收藏切换
Soft Artificial Synapse Electronics
收藏切换
PDF
Md. Rayid Hasan Mojumder1, , Seongchan Kim2, , Cunjiang Yu3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, *
Research. Vol 8 Article ID 0582
Less
收藏切换
Research. Vol 8 Article ID 0582
Review Article
Soft Artificial Synapse Electronics
Full
Md. Rayid Hasan Mojumder1, , Seongchan Kim2, , Cunjiang Yu3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, *
Affiliations
  • 1 Department of Electrical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
  • 2 Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
  • 3 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
  • 4 Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
  • 5 Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
  • 6 Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
  • 7 Materials Research Laboratory, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
  • 8 Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
  • 9 Nick Holonyak Micro and Nanotechnology Laboratory, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Published: 2025-01-28 doi: 10.34133/research.0582
Outline
收藏切换

Soft electronics, known for their bendable, stretchable, and flexible properties, are revolutionizing fields such as biomedical sensing, consumer electronics, and robotics. A primary challenge in this domain is achieving low power consumption, often hampered by the limitations of the conventional von Neumann architecture. In response, the development of soft artificial synapses (SASs) has gained substantial attention. These synapses seek to replicate the signal transmission properties of biological synapses, offering an innovative solution to this challenge. This review explores the materials and device architectures integral to SAS fabrication, emphasizing flexibility and stability under mechanical deformation. Various architectures, including floating-gate dielectric, ferroelectric-gate dielectric, and electrolyte-gate dielectric, are analyzed for effective weight control in SASs. The utilization of organic and low-dimensional materials is highlighted, showcasing their plasticity and energy-efficient operation. Furthermore, the paper investigates the integration of functionality into SASs, particularly focusing on devices that autonomously sense external stimuli. Functionalized SASs, capable of recognizing optical, mechanical, chemical, olfactory, and auditory cues, demonstrate promising applications in computing and sensing. A detailed examination of photo-functionalized, tactile-functionalized, and chemoreception-functionalized SASs reveals their potential in image recognition, tactile sensing, and chemosensory applications, respectively. This study highlights that SASs and functionalized SAS devices hold transformative potential for bioelectronics and sensing for soft-robotics applications; however, further research is necessary to address scalability, long-time stability, and utilizing functionalized SASs for prosthetics and in vivo applications through clinical adoption. By providing a comprehensive overview, this paper contributes to the understanding of SASs, bridging research gaps and paving the way toward transformative developments in soft electronics, biomimicking and biointegrated synapse devices, and integrated systems.

Md. Rayid Hasan Mojumder, Seongchan Kim, Cunjiang Yu. Soft Artificial Synapse Electronics[J]. Research, 2025 , 8 (1) : 0582 . DOI: 10.34133/research.0582
Soft electronics represent a transformative class of electronics distinguished by their ability to bend, stretch, and flex while maintaining their functionality. Unlike traditional rigid electronics, soft electronics can conform to irregular surfaces and tolerate external mechanical deformation, revolutionizing the biomedical sensing, consumer electronics, and robotics fields [16]. In the realm of wearable biomedical sensors, a prominent application of soft electronics, there is a substantial advancement in the noninvasive and continuous monitoring of vital signs, including heart rate, blood pressure, chemical compositions, and body temperature. Beyond sensing, soft electronics are integral in prosthetics and tissue engineering, ensuring seamless interfaces with artificial limbs and organs, thus elevating comfort and enhancing functionality [710]. Despite their transformative potential, soft electronics encounter various challenges, with one substantial issue being low power consumption. This is a pivotal factor for their practical application and widespread adoption. The predominant barrier in this regard is the traditional von Neumann architecture, which impedes the realization of high energy efficiency in soft electronics due to its segregation of processing and memory elements [11]. Additionally, the inherent rigidity, limited integration with biosystems, and negative environmental impacts often hold back the use of traditional computing schemes for mimicking bioneural parallel processing with softness. Addressing these limitations necessitates the exploration and implementation of a new architecture in soft electronics.
Addressing the inherent challenges in soft electronics, the development of soft artificial synapses (SASs) has emerged as a promising solution, drawing considerable attention in recent research [1215]. Mimicking the biological synapse, SASs aim to replicate the signal transmission properties of biological systems with low energy consumption [16]. In a biological–neural system, synapses serve as fundamental connections transmitting electrical or chemical signals between neurons and cells [1719]. This process involves the release of neurotransmitters from the presynaptic terminal, traversing the synaptic cleft, and reaching the receptors on the postsynaptic terminal, governed by synaptic weight control mechanisms. The regulation of the charge and potential of the postsynaptic terminal leads to short-term plasticity and long-term plasticity. Short-term plasticity enables rapid neurophysiological computation of vital information in brain networks, whereas long-term plasticity underpins the formation of lasting memories [20].
Just as the biological synapse processes information using synaptic plasticity, SASs modulate the strength of a connection (synaptic weight) between presynaptic and postsynaptic terminals. This modulation is achieved through a pulse-shaped weight control voltage, resulting in the generation of an excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC) or an inhibitory postsynaptic current (PSC) [21]. The duration for which the synaptic weight is retained determines short-term and long-term plasticity [22]. Leveraging these electrical behaviors, SASs have been instrumental in constructing brain-like neural network systems, substantially enhancing information processing capabilities [16,23,24]. Furthermore, the soft nature of SASs enables the preservation of synaptic properties even under mechanical deformation. For instance, Fu et al. [25] demonstrated a SAS with a bending radius of nearly 25 mm, capable of enduring a thousand bending cycles. Lee et al. [26] showed that using fluorinated tetrathiophene–diketopyrrolopyrrole-based polymer nanowires with an ion-gel dielectric could demonstrate a 100% straining limit for over 50 training cycles. These breakthroughs highlight the potential of SASs in creating effective interfaces with artificial limbs and organs, a critical advancement in enhancing comfort and functionality within the realm of soft electronics.
To construct SASs, various device architectures have been explored, including floating-gate dielectric, ferroelectric-gate dielectric, and electrolyte-gate dielectric, as illustrated in Fig. 1. A critical aspect in the fabrication process is the selection of weight control dielectric and semiconductor materials. These materials are chosen for their ability to maintain consistent synaptic properties, even under mechanical strains such as bending or stretching. This consideration ensures the resilience and reliability of SASs in diverse applications.
In recent advancements, substantial emphasis has been placed on the functionalization of SASs. Functionalized SASs are specialized devices capable of directly sensing and responding to specific external stimuli. These stimuli include optical, mechanical, chemical, olfactory, and auditory cues. The primary function of these devices is to regulate synaptic weight in response to the detected stimuli, thus enhancing the sensory capabilities of SASs [2732]. This functionalization has opened the door to high-accuracy sensing applications when SASs are optimally designed. For instance, efficient image perception and recognition have already been achieved with functionalized photonic synapses, where the intensity of ultraviolet (UV) light is used to control synaptic plasticity [33,34]. The successful implementation of these functionalized SASs in such capacities showcases the immense potential of SASs in creating more durable, efficient, and environmentally robust soft electronic devices. Understanding the nuances of SASs and their possible applications is vital in advancing the field of soft electronics, potentially revolutionizing the way that we interact with technology.
This review paper provides an in-depth analysis of the materials and architectures essential for developing SASs for advanced applications in soft electronics. It goes beyond the conventional scope by emphasizing functionalized SASs, which demonstrate capabilities for performing synaptic computation at very low energy (approximately tens of picojoules) in response to diverse external stimuli such as optical illumination, mechanical strain, and chemical particles. This dual capability in computing and direct sensing applications, eliminating the need for a dedicated transducer part, highlights their potential to scale down and reduce the complexity of circuit design. Moreover, functionalized SASs show strong potential for clinical application in nerve interfacing. By providing a comprehensive synthesis of the current state and future directions of SAS research, this paper contributes a seminal perspective to the field, aiming to bridge current research gaps and underpin future transformative developments in flexible and responsive electronic devices.
