收藏切换
RNA-Targeted Therapeutics for Lipid Metabolic Disorders: From Bench to Bedside
收藏切换
PDF
Iqra Ali1, 2, Juhui Qiu1, Wai San Cheang3, Guixue Wang1, 2, *, Suowen Xu4, 5, *
Research. Vol 9 Article ID 1288
Less
收藏切换
Research. Vol 9 Article ID 1288
• REVIEW ARTICLE •
RNA-Targeted Therapeutics for Lipid Metabolic Disorders: From Bench to Bedside
Full
Iqra Ali1, 2, Juhui Qiu1, Wai San Cheang3, Guixue Wang1, 2, *, Suowen Xu4, 5, *
Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory for Biorheological Science and Technology of Ministry of Education, State and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory for Vascular Implants, College of Bioengineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China.
  • 2Institute of Panvascular Biology, JinFeng Laboratory, Chongqing 401329, China.
  • 3State Key Laboratory of Mechanism and Quality of Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Macau, SAR, China.
  • 4Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230001, China.
  • 5Anhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Metabolic Health and Panvascular Diseases, Hefei 230001, China.
Published: 2026-05-20 doi: 10.34133/research.1288
Outline
收藏切换

Lipid accumulation drives the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, the leading cause of death worldwide. The liver is the primary target for lipid-lowering therapies due to its central role in lipid metabolism. Despite advances in small-molecule drugs, substantial residual cardiovascular risk remains. Recent clinical evidence in 2026 reaffirms the “lower is better” paradigm, showing that achieving very low low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (<55 mg/dl) improves outcomes versus standard goals (<70 mg/dl). RNA-targeted therapeutics, including antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) and small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), offer a transformative approach by durably silencing genetically validated lipid targets. Conjugation to N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) enables hepatocyte-specific delivery. Examples include inclisiran (targeting proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 [PCSK9]) and agents against apolipoprotein C-III (APOC3), lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], and angiopoietin-like protein 3 (ANGPTL3). Beyond protein-coding messenger RNAs (mRNAs), RNA therapeutics can also target noncoding RNAs (microRNAs and long noncoding RNAs) that regulate cholesterol homeostasis. Additionally, mRNA lipid nanoparticle-based in vivo base editing (e.g., VERVE 101/102 targeting PCSK9) has entered clinical trials, offering potential for permanent genetic correction with a single infusion. In the future, RNA-targeted therapeutics may expand beyond hepatic lipid modulation to directly target vascular lipid metabolism and plaque biology. Advances in extrahepatic delivery and rational combination regimens could transform RNA therapy from transient lipid-lowering to long-term, disease-modifying interventions. The recent 2026 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association dyslipidemia guideline emphasizes the clinical importance of targeting PCSK9, APOC3, Lp(a), and ANGPTL3. This review provides a state-of-the-art overview of RNA-targeted therapeutics in hyperlipidemia and discusses future research directions in this emerging field.

Iqra Ali, Juhui Qiu, Wai San Cheang, Guixue Wang, Suowen Xu. RNA-Targeted Therapeutics for Lipid Metabolic Disorders: From Bench to Bedside[J]. Research, 2026 , 9 (5) : 1288 - . DOI: 10.34133/research.1288
Lipid metabolic disorders are major global health challenges and represent the key drivers of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), which continues to be the primary cause of death globally [1,2]. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) were responsible for 437 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) and an expected 19.2 million deaths in 2023, with the clinical manifestations of atherosclerosis constituting the largest share of this burden [3–5]. Critically, approximately 80% of the attributable CVD burden is linked to modifiable risk factors [5]. The principle that “lower is better” for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) has recently been reinforced by a randomized trial showing that achieving LDL-C levels below 55 mg/dl substantially reduces major cardiovascular events compared with the standard target of below 70 mg/dl (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.86; P = 0.002) (NCT04626973) [6]. A focused analysis of the metabolic burden revealed that while high systolic blood pressure remains a major contributor, the increasing impact of metabolic risk, like elevated plasma glucose during fasting and high body mass index (BMI), highlights the need for strategies targeting lipid and metabolic dysregulation (Fig. 1) [7].
ASCVD arises as a downstream consequence of chronic disturbances in lipid metabolism [8,9]. Nowadays, it is increasingly recognized as a lipid-inflammatory disorder, where substantial residual inflammatory risk persists even in optimally lipid-controlled patients, underscoring the need for therapeutic strategies that address both drivers of atherosclerosis [10]. Its lipid-driven inflammatory [11] process is initiated by endothelial dysfunction [12], which allows apolipoprotein B (ApoB)-containing lipoproteins [13], primarily LDL [14,15] and very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) remnants, to infiltrate the arterial intima. Within the subendothelial space, these particles undergo oxidative modification [16], triggering a pathogenic cascade: endothelial cells express adhesion molecules that recruit monocytes, which develop into macrophages and become foam cells by consuming modified lipids, contributing to early lesion formation and eventually to ASCVD [17]. This process escalates as activated immune cells and vascular smooth muscle cells promote and facilitate plaque development [18], which is distinguished by a lipid-rich necrotic core and a fibrous cap [19].
Despite decades of therapeutic advances targeting this pathway, such as the optimum reduction of LDL-C using statins, ezetimibe, bempedoic acid, or proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) monoclonal antibodies, a considerable residual cardiovascular risk remains [20,21]. Genetically determined lipoproteins and regulatory proteins, notably PCSK9, lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], apolipoprotein C-III (ApoC3), and angiopoietin-like protein 3 (ANGPTL3), are now recognized as major, independent causal drivers of ASCVD [22–26]. Lp(a), an LDL-like particle linked to the unique apolipoprotein(a), promotes plaque inflammation [27,28] and calcification [29]. ApoC3 delays the elimination of triglyceride (TG)-rich lipoproteins, resulting in the buildup of atherogenic remains [30–33]. ANGPTL3 regulates lipid metabolism through the inhibition of lipoprotein lipase and endothelial lipase [34,35], and its production is dictated at the transcriptional level in hepatocytes [36]. Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a prevalent inherited lipid condition caused mostly by LDL receptor (LDLR) mutations and, less commonly, by PCSK9 or ApoB variants, and exemplifies the clinical consequences of dysregulated lipoprotein metabolism. Individuals with FH experience lifelong elevations of LDL-C and substantially higher chance of premature ASCVD, highlighting the translational importance of targeting these genetic pathways [37].
The treatment of CVDs, including ASCVD, has shifted toward drugs that target specific pathways, such as receptors and enzymes [38]. We are now entering a new era with novel advanced therapies (NATs), particularly RNA-targeted therapeutics [39], a term we use here to refer specifically to antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) and small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) that achieve gene silencing through sequence-specific binding to target RNA transcripts (including both protein-coding messenger RNAs [mRNAs] and noncoding RNAs [ncRNAs]). These treatments work by silencing the expression of single genes that cause disease, exhibiting a more precise and genetically informed strategy for managing ASCVD. Despite these advances, residual cardiovascular risk persists, motivating developing innovative medicines that directly target the genetic underpinnings of lipid dysregulation. Among the most modern therapies in the cardiovascular area are ASOs and siRNAs [38], which achieve highly specific gene silencing via attaching to and causing the degradation of target mRNAs [40,41]. This approach requires only sequence complementarity, enabling the precise inhibition of previously inaccessible pathogenic transcripts [42]. The clinical viability of this platform has been revolutionized by N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) conjugation, which allows for targeted distribution to hepatocytes, the primary site of synthesis for these atherogenic proteins via the asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGPR) [43,44]. The clinical validation of this paradigm was achieved with inclisiran, a GalNAc-conjugated siRNA targeting PCSK9, demonstrating a consistent LDL-C decrease with 2-year dosage [45].
This review highlights how RNA-targeted therapeutics are transforming the management of lipid-driven diseases and their downstream cardiovascular consequences, including ASCVD, by targeting their genetic causes. We describe key targets, PCSK9, Lp(a), ApoC3, and ANGPTL3, and why RNA platforms are well suited to modulate them. Finally, we summarize the progression from preclinical studies to late-stage trials, illustrating the shift toward gene-level interventions. While previous reviews have provided excellent summaries of RNA-targeted therapies for dyslipidemia, including the foundational work by Tsimikas [46] and the recent comprehensive analysis by Kosmas et al. [47], the present manuscript offers an updated perspective. Unlike these prior reviews, which focused exclusively on protein-coding mRNAs and ASO/siRNA silencing, we expand the scope to include (a) ncRNAs (miRNAs and lncRNAs) as targets of RNA-targeted therapeutics, with detailed preclinical evidence for anti-miR ASOs, and (b) mRNA-LNP-based in vivo base editing (e.g., VERVE-101 and VERVE-102 targeting PCSK9), a rapidly emerging modality that has reached clinical trials. In addition, we incorporate the most recent clinical developments and guidelines (e.g., ORION-16, GATEWAY, the 2026 American College of Cardiology [ACC]/American Heart Association [AHA] guideline, and the 2026 ACC Scientific Statement on Gene Editing Therapy in Cardiovascular Disease) and briefly discuss emerging modalities that extend beyond traditional ASOs and siRNAs, such as CRISPR-mediated genome editing, which is RNA-based but not RNA-targeted (as it targets DNA rather than binding directly to a disease-causing mRNA). Together, these elements provide a timely and distinct contribution to the field.
Statins, which inhibit 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, remain the first-line therapy for lowering LDL-C by 30% to 50% and reducing cardiovascular events across diverse populations [48,49]. Their mechanism of action involves blocking the speed-limiting stage in hepatic cholesterol production, which up-regulates LDLRs and enhances LDL clearance [50]. Despite proven efficacy, statin monotherapy frequently fails to achieve contemporary lipid targets in real-world practice. The European DA VINCI registry reported that while 84% of patients on lipid-lowering therapy received statin monotherapy, only 33% attained the 2019 European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society (ESC/EAS) LDL-C goals [51,52]. The benefits of statins extend across age groups, with a large target trial emulation confirming that initiating statins for primary prevention considerably reduces cardiovascular risk in adults aged 75 to 84 years and even in those aged 85 years and older [53]. Additionally, statin use has been associated with reduced risk of chronic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma, providing another rationale for its use in at-risk populations [54].
Ezetimibe is a second-line pharmacological treatment for patients at risk of ASCVD, either as add-on to statin therapy or as monotherapy (NCT00202878) [55–57]. It lowers cholesterol by inhibiting intestinal and biliary absorption, reducing both LDL-C and non-HDL-C [58]. Oral ezetimibe (10 mg daily) reduces Lp(a) by approximately 7%, though this is of limited clinical relevance [59,60]. The RACING trial demonstrated that combining moderate-intensity rosuvastatin with ezetimibe was noninferior to high-intensity rosuvastatin monotherapy for 3-year cardiovascular outcomes, with superior LDL-C control and better tolerability (NCT03044665) [61]. The Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International trial demonstrated that for patients experiencing acute coronary syndrome, the incorporation of ezetimibe to intense statin therapy resulted in a substantial decrease in major cardiovascular events. This benefit was particularly pronounced in the subgroup of individuals who also had diabetes mellitus [55,62].
Bempedoic acid is a new cholesterol-lowering drug that inhibits ATP-citrate lyase, an enzyme that operates faster in the cholesterol production pathway than HMG-CoA reductase, the target of statins [63]. In the CLEAR Outcomes trial, treatment in statin-intolerant patients resulted in a 21.1% greater LDL-C reduction and a 13% lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) versus placebo, with no excess muscle-related adverse events but higher incidences of gout and cholelithiasis [64]. A prespecified analysis of 4,206 primary prevention patients demonstrated even greater relative risk reduction for the primary cardiovascular endpoint (hazard ratio [HR] 0.70) and significant reductions in cardiovascular and all-cause mortality (NCT02993406) [65]. Furthermore, supported by phase 3 evidence, bempedoic acid is approved for use either alone in statin-intolerant individuals or as supplementary therapy in combination with statins and ezetimibe in patients with elevated risk of FH or ASCVD who have not reached their desired LDL-C targets (NCT05103254) [66].
Evolocumab and alirocumab (PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies) bind circulating PCSK9, preventing it from degrading LDLRs on hepatocytes, thereby increasing LDL-C clearance [67–69]. In the FOURIER trial, evolocumab reduced LDL-C by 59% and decreased MACE in ASCVD patients (HR 0.85) (NCT01764633) [70]. In the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial, alirocumab added to statin therapy reduced LDL-C by 54.7% compared with placebo (from 101.4 to 53.3 mg/dl) and significantly decreased MACE (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.78 to 0.93) (NCT01663402) [71]. Recent meta-analyses confirm that both agents significantly reduce myocardial infarction, stroke, and coronary revascularization, with some outcome-specific differences between the 2 drugs [72,73]. Beyond LDL-C lowering, PCSK9 inhibitors also reduce Lp(a) by 20% to 30%, supporting their use in patients with elevated Lp(a) as reflected in the 2023 ESC guidelines (Class IIa recommendation) [74]. These agents are generally reserved for high-risk patients not achieving LDL-C goals on maximally tolerated statin and ezetimibe therapy, or those with statin intolerance [75]. More recently, tafolecimab has been approved in China as a third PCSK9 monoclonal antibody, demonstrating robust LDL-C reductions of over 60% in clinical trials [76]. Furthermore, the oral small-molecule PCSK9 inhibitor enlicitide decanoate was evaluated in the phase 3 CORALreef Lipids trial (NCT05952856). In 2,909 patients with or at risk for ASCVD, enlicitide 20 mg daily reduced LDL-C by 57.1% at 24 weeks compared with placebo (P < 0.001), with significant improvements in non-HDL-C, ApoB, and Lp(a) and a favorable safety profile [77].
Fibrate primarily modulates the lipid profile by decreasing TGs and increasing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [78]. Observational data have suggested a potential cardiovascular benefit of fibrates in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), with a nested case–control study reporting an association between fibrate use, particularly pemafibrate, and a lower risk of MACE [79]. A prespecified subgroup analysis of the ACCORD-LIPID trial indicated that fenofibrate improved cardiovascular outcomes, specifically in individuals with atherogenic dyslipidemia, as characterized by high TGs (≥204 mg/dl) and low HDL-C (<34 mg/dl). This benefit was not observed in the broader group of type 2 diabetes patients treated with simvastatin (NCT00000620) [80]. The PROMINENT outcomes trial demonstrated that although pemafibrate improved atherogenic lipid parameters, it did not translate into a reduction in CVDs for high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes and mixed dyslipidemia (NCT03071692) [81].
Icosapent ethyl (IPE), a highly purified ethyl ester of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), was first investigated for its efficacy and safety in clinical trials, such as the MARINE (NCT01047683) [82] and ANCHOR studies (NCT01047501) [83]. IPE (4 g/day) significantly reduced MACE by 25% in the REDUCE-IT trial, with consistent benefit even in patients with baseline LDL-C <55 mg/dl. Cardiovascular death was reduced by 20%, though therapy was associated with increased atrial fibrillation risk [84,85]. However, the use of mineral oil as the placebo comparator has generated discussion regarding potential effects on lipid and inflammatory biomarkers in the control group [86]. Despite this debate, IPE has been incorporated into contemporary lipid management strategies such as AHA and ACC guidance generally recommends it as Class IIb [87], while lipid-focused societies such as the National Lipid Association (NLA) makes a Class I recommendation for use of IPE (4 g/d) for selected high-risk populations [88]. However, its moderate absolute benefit, requirement for high daily dosing, and atrial fibrillation risk highlight limitations of small-molecule approaches.
While the small-molecule drugs discussed above are effective at lowering lipids and mitigating cardiovascular risk, they have inherent limitations that necessitate the development of novel therapies, such as NATs. Drugs such as statins, ezetimibe, and bempedoic acid have a brief duration of action and must be taken every day. While consistent use is essential for reducing LDL cholesterol effectively, real-world adherence to statin therapy is frequently poor, and the duration of treatment decreases [63,89]. Nucleic acid-based therapies may provide greater therapeutic alternatives that try to fix the genetic problem at its root by changing and correcting the disease-causing gene [90]. However, this novel modality is not without its own set of challenges. The widespread adoption of NATs will depend on overcoming substantial hurdles, including high manufacturing costs that may limit patient access (with some genetic therapies exceeding $4 million per patient) [91], lingering questions regarding long-term safety that require ongoing investigation [92], and the risks of immunogenicity and off-target effects that have caused clinical trial failures [93]. Furthermore, real-world implementation demands new healthcare infrastructure, coordination across specialties, and navigation of insurance coverage barriers [94,95]. These pharmacological and practical considerations underscore that NATs are poised to complement, rather than entirely replace, small-molecule therapies.
In addition to targeting protein-coding mRNAs, ASO and siRNA platforms can be directed against ncRNAs, including microRNAs (miRNAs) and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs). This remains an RNA-targeted strategy, as the therapeutic agent binds directly to the ncRNA transcript. Although most of these approaches are still in preclinical or early clinical stages, they represent important future directions for RNA-targeted therapeutics in dyslipidemia and atherosclerosis.
ncRNAs, including miRNAs and lncRNAs, regulate gene expression without encoding proteins and have been implicated in the pathogenesis of dyslipidemia and atherosclerosis [96–98]. Among the most studied miRNAs are miR-33a/b, which are intronic miRNAs embedded within the sterol regulatory element-binding protein genes SREBF2 and SREBF1. These miRNAs act as key posttranscriptional repressors of the cholesterol transporter ABCA1, thereby limiting HDL biogenesis and reverse cholesterol transport [99,100]. Antisense inhibition of miR-33a/b in nonhuman primates increases hepatic ABCA1 expression, raises plasma HDL cholesterol, and lowers VLDL-associated TGs [101], while genetic deletion of miR-33 in mice elevates HDL levels [100]. Beyond lipid metabolism, miR-33a/b also regulates fatty acid oxidation and insulin signaling [102,103]. Despite the therapeutic promise of miR-33 antagonism for dyslipidemia and atherosclerosis, systemic inhibition requires caution due to potential effects on hunger signaling and obesity [103].
miR-122 is a liver-specific miRNA that critically regulates cholesterol and lipid homeostasis. Inhibition of miR-122 reduces plasma cholesterol and hepatic cholesterol synthesis rates [104], whereas genetic deletion leads to hepatosteatosis and dyslipidemia [105]. miR-122 also regulates cholesterol catabolism by suppressing Cyp7a1 [106] and modulates hepatic lipid metabolism through pathways involving fatty acid synthesis and peroxidation [107]. miR-148a is a key posttranscriptional regulator of LDLR expression, directly targeting the LDLR 3′UTR to reduce hepatic LDL-C clearance [108]. It also indirectly suppresses LDLR by repressing the (pro)renin receptor [(P)RR], which stabilizes LDLR protein [109]. Beyond LDL metabolism, miR-148a inhibits ABCA1, thereby limiting HDL biogenesis and reverse cholesterol transport. Therapeutic silencing of miR-148a in mice increases hepatic LDLR and ABCA1 expression, lowering LDL-C while raising HDL-C [108,110], and reduces atherosclerotic plaque burden and promotes plaque stability [111]. Recent nanoparticle-based strategies have been developed to deliver miR-148a inhibitors for hyperlipidemia therapy [112]. Thus, miR-33a/b, miR-122, and miR-148a each play distinct but complementary roles in controlling cholesterol homeostasis, highlighting the therapeutic potential of targeting these miRNAs for the management of dyslipidemia and atherosclerosis.
The therapeutic targeting of miRNAs is achieved using anti-miRNA oligonucleotides (anti-miRs or antagomirs), which are chemically modified ASOs that bind directly to the mature miRNA and block its function [113]. Preclinical “bench: evidence for this approach is robust. Anti-miR-33 treatment in Ldlr−/− mice with established atherosclerotic plaques increased HDL-C, enhanced reverse cholesterol transport, reduced plaque size and lipid content, and increased markers of plaque stability [114]. Anti-miR-122 silencing in mice lowered plasma cholesterol levels and improved hepatic steatosis [104], and the landmark antagomir study demonstrated that miR-122 inhibition reduces cholesterol biosynthesis gene expression and plasma cholesterol [113]. Furthermore, GalNAc-conjugated anti-miR-122 (tiny locked nucleic acid) achieved ~300- to 500-fold greater potency than unconjugated counterparts, illustrating the translational potential of liver-targeted anti-miR delivery [115]. For miR-148a, anti-miR-148a silencing in mice increases hepatic LDLR and ABCA1 expression, lowers LDL-C while raising HDL-C, and reduces atherosclerotic plaque burden [108,111]. Collectively, these studies establish anti-miR therapeutics as a major RNA-targeted strategy for lipid disorders, with strong preclinical evidence supporting their continued development.
In addition to miRNAs, lncRNAs have emerged as important regulators of lipid metabolism and cholesterol homeostasis. LncRNA LeXis is induced by liver X receptor (LXR) activation or a Western diet and mediates the inhibition of cholesterol biosynthesis by interacting with the RNA-binding protein RALY (heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein) [116]. Its human orthologue (TCONS_00016452) has been proposed as a noninvasive diagnostic biomarker for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis [117], and LeXis also contributes to cholesterol efflux by modulating ABCA1 expression [118,119]. Although research is still evolving, LeXis represents a promising lncRNA target for future RNA-targeted therapies against dyslipidemia and atherosclerosis [120,121].
MeXis is an lncRNA that amplifies LXR-dependent transcription of the cholesterol efflux transporter Abca1 by interacting with the transcriptional coactivator DDX17. Loss of MeXis alters chromatin architecture at the Abca1 locus, impairs cholesterol handling, and accelerates atherosclerosis in mice [122]. Accordingly, MeXis is recognized as one of several lncRNAs that regulate ABCA1-mediated cholesterol efflux and atherosclerosis development [118]. CHROME is a primate-specific lncRNA whose expression is induced by dietary cholesterol via LXR activation and is elevated in the plasma and atherosclerotic plaques of patients with coronary artery disease. It promotes cholesterol efflux and HDL biogenesis by sponging miR-27b, miR-33a/b, and miR-128, thereby derepressing their target gene ABCA1 [123]. Consistent with a role in lipid regulation, CHROME expression is up-regulated by atorvastatin treatment in hypercholesterolemic patients, suggesting its involvement in the response to statin therapy [124]. Together, these findings position CHROME as a key regulator of cholesterol homeostasis and a potential therapeutic target for dyslipidemia and atherosclerosis [119]. Collectively, these miRNAs and lncRNAs constitute a complex regulatory network that controls cholesterol homeostasis, and their therapeutic modulation holds promise for the management of dyslipidemia and atherosclerosis.
Beyond RNA-targeted gene silencing, the therapeutic landscape has expanded to include mRNA-based in vivo base editing, which represents a paradigm shift from transient protein modulation to permanent genetic correction [125]. This approach uses lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) to deliver 2 RNA components: an mRNA encoding an adenine base editor and a guide RNA (gRNA) targeting a specific genomic locus. Upon hepatocyte uptake, the base editor introduces a precise single-base change in the DNA, permanently inactivating the target gene without double-strand breaks [125,126].
This strategy has been most clinically advanced for PCSK9 inactivation. VERVE-101, the first in vivo base editing therapy to enter clinical trials (NCT05398029), consists of an adenine base editor mRNA and an optimized gRNA targeting PCSK9, packaged in an LNP. In a nonhuman primate study, a single intravenous infusion of VERVE-101 (1.5 mg/kg) achieved 70% PCSK9 editing in the liver, resulting in 83% reduction in circulating PCSK9 protein and 69% reduction in LDL-C, with durable effects lasting up to 476 d. Transient liver enzyme elevations resolved without sequelae, and no germline editing was detected [127]. Based on these data, VERVE-101 advanced to the phase 1b Heart-1 trial in patients with heterozygous FH and established ASCVD [128].
VERVE-102 (NCT06164730) is a next-generation base editing therapy that uses a GalNAc-conjugated LNP (GalNAc-LNP) to achieve more hepatocyte-specific delivery. This design enables hepatocyte uptake via either the LDLR or the ASGPR, potentially overcoming reduced LDLR function in FH [129]. In nonhuman primates, a single infusion of VERVE-102 (3 mg/kg) led to durable mean reductions of 80% in blood PCSK9 and 62% in LDL-C. Off-target editing was not detected across a panel of ~6,000 candidate sites, and no germline transmission was observed [130]. The ongoing phase 1b Heart-2 trial is evaluating safety, tolerability, and pharmacodynamics in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia or premature coronary artery disease [129,130]. These clinical milestones demonstrate that mRNA-LNP delivery for in vivo base editing has moved from bench to bedside for lipid disorders, complementing RNA-targeted silencing approaches. However, long-term safety, off-target editing risks, and durability beyond the lifespan of edited hepatocytes remain important considerations [125,126,128]. The 2026 ACC Scientific Statement on Gene Editing Therapy in Cardiovascular Disease highlights VERVE-102 as a leading example of in vivo base editing for lipid disorders, noting interim LDL-C reductions of 53% to 69% and emphasizing the potential for durable, single-infusion treatment [131].
Managing cholesterol to prevent ASCVD is a long-term commitment, so any successful treatment must be both safe and easy to tolerate over many years. While standard daily medications such as statins are effective in principle, they depend on consistent daily use to maintain their benefit. In practice, many patients find it hard to adhere to a daily routine, and adherence often decreases over time, undercutting the treatment’s real-world impact. This reliance on perfect adherence further underscores the importance of safety and tolerability [63,89]. For these reasons, research is now shifting toward innovative treatments such as RNA-targeted therapeutics (siRNA and ASO therapies). This strategy marks a breakthrough advance in medicine, enabling the precise targeting of molecules and pathways that traditional drugs and antibody treatments could not previously address. In their development and study, computational methods, especially molecular docking [132] and molecular dynamics simulations [133], are essential tools.
The 2 primary categories of these RNA-targeting drugs are ASOs and siRNAs. Clinically, the key distinction lies in durability: siRNAs achieve prolonged effects through catalytic recycling within RNA-induced silencing complex, whereas ASOs are not recycled and typically require more frequent administration [134–136]. This difference in pharmacological durability was illustrated in the race to develop PCSK9-targeting RNA therapies. The GalNAc-conjugated ASO AZD8233, while effective, required monthly dosing to maintain LDL-C reduction. Its development was discontinued in 2022 [137], whereas the siRNA (inclisiran) achieved approval with a 2-year regimen, underscoring how dosing convenience and sustained efficacy have become decisive factors for chronic ASCVD management. siRNAs can be created artificially and treated, or they can form naturally inside cells from larger RNA molecules, such as those produced during a viral infection [138].
RNA-targeted approaches are inherently modular [139,140]. The therapeutic potential of siRNA-targeted therapeutics has been established across a wide range of disorders, with numerous siRNA-based pharmaceuticals already available on the market, such as inclisiran to reduce LDL-C levels in patients with ASCVD [141], and patisiran to treat hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis [142]. The development of GalNAc-siRNA technology is pivotal for RNA interference (RNAi) treatment [143]. GalNAc ligands bind exceptionally high affinity to the ASGPR, a cell-surface receptor expressed almost exclusively on hepatocytes. This selective interaction facilitates efficient, receptor-mediated endocytosis of GalNAc-conjugated RNA molecules following simple subcutaneous injection (Fig. 2) [144–148]. The liver is the central organ for the synthesis of ApoB-containing lipoproteins and Lp(a), as well as hepatocyte-derived regulators such as ApoC3, ANGPTL3, and PCSK9; therefore, hepatocyte-specific delivery aligns perfectly with the molecular origins of atherosclerotic risk [33,149–153].
FDA-approved RNA-targeted therapies span a variety of indications (Fig. 3), demonstrating the versatility and clinical maturity of this platform. The first approved RNA drug, fomivirsen (ASO, 1998), targeted cytomegalovirus retinitis, establishing early proof of concept for oligonucleotide therapeutics [154]. Since then, RNA-based drugs have been approved for diverse conditions including macular degeneration (pegaptanib and aptamer, 2004) [155]. Eteplirsen (ASO), which was also approved in 2016, is used for Duchenne muscular dystrophy [156]. Givosiran (2019) was indicated for acute hepatic porphyria [157]. Lumasiran (2020) is FDA approved for primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1) [158]. Nedosiran (2023) is an FDA-approved method for lowering urinary oxalate levels in specific patients with PH1, a rare genetic disorder [159]. Donidalorsen (2025) is FDA-approved for the prevention of hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks [160].
For lipid disorders specifically, several RNA-targeted therapies have now been approved. Mipomersen (ASO), approved in 2013, targets FH [161], whereas defibrotide (a complex mixture of oligonucleotides, 2016) is indicated for hepatic veno-occlusive disease [162]. Inclisiran (2021) became the first small-interfering RNA therapy for heterozygous FH or clinical ASCVD [163]. More recently, plozasiran (2025) received FDA approval for treating familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) [164]. The successful development of these lipid-targeting RNA therapies has paved the way for investigational candidates such as pelacarsen (ASO) and olpasiran (siRNA), which are currently in clinical trials for lowering Lp(a) and addressing residual cardiovascular risk. The potential impact of these therapies extends beyond lowering lipid levels [165]. RNA platforms offer the ability to modulate inflammatory mediators [166,167], vascular remodeling pathways, and perhaps plaque instability itself [168]. RNA-targeted therapeutics not only represent incremental additions to existing therapies but also constitute a new class of gene-directed medicines capable of addressing the root causes of atherosclerosis. By expanding the range of druggable targets and providing durable, hepatocyte-specific modulation of pathogenic pathways, RNA-targeted therapeutics hold the potential to redefine lipid-driven ASCVD management.
The development of RNA-targeted therapeutics is built on strong preclinical evidence of their unique mechanism. By silencing genes before protein translation, ASOs and siRNAs overcome the transient nature and protein-targeting limitations of small molecules. This is exemplified by the targeting of key hepatic genes [PCSK9, APOC3, Lp(a), and ANGPTL3], whose loss of function in models confers substantial atheroprotection without harming cells, confirming their suitability for RNA-targeted therapy. This therapeutic promise was realized through parallel breakthroughs in delivery technology.
Advances in the design and delivery, most notably GalNAc conjugation for hepatocyte targeting and the development of LNPs, have enabled the efficient hepatic delivery of these therapeutics, leading to the rapid development of NATs [38,169]. Critical to this progress has been the ongoing optimization of the GalNAc platform itself. Compared with the traditional triantennary structure, a novel serial monovalent GalNAc conjugate design featuring strategically spaced units provided superior in vivo potency and a longer duration of action in mice. This optimization, which is linked to improved intracellular stability, highlights the active engineering of the platform itself to enhance pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy [170]. The success of this liver-targeted paradigm, pioneered in cardiovascular disease by the GalNAc-conjugated siRNA inclisiran, has established it as the foundational and most clinically advanced strategy, even as efforts continue to achieve efficient delivery to other cardiovascular tissues [171,172].
The translational potential of RNAi for cholesterol management was decisively demonstrated by seminal preclinical research. A cross-species, LNP-formulated siRNA targeting PCSK9 induced potent (50% to 70%) and durable silencing of hepatic mRNA in rodents and nonhuman primates. This resulted in a sustained reduction in plasma PCSK9 protein and a corresponding >60% decrease in LDL cholesterol that lasted several weeks after a single dosage, without affecting HDL-C or TGs. Furthermore, preclinical models have demonstrated that PCSK9 silencing concurrently reduces inflammatory pathways, including the down-regulation of key hepatic proinflammatory signaling cascades such as Toll-like receptors, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and phosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase B (PI3K/Akt), thereby attenuating downstream nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) and activator protein 1 (AP-1) activation, alongside other pathways such as the cyclic GMP-AMP synthase/stimulator of interferon genes pathway, highlighting broader pleiotropic benefits beyond lipid lowering [173,174]. Collectively, these findings establish the critical proof of concept that RNAi could achieve specific, long-lasting LDL-C lowering, thereby validating the use of PCSK9 as a target and directly enabling the development of clinical RNAi therapeutics [175].
Targeting APOC3 is a paradigm of genetics-driven drug discovery, as human loss-of-function variants are linked to decrease TGs and lower cardiovascular risk [176–178]. Preclinical studies in transgenic mouse models expressing human APOC3 demonstrated that both ASOs and GalNAc-conjugated siRNAs efficiently knocked down hepatic APOC3, leading to a more effective reduction in plasma APOC3 [179]. Subsequent research focused on optimizing the siRNA chemical scaffold to increase durability and tolerability. A systematic structure–activity relationship study identified a novel, long-acting APOC3 siRNA with minimal chemical modifications. This optimized candidate demonstrated long duration of action and an excellent safety profile across species, with comparative analysis suggesting the potential for less frequent dosing than earlier clinical-stage candidates [180]. The translational importance of this target has been further demonstrated in a novel mouse model of combined hyperlipidemia, where therapeutic lipid lowering successfully reduced atherosclerotic plaque burden, providing a robust system for evaluating future APOC3-targeting therapies [181]. Finally, quantitative systems pharmacology modeling of a GalNAc-conjugated APOC3 siRNA has elucidated the key in vivo delivery processes responsible for its sustained pharmacodynamics, successfully enabling PK/PD translation from animals to humans [182].
Increased Lp(a) is a genetically determined risk factor previously inaccessible to pharmacotherapy. A preclinical proof of concept was established with olpasiran, a GalNAc-conjugated siRNA. In transgenic mice and cynomolgus monkeys, a single dosage produced a dose-responsive decrease in plasma Lp(a), achieving a >80% decrease that was sustained for 5 to 8 weeks, demonstrating the potent and durable silencing achievable through this modality [183,184]. This RNAi approach has been further validated with the GalNAc-conjugated siRNA SLN360. In primary hepatocytes, SLN360 potently and selectively silences LPA mRNA. In cynomolgus monkeys, a single subcutaneous dose produced a dose-dependent, persistent drop in serum Lp(a) of up to 95%, with effects lasting ≥9 weeks. The study established a minimally effective dose (0.3 mg/kg), highlighting the potent and durable pharmacology achievable with this platform [185]. Further optimization of the siRNA platform has yielded candidates with extended durability. The siRNA RN026 demonstrated profound and sustained Lp(a) lowering in preclinical models. In transgenic mice expressing human LPA, a single dose lowered the serum Apo(a) concentration by 98% for more than 6 weeks. In nonhuman primates, a single 2-mg/kg dose achieved a 99% peak reduction in Lp(a), with a 95% reduction maintained at 99 d postdose. RNA sequencing analysis indicated minimal off-target risk, and the candidate was well tolerated in toxicology studies. The preclinical profile suggests the potential for annual dosing intervals in humans, representing a substantial advance in the therapeutic targeting of Lp(a) [186].
In addition to targeting individual lipoproteins, RNAi also enables the silencing of integrative regulators of lipid metabolism. Mechanistic studies in genetic and RNAi-mediated mouse models have demonstrated that ANGPTL3 silencing reduces LDL-C not only by inhibiting lipoprotein lipase but also by a distinct dual mechanism: reducing the hepatic secretion of ApoB-containing lipoproteins and increasing their clearance via the LDLR pathway [187]. This provides a strong scientific basis for its ability to lower multiple atherogenic lipids. Therapeutically, this rationale has been validated with potent RNAi candidates. The GalNAc-conjugated siRNA ANGsiR10 demonstrated remarkable efficacy in dyslipidemic animal models. In transgenic mice with hypertriglyceridemia, a single dose reduced plasma TG by 96%. In a rhesus monkey model of spontaneous dyslipidemia, a single dose achieved a 68% reduction in TGs, with the lipid-lowering effect persisting for up to 15 weeks. Treatment also substantially reduced non-HDL cholesterol levels [188]. Together, this body of work provides definitive evidence that sustained ANGPTL3 silencing with an RNA-targeted therapeutic can achieve profound and durable correction of atherogenic dyslipidemia through multiple mechanisms [187,188].
Targeting hepatic cholesterol synthesis: ACLY siRNA, the RNAi platform is also being leveraged to target fundamental intracellular metabolic enzymes, expanding its reach beyond secreted regulators. A prime example is ATP-citrate lyase (ACLY), a key enzyme upstream of HMG-CoA reductase in the cholesterol biosynthesis pathway. The clinical validation of ACLY as a target was established by the small-molecule inhibitor bempedoic acid [189,190]. Translating this pharmacology into the RNAi domain, a GalNAc-conjugated siRNA targeting hepatic ACLY, aclysiran, has demonstrated compelling preclinical proof of concept. In a murine model of atherosclerosis, monthly administration of aclysiran achieved potent and sustained (~1 month) knockdown of hepatic ACLY, leading to substantial reductions in plasma LDL-C and TGs and attenuation of atherosclerotic plaque burden comparable to that of daily oral bempedoic acid. Importantly, aclysiran operates independently of the ACSVL1 activation required by the small-molecule prodrug, potentially offering a more consistent therapeutic response and bypassing mechanisms associated with muscle toxicity. This approach mechanistically recapitulates the benefits of pharmacological ACLY inhibition but confers an extended dosing interval intrinsic to the siRNA platform [191].
By enabling durable silencing of a critical intracellular enzyme, aclysiran exemplifies the expansion of RNA-targeted therapeutics into direct modulation of cytoplasmic metabolic pathways, offering a novel, long-acting strategy to suppress de novo cholesterol synthesis for patients with statin intolerance or residual cardiovascular risk. Collectively, these preclinical proofs of concept across multiple targets validate the RNAi platform, and their future translational progress will be accelerated by employing advanced experimental models such as vessels-on-a-chip, tissue-engineered vessels, and models of vulnerable plaques that better recapitulate human atherosclerotic pathophysiology [192].
The strong mechanistic and translational foundation established by preclinical studies has enabled rapid clinical advancements in RNA-targeted therapeutics for lipid-driven atherosclerosis (Fig. 4). By targeting genetically validated drivers of dyslipidemia, these agents have demonstrated profound, durable lipid lowering with infrequent dosing schedules, addressing major limitations of conventional therapies.
The successful development of PCSK9 inhibitors, from seminal genetic discoveries to large cardiovascular outcomes trials, has established this class as a potent LDL-C-lowering strategy with an excellent safety profile, paving the way for RNA-targeted approaches such as inclisiran. The evolution of PCSK9-targeted therapies now includes RNA interference, oral inhibitors, and gene therapy as emerging modalities [193]. Inclisiran (Leqvio) is an FDA-approved siRNA therapy for ASCVD and heterozygous FH [194]. It works by silencing PCSK9, an enzyme that breaks down LDLRs, thereby lowering LDL cholesterol [195]. Phase 1 trials revealed a 40% to 50% decrease in LDL-C, which was confirmed in the larger ORION-1 phase 2 study (NCT02597127). In that trial, 2 300-mg subcutaneous doses given 90 d apart produced the best results, with 48% of patients achieving very low LDL-C levels by day 180 [196]. These findings informed phase 3 trials (ORION-10 [NCT03399370] and ORION-11 [NCT03400800]) in cardiovascular patients, including those with high LDL-C despite maximum statin therapy, where LDL-C was reduced by approximately 50% through day 510 [141]. The subsequent VICTORION-2P cardiovascular outcomes trial (NCT05030428) in patients with established ASCVD is ongoing and expected to determine its impact on MACE [197].
The efficacy and safety of inclisiran have now been extended to pediatric populations. In the phase 3 ORION-16 trial involving adolescents with heterozygous FH, inclisiran 300 mg administered subcutaneously on days 1, 90, and 270 reduced LDL cholesterol by 28.5% compared with placebo at day 330, with sustained effects over 2 years and no treatment-related serious adverse events (NCT04652726) [198]. This efficacy is supported by real-world evidence. A meta-analysis of real-world studies demonstrated an average LDL-C reduction of 42.8%, with greater reductions observed when inclisiran was combined with statin therapy (45.7%) than when it was used as monotherapy [199]. Other siRNA therapies in development include ARO-APOC3, which targets APOC3 to lower TGs and has received FDA fast-track status for severe hypertriglyceridemia and related conditions. Similarly, ARO-ANG3, which is now in phase 2 trials, silences ANGPTL3 to treat mixed dyslipidemia [200]. Additional candidates, such as SLN360 (phase 2) and olpasiran (phase 1), are being studied to reduce Lp(a) [201]. Thus, RNA interference has matured from genetic insight into a robust therapeutic platform, exemplified by the approved siRNA inclisiran for lowering LDL-C, with a promising pipeline extending its durable silencing strategy to other key lipid regulators, such as APOC3, ANGPTL3, and Lp(a), to address the multifaceted nature of residual CVD risk.
ApoC3 is a genetically validated, high-value target for reducing residual cardiovascular risk [32]. ApoC3 operates through a parallel pathway to ANGPTL3 and inhibits lipoprotein lipase, impairing the removal of TG-rich lipoproteins (chylomicrons, VLDL, and remnants). This is confirmed by human genetics, where loss-of-function mutations lead to low TG levels and reduced cardiovascular risk [202]. Volanesorsen, an ASO that targets ApoC3, was approved by the FDA in 2019 [203] and markedly reduced plasma TGs and VLDL in individuals with severe hypertriglyceridemia (NCT02300233) and FCS (NCT02211209) [204,205]. However, its clinical use has been restricted by adverse effects, including thrombocytopenia, prompting the development of next-generation agents [203,204]. Olezarsen, a next-generation, GalNAc-conjugated ASO whose promising pharmacology was established in a phase 1/2a trial (NCT02900027), which reported reductions of up to 92% in APOC3 and 77% in TGs [206], was FDA approved in December 2024 for adults with FCS [207]. It inhibits hepatic ApoC3, enhancing TG clearance. The inhibition of hepatic ApoC3 synthesis enhances TG clearance. In the phase 3 BALANCE trial, olezarsen reduced TG levels by approximately 60% in patients with FCS and markedly lowered the incidence of acute pancreatitis events (NCT04568434) [208].
In addition to ASO development, siRNA approaches targeting APOC3 have also demonstrated substantial promise. Plozasiran (ARO-APOC3), a hepatocyte-targeted GalNAc-conjugated siRNA, substantially reduced TG levels in a 48-week phase 2b trial of individuals with mixed hyperlipidemia. At week 24, plozasiran achieved dose-dependent reductions in fasting TGs of 50% to 62% with quarterly dosing and 44% with half-yearly dosing compared with placebo. This trial confirmed that durable APOC3 silencing via RNAi is a potent therapeutic strategy with flexible dosing intervals (NCT04998201) [209]. The efficacy of this siRNA strategy in a more severe population was demonstrated in the SHASTA-2 trial (NCT04720534) in individuals with severe hypertriglyceridemia (TGs 500 to 4,000 mg/dl). Here, plozasiran induced potent, dose-dependent reductions in APOC3 (up to −77%) and TGs (up to −57% placebo-adjusted) at 24 weeks, with 91% of treated individuals achieving TG levels below the 500-mg/dl acute pancreatitis risk threshold. Notably, while marked increases in LDL-C were observed at the highest dose, this increase was accompanied by no change in ApoB and substantial reductions in atherogenic non-HDL-C and remnant cholesterol, suggesting a shift toward larger, more cholesterol-enriched LDL particles. The safety profile was favorable across all doses (NCT04720534) [210]. On the basis of this evidence, the FDA approved plozasiran (Redemplo) on 2025 November 18, for adults with FCS to reduce very high TGs, marking the first siRNA treatment approved for this disorder on the basis of considerable decrease in TGs and pancreatitis risk demonstrated in the phase 3 PALISADE trial (NCT05089084) [211]. A recent meta-analysis of 8 randomized controlled trials confirmed that APOC3-targeted siRNA therapies substantially reduce TGs by 52%, with a concomitant increase in HDL-C of 40.9%, supporting their efficacy in managing hypertriglyceridemia [212].
Collectively, the dual approvals of olezarsen and plozasiran demonstrate the successful translation of human genetics into 2 distinct, long-acting RNA-targeted therapeutic platforms, offering powerful new options for normalizing TGs, mitigating pancreatitis risk, and reducing residual cardiovascular risk.
Lp(a) is a genetically determined and largely statin-resistant risk factor for ASCVD [213–215], making it an ideal candidate for RNA-targeted intervention. Existing lipid-lowering therapies, including PCSK9 inhibitors, provide only modest Lp(a) reduction, falling short of the substantial lowering required for meaningful risk mitigation. Reflecting the growing recognition of Lp(a) as a critical cardiovascular risk factor, the 2026 ACC/AHA Multisociety Guideline on the Management of Dyslipidemia now recommends universal Lp(a) testing at least once in all adults (class 1 recommendation). Levels ≥125 nmol/l (≥50 mg/dl) are associated with a 1.4-fold increased ASCVD risk, while levels ≥250 nmol/l confer a >2-fold increased risk [216], underscoring the urgent need for effective Lp(a)-lowering therapies. This unmet need has accelerated the development of RNA-targeted agents. Pelacarsen, a GalNAc-conjugated ASO made to inhibit hepatic Apo(a) synthesis, demonstrated the feasibility of this approach. In a phase 2b study, pelacarsen achieved robust Lp(a) reductions of ≥80%, with a favorable safety profile, and it is currently being evaluated for cardiovascular outcomes in the phase 3 Lp(a) HORIZON trial (NCT04023552). By providing critical proof of concept, pelacarsen has validated Lp(a) as a druggable target and paved the way for next-generation therapies [217,218]. Consistent with this, subsequent trial data reported even greater dose-dependent reductions of up to 97% [219].
While pelacarsen was validated as the target, the subsequent focus shifted to the siRNA platform, which enables even more profound and durable Lp(a) suppression through the catalytic RNA interference mechanism. Olpasiran, a GalNAc-conjugated siRNA, demonstrated transformative Lp(a)-lowering effects in the phase 2 OCEAN(a)-DOSE trial, with doses ≥75 mg every 12 weeks reducing Lp(a) by >95% (NCT04270760) [220]. In addition to this quantitative reduction, olpasiran also potently reduced the number of oxidized phospholipids on apolipoprotein B (OxPL-ApoB) by up to 93% in a dose-dependent manner [221]. These findings suggest that therapy not only lowers Lp(a) mass but also may directly mitigate its pathogenicity. Notably, these reductions in OxPL occurred without marked changes in systemic inflammatory markers such as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein or interleukin-6 in the trial timeframe. The consistency of this pharmacologic profile has been demonstrated globally, with a phase 1 study in a Chinese population confirming that single doses produced profound reductions (up to −99.2%) and a favorable safety profile aligning with other ethnic groups [222].
Lepodisiran is an investigational, long-acting GalNAc-conjugated siRNA designed to inhibit hepatic LPA transcription. Clinical data demonstrate its potent efficacy, with dose-dependent Lp(a) reductions of up to 97% and a durable effect that positions it as a promising candidate for annual or biannual dosing [223]. In a phase 1 single ascending-dose trial (NCT04914546), single subcutaneous doses produced profound, dose-dependent reductions in Lp(a), with the highest dose (608 mg) achieving a median maximal reduction of −97% and sustaining a −94% reduction at 337 d, alongside a favorable safety profile [224]. These promising results were strongly confirmed and refined by the larger, placebo-controlled phase 2 ALPACA trial (NCT05565742). Here, a single 400-mg dose produced a time-averaged Lp(a) reduction of −93.9% from day 60 to 180, and a 2-year regimen maintained a −94.8% reduction through 1 year, confirming its profile as a promising candidate for annual or biannual dosing [225].
Another potent GalNAc-conjugated siRNA, zerlasiran (SLN360), produces robust, sustained Lp(a) lowering. Initial human data from a phase 1/2 trial (NCT04606602) demonstrated its foundational promise, where 2 doses achieved near-complete median Lp(a) reductions of up to −99%, with effects persisting markedly for over 200 d postdose [226]. These results were confirmed and refined in a dedicated phase 2 trial (NCT05537571) in patients with ASCVD. Here, multiple dosing regimens (300 to 450 mg every 16 to 24 weeks) produced robust, time-averaged Lp(a) reductions of >80% over 36 weeks, confirming its profile for quarterly to biannual administration [227]. RNA-targeted therapies have shifted Lp(a) from an untreatable risk factor to a pharmacologically modifiable target, with potent siRNAs now undergoing definitive trials to confirm their clinical benefit. The rapid progress in this field has been recently reviewed, confirming that multiple RNA-targeted agents consistently achieve ≥80% Lp(a) reductions in phase 2 trials, with definitive cardiovascular outcome studies now underway [228].
The inhibition of ANGPTL3 via RNA therapeutics represents a novel strategy for managing complex dyslipidemia, with ASOs and siRNAs having distinct clinical narratives. Vupanorsen (ANGPT3-LRx), a GalNAc-conjugated ASO designed to inhibit hepatic ANGPTL3 synthesis, was evaluated in the phase IIb TRANSLATE-TIMI 70 trial. In statin-treated patients with mixed dyslipidemia, vupanorsen reduced non-HDL cholesterol by approximately 25% and TGs by 41% to 57%. However, it produced only modest reductions in LDL cholesterol and ApoB. The trial also raised safety concerns, including elevated liver enzymes and dose-dependent increases in hepatic fat content up to 76%, which led to the discontinuation of its development (NCT04516291) [229]. A dedicated analysis of the TRANSLATE-TIMI 70 trial further elucidated Vupanorsen’s mechanism, demonstrating that ANGPTL3 inhibition potently reduced atherogenic remains of cholesterol by 42% to 59% and VLDL-C by 52% to 67%, with the magnitude of reduction directly correlated with the degree of ANGPTL3 silencing [230].
Zodasiran, a GalNAc-conjugated siRNA, targets hepatic ANGPTL3 expression. Its efficacy and safety were assessed in a 24-week, phase IIb ARCHES-2 trial involving 204 individuals with mixed hyperlipidemia (NCT04832971) [231]. Zodasiran treatment produced dose-dependent reductions, with the 200-mg dose lowering TGs by >50%, non-HDL cholesterol by 36%, ApoB by 22%, and LDL cholesterol by 20%. Unlike the ANGPTL3-targeted ASO vupanorsen, zodasiran did not elevate liver enzymes or fat. However, it was associated with transient increases in glycated hemoglobin in some individuals with pre-existing diabetes at the highest dose. The development of zodasiran for mixed hyperlipidemia has been promoted by Arrowhead in favor of its APOC3-targeted candidate, plozasiran [209]. Beyond mixed hyperlipidemia, zodasiran has shown promise in homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH), a population with limited treatment options. The phase 2 GATEWAY trial reported LDL cholesterol reductions of approximately 35.7% to 39.9% at month 6 in patients with HoFH, with even greater reductions (55.8%) observed in those also receiving concomitant PCSK9 inhibitor therapy, supporting its potential in this high-risk population [232].
Solbinsiran, a GalNAc-conjugated siRNA, an ANGPTL3 inhibitor, progressed to a phase II trial of interest following its promising evaluation in earlier preclinical and phase I studies (NCT04644809) [233]. The durability and safety of solbinsiran were evaluated in PROLONG-ANG3 (NCT05256654), a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase II trial. The study revealed a dose-dependent effect on the primary endpoint. Compared with the placebo, the 400-mg dose administered on days 0 and 90 produced a significant reduction in ApoB on day 180 (−14.3%, P = 0.0085), whereas the effects of the 100- and 800-mg doses did not reach statistical significance. Treatment was generally well tolerated, with a lower incidence of adverse events in the solbinsiran group (44% to 60%) than in the placebo group (65%). The study concluded that solbinsiran 400 mg effectively reduces ApoB and is well tolerated, although its effect on cardiovascular outcomes remains to be determined [234]. A recent editorial commentary on the PROLONG-ANG3 trial highlights the dual effect of solbinsiran on both TG-rich remnants and LDL particles, its favorable hepatic safety profile with potential benefits on hepatic steatosis, and the practical advantage of quarterly subcutaneous dosing, while noting that the inconsistent dose response and short follow-up limit long-term conclusions [235]. Thus, the therapeutic targeting of ANGPTL3 has evolved from a hepatotoxic ASO to safer, durable siRNA candidates, which now await definitive outcome trials to confirm their clinical potential in cardiovascular risk reduction. Meta-analytic data further demonstrated that ANGPTL3-targeted siRNAs provide broader lipid modulation, reducing TGs by 52% and LDL-C by 13.2%, while also decreasing HDL-C by approximately 20%, a differential effect distinct from APOC3-targeted agents [212]. Collectively, the clinical development and regulatory status of leading siRNA and ASO therapies for dyslipidemia are summarized in Table 1.
The evolution of lipid-lowering therapy can be viewed as a series of revolutionary advances (Fig. 5). Statins and ezetimibe, which inhibit cholesterol synthesis and absorption, respectively, represented the first revolution, dramatically reducing LDL-C and cardiovascular events. The second revolution came with PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies, which provided profound LDL-C lowering on top of statins. The third revolution was marked by ACLY inhibitors such as bempedoic acid, offering an oral alternative for statin-intolerant patients. Now, RNA-targeted therapeutics, including siRNAs (e.g., inclisiran and plozasiran), ASOs (e.g., olezarsen and pelacarsen), anti-miR agents, and mRNA-LNP-based in vivo base editing (e.g., VERVE-101/102), constitute the fourth revolution. These modalities achieve durable gene silencing or permanent genetic correction with infrequent dosing, promising to address residual cardiovascular risk more effectively than ever before.
Moving beyond the transient modulation of proteins by small molecules, RNA platforms, specifically ASOs and siRNAs, enable precise, durable silencing of disease-causing genes at their transcriptional origin. As this review has detailed, the clinical validation of this approach, exemplified by inclisiran for PCSK9, is now being powerfully extended to other genetically validated targets, such as APOC3, Lp(a), and ANGPTL3, with agents such as plozasiran, olezarsen, olpasiran, and lepodisiran demonstrating profound, long-lasting reductions in key atherogenic lipids. The success of this first generation of cardiovascular RNA-targeted drugs rests on the foundational innovation of GalNAc conjugation, which facilitates efficient, hepatocyte-specific delivery via the ASGPR. This technology has transformed the therapeutic landscape for hepatic targets, offering the dual benefit of exceptional efficacy and infrequent dosing schedules (quarterly to biannually), which promises to overcome the adherence challenges that limit the real-world effectiveness of daily oral therapies. However, the very success of this liver-centric strategy highlights a critical frontier for the field.
The next phase of RNA-targeted therapeutics for lipid-driven ASCVD may extend beyond hepatic lipid regulation toward the modulation of vascular inflammation and plaque biology. Looking further ahead, while GalNAc-conjugated RNAs have established efficient and durable liver targeting for genes such as PCSK9, APOC3, ANGPTL3, and Lp(a), addressing residual cardiovascular risk will require extrahepatic delivery to immune and vascular cells that drive plaque progression. Emerging nanoparticle platforms, particularly LNPs, are being explored for their potential to deliver nucleic acid therapeutics directly to hepatocytes and vascular cells involved in lipid metabolism [126,236]. LNPs offer a versatile platform capable of delivering not only siRNA to silence disease-causing genes [e.g., targeting PCSK9, ANGPTL3, APOC3, or Lp(a)] but also mRNAs to express therapeutic proteins, opening new avenues for treating dyslipidemia and atherosclerosis [237,238]. The 2026 ACC Scientific Statement on Gene Editing Therapy in Cardiovascular Disease underscores the clinical readiness of these approaches, particularly for hepatically expressed targets such as PCSK9, ANGPTL3, and Lp(a), while also highlighting the need for long-term safety monitoring, equitable access, and ethical implementation [131]. These delivery advances will enable rational combination therapies, in which RNA-targeted agents are integrated with statins or other lipid-modifying interventions to achieve synergistic and durable risk reduction. However, efficient and safe extrahepatic delivery remains a major technical challenge, and most strategies are currently in preclinical or early translational stages. Complementing these delivery efforts, recent systematic screens have prioritized novel, causal targets for CVD, thereby mapping a concrete pipeline for the next generation of RNA-targeted therapies [239]. A recently published comprehensive review further highlights the rapidly expanding landscape of mRNA-based biotechnologies for CVDs, including mRNA modifications, delivery platforms, genome and epigenomic editing, and chimeric antigen receptor engineering for immune cell therapy, with preclinical and clinical applications in hypercholesterolemia, atherosclerosis, cardiac injury, fibrosis, and amyloidosis [240]. In parallel, targeting inflammatory transcriptional programs within plaque-resident cells could potentially expand RNA-targeted therapeutics beyond lipid lowering toward modulation of vascular disease processes, potentially positioning them as an important component of future precision therapies of ASCVD. A projected timeline of anticipated milestones for RNA-targeted therapeutics in lipid metabolic disorders is shown in Fig. 6. We can envisage more RNA-targeted drugs against hypercholesterolemia and ASCVD will emerge in the decades to come.
1.
Surendran A, Zhang H, Stamenkovic A, Ravandi A.Lipidomics and cardiovascular disease. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA) - Mol Basis Dis. 2025;1871(5):Article 167806.
2.
Wazir M, Olanrewaju OA, Yahya M, Kumari J, Kumar N, Singh J, Al-Itbi AY, Kumari K, Ahmed A, Islam T, et al.Lipid disorders and cardiovascular risk: A comprehensive analysis of current perspectives. Cureus. 2023;15(12):Article e51395.
3.
Esmaeili P, Roshanravan N, Ghaffari S, Mesri Alamdari N, Asghari-Jafarabadi M.Unraveling atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk factors through conditional probability analysis with Bayesian networks: Insights from the AZAR cohort study. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):4361.
4.
Simioni A, Jeniann AY, Imran R, Dua A.A systematic review of disparities in the medical management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in females. Semin Vasc Surg. 2023;36(4):517–530.
5.
Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risks 2023 Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2023. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025;86(22):2167–2243.
6.
Lee YJ, Lee SJ, Kim JW, Lee SH, Kim GS, Park JH, Cho JM, Kang WC, Yoon HJ, Kim WH, et al.Intensive LDL cholesterol targeting in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2026;394(14):1365–1375.
7.
Xu S, Liu Y, Zhu M, Chen K, Xu F, Liu Y.Global burden of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease attributed to lifestyle and metabolic risks. Sci China Life Sci. 2025;68(9):2739–2754.
8.
Steinbeck JE, Iannotti RA, Rasheed A.Dysregulated lipid metabolism as a central driver of atherosclerotic plaque pathology. Lipidology. 2025;2(4):17.
9.
Mensah GA, Arnold N, Prabhu SD, Ridker PM, Welty FK.Inflammation and cardiovascular disease: 2025 ACC scientific statement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025.
10.
Abuhassan Q, Saeed TN, Al-Hussainy AF, Patel JR, Jamuna KV, Tripathi V, Sahoo S, Bainsal N, Polatova D, Sameer HN, et al.Beyond cholesterol: Targeting inflammatory biomarkers in cardiovascular disease. Clin Chim Acta. 2026;Article 120966.
11.
Ajoolabady A, Pratico D, Lin L, Mantzoros CS, Bahijri S, Tuomilehto J, Ren J.Inflammation in atherosclerosis: Pathophysiology and mechanisms. Cell Death Dis. 2024;15(11):817.
12.
Jebari-Benslaiman S, Galicia-García U, Larrea-Sebal A, Olaetxea JR, Alloza I, Vandenbroeck K, Benito-Vicente A, Martín C.Pathophysiology of atherosclerosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(6):3346.
13.
Kavita S, Dorairaj P.Apolipoprotein B—An ideal biomarker for atherosclerosis? Indian Heart J. 2024;76:S121–S129.
14.
Mhaimeed O, Burney ZA, Schott SL, Kohli P, Marvel FA, Martin SS.The importance of LDL-C lowering in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease prevention: Lower for longer is better. Am J Prevent Cardiol. 2024;18:Article 100649.
15.
Mortensen MB, Dzaye O, Bøtker HE, Jensen JM, Maeng M, Bentzon JF, Kanstrup H, Sørensen HT, Leipsic J, Blankstein R, et al.Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol is predominantly associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events in patients with evidence of coronary atherosclerosis: The Western Denmark Heart Registry. Circulation. 2023;147(14):1053–1063.
16.
Batty M, Bennett MR, Yu E.The role of oxidative stress in atherosclerosis. Cells. 2022;11(23):Article 3843.
17.
Yang B, Hang S, Xu S, Gao Y, Yu W, Zang G, Zhang L, Wang Z.Macrophage polarisation and inflammatory mechanisms in atherosclerosis: Implications for prevention and treatment. Heliyon. 2024;10(11):Article e32073.
18.
Gerhardt T, Haghikia A, Stapmanns P, Leistner DM.Immune mechanisms of plaque instability. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:Article 797046.
19.
Alonso-Herranz L, Albarrán-Juárez J, Bentzon JF.Mechanisms of fibrous cap formation in atherosclerosis. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023;10:1254114.
20.
Safarova M, Bimal T, Soffer DE, Hirsh B, Shapiro MD, Mintz G, Cha A, Gianos E.Advances in targeting LDL cholesterol: PCSK9 inhibitors and beyond. Am J Prev Cardiol. 2024;19:Article 100701.
21.
Li X, Li Z-F, Wu N-Q.Remnant cholesterol and residual risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025;26(2):Article 25985.
22.
Kim JY, Kim NH.New therapeutic approaches to the treatment of dyslipidemia 1: ApoC-III and ANGPTL3. J Lipid Atheroscler. 2023;12(1):23–36.
23.
Hussain A, Sun C, Selvin E, Nambi V, Coresh J, Jia X, Ballantyne CM, Hoogeveen RC.Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, apolipoprotein C-III, angiopoietin-like protein 3, and cardiovascular events in older adults: Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2022;29(2):e53–e64.
24.
Mansoor T, Nambi V, Parikh S, Misra A, Ismayl M, Sullivan C, Sperling L, Virani SS, Rifai MA, Koshy SK, et al.Targeting triglycerides: The rise of apolipoprotein C3 and angiopoietin-like protein 3 inhibitors. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2025;25(6):749–766.
25.
Chapman MJ, Packard CJ, Björnson E, Ginsberg HN, Borén J.Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, remnants and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: What we know and what we need to know. Atherosclerosis. 2025;410:Article 120529.
26.
Razavi AC, Shapiro MD.The discovery of PCSK9 as a pivotal point in the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Am J Prev Cardiol. 2025;24:Article 101314.
27.
Fang S, Deng C, Zhao R.Lipoprotein(a) and high-risk coronary plaques: Mechanisms, characteristics, and emerging therapeutic strategies. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025;26(10):44003.
28.
Akyol O, Yang CY, Woodside DG, Chiang HH, Chen CH, Gotto AM.Comparative analysis of atherogenic lipoproteins L5 and Lp(a) in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2024;26(7):317–329.
29.
Singh SS, van der Toorn JE, Sijbrands EJ, de Rijke YB, Kavousi M, Bos D.Lipoprotein(a) is associated with a larger systemic burden of arterial calcification. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023;24(8):1102–1109.
30.
Gordts PL, Nock R, Son NH, Ramms B, Lew I, Gonzales JC, Thacker BE, Basu D, Lee RG, Mullick AE, et al.ApoC-III inhibits clearance of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins through LDL family receptors. J Clin Invest. 2016;126(8):2855–2866.
31.
Catapano AL, Pirillo A, Tokgozoglu L.Apolipoprotein C3 and cardiovascular risk: New insights from the ODYSSEY outcomes trial. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2025;Article zwaf202.
32.
Pan BY, Chen CS, Chen FY, Shen MY.Multifaceted role of apolipoprotein C3 in cardiovascular disease risk and metabolic disorder in diabetes. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(23):12759.
33.
Tsimikas S.Anti-apoC-III therapies and implications for treatment of pancreatitis and cardiovascular disease. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2025;27(1):103.
34.
Vahdat-Lasemi F, Farhoudi L, Hosseinikhah SM, Santos RD, Sahebkar A.Angiopoietin-like protein inhibitors: Promising agents for the treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia and atherogenic dyslipidemia. Atherosclerosis. 2025;405:Article 119235.
35.
Ling P, Zheng X, Luo S, Ge J, Xu S, Weng J.Targeting angiopoietin-like 3 in atherosclerosis: From bench to bedside. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021;23(9):2020–2034.
36.
Kaplan R, Zhang T, Hernandez M, Gan FX, Wright SD, Waters MG, Cai TQ.Regulation of the angiopoietin-like protein 3 gene by LXR. J Lipid Res. 2003;44(1):136–143.
37.
Cicero AF, Mahjoubin-Tehran M, Reiner Ž, Eid AH, Jamialahmadi T, Sahebkar A.From physiopathology to treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia: Existing and emerging pharmacotherapies. Pharmacol Rev. 2026;78(2):Article 100110.
38.
Landmesser U, Poller W, Tsimikas S, Most P, Paneni F, Lüscher TF.From traditional pharmacological towards nucleic acid-based therapies for cardiovascular diseases. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(40):3884–3899.
39.
Tamargo J, Agewall S, Borghi C, Ceconi C, Cerbai E, Dan GA, Ferdinandy P, Grove EL, Rocca B, Sulzgruber P, et al.New pharmacological agents and novel cardiovascular pharmacotherapy strategies in 2022. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2023;9(4):353–370.
40.
Sang A, Zhuo S, Bochanis A, Manautou JE, Bahal R, Zhong XB, Rasmussen TP.Mechanisms of action of the US Food and Drug Administration-approved antisense oligonucleotide drugs. BioDrugs. 2024;38(4):511–526.
41.
Hu B, Zhong L, Weng Y, Peng L, Huang Y, Zhao Y, Liang XJ.Therapeutic siRNA: State of the art. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020;5(1):101.
42.
Yan Y, Liu S, Wen J, He Y, Duan C, Nabavi N, Ashrafizadeh M, Sethi G, Liu L, Ma R.Advances in RNA-based cancer therapeutics: Pre-clinical and clinical implications. Mol Cancer. 2025;24(1):251.
43.
Debacker AJ, Voutila J, Catley M, Blakey D, Habib N.Delivery of oligonucleotides to the liver with GalNAc: From research to registered therapeutic drug. Mol Ther. 2020;28(8):1759–1771.
44.
Cui H, Zhu X, Li S, Wang P, Fang J.Liver-targeted delivery of oligonucleotides with N-acetylgalactosamine conjugation. ACS Omega. 2021;6(25):16259–16265.
45.
Wołowiec Ł, Osiak J, Wołowiec A, Wijata A, Grześk E, Kozakiewicz M, Banach J, Nowaczyk A, Nowaczyk J, Grześk G.Inclisiran—Safety and effectiveness of small interfering RNA in inhibition of PCSK-9. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(2):Article 323.
46.
Tsimikas S.RNA-targeted therapeutics for lipid disorders. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2018;29(6):459–466.
47.
Kosmas CE, Bousvarou MD, Tsamoulis D, Gianniou M, Papakonstantinou EJ, Rallidis LS.Novel RNA-based therapies in the management of dyslipidemias. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26(3):Article 1026.
48.
Jiang SY, Li H, Tang JJ, Wang J, Luo J, Liu B, Wang JK, Shi XJ, Cui HW, Tang J, et al.Discovery of a potent HMG-CoA reductase degrader that eliminates statin-induced reductase accumulation and lowers cholesterol. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):5138.
49.
Ferri N, Ruscica M, Fazio S, Corsini A.Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-lowering drugs: A narrative review. J Clin Med. 2024;13(4):943.
50.
Brown MS, Goldstein JL.A receptor-mediated pathway for cholesterol homeostasis. Science. 1986;232(4746):34–47.
51.
Ray KK, Molemans B, Schoonen WM, Giovas P, Bray S, Kiru G, Murphy J, Banach M, De Servi S, Gaita D, et al.EU-wide cross-sectional observational study of lipid-modifying therapy use in secondary and primary care: The DA VINCI study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2021;28(11):1279–1289.
52.
Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, Koskinas KC, Casula M, Badimon L, Chapman MJ, De Backer GG, Delgado V, Ference BA, et al.2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: Lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(1):111–188.
53.
Xu W, Lee AL, Lam CL, Danaei G, Wan EY.Benefits and risks associated with statin therapy for primary prevention in old and very old adults: Real-world evidence from a target trial emulation study. Ann Intern Med. 2024;177(6):701–710.
54.
Vell MS, Loomba R, Krishnan A, Wangensteen KJ, Trebicka J, Creasy KT, Trautwein C, Scorletti E, Seeling KS, Hehl L, et al.Association of statin use with risk of liver disease, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver-related mortality. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(6):Article e2320222.
55.
Cannon CP, Blazing MA, Giugliano RP, McCagg A, White JA, Theroux P, Darius H, Lewis BS, Ophuis TO, Jukema JW, et al.Ezetimibe added to statin therapy after acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(25):2387–2397.
56.
Ouchi Y, Sasaki J, Arai H, Yokote K, Harada K, Katayama Y, Urabe T, Uchida Y, Hayashi M, Yokota N, et al.Ezetimibe lipid-lowering trial on prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in 75 or older (EWTOPIA 75): A randomized, controlled trial. Circulation. 2019;140(12):992–1003.
57.
Mansfield BS, Dello-Iacono A, Raal FJ.Ezetimibe in the management of homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. J Clin Lipidol. 2025;19(2):320–326.
58.
Phan BA, Dayspring TD, Toth PP.Ezetimibe therapy: Mechanism of action and clinical update. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2012;8:415–427.
59.
Awad K, Mikhailidis DP, Katsiki N, Muntner P, Banach M, Lipid and Blood Pressure Meta-Analysis Collaboration (LBPMC) Group.Effect of ezetimibe monotherapy on plasma lipoprotein(a) concentrations in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Drugs. 2018;78(4):453–462.
60.
Bhagavathula AS, Al Matrooshi NO, Clark CC, Rahmani J.Bempedoic acid and ezetimibe for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized phase II/III trials. Clin Drug Investig. 2021;41(1):19–28.
61.
Kim BK, Hong SJ, Lee YJ, Hong SJ, Yun KH, Hong BK, Heo JH, Rha SW, Cho YH, Lee SJ, et al.Long-term efficacy and safety of moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe combination therapy versus high-intensity statin monotherapy in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (RACING): A randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2022;400(10349):380–390.
62.
Giugliano RP, Cannon CP, Blazing MA, Nicolau JC, Corbalán R, Špinar J, Park JG, White JA, Bohula EA, Braunwald E.Benefit of adding ezetimibe to statin therapy on cardiovascular outcomes and safety in patients with versus without diabetes mellitus: Results from IMPROVE-IT (Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial). Circulation. 2018;137(15):1571–1582.
63.
Laufs U, Karmann B, Pittrow D.Atorvastatin treatment and LDL cholesterol target attainment in patients at very high cardiovascular risk. Clin Res Cardiol. 2016;105(9):783–790.
64.
Nissen SE, Lincoff AM, Brennan D, Ray KK, Mason D, Kastelein JJ, Thompson PD, Libby P, Cho L, Plutzky J, et al.Bempedoic acid and cardiovascular outcomes in statin-intolerant patients. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(15):1353–1364.
65.
Nissen SE, Menon V, Nicholls SJ, Brennan D, Laffin L, Ridker P, Ray KK, Mason D, Kastelein JJ, Cho L, et al.Bempedoic acid for primary prevention of cardiovascular events in statin-intolerant patients. JAMA. 2023;330(2):131–140.
66.
Paponja K, Pećin I, Reiner Ž, Banach M.Bempedoic acid: New evidence and recommendations on use. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2024;35(1):41–50.
67.
Manniello M, Pisano M.Alirocumab (Praluent): First in the new class of PCSK9 inhibitors. P T. 2016;41(1):28–53.
68.
Ma H, Ma W, Liu Y, Chen L, Ding P.Effects of alirocumab and evolocumab on cardiovascular mortality and LDL-C: Stratified according to the baseline LDL-C levels. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025;26(4):26980.
69.
Sabatine MS, Giugliano RP, Wiviott SD, Raal FJ, Blom DJ, Robinson J, Ballantyne CM, Somaratne R, Legg J, Wasserman SM, et al.Efficacy and safety of evolocumab in reducing lipids and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(16):1500–1509.
70.
Sabatine MS, Giugliano RP, Keech AC, Honarpour N, Wiviott SD, Murphy SA, Kuder JF, Wang H, Liu T, Wasserman SM, et al.Evolocumab and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(18):1713–1722.
71.
Schwartz GG, Steg PG, Szarek M, Bhatt DL, Bittner VA, Diaz R, Edelberg JM, Goodman SG, Hanotin C, Harrington RA, et al.Alirocumab and cardiovascular outcomes after acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(22):2097–2107.
72.
Raone L, Gritti V, Mandurino-Mirizzi A, Sparasci FM, Scotti V, Currao A, Colonna G, Ferlini M, De Luca L.Efficacy of PCSK9 inhibitors on clinical outcomes in patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: A network meta-analysis. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2026;26(2):193–203.
73.
Cleto AS, Schirlo JM, Machozeki J, Martins CM.Alirocumab versus evolocumab on cardiovascular outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2026;22(1):e1573403X357542.
74.
Li X, Wang Z, Liang J, Li B, Meng Q.Therapeutic effects of PCSK9 inhibitors on Lp(a)-associated atherosclerosis: Evidence and perspectives. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2026;87(4):229–241.
75.
Ruscica M, Bertoletti A, Gobbi C, Sirtori CR, Carugo S, Corsini A.Lipid-lowering approaches to manage statin-intolerant patients. Eur Heart J Suppl. 2024;26(Suppl 1):i56–i59.
76.
Huo Y, Chen B, Lian Q, Wang S, Liu L, Lu D, Qu Y, Zheng G, Li L, Ji Y, et al.Tafolecimab in Chinese patients with non-familial hypercholesterolemia (CREDIT-1): A 48-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023;41:Article 100907.
77.
Navar AM, Mikhailova E, Catapano AL, Banka P, Blom DJ, Cadena A, Kourpanidis S, Lepor NE, Tsukamoto K, Mendizabal G, et al.A placebo-controlled trial of the oral PCSK9 inhibitor enlicitide. N Engl J Med. 2026;394(6):529–539.
78.
Schoonjans K, Staels B, Auwerx J.The peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPARS) and their effects on lipid metabolism and adipocyte differentiation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1996;1302(2):93–109.
79.
Goto H, Iseri K, Hida N.Fibrates and the risk of cardiovascular outcomes in chronic kidney disease patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2024;39(6):1016–1022.
80.
ACCORD Study Group. Effects of combination lipid therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(17):1563–1574.
81.
Das Pradhan A, Glynn RJ, Fruchart JC, MacFadyen JG, Zaharris ES, Everett BM, Campbell SE, Oshima R, Amarenco P, Blom DJ, et al.Triglyceride lowering with pemafibrate to reduce cardiovascular risk. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(21):1923–1934.
82.
Bays HE, Braeckman RA, Ballantyne CM, Kastelein JJ, Otvos JD, Stirtan WG, Soni PN.Icosapent ethyl, a pure EPA omega-3 fatty acid: Effects on lipoprotein particle concentration and size in patients with very high triglyceride levels (the MARINE study). J Clin Lipidol. 2012;6(6):565–572.
83.
Ballantyne CM, Bays HE, Kastelein JJ, Stein E, Isaacsohn JL, Braeckman RA, Soni PN.Efficacy and safety of eicosapentaenoic acid ethyl ester (AMR101) therapy in statin-treated patients with persistent high triglycerides (from the ANCHOR study). Am J Cardiol. 2012;110(7):984–992.
84.
Bhatt DL, Steg PG, Miller M, Brinton EA, Jacobson TA, Ketchum SB, Doyle RT Jr, Juliano RA, Jiao L, Granowitz C, et al.Cardiovascular risk reduction with icosapent ethyl for hypertriglyceridemia. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(1):11–22.
85.
Aggarwal R, Bhatt DL, Steg PG, Miller M, Brinton EA, Dunbar RL, Ketchum SB, Tardif JC, Martens FM, Ballantyne CM, et al.Cardiovascular outcomes with icosapent ethyl by baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: A secondary analysis of the REDUCE-IT randomized trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2025;14(5):Article e038656.
86.
Curfman G, Shehada E.Icosapent ethyl: Scientific and legal controversies. Open Heart. 2021;8(1):Article e001616.
87.
Virani SS, Newby LK, Arnold SV, Bittner V, Brewer LC, Demeter SH, Dixon DL, Fearon WF, Hess B, Johnson HM, et al.2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline for the management of patients with chronic coronary disease: A report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2023;148(9):e9–e119.
88.
Orringer CE, Jacobson TA, Maki KC.National Lipid Association Scientific Statement on the use of icosapent ethyl in statin-treated patients with elevated triglycerides and high or very-high ASCVD risk. J Clin Lipidol. 2019;13(6):860–872.
89.
Lansberg P, Lee A, Lee ZV, Subramaniam K, Setia S.Nonadherence to statins: Individualized intervention strategies outside the pill box. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2018;14:91–102.
90.
Kulkarni JA, Witzigmann D, Thomson SB, Chen S, Leavitt BR, Cullis PR, Van Der Meel R.The current landscape of nucleic acid therapeutics. Nat Nanotechnol. 2021;16(6):630–643.
91.
Kliegman M, Zaghlula M, Abrahamson S, Esensten JH, Wilson RC, Urnov FD, Doudna JA.A roadmap for affordable genetic medicines. Nature. 2024;634(8033):307–314.
92.
Thi HV, Thi LA, Tang TL, Chu DT.Biosafety and regulatory issues of RNA therapeutics. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2024;204:311–329.
93.
Ranjbar S, Zhong XB, Manautou J, Lu X.A holistic analysis of the intrinsic and delivery-mediated toxicity of siRNA therapeutics. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2023;201:Article 115052.
94.
Ames EG, Borja NA, Butterfield RJ, Donald DR, Jarnes JR, Porter JM, Sapp KL, Ueng CS, Wang T, Cohen JL.Institutional readiness for novel therapeutics: A framework for multidisciplinary integration. Mol Genet Metab. 2025;146(1):Article 109214.
95.
Khorkova O, Wahlestedt C.The long-awaited solution for personalized medicine. Front Sci. 2025;3:Article 1629021.
96.
Peng Y, Liu A, Zhu Q, Liu X, Cai B, Yan Z, Gao J, Zhu R, Wang C.Advances in the regulation of lipid metabolism by non-coding RNAs. Animals. 2025;15(17):2621.
97.
Sallam T, van Solingen C, Moore KJ.Non-coding RNAs in lipid metabolism and their roles in atherosclerosis. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2026;23(5):324–345.
98.
Zhang X, Price NL, Fernández-Hernando C.Non-coding RNAs in lipid metabolism. Vasc Pharmacol. 2019;114:93–102.
99.
Najafi-Shoushtari SH, Kristo F, Li Y, Shioda T, Cohen DE, Gerszten RE, Näär AM.MicroRNA-33 and the SREBP host genes cooperate to control cholesterol homeostasis. Science. 2010;328(5985):1566–1569.
100.
Horie T, Ono K, Horiguchi M, Nishi H, Nakamura T, Nagao K, Kinoshita M, Kuwabara Y, Marusawa H, Iwanaga Y, et al.MicroRNA-33 encoded by an intron of sterol regulatory element-binding protein 2 (Srebp2) regulates HDL in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(40):17321–17326.
101.
Rayner KJ, Esau CC, Hussain FN, McDaniel AL, Marshall SM, van Gils JM, Ray TD, Sheedy FJ, Goedeke L, Liu X, et al.Inhibition of miR-33a/b in non-human primates raises plasma HDL and lowers VLDL triglycerides. Nature. 2011;478(7369):404–407.
102.
Rayner KJ, Fernandez-Hernando C, Moore KJ.MicroRNAs regulating lipid metabolism in atherogenesis. Thromb Haemost. 2012;107(4):642–647.
103.
Horie T, Baba O, Nishino T, Yamashita Y, Tsujisaka Y, Ono K.Critical role of microRNA-33a/b in cardiovascular and metabolic disease: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic perspectives. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2026;33(1):13–19.
104.
Esau C, Davis S, Murray SF, Yu XX, Pandey SK, Pear M, Watts L, Booten SL, Graham M, R MK, et al.miR-122 regulation of lipid metabolism revealed by in vivo antisense targeting. Cell Metab. 2006;3(2):87–98.
105.
Hsu SH, Wang B, Kota J, Yu J, Costinean S, Kutay H, Yu L, Bai S, La Perle K, Chivukula RR, et al.Essential metabolic, anti-inflammatory, and anti-tumorigenic functions of miR-122 in liver. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(8):2871–2883.
106.
Zinkhan EK, Yu B, Schlegel A.Prenatal exposure to a maternal high fat diet increases hepatic cholesterol accumulation in intrauterine growth restricted rats in part through microRNA-122 inhibition of Cyp7a1. Front Physiol. 2018;9:645.
107.
Tang Y, Gao Z, Yang J, Li C, Wang W, Wu C, Wu M, Li M, Wu H, Sun Y, et al.Breaking the synergism of iron overload and miR-122 to rescue lipid accumulation and peroxidation in MASLD. Pharmacol Res. 2025;215:Article 107728.
108.
Goedeke L, Rotllan N, Canfrán-Duque A, Aranda JF, Ramírez CM, Araldi E, Lin CS, Anderson NN, Wagschal A, De Cabo R, et al.MicroRNA-148a regulates LDL receptor and ABCA1 expression to control circulating lipoprotein levels. Nat Med. 2015;21(11):1280–1289.
109.
Wang N, He L, Lin H, Tan L, Sun Y, Zhang X, Danser AJ, Lu HS, He Y, Lu X.MicroRNA-148a regulates low-density lipoprotein metabolism by repressing the (pro)renin receptor. PLOS ONE. 2020;15(5):Article e0225356.
110.
Rotllan N, Price N, Pati P, Goedeke L, Fernández-Hernando C.microRNAs in lipoprotein metabolism and cardiometabolic disorders. Atherosclerosis. 2016;246:352–360.
111.
Rotllan N, Zhang X, Canfrán-Duque A, Goedeke L, Griñán R, Ramírez CM, Suárez Y, Fernández-Hernando C.Antagonism of miR-148a attenuates atherosclerosis progression in APOB(TG)Apobec(-/-)Ldlr(+/-) mice: A brief report. Biomed Pharmacother. 2022;153:Article 113419.
112.
Li T, Liu L, Zhu K, Luo Y, Huang X, Dong Y, Huang J.Biomimetic microRNAs-selenium-nanocomposites for targeted and combined hyperlipidemia therapy. Adv Healthc Mater. 2024;13(16):Article e2400064.
113.
Krützfeldt J, Rajewsky N, Braich R, Rajeev KG, Tuschl T, Manoharan M, Stoffel M.Silencing of microRNAs in vivo with ‘antagomirs’. Nature. 2005;438(7068):685–689.
114.
Rayner KJ, Sheedy FJ, Esau CC, Hussain FN, Temel RE, Parathath S, Van Gils JM, Rayner AJ, Chang AN, Suarez Y, et al.Antagonism of miR-33 in mice promotes reverse cholesterol transport and regression of atherosclerosis. J Clin Invest. 2011;121(7):2921–2931.
115.
Yamamoto T, Mukai Y, Wada F, Terada C, Kayaba Y, Oh K, Yamayoshi A, Obika S, Harada–Shiba M.Highly potent GalNAc-conjugated tiny LNA anti-miRNA-122 antisense oligonucleotides. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13(6):Article 817.
116.
Sallam T, Jones MC, Gilliland T, Zhang L, Wu X, Eskin A, Sandhu J, Casero D, Vallim TQ, Hong C, et al.Feedback modulation of cholesterol metabolism by the lipid-responsive non-coding RNA LeXis. Nature. 2016;534(7605):124–128.
117.
Park JG, Kim G, Jang SY, Lee YR, Lee E, Lee HW, Han MH, Chun JM, Han YS, Yoon JS, et al.Plasma long noncoding RNA LeXis is a potential diagnostic marker for non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis. Life. 2020;10(10):Article 230.
118.
Zhang S, Li L, Wang J, Zhang T, Ye T, Wang S, Xing D, Chen W.Recent advances in the regulation of ABCA1 and ABCG1 by lncRNAs. Clin Chim Acta. 2021;516:100–110.
119.
Daghistani H, Hegazy GA, Alkhalofah M, Alsobeihy A, Nasser S, Gad H, Shamrani T, Mufrrih M, Alyousfi D.Long noncoding RNAs in familial hypercholesterolemia: Biomarkers, therapeutics, and AI in precision medicine. Lipids Health Dis. 2025;24(1):182.
120.
Simion V, Haemmig S, Feinberg MW.LncRNAs in vascular biology and disease. Vasc Pharmacol. 2019;114:145–156.
121.
Josefs T, Boon RA.The long non-coding road to atherosclerosis. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2020;22(10):55.
122.
Sallam T, Jones M, Thomas BJ, Wu X, Gilliland T, Qian K, Eskin A, Casero D, Zhang Z, Sandhu J, et al.Transcriptional regulation of macrophage cholesterol efflux and atherogenesis by a long noncoding RNA. Nat Med. 2018;24(3):304–312.
123.
Hennessy EJ, van Solingen C, Scacalossi KR, Ouimet M, Afonso MS, Prins J, Koelwyn GJ, Sharma M, Ramkhelawon B, Carpenter S, et al.The long noncoding RNA CHROME regulates cholesterol homeostasis in primate. Nat Metab. 2019;1(1):98–110.
124.
Paez I, Prado Y, Ubilla CG, Zambrano T, Salazar LA.Atorvastatin increases the expression of long non-coding RNAs ARSR and CHROME in hypercholesterolemic patients: A pilot study. Pharmaceuticals. 2020;13(11):Article 382.
125.
Parhiz H, Atochina-Vasserman EN, Weissman D.mRNA-based therapeutics: Looking beyond COVID-19 vaccines. Lancet. 2024;403(10432):1192–1204.
126.
Talemi MN, Farani MR, Eskandani NA, Mirzaee D, Alipourfard I, Huh YS.Programmable lipid nanoparticles for RNA therapeutics: Design principles and clinical translation. Mater Today Bio. 2026;37:Article 102774.
127.
Lee RG, Mazzola AM, Braun MC, Platt C, Vafai SB, Kathiresan S, Rohde E, Bellinger AM, Khera AV.Efficacy and safety of an investigational single-course CRISPR base-editing therapy targeting PCSK9 in nonhuman primate and mouse models. Circulation. 2023;147(3):242–253.
128.
Oostveen RF, Khera AV, Kathiresan S, Stroes ES, Fitzgerald K, Harms MJ, Oakes BL, Kastelein JJ.New approaches for targeting PCSK9: Small-interfering ribonucleic acid and genome editing. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2023;43(7):1081–1092.
129.
Vafai S, Karsten V, Jensen C, Falzone R, Lister T, Stolz L, Khera A, Kathiresan S, Bellinger A, Fiedorek F.Abstract 4139206: Design of Heart-2: A phase 1b clinical trial of VERVE-102, an in vivo base editing medicine delivered by a GalNAc-LNP and targeting PCSK9 to durably lower LDL cholesterol. Circulation. 2024;150(Suppl_1):A4139206.
130.
Flight P, Rohde E, Lee R, Mazzola AM, Platt C, Mizoguchi T, Pendino K, Chadwick A, Khera A, Vafai S, et al.VERVE-102, a clinical stage in vivo base editing medicine, leads to potent and precise inactivation of PCSK9 in preclinical studies. J Clin Lipidol. 2025;19(3):Article e68.
131.
Ambardekar AV, Bhatt A, Hoekstra M, Kelly MA, Musunuru K, Natarajan P.Gene editing therapy in cardiovascular disease: 2026 ACC scientific statement: A report of the American College of Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2026.
132.
Zhou Y, Jiang Y, Chen SJ.RNA–ligand molecular docking: Advances and challenges. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci. 2022;12(3):Article e1571.
133.
Sponer J, Bussi G, Krepl M, Banáš P, Bottaro S, Cunha RA, Gil-Ley A, Pinamonti G, Poblete S, Jurecka P, et al.RNA structural dynamics as captured by molecular simulations: A comprehensive overview. Chem Rev. 2018;118(8):4177–4338.
134.
Burnett JC, Rossi JJ.RNA-based therapeutics: Current progress and future prospects. Chem Biol. 2012;19(1):60–71.
135.
Xiao B et al.Development, opportunities, and challenges of siRNA nucleic acid drugs. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2025;36(1):Article 102437.
136.
Zhang M, Zhang C.Preferential cleavage of upstream targets in concatenated miRNA/siRNA target sites support a 5'-3' scanning model for RISC target recognition. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2024;703:Article 149662.
137.
A randomized, parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging, phase 2b study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of AZD8233 treatment in participants with dyslipidemia. 2020. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04641299
138.
Downward J.RNA interference. BMJ. 2004;328(7450):1245–1248.
139.
Kei T, Kate EG.RNA-based controllers for engineering gene and cell therapies. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2024;85:Article 103026.
140.
Grabow W, Jaeger L.RNA modularity for synthetic biology. F1000Prime Rep. 2013;5:46.
141.
Ray KK, Wright RS, Kallend D, Koenig W, Leiter LA, Raal FJ, Bisch JA, Richardson T, Jaros M, Wijngaard PL, et al.Two phase 3 trials of Inclisiran in patients with elevated LDL cholesterol. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(16):1507–1519.
142.
Adams D, Tournev IL, Taylor MS, Coelho T, Planté-Bordeneuve V, Berk JL, González-Duarte A, Gillmore JD, Low SC, Sekijima Y, et al.Efficacy and safety of vutrisiran for patients with hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis with polyneuropathy: A randomized clinical trial. Amyloid. 2023;30(1):18–26.
143.
Qin ZX, Zuo L, Zeng Z, Ma R, Xie W, Zhu X, Zhou X.GalNac-siRNA conjugate delivery technology promotes the treatment of typical chronic liver diseases. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2025;22(4):455–469.
144.
Yafang Z et al.Advancement of drugs conjugated with GalNAc in the targeted delivery to hepatocytes based on asialoglycoprotein receptor. Carbohydr Res. 2025;552:Article 109426.
145.
Springer AD, Dowdy SF.GalNAc-siRNA conjugates: Leading the way for delivery of RNAi therapeutics. Nucleic Acid Ther. 2018;28(3):109–118.
146.
Gilbert Ashwell: Sweet on science. Nat Med. 2008;14(6):608.
147.
Nair JK, Willoughby JL, Chan A, Charisse K, Alam MR, Wang Q, Hoekstra M, Kandasamy P, Kel’in AV, Milstein S, et al.Multivalent N-acetylgalactosamine-conjugated siRNA localizes in hepatocytes and elicits robust RNAi-mediated