zhang J, Zhang C, Liang M. Bioinspired hierarchical self-assembled nanozyme for efficient antibacterial treatment. Adv Mater. 2024;36(10):2210455.
49.
Long Y, Li L, Xu T, Wu X, Gao Y, Huang J, He C, Ma T, Ma L, Cheng C, et al. Hedgehog artificial macrophage with atomic-catalytic centers to combat drug-resistant bacteria. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):6143.
50.
Hu Z, Shan J, Jin X, Sun W, Cheng L, Chen X-L, Wang X. Nanoarchitectonics of in situ antibiotic-releasing acicular nanozymes for targeting and inducing cuproptosis-like death to eliminate drug-resistant bacteria. ACS Nano. 2024;18(35):24327–24349.
51.
Fan X, Wu X, Yang F, Wang L, Ludwig K, Ma L, Trampuz A, Cheng C, Haag R. A nanohook-equipped bionanocatalyst for localized near-infrared-enhanced catalytic bacterial disinfection. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2022;61(8): Article e202113833.
52.
Jiang D, Ni D, Rosenkrans ZT, Huang P, Yan X, Cai W. Nanozyme: New horizons for responsive biomedical applications. Chem Soc Rev. 2019;48(14):3683–3704.
53.
Hu C, He G, Yang Y, Wang N, Zhang Y, Su Y, Zhao F, Wu J, Wang L, Lin Y, et al. Nanomaterials regulate bacterial quorum sensing: Applications, mechanisms, and optimization strategies. Adv Sci. 2024;11(15):2306070.
54.
Zou L, Li X, Huang Y, Wang C, Fang Y, Zhao J, Jin Q, Ji J. Raspberry-like gold nanozyme-hybrid liposomes for hypoxia-enhanced biofilm eradication. Nano Today. 2023;50: Article 101828.
55.
Zhang Y, Hu X, Shang J, Shao W, Jin L, Quan C, Li J. Emerging nanozyme-based multimodal synergistic therapies in combating bacterial infections. Theranostics. 2022;12(13):5995–6020.
56.
Chen Y, Gao Y, Huang Y, Jin Q, Ji J. Inhibiting quorum sensing by active targeted pH-sensitive nanoparticles for enhanced antibiotic therapy of biofilm-associated bacterial infections. ACS Nano. 2023;17(11):10019–10032.
57.
Xu Y, Luo Y, Weng Z, Xu H, Zhang W, Li Q, Liu H, Liu L, Wang Y, Liu X, et al. Microenvironment-responsive metal-phenolic nanozyme release platform with antibacterial, ROS scavenging, and osteogenesis for periodontitis. ACS Nano. 2023;17(19):18732–18746.
58.
Wang X, Ye Z, Lin S, Wei L, Xiao L. Nanozyme-triggered cascade reactions from cup-shaped nanomotors promote active cellular targeting. Research. 2022;2022:9831012.
59.
Jin L, Cao F, Gao Y, Zhang C, Qian Z, Zhang J, Mao Z. Microenvironment-activated nanozyme-armed bacteriophages efficiently combat bacterial infection. Adv Mater. 2023;35(30):2301349.
60.
Sun D, Pang X, Cheng Y, Ming J, Xiang S, Zhang C, Lv P, Chu C, Chen X, Liu G, et al. Ultrasound-switchable nanozyme augments sonodynamic therapy against multidrug-resistant bacterial infection. ACS Nano. 2020;14(2):2063–2076.
61.
Du X, Jia B, Wang W, Zhang C, Liu X, Qu Y, Zhao M, Li W, Yang Y, Li Y-Q. pH-switchable nanozyme cascade catalysis: A strategy for spatial–temporal modulation of pathological wound microenvironment to rescue stalled healing in diabetic ulcer. J Nanobiotechnol. 2022;20(1):12.
62.
Neri S, Garcia Martin S, Pezzato C, Prins LJ. Photoswitchable catalysis by a nanozyme mediated by a light-sensitive cofactor. J Am Chem Soc. 2017;139(5):1794–1797.
63.
Hu Y, Zeng G, Wang Y, Yang D. Nanorobots to treat Candida albicans infection. Research. 2024;7:0455.
64.
Wang Q, Yan J, Yang J, Li B. Nanomaterials promise better bone repair. Mater Today. 2016;19(8):451–463.
