收藏切换
Fusobacterium nucleatum in Colorectal Cancer: Ally Mechanism and Targeted Therapy Strategies
收藏切换
PDF
Junna Lu1, Wei Wei1, 2, *, Diwei Zheng1, 2, *
Research. Vol 8 Article ID 0640
Less
收藏切换
Research. Vol 8 Article ID 0640
Perspective
Fusobacterium nucleatum in Colorectal Cancer: Ally Mechanism and Targeted Therapy Strategies
Full
Junna Lu1, Wei Wei1, 2, *, Diwei Zheng1, 2, *
Affiliations
  • 1 State Key Laboratory of Biopharmaceutical Preparation and Delivery, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
  • 2 School of Chemical Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Published: 2025-04-09 doi: 10.34133/research.0640
Outline
收藏切换

Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn), an oral anaerobic commensal, has recently been identified as a crucial oncogenic contributor to colorectal cancer pathogenesis through its ectopic colonization in the gastrointestinal tract. Accumulating evidence reveals its multifaceted involvement in colorectal cancer initiation, progression, metastasis, and therapeutic resistance to conventional treatments, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy. This perspective highlights recent advances in anti-Fn strategies, including small-molecule inhibitors, nanomedicines, and biopharmaceuticals, while critically analyzing the translational barriers in developing targeted antimicrobial interventions. We further propose potential strategies to overcome current challenges in Fn modulation, aiming to pave the way for more effective therapeutic interventions and better clinical outcomes.

Junna Lu, Wei Wei, Diwei Zheng. Fusobacterium nucleatum in Colorectal Cancer: Ally Mechanism and Targeted Therapy Strategies[J]. Research, 2025 , 8 (4) : 0640 . DOI: 10.34133/research.0640
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the most prevalent malignancies of the digestive tract, ranking third globally in incidence and second in cancer-related mortality [1]. It is a highly heterogeneous malignancy with distinct histopathological, molecular, and clinical characteristics. Histopathologically, early-stage CRC is confined to the mucosal or submucosal layers and presents in 2 primary morphological forms: polypoid and flat-elevated types. As CRC progresses, it adopts more aggressive invasion patterns, classified as exophytic (cauliflower-like), ulcerative (craterlike), and infiltrative types. At the molecular level, CRC pathogenesis follows 3 principal pathways: the adenoma–carcinoma sequence, the serrated pathway, and the inflammatory pathway, each contributing to tumor initiation and progression through distinct molecular mechanisms [2]. These pathways drive key genetic and epigenetic alterations that define CRC's molecular subtypes, including microsatellite instability, chromosomal instability with adenomatous polyposis coli mutations, and oncogenic drivers such as Kirsten rat sarcoma virus, v-RAF murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B, and caudal type homeobox 2 alterations [3]. Given this molecular heterogeneity, the therapeutic strategy for CRC is highly personalized; a multidisciplinary approach is frequently adopted, incorporating endoscopic interventions, surgical resection, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy in a tailored manner [4].
Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn) is a Gram-negative anaerobic bacterium commonly residing in the human oral cavity. It produces virulence factors that enhance its pathogenic potential, contributing to the development and progression of oral diseases such as odontogenic abscesses and periodontitis [5]. Fn exhibits a strong migratory capacity, enabling it to translocate from the oral cavity to the gut (Fig. 1), and has garnered considerable attention for its pivotal role in CRC pathogenesis. Studies have demonstrated that the oral and gut microbiota of CRC patients share comparable co-abundance networks, suggesting a potential ecological and evolutionary connection between these 2 microbial habitats [6]. Importantly, identical Fn strains have been isolated from both the colorectal tumor tissues and saliva samples of the same CRC patients, indicating that the Fn in colorectal tissues originates from the oral cavity [7]. Such evidence underscores the migratory behavior of Fn and its ability to maintain viability and pathogenicity across distinct niches.
Clinical studies have demonstrated that intratumoral levels of Fn are substantially elevated in CRC patients compared to those in normal tissues [8]. A high abundance of Fn is strongly associated with poorer patient prognosis and increased cancer recurrence [9,10]. Quantitative polymerase-chain-reaction-based analysis has revealed an inverse correlation between intratumoral Fn levels and CRC survival. Compared to Fn-negative cases, the hazard ratio for CRC-specific mortality was 1.25 in Fn-low cases and 1.58 in Fn-high cases [11]. These findings suggest that modulating Fn abundance could be a potential strategy for CRC treatment, offering new therapeutic avenues to improve patient outcomes.
Fn employs a repertoire of virulence factors, including FadA, Fap2, and RadD, as well as toxins such as lipopolysaccharides, which contribute to its pathogenicity and role in tumor biology [12]. Here, we first discuss the carcinogenic factors and the potential molecular mechanisms of Fn in CRC (Fig. 2). The primary pathogenic mechanism involves FadA-mediated cellular interactions, where this unique fusobacterial adhesin facilitates both adherence to and invasion of host epithelial and endothelial cells. This process disrupts endothelial integrity by increasing vascular permeability through junctional complex destabilization, enabling bacterial translocation across the endothelial barrier [13]. Afterward, FadA activates the E-cadherin/β-catenin signaling pathway, thereby stimulating the growth of CRC cells [14]. Under pathological conditions, the amyloid form of FadA enhances acid tolerance, further supporting Fn's gastrointestinal migration and colonization [15]. As CRC progresses, Fap2, a galactose (Gal)-specific lectin, mediates selective tumor colonization through specific interactions with Gal–N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) moieties that are abundantly expressed on malignant cells, thereby amplifying tumor progression [16]. Complementing these mechanisms, RadD facilitates Fn tumor colonization by interacting with the highly expressed receptor protein CD147 on CRC cells, contributing to Fn's pathogenic potential by orchestrating tumor microenvironment modifications that favor bacterial persistence and tumor growth [17]. Furthermore, Fn-derived adhesins demonstrate specific binding affinity for RNA helicase family proteins expressed on CRC cells, establishing additional molecular bridges between bacterial colonization and tumorigenesis [18]. In addition to adhesins, the lipopolysaccharides of Fn could activate the β-catenin signaling pathway, subsequently engaging the Toll-like receptor 4/p21-activated kinase 1 cascade in CRC cells, thereby accelerating tumor progression [19]. Collectively, these processes of bacterial adherence, invasion, and colonization enable tumorigenesis and progression.
In advanced stages, Fn is not only highly enriched in primary CRC sites but also capable of migrating to distant metastatic locations [20]. Fn directly enhances the metastatic potential of CRC cells through multiple molecular pathways. Fn enhances CRC metastasis by promoting tumor–endothelial adhesion through activation of the alpha kinase 1/nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells/intercellular adhesion molecule 1 axis, thereby facilitating extravasation and metastatic dissemination [21]. Moreover, Fn inhibits methyltransferase-like 3-mediated N6-methyladenosine RNA modification, a critical regulatory mechanism in tumor progression, further contributing to metastasis [22]. Beyond its direct effects on tumor cells, Fn orchestrates tumor microenvironment remodeling by recruiting myeloid-derived immune cells to infection sites and promotes pro-invasive transcriptional reprogramming in CRC epithelial cells, thereby promoting metastatic progression [23]. These findings highlight the multifaceted role of Fn in CRC pathogenesis and its potential as a promising therapeutic target for mitigating disease progression and metastasis.
Clinical evidence has established a strong correlation between elevated Fn abundance and adverse clinical outcomes in CRC patients, including reduced overall survival and increased recurrence rates [11]. During CRC treatment, Fn is associated with resistance to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy, considerably complicating disease management. One mechanism by which Fn drives chemotherapy resistance is through the induction of autophagy in CRC cells. Specifically, Fn promotes CRC cell survival by activating autophagy-related signaling pathways, thereby reducing the effectiveness of chemotherapeutic agents like 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin [24]. Wang et al. [25] demonstrated that Fn-induced chemoresistance in CRC is mediated, at least in part, through suppression of the Hippo signaling pathway, which protects tumor cells from chemotherapy-induced pyroptosis. Beyond chemotherapy, Fn also impaired the tumoricidal effects of radiation therapy and elicited CRC radioresistance [26]. The influence of Fn extends to immunotherapy resistance, actively shaping the development of an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. A key mechanism involves Fn-mediated recruitment of tumor-associated macrophages that exhibit elevated programmed death-ligand 1 expression, effectively suppressing T-cell-mediated antitumor immunity through immune checkpoint activation [27]. Furthermore, Fn-derived metabolic byproducts, particularly succinate and formate, play crucial roles in modulating local immune responses. These metabolites have been shown to alter immune cell function and polarization, ultimately contributing to diminished responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors and other immunotherapeutic approaches [28,29]. Collectively, these findings highlight the multifaceted role of Fn in conferring therapeutic resistance across multiple treatment modalities, underscoring the need for comprehensive strategies to overcome Fn-mediated treatment barriers in CRC management.
Given that Fn has a deep impact on the pathogenesis of CRC, targeting and eliminating Fn to disrupt its carcinogenic activity holds considerable potential for reducing its contribution to tumor progression and enhancing the efficacy of existing cancer treatment regimens. A variety of strategies have been proposed, spanning modalities such as small-molecule inhibitors, nanomedicines, and biopharmaceuticals. The following sections delve into these approaches.
Antibiotics are widely used antimicrobial agents, and most clinical isolates of Fn are sensitive to antibiotics such as metronidazole, clindamycin, and various β-lactam antibiotics. For example, metronidazole has been shown to reduce Fn burden in mice bearing patient-derived CRC xenografts, thereby inhibiting tumor growth [20]. Interestingly, beyond antibiotics, aspirin (a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug) [30] and lauric acid (a fatty acid) [31] can also reduce Fn abundance in CRC tissues. While small-molecule inhibitors offer a straightforward approach to eliminating Fn, their use is often associated with low bioavailability and disruption of beneficial gut microbiota. To address these limitations, advanced delivery systems have been developed. For instance, Wang et al. [32] developed liposome-encapsulated antibiotics, which specifically target Fn and preserve the broader microbiome. Liu et al. [33] engineered an Fn-derived outer-membrane-vesicle-coated nanoplatform delivering metronidazole, which precisely targets tumor tissues. Additionally, a tunable nanogel was developed to enable the cascade release of metronidazole and chemotherapeutic agents [34], and a targeted polymer was also designed to efficiently deliver lauric acid [35], with both delivery systems enhancing therapeutic outcomes against Fn-associated CRC. However, the use of small-molecule inhibitors inevitably disrupts the gut microbiota beyond Fn, potentially eliminating commensal bacteria with tumor-suppressive properties, which constitutes a substantial therapeutic limitation.
Nanomedicine-based antimicrobial approaches have shown strong capabilities in targeting and combating Fn. Au@BSA-CuPpIX nanoparticles effectively target Fn within tumors, generating reactive oxygen species under ultrasound, reducing anti-apoptotic protein levels, and promoting apoptosis [36]. Similarly, BSA-Cu single-atom nanozyme catalyzes reactive oxygen species production to eliminate Fn, suppress autophagy, and induce cancer cell apoptosis, disrupting the pathogen–tumor symbiosis [37]. Yan et al. [38] designed a positively charged polymer, polyamidoamine–lauric acid–cyclodextrin, with Fn inhibition capacity, specifically for the treatment of drug-resistant CRC. Additionally, a 2-dimensional metal–organic framework-based nanocomposite exhibits efficient antimicrobial activity against Fn [39]. Furthermore, Chen et al. [40] designed a nitroreductase-triggered supramolecular assembly technique, which selectively inhibits Fn and other cancer-promoting bacteria, thereby improving CRC treatment outcomes. Another novel strategy involves a GalNAc-derived nanomaterial that functions as a bacterial adhesion antagonist. This nanomaterial leverages GalNAc exposure to effectively inhibit Fn attachment to CRC cells through a Fap2-dependent competitive mechanism [41]. These studies underscore the versatility of nanomaterials in specifically targeting or combating Fn, offering innovative strategies to control its pathogenic effects and enhance CRC therapies.
Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) show promise in CRC treatment due to their ability to kill Fn by disrupting bacterial membranes. However, their short half-life has hindered clinical applications. To overcome this limitation, modified AMP derivatives have been developed; the derivatives specifically target the membrane-associated protein FadA to disrupt the Fn membrane, thereby suppressing Fn activity and inhibiting Fn-induced CRC growth [42]. Although AMPs exhibit certain species selectivity, they lack the precision required for targeted bacterial elimination. In contrast, phage therapy, with its strain-specific targeting capability, represents a superior strategy for the selective eradication of Fn. Zheng et al. [43] isolated a phage from human saliva capable of lysing Fn and developed a nanocarrier system combining irinotecan with phages to target Fn-enriched CRC tumors. Additionally, M13 phages conjugated with silver nanoparticles (M13@Ag) effectively eliminate Fn, and this strategy substantially improved survival outcomes in CRC mouse models [44].
Despite these therapies demonstrating potential for targeted Fn clearance in CRC treatment, most of these therapeutic strategies remain in the early stages of development and have inherent limitations. As the concept of targeting tumor-associated Fn in cancer therapy is still evolving, the development of new strategies, pathways, and targets to overcome these limitations will be essential for enhancing the applicability of treatments.
Fn subspecies adapt to the tumor niche through distinct genetic traits, and their dominance in promoting cancer progression makes specific evolutionary branches of Fn promising therapeutic targets. Studies show that Fn subspecies have historically been considered largely interchangeable in laboratory and clinical research. This misconception arises partly from the limitations of conventional 16S sequencing methods, as the 16S ribosomal RNA genes of Fn subspecies exhibit extensive sequence similarity [45]. Among these subspecies, pangenome analyses indicate active expression of Fusobacterium animalis (Fna) genes in CRC tumors, particularly within the mesenchymal subtype [46]. Recent genomic analyses challenge the notion of Fna as a single homogenous subspecies, revealing that Fna comprises 2 distinct clades: Fna C1 and Fna C2. Excitingly, Fna C2 is the dominant clade in the CRC tumor niche [47]. At present, eliminating Fn subspecies is an underexplored area in further research. This deeper understanding of Fn subspecies stratification, particularly the role of Fna and its clades, highlights the potential for developing tailored therapeutic strategies targeting specific Fn subspecies to more effectively mitigate their impact on cancer progression.
The intratumoral bacteria are predominantly intracellular, localized within both cancer cells and immune cells [48]. While vaccination can induce specific immune responses, some Fn evade immune clearance by invading tumor cells. A promising strategy involves developing novel approaches to target intratumoral Fn, disrupting their ability to hide and survive within host cells. At present, Meng et al. [49] described the use of cationic polymers to selectively cap phage heads, which remain intact and inhibit intracellular pathogenic bacteria. Similarly, Bai et al. [50] reported an oligoguanidine-based peptidomimetic that effectively targets and eradicates intracellular Staphylococcus aureus persisters within the phagolysosome lumen. Since these methods have been applied to only a limited number of intracellular bacterial pathogens, further studies are needed to explore their potential as a preferred strategy for targeting Fn.
Vaccine-based therapies represent a promising strategy for CRC treatment, enabling both specific Fn clearance through immune recognition of bacterial epitopes and effective elimination of intracellular bacterial reservoirs via induced cellular immunity. Live attenuated vaccines have been in use since the last century and remain a valuable approach in combating bacterial infections. In one study, mice immunized with ultraviolet-inactivated Fn showed a marked reduction in abscess progression, demonstrated by markedly decreased swelling of gingival pocket tissues. Notably, the immunized mice also produced neutralizing antibodies that effectively inhibited Fn's ability to generate volatile sulfur compounds, further highlighting the potential of this vaccination strategy [51]. Additionally, an antimicrobial vaccine mimicking the characteristics of Fn membranes has been developed, effectively eliminating Fn within tumors while preserving the gut- and tumor-associated microbiota [52].
Targeting Fn-specific virulence factors or host cell interaction receptors presents both opportunities and challenges for developing precise and effective immunotherapies against Fn-associated CRC. Liu et al. investigated vaccines targeting Fn's outer membrane protein FomA, originally studied in the context of halitosis, which have shown potential in eliciting immune responses. However, evidence supporting their efficacy in reducing CRC incidence remains limited [53]. Proteins such as RadD, Fap2, and FadA, which contain predicted T-cell epitopes, are promising candidate antigens for Fn vaccines. These antigens can elicit a T-cell response and have the potential to selectively eliminate Fn within the tumor microenvironment. Nevertheless, further research is needed to refine vaccine designs and optimize their effectiveness in mitigating Fn's role in CRC progression. For instance, incorporating immunological adjuvants into Fn vaccines may enhance their therapeutic efficacy by prolonging antigen persistence, amplifying costimulatory signaling, and promoting antigen-specific immune responses.
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China(32422042)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China(52203185)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China(T2225021)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China(2023YFC2307700)
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(2024M763294)
1.
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72(1):7–33.
2.
Keum N, Giovannucci E. Global burden of colorectal cancer: Emerging trends, risk factors and prevention strategies. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;16(12):713–732.
3.
Chen K, Collins G, Wang H, Toh J. Pathological features and prognostication in colorectal cancer. Curr Oncol. 2021;28(6):5356–5383.
4.
Ciardiello F, Ciardiello D, Martini G, Napolitano S, Tabernero J, Cervantes A. Clinical management of metastatic colorectal cancer in the era of precision medicine. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72(4):372–401.
5.
Chen Y, Shi T, Li Y, Huang L, Yin D. Fusobacterium nucleatum: The opportunistic pathogen of periodontal and peri-implant diseases. Front Microbiol. 2020;13: Article 860149.
6.
Flemer B, Warren RD, Barrett MP, Cisek K, Das A, Jeffery IB, Hurley E, O'Riordain M, Shanahan F, O'Toole PW. The oral microbiota in colorectal cancer is distinctive and predictive. Gut. 2018;67(8):1454–1463.
7.
Komiya Y, Shimomura Y, Higurashi T, Sugi Y, Arimoto J, Umezawa S, Uchiyama S, Matsumoto M, Nakajima A. Patients with colorectal cancer have identical strains of Fusobacterium nucleatum in their colorectal cancer and oral cavity. Gut. 2019;68(7):1335–1337.
8.
Brennan CA, Garrett WS. Fusobacterium nucleatum—Symbiont, opportunist and oncobacterium. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2019;17(3):156–166.
9.
Wong SH, Yu J. Gut microbiota in colorectal cancer: Mechanisms of action and clinical applications. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;16(11):690–704.
10.
Wei Z, Cao S, Liu S, Yao Z, Sun T, Li Y, Li J, Zhang D, Zhou Y. Could gut microbiota serve as prognostic biomarker associated with colorectal cancer patients' survival? A pilot study on relevant mechanism. Oncotarget. 2016;7(29):46158–46172.
11.
Mima K, Nishihara R, Qian ZR, Cao Y, Sukawa Y, Nowak JA, Yang J, Dou R, Masugi Y, Song M, et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum in colorectal carcinoma tissue and patient prognosis. Gut. 2016;65(12):1973–1980.
12.
Chen Z, Huang L. Fusobacterium nucleatum carcinogenesis and drug delivery interventions. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2024;209: Article 115319.
13.
Fardini Y, Wang X, Témoin S, Nithianantham S, Lee D, Shoham M, Han YW. Fusobacterium nucleatum adhesin FadA binds vascular endothelial cadherin and alters endothelial integrity. Mol Microbiol. 2011;82(6):1468–1480.
14.
Rubinstein MR, Wang X, Liu W, Hao Y, Cai G, Han Y. Fusobacterium nucleatum promotes colorectal carcinogenesis by modulating E-cadherin/β-catenin signaling via its FadA adhesin. Cell Host Microbe. 2013;14(2):195–206.
15.
Meng Q, Gao Q, Mehrazarin S, Tangwanichgapong K, Wang Y, Huang Y, Pan Y, Robinson S, Liu Z, Zangiabadi A, et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum secretes amyloid-like FadA to enhance pathogenicity. EMBO Rep. 2021;22(7): Article e52891.
16.
Abed J, Emgård JE, Zamir G, Faroja M, Almogy G, Grenov A, Sol A, Naor R, Pikarsky E, Atlan KA, et al. Fap2 mediates Fusobacterium nucleatum colorectal adenocarcinoma enrichment by binding to tumor-expressed Gal-GalNAc. Cell Host Microbe. 2016;20(2):215–225.
17.
Zhang L, Leng X-X, Qi J, Wang N, Han J-X, Tao Z-H, Zhuang ZY, Ren Y, Xie YL, Jiang SS, et al. The adhesin RadD enhances Fusobacterium nucleatum tumour colonization and colorectal carcinogenesis. Nat Microbiol. 2024;9(9):2292–2307.
18.
Zhu H, Li M, Bi D, Yang H, Gao Y, Song F. Fusobacterium nucleatum promotes tumor progression in KRAS p. G12D-mutant colorectal cancer by binding to DHX15. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1): Article 1688.
19.
Chen Y, Peng Y, Yu J, Chen T, Wu Y, Shi L, Li Q, Wu J, Fu X. Invasive Fusobacterium nucleatum activates beta-catenin signaling in colorectal cancer via a TLR4/P-PAK1 cascade. Oncotarget. 2017;8(19):31802–31814.
20.
Bullman S, Pedamallu CS, Sicinska E, Clancy TE, Zhang X, Cai D, Neuberg D, Huang K, Guevara F, Nelson T, et al. Analysis of Fusobacterium persistence and antibiotic response in colorectal cancer. Science. 2017;358(6369):1443–1448.
21.
Zhang Y, Zhang L, Zheng S, Li M, Xu C, Jia D, Qi Y, Hou T, Wang L, Wang B, et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum promotes colorectal cancer cells adhesion to endothelial cells and facilitates extravasation and metastasis by inducing ALPK1/NF-κB/ICAM1 axis. Gut Microbes. 2022;14(1): Article 2038852.
22.
Chen S, Zhang L, Li M, Zhang Y, Sun M, Wang L. Fusobacterium nucleatum reduces METTL3-mediated m6A modification and contributes to colorectal cancer metastasis. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1): Article 1248.
23.
Galeano Niño JL, Wu H, LaCourse KD, Kempchinsky AG, Baryiames A, Barber B, Futran N, Houlton J, Sather C, Sicinska E, et al. Effect of the intratumoral microbiota on spatial and cellular heterogeneity in cancer. Nature. 2022;611(7937):810–817.
24.
Yu T, Guo F, Yu Y, Sun T, Ma D, Han J, Qian Y, Kryczek I, Sun D, Nagarsheth N, et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum promotes chemoresistance to colorectal cancer by modulating autophagy. Cell. 2017;170(3):548–563.
25.
Wang N, Zhang L, Leng X-X, Xie Y-L, Kang Z-R, Zhao L-C, Song LH, Zhou CB, Fang JY. Fusobacterium nucleatum induces chemoresistance in colorectal cancer by inhibiting pyroptosis via the Hippo pathway. Gut Microbes. 2024;16(1): Article 2333790.
26.
Dong J, Li Y, Xiao H, Zhang S, Wang B, Wang H, Li Y, Fan S, Cui M. Oral microbiota affects the efficacy and prognosis of radiotherapy for colorectal cancer in mouse models. Cell Rep. 2021;37(4): Article 109886.
27.
Chen F, Guo S, Li Y, Lu Y, Liu L, Chen S, An J, Zhang G. Fusobacterium nucleatum-driven CX3CR1+ PD-L1+ phagocytes route to tumor tissues and reshape tumor microenvironment. Gut Microbes. 2025;17(1): Article 2442037.
28.
Jiang S-S, Xie Y-L, Xiao X-Y, Kang Z-R, Lin X-L, Zhang L, Li CS, Qian Y, Xu PP, Leng XX, et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum-derived succinic acid induces tumor resistance to immunotherapy in colorectal cancer. Cell Host Microbe. 2023;31(5):781–797.
29.
Ternes D, Tsenkova M, Pozdeev VI, Meyers M, Koncina E, Atatri S, Schmitz M, Karta J, Schmoetten M, Heinken A, et al. The gut microbial metabolite formate exacerbates colorectal cancer progression. Nat Metab. 2022;4(4):458–475.
30.
Brennan CA, Nakatsu G, Comeau CAG, Drew DA, Glickman JN, Schoen RE. Aspirin modulation of the colorectal cancer-associated microbe Fusobacterium nucleatum. MBio. 2021;12(2): Article e00547.
31.
Yan X, Ma F, Chen Q, Gou X, Li X, Zhang L, Gao H. Construction of size-transformable supramolecular nano-platform against drug-resistant colorectal cancer caused by Fusobacterium nucleatum. Chem Eng J. 2022;450: Article 137605.
32.
Wang M, Rousseau B, Qiu K, Huang G, Zhang Y, Su H, le Bihan-Benjamin C, Khati I, Artz O, Foote MB, et al. Killing tumor-associated bacteria with a liposomal antibiotic generates neoantigens that induce anti-tumor immune responses. Nat Biotechnol. 2024;42(8):1263–1274.
33.
Liu X, Sun M, Pu F, Ren J, Qu XJ. Transforming intratumor bacteria into immunopotentiators to reverse cold tumors for enhanced immuno-chemodynamic therapy of triple-negative breast cancer. J Am Chem Soc. 2023;145(48):26296–26307.
34.
Xie S, Wei L, Liu Y, Meng J, Cao W, Qiu B, Li X. Size-tunable nanogels for cascaded release of metronidazole and chemotherapeutic agents to combat Fusobacterium nucleatum-infected colorectal cancer. J Control Release. 2024;365:16–28.
35.
Jiazhen N, Meihui S, De L, Na L, Youtao X, Qixian C. Remodeling the inflammatory and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment for enhancing antiangiogenic gene therapy of colorectal cancer. Adv Healthc Mater. 2024; Article 2402887.
36.
Qu X, Yin F, Pei M, Chen Q, Zhang Y, Lu S, Zhang X, Liu Z, Li X, Chen H, et al. Modulation of intratumoral Fusobacterium nucleatum to enhance sonodynamic therapy for colorectal cancer with reduced phototoxic skin injury. ACS Nano. 2023;17(12):11466–11480.
37.
Wang X, Chen Q, Zhu Y, Wang K, Chang Y, Wu X, Bao W, Cao T, Chen H, Zhang Y, et al. Destroying pathogen-tumor symbionts synergizing with catalytic therapy of colorectal cancer by biomimetic protein-supported single-atom nanozyme. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1): Article 277.
38.
Yan X, Xin Y, Yu Y, Li X, Li B, Elsabahy M, Zhang J, Ma F, Gao H. Remotely controllable supramolecular nanomedicine for drug-resistant colorectal cancer therapy caused by Fusobacterium nucleatum. Small Methods. 2024;8(3): Article 2301309.
39.
Li J, Song S, Meng J, Tan L, Liu X, Zheng Y. 2D MOF periodontitis photodynamic ion therapy. J Am Chem Soc. 2021;143(37):15427–15439.
40.
Chen J, Zhang P, Zhao Y, Zhao J, Wu X, Zhang R, Cha R, Yao Q, Gao Y. Nitroreductase-instructed supramolecular assemblies for microbiome regulation to enhance colorectal cancer treatments. Sci Adv. 2022;8(45): Article eadd2789.
41.
Wu T, Jin D, Wu M, Xin Y, Liu H, Li N, Ma F, Yu Y, Wang B, Zhao J, et al. Blocking Fusobacterium nucleatum-host cell interactions with responsive supramolecular GalNAc-derived nanoplatform for enhanced chemotherapy in colorectal cancer. Nano Today. 2024;56: Article 102288.
42.
Jia F, Yu Q, Wang R, Zhao L, Yuan F, Guo H, Shen Y, He F. Optimized antimicrobial peptide Jelleine-I derivative Br-JI inhibits Fusobacterium nucleatum to suppress colorectal cancer progression. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(2): Article 1469.
43.
Zheng D-W, Dong X, Pan P, Chen K-W, Fan J-X, Cheng S-X, Zhang XZ. Phage-guided modulation of the gut microbiota of mouse models of colorectal cancer augments their responses to chemotherapy. Nat Biomed Eng. 2019;3(9):717–728.
44.
Dong X, Pan P, Zheng D-W, Bao P, Zeng X, Zhang XZ. Bioinorganic hybrid bacteriophage for modulation of intestinal microbiota to remodel tumor-immune microenvironment against colorectal cancer. Sci Adv. 2020;6(20): Article eaba1590.
45.
Younginger BS, Mayba O, Reeder J, Nagarkar DR, Modrusan Z, Albert ML, Byrd AL. Enrichment of oral-derived bacteria in inflamed colorectal tumors and distinct associations of Fusobacterium in the mesenchymal subtype. Cell Rep Med. 2023;4(2): Article 100920.
46.
Bibek GC, Zhou P, Wu C. Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. animalis comes to the spotlight in oral diseases. Cell Host Microbe. 2024;32(4):443–444.
47.
Zepeda-Rivera M, Minot SS, Bouzek H, Wu H, Blanco-Míguez A, Manghi P. A distinct Fusobacterium nucleatum clade dominates the colorectal cancer niche. Nature. 2024;628(8007):424–432.
48.
Nejman D, Livyatan I, Fuks G, Gavert N, Zwang Y, Geller LT, Rotter-Maskowitz A, Weiser R, Mallel G, Gigi E, et al. The human tumor microbiome is composed of tumor type-specific intracellular bacteria. Science. 2020;368(6494):973–980.
49.
Meng L, Yang F, Pang Y, Cao Z, Wu F, Yan D, Liu J. Nanocapping-enabled charge reversal generates cell-enterable endosomal-escapable bacteriophages for intracellular pathogen inhibition. Sci Adv. 2022;8(28): Article eabq2005.
50.
Bai S, Song J, Pu H, Yu Y, Song W, Chen Z, Wang M, Campbell-Valois FX, Wong WL, Cai Q, et al. Chemical biology approach to reveal the importance of precise subcellular targeting for intracellular Staphylococcus aureus eradication. J Am Chem Soc. 2023;145(42):23372–23384.
51.
Liu P-F, Haake SK, Gallo RL, Huang C-M. A novel vaccine targeting Fusobacterium nucleatum against abscesses and halitosis. Vaccine. 2009;27(10):1589–1595.
52.
Chen L, Zhao R, Shen J, Liu N, Zheng Z, Miao Y. Antibacterial Fusobacterium nucleatum-mimicking nanomedicine to selectively eliminate tumor-colonized bacteria and enhance immunotherapy against colorectal cancer. Adv Mater. 2023;35(45): Article 2306281.
53.
Liu P-F, Huang I-F, Shu C-W, Huang C-M. Halitosis vaccines targeting FomA, a biofilm-bridging protein of Fusobacteria nucleatum. Curr Mol Med. 2013;13(8):1358–1367.
Year 2025 volume 8 Issue 4
PDF
174
94
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.34133/research.0640
  • Receive Date:2025-01-29
  • Online Date:2025-07-23
  • Published:2025-04-09
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-01-29
  • Revised:2025-02-24
  • Accepted:2025-02-25
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China(32422042)
National Natural Science Foundation of China(52203185)
National Natural Science Foundation of China(T2225021)
National Key Research and Development Program of China(2023YFC2307700)
China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(2024M763294)
Affiliations
    1 State Key Laboratory of Biopharmaceutical Preparation and Delivery, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
    2 School of Chemical Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.

Corresponding:

* Address correspondence to: (W.W.); (D.Z.)
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/research/EN/10.34133/research.0640
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT