In the 21st century, the global population structure is undergoing a profound shift toward aging, accompanied by a sharp increase in the incidence of age-related diseases, posing severe challenges to socioeconomic and healthcare systems [
1]. Organismal aging, as a fundamental biological phenomenon, underlies the development and exacerbation of multiple age-related pathologies, including Alzheimer’s disease, cardiovascular conditions, osteoarthritis (OA), and pulmonary fibrosis [
2]. However, most approved drugs target symptoms or single pathways and fail to directly intervene in senescent cells or reverse/delay the underlying drivers of aging. Cellular senescence, defined as an irreversible halt in cell division, is essential for normal tissue regeneration and cancer prevention [
3]. However, with aging or chronic stress, senescent cells abnormally accumulate in tissues. Characterized by permanent withdrawal from the cell cycle and evasion of programmed cell death, these cells nonetheless maintain robust metabolic function. Their persistent secretion of proinflammatory cytokines, matrix-degrading enzymes, and mitogenic signals constitutes what is known as the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) [
4,
5]. In addition to being governed primarily by the DNA damage response (DDR), the SASP is modulated through an intricate network of signaling cascades encompassing the p53–p21, p16–Rb, nuclear factor κB (NF-κB), mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR), and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) axes [
6]. These pathways collectively induce and modulate the secretory phenotype, making it highly dynamic and variable depending on the type of senescence and the cellular context [
4,
7]. The SASP creates a disruptive microenvironment, triggering chronic low-grade inflammation (inflammaging), impairing neighboring cell function, disrupting tissue homeostasis, and directly promoting the pathological progression of numerous age-associated disorders [
7–
10]. Therefore, targeted elimination of aging cells with high specificity or inhibition of their harmful secretions has become important as a next-generation weapon against biological aging [
11]. First-generation senolytics such as navitoclax and dasatinib combined with quercetin, which clear senescent cells by interfering with their antiapoptotic pathways, have demonstrated preliminary efficacy in both preclinical models and early-phase human studies to improve various aging phenotypes [
12,
13]. However, small-molecule drugs face challenges such as pharmacokinetic limitations (uneven tissue distribution and poor blood–brain barrier penetration), efficacy fluctuations due to intermittent dosing, and potential off-target toxicity [
14]. Senomorphics focus on modulating the SASP while maintaining cellular survival but require long-term administration and fail to eradicate the latent risks posed by senescent cells [
15]. These limitations have spurred the need for more precise, durable, and controllable therapeutic strategies. Concurrently, breakthroughs have been made in adoptive cell immunotherapy [
16]. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-engineered T cell therapy, whereby a patient’s own immune cells are retrofitted with synthetic receptors for precise tumor recognition, has emerged as a transformative modality in the oncological management of hematologic origin [
17–
20]. As “living drugs”, CAR T cells possess unique advantages, including long-term survival, expansion in vivo, and precise targeting of diseased cells [
21–
25]. This success has inspired researchers to explore whether this powerful immunotherapy platform can be repurposed to identify and eliminate another type of “diseased” cell—senescent cells. This review systematically examines the scientific foundation, technological evolution, and application prospects of extending CAR T cell therapy from cancer immunotherapy to senescence therapy [
26]. We first dissect the molecular characteristics of senescent cells and their pathological contributions and then detail how CAR T cell engineering strategies can be adapted to target senescence. Next, we summarize key preclinical evidence of CAR T cell interventions directed at senescent cell populations, particularly their dual “clearance–repair” effects in reversing core pathologies such as fibrosis. We also address critical challenges in clinical translation, including specificity, safety, and manufacturing. Finally, we envision future integration with emerging technologies and the potential of CAR T cells as precision antiaging therapies. All CAR-T-cell-based antiaging research discussed herein remains in the preclinical stage and has not yet received approval from any regulatory authority [
27,
28].