65.
Bai L, Song P, Su J. Bioactive elements manipulate bone regeneration. Biomater Transl. 2023;4(4):248–269.
66.
Yi H, Ur Rehman F, Zhao C, Liu B, He N. Recent advances in nano scaffolds for bone repair. Bone Res. 2016;4:16050.
67.
Yang W, Yue H, Lu G, Wang W, Deng Y, Ma G, Wei W. Advances in delivering oxidative modulators for disease therapy. Research. 2022;2022:9897464.
68.
Koons GL, Diba M, Mikos AG. Materials design for bone-tissue engineering. Nat Rev Mater. 2020;5:584–603.
69.
Li Y, Liu C. Nanomaterial-based bone regeneration. Nanoscale. 2017;9:4862–4874.
70.
Cai J, Liu L-F, Qin Z, Liu S, Wang Y, Chen Z, Yao Y, Zheng L, Zhao J, Gao M. Natural morin-based metal organic framework nanoenzymes modulate articular cavity microenvironment to alleviate osteoarthritis. Research. 2023;6:0068.
71.
Chu X, Xiong Y, Knoedler S, Lu L, Panayi AC, Alfertshofer M, Jiang D, Rinkevich Y, Lin Z, Zhao Z, et al. Immunomodulatory nanosystems: Advanced delivery tools for treating chronic wounds. Research. 2023;6:0198.
72.
Liu Y, Cheng Y, Zhang H, Zhou M, Yu Y, Lin S, Jiang B, Zhao X, Miao L, Wei C-W, et al. Integrated cascade nanozyme catalyzes in vivo ROS scavenging for anti-inflammatory therapy. Sci Adv. 2020;6(29):eabb2695.
73.
Wang Z, Wu J, Zheng J-J, Shen X, Yan L, Wei H, Gao X, Zhao Y. Accelerated discovery of superoxide-dismutase nanozymes via high-throughput computational screening. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):6866.
74.
Le W, Sun Z, Li T, Cao H, Yang C, Mei T, Zhang L, Wang Y, Jia W, Sun W, et al. Antioxidant nanozyme-engineered mesenchymal stem cells for in vivo MRI tracking and synergistic therapy of myocardial infarction. Adv Funct Mater. 2024;34(23):2314328.
75.
Song G, Xu J, Zhong H, Zhang Q, Wang X, Lin Y, Beckman SP, Luo Y, He X, Li J-C, et al. Single-atom Ce-N4-C-(OH)2 nanozyme-catalyzed cascade reaction to alleviate hyperglycemia. Research. 2023;6:0095.
76.
Liu J, Shi L, Wang Y, Li M, Zhou C, Zhang L, Yao C, Yuan Y, Fu D, Deng Y, et al. Ruthenium-based metal-organic framework with reactive oxygen and nitrogen species scavenging activities for alleviating inflammation diseases. Nano Today. 2022;47: Article 101627.
77.
Zhang Y, Wang F, Liu C, Wang Z, Kang L, Huang Y, Dong K, Ren J, Qu X. Nanozyme decorated metal–organic frameworks for enhanced photodynamic therapy. ACS Nano. 2018;12(1):651–661.
78.
Xu J, Wu M, Yang J, Zhao D, He D, Liu Y, Yan X, Liu Y, Pu D, Tan Q, et al. Multimodal smart systems reprogramme macrophages and remove urate to treat gouty arthritis. Nat Nanotechnol. 2024;19(10):1544–1557.
79.
Zhang R, Xue B, Tao Y, Zhao H, Zhang Z, Wang X, Zhou X, Jiang B, Yang Z, Yan X, et al. Edge-site engineering of defective Fe-N4 nanozymes with boosted catalase-like performance for retinal vasculopathies. Adv Mater. 2022;34(39):2205324.
80.
Du X, Zhang M, Zhou H, Wang W, Zhang C, Zhang L, Qu Y, Li W, Liu X, Zhao M, et al. Decoy nanozymes enable multitarget blockade of proinflammatory cascades for the treatment of multi-drug-resistant bacterial sepsis. Research. 2022;2022:9767643.
81.
Wang R, Shi M, Xu F, Qiu Y, Zhang P, Shen K, Zhao Q, Yu J, Zhang Y. Graphdiyne-modified TiO2 nanofibers with osteoinductive and enhanced photocatalytic antibacterial activities to prevent implant infection. Nat Commun. 2020;11:4465.
82.
Shen X, Zhang Y, Ma P, Sutrisno L, Luo Z, Hu Y, Yu Y, Tao B, Li C, Cai K. Fabrication of magnesium/zinc-metal organic framework on titanium implants to inhibit bacterial infection and promote bone regeneration. Biomaterials. 2019;212:1–16.
83.
He P, Zhao Y, Wang B, Liu G, Zhang L, Li M, Xu B, Cai W, Chu C, Cong Y. A biodegradable magnesium phosphate cement incorporating chitosan and rhBMP-2 designed for bone defect repair. J Orthop Translat. 2024;49:167–180.
84.
Wang Q, Wang W, Li Y, Li W, Tan L, Yang K. Biofunctional magnesium coating of implant materials by physical vapour deposition. Biomater Transl. 2021;2(3):248–256.
85.
Wu J, Wang X, Wang Q, Lou Z, Li S, Zhu Y, Qin L, Wei H. Nanomaterials with enzyme-like characteristics (nanozymes): Next-generation artificial enzymes (II). Chem Soc Rev. 2019;48(4):1004–1076.
86.
Xu K-X, Yuan C, Lou H, Chen F-Z, Zhang L, Chen G, Han D-M, Zhao W-W. Metal-organic framework nanozyme enabling dual-functional photo-induced charge transfer and biomimetic precipitation for advanced organic photoelectrochemical transistor bioanalysis. Chin J Chem. 2024;42(17):1999–2004.
87.
Wang K, Meng X, Yan X, Fan K. Nanozyme-based point-of-care testing: Revolutionizing environmental pollutant detection with high efficiency and low cost. Nano Today. 2024;54: Article 102145.
88.
Liu R, Ye X, Cui T. Recent progress of biomarker detection sensors. Research. 2020;2020:7949037.
89.
Huang J, Zu Y, Zhang L, Cui W. Progress in procalcitonin detection based on immunoassay. Research. 2024;7:0345.
90.
Lyu Z, Ding S, Zhang N, Zhou Y, Cheng N, Wang M, Xu M, Feng Z, Niu X, Cheng Y, et al. Single-atom nanozymes linked immunosorbent assay for sensitive detection of Aβ 1-40: A biomarker of Alzheimer's disease. Research. 2020;2020:4724505.
91.
Hu W-C, Pang J, Biswas S, Wang K, Wang C, Xia X-H. Ultrasensitive detection of bacteria using a 2D MOF Nanozyme-amplified electrochemical detector. Anal Chem. 2021;93(24):8544–8552.
92.
Wang J, Hui P, Zhang X, Cai X, Lian J, Liu X, Lu X, Chen W. Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing based on a bio-inspired chemiluminescence sensor. Anal Chem. 2022;94(49):17240–17247.
93.
Xing G, Shang Y, Ai J, Lin H, Wu Z, Zhang Q, Lin J-M, Pu Q, Lin L. Nanozyme-mediated catalytic signal amplification for microfluidic biosensing of foodborne bacteria. Anal Chem. 2023;95(35):13391–13399.
94.
Li T, Wang X, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Li S, Liu W, Liu S, Liu Y, Xing H, Otake K-I, et al. Microenvironmental modulation breaks intrinsic pH limitations of nanozymes to boost their activities. Nat Commun. 2024;15:10861.
Year 2025 volume 8 Issue 2
PDF
253
139
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.34133/research.0605
  • Receive Date:2024-11-19
  • Online Date:2025-07-23
  • Published:2025-02-11
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2024-11-19
  • Revised:2025-01-09
  • Accepted:2025-01-16
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China(82472463)
National Natural Science Foundation of China(82272512)
National Natural Science Foundation of China(82102586)
Anhui Provincial Key Research and Development Program-Clinical Medical Research Translation Specialization (202304295107020020)
Anhui Provincial Scientific Research Compilation Project(2022AH051251)
Anhui Provincial Scientific Research Compilation Project(2022AH010076)
Research Funds of Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM(2023IHM01070)
Research Funds of Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM(2023IHM01074)
Affiliations
    Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230001, China.

Corresponding:

* Address correspondence to: (Z.S.); (C.Z.)
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/research/EN/10.34133/research.0605
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT