Home Journals Articles Updates About
CN
image
收藏切换
Engineered Inner Ear Drug Delivery Systems for Hearing Loss Treatment
收藏切换
PDF
Zhiyan Xuan1, Xiayidan Maimaitikelimu1, Jie Zhan1, Minli Li2, *, Jingjing Gan3, *, Huan Wang1, *
Research. Vol 9 Article ID 1396
Less
收藏切换
Research. Vol 9 Article ID 1396
• REVIEW ARTICLE •
Engineered Inner Ear Drug Delivery Systems for Hearing Loss Treatment
Full
Zhiyan Xuan1, Xiayidan Maimaitikelimu1, Jie Zhan1, Minli Li2, *, Jingjing Gan3, *, Huan Wang1, *
Affiliations
  • 1Biological Laboratory of Hetao Cooperation Zone, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518033, China.
  • 2School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China.
  • 3Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China.
Published: 2026-08-20 doi: 10.34133/research.1396
Outline
收藏切换

Hearing loss is becoming a common disease worldwide, affecting individuals across all age groups, from infants to older adults. However, the unique anatomical barriers of the inner ear limit the effectiveness of conventional systemic therapies, highlighting the need for advanced drug delivery strategies. Engineered inner ear drug delivery systems have emerged as promising approaches for improving drug targeting, retention, and therapeutic efficacy. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the advances by integrating 3 major aspects: major administration routes, diverse therapeutic agents, and delivery carriers employed in inner ear treatment. We first introduce systemic administration, trans-tympanic drug delivery, intracochlear drug delivery, and cochlear implantation (CI). We then summarize anti-inflammatory drugs and antioxidants for the treatment of inner ear disorders. Subsequently, we discuss multiple nanocarriers, viral vectors, injectable hydrogels, and other innovative carriers used in inner ear drug delivery, highlighting their design principles and therapeutic applications. We also illustrate recent progress in clinical trials and discuss the difficulties associated with translating experimental systems into clinical applications. Finally, we outline current limitations and future opportunities, together with potential strategies to address these challenges.

Zhiyan Xuan, Xiayidan Maimaitikelimu, Jie Zhan, Minli Li, Jingjing Gan, Huan Wang. Engineered Inner Ear Drug Delivery Systems for Hearing Loss Treatment[J]. Research, 2026 , 9 (8) : 1396 - . DOI: 10.34133/research.1396
Full Text
Less
Introduction
Less
Hearing loss is gradually becoming a global problem. Noise pollution, infection, ototoxic drugs, and genetic factors contribute to disease progression, causing important impairments in patients. These pathological factors can damage the structures responsible for sound transmission or disrupt the transmission of neural impulses to the brain, thereby resulting in conductive hearing loss, sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), or mixed types. The associated difficulties in communication may cause long-term social isolation and aggravate cognitive disorders, while challenges in securing and maintaining employment further increase the financial burden on patients, their families, and society as a whole [1]. Therefore, hearing loss represents a substantial burden from both individual and societal perspectives.
Based on these pathological mechanisms, therapeutic strategies mainly target the restoration or protection of cochlear structures and neural components. Currently, cochlear implantation (CI) is an effective intervention when hearing aids are no longer beneficial, as it can convert sound into electrical signals and directly stimulate spiral ganglion (SG) cells of the cochlear nerve [1,2]. However, whether a patient’s condition is suitable for CI must be carefully evaluated. To achieve pharmacological intervention at specific targets, multiple drug delivery routes have been explored. Systemic administration is widely used but often limited by low drug solubility, poor bioavailability, and the presence of the blood–labyrinth barrier (BLB), which restricts drug penetration into the inner ear [3]. To overcome these limitations, local delivery strategies such as trans-tympanic membrane (TM) delivery and intracochlear administration have been developed, enabling more direct access to the inner ear and improving targeting efficiency. With the advancement of therapeutic approaches, a variety of therapeutic agents including antioxidants and anti-inflammatory agents have been reported for hearing loss treatment. Moreover, gene therapy has made important progress over the past few years, particularly in the treatment of otoferlin (OTOF)-related hearing loss [4,5]. To date, several approaches have been demonstrated to be effective in animal models [6,7]. Multiple clinical trials of OTOF gene therapy are currently recruiting participants (NCT05821959, NCT06722170). Nevertheless, the complex anatomy of the inner ear necessitates the development of suitable delivery systems to enhance therapeutic efficacy.
This review outlines the development of inner ear drug delivery systems for hearing loss treatment (Fig. 1). First, we introduce the physiological structures of the ear and emphasize the need for engineered inner ear drug delivery strategies. Next, we systematically summarize current drug delivery routes for inner ear treatment, including systemic administration, TM drug delivery, intratympanic drug delivery, and intracochlear drug delivery. We then discuss current therapeutic agents and drug delivery carriers for hearing loss therapy and illustrate recent advances regarding ongoing clinical trials. Finally, we address the challenges and limitations of the current inner ear drug delivery systems and point out possible solutions. Overall, rather than focusing on specific aspects such as biological barriers, biomaterial applications, or introducing delivery routes alongside corresponding carrier systems, our review provides a dedicated and integrated discussion [8–10]. Generally, this structured framework provides a systematic and comprehensive perspective, which facilitates a clearer and more holistic understanding of engineered inner ear drug delivery systems. This review is expected to inspire researchers in related fields and provide them with theoretical support.
Ear Structure and Hearing Loss
Less
Physiological structure of ear
Anatomically, the ear consists of the external ear, the middle ear, and the inner ear (Fig. 2A). The external ear and the middle ear are separated by the TM, which is a thin, concave tissue. TM contains epidermal epithelium and lamina propria, which includes fibroblasts and mucosal epithelium (Fig. 2Ci) [11]. The middle ear includes the tympanic cavity, malleus, incus, and stapes. The malleus is connected to the incus, whose opposite end connects to the stapes stem, and the stapes footplate leans against the opening of the oval window (OW). The inner ear and the middle ear are separated by the round window (RW) and the OW. These openings serve as gateways from the middle ear to the cochlea [12]. The RW membrane (RWM) and the OW membrane (OWM) cover them, respectively. The RWM is a 3-layer membrane composed of an outer epithelial layer, a middle connective tissue layer, and an inner epithelial layer (Fig. 2Cii) [11]. When acoustic waves are transmitted, the stapes footplate vibrates the cochlear perilymph through the OWM. This pressure is subsequently transmitted to the RWM, which vibrates in the opposite direction to balance the pressure. These vibrations are then delivered to the cochlea. The cochlea is a system of coiled tubes: the scala vestibuli, the scala media, and the scala tympani. Perilymph fills the scala vestibuli and the scala tympani, while endolymph fills the scala media. The scala tympani and the scala media are separated by the hair cell (HC)-covered basilar membrane. High-frequency sounds vibrate the basal part of the basilar membrane, whereas low-frequency sounds vibrate the sensory HCs of the apical part (Fig. 2B). HCs serve as the receptor organs in response to the vibration of the basilar membrane (Fig. 2Di). HCs can be divided into inner HCs (IHCs) and outer HCs (OHCs). IHCs are mainly responsible for converting mechanical vibrations into neural signals for transmission, and OHCs can enhance auditory sensitivity through mechanical amplification [13].
In the event of sound vibration, the stereocilia on the HCs bend in the direction of the longest one. This phenomenon results in the opening of the K+ channels, leading to depolarization, which subsequently triggers the opening of the voltage-gated Ca2+ channels, enhancing depolarization, promoting glutamate release, and depolarizing the sensory nerve. Apparently, different K+ concentrations between HCs and endolymph are vital for maintaining their functions. The stria vascularis (SV) plays an important role in safeguarding a high-potassium, positive potential environment. It is a highly vascularized epithelial–mesodermal tissue located in the lateral wall of the cochlea. The SV is composed of marginal, intermediate, and basal cells. The Na-K-2Cl cotransporter 1 and the Na/K-ATPase (adenosine triphosphatase) pump are jointly involved in K+ transportation to the endolymph, facilitating the formation of the +80-mV endocochlear potential (EP) [14]. After being transported from the SV to the endolymph and entering HCs, K+ drains from HCs into the perilymph and returns to the SV through gap junctions to form the K+ cycle (Fig. 2Dii) [15]. Furthermore, the BLB, a physicochemical barrier between the body’s circulatory system and the cochlea, functions to maintain a stable inner ear environment [16]. In the BLB, the basement membrane surrounds the endothelium, and pericytes surround the basement membrane. The BLB presents similarities with the blood–brain barrier (BBB) in both structure and cell types. These barriers both have tight junctions composed of similar proteins connecting the endothelial cells [17].
We will briefly introduce several other structures of the inner ear that have the potential to serve as administration sites. The utricle is a receptor for linear accelerating and decelerating motion. It is a slightly compressed and elongated oval capsule connected to the saccule [18]. The endolymphatic sac is the terminal expansion segment of the membranous labyrinth and connects with the utricle for endolymph absorption and drainage. Endolymphatic sac dysfunction can lead to endolymph accumulation, a common phenomenon in Ménière’s disease [19]. Semicircular canals are 3 two-thirds circular tubes, with both ends opening to the vestibule. They are composed of bony semicircular canals and semicircular ducts. According to spatial location, there are lateral, superior, and posterior semicircular canals (PSCC). These canals monitor and regulate angular head acceleration [20].
Pathological factors causing hearing loss
Conductive hearing loss is characterized by an interruption in transmitting sound waves to the cochlea, while SNHL is characterized by the onset of hearing impairment due to the malfunction of the structures responsible for translating neural impulses to the brain [1]. Multiple factors are related to the development of SNHL, such as noise exposure, aging, genetic susceptibility, drug ototoxicity, viral infections, hyperbilirubinemia, and Ménière’s disease.
In the field of SNHL, noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is an important subset characterized by hearing loss subsequent to noise exposure. NIHL can be caused by exposure to a potent acoustic stimulus or developing as a long-term process. Although moderate-intensity exposures cause only a temporary threshold shift, continuous damage may result in the loss of HCs and SG neurons (SGNs), which leads to a permanent threshold shift [21]. In addition, noise can impact SV-maintained inner ear homeostasis. After noise exposure, increased nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase (NOX) subunit and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels promote reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, further causing SV dysfunction [22]. Moreover, cochlear resident macrophages exhibit pro-inflammatory characteristics in NIHL promotion. Activated resident macrophages present morphological changes and increase in number, and their migration to the HCs area leads to OHC loss and ribbon synapse damage [23]. Even worse, inflammation and ROS are 2 processes that mutually facilitate each other.
In age-related hearing loss (ARHL), organ and tissue degeneration such as HC loss and SV and SGN degeneration accelerate ARHL development [24]. These age-related damages accumulate and increase oxidative stress, which causes DNA, lysosome, and mitochondria damage, elevates ROS levels, and further promotes the onset of ARHL [25]. At the molecule level, multiple signaling pathways are involved in ARHL processing, such as sirtuin1 (SIRT1), phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (Akt)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2)/antioxidant response element (ARE), and atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP)/natriuretic peptide receptor A (NPRA)/cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP)/protein kinase G (PKG) signaling pathways. SIRT1 is a nicotinamide adenosine dinucleotide (NAD)-dependent deacetylase; its activation protects HCs through autophagy restoration [26]. Low activity of Akt-mTORC1 hinders neonatal murine HC formation [27]. Connexin-26 gene gap junction protein β2 (GJB2) gene mutation affects the Nrf2/ARE signaling pathway, lowers Nrf2 or Nrf2/ARE-controlled heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) expression, and accelerates ARHL progression [28]. Activation of the ANP/NPRA/cGMP/PKG signaling pathway protects SGNs and facilitates their regeneration [29].
Genetic factors are also important pathological determinants of SNHL [30]. Hereditary hearing loss can be classified into syndromic hearing loss and nonsyndromic hearing loss. Based on the mode of inheritance, there are autosomal recessive, autosomal dominant, X-linked, mitochondrial four patterns [31]. Among the various forms of hereditary hearing loss, several causative genes have been identified as promising therapeutic targets. One notable example is autosomal recessive deafness 9 (DFNB9), which is caused by mutations in OTOF. OTOF encodes otoferlin, a synaptic protein essential for maintaining normal IHC function [2]. Encouragingly, OTOF gene therapy has not only been shown to effectively alleviate hearing loss in animal models but also demonstrated therapeutic efficacy in pediatric patients [32,33]. Adeno-associated virus (AAV)-OTOF injection restored a 5-year-old patient hearing and recognizing speech [32]. In addition to OTOF, several other genes have been frequently implicated in hereditary hearing loss. GJB2, solute carrier family 26, member 4 (SLC26A4), and usherin (USH2A) are the commonly affected genes. The deletion of G at positions 30 to 35 (mutation 35delG) of the GJB2 gene was commonly detected in DFNB1 families; this mutation leads to the complete loss of connexin 26 (Cx26) function and further causes cochlear developmental disorders [34–37]. SLC26A4 encodes pendrin, which is essential for maintaining inner ear homeostasis, and mutations in this gene may result in autosomal recessive deafness 4 (DFNB4) [38]. USH2A encodes usherin; the point deletion in exon 13 (c.2299delG) is a common pathogenic variation of USH2A [39]. Human frameshift mutation c.2299delG is basically equal to c.2290delG mutation in mouse model. Studies have shown that the c.2290delG mutation leads to mislocalization of truncated protein in the HCs and disorganization of stereocilia bundles [40].
Drug ototoxicity is considered another crucial pathological factor. Aminoglycoside antibiotics, such as gentamicin and neomycin, can induce HC death and impair hearing. Aminoglycoside antibiotics enter the endolymph with the help of their main transporter, megalin, and reach HCs through the mechano-electrical transduction (MET) channel [41]. The damaging mechanism of aminoglycoside antibiotics is thought to be related to the calcium uptake by mitochondria and lipid metabolism disorders [42,43]. Platinum-based drugs, for example, cisplatin, can enter the inner ear with the assistance of copper transporter 1 and organic cation transporter 2. Thereafter, cisplatin enters the HCs, promoting the release of inflammatory factors like tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), IL-1β, and IL-6. These factors collectively break the balance between free radicals and antioxidant systems, facilitate ROS generation, and further damage HCs through cytoplasmic organelle damage and DNA damage [44].
In addition to ototoxic drugs, viral infection is another promoter of hearing loss. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is one of the most common nongenetic factors contributing to SNHL. CMV infection results in up-regulated pro-inflammatory factor expression and SGN loss, and finally leads to SNHL [45]. Furthermore, SNHL is part of a group of clinical signs of congenital rubella syndrome, which is caused by the rubella virus. Rubella virus may cause SNHL by changing the expression of sensory development-related genes. For instance, myosin VIIA (MYO7A) was observed to decline in both primary endothelial cells of fetuses and adults after rubella virus infection [46].
Hyperbilirubinemia is also a risk factor that needs to be considered. Unconjugated bilirubin causes auditory nerve fiber demyelination and SGN density decline, as well as necrosis and pyroptosis in a rat injury model [47]. Ménière’s disease requires attention, as patients exhibit varying degrees of endolymphatic hydrops. Neuronal toxicity is considered the main mechanism of Ménière’s disease, as histopathological analysis revealed severe SG injury and loss [48]. The molecular mechanisms can be attributed to nitric oxide synthase-triggered apoptosis through caspase-dependent and caspase-independent pathways, activation of ROS, and endolymphatic hydrops-mediated stress [49].
Drug Delivery Routes
Less
The selection of an appropriate drug delivery route to the inner ear is intricately linked to the pathophysiology of specific ear diseases. In cases of drug- or noise-induced hearing loss, antioxidant-loaded nanocarriers and injectable hydrogels are likely to be employed to alleviate ROS-associated inner ear damage through intratympanic injection (IT) or intracochlear administration. For patients with Ménière’s disease who suffer from inflammation-related damage [50], both systemic administration and IT delivery are considered appropriate routes. Regarding hereditary hearing loss, a more precise intracochlear administration route, such as PSCC injection, is required for effective restoration of auditory function (Fig. 3).
Diverse inner ear drug delivery routes have been studied to achieve better therapeutic effects. These routes are primarily divided into systemic drug delivery, drug delivery through the TM, intracochlear drug delivery (Fig. 4), and CI. We will next describe these administration routes in more detail.
Systemic drug delivery
Systemic drug delivery includes multiple methods such as intravenous, intramuscular injection, and oral routes [10]. However, the complicated structure of the BLB impedes the delivery of therapeutic agents. Therefore, some patients require more precise treatment.
Drug delivery through TM
To reduce the adverse effects engendered by repeated systemic administration, more precise drug delivery routes—specifically delivery through the TM—have been studied. In detail, drugs can cross the TM through noninvasive or invasive ways [51]. Through the noninvasive method, drugs need to cross the TM and reach the middle ear, then permeate through the RWM or OWM, and eventually reach the inner ear. However, it is a challenge for the therapeutic agent to cross the epidermal epithelium-based TM outermost layer [11]. Hence, an invasive method, IT, is required, which can deliver drugs/drug delivery systems directly to the middle ear or place them at the RWM. Zou et al. [52] used silver nanoparticles (NPs) to observe the efficiency of IT. After IT, silver NPs crossed the OW and RW, presenting a gradient concentration from the middle ear to the inner ear. Compared with systemic administration, dexamethasone (DEX) labeled with a fluorescent marker exhibited moderate fluorescence 12 h post-injection [53]. As a convenient and effective administration route, IT is preferred in both research and clinical areas. Furthermore, a combination of systemic administration and IT enables rapid detection of mimic drug fluorescent signal, which is approximately 3 min post-administration [54]. Nevertheless, IT still carries risks of pain, tongue numbness, and vertigo. To reduce these complications, it is preferred to perform IT at the anterior–inferior quadrant of the TM [55]. Additionally, for children who need multiple treatments, a tympanostomy tube is a good choice to alleviate discomfort. Moreover, the operator’s experience is of great importance to avoid inaccurate injection.
Intracochlear drug delivery and CI
To further elevate inner ear drug concentration, intracochlear drug delivery has attracted much attention. After intracochlear drug delivery, drug concentration in the perilymph was found to be 7 times higher than that after IT [56]. Intracochlear drug delivery could be accomplished through various approaches. Cochleostomy is viable at the basal turn of the cochlea, and trans-OWM is a considerable choice, but related reports are limited [57]. Trans-RWM is more common, directly placing/injecting drugs on/through the RWM. Drug delivery systems were still detected 8 weeks after administration through RWM incision [58]. In addition, the mastoid approach offers a novel idea for trans-RWM drug delivery through the retroauricular area. Compared with IT and intraperitoneal drug delivery, the mastoid approach presents the best therapeutic effect, achieving a maximum DEX concentration in inner ear perilymph of 92.53 ± 4.68 μg/l [59]. Generally, these administration methods have the advantages of precise drug delivery and reducing side effects. However, variations in size and structure among individuals complicate the location of the RWM. The intricate and delicate nature of the inner ear structure necessitates that operators have extensive experience. Drug clearance via the eustachian tube becomes an issue for reaching effective therapeutic concentrations as well. Furthermore, a decreasing trend of dye distribution from base to apex after RWM injection indicates uneven drug concentration in the cochlea [60]. Hence, Wang et al. [61] modified the poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) NPs by targeting peptide A665, enabling the NPs to bind a protein exclusively expressed by OHCs. This modification contributes to drug redistribution and preserves OHCs from all turns of the cochlea. In gene therapy, uneven drug distribution could potentially result in constrained viral transduction. Therefore, utricle injection has been studied. The saccular anatomy of the utricle allows easier access to the endolymphatic compartment, which exhibits a slightly higher transduction rate than RWM injection while minimizing the risk of damaging cochlear structures [62]. Nevertheless, reports based on this administration method are relatively scarce, possibly because this method has limitations regarding operations.
Canalostomy refers to surgical pore creation toward the vestibular semicircular canal, mostly at the PSCC. Injection through the PSCC is a perilymph selectively targeted delivery route. In vivo real-time monitoring showed that gold NPs injected via the PSCC primarily distributed in the scala vestibuli and scala tympani rather than the scala media, which may facilitate perilymph-targeted administration [63].
The endolymphatic sac is another potential administration site exposed through the extradural posterior cranial fossa approach. After exposing the operculum aperture (where the endolymphatic sac extends toward the sigmoid sinus), a small incision is made for drug delivery. The injected fluorescent indicators were primarily distributed in the vestibule instead of the cochlea, offering a therapeutic possibility for vestibular lesion-related diseases [64]. Cochleostomy could deliver the agent to the scala tympani and/or the scala media endolymph. Kim and Ricci [65] reported a chemo-mechanical cochleostomy, which can preserve hearing for the in vivo functional imaging.
CI is a crucial treatment for SNHL, which is commonly combined with cochleostomy. During the CI procedure, part of the mastoid is removed, and a tiny hole allows electrode installation [66]. However, as an invasive procedure, CI may lead to complications such as injury, foreign body response, and cochlear fibrosis. To mitigate these effects, multiple strategies have been developed, including perioperative pharmacological interventions, electrode-array design improvements, and local drug delivery approaches. Preoperative systemic glucocorticoids and antibiotics are supposed to ameliorate immune responses and bacterial infections [67]. IT administration of triamcinolone-acetonide suspension, 40 mg/ml, has also been shown to protect against cochlear fibrosis [68]. To minimize insertion-related trauma, appropriate implant insertion depth is critical. Therefore, Mertens et al. [69] developed a diameter and width-based elliptic circular approximation system to accurately predict a suitable insertion depth. Besides, a forward-facing optical coherence tomography (OCT) probe was studied to provide the real-time image of the cochlear lumen, thereby enabling timely adjustments and reducing unnecessary tissue damage [70]. Beyond surgical guidance, optimization of electrode-array design represents another crucial strategy for reducing insertion trauma. Electrode diameter around 0.4 to 0.5 mm, with 20 electrodes on a single insertion length (25 mm), is recommended to minimize the insertion injury [71]. Itawi et al. [72] developed a steerable thin-film electrode array with gold electrodes. The large surface area of gold electrodes, adjustable stiffness, and curvature made this 10-μm-thick electrode a promising option for future CI applications. In addition to mechanical optimization, local drug delivery systems have emerged as an attractive strategy for suppressing fibrosis. From the perspective of drug delivery system design, electrode coating, drug-loaded electrodes, and connecting them with drug reservoirs or pump systems are 3 feasible options to alleviate fibrosis [73]. Among these 3 choices, electrode coating has aroused great attention. The coatings are intended to reduce fibrosis by decreasing friction and minimizing the contact between inner ear tissue and the implants, as Jensen et al. [74] found that cells are more likely to adhere and proliferate on the surface of platinum electrodes, rather than the poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) coating. To date, diverse polymers with good biocompatibility and low cytotoxicity like hydrogels [75] are used in electrode coating. Horne et al. [76] reported a hydrogel coating, in which poly(carboxybetaine methacrylate) was simultaneously photo-grafted and photo-polymerized onto PDMS. This coating effectively reduced the capsule thickness during 1 year of the implantation with its anti-fouling property. Furthermore, therapeutic agents could be loaded in the electrode coating to further alleviate fibrosis. Ren et al. [77] prepared a porous methacrylated PDMS (MA-PDMS)-coated cochlear electrode filled with gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA), Ti3C2Tx MXene (MXene), and therapeutic agents, which effectively improved cell condition and viability. Despite these advances in anti-fibrotic strategies, real-time monitoring of fibrosis progression following CI remains challenging, while de Rijk et al. [78] pointed out that complex impedance is becoming a novel marker for real-time tracking. Their findings suggest that impedance-based monitoring may provide a noninvasive and clinically translatable approach for assessing cochlear fibrosis after implantation.
Therapeutic Drugs Used in Inner Ear Disorders
Less
While the route of administration determines how therapeutic agents gain access to the inner ear, the choice of drug indicates the biological targets and therapeutic outcomes of treatment. Anti-inflammatory drugs, antioxidants, nanozymes, and factors have attracted considerable attention. We will next describe them in detail.
Anti-inflammatory drugs
Glucocorticoids, exerting their effects through interactions with glucocorticoid receptors, play an important role in SNHL treatment. Glucocorticoid receptors exist in the inner ear of both normal individuals and NIHL patients, offering a possibility for glucocorticoid therapy [79]. DEX is one of the most widely used glucocorticoids in inner ear therapy, exhibiting remarkable anti-inflammatory properties. It not only lowers the levels of inflammatory factors but also exhibits anti-apoptotic effects. When the concentration is higher than 5 μg/ml, DEX can preserve both IHCs and OHCs against 0.3 M gentamicin damage. This protective effect is mediated through the down-regulation of the apoptosis activator B cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2)-associated X protein (Bax) [80]. Nevertheless, the low water solubility of DEX promotes its conjugation with liquid crystalline NPs to accelerate DEX delivery [81]. In addition, Yang et al. [82] loaded DEX into phospholipid-based cationic-polyethyleneglycol (PEG) NPs, which yielded superior suppression of inflammatory factors. Furthermore, Mustafa et al. [83] prepared saponin-coated nanocomposite-gold nanorods enclosed in mesoporous silica for DEX loading (NPs/DEX) (Fig. 5Ai). Gold nanorods possess photothermal conversion functions [84,85], thereby facilitating drug release and RWM permeation (Fig. 5Aii).
Antioxidants
Sodium thiosulfate [Na2S2O3 (STS)] is a cisplatin-neutralizing agent that can effectively inactivate cisplatin by binding it [86]. Patients receiving STS treatment exhibited a significantly lower risk of suffering from ototoxic effects during platinum-based chemotherapy [87].
Glutathione [γ-l-glutamyl-l-cysteinyl-glycine (GSH)] is a crucial reducing agent involved in various biological processes, including antioxidant activity, anti-inflammatory activity, and DNA synthesis [88]. Kim et al. [89] found that bucillamine facilitates GSH synthesis by inducing the intranuclear translocation of Nrf2, which subsequently increases γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase and GSH synthetase expression, thereby elevating the level of intracellular GSH. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) serves as an indirect GSH supplement [90]. NAC can attenuate ROS level elevation in HCs’ mitochondria. It has been reported that 20 mM NAC could alleviate 50 mM cisplatin-induced ototoxicity [91].
As a classical analog of glutathione peroxidase (GPx), ebselen presents excellent ROS- scavenging and anti-inflammatory properties. A phase 2 trial (NCT01444846) showed that 400 mg of ebselen, twice a day, could alleviate noise-induced temporary threshold shifts at 4 kHz [92]. In another delivery system, ebselen liposomes were loaded in GelMA microspheres coupled with a polydopamine (PDA) layer. This delivery system exhibited a 93 ± 2% survival rate of OHCs at 32-kHz frequency [93]. Additionally, a novel class of isoselenazolones with GPx-like characteristics has been shown to protect HCs by suppressing plasma pro-inflammatory factors (malonaldehyde, IL-6, and TNF-α) levels while alleviating superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity reduction [94].
α-Lipoic acid (ALA), also known as thioctic acid (C8H14O2S2), facilitates an increase in intracellular GSH levels and GPx expression. This short-chain fatty acid exhibits ROS scavenging, antioxidant protein level adjustment, and anti-inflammatory properties [95]. In a cisplatin-induced hearing loss model, a PDA-based nanogel (PDA@microcarriers-ALA) evidenced the inner ear protective effect of ALA. 2′,7′-Dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) detection revealed that the PDA@microcarriers-ALA pretreated group showed a similar fluorescent signal to that of the control group, while cisplatin-treated house ear institute–organ of Corti 1 (HEI-OC1) cells exhibited stronger fluorescence, indicating a higher level of ROS [96]. Apart from this, ALA’s apoptosis suppression effect alleviates mitochondria ROS level elevation. The up-regulation of Bcl-2 and down-regulation of Bax together prevent apoptosis [97]. Jung et al. [98] also found that antioxidant proteins, including HO-1, SOD-1, and SOD-2 levels, all exhibited an increasing tendency after ALA-NP administration.
Vitamin C and vitamin E are crucial water- and lipid-soluble vitamins, respectively. Vitamin C possesses both anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities; it is hypothesized to reduce ROS generation by inhibiting the activation of ROS/nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) pathway [99]. Long-term oral vitamin C administration (150 mg/kg/d) protects hearing by inhibiting NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome activation [100]. Rats receiving vitamins A, C, and E and Mg2+ showed significant recovery after noise exposure for 30 d. The antioxidant effects of the vitamins were evidenced by reduced levels of pro-apoptotic caspase-3 and Bax, as well as elevated levels of GPx1 and Bcl-2 [101].
Astaxanthin is a natural marine carotenoid that exhibits anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. Astaxanthin possesses 100 to 500 times more potent oxygen radical absorbance capacity and 10 times higher free radical inhibitory activity than α-tocopherol [102]. In hearing loss treatment, astaxanthin mainly combats cisplatin-induced ototoxicity by activating the Nrf2-mediated pathway. Furthermore, it can down-regulate apoptotic-related gene expression [103]. Therefore, it is a promising agent. However, crossing the RWM remains a challenge due to its hydrophobicity and instability. Gu et al. [104] attempted to solve this problem by loading it into poly(propylene sulfide)-PEG-based NPs, which could effectively deplete ROS.
Various plant-derived drugs exhibit outstanding antioxidant effects as well. Chen and colleagues [105] loaded panax, saponins, and tanshinone IIA into space-station-like composite NPs (CCC@mPP NPs), which are capable of preserving HCs against aminoglycoside antibiotics or cisplatin-induced damage. As a kind of Chinese herbal medicine, berberine can be used for hearing loss treatment. Zhao et al. [106] prepared a ROS-responsive NP for berberine inner ear administration against NIHL. It was found that 0.01 mg/ml NPs could reduce ROS levels by 50.73%. In addition, decreasing levels of Berberine chloride has the properties of apoptosis suppression, mitochondrial membrane potential maintenance, and reduction of ROS accumulation. Pretreatment with 0.1 or 1 μM berberine chloride could prevent aminoglycoside antibiotic-induced OHC loss and stereocilia degeneration [107].
Allomelanin is a nitrogen-free melanin that usually exists in fungi. It can be artificially synthesized from 1,8-dihydroxynaphthalene (1,8-DHN). Chen et al. [108] prepared 1,8-DHN-based allomelanin NPs (AMNPs) (Fig. 5Bi), which exhibited outstanding free radical scavenging effects (Fig. 5Bii and iii). AMNPs present protective effects against both cisplatin-induced damage and NIHL. After treatment with AMNPs, HCs from the apex and middle regions were significantly preserved. Moreover, AMNPs help in alleviating SGN loss and improving IHC survival rate in NIHL, which might be attributed to the regulation of the Stat1 gene and the Janus kinase (JAK)–signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signaling pathway.
Nanozymes, a class of nanomaterials with enzyme-like activities, have wide applications in biomedical and therapeutic fields [109–111]. Huo et al. [112] prepared a palladium (Pd)-based single-atom nanozyme (SAN) exhibiting SOD and catalase (CAT) activities (Fig. 5Ci and ii). This nanozyme reduced apoptosis and maintained mitochondrial potential by alleviating neomycin-induced mitochondrial ROS level increases. It was demonstrated that 1 μg/ml of Pd performs the best protective effect against neomycin-induced damage (Fig. 5Ciii). In addition, Ge et al. [113] synthesized NAC-derived carbonized polymer dots (NAC CPDs) loaded within manganese porphyrin-doped metal–organic frameworks and then encapsulated with GelMA and PDA. This multifunctional nanozyme microcapsule exhibited SOD and CAT activities as well. It decreased mitochondrial depolarization, lowered ROS levels, reduced inflammation, and restored DNA damage.
Factors
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a neurotrophic protein, promotes neuron survival. Pisani et al. [114] pointed out the protective effects of human recombinant BDNF (rhBDNF) against cisplatin-induced damage by preserving paired ribbon synapses and OHCs. This protection is thought to be associated with the balance between tyrosine kinase B (TrkB) and p75 (another BDNF receptor whose activation promotes apoptosis). Increasing TrkB phosphorylation and decreasing p75 levels collectively indicate the antioxidant effects of rhBDNF. Neurotrophin-3 (NT-3) is a neurite-promoting factor. Both NT-3 and its receptor TrkC are crucial for maintaining the function of basal turn SG cells function [115]. Wang et al. [116] prepared a peptide-conjugated, PEG-based injectable hydrogel system for sustained NT-3 release, offering a new option for NT-3 inner ear delivery. Furthermore, Zhao et al. [117] conjugated pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF) to a prestin-targeting peptide 2 with N-succinimidyl-3-maleimidopropionate (PrTP2-SMP/PEDF), enabling its aggregation and sustained release around the OHCs, effectively reducing the loss of OHCs and SGNs.
Drug Delivery Systems
Less
Although the therapeutic agents are the primary determinants of treatment efficacy, successful inner ear therapy also depends on the ability to deliver and maintain the drugs at the target site in a controlled and sustained manner. Consequently, increasing attention has been directed toward the development of advanced carrier systems capable of improving drug stability, prolonging residence time, and enhancing intracochlear distribution. A variety of drug delivery systems, including nanocarriers, injectable hydrogels, and micropumps, are under investigation. We summarize these approaches for inner ear delivery (Table 1) and assess several drug delivery systems (Fig. 6A) in order to provide a comprehensive overview.
Nanocarrier
Nanocarriers constitute an important part of biomedical engineering [118–125]. They have the advantages of improving drug stability and solubility, providing platforms for sustained and targeted drug delivery. They can be approximately divided into organic carriers, inorganic nanocarriers, and hybrid carriers based on their compositions [126]. According to the loading principle, nanocarriers are categorized into molecular loading, surface loading, matrix loading, and cavity loading systems [127]. To date, PLGA-based NPs, silica-based NPs (SNPs)/mesoporous silica-based NPs (MSNs), extracellular vesicles (EVs), exosomes, liposomes, and viruses are commonly used nanocarriers. Additionally, nanozymes have also demonstrated potential as drug carriers [128]. However, in the context of inner ear drug delivery, they are predominantly employed as therapeutic agents.
PLGA-based nanocarrier
PLGA, a copolymer of lactic and glycolic acid, exhibits good biocompatibility and biodegradability [129,130]. Zhang et al. [129] found that PLGA-based NPs crossed the RWM in a concentration-dependent manner via the transcellular pathway. However, the fluorescent integrity of the mimic drug in the RWM dropped at 60 min after administration, indicating low potential for long-term therapy. To address this problem, Ma et al. [131] loaded ferrostatin-1 (Fer-1) into a chitosan (CS)-PLGA-based, polypeptide LS19-coupled thermosensitive nanodelivery system, PLGA-CS-LS19-Fer-1-NPs (Fig. 6B). CS and glycerophosphate respectively empowered this system with stronger adhesion and thermosensitive properties.
SNPs/MSNs
SNPs/MSNs are widely used in the development of the biomedical area. SNPs/MSNs possess a large surface area, good mechanical stability, low cytotoxicity, and adjustable size [132–134]. The ordered porous structures of MSNs are beneficial for drug/gene loading and release control. Chen et al. [135] loaded transforming growth factor β1 (TGFβ1)–small interfering RNA (siRNA) into amino (-NH2) functionalized MSN (MSN-NH2), aimed at alleviating TGFβ secretion-induced fibrosis while patients receive CI. The TGFβ1 mRNA expression level was found to be 41.1% lower in MSN-NH2-siTGFβ1-transfected macrophages than that in the control group, indicating that this MSN-based inner ear delivery system is a promising option to mitigate CI-induced side effects.
EVs and exosomes
EVs are cell-secreted, natural carriers that formerly exist as intraluminal vesicles in multivesicular compartments [136]. Exosomes (round-shape carriers, diameter commonly ranging from 50 to 150 nm) are secreted after late endosomes/multivesicular compartments fuse with the plasma membrane [137]. Therefore, they possess low immunogenicity and are easily accessible. These properties have attracted much attention to explore exosomes in disease treatment [138,139]. Hao et al. [140] prepared neural progenitor cell-derived, microRNA-21-transfected exosomes, which recovered inflammation-related hearing loss at a concentration of 0.8 μg/μl. Inspired by cell therapy strategies [141], Liu et al. [142] demonstrated that mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes (Fig. 6C) could protect HCs from neomycin-induced damage by reducing ROS level.
Liposomes
Liposomes are artificial phospholipid bilayer vesicles similar to the structure of cell membranes and possess high drug loading capacity [143]. Hydrophilic drugs are commonly loaded in their aqueous core, and the lipid bilayer is employed for hydrophobic drugs [144]. Zou et al. [145] confirmed the good biocompatibility of liposomes, finding that no hearing impairments or inflammatory biological marker expression changes were observed after administration. To realize precise therapy, An et al. [146] prepared an LS19 (OHC targeting peptide)-coupled, liposome-based forskolin (FSK) delivery system. It was demonstrated that the hearing condition of mice presented significant improvement in the LS19-FSK-NP receiving group, while the control group performed severe hearing loss. Hou et al. [147] used HC mitochondria-targeting tetrapeptide SS-31 to modify liposomes; the optimized system could maintain the HC MET channel activity and would not result in alterations in gentamicin uptake.
Virus carriers and gene therapy
Gene therapy has emerged as a pivotal treatment for SNHL. Since diverse biological entity-based materials have been rapidly developing in recent years, the selection of appropriate gene vectors is of paramount importance. AAV attracts great attention [7,33]. AAV-mediated SNHL treatment encompasses gene replacement, gene silencing, and gene editing. Gene replacement aims at providing functional proteins to recover gene mutation-induced protein loss [148]. Isgrig et al. [149] delivered Ildr1 complementary DNA (cDNA) to the organ of Corti and the cochlear lateral wall of Ildr1w−/− mice, a human autosomal recessive hereditary hearing loss 42 (DFNB42) animal model, using AAV2.7m8 (targeting IHCs, OHCs, and supporting cells of the organ of Corti) and AAV8BP2 (targeting different types of cochlear lateral wall cells) vectors, respectively (Fig. 6Di). Ildr1 cDNA delivery restored Ildr1 gene expression, effectively enhanced tight junction network organization, and improved cochlear structural integrity. HC restoration primarily occurred in the OHCs, which exhibited a remarkable increase in survival rate (Fig. 6Dii). In OTOF-related gene therapy, given that the coding sequence of the OTOF gene (~6 kb) substantially exceeds the packaging capacity of AAV vectors (~ 4.7 kb), Qi et al. [150] designed a dual-AAV system to deliver the OTOF gene via 2 separate vectors. Hu et al. [33] specially developed 2 truncated myosin 15 (Myo15) promoters sufficiently compact for AAV packaging while enabling selective expression of human OTOF in HCs. Gene silencing has been demonstrated to function by down-regulating or inhibiting the expression of related genes, thereby preventing the accumulation of toxic proteins [148]. RNA interference (RNAi) is one of the major gene silencing techniques. Yoshimura et al. [151] proved the efficacy of RNAi-mediated gene silencing in a human Tmc1 deafness model—Beethoven heterozygous mice (Tmc1Bth/+). Compared with untreated mice (whose IHC hair bundles are apparently disorganized with fused stereocilia in the apical region), the AAV9 carrying transgene cassette of the microRNA Tmc1 (AAV9.miTmc1)-treated group preserved more IHC hair bundles and exhibited some morphologically normal hair bundles. Gene editing employs the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)–CRISPR-associated systems (Cas), which enable specific base conversions [152]. This technique was proved effective in alleviating the microRNA-96 14C>A mutation in a mouse model. Ten weeks after injecting AAV serotype 2 (AAV2)–KKH variants of Staphylococcus aureus Cas9 (SaCas9-KKH)–single guide RNA (sgRNA), auditory brainstem response (ABR) results of the mice exhibited improvements at frequencies from 5.6 to 16 kHz. At 14 and 20 weeks after injection, the ABR thresholds showed improvements of 21 and 28 dB, respectively, ranging from 5.6- to 16-kHz frequencies as well. This suggests the efficacy of AAV2-mediated genome editing in both short-term and long-term hearing preservation [153]. Xue et al. [154] reported an AAV-delivered mini-dCas13X RNA editing system, mxABE, which promoted the conversion of TAG to TGG in a humanized Otof Q829X/Q829X mouse model. This editing strategy restored OTOF expression in nearly 100% of IHCs and rescued auditory function to near wild-type (WT) levels.
Ultrasound-meditated microbubbles
USMB is a combination of ultrasound (US) and microbubbles (MBs), which has gained increasing attention in inner ear disorders therapy in recent years. USMB-mediated sonoporation has been demonstrated to promote the formation of tiny holes in the RWM, accompanied by minimal damage to the tissue, which subsequently enhances RWM permeability temporarily and augments the drug concentration delivered to the inner ear (Fig. 6E) [155,156]. In a guinea pig model, Shih et al. [157] observed that the inner ear perilymphatic fluorescence intensity of biotin-fluorescein 5-isothiocyanate (FITC) in the USMB group was notably higher than in the RW soaking group. Additionally, without US, MBs failed to elevate the inner ear drug concentration, confirming the critical role of US in enhancing RWM permeability. In another work, He et al. [158] identified USMB as a promising strategy for reversible opening of the BLB. As the primary hindrance in the systemic delivery route, opening the BLB greatly promoted the delivery of hydrophobic curcumin into the inner ear, which preserved nearly all HCs from 3 turns against cisplatin-induced damage. Overall, USMB is a potential strategy that promotes inner ear disease treatment.
Microshotgun
In order to facilitate the crossing of biological barriers during inner ear drug delivery, Liang et al. [159] designed a gun-like, metal-free, slim-waist drug carrier. In this system, a microtube (thickness of about 15 μm, pore diameter of about 5 μm) functions as the barrel, NPs serve as the bullets, water acts as an ignitor, and solid dispersion acts as the fuel. Organic acids, basic carbonate salt, and water together yield the carbon dioxide gas, which enables NP initial acceleration and their penetration through the barrier’s outer layer. External magnetic fields continually propel the NPs to cross the inner layer tight junction. The cumulative amounts of NPs penetrating the RWM versus time (M−t curve) indicated that the crossing procedure comprised approximately 3 phases: an active ejection phase, a pseudo-stable state, and a stable state. Moreover, Yi et al. [160] designed a multiple-drug-loaded, tube-type microrobot based on a familiar mechanism. While exposed to US stimulation, perfluorohexane vaporization enables the microtube to behave like a microshotgun, promoting drug delivery to the inner ear. Furthermore, the proportion of drugs entering the inner ear is adjustable.
Injectable hydrogels
Hydrogels are soft, 3-dimensionally crosslinked polymeric networks that have high water content and good biocompatibility, as well as adjustable mechanical strength and pore architecture [161–170]. These features allow hydrogels to be ideal drug carrier systems [171–173]. Among them, injectable hydrogels constitute an important subclass [174]. Beyond drug loading, they remain in a fluid or sol state before or during injection, and rapidly shift to a stable gel in situ under physiological conditions, thereby allowing a fit between the injectable hydrogel and irregular tissue structures [175]. Therefore, injectable hydrogels offer optimum drug delivery systems. When combined with a minimally invasive operation, these systems can effectively preserve delicate inner ear structures. To date, many types of injectable hydrogels, such as CS, GelMA, poloxamer, and silk fibroin (SF), have been widely used in inner ear drug delivery systems.
Chitosan
CS is a linear polysaccharide with good biocompatibility, biodegradability, ease of modification, and nontoxicity [176–180]. CS-based injectable hydrogels, including CS, glycol-CS (GC), and hexanoyl-GC (HGC), have attracted considerable interest as promising candidates for inner ear drug delivery systems. Saber et al. [181] verified the feasibility of CS as a carrier to deliver drugs across the RWM. Subsequent concentration-dependent inner ear damage in albino guinea pigs confirmed the effectiveness of neomycin delivery. Yu et al. [182] identified HGC as a promising thermogel formulation, as well as a solubilizing agent that facilitated DEX inner ear delivery. This thermosensitive system exhibited sustained stability over a period of 21 d and caused no cytotoxicity or inflammation. Phuc Le et al. [175] developed a polymer prodrug GC-DEX to initially enhance drug stability and solubility, and then mixed the GC-DEX with thermogelling polymer HGC, forming the thermosensitive, injectable inner ear drug delivery system HGC/GC-DEX (Fig. 7A). HGC/GC-DEX possesses long-lasting stability, enhancing hearing conditions 7 d after noise exposure.
Gelatin methacryloyl
GelMA is a derivative of gelatin with good biodegradability and biocompatibility, which is injectable and capable of forming hydrogels after polymerization [183–189]. However, a bulk of hydrogel in the middle ear cavity may impede acoustic transmission. Processing it into a drug-loaded microcarrier with microfluidic technique is an effective solution to achieve precise administration [190–197]. Wang et al. [198] prepared a GelMA-based hydrogel microsphere with a diameter of 40 μm, which served as an ideal inner ear drug delivery system for DEX-sodium phosphate (DSP) IT. It was confirmed that about 80% of the microspheres remained on the RWM for 1 week, thereby alleviating damage to the HCs and synaptic ribbons. Besides, considering the limited size of drug delivery systems, a targeted drug delivery system is urgently needed to minimize drug loss. Chen et al. [199] prepared a GelMA-microrobot that realized directional movement and targeted drug delivery via magnetic field control. A sustained and strong protective effect was shown in OHCs, which significantly facilitated hearing recovery. To increase the interfacial contact area between the material and the RWM, Feng et al. [200] novelly prepared a personalized porous GelMA (PGMA) (Fig. 7Bi). Beyond sustained and long-term drug release, nicotinamide-encapsulated PGMA (PGMA@NAM) achieved personalized in situ implantation with the assistance of micro-computed tomography (CT) and reconstruction of the RW niche (Fig. 7Bii). PGMA@NAM administration effectively protected mitochondria within IHCs and significantly alleviated hearing loss, and the ABR threshold measurement presented improvements after noise exposure.
Poloxamer
Poloxamer is a series of synthetic triblock copolymers with the structure poly(ethylene oxide)-b-poly(propylene oxide)-b-poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO-PPO-PEO), which shows temperature-dependent self-assembly property and good biocompatibility [201]. Among all poloxamers, poloxamer 407 has been widely reported for its application in inner ear drug delivery systems. Its cosolvent property allows the sustained release of DEX for about 96 h [202]. While solubility has improved, the sol/gel transition property remains a critical factor in ensuring ideal gelation time and suitable adherence of the poloxamer-based NAC delivery system [203]. In another study, the thermosensitive property prolonged drug retention time to 6 d in a poloxamer 407-based microemulsion gel (MEG) delivery system. Furthermore, along with optimization, this system presents 2 times higher cochlear drug absorption than other groups, thereby providing effective protection against cisplatin-induced damage [204]. Moreover, the combination of poloxamer 407 and USMB increased inner ear DEX delivery efficacy by 109.13% and 66.67% at 1 and 7 d post-administration, respectively [205].
Silk fibroin
SF is the primary component of naturally produced silk fiber, which is also an outstanding bioengineering polymer for its satisfying stability, mechanical strength, and good biocompatibility [206–208]. Owing to these properties, SF is considered a promising biomaterial in inner ear drug delivery systems [209]. For instance, Li et al. [210] developed a poly-L-lysine/SF coating that enables uniform distribution of DEX microcrystals. In addition to SF coating, Yu et al. [211] prepared a PEG-SF hydrogel for micronized DEX (mDEX) delivery, which can maintain perilymph DEX concentration over 100 ng/ml for 10 d, minimizing inflammation and systemic exposure. Xiong et al. [212] developed an SF-based hydrogel, which contained lipoic acid (LA) and DEX microcrystals. After injection, the hydrogel was shown to remain in the inner ear for 14 d and caused no obvious inflammation.
Micropump
A micropump is an ideal reservoir to supply sufficient drugs and achieve precise dose control. Kim et al. [213] developed an advanced reciprocating micropump system that achieves zero net volume liquid transfer, with a reciprocating volume of about 1.5 μl. The operating cycle is initiated by priming the pump with biocompatible solution, which is subsequently infused into the cochlea via the cannula. Following infusion, the device withdraws a portion of the perilymph–drug mixture from the tip of the cannula, as the remaining drug continuously diffuses into the cochlear tissues. For preparing the next administration, diluted drug is moved to the reservoir end, while fresh drug is loaded from the opposite side [213]. Borenstein and coworkers [214] verified the feasibility of their controlled, automated drug delivery reciprocating micropump by dinitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (DNQX) in vivo infusion. Guinea pig compound action potential (CAP) threshold elevation at all frequencies suggests the efficacy of the developed micropump. Forouzandeh et al. [215] novelly reported a nanoliter-scale micropump that achieves pumping by the expansion and contraction of thermal phase-change material, which can sequentially compress the microtube. Resistive heaters and thermistors were arranged in line to provide templates with chambers and microtube grooves, and thermal phase-change paraffin was directly located in those chambers (Fig. 7Ci and ii). To test the feasibility of this micropump as an inner ear drug delivery system, the ototoxic drug sodium salicylate was delivered at a speed of 50 nl/min for 20 min. Systematically increasing distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) shift thresholds suggested the effectiveness of this drug delivery system (Fig. 7Ciii). Moreover, this wirelessly controlled micropump exhibited good biocompatibility, indicating its potential in becoming a hopeful platform for inner ear therapy. Nonimplantable micropumps can also assist in the treatment of hearing loss. During gene delivery, the total injection volume of viral vectors is typically only 1.0 μl [151], and artificial administration may result in reagent loss or even structural damage to the inner ear. Furthermore, precise control over the injection rate is difficult to achieve manually. CMA 102 microdialysis pump was reported to offer a uniform solution at a speed of 10 nl/s [216], thereby ensuring accurate delivery of therapeutic agents.
Ongoing Clinical Trials
Less
The rapid development of engineered inner ear drug delivery systems has accelerated their translation toward clinical application. Numerous clinical trials investigating drug delivery strategies have been completed or are currently ongoing. Discussing about the anti-inflammatory therapeutic agents, the DEX formulation OTO-104 was demonstrated to be effective in alleviating vertigo associated with Ménière’s disease (NCT02717442, NCT02612337, NCT03664674), but only one of these trials showed statistical significance [217]. Ebselen (SPI-1005), a novel drug, has shown potential in reducing temporary threshold shifts and preventing NIHL progression [218]. Beyond anti-inflammatory agents, several neuroprotective, otoprotective, and regenerative therapeutics have also demonstrated promising outcomes. Intratympanic administration of a 0.87 mg/ml gel-formulated N-methyl-d-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptor antagonist, AM-101, has been shown to alleviate tinnitus (NCT01803646) [219]. ORC-13661, a high-affinity permeant blocker of the OHC MET channel derived from PROTO-1, has been shown to reduce the toxicity of aminoglycoside antibiotics [220]. A phase II trial is currently investigating the efficacy of ORC-13661 in preventing hearing loss in patients with nontuberculous mycobacteria infection undergoing amikacin therapy (NCT05730283). Regenerative therapeutics FX-322, the combination of CHIR99021 and valproic acid, has been shown to regenerate mammalian cochlear HCs ex vivo. IT of FX-322 has shown an approximately 10-dB improvement at 8 kHz [221].
Regarding gene therapy, several encouraging advances have recently been reported. The largest global clinical trial on OTOF-related deafness has recently yielded exciting results. Jiang et al. [4] reported that AAV serotype 1 carrying a human OTOF coding transgene (AAV1-hOTOF) presented long-term therapeutic effects among patients aged 0.8 to 32.3 years. Ninety percent of the patients presented hearing recovery during the follow-up 2.5 years; some of the patients could perceive conversational speech, library-level sounds, and even whisper. In 2026, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Otarmeni (lunsotogene parvec-cwha), the first dual-AAV-based gene therapy. After therapy, 80% of the 24 patients (aged from 10 months to 16 years) experienced hearing recovery [5].
Despite these promising advances, clinical outcomes have often been inconsistent or disappointing. The discrepancy between preclinical findings and clinical outcomes remains a critical challenge. Rational participant selection criteria are fundamental to clinical trials, as real clinical patients are more heterogeneous and exhibit greater complexity in terms of age, comorbidities, and medication history. Even when trials are carefully designed, many of them are terminated at phase I/II due to safety concerns, strong placebo effects, and potential immune responses, as well as poor patient adherence during long-term treatment. Furthermore, large-scale manufacturing, quality control, regulatory approval, and clinical implementation collectively pose important challenges to the successful translation of therapeutic strategies into clinical practice.
Challenges and Outlook
Less
Hearing loss has emerged as a global health concern, driving a growing demand for effective therapeutic strategies and stimulating advances in both drug delivery routes and inner ear drug delivery systems. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of inner ear drug delivery is essential for providing patients with convenient and highly efficacious treatments. This review summarizes several drug delivery pathways, commonly used therapeutic agents for inner ear disorders, and recently developed bioengineered delivery systems while also addressing current challenges and limitations in treatment.
Over recent decades, substantial progress has been achieved in the field of inner ear drug delivery. However, several challenges continue to limit the selection of appropriate administration routes. The complex and delicate structure of the inner ear, together with the presence of the BLB, restricts systemic delivery. Considering the BLB heterogeneity in molecular expression, cellular composition, and spatial structure, it is challenging for therapeutic agents to achieve their target site at sufficient concentrations. Shi et al. [222] reported low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 as a promising target for opening the BLB. US-mediated techniques are supposed to enhance the BLB permeabilization by widening its tight junctions [158]. Precise administration routes, including trans-tympanic and intracochlear administration, have also been widely studied to bypass the BLB. However, perilymph pharmacokinetics may lead to uneven drug distribution. For instance, small lipophilic molecules would be eliminated rapidly. As a result, it could only treat basal cochlear regions (high-frequency) of the cochlea and cannot reach the apical regions [223]. Limited RWM permeability, eustachian tube clearance, and limited drug retention time further constrain therapeutic efficacy. Therefore, in addition to selecting appropriate routes of administration, increasing attention has been directed toward the innovation and optimization of drug carriers. NPs are functionalized with targeting ligands or formulated with stimuli-responsive properties (e.g., ROS-responsive, pH-responsive, or thermosensitive) to cross the biological barriers, enabling controlled and sustained drug release at specific sites. Targeting ligands enhance the RWM permeability to NPs and promote cellular uptake [61]. ROS-responsive NPs could cross the RWM via endocytic pathways, enter the perilymph of the basilar membrane, and diffuse longitudinally and laterally. After entering the inner ear, the pH-responsive drug delivery system releases therapeutic agents in response to the pH alterations in the inner ear [105]. Microshotgun techniques have been shown to enhance drug transport across biological barriers via gas generating reactions of self-contained chemicals [159]. Injectable hydrogels are suitable carriers for drugs as well. Their thermosensitive characteristics, along with prolonged retention time, effectively address the limitation of Eustachian tube clearance. As some patients require long-term treatment, or wish to avoid repeated invasive procedures, implantable micropump systems can enable continuous and controlled drug administration. Overall, these advances have facilitated the development of multimodal therapeutic strategies to achieve improved therapeutic effects. For example, drug-loaded hydrogel electrode coatings have been shown to effectively mitigate CI-associated fibrosis [76]. In gene therapy, a DEX gene co-delivery NP has been shown to enhance anti-inflammatory effects and improve gene expression [224]. As AAVs may induce immune responses in mammals, and their limited packaging capacity may compromise therapeutic efficacy, helper-dependent adenoviral vectors were studied to provide larger packaging capacity (36 kb) [225,226]. Collectively, these advances provide promising platforms for the more precise design of inner ear drug delivery systems.
Before applying to humans, these emerging strategies are often first evaluated in rodent models. However, notable anatomical differences exist between humans and rodents (Table 2) [227]. First, the smaller TM size and tympanic cavity volume in rodents result in a higher relative drug concentration following intratympanic administration, facilitating rapid diffusion toward the RW. Second, rodents typically exhibit a relatively larger RWM, promoting efficient drug entry into the inner ear. Third, the small cochlear volume in rodents allows for rapid equilibration and relatively uniform drug distribution. Besides differences between humans and rodents, patient-specific factors should also be taken into consideration. Age is an important determinant of treatment strategy. Anesthetic risk should be considered, especially for pediatric and geriatric patients. Additionally, age-related changes may require highly precise administration in elderly patients. As noted above, pathological heterogeneity across inner ear disorders necessitates distinct therapeutic targets and strategies. Moreover, a thorough understanding of concomitant medications is critical. Patients receiving anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy may require minimally invasive approaches to avoid bleeding risks, whereas those undergoing ototoxic chemotherapy may benefit from localized delivery strategies that minimize interference with systemic treatment.
Overall, in order to achieve precise therapy, we need to take both timely diagnosis and personalized administration into consideration. Hearing loss is typically assessed using audiologic testing, with pure-tone audiometry evaluating tone detection across a range of frequencies and indicating the hearing loss category. Additionally, genetic testing is crucial for newborn hearing screening. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has detected GJB2, SLC26A4, mtDNA, and GJB3 genes and found that 195 of 1907 (10.22%) are carriers of the deafness gene, which offers the possibility for timely therapy [228]. Regarding imaging studies, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may achieve visualization of endolymphatic hydrops in Ménière’s disease patients [49]. Considering the selection of therapeutic agents, a clear understanding of weather the patients have ototoxicity medication history or operation history is of great importance. Corticosteroid intervention within 2 weeks and intratympanic steroid therapy are recommended once symptoms appear [229]. Nevertheless, the low solubility of DEX limits its administration at low concentrations, and DSP-loaded GelMA-NPs can help overcome this limitation [198]. Moreover, limited residence time and reduced therapeutic exposure require repeated administration or hydrogel-based sustained-release systems.
Since these novel delivery systems move toward clinical translation, alignment with regulatory requirements is increasingly important. Regarding clinical trial application (CTA), different countries and regions have established their own regulatory standards. For instance, investigational new drug (IND) submissions are requiring support from a comprehensive preclinical evidence package. Such a package should include detailed animal pharmacology and toxicology studies, manufacturing information, and clinical protocols and investigator information [230]. Therefore, a clear understanding of the delivery system classification of these regulatory requirements is essential to facilitate successful clinical translation. Regarding the delivery system itself, for instance, when therapeutic agents are combined with intracochlear devices, it could be seen as a combination product. Federal Register (FR) has clearly classified different types of products [231]. In inner ear drug delivery systems, there are basically drug–device combinations (DEX-coating cochlear implants) and biologic–device combinations (stem cell-coated electrode) [232,233]. However, the cochlea is a surgically inaccessible end-organ, which limits repeated biopsy and direct histological evaluation. FDA has already classified CI into class III, reflecting their high-risk nature and the requirement for premarket approval [234]. This indicates that the combination product would go through strict assessment premarketing. In addition, the Office of Combination Products (OCP) designates the appropriate FDA medical product center to conduct the review of combination products and ensures the continued safety and quality of combination products through oversight of post-market activities [235].
Overall, several key considerations should guide the future development of inner ear drug delivery systems. Biocompatibility and stability remain fundamental requirements for diverse delivery platforms. Prodrug strategies offer potential for improved therapeutic efficacy, while controlled release mechanisms must be optimized to ensure sustained drug delivery rather than an initial burst release. Furthermore, the translatability of animal studies to human applications requires careful consideration. Addressing these challenges will be crucial for developing the next generation of innovative inner ear drug delivery systems, particularly through the integration of multimodal strategies and precision medicine approaches.
References
Less
1.
Carlson ML.Cochlear implantation in adults. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(16):1531–1542.
2.
Zeng F-G, Qi J, Wu C-C, Shu Y, Chai R.Treating hearing loss: From Cochlear implantation to gene therapy. Adv Sci. 2025;12(41):Article e09960.
3.
Yi Z, Wang X, Yin G, Sun Y.The blood-labyrinth barrier: Non-invasive delivery strategies for inner ear drug delivery. Pharmaceutics. 2025;17(4):482.
4.
Jiang L, Cheng X, Lv J, Chen Y, Chen X, Zhai R, Zhang L, Han L, Zhang Y, Zhang J, et al.Multicentre gene therapy for OTOF-related deafness followed up to 2.5 years. Nature. 2026;653(8116):1170–1177.
5.
FDA. FDA approves first-ever gene therapy for treatment of genetic hearing loss under national priority voucher program. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-ever-gene-therapy-treatment-genetic-hearing-loss-under-national-priority-voucher
6.
Zhang L, Wang H, Xun M, Tang H, Wang J, Lv J, Zhu B, Chen Y, Wang D, Hu S, et al.Preclinical evaluation of the efficacy and safety of AAV1-hOTOF in mice and nonhuman primates. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2023;31:Article 101154.
7.
Zhang L, Tan F, Qi J, Lu Y, Wang X, Yang X, Chen X, Zhang X, Fan J, Zhou Y, et al.AAV-mediated gene therapy for hereditary deafness: Progress and perspectives. Adv Sci. 2024;11(47):Article 2402166.
8.
Kim D-K.Recent advances in functionalized nanoparticles for targeted and controlled inner ear therapy via localized cochlear delivery. J Audiol Otol. 2025;29(3):159–165.
9.
Salt AN, Hirose K.Communication pathways to and from the inner ear and their contributions to drug delivery. Hear Res. 2018;362:25–37.
10.
Li L, Chao T, Brant J, O’Malley B, Tsourkas A, Li D.Advances in nano-based inner ear delivery systems for the treatment of sensorineural hearing loss. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017;108:2–12.
11.
Delaney DS, Liew LJ, Lye J, Atlas MD, Wong EYM.Overcoming barriers: A review on innovations in drug delivery to the middle and inner ear. Front Pharmacol. 2023;14:Article 1207141.
12.
Thomson S, Madani G.The windows of the inner ear. Clin Radiol. 2014;69(3):e146–e152.
13.
Kishimoto-Urata M, Urata S, Fujimoto C, Yamasoba T.Role of oxidative stress and antioxidants in acquired inner ear disorders. Antioxidants. 2022;11(8):1469.
14.
Hibino H, Kurachi Y.Molecular and physiological bases of the K+ circulation in the mammalian inner ear. Physiology. 2006;21(5):336–345.
15.
Zhao X, Shen T, Cao S, Liu Z, Pang W, Li M, Liu J, Li W, Wu Y, Liu C, et al.Presbycusis: Pathology, signal pathways, and therapeutic strategy. Adv Sci. 2025;12(29):Article 2410413.
16.
Maimaitikelimu X, Xuan Z, Ren H, Chen K, Zhang H, Wang H.Rational design of inner ear drug delivery systems. Adv Sci. 2025;12(29):Article 2410568.
17.
Nyberg S, Abbott NJ, Shi X, Steyger PS, Dabdoub A.Delivery of therapeutics to the inner ear: The challenge of the blood-labyrinth barrier. Sci Transl Med. 2019;11(482):eaao0935.
18.
Kim GS, Wang T, Sayyid ZN, Fuhriman J, Jones SM, Cheng AG.Repair of surviving hair cells in the damaged mouse utricle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2022;119(15):Article e2116973119.
19.
Kim SH, Nam GS, Choi JY.Pathophysiologic findings in the human endolymphatic sac in endolymphatic hydrops: Functional and molecular evidence. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2019;128(6_suppl):76S–83S.
20.
Smith CM, Curthoys IS, Mukherjee P, Wong C, Laitman JT.Three-dimensional visualization of the human membranous labyrinth: The membrana Limitans and its role in vestibular form. Anat Rec. 2022;305(5):1037–1050.
21.
Xu K, Xu B, Gu J, Wang X, Yu D, Chen Y.Intrinsic mechanism and pharmacologic treatments of noise-induced hearing loss. Theranostics. 2023;13(11):3524–3549.
22.
Münzel T, Daiber A, Steven S, Tran LP, Ullmann E, Kossmann S, Schmidt FP, Oelze M, Xia N, Li H, et al.Effects of noise on vascular function, oxidative stress, and inflammation: Mechanistic insight from studies in mice. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(37):2838–2849.
23.
Pan J, Wang K, Qu J, Chen D, Chen A, You Y, Tang J, Zhang H.Activated tissue-resident macrophages contribute to hair cell insults in noise-induced hearing loss in mice. Commun Biol. 2024;7(1):1078.
24.
Wang Z, Yang B.Pro-aging metabolic reprogramming: A unified theory of aging. Engineering. 2025;44:37–43.
25.
Suzuki Y, Hayashi K, Goto F, Nomura Y, Fujimoto C, Makishima M.Premature senescence is regulated by crosstalk among TFEB, the autophagy lysosomal pathway and ROS derived from damaged mitochondria in NaAsO2-exposed auditory cells. Cell Death Discov. 2024;10(1):382.
26.
Pang J, Xiong H, Ou Y, Yang H, Xu Y, Chen S, Lai L, Ye Y, Su Z, Lin H, et al.SIRT1 protects cochlear hair cell and delays age-related hearing loss via autophagy. Neurobiol Aging. 2019;80:127–137.
27.
Li X-J, Doetzlhofer A.LIN28B/let-7 control the ability of neonatal murine auditory supporting cells to generate hair cells through mTOR signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117(36):22225–22236.
28.
Fetoni AR, Zorzi V, Paciello F, Ziraldo G, Peres C, Raspa M, Scavizzi F, Salvatore AM, Crispino G, Tognola G, et al.Cx26 partial loss causes accelerated presbycusis by redox imbalance and dysregulation of Nfr2 pathway. Redox Biol. 2018;19:301–317.
29.
Sun F, Zhou K, Tian KY, Zhang XY, Liu W, Wang J, Zhong CP, Qiu JH, Zha DJ.Atrial natriuretic peptide promotes neurite outgrowth and survival of cochlear spiral ganglion neurons in vitro through NPR-A/cGMP/PKG signaling. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:Article 681421.
30.
He W, Han S, Liu X, Huang X, Yang W, Tang X, Dong C, Fan J.Update on gene therapy in the treatment of hereditary hearing loss. Sens Neurosci. 2025;1(2):Article e70004.
31.
Jiang L, Wang D, He Y, Shu Y.Advances in gene therapy hold promise for treating hereditary hearing loss. Mol Ther. 2023;31(4):934–950.
32.
Qi J, Tan F, Zhang L, Lu L, Zhang S, Zhai Y, Lu Y, Qian X, Dong W, Zhou Y, et al.AAV-mediated gene therapy restores hearing in patients with DFNB9 deafness. Adv Sci. 2024;11(11):Article 2306788.
33.
Hu SW, Lv J, Wang Z, Tang H, Wang H, Wang F, Wang D, Zhang J, Zhang L, Cao Q, et al.Engineering of the AAV-compatible hair cell-specific small-size Myo15 promoter for gene therapy in the inner ear. Research. 2024;7:0341.
34.
Xie F, Liu X, Wang L, Zhang C, Liu C, Huo Z, Zhao Z, Zhao Q, He Q, Guo K, et al.A porcine congenital deafness model with unconditional knockout of GJB2 generated by CRISPR/Cas9 genomic editing. Hear Res. 2026;472:Article 109552.
35.
Estivill X, Fortina P, Surrey S, Rabionet R, Melchionda S, D’Agruma L, Mansfield E, Rappaport E, Govea N, Milà M, et al.Connexin-26 mutations in sporadic and inherited sensorineural deafness. Lancet. 1998;351(9100):394–398.
36.
Liu X, Xie L, Jin Y, Chen S, Shi X, Zong Y, Zhao Z, Kong W-J, Sun Y.Connexin 26 functions as a direct transcriptional regulator during the cochlea development. Adv Sci. 2026;13(14):Article e14136.
37.
Yan L, Zhang Y, Wei Y, Zhu Y, Du J, Cheng N, Xiao Y, Xu Y, Guo L, Shao B, et al.Advances in understanding the pathogenesis of sensorineural hearing loss: Treatment strategies and implications for auditory protection. Sens Neurosci. 2025;1(1):Article e5.
38.
Tsai Y-H, Wu P-Y, Chuang Y-C, Huang C-Y, Takeda H, Hibino H, Wu C-C, Cheng Y-F.Postnatal SLC26A4 gene therapy improves hearing and structural integrity in a hereditary hearing loss model. J Clin Invest. 2026;136(8):Article e193812.
39.
Mauriac SA, Lee J, Zhang J, Jin J, Nist-Lund C, Martin CT, Von Muhlenbrock CR, O’Malley S, Chaves MG, Madison MA, et al.AAV-mediated exon skipping therapy for usher syndrome, type 2A. Mol Ther. 2026;34(1):179–202.
40.
Crane R, Tebbe L, Mwoyosvi ML, Al-Ubaidi MR, Naash MI.Expression of the human usherin c.2299delG mutation leads to early-onset auditory loss and stereocilia disorganization. Commun Biol. 2023;6(1):933.
41.
Kim J, Ricci AJ.In vivo real-time imaging reveals Megalin as the aminoglycoside gentamicin transporter into cochlea whose inhibition is otoprotective. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2022;119(9):Article e2117946119.
42.
Esterberg R, Linbo T, Pickett SB, Wu P, Ou HC, Rubel EW, Raible DW.Mitochondrial calcium uptake underlies ROS generation during aminoglycoside-induced hair cell death. J Clin Invest. 2016;126(9):3556–3566.
43.
Chen B, Cheng C, Wu Y, Li S, Han M, Zhen L, Peng Y, Guo S, Shen K, Gao X, et al.PGC-1α-mediated imbalance of mitochondria-lipid droplet homeostasis in neomycin-induced ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2024;14(10):4413–4430.
44.
Wang X, Zhou Y, Wang D, Wang Y, Zhou Z, Ma X, Liu X, Dong Y.Cisplatin-induced ototoxicity: From signaling network to therapeutic targets. Biomed Pharmacother. 2023;157:Article 114045.
45.
Smith MD, Seleme MC, Marquez-Lago T, Chen J-W, Mach M, Britt WJ.Early control of cochlear viral load limits cochlear inflammation and prevents virus-induced sensorineural hearing loss. J Neuroinflammation. 2025;22(1):92.
46.
Geyer H, Bauer M, Neumann J, Lüdde A, Rennert P, Friedrich N, Claus C, Perelygina L, Mankertz A.Gene expression profiling of rubella virus infected primary endothelial cells of fetal and adult origin. Virol J. 2016;13(1):21.
47.
Sun S, Yu S, Yu H, Yao G, Guo X, Zhao F, Li J, Wang P.The pyroptosis mechanism of ototoxicity caused by unconjugated bilirubin in neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Biomed Pharmacother. 2023;165:Article 115162.
48.
Momin SR, Melki SJ, Alagramam KN, Megerian CA.Spiral ganglion loss outpaces inner hair cell loss in endolymphatic hydrops. Laryngoscope. 2010;120(1):159–165.
49.
Nakashima T, Pyykkö I, Arroll MA, Casselbrant ML, Foster CA, Manzoor NF, Megerian CA, Naganawa S, Young YH.Meniere’s disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2(1):16028.
50.
Li X, Wang H, Wang J, Duan M, Lyu Y.Inner ear immunity and audio-vestibular dysfunction. Sens Neurosci. 2025;1(1):Article e7.
51.
Zhang Z, Li X, Zhang W, Kohane DS.Drug delivery across barriers to the middle and inner ear. Adv Funct Mater. 2021;31(44):Article 2008701.
52.
Zou J, Hannula M, Misra S, Feng H, Labrador RH, Aula AS, Hyttinen J, Pyykkö I.Micro CT visualization of silver nanoparticles in the middle and inner ear of rat and transportation pathway after transtympanic injection. J Nanobiotechnology. 2015;13(1):5.
53.
Grewal AS, Nedzelski JM, Chen JM, Lin VYW.Dexamethasone uptake in the murine organ of Corti with transtympanic versus systemic administration. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;42(1):19.
54.
Li Y, Kanzaki S, Shibata S, Nakamura M, Ozaki M, Okano H, Ogawa K.Comparison of drug availability in the inner ear after oral, transtympanic, and combined administration. Front Neurol. 2021;12:Article 641593.
55.
Liu Y-C, Chi F-H, Yang T-H, Liu T-C.Assessment of complications due to Intratympanic injections. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;2(1):13–16.
56.
Voruz F, Feng SJ, Breil E, Yu M, Hammer DR, Aksit A, Zandkarimi F, Olson ES, Kysar JW, Lalwani AK.Microneedle-mediated Intracochlear injection safely achieves higher perilymphatic dexamethasone concentration than Intratympanic delivery in guinea pig. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2025;15(10):3595–3606.
57.
Chin OY, Diaz RC.State-of-the-art methods in clinical Intracochlear drug delivery. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;27(5):381–386.
58.
Gunewardene N, Ma Y, Lam P, Wagstaff S, Cortez-Jugo C, Hu Y, Caruso F, Richardson RT, Wise AK.Developing the supraparticle technology for round window-mediated drug administration into the cochlea. J Control Release. 2023;361:621–635.
59.
Ding Y, Hou Z, Wang M, Xu L, Wang H.Mastoid approach for local drug delivery to the inner ear for treating hearing loss. J Control Release. 2024;376:488–501.
60.
Talaei S, Schnee ME, Aaron KA, Ricci AJ.Dye tracking following posterior semicircular canal or round window membrane injections suggests a role for the cochlea aqueduct in modulating distribution. Front Cell Neurosci. 2019;13:471.
61.
Wang X, Zhou Z, Yu C, He K, Sun L, Kou Y, Zhang M, Zhang Z, Luo P, Wen L, et al.A Prestin-targeting peptide-guided drug delivery system rearranging concentration gradient in the inner ear: An improved strategy against hearing loss. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2023;187:Article 106490.
62.
Lee J, Nist-Lund C, Solanes P, Goldberg H, Wu J, Pan B, Schneider BL, Holt JR.Efficient viral transduction in mouse inner ear hair cells with utricle injection and AAV9-PHP.B. Hear Res. 2020;394:Article 107882.
63.
Kim J, Maldonado J, Pan DW, Quiñones PM, Zenteno S, Oghalai JS, Ricci AJ.Semicircular canal drug delivery safely targets the inner ear perilymphatic space. JCI Insight. 2024;9(21):Article e173052.
64.
Basura GJ, Lin GC, Telian SA.Comparison of second-echelon treatments for Ménière’s disease. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;140(8):754–761.
65.
Kim J, Ricci AJ.A chemo-mechanical cochleostomy preserves hearing for the in vivo functional imaging of cochlear cells. Nat Protoc. 2023;18(4):1137–1154.
66.
Mowry SE, Woodson E.Cochlear implant surgery. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;146(1):92.
67.
Fan X, Gao Z, Zhong J, Chen Y, Chen X, Landegger LD, Moser T, Zeng F-G, Sun Y, Jin X, et al.International expert consensus on gene therapy for hereditary hearing loss: Based on clinical trials. Med. 2026;7(1):Article 100886.
68.
Nieratschker M, Liepins R, Honeder C, Auinger AB, Gausterer JC, Baumgartner WD, Riss D, Arnoldner C, Dahm V.A single Intratympanic triamcinolone acetonide administration elicits long-term reduction in impedances following cochlear implantation. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024;53:1-9.
69.
Mertens G, Van Rompaey V, Van de Heyning P, Gorris E, Topsakal V.Prediction of the cochlear implant electrode insertion depth: Clinical applicability of two analytical cochlear models. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):3340.
70.
Starovoyt A, Quirk BC, Putzeys T, Kerckhofs G, Nuyts J, Wouters J, RA ML, Verhaert N.An optically-guided cochlear implant sheath for real-time monitoring of electrode insertion into the human cochlea. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):19234.
71.
Gnansia D, Demarcy T, Vandersteen C, Raffaelli C, Guevara N, Delingette H, Ayache N.Optimal electrode diameter in relation to volume of the cochlea. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2016;133:S66–S67.
72.
Itawi A, Zribi B, Sidambaram P, Tran TH, Tourrel G, Torres R, Ghenna S, Grondel S, Nguyen Y, Plesse C, et al.Steerable thin-film electrode array for cochlear implantation: Design and development for future atraumatic insertion. Sens Actuators Rep. 2026;11:Article 100447.
73.
Plontke SK, Götze G, Rahne T, Liebau A.Intracochlear drug delivery in combination with cochlear implants: Current aspects. HNO. 2017;65(1 Suppl):19–28.
74.
Jensen MJ, Claussen AD, Higgins T, Vielman-Quevedo R, Mostaert B, Xu L, Kirk J, Hansen MR.Cochlear implant material effects on inflammatory cell function and foreign body response. Hear Res. 2022;426:Article 108597.
75.
Lin X, Li J, Wang J, Filppula AM, Zhang H, Zhao Y.Ion-specific hydrogel microcarriers with biomimetic niches for bioartifical liver system. Adv Funct Mater. 2024;34(39):2402999.
76.
Horne R, Ben-Shlomo N, Jensen M, Ellerman M, Escudero C, Hua R, Bennion D, Guymon CA, Hansen MR.Reducing the foreign body response on human cochlear implants and their materials in vivo with photografted zwitterionic hydrogel coatings. Acta Biomater. 2023;166:212–223.
77.
Ren L, Hu Y, Ding X, Liao M, Shen T, Cao S, Zhang H, Cheng H, Qi Y, Feng P, et al.Multicargo porous cochlear electrode coating for antifibrosis after cochlear implantation. Adv Sci. 2025;12(21):2412158.
78.
de Rijk SR, Boys AJ, Roberts IV, Jiang C, Garcia C, Owens RM, Bance M.Tissue-engineered cochlear fibrosis model links complex impedance to fibrosis formation for cochlear implant patients. Adv Healthc Mater. 2023;12(24):2300732.
79.
Matsui H, Lopez IA, Ishiyama G, Ishiyama A.Immunohistochemical localization of glucocorticoid receptors in the human cochlea. Brain Res. 2023;1806:Article 148301.
80.
Lee JH, Oh SH, Kim TH, Go YY, Song J-J.Anti-apoptotic effect of dexamethasone in an ototoxicity model. Biomater Res. 2017;21(1):4.
81.
Valente F, Simoni E, Gentilin E, Martini A, Zanoletti E, Marioni G, Nicolai P, Astolfi L.Liquid crystalline nanoparticles conjugated with dexamethasone prevent cisplatin ototoxicity in vitro. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(23):14881.
82.
Yang K-J, Son J, Jung SY, Yi G, Yoo J, Kim D-K, Koo H.Optimized phospholipid-based nanoparticles for inner ear drug delivery and therapy. Biomaterials. 2018;171:133–143.
83.
Mustafa RA, Wang J, Xun M, Rosenholm JM, Wang W, Shu Y, Zhang H.Programmable NIR responsive nanocomposite enables noninvasive Intratympanic delivery of dexamethasone to reverse cisplatin-induced hearing loss. Adv Sci. 2025;12(24):2407067.
84.
Zhang W, Cai L, Gan J, Zhao Y.Photothermal responsive porous hollow microneedles as Chinese medicine versatile delivery system for wound healing. Smart Med. 2024;3(3):Article e20240007.
85.
Zheng C, Wu X, Liu M, Lan Y, Liu Q, Cai E, Liao Z, Shen J.Photothermal-enhanced in situ supramolecular hydrogel promotes bacteria-infected wound healing in diabetes. Smart Med. 2024;3(1):Article e20230047.
86.
Chen C-H, Huang C-Y, Lin H-YH, Wang M-C, Chang C-Y, Cheng Y-F.Association of sodium thiosulfate with risk of ototoxic effects from platinum-based chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(8):e2118895.
87.
Brock PR, Maibach R, Childs M, Rajput K, Roebuck D, Sullivan MJ, Laithier V, Ronghe M, Dall’Igna P, Hiyama E, et al.Sodium thiosulfate for protection from cisplatin-induced hearing loss. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(25):2376–2385.
88.
Wang L, Ahn YJ, Asmis R.Sexual dimorphism in glutathione metabolism and glutathione-dependent responses. Redox Biol. 2020;31:Article 101410.
89.
Kim S-J, Ho Hur J, Park C, Kim H-J, Oh G-S, Lee JN, Yoo S-J, Choe S-K, So H-S, Lim DJ, et al.Bucillamine prevents cisplatin-induced ototoxicity through induction of glutathione and antioxidant genes. Exp Mol Med. 2015;47(2):e142.
90.
Gut P, Lizzo G, Migliavacca E, Karagounis L, Heise T, Eynatten M.Effects of glycine and N-acetylcysteine on glutathione levels and mitochondrial energy metabolism in healthy aging. Innov Aging. 2021;5(Supplement_1):689–690.
91.
Wang W, Chen E, Ding X, Lu P, Chen J, Ma P, Lu L.N-acetylcysteine protects inner hair cells from cisplatin by alleviating cellular oxidative stress and apoptosis. Toxicol Vitro. 2022;81:Article 105354.
92.
Kil J, Lobarinas E, Spankovich C, Griffiths SK, Antonelli PJ, Lynch ED, Le Prell CG.Safety and efficacy of ebselen for the prevention of noise-induced hearing loss: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2017;390(10098):969–979.
93.
Chen K, Wang F, Ding R, Cai Z, Zou T, Zhang A, Guo D, Ye B, Cui W, Xiang M.Adhesive and injectable hydrogel microspheres for inner ear treatment. Small. 2022;18(36):2106591.
94.
Wang W, Qiu S, Zhang T, Zheng Z, Zhu K, Gao X, Zhao F, Ma X, Lin H, He Y, et al.Quantum chemistry calculation-aided discovery of potent small-molecule mimics of glutathione peroxidases for the treatment of cisplatin-induced hearing loss. Eur J Med Chem. 2024;271:Article 116404.
95.
Najafi N, Mehri S, Ghasemzadeh Rahbardar M, Hosseinzadeh H.Effects of alpha lipoic acid on metabolic syndrome: A comprehensive review. Phytother Res. 2022;36(6):2300–2323.
96.
Chen H, Zhang H, Li J, Wei X, Yu C, Zhao Y, Duan M, Qian X, Gao X.Polydopamine nanohydrogel decorated adhesive and responsive hierarchical microcarriers for deafness protection. Adv Sci. 2025;12(29):Article 2407637.
97.
Kim K-H, Lee B, Kim Y-R, Kim M-A, Ryu N, Jung DJ, Kim U-K, Baek J-I, Lee K-Y.Evaluating protective and therapeutic effects of alpha-lipoic acid on cisplatin-induced ototoxicity. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(8):827.
98.
Jung SY, Yoo J, Yang KJ, Jang SY, Yi G, Kim DK, Koo H.Intratympanic administration of alpha-lipoic acid-loaded pluronic F-127 nanoparticles ameliorates acute hearing loss. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med. 2021;32:Article 102329.
99.
Xu B, Wang G, Xu L, Ding L, Li S, Han Y.Vitamin C ameliorates D-galactose-induced senescence in HEI-OC1 cells by inhibiting the ROS/NF-κB pathway. Mol Biol Rep. 2024;51(1):1157.
100.
Liu J, Si Y, Huang X, Lin X, Lu L, Wu C, Guan X, Liang Y.Vitamin C inhibits NLRP3 Inflammasome activation and delays the development of age-related hearing loss in male C57BL/6 mice. Neurosci Lett. 2024;836:Article 137897.
101.
Alvarado JC, Fuentes-Santamaría V, Melgar-Rojas P, Gabaldón-Ull MC, Cabanes-Sanchis JJ, Juiz JM.Oral antioxidant vitamins and magnesium limit noise-induced hearing loss by promoting sensory hair cell survival: Role of antioxidant enzymes and apoptosis genes. Antioxidants. 2020;9(12):1177.
102.
Donoso A, González-Durán J, Muñoz AA, González PA, Agurto-Muñoz C.Therapeutic uses of natural astaxanthin: An evidence-based review focused on human clinical trials. Pharmacol Res. 2021;166:Article 105479.
103.
Nan B, Zhao Z, Jiang K, Gu X, Li H, Huang X.Astaxanthine attenuates cisplatin ototoxicity in vitro and protects against cisplatin-induced hearing loss in vivo. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2022;12(1):167–181.
104.
Gu J, Wang X, Chen Y, Xu K, Yu D, Wu H.An enhanced antioxidant strategy of astaxanthin encapsulated in ROS-responsive nanoparticles for combating cisplatin-induced ototoxicity. J Nanobiotechnol. 2022;20(1):268.
105.
Xiao W, He K, Yu C, Zhou Z, Xia L, Xie S, Li H, Zhang M, Zhang Z, Luo P, et al.Space station-like composite nanoparticles for co-delivery of multiple natural compounds from Chinese medicine and hydrogen in combating sensorineural hearing loss. Mol Pharm. 2023;20(8):3987–4006.
106.
Zhao Z, Han Z, Naveena K, Lei G, Qiu S, Li X, Li T, Shi X, Zhuang W, Li Y, et al.ROS-responsive nanoparticle as a berberine carrier for OHC-targeted therapy of noise-induced hearing loss. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13(6):7102–7114.
107.
Kim Y-R, Baek J-I, Lee K-Y, Kim U-K.Berberine chloride protects cochlear hair cells from aminoglycoside-induced ototoxicity by reducing the accumulation of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species. Free Radic Biol Med. 2023;204:177–183.
108.
Chen F, Jiang Q, Xu B, Huang Y, Xu K, Xu X, Yu D, Chen Y, Wang X.Ototoxicity-alleviating and cytoprotective allomelanin nanomedicine for efficient sensorineural hearing loss treatment. ACS Nano. 2024;18(38):26401–26418.
109.
Geng X, Zhang N, Li Z, Zhao M, Zhang H, Li J.Iron-doped nanozymes with spontaneous peroxidase-mimic activity as a promising antibacterial therapy for bacterial keratitis. Smart Med. 2024;3(2):Article e20240004.
110.
Li L, Zhang J, Yan C, Wen Y, Jia L, Tang X, Yong Y, Jiang K, Yang H, Chen L, et al.Manganese-based polyoxometalate nanozyme-metformin co-functionalized hydrogel promotes diabetic wound regeneration by enhancing phagocyte efferocytosis. Research. 2025;8:0964.
111.
Chen Y, Liang Y, Shen J, Wang Y, Qiu B, Hou H, Qiu X.A NADH oxidase nanozyme restores redox homeostasis to ameliorate multi-organ aging and ischemic cardiomyopathy. Research. 2025;8:0973.
112.
Huo Q, Chen C, Liao J, Zeng Q, Nie G, Zhang B.Application of self-assembly palladium single-atom nanozyme over polyoxometalates in protection against neomycin-induced hearing loss by inhibiting ferroptosis. Biomaterials. 2024;311:Article 122665.
113.
Ge S, Sun A, Zhou X, Niu P, Chen Y, Bao X, Yu M, Zhong Z, Sun J, Li G.Functionalized nanozyme microcapsules targeting deafness prevention via mitochondrial homeostasis remodeling. Adv Mater. 2025;37(5):2413371.
114.
Pisani A, Rolesi R, Mohamed-Hizam V, Montuoro R, Paludetti G, Giorgio C, Cocchiaro P, Brandolini L, Detta N, Sirico A, et al.Transtympanic administration of rhBDNF exerts a multifaceted neuroprotective effect against cisplatin-induced hearing loss. Br J Pharmacol. 2025;182(3):546–563.
115.
Fritzsch B, Silos-Santiago I, Bianchi LM, Fariñas I.The role of neurotrophic factors in regulating the development of inner ear innervation. Trends Neurosci. 1997;20(4):159–164.
116.
Wang J, Youngblood R, Cassinotti L, Skoumal M, Corfas G, Shea L.An injectable PEG hydrogel controlling neurotrophin-3 release by affinity peptides. J Control Release. 2021;330:575–586.
117.
Zhao Z, Han Z, Shao Y, Naveena K, Yuan J, Zhou N, Wang C, Li X, Shi X, Jin D, et al.A OHCs-targeted strategy for PEDF delivery in noise-induced hearing loss. Adv Healthc Mater. 2025;14(7):2403537.
118.
Wang H, Zhang H, Bian F, Zhang D, Gu H, Kong B.Bioinspired bioassay platforms derived from colloidal crystals with topological shapes. Aggregate. 2024;5(2):Article e467.
119.
Cong B, Li L, Wang Q, He T, Li J, Xie H, Zhang A, Fan X.Cellular chemical field and cellular homeostasis. Engineering. 2024;39:18–24.
120.
Qi R, Wang S, Yu J, Lu T, Bi Z, Liu W, Guo Y, Bian Y, Shen J, Zhang X, et al.Enhanced precision therapy of multiple myeloma through engineered biomimetic nanoparticles with dual targeting. Engineering. 2024;36:178–192.
121.
Wang H, Liu Y, Chen Z, Sun L, Zhao Y.Anisotropic structural color particles from colloidal phase separation. Sci Adv. 2020;6(2):eaay1438.
122.
Wang H, Cai L, Zhang D, Shang L, Zhao Y.Responsive Janus structural color hydrogel micromotors for label-free multiplex assays. Research. 2021;2021:9829068.
123.
Wang H, Zhang H, Zhang D, Wang J, Tan H, Kong T.Enzyme-functionalized structural color hydrogel particles for urea detection and elimination. J Clean Prod. 2021;315:Article 128149.
124.
Su H, Ren H, Maimaitikelimu X, Xu J, Bian F, Wang H.Molecularly and Ionically imprinted polymers-based chemical sensors in chemical assays. Chem Eng J. 2024;499:Article 156315.
125.
Zhang H, Xu D, Zhang B, Li X, Li M, Zhang C, Wang H, Zhao Y, Chai R.PEDOT-integrated fish swim bladders as conductive nerve conduits. Adv Sci. 2024;11(31):2400827.
126.
Chamundeeswari M, Jeslin J, Verma ML.Nanocarriers for drug delivery applications. Environ Chem Lett. 2019;17(2):849–865.
127.
Wang N, Cheng X, Li N, Wang H, Chen H.Nanocarriers and their loading strategies. Adv Healthc Mater. 2019;8(6):Article e1801002.
128.
Zhang B, Tang G, He J, Yan X, Fan K.Ferritin nanocage: A promising and designable multi-module platform for constructing dynamic nanoassembly-based drug nanocarrier. Adv Drug Del Rev. 2021;176:Article 113892.
129.
Zhang L, Xu Y, Cao W, Xie S, Wen L, Chen G.Understanding the translocation mechanism of PLGA nanoparticles across round window membrane into the inner ear: A guideline for inner ear drug delivery based on nanomedicine. Int J Nanomedicine. 2018;13:479–492.
130.
Li P, Yang Y, Wang Y, Zheng J, Chen F, Jiang M, Chou CK, Cong W, Li Z, Chen X.Anti-TNFR2 antibody-conjugated PLGA nanoparticles for targeted delivery of adriamycin in mouse colon cancer. Research. 2024;7:0444.
131.
Ma P-W, Lu P-H, Yuan H, Chen J-W, Gao W, Lun Y-Q, Guo J-N, Ding X-R, Liang R, Li S-Y, et al.Ferrostatin-1-loaded thermosensitive nanodelivery system for noise-induced hearing loss treatment. Chem Eng J. 2023;476:Article 146584.
132.
Su H, Zhang H, Zhang D, Wang H, Wang H.Black phosphorus-loaded inverse opal microspheres for intelligent drug delivery. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2024;92:Article 105374.
133.
Wang H, Gu H, Chen Z, Shang L, Zhao Z, Gu Z, Zhao Y.Enzymatic inverse opal hydrogel particles for biocatalyst. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(15):12914–12918.
134.
Su H, Ren H, Xuan Z, Maimaitikelimu X, Fang Y, Wang H, Wang H.Magnetic structural color microspheres for the multiplex detection of acute kidney injury biomarkers. Anal Chim Acta. 2025;1346:Article 343767.
135.
Chen A, Chen Y, Liu S, Ma D, Tang J, Zhang H.Mesoporous silica nanoparticle-modified electrode arrays of cochlear implants for delivery of siRNA-TGFβ1 into the inner ear. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2022;218:Article 112753.
136.
Hessvik NP, Llorente A.Current knowledge on exosome biogenesis and release. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2018;75(2):193–208.
137.
Cocozza F, Grisard E, Martin-Jaular L, Mathieu M, Théry C.SnapShot: Extracellular vesicles. Cell. 2020;182(1):262–262.e1.
138.
Liu X, Wang X, Li J, Zhao Z, Liu Y, Li X, Wang W, Wang Q, Sun X, Guo M, et al.Cabbage exosome-like nanoparticles encapsulating small noncoding tsRNA prevent postinjury arterial restenosis. Research. 2025;8:1019.
139.
Li M, Liu R, Chen G, Wang H, Wang J, Kong B, Yu C.Mesenchymal stem cell exosome-integrated antibacterial hydrogels for nasal mucosal injury treatment. Research. 2024;7:0469.
140.
Hao F, Shan C, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Jia Z.Exosomes derived from MicroRNA-21 overexpressing neural progenitor cells prevent hearing loss from ischemia-reperfusion injury in mice via inhibiting the inflammatory process in the cochlea. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2022;13(16):2464–2472.
141.
Wang X, Zhang D, Singh YP, Yeo M, Deng G, Lai J, Chen F, Ozbolat IT, Yu Y.Progress in organ bioprinting for regenerative medicine. Engineering. 2024;42:121–142.
142.
Liu H, Kuang H, Wang Y, Bao L, Cao W, Yu L, Qi M, Wang R, Yang X, Ye Q, et al.MSC-derived exosomes protect auditory hair cells from neomycin-induced damage via autophagy regulation. Biol Res. 2024;57(1):3.
143.
Zhao D, Zhang Y, Wang F, Kaewmanee R, Cui W, Wu T, Du Y.Drug-phospholipid conjugate nano-assembly for drug delivery. Smart Med. 2024;3(4):Article e20240053.
144.
Li T, Cipolla D, Rades T, Boyd BJ.Drug nanocrystallisation within liposomes. J Control Release. 2018;288:96–110.
145.
Zou J, Feng H, Sood R, Kinnunen PKJ, Pyykko I.Biocompatibility of liposome nanocarriers in the rat inner ear after Intratympanic administration. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2017;12(1):372.
146.
An X, Wang R, Chen E, Yang Y, Fan B, Li Y, Han B, Li Q, Liu Z, Han Y, et al.A forskolin-loaded nanodelivery system prevents noise-induced hearing loss. J Control Release. 2022;348:148–157.
147.
Hou S, Yang Y, Zhou S, Kuang X, Yang Y, Gao H, Wang Z, Liu H.Novel SS-31 modified liposomes for improved protective efficacy of minocycline against drug-induced hearing loss. Biomater Sci. 2018;6(6):1627–1635.
148.
Qi J, Fu X, Zhang L, Tan F, Li N, Sun Q, Hu X, He Z, Xia M, Chai R.Current AAV-mediated gene therapy in sensorineural hearing loss. Fundamental Res. 2025;5(1):192–202.
149.
Isgrig K, Cartagena-Rivera AX, Wang HJ, Grati M, Fernandez KA, Friedman TB, Belyantseva IA, Chien W.Combined AAV-mediated gene replacement therapy improves auditory function in a mouse model of human DFNB42 deafness. Mol Ther. 2023;31(9):2783–2795.
150.
Qi J, Zhang L, Tan F, Zhang Y, Zhou Y, Zhang Z, Wang H, Yu C, Jiang L, Liu J, et al.Preclinical efficacy and safety evaluation of AAV-OTOF in DFNB9 mouse model and nonhuman primate. Adv Sci. 2024;11(3):2306201.
151.
Yoshimura H, Shibata SB, Ranum PT, Moteki H, Smith RJH.Targeted allele suppression prevents progressive hearing loss in the mature murine model of human TMC1 deafness. Mol Ther. 2019;27(3):681–690.
152.
Farag VE, Devey EA, Leong KW.The interface of gene editing with regenerative medicine. Engineering. 2025;46:73–100.
153.
Zhu W, Du W, Rameshbabu AP, Armstrong AM, Silver S, Kim Y, Wei W, Shu Y, Liu X, Lewis MA, et al.Targeted genome editing restores auditory function in adult mice with progressive hearing loss caused by a human microRNA mutation. Sci Transl Med. 2024;16(755):eadn0689.
154.
Xue Y, Tao Y, Wang X, Wang X, Shu Y, Liu Y, Kang W, Chen S, Cheng Z, Yan B, et al.RNA base editing therapy cures hearing loss induced by OTOF gene mutation. Mol Ther. 2023;31(12):3520–3530.
155.
Micaletti F, Escoffre J-M, Kerneis S, Bouakaz A, Galvin JJ, Boullaud L, Bakhos D.Microbubble-assisted ultrasound for inner ear drug delivery. Adv Drug Del Rev. 2024;204:Article 115145.
156.
Liu K, Jing B, Kang J, Han L, Chang J.Ultrasound-enabled nanomedicine for tumor theranostics. Engineering. 2025;2025(46):101–129.
157.
Shih C-P, Chen H-C, Chen H-K, Chiang M-C, Sytwu H-K, Lin Y-C, Li S-L, Shih Y-F, Liao A-H, Wang C-H.Ultrasound-aided microbubbles facilitate the delivery of drugs to the inner ear via the round window membrane. J Control Release. 2013;167(2):167–174.
158.
He Y, Chen Z, Liu Q, Li Z, Wen D, Zhang H, Zhang M, Jiang D, Li H, Wen L, et al.Reversible opening of the blood-labyrinth barrier by low-pressure pulsed ultrasound and microbubbles for the treatment of inner ear diseases. J Control Release. 2024;372:318–330.
159.
Liang Z, Yu H, Lai J, Wen L, Chen G.An easy-to-prepare microshotgun for efficient transmembrane delivery by powering nanoparticles. J Control Release. 2020;321:119–131.
160.
Yi X, Guo L, Zeng Q, Huang S, Wen D, Wang C, Kou Y, Zhang M, Li H, Wen L, et al.Magnetic/acoustic dual-controlled microrobot overcoming oto-biological barrier for on-demand multidrug delivery against hearing loss. Small. 2024;20(44):2401369.
161.
Ren H, Huang D, Qiu M, Xue L, Zhu S, Gan J, Chen C, Chen D, Wang J.Microfluidic 3D printing hydrogels based on fish liver decellularized extracellular matrix for liver regeneration. Smart Med. 2024;3(4):e20240056.
162.
Fu F, Liu C, Jiang Z, Zhao Q, Shen A, Wu Y, Gu W.Polymeric silk fibroin hydrogel as a conductive and multifunctional adhesive for durable skin and epidermal electronics. Smart Med. 2024;3(3):Article e20240027.
163.
Yuan Y, Zhang Q, Lin S, Li J.Water: The soul of hydrogels. Prog Mater Sci. 2025;148:Article 101378.
164.
Song T, Zhang H, Liu G, Qiu Y, Wang H.Pancreatic cancer cell line in responsive hydrogel microcapsules for drug evaluation. VIEW. 2024;5(1):20230048.
165.
Guo J, Zhang H, Zhang H, Chen H, Gu Z, Zhang D, Zhao Y.Jellyfish tentacle-inspired hydrogel microfibers implanted with discrete structural color microsphere tactile sensing units. Adv Fiber Mater. 2022;4(5):1209–1218.
166.
Lin X, Zhang H, Zhang H, Zhang Z, Chen G, Zhao Y.Bio-printed hydrogel textiles based on fish skin decellularized extracellular matrix for wound healing. Engineering. 2023;25:120–127.
167.
Wang H, Zhang H, Xie Z, Chen K, Ma M, Huang Y, Li M, Cai Z, Wang P, Shen H.Injectable hydrogels for spinal cord injury repair. Eng Regen. 2022;3(4):407–419.
168.
Su H, Ma Y, Li W, Ren H, Maimaitikelimu X, Lin F, Zhang H, Liu S, Chen Q, Wang H.Hierarchical gelatin-derived hydrogel film with reactive oxygen species scavenging properties for spinal cord injury repair. Chem Eng J. 2025;503:Article 158134.
169.
Tian L, Khan S, Shakeri A, Jackson K, Saif AT, Bayat F, He L, Gu J, Li Y, Didar TF, et al.Virus-assembled biofunctional microarrays with hierarchical 3D nano-reticular network. Adv Funct Mater. 2025;35(14):2414375.
170.
Tian L, He L, Jackson K, Saif A, Khan S, Wan Z, Didar TF, Hosseinidoust Z.Self-assembling nanofibrous bacteriophage microgels as sprayable antimicrobials targeting multidrug-resistant bacteria. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):7158.
171.
Han F, Liu Z, Wei Q, Ding L, Yu L, Wang J, Wang H, Zhang W, Yu Y, Zhao Y, et al.Minimally invasive implantable biomaterials for bone reconstruction. Engineering. 2025;46:23–46.
172.
Xue Y, Zhou J, Lu Y, Zhang H, Chen B, Dong S, Xue Y, Zhan K, Chen C, Sun Y, et al.Advancements in wound management: Microenvironment-sensitive bioactive dressings with on-demand regulations for diabetic wounds. Engineering. 2025;48:234–261.
173.
Tian L, Jackson K, He L, Khan S, Thirugnanasampanthar M, Gomez M, Bayat F, Didar TF, Hosseinidoust Z.High-throughput fabrication of antimicrobial phage microgels and example applications in food decontamination. Nat Protoc. 2024;19(6):1591–1622.
174.
Li W, Chen Q, Ma Y, Su H, Ren H, Wang H.Antibacterial hydrogels for bacteria-infected wound treatment. Biomed Technol. 2025;9:Article 100066.
175.
Le TP, Yu Y, Kwon HC, Shin SA, Park YH, Huh KM.Novel self-degradable prodrug blend thermogel for Intratympanic drug delivery to treat inner ear diseases. Chem Eng J. 2023;476:Article 146726.
176.
Su H, Chen H, Wen B, Lu L, Zhang D, Wang H.Chitosan-based fluorescent inverse opal particles for Cr(VI) sensing. NPJ Clean Water. 2023;6(1):70.
177.
Cai Q, Shi M, Chen J, Kong C, Wang X, Yuan Y, Lu J, Zheng D, Sun Y.A precision therapy paradigm for noise-induced hearing loss: Integrating transcriptome-guided drug repurposing with in situ hydrogel delivery. Biomater Sci. 2026;14(7):1723–1737.
178.
Wang H, Zhang H, Chen Z, Zhao Y, Gu Z, Shang L.Polymer-based responsive structural color materials. Prog Mater Sci. 2023;135:Article 101091.
179.
Wang H, Zhang H, Zhang X, Chen H, Lu L, Chai R.Ionically imprinting-based copper (II) label-free detection for preventing hearing loss. Engineering. 2024;33:276–282.
180.
Liu S, Yu J-M, Gan Y-C, Qiu X-Z, Gao Z-C, Wang H, Chen S-X, Xiong Y, Liu G-H, Lin S-E, et al.Biomimetic natural biomaterials for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: New biosynthesis methods, recent advances, and emerging applications. Mil Med Res. 2023;10(1):16.
181.
Saber A, Strand SP, Ulfendahl M.Use of the biodegradable polymer chitosan as a vehicle for applying drugs to the inner ear. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2010;39(1):110–115.
182.
Yu Y, Kim DH, Suh EY, Jeong S-H, Kwon HC, Le TP, Kim Y, Shin S-A, Park Y-H, Huh KM.Injectable glycol chitosan thermogel formulation for efficient inner ear drug delivery. Carbohydr Polym. 2022;278:Article 118969.
183.
Kong B, Qi C, Wang H, Kong T, Liu Z.Tissue adhesives for wound closure. Smart Med. 2023;2(1):Article e20220033.
184.
Zhang H, Wang K, Xu D, Miao S, Dai Y, Liu P, Wang H.Conductive nerve conduits with orientated topological structures from ice-templating technology. Smart Med. 2025;4(3):Article e70012.
185.
Wu Y, Mao J, Zhou Y, Hong G, Wu H, Hu Z, Huang X, Shi J, Xie Z, Lan Y.Youthful brain-derived extracellular vesicle-loaded GelMA hydrogel promotes scarless wound healing in aged skin by modulating senescence and mitochondrial function. Research. 2025;8:0644.
186.
Chen X, Ren L, Zhang H, Hu Y, Liao M, Shen Y, Wang K, Cai J, Cheng H, Guo J, et al.Basic fibroblast growth factor-loaded methacrylate gelatin hydrogel microspheres for spinal nerve regeneration. Smart Med. 2023;2(2):Article e20220038.
187.
Li W, Su H, Ma Y, Ren H, Feng Z, Wang Y, Qiu Y, Wang H, Wang H, Chen Q, et al.Multicargo-loaded inverse opal gelatin hydrogel microparticles for promoting bacteria-infected wound healing. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;260:Article 129557.
188.
Ma Y, Su H, Li W, Mao S, Feng Z, Qiu Y, Chen K, Chen Q, Wang H, Zhu Z.The hyaluronic acid-gelatin hierarchical hydrogel for osteoporotic bone defect repairment. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;276: 133821.
189.
Qiu L, Kong B, Kong T, Wang H.Recent advances in liver-on-chips: Design, fabrication, and applications. Smart Med. 2023;2(1):Article e20220010.
190.
Wang J, Huang D, Ren H, Zhao Y.Bioinspired spatially ordered multicellular lobules for liver regeneration. Research. 2025;8:0634.
191.
Su H, Chen Y, Xuan Z, Ren H, Lu P, Zhao M, Wang H.Permeable hydrogel encapsulated osteosarcoma-on-a-chip for high-throughput multi-drugs screening. Smart Med. 2025;4(3):Article e70013.
192.
Qiu J, Liang Y, Wang C, Yu Y, Zhang Y, Liu H, Han L.Microfluidic barcode biochips for high-throughput real-time biomolecule and single-cell screening. Engineering. 2025;46:130–146.
193.
Cheng S, Yang L, Dong M, Luo X, Zhang X, Zhai Y, He Y, Wang Y, Peng X, Li X, et al.Metabolism-regulating microspheres: Design principles, therapeutic applications across multisystem diseases, and future perspectives. Research. 2026;9:1106.
194.
Lu M, Luo Z, Chen H, Zhao Y.Hierarchical micro/nano-structured biomaterials for wound healing. Research. 2025;8:0968.
195.
Wang H, Zhao Z, Liu Y, Shao C, Bian F, Zhao Y.Biomimetic enzyme cascade reaction system in microfluidic electrospray microcapsules. Sci Adv. 2018;4(6):Article eaat2816.
196.
Wang H, Zhang H, Kong B, Wang P, Shen H.Artificial cells from microfluidic electrospray for reactive oxygen species scavenging. Mater Des. 2023;234:Article 112355.
197.
Wei X, Bian F, Zhang H, Wang H, Zhu Y.Multiplex assays of bladder cancer protein markers with magnetic structural color hydrogel microcarriers based on microfluidics. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2021;346:Article 130464.
198.
Wang J, Wang C, Wang Q, Zhang Z, Wang H, Wang S, Chi Z, Shang L, Wang W, Shu Y.Microfluidic preparation of gelatin methacryloyl microgels as local drug delivery vehicles for hearing loss therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2022;14(41):46212–46223.
199.
Chen H, Zhang H, Dai Y, Zhu H, Hong G, Zhu C, Qian X, Chai R, Gao X, Zhao Y.Magnetic hydrogel microrobots delivery system for deafness prevention. Adv Funct Mater. 2023;33(35):2303011.
200.
Feng B, Dong T, Song X, Zheng X, Jin C, Cheng Z, Liu Y, Zhang W, Wang X, Tao Y, et al.Personalized porous gelatin methacryloyl sustained-release nicotinamide protects against noise-induced hearing loss. Adv Sci. 2024;11(12):2305682.
201.
Russo E, Villa C.Poloxamer hydrogels for biomedical applications. Pharmaceutics. 2019;11(12):671.
202.
Le TP, Yu Y, Cho IS, Suh EY, Kwon HC, Shin SA, Park YH, Huh KM.Injectable poloxamer hydrogel formulations for intratympanic delivery of dexamethasone. J Korean Med Sci. 2023;38(17):Article e135.
203.
Gausterer JC, Saidov N, Ahmadi N, Zhu C, Wirth M, Reznicek G, Arnoldner C, Gabor F, Honeder C.Intratympanic application of poloxamer 407 hydrogels results in sustained N-acetylcysteine delivery to the inner ear. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2020;150:143–155.
204.
Nguyen TN, Yoo S-Y, Tangchang W, Lee J-Y, Son H-Y, Park J-S.Sustained delivery of triamcinolone acetonide from a thermosensitive microemulsion gel system for the treatment of sensorineural hearing loss. Drug Deliv. 2023;30(1):2242003.
205.
Liao A-H, Shih C-P, Li M-W, Lin Y-C, Chuang H-C, Wang C-H.Development of thermosensitive poloxamer 407-based microbubble gel with ultrasound mediation for inner ear drug delivery. Drug Deliv. 2021;28(1):1256–1271.
206.
Zheng H, Zuo B.Functional silk fibroin hydrogels: Preparation, properties and applications. J Mat Chem B. 2021;9(5):1238–1258.
207.
Zhang H, Wang H, Wen B, Lu L, Zhao Y, Chai R.Ultrasound-responsive composited conductive silk conduits for peripheral nerve regeneration. Small Struct. 2023;4(9):2300045.
208.
Ma Y, Chen Q, Li W, Su H, Li S, Zhu Y, Zhou J, Feng Z, Liu Z, Mao S, et al.Spinal cord conduits for spinal cord injury regeneration. Eng Regen. 2023;4(1):68–80.
209.
Zhang H, Chen H, Lu L, Wang H, Zhao Y, Chai R.Natural multifunctional silk microcarriers for noise-induced hearing loss therapy. Adv Sci. 2024;11(1):2305215.
210.
Li M, Ai M, Yang Y, Yao X, Zhou Z, Wang H, Li C, Xu K.Silk-coated dexamethasone non-spherical microcrystals for local drug delivery to inner ear. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2020;150:Article 105336.
211.
Yu D, Sun C, Zheng Z, Wang X, Chen D, Wu H, Wang X, Shi F.Inner ear delivery of dexamethasone using injectable silk-polyethylene glycol (PEG) hydrogel. Int J Pharm. 2016;503(1):229–237.
212.
Xiong H, Zhang P, Wang D, Zhou Z, Sun J, Diao M.A silk-based hydrogel containing dexamethasone and lipoic acid microcrystals for local delivery to the inner ear. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2024;237:Article 113855.
213.
Kim ES, Gustenhoven E, Mescher MJ, Leary Pararas EE, Smith KA, Spencer AJ, Tandon V, Borenstein JT, Fiering J.A microfluidic reciprocating intracochlear drug delivery system with reservoir and active dose control. Lab Chip. 2014;14(4):710–721.
214.
Tandon V, Kang WS, Robbins TA, Spencer AJ, Kim ES, McKenna MJ, Kujawa SG, Fiering J, Pararas EEL, Mescher MJ, et al.Microfabricated reciprocating micropump for Intracochlear drug delivery with integrated drug/fluid storage and electronically controlled dosing. Lab Chip. 2016;16(5):829–846.
215.
Forouzandeh F, Zhu X, Alfadhel A, Ding B, Walton JP, Cormier D, Frisina RD, Borkholder DA.A nanoliter resolution implantable micropump for murine inner ear drug delivery. J Control Release. 2019;298:27–37.
216.
Taiber S, Cohen R, Yizhar-Barnea O, Sprinzak D, Holt JR, Avraham KB.Neonatal AAV gene therapy rescues hearing in a mouse model of SYNE4 deafness. EMBO Mol Med. 2020;13(2):e13259
217.
Phillips J, Mikulec AA, Robinson JM, Skarinsky D, Anderson JJ.Efficacy of Intratympanic OTO-104 for the treatment of Ménière’s disease: The outcome of three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. Otol Neurotol. 2023;44(6):584–592.
218.
Kil J, Lynch ED, Griffiths S, Lobarinas E, Spankovich C, Antonelli PJ, Prell CL.Efficacy of SPI-1005 for prevention of noise-induced hearing loss: Phase 2 clinical trial results. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;151(S1):P83–P84.
219.
Staecker H, Morelock M, Kramer T, Chrbolka P, Ahn JH, Meyer T.Safety of repeated-dose Intratympanic injections with AM-101 in acute inner ear tinnitus. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;157(3):478–487.
220.
Kitcher SR, Kirkwood NK, Camci ED, Wu P, Gibson RM, Redila VA, Simon JA, Rubel EW, Raible DW, Richardson GP, et al.ORC-13661 protects sensory hair cells from aminoglycoside and cisplatin ototoxicity. JCI Insight. 2019;4(15):Article e126764.
221.
McLean WJ, Hinton AS, Herby JTJ, Salt AN, Hartsock JJ, Wilson S, Lucchino DL, Lenarz T, Warnecke A, Prenzler N, et al.Improved speech intelligibility in subjects with stable sensorineural hearing loss following intratympanic dosing of FX-322 in a phase 1b study. Otol Neurotol. 2021;42(7):e849–e857.
222.
Shi X, Wang Z, Ren W, Chen L, Xu C, Li M, Fan S, Xu Y, Chen M, Zheng F, et al.LDL receptor-related protein 1 (LRP1), a novel target for opening the blood-labyrinth barrier (BLB). Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022;7(1):175.
223.
Salt AN, Turner JG.Drug selection for inner ear therapy. Front Pharmacol. 2024;15:Article 1452927.
224.
Yoon JY, Yang K-J, Park S-N, Kim D-K, Kim J-D.The effect of dexamethasone/cell-penetrating peptide nanoparticles on gene delivery for inner ear therapy. Int J Nanomedicine. 2016;11:6123–6134.
225.
Tarabichi O, Correa T, Kul E, Phillips S, Darkazanly B, Young SM, Hansen MR.Development and evaluation of helper-dependent adenoviral vectors for inner ear gene delivery. Hear Res. 2023;435:Article 108819.
226.
Ishibashi Y, Sung CYW, Grati M, Chien W.Immune responses in the mammalian inner ear and their implications for AAV-mediated inner ear gene therapy. Hear Res. 2023;432:Article 108735.
227.
Daoudi H, Ferrary E, Moula C, Agnely F, Bochot A, Cailleau C, Nguyen Y, Lahlou G, Torres R.Micro-CT analysis of rodent temporal bones: Identifying optimal species for otological research. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2025;10(3):Article e70190.
228.
Ma Z, Huang W, Xu J, Qiu J, Liu Y, Ye M, Fan S.Analysis of deafness susceptibility gene of neonates in northern Guangdong, China. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):362.
229.
Chandrasekhar SS, Tsai Do BS, Schwartz SR, Bontempo LJ, Faucett EA, Finestone SA, Hollingsworth DB, Kelley DM, Kmucha ST, Moonis G, et al.Clinical practice guideline: Sudden hearing loss (update). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;161(1_suppl):S1–S45.
230.
FDA Investigational New Drug (IND) Application. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/types-applications/investigational-new-drug-ind-application
232.
Chen D, Luo Y, Pan J, Chen A, Ma D, Xu M, Tang J, Zhang H.Long-term release of dexamethasone with a Polycaprolactone-coated electrode alleviates fibrosis in Cochlear implantation. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:Article 740576.
233.
Wang Z, Yan Y, Chen W, Tan Z, Yan Q, Chen Q, Ding X, Shen J, Gao M, Yang Y, et al.Preparation and characterization of neural stem cell-loaded conductive hydrogel Cochlear implant electrode coatings. Biomater Adv. 2025;167:Article 214109.
234.
Cochlear implant with combined electrical stimulation and acoustic amplification. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfPCD/classification.cfm?ID=PGQ
235.
FDA Office of Combination Products. https://www.fda.gov/combination-products
236.
Cheng H, Zhang B, Jiang P, Liao M, Gao X, Xu D, Wang Y, Hu Y, Wang H, Liu T, et al.Biomaterial-based drug delivery systems in the treatment of inner ear disorders. J Nanobiotechnol. 2025;23(1):297.
237.
Zhou ZB, Bai X, Zhou ZY, Lin ZY, Liao B, Gong F, Wang MQ, Chen XB, Liu YH, Chen HP, et al.Bioadhesive drug-loaded microparticles prolong drug retention in the middle ear and ameliorate cisplatin-induced hearing loss. J Control Release. 2025;383:Article 113728.
Appendix
Less
Year 2026 volume 9 Issue 8
PDF
96
52
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.34133/research.1396
  • Receive Date：2026-02-10
  • Online Date：2026-10-16
  • Published：2026-08-20
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received：2026-02-10
  • Revised：2026-07-22
  • Accepted：2026-07-24
Affiliations
    1Biological Laboratory of Hetao Cooperation Zone, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518033, China.
    2School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China.
    3Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China.

Corresponding:

* Address correspondence to: (M.L.);
* Address correspondence to: (J.G.);
* Address correspondence to: (H.W.)
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/research/EN/10.34133/research.1396
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family		 属数
Number of
genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)		 属
Genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT
Links
Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read
Collections
Updates
Events
News
Multimedia
About
About Us
Contact
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
100081
010-62662699(Operation and Technical Support)
qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House