The selection of materials in the fabrication of SASs is important because it substantially affects the stable operation of artificial synapses under mechanical deformation. The fabrication of SASs using inorganic materials with micrometer-scale thickness exhibits stable behavior to environmental and chemical substances [3542]. However, the inherent inflexibility, brittleness, and rigidity of inorganic materials pose considerable limitations, especially in the context of applications within soft electronics and wearable technologies. In an effort to overcome these material-specific challenges, researchers have shifted their focus toward organic and low-dimensional materials, as shown in Fig. 2. These materials have emerged as promising alternatives due to their inherent soft behavior and convenient manufacturing processes. This shift marks an important stride in the field, as organic and low-dimensional materials open up new avenues for the fabrication of SAS devices. Their adoption not only addresses the limitations posed by inorganic materials but also aligns with the overarching goals of developing more adaptable, resilient, and user-friendly soft electronic devices.
The employment of low-dimensional materials, such as transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers, graphene, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) [43], and black phosphorene [44], plays a pivotal role in enhancing the flexibility of SASs. The ultrathin structure and unique physical properties of these materials contribute to superior flexibility, a key attribute for SAS applications [2,3]. Furthermore, in the pursuit of creating stretchable electronics, organic materials have emerged as a preferred choice. Their stretchability is primarily attributed to the van der Waals bonding between molecules [1]. Conjugated polymers, such as poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT:PSS), polyvinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene (P(VDF-TrFE)), polyvinylidene fluoride-hexafluoropropylene, and organic small molecules, including poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT), pentacene and dinaphtho[2,3-b:2′,3′-f]thieno[3,2-b]thiophene (DNTT), are well investigated for their efficiency and mechanical flexibility in SAS device realization. Furthermore, the dielectrics and semiconductors used in SASs can further be chemically modified to include specific functional groups or composites, paving the way for fabricating functionalized SASs [27,45]. The detailed analysis of organic SASs is prevalent in literature.
The ability to achieve effective weight control in SASs is crucially dependent on the modulation of channel conductance. To facilitate this process, various device architectures have been developed and implemented. The representative architectures for SASs can be classified into floating-gate dielectric-based SASs (FG-SASs), ferroelectric-gate dielectric-based SASs (FeG-SASs), and electrolyte-gate dielectric-based SASs (EG-SASs). When a weight control voltage is applied to each weight control terminal, the dielectric materials endeavor to retain charges in the channel layer, subsequently altering the resistance of the channel and carrier mobility [46]. The enduring nature of the modified state, achieved through the application of electrical pulses or pulse trains, enables SASs to obtain essential synaptic properties such as synaptic plasticity [2022,47]. These features are essential in a variety of architectures, and the use of different architectures has the potential to be suitably applied to simulate complex nervous systems, contributing to the mimicking of the biological nervous system.
The architecture of FG-SASs is defined by the inclusion of a floating-gate layer within the dielectric layer, a design that endows these devices with memory properties [4750]. Table 1 presents a comprehensive summary of FG-SASs. To fabricate the architecture, 3 steps are required: (a) deposition of a tunneling dielectric layer, (b) deposition of a floating-gate layer, and (c) deposition of a dielectric layer to embed the floating-gate layer, enabling nonvolatile memory characteristics by trapping charges in the floating-gate layer. To improve the processability of SAS manufacturing, Kim et al. [51] reported a flexible synaptic transistor with a vacuum-deposited charge-trapping nanosheet floating-gate layer. An Al nanosheet (3 nm), exposed to the ambient air, formed native oxide working as the tunneling dielectric layer (Fig. 3A). The self-formed Al floating-gate architecture acts as a charge-trapping layer and induces synaptic plasticity. The trapped charge layer, being placed between the top weight control terminal and the semiconductor, could effectively shield the vertical electric field from the weight control terminal to the semiconductor. As such, the amount of charge induced in the semiconductor layer is controlled by applying pulse trains to the weight control terminals, as shown in Fig. 3B. This process effectively facilitates synaptic weight change and thus is a promising platform for simplifying the manufacturing process of SASs. Furthermore, the proposed device demonstrates mechanical flexibility, maintaining its functional integrity under moderate stress conditions, which further underscores the viability of FG-SASs in various applications.
Further exploring improving the processability, Ren et al. [47] introduced a novel approach by incorporating a fullerene (C60)/poly(methyl methacrylate) hybrid layer, replacing the conventional deposition of the tunneling dielectric and floating-gate layer as shown in Fig. 3C. In the hybrid layer, trapping sites of fullerene are doped in poly(methyl methacrylate) by a facile solution process, and the polarity of charge trapping could be controlled with a low weight control voltage (<5 V). The electrical properties of the device did not show a substantial change in the cyclic bending measurement (bent with a radius of 10 mm), indicating mechanical stability (Fig. 3D). Furthermore, this low-voltage operation with linear long-term potentiation (LTP)/long-term depression (LTD) is shown in Fig. 3E. Excellent linear weight update, stability of the threshold voltage over repeated cycles of operation, high transconductance, and repetitive ion-concentration-dependent switching properties are important characteristics to be sought after for effective neuromorphic computing (i.e., brain-inspired computing) applications [52]. In 2022, Zheng et al. [53] reported a planar flexible FG-SAS that effectively demonstrated a symmetric weight update with low variation over repeated operation. In addition, the proposed device reported more than 800 conducting states and switching endurance over 100 cycles. Figure 3F provides an illustration of the proposed electrolyte-based FG-SASs with pentacene. Here, the chitosan electrolyte layer with an octadecyl trichlorosilane blocking layer induces charge trapping. The floating-weight control terminal layer can change the energy band substantially and facilitate charge transport via thermal emission or quantum tunneling. As a result, the charge from the channel can migrate to the floating-weight control terminal, and due to the robust blocking nature of the device, these charges stay trapped within it. These trap charges could help provide a nonvolatile or static memory behavior [52,5456]. The proposed device shows a symmetric LTP/LTD behavior (Fig. 3G). In addition, the work shows the capability to perform data analysis by building an artificial neural network (ANN) of input (784 neurons), hidden (100 neurons), and output layers (10 neurons) (Fig. 3H). When a 28 × 28 conductance image is given (inset left) to the proposed neural network model, it can predict the digits with a nearly 87% accuracy. The mapped images of the Modified National Institute of Standards and Technology (MNIST) database handwritten digits from the array show effective recognition of the digits (inset right) after 100 training epochs. The proposed device layout could be effective for futuristic hardware-processed neuromorphic computing. The linear synaptic weight modulation makes it a competent option for next-generation computing units.
FeG-SASs are well-known for delivering nondestructive memory operation [49,57]. In general, ferroelectric materials are used for switching between 2 remnant polarization states for the modulation of synaptic weight [5861]. Commonly used inorganic ferroelectric materials in the literature include BiFeO3, BaTiO3, HfZrO x, Pb(Zr, Ti)O3 (PZT), and Hf0.5Zr0.5O2 [62]. A FeG-SAS was proposed by Li et al. [61] that uses a HfZrO x dielectric layer with a TiN layer and demonstrated an excellent MNIST handwritten digit recognition accuracy and a high linear synaptic behavior under different pulse conditions. However, the inherent inflexibility of the materials and the high-temperature process for achieving higher crystallinity make it difficult to fabricate the SAS on soft substrates. In response to the challenges posed by inorganic materials in FeG-SASs, researchers have shifted focus to organic ferroelectrics, which offer inherent flexibility and can be fabricated at lower temperatures [63]. As a result, flexible organic semiconductor materials combined with organic ferroelectric polymers ensure mechanical flexibility and ferroelectric switching. For instance, devices made of pentacene combined with a P(VDF-TrFE) ferroelectric dielectric exhibit a bending radius as low as 0.05 mm and withstand up to 100,000 bending cycles [64]. An overview of FeG-SAS electronics can be found in Table 2.
In order to apply SASs to various curved surfaces, Jang et al. [64] reported ultrathin (~500-nm-thick) organic FeG-SASs, as shown in Fig. 4A. The proposed FeG-SASs can retain their functionalities even in a freestanding condition, which facilitates their transferability onto diverse substrates of random surfaces and shapes (Fig. 4B). Furthermore, the devices demonstrated remarkable mechanical resilience; they were folded to a bending radius of just 0.05 mm with 0.48% straining and successfully attached to the brain surface, as illustrated in Fig. 4C. To explore the synaptic properties, various weight control voltages are applied to control the amount of polarization in these ferroelectric materials, resulting in the modulation of synaptic weight. Figure 4D shows the PSC behavior under −30 V. A potentiating pulse was applied for 100 and 500 ms. With the increase in the pulse width of the presynaptic pulses, a high PSC was observed. In addition, the authors also showed the relationship between PSC according to the modulation of pulse numbers and widths (Fig. 4E). Moreover, the synaptic property under folded conditions was investigated with varied pulse width and numbers. As shown in Fig. 4F, even at the folded condition, both the LTP and LTD behaviors closely mimic the behavior realized with the pristine, unstrained proposed FeG-SAS architecture. This exceptional folding limit, combined with synaptic retentivity, positions these organic FeG-SASs as a highly competent option for next-generation wearable electronics applications.
In EG-SASs, an electrolyte dielectric layer is used, which can enhance low-voltage operation for logic design and ANN application. Electrochemical and mechanical flexibility are 2 common features usually considered when choosing the correct electrolytic dielectric material. Inorganic materials, such as sodium alginate and lithium silicate oxide, were used as electrolyte-gate architectures [6571]. However, the inherent inflexibility of these materials has somewhat limited their consideration for EG-SAS realization. Organic materials are often a first-door choice for highly stretchable device structures. Commonly used soft organic electrolytic dielectric materials include poly[2-methoxy-5-(20-ethylhexyloxy)-p-phenylene vinylene]/RbAg4I5 [72], PEDOT:PSS [29,73,74], and ion gels [23,25,69,75]. In addition, material combinations, such as composites of P3HT core and polyethylene oxide sheath and cellulose nanopaper with ionic liquid, are reported to show ultralow energy consumption (1.23 fJ), flexibility, and biodegradable operation [76,77]. Integrating highly stretchable semiconductors with flexible electrolytes ensures synaptic weight adjustment with minimal energy input. Table 3 summarizes the common EG-SAS architectures.
The charge transfer in an electrolyte dielectric layer starts with a relatively low weight control voltage. As a result, EG-SASs are crucial for ultralow power synaptic applications [7880]. Shim et al. [32] reported a biaxially stretchable elastomeric synaptic transistor (Fig. 5A) that uses a P3HT/styrene-ethylene-butylene-styrene channel layer with an ion-gel electrolytic dielectric. The device could be stretched up to 30% biaxial strain, twisted, and poked. The EPSC curve for the proposed device with and without strain simultaneously demonstrates both short-term memory and long-term memory characteristics (Fig. 5B). A 5 × 5 array of elastomeric transistors was also illustrated with dynamic programming and erasing capability. As shown in Fig. 5C, applying a pulse train of 60 pulses with a 2-Hz frequency, a 500-ms pulse width, and −4-V presynaptic voltage results in a rise of the EPSC value, which can be encoded as the “program” stage. When a 6-V presynaptic voltage is applied with similar properties, the device demonstrates a depression trend, which was encoded as “erase”. It was observed that the proposed device could be dynamically programmed and erased with 60-pulse trains. The proposed method was then used to demonstrate the memorizing and deleting option for the pixelated letters “L”, “T”, and “M”.
Continuing from the exploration of EG-SASs, the field advances with the introduction of stretchable, rubbery synaptic transistors, marking an important stride in applications like locomotive motion and soft robotics. This innovative approach includes the development of a fully elastomeric synaptic transistor, which integrates P3HT as the semiconductor and PVDF-HFP/[EMIM][TFSI] (PVDF-HFP = poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene); EMIM = 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium; TFSI = bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide) as the electrolytic dielectric over a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) substrate, further enhanced by an external mechanoreceptive triboelectric nanogenerator (TENG) system, as illustrated in Fig. 5D [81]. This system adeptly converts external mechanical stimuli, such as tapping, into electrical presynaptic pulses for the transistor. When the transistor is exposed to pulse trains comprising 20 successive pulses, each 50 ms in duration, at a frequency of 10 Hz and an amplitude of −3 V, it exhibits both short-term and long-term memory capabilities. The proposed device requires energy per synaptic event as low as 1.23 fJ.
Notably, as demonstrated in Fig. 5E, the EPSC values gradually increase with the frequency of tapping on the TENG, set at a 50% duty cycle and 5 Hz. Furthermore, a higher short-term weight ratio (Wn/W 1) leads to a greater degree of bending, indicative of the potential for adaptive memory in robotic applications. The research innovatively integrates synaptic transistors into the realm of soft robotics, leading to the conception of neurologically integrated, adaptive robots. The design incorporates a unidirectional electrical output, achieved by embedding a soft, full-wave bridge rectifier. Strategically positioned mechanoreceptive skins on different sides of the neurorobot enable precise control over its movements. As shown in Fig. 5F, the number of taps on either the left or right skin determines the robot's turning direction and angle, demonstrating a sophisticated level of control. The top skin serves the crucial function of initiating or halting the robot's movement through a system of simple taps.
A novel application of EG-SASs is in the development of a neurological electronic skin, designed for attachment to the human forearm [15]. This skin utilizes synaptic transistor functionalities to communicate with a robotic hand using tactile signals encoded in basic Morse code, as detailed in Fig. 5G. The architecture of this device includes simple mechanoreceptors made of conductive rubber, encased in PDMS, forming part of an artificial synapse. The rubbery nature of the device ensures conformability to human skin and resilience to stretching up to 30%. The mechanoreceptors, when activated, send action pulses to the synaptic transistor. The resultant EPSCs are decoded into Morse code, controlling robotic movements such as left, right, up, and down. Figure 5H illustrates the EPSC responses during a sequence of robotic actions—grasping, holding, and releasing an object. The sequence of grasp, hold, and release, integral to the fully rubbery human–robot interaction demonstration, is detailed in Fig. 5I. This tactile stimulus-based human–robot interaction not only integrates pressure-sensitive rubber with synaptic devices but also represents a substantial advancement in the field of neurological function implementation and neurorobotics. Consequently, the proposed device architecture holds great potential for future research in neurological function implementation and neurorobotics.
The current investigations carried out on the aforementioned 3 broad SAS device architectures implicitly provide some crucial insights into the unique advantages and limitations of specific applications. FG-SASs offer moderate flexibility with bending radii down to 5 mm and enduring up to 1,000 bending cycles [82], can show picojoule energy spent per synaptic operation [83], making them suitable for neuromorphic computing tasks requiring precise synaptic control; however, they lack high stretchability. FeG-SASs exhibit exceptional flexibility, achieving bending radii as low as 0.05 mm with 0.48% strain [64], withstanding up to 100,000 bending cycles [84] and consuming only tens of picojoule per synaptic event [64], which makes them ideal for wearable electronics and neurorobotics that demand devices conform to complex surfaces, although they may have limited stretching strain capacity (up to 1.25%). EG-SASs provide the highest stretchability, accommodating strains up to 60% [85] and maintaining performance over 1,000 cycles at 50% strain [81], and energy per synaptic event as low as 1.23 fJ, rendering them optimal for applications in soft robotics and tactile sensors where substantial mechanical deformation occurs, despite potential challenges in long-term stability and environmental sensitivity. Thus, consideration of the sought-after mechanical and device performance is crucial to properly select the better-suited SAS architecture; FG-SASs meet precision and moderate flexibility, FeG-SASs enable extensive bending flexibility, and EG-SASs provide high stretchability. Based on mechanical softness with low operating energy, SASs provide unique benefits compared to the traditional soft sensing devices used in bioelectronics and soft robotics. Thus, in next-generation soft electronics and bioelectronics, where higher energy consumption and limited mechanical flexibility could restrict the use of traditional soft electronics, SAS devices are expected to play a significant role—providing high mechanical flexibility, low energy operation, and sensing and computing facilities in a single device.
Despite their promising potential, SASs face challenges in the scalability, long-term durability, and performance metrics compared to traditional computing and sensing devices [86]. Addressing these issues requires advancements in direct stimulus applications to gate terminals and the development of novel fabrication methods tailored to SASs. These efforts would simplify device integration, enhance scalability, and enable SASs to large-scale applications, solidifying their role in flexible, low-power electronics. To that end, investigations on skin-inspired soft bioelectronic and self-healing materials further enhance the capability and adaptability of SASs, highlighting their potential to overcome existing limitations and drive innovation in bioelectronics and related fields [87,88].
In functionalized SAS device architecture, there is no requirement for additional sensors or transducing components to receive external stimuli. These functionalized SAS devices can directly process external inputs—mechanical deformation, chemical molecules, or photonic exposure—to their channel or gate layer and control the synaptic plasticity based on the magnitude of the external stimuli. The unique capability stems from integrating appropriate stimulus-receptive material within the SAS material library, which enables functionalized features. In functionalized SASs used for tactile and e-skin applications, ion-gel dielectrics with EMIM–TFSI engineering are prevalent over polyimide, polyethylene terephthalate, or PDMS substrates [23,89,90]. The semiconductor materials are selected from the library of organic materials—PEDOT:PSS [29,91], P3HT film [92], and DPP-DTT [93]. In addition, low-dimensional materials are also getting attention for channel layers due to their inherent mechanical strength to withstand external stress. The use of ZnO nanowires [28], semiconducting single-wall CNTs (SC-SWCNTs) [94], 2-dimensional MoS2 [67], and thin-layer indium tin oxide [68] is well investigated for biohybrid SAS integration into tissues. The following section details the 3 important categories of functionalized SAS devices that use materials from the SAS material library and shows promises to expand the current thinking and prospects of possible futuristic bioelectronics and soft-robotics design.
Photo-functionalized soft artificial synapses (PF-SASs) represent a pioneering development in soft electronics, with the ability to adjust the synaptic weight in response to external light stimuli, eliminating the need for external photodetectors. PF-SASs provide a large bandwidth and a low interconnection energy loss, and are useful for ultrafast signal transmission when attempted for novel ANN architecture [95]. For the fabrication of PF-SASs, Xie et al. [27] introduced SC-SWCNTs modified with CdSe/ZnS quantum dots as the active layer for photonic response (Fig. 6A). The proposed device exhibits ultralow power consumption (15.38 aJ) and can be stretched to 20% without substantially losing its synaptic characteristics under various light (365 nm) pulse widths (Fig. 6B). It was observed that when a UV pulse train (~20 pulses) was applied, the device showed an increased EPSC amplitude. Moreover, the change in the LTP/LTD of the proposed soft synaptic devices at different input pulse numbers under 0% to 80% stretching strain is shown in Fig. 6C.
To enhance processibility, in 2023, Wang et al. [33] reported a CNT-based large-area flexible PF-SAS for image recognition. The roll-to-roll gravure printing technology was used to manufacture a 33 × 34 synaptic transistor array. As shown in Fig. 6D, the device is bendable in nature, and UV light (365 nm) passes through the SC-SWCNTs to obtain the built-in potential in the PVDF-HFP/rhodamine 6G dielectric layer. Figure 6E shows the EPSC characteristics of the proposed device under various frequencies of light pulses. Just as the EPSC of a conventional SAS increases in a higher-frequency presynaptic voltage pulse, the EPSC of the proposed PF-SAS also increases in a high-frequency light pulse. Moreover, based on the synaptic properties, the learning-and-forgetting behavior was obtained by exposing light pulses as a form of the letters “C” and “N” to an 8 × 8 PF-SAS array (Fig. 6F). The device memorized the letters for nearly 6 s and consumed only 0.03 fJ energy/pulse-stimulus, indicating the potential for next-generation SASs.
A tactile-functionalized soft artificial synapse (TF-SAS) represents a novel architecture for sensing external mechanical stimuli, particularly in applications like tactile sensing, artificial skin, and soft limbs. Traditional tactile sensing in SASs often relies on external tactile sensors coupled with spike coding circuits and piezoelectric or triboelectric components to capture mechanical stress or deformation. These components then convert the sensed mechanical input into presynaptic pulses for the synaptic device. However, TF-SASs eliminate the need for these dedicated tactile sensor parts, offering a more compact and efficient solution. Recently, Lee et al. [84] proposed an organic, flexible synaptic transistor to be used as a tactile sensory organ. As shown in Fig. 7A, barium titanate (BT) nanoparticles (NPs) and P(VDF-TrFE) are used as the weight control terminal medium. The proposed device can withstand 10,000 bending cycles with 1.25% applied strain (Fig. 7B) and negligible change in synaptic weight and paired-pulse ratio under applying various strains (Fig. 7C). Furthermore, the work also demonstrated the reception and preprocessing of tactile information mimicking the biological Merkel cell and Merkel cell–neurite complex structure (Fig. 7D). A 2 × 2 TF-SAS array was constructed for the recognition of the number and intensity of mechanical external stimuli being applied. Figure 7E shows the 4 states of dipole generation and charge carrier transfer between the ferroelectric layer and the channel layer in the presence of tactile stimulation. At a fixed weight control terminal voltage (−3 V), the tactile stimuli (~0.3 kPa) alter the hole concentration in the channel due to dipole switching of the ferroelectric layer, and with variation in the amount of time pressure was kept on the weight control terminal, the PSC also changes (Fig. 7F). It was observed that the device can show considerable carrier retentivity even after discarding the tactile stimuli. The relative change in the PSC level with different pressures (left panel of Fig. 7G) and touch duration (right panel of Fig. 7G) showed that higher pressure and duration of touch can result in higher PSC and retentivity. The modulation of synaptic weight can be further controlled by controlling the composition of BT NPs, modulating the ferroelectric dipole switching intensity. With higher BT NPs being considered, the change in synaptic weight increases for both change in pressure (left panel of Fig. 7H) and touch duration (right panel of Fig. 7H). This finding underscores the potential of the device as an intelligent sensor memory for tactile recognition, opening new possibilities for its application in areas such as soft robotics and biocompatible interfaces.
Chemoreception-functionalized soft artificial synapses (CF-SASs) are gaining attention due to their ability to directly interact with biological systems, offering transformative potential for prosthetics and brain–machine interfaces. These interfaces employ advanced computational paradigms where hardware ANNs adapt autonomously through biofeedback. CF-SASs are unique in that they use chemical components, ions, molecules, and particles as input stimuli. Chouhdry et al. [73] emulated the potentiation and inhibition principle of the biological chemical synapse in the glomerulus (Mitral cell) within the olfactory bulb using an electrochemical transistor structure with chemosensory capability. The device uses a PEDOT:PSS channel with an electrolyte-gate dielectric layer, as shown in Fig. 8A. Figure 8B shows the spike-number-dependent plasticity of the proposed device to observe the change in the PSC in the absence of external chemicals. With the increased number of potentiation pulses, the percent change in synaptic weight increased, resulting in long-term memorization capability (Fig. 8C). Furthermore, the ionic liquid group in the electrolyte-gate dielectric layer ([EMIM]+ [TFSI]) acts as a chemoreceptive layer with high carrier-inducing and gas solvent abilities. Figure 8D shows the interaction of molecular gas and electrolyte-gate dielectric, which generates weight control potential for potentiation application. Here, external chemical or gas molecules (NO2) can interact with the cations ([EMIM]+) and make them solvated. Additionally, the proposed chemoreceptive electrolyte-gate dielectric can be de-doped and doped through injection and extraction of the ions from the channel layer. In this case, the presence of NO2 and electrical stimuli (V g) results in potentiation and inhibition of the PSC, respectively. Figure 8E shows the dimerization of NO2 to form N2O4, which initiates the shift of [TFSI] anions into the channel to interact with PEDOT+. This chemical doping-induced change in the PSC is shown in Fig. 8F with 3 different concentrations of NO2. It was reported that a higher concentration of chemical exposure results in higher potential at the weight control terminal, resulting in higher doping levels and LTP. The long-term memorization implemented by the chemical stimulus can be erased by supplying weight control pulses, making the proposed device programmable for wearable and implantable chemosensory applications.
Functionalized SASs offer several key benefits that traditional sensors and devices cannot effectively provide. The reduction of circuity in system design, minimized latency in signal transmission between computing and sensing components, ultralow energy (~15.38 aJ) per synaptic event, flexible device architecture, integration of neuromorphic computing within the sensing components, and potential for low-cost device manufacturing expand the scope of applications for functionalized SASs [27]. Building on these advantages, further research into functionalized SASs could explore a range of promising directions. First, PF-SASs involve expanding the frequency range of light and scaling up the synaptic arrays for autonomous vehicles and robotic vision systems. Additionally, artificial visual-perception systems based on PF-SASs offer promising options for integration into wearable and bioimplantable electronics. Second, for TF-SASs, the use of tribo-piezoelectric soft materials, such as PVDF, ZnO, BaTiO3, thin-film PZT:PDMS, and polyurethane, offers the ability for multimodal sensing that can show benefits in responsive and adaptive soft robotic systems developments, such as intelligent electronic skin in neurorobotics applications. Finally, the implementation of CF-SASs requires soft materials with chemoreceptor compliance for electrochemical sensing and potentiometric applications. Further investigation is necessary on soft materials such as PDMS, aqueous electrolytic dielectric solutions, and PEDOT:PSS ion gels, extending beyond olfactory and gustatory systems to electrochemical applications related to the human body and environmental sensing.
For clinical applications, such as neuroprosthetics and biomedical device design, functionalized SASs need to demonstrate biocompatible, miniaturized, scalable, and reliable competency. Materials like PEDOT:PSS and chitosan have shown promise due to their biocompatibility [96]. However, most organic semiconductors may degrade in vivo, leading to loss of functionality or adverse biological reactions [97]. An advanced encapsulation technique can be an option to protect the device from bodily fluids, but this still needs to be further investigated for potential application challenges [98100]. Furthermore, the continuous interpretation of neural signals for practical interfacing with the human nervous system requires precise control, device integrity [101], and clear metrics to undergo rigorous testing and approval processes to ensure the host's safety, data privacy, and long-term effects [102]. Table 4 shows important performance parameters for considering functionalized SAS devices for clinical applications. The challenges related to this unique clinical adoption involve searching for biocompatible polymers, composites, and bioinspired materials like conductive hydrogels [103]. Integrating fabrication techniques like 3-dimensional printing, nanolithography, and molecular self-assembly during the device fabrication process can help properly control the device size and scalability needs. Collaboration among multidisciplinary professionals is a prime need for in vivo testing and the iterative device improvement process, as well as for properly setting the metrics for embedding SASs and functionalized SASs into the human body.
To date, the functionalized SAS device technology is not mature for clinical practices. Some practical limitations, challenges, and trade-offs are crucial to understand the future implementation and integration into clinical aspects of these technologies. The soft or flexible nature of synaptic devices mostly comes from the organic materials being used; however, these materials could degrade over time and under harsh environmental conditions [104]. In addition, the in-memory sensing option offered by functionalized SASs needs careful attention, as the current literature lacks an in-depth investigation of the device's performance in the presence of noise with or without strain. Moreover, future investigations in functionalized SASs require signal processing units and interfacing circuits and protocols, especially for wearable electronics and biosensing [105]. Finally, for wearable and implantable applications, proper material characterization is necessary to ensure the biocompatibility and nontoxicity of the material over the short and the long term [106]. Current techniques, such as encapsulation methods, require further refinement and specialized focus to effectively support SAS device operation.
In the past decade, the realm of SASs has emerged as a field of profound interest, driven by its potential to revolutionize robotics, biosensing, and neuroprosthetics. Two critical attributes required for these SAS applications include consistent, flexible synaptic operation controllable through external stimuli and low energy consumption during operation. The choice of device materials is pivotal for achieving flexibility, while energy efficiency demands a multimodal approach to input stimuli. The functionalization of materials and device architectures is becoming increasingly crucial in facilitating both aspects of SAS operation.
This investigation provides a comprehensive overview of materials and device architectures for realizing SASs and functionalized SASs. Initially, it highlights the distinctive attributes of SASs in soft electronics, emphasizing their capacity to flex, bend, stretch, and adapt to uneven surfaces without compromising operational integrity. SASs primarily consist of organics, polymers, and nanomaterials, imparting the necessary softness to emulate biological systems. A shift in material choice from rigid inorganic materials to inherently flexible organic and low-dimensional materials for SAS realization is discussed. The research further elaborates on the operation of 3 well-known synaptic weight control mechanisms, floating-gate dielectric, ferroelectric-gate dielectric, and electrolyte-gate dielectric, along with their applications in neuromorphic image perception, tactile recognition, and dynamic programming. Subsequently, the operational mechanism of functionalized SASs, their device structure, and weight control mechanisms are explored. In functionalized SASs, weight control stimuli are directly integrated into the device, eliminating the need for external sensing devices like TENG or sensors. This results in enhanced multimodal sensing capabilities and improved energy efficiency. The functionalized operation with photonic, mechanical, and chemical stimuli is highlighted, offering prospects for future research and applications. Nevertheless, the research scope for other stimulus-based functionalized SASs remains limited and requires further investigation and development.
Applications of SAS necessitate nontoxic, flexible, energy-efficient, biodegradable, and biocompatible materials. The achievement of biofriendly flexible SASs holds the potential to revolutionize the biomedical and neuroelectronic fields, offering the promise of in vivo synaptic logic circuit implementation. Additionally, the susceptibility of SAS materials to environmental factors like heat and moisture raises questions about device reliability. These challenges underscore the importance of ongoing research and development to enhance the robustness, efficiency, and environmental resilience of SASs. This trajectory not only promises technological advancements but also envisions a symbiotic relationship between electronics and biological systems, fostering user-friendly, environmentally friendly, and human-centered electronic solutions.
  • National Science Foundation(2227062)
  • Office of Naval Research(N00014-21-1-2480)
  • Office of Naval Research(N00014-18-1-2338)
1.
Wang C, Wang C, Huang Z, Xu S. Materials and structures toward soft electronics. Adv Mater. 2018;30(30): Article 1801368.
2.
Kang J, Tok JBH, Bao Z. Self-healing soft electronics. Nat Electron. 2019;2:144–150.
3.
Choi C, Choi MK, Hyeon T, Kim D-H. Nanomaterial-based soft electronics for healthcare applications. ChemNanoMat. 2016;2(11):1006–1017.
4.
Llerena Zambrano B, Renz AF, Ruff T, Lienemann S, Tybrandt K, Vörös J, Lee J. Soft electronics based on stretchable and conductive nanocomposites for biomedical applications. Adv Healthc Mater. 2021;10(3): Article 2001397.
5.
Rich SI, Wood RJ, Majidi C. Untethered soft robotics. Nat Electron. 2018;1:102–112.
6.
Zaia EW, Gordon MP, Yuan P, Urban JJ. Progress and perspective: Soft thermoelectric materials for wearable and Internet-of-Things applications. Adv Electron Mater. 2019;5(11): Article 1800823.
7.
Powell SK, Cruz RLJ, Ross MT, Woodruff MA. Past, present, and future of soft-tissue prosthetics: Advanced polymers and advanced manufacturing. Adv Mater. 2020;32(42): Article 2001122.
8.
Chortos A, Liu J, Bao Z. Pursuing prosthetic electronic skin. Nat Mater. 2016;15(9):937–950.
9.
Heng W, Solomon S, Gao W. Flexible electronics and devices as human–machine interfaces for medical robotics. Adv Mater. 2022;34(16): Article 2107902.
10.
Lee JH, Kim H, Kim JH, Lee S-H. Soft implantable microelectrodes for future medicine: Prosthetics, neural signal recording and neuromodulation. Lab Chip. 2016;16(6):959–976.
11.
Gao M, Wang P, Jiang L, Wang B, Yao Y, Liu S, Chu D, Cheng W, Lu Y. Power generation for wearable systems. Energy Environ Sci. 2021;14:2114–2157.
12.
Zhang Y, Liu L, Tu B, Cui B, Guo J, Zhao X, Wang J, Yan Y. An artificial synapse based on molecular junctions. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1): Article 247.
13.
Guo T, Ge J, Sun B, Pan K, Pan Z, Wei L, Yan Y, Zhou YN, Wu YA. Soft biomaterials based flexible artificial synapse for neuromorphic computing. Adv Electron Mater. 2022;8(10): Article 2200449.
14.
Park H-L, Lee Y, Kim N, Seo DG, Go GT, Lee TW. Flexible neuromorphic electronics for computing, soft robotics, and neuroprosthetics. Adv Mater. 2020;32(15): Article 1903558.
15.
Shim H, Jang S, Jang JG, Rao Z, Hong JI, Sim K, Yu C. Fully rubbery synaptic transistors made out of all-organic materials for elastic neurological electronic skin. Nano Res. 2022;15:758–764.
16.
Shim H, Ershad F, Patel S, Zhang Y, Wang B, Chen Z, Marks TJ, Facchetti A, Yu C. An elastic and reconfigurable synaptic transistor based on a stretchable bilayer semiconductor. Nat Electron. 2022;5:660–671.
17.
Sun F, Lu Q, Liu L, Li L, Wang Y, Hao M, Cao Z, Wang Z, Wang S, Li T, et al. Bioinspired flexible, dual-modulation synaptic transistors toward artificial visual memory systems. Adv Mater Technol. 2020;5(1): Article 1900888.
18.
Dai S, Zhao Y, Wang Y, Zhang J, Fang L, Jin S, Shao Y, Huang J. Recent advances in transistor-based artificial synapses. Adv Funct Mater. 2019;29(42): Article 1903700.
19.
Ho VM, Lee J-A, Martin KC. The cell biology of synaptic plasticity. Science. 2011;334(6056):623–628.
20.
Zucker RS, Regehr WG. Short-term synaptic plasticity. Annu Rev Physiol. 2002;64:355–405.
21.
Caporale N, Dan Y. Spike timing–dependent plasticity: A Hebbian learning rule. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2008;31:25–46.
22.
Citri A, Malenka RC. Synaptic plasticity: Multiple forms, functions, and mechanisms. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008;33(1):18–41.
23.
Shao L, Luo S, Wang Z, Xu X, Yan Y, Wu Y, Guo M, Wei D, Zhao Y, Liu Y. A flexible biohybrid reflex arc mimicking neurotransmitter transmission. Cell Rep Phys Sci. 2022;3(7): Article 100962.
24.
Zhou B, Liu W, Xu Y, Jin C, Yang J, Sun J. Organic electrochemical transistors toward synaptic electronics. J Phys D Appl Phys. 2022;55(30): Article 304006.
25.
Fu Y, Kong LA, Chen Y, Wang J, Qian C, Yuan Y, Sun J, Gao Y, Wan Q. Flexible neuromorphic architectures based on self-supported multiterminal organic transistors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(31):26443–26450.
26.
Lee Y, Oh JY, Xu W, Kim O, Kim TR, Kang J, Kim Y, Son D, Tok JBH, Park MJ, et al. Stretchable organic optoelectronic sensorimotor synapse. Sci Adv. 2018;4(11): Article eaat7387.
27.
Xie T, Wang Q, Li M, Fang Y, Li G, Shao S, Yu W, Wang S, Gu W, Zhao C, et al. Carbon nanotube optoelectronic synapse transistor Arrays with ultra-low power consumption for stretchable neuromorphic vision systems. Adv Funct Mater. 2023;33(37): Article 2303970.
28.
Liu F, Deswal S, Christou A, Shojaei Baghini M, Chirila R, Shakthivel D, Chakraborty M, Dahiya R. Printed synaptic transistor–based electronic skin for robots to feel and learn. Sci Robot. 2022;7(67): Article eabl7286.
29.
Qiu J, Cao J, Liu X, Chen P, Feng G, Zhang X, Wang M, Liu Q. A flexible organic electrochemical synaptic transistor with dopamine-mediated plasticity. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2023;44(1):176–179.
30.
Li M, Deng J, Wang X, Shao S, Li X, Gu W, Wang H, Zhao J. Flexible printed single-walled carbon nanotubes olfactory synaptic transistors with crosslinked poly(4-vinylphenol) as dielectrics. Flex Print Electron. 2021;6(3): Article 034001.
31.
Liu Y, Li E, Wang X, Chen Q, Zhou Y, Hu Y, Chen G, Chen H, Guo T. Self-powered artificial auditory pathway for intelligent neuromorphic computing and sound detection. Nano Energy. 2020;78: Article 105403.
32.
Shim H, Jang S, Thukral A, Jeong S, Jo H, Kan B, Patel S, Wei G, Lan W, Kim HJ, et al. Artificial neuromorphic cognitive skins based on distributed biaxially stretchable elastomeric synaptic transistors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2022;119(23): Article e2204852119.
33.
Wang S, Wang Q, Li M, Fang Y, Shao S, Xie T, Zhao C, Liang L, Zhao J. Roll-to-roll gravure printed large-area flexible carbon nanotube synaptic photogating transistor arrays for image recognitions. Nano Energy. 2023;115: Article 108698.
34.
Zhu Q-B, Li B, Yang DD, Liu C, Feng S, Chen ML, Sun Y, Tian YN, Su X, Wang XM, et al. A flexible ultrasensitive optoelectronic sensor array for neuromorphic vision systems. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1): Article 1798.
35.
Chen J-H, Jang C, Xiao S, Ishigami M, Fuhrer MS. Intrinsic and extrinsic performance limits of graphene devices on SiO2. Nat Nanotechnol. 2008;3(4):206–209.
36.
Ronen RS, Robinson PH. Recent advances in thin-film silicon devices on sapphire substrates. Proc IEEE. 1971;59(10):1506–1510.
37.
McAlpine MC, Friedman RS, Jin S, Lin KH, Wang WU, Lieber CM. High-performance nanowire electronics and photonics on glass and plastic substrates. Nano Lett. 2003;3(11):1531–1535.
38.
Hu F, Xie Z-P, Zhang J, Hu Z-L, An D. Promising high-thermal-conductivity substrate material for high-power electronic device: Silicon nitride ceramics. Rare Metals. 2020;39:463–478.
39.
Sohn Y-I, Miller R, Venkataraman V, Lončar M. Mechanical and optical nanodevices in single-crystal quartz. Appl Phys Lett. 2017;111: Article 263103.
40.
Müller SG, Glass RC, Hobgood HM, Tsvetkov VF, Brady M, Henshall D, Malta D, Singh R, Palmour J, Carter CH Jr. Progress in the industrial production of SiC substrates for semiconductor devices. Mater Sci Eng B. 2001;80(1–3):327–331.
41.
Jiang X, Wong FL, Fung MK, Lee ST. Aluminum-doped zinc oxide films as transparent conductive electrode for organic light-emitting devices. Appl Phys Lett. 2003;83:1875–1877.
42.
Pal S, Jacob C. Silicon—A new substrate for GaN growth. Bull Mater Sci. 2004;27:501–504.
43.
Kim S, Yoon J, Kim H-D, Choi S-J. Carbon nanotube synaptic transistor network for pattern recognition. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7(45):25479–25486.
44.
Cao G, Meng P, Chen J, Liu H, Bian R, Zhu C, Liu F, Liu Z. 2D material based synaptic devices for neuromorphic computing. Adv Funct Mater. 2021;31(4): Article 2005443.
45.
Sun J, Liu Y, Yin Z, Zheng Q. High-performance flexible photonic synapse transistors based on a bulk composite film of organic semiconductors with complementary absorption. Acta Chim Sin. 2022;80(7):936–945.
46.
Yang K, Yuan S, Huan Y, Wang J, Tu L, Xu J, Zou Z, Zhan Y, Zheng L, Seoane F. Tunable flexible artificial synapses: A new path toward a wearable electronic system. npj Flex Electron. 2018;2: Article 20.
47.
Ren Y, Yang JQ, Zhou L, Mao JY, Zhang SR, Zhou Y, Han ST. Gate-tunable synaptic plasticity through controlled polarity of charge trapping in fullerene composites. Adv Funct Mater. 2018;28(50): Article 1805599.
48.
Lee S, Seong H, Im SG, Moon H, Yoo S. Organic flash memory on various flexible substrates for foldable and disposable electronics. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1): Article 725.
49.
Jung S-W, Choi JS, Koo JB, Park CW, Na BS, Oh JY, Lim SC, Lee SS, Chu HY, Yoon SM. Flexible nonvolatile organic ferroelectric memory transistors fabricated on polydimethylsiloxane elastomer. Org Electron. 2015;16:46–53.
50.
Wei H, Ni Y, Sun L, Yu H, Gong J, du Y, Ma M, Han H, Xu W. Flexible electro-optical neuromorphic transistors with tunable synaptic plasticity and nociceptive behavior. Nano Energy. 2021;81: Article 105648.
51.
Kim C-H, Sung S, Yoon M-H. Synaptic organic transistors with a vacuum-deposited charge-trapping nanosheet. Sci Rep. 2016;6: Article 33355.
52.
Kim S, Choi B, Lim M, Yoon J, Lee J, Kim HD, Choi SJ. Pattern recognition using carbon nanotube synaptic transistors with an adjustable weight update protocol. ACS Nano. 2017;11(3):2814–2822.
53
Zheng C, Liao Y, Wang J, Zhou Y, Han S-T. Flexible floating-gate electric-double-layer organic transistor for neuromorphic computing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2022;14(51):57102–57112.
54.
Alibart F, Pleutin S, Guérin D, Novembre C, Lenfant S, Lmimouni K, Gamrat C, Vuillaume D. An organic nanoparticle transistor behaving as a biological spiking synapse. Adv Funct Mater. 2010;20(2):330–337.
55.
Hu D, Wang X, Chen H, Guo T. High performance flexible nonvolatile memory based on vertical organic thin film transistor. Adv Funct Mater. 2017;27(41): Article 1703541.
56.
Vu QA, Kim H, Nguyen VL, Won UY, Adhikari S, Kim K, Lee YH, Yu WJ. A high-on/off-ratio floating-gate memristor array on a flexible substrate via CVD-grown large-area 2D layer stacking. Adv Mater. 2017;29(44): Article 1703363.
57.
Kim KL, Lee W, Hwang SK, Joo SH, Cho SM, Song G, Cho SH, Jeong B, Hwang I, Ahn JH, et al. Epitaxial growth of thin ferroelectric polymer films on graphene layer for fully transparent and flexible nonvolatile memory. Nano Lett. 2016;16(1):334–340.
58.
Narayanan Unni KN, de Bettignies R, Dabos-Seignon S, Nunzi J-M. A nonvolatile memory element based on an organic field-effect transistor. Appl Phys Lett. 2004;85:1823–1825.
59.
Wang C, Li Y, Wang Y, Xu X, Fu M, Liu Y, Lin Z, Ling H, Gkoupidenis P, Yi M, et al. Thin-film transistors for emerging neuromorphic electronics: Fundamentals, materials, and pattern recognition. J Mater Chem C. 2021;9:11464–11483.
60.
Seo M, Kang MH, Jeon SB, Bae H, Hur J, Jang BC, Yun S, Cho S, Kim WK, Kim MS, et al. First demonstration of a logic-process compatible junctionless ferroelectric FinFET synapse for neuromorphic applications. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2018;39(9):1445–1448.
61.
Li E, Wu X, Chen Q, Wu S, He L, Yu R, Hu Y, Chen H, Guo T. Nanoscale channel organic ferroelectric synaptic transistor array for high recognition accuracy neuromorphic computing. Nano Energy. 2021;85: Article 106010.
62.
Khan AI, Keshavarzi A, Datta S. The future of ferroelectric field-effect transistor technology. Nat Electron. 2020;3:588–597.
63.
Jia X, Guo R, Tay BK, Yan X. Flexible ferroelectric devices: Status and applications. Adv Funct Mater. 2022;32(45): Article 2205933.
64.
Jang S, Jang S, Lee EH, Kang M, Wang G, Kim TW. Ultrathin conformable organic artificial synapse for wearable intelligent device applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(1):1071–1080.
65.
Li J, Fu WH, Li LK, Jiang DL, He LC, Zhu WQ, Zhang JH. Recent advances in solid electrolytes for synaptic transistors. Org Electron. 2021;95: Article 106196.
66.
Jiang C, Liu J, Ni Y, Qu S, Liu L, Li Y, Yang L, Xu W. Mammalian-brain-inspired neuromorphic motion-cognition nerve achieves cross-modal perceptual enhancement. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1): Article 1344.
67.
Hwang Y, Park B, Hwang S, Choi SW, Kim HS, Kim AR, Choi JW, Yoon J, Kwon JD, Kim Y. A bioinspired ultra flexible artificial van der Waals 2D-MoS2 channel/LiSiO x solid electrolyte synapse arrays via laser-lift off process for wearable adaptive neuromorphic computing. Small Methods. 2023;7(7): Article 2201719.
68.
Zhou J, Wan C, Zhu L, Shi Y, Wan Q. Synaptic behaviors mimicked in flexible oxide-based transistors on plastic substrates. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2013;34(11):1433–1435.
69.
Oh S, Cho JI, Lee BH, Seo S, Lee JH, Choo H, Heo K, Lee SY, Park JH. Flexible artificial Si-In-Zn-O/ion gel synapse and its application to sensory-neuromorphic system for sign language translation. Sci Adv. 2021;7(44): Article eabg9450.
70.
Li L, Shao Y, Wang X, Wu X, Liu WJ, Zhang DW, Ding SJ. Flexible femtojoule energy-consumption In-Ga-Zn-O synaptic transistors with extensively tunable memory time. IEEE Trans Electron Dev. 2020;67(1):105–112.
71.
Park S, Jang JT, Hwang Y, Lee H, Choi WS, Kang D, Kim C, Kim H, Kim DH. Effect of the gate dielectric layer of flexible InGaZnO synaptic thin-film transistors on learning behavior. ACS Appl Electron Mater. 2021;3(9):3972–3979.
72.
Lee H, Won Y, Oh JH. Neuromorphic bioelectronics based on semiconducting polymers. J Polym Sci. 2022;60(3):348–376.
73.
Chouhdry HH, Lee DH, Bag A, Lee N-E. A flexible artificial chemosensory neuronal synapse based on chemoreceptive ionogel-gated electrochemical transistor. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1): Article 821.
74.
Nguyen TD, Trung TQ, Lee Y, Lee N-E. Stretchable and stable electrolyte-gated organic electrochemical transistor synapse with a Nafion membrane for enhanced synaptic properties. Adv Eng Mater. 2022;24(4): Article 2100918.
75.
Wan H, Zhao J, Lo LW, Cao Y, Sepúlveda N, Wang C. Multimodal artificial neurological sensory–memory system based on flexible carbon nanotube synaptic transistor. ACS Nano. 2021;15(9):14587–14597.
76.
Xu W, Min S-Y, Hwang H, Lee T-W. Organic core-sheath nanowire artificial synapses with femtojoule energy consumption. Sci Adv. 2016;2(6): Article e1501326.
77.
Zhang J, Liu D, Shi Q, Yang B, Guo P, Fang L, Dai S, Xiong L, Huang J. Bioinspired organic optoelectronic synaptic transistors based on cellulose nanopaper and natural chlorophyll-a for neuromorphic systems. npj Flex Electron. 2022;6: Article 30.
78.
Wang X, Li E, Liu Y, Lan S, Yang H, Yan Y, Shan L, Lin Z, Chen H, Guo T. Stretchable vertical organic transistors and their applications in neurologically systems. Nano Energy. 2021;90: Article 106497.
79.
Xu W, Wang J, Cheng S, Xu X. Flexible organic transistors for neural activity recording. Appl Phys Rev. 2022;9: Article 031308.
80.
Peng Y, Gao L, Liu C, Deng J, Xie M, Bai L, Wang G, Cheng Y, Huang W, Yu J. Stretchable organic electrochemical transistors via three-dimensional porous elastic semiconducting films for artificial synaptic applications. Nano Res. 2023;16:10206–10214.
81.
Shim H, Sim K, Ershad F, Yang P, Thukral A, Rao Z, Kim HJ, Liu Y, Wang X, Gu G, et al. Stretchable elastic synaptic transistors for neurologically integrated soft engineering systems. Sci Adv. 2019;5(10): Article eaax4961.
82.
Meng J-L, Wang TY, Chen L, Sun QQ, Zhu H, Ji L, Ding SJ, Bao WZ, Zhou P, Zhang DW. Energy-efficient flexible photoelectric device with 2D/0D hybrid structure for bio-inspired artificial heterosynapse application. Nano Energy. 2021;83: Article 105815.
83.
Xiong X, Wang X, Hu Q, Li X, Wu Y. Flexible synaptic floating gate devices with dual electrical modulation based on ambipolar black phosphorus. iScience. 2022;25(3): Article 103947.
84.
Lee YR, Trung TQ, Hwang B-U, Lee N-E. A flexible artificial intrinsic-synaptic tactile sensory organ. Nat Commun. 2020;11: Article 2753.
85.
Wang X, Yan Y, Li E, Liu Y, Lai D, Lin Z, Liu Y, Chen H, Guo T. Stretchable synaptic transistors with tunable synaptic behavior. Nano Energy. 2020;75: Article 104952.
86.
Liu K, Ouyang B, Guo X, Guo Y, Liu Y. Advances in flexible organic field-effect transistors and their applications for flexible electronics. npj Flex Electron. 2022;6: Article 1.
87.
Zhao C, Park J, Root SE, Bao Z. Skin-inspired soft bioelectronic materials, devices and systems. Nat Rev Bioeng. 2024;2:671–690.
88.
Qi M, Yang R, Wang Z, Liu Y, Zhang Q, He B, Li K, Yang Q, Wei L, Pan C, et al. Bioinspired self-healing soft electronics. Adv Funct Mater. 2023;33(17): Article 2214479.
89.
Zeng J, Zhao J, Bu T, Liu G, Qi Y, Zhou H, Dong S, Zhang C. A flexible tribotronic artificial synapse with bioinspired neurosensory behavior. Nanomicro Lett. 2022;15: Article 18.
90.
Wang X, Lu W, Wei P, Qin Z, Qiao N, Qin X, Zhang M, Zhu Y, Bu L, Lu G. Artificial tactile recognition enabled by flexible low-voltage organic transistors and low-power synaptic electronics. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2022;14(43):48948–48959.
91.
Wu M, Zhuang Q, Yao K, Li J, Zhao G, Zhou J, Li D, Shi R, Xu G, Li Y, et al. Stretchable, skin-conformable neuromorphic system for tactile sensory recognizing and encoding. InfoMat. 2023;5(12): Article e12472.
92.
Xu Y, Zhang G, Liu W, Jin C, Nie Y, Sun J, Yang J. Flexible multiterminal photoelectronic neurotransistors based on self-assembled rubber semiconductors for spatiotemporal information processing. SmartMat. 2023;4(2): Article e1162.
93.
Qin X, Lu W, Wang X, Qin Z, Chen H, Lu G, Lu G, Bu L. Surface-modified polydimethylsiloxane with soft-plasma as dielectric layer for flexible artificial synaptic transistors. Appl Surf Sci. 2023;627: Article 157325.
94.
Wang Y, Liu D, Zhang Y, Fan L, Ren Q, Ma S, Zhang M. Stretchable temperature-responsive multimodal neuromorphic electronic skin with spontaneous synaptic plasticity recovery. ACS Nano. 2022;16(5):8283–8293.
95.
Pan X, Jin T, Gao J, Han C, Shi Y, Chen W. Stimuli-enabled artificial synapses for neuromorphic perception: Progress and perspectives. Small. 2020;16(34): Article 2001504.
96.
Rivnay J, Wang H, Fenno L, Deisseroth K, Malliaras GG. Next-generation probes, particles, and proteins for neural interfacing. Sci Adv. 2017;3(6): Article e1601649.
97.
Song E, Li J, Won SM, Bai W, Rogers JA. Materials for flexible bioelectronic systems as chronic neural interfaces. Nat Mater. 2020;19(6):590–603.
98.
Someya T, Bao Z, Malliaras GG. The rise of plastic bioelectronics. Nature. 2016;540(7633):379–385.
99.
Sang M, Kim K, Shin J, Yu KJ. Ultra-thin flexible encapsulating materials for soft bio-integrated electronics. Adv Sci. 2022;9(30): Article 2202980.
100.
Mariello M, Kim K, Wu K, Lacour SP, Leterrier Y. Recent advances in encapsulation of flexible bioelectronic implants: Materials, technologies, and characterization methods. Adv Mater. 2022;34(34): Article 2201129.
101.
Feig VR, Tran H, Lee M, Bao Z. Mechanically tunable conductive interpenetrating network hydrogels that mimic the elastic moduli of biological tissue. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1): Article 2740.
102.
Liu S, Zeng J, Wu Z, Hu H, Xu A, Huang X, Chen W, Chen Q, Yu Z, Zhao Y, et al. An ultrasmall organic synapse for neuromorphic computing. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1): Article 7655.
103.
Fu F, Wang J, Zeng H, Yu J. Functional conductive hydrogels for bioelectronics. ACS Mater Lett. 2020;2(10):1287–1301.
104.
Sirringhaus H. Reliability of organic field-effect transistors. Adv Mater. 2009;21(38–39):3859–3873.
105.
Xu M, Obodo D, Yadavalli VK. The design, fabrication, and applications of flexible biosensing devices. Biosens Bioelectron. 2019;124–125:96–114.
106.
Jeong J-W, Yeo WH, Akhtar A, Norton JJS, Kwack YJ, Li S, Jung SY, Su Y, Lee W, Xia J, et al. Materials and optimized designs for human-machine interfaces via epidermal electronics. Adv Mater. 2013;25(47):6839–6846.
107.
Qu T-Y, Sun Y, Chen ML, Liu ZB, Zhu QB, Wang BW, Zhao TY, Liu C, Tan J, Qiu S, et al. A flexible carbon nanotube sen-memory device. Adv Mater. 2020;32(9): Article 1907288.
108.
Wang T-Y, Meng JL, He ZY, Chen L, Zhu H, Sun QQ, Ding SJ, Zhou P, Zhang DW. Ultralow power wearable heterosynapse with photoelectric synergistic modulation. Adv Sci. 2020;7(8): Article 1903480.
109.
Wang H, Zhao Q, Ni Z, Li Q, Liu H, Yang Y, Wang L, Ran Y, Guo Y, Hu W, et al. A ferroelectric/electrochemical modulated organic synapse for ultraflexible artificial visual-perception system. Adv Mater. 2018;30(46): Article 1803961.
110.
Huang X, Liu Y, Liu G, Liu K, Wei X, Zhu M, Wen W, Zhao Z, Guo Y, Liu Y. Short-wave infrared synaptic phototransistor with ambient light adaptability for flexible artificial night visual system. Adv Funct Mater. 2023;33(1): Article 2208836.
111.
Ke S, He Y, Zhu L, Jiang Z, Mao H, Zhu Y, Wan C, Wan Q. Indium-gallium-zinc-oxide based photoelectric neuromorphic transistors for modulable photoexcited corneal nociceptor emulation. Adv Electron Mater. 2021;7(11): Article 2100487.
Year 2025 volume 8 Issue 1
PDF
212
118
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.34133/research.0582
  • Receive Date:2024-10-22
  • Online Date:2025-07-23
  • Published:2025-01-28
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2024-10-22
  • Revised:2024-12-07
  • Accepted:2024-12-22
Funding
National Science Foundation(2227062)
Office of Naval Research(N00014-21-1-2480)
Office of Naval Research(N00014-18-1-2338)
Affiliations
    1 Department of Electrical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
    2 Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
    3 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
    4 Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
    5 Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
    6 Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
    7 Materials Research Laboratory, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
    8 Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
    9 Nick Holonyak Micro and Nanotechnology Laboratory, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.

Corresponding:

* Address correspondence to:
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/research/EN/10.34133/research.0582
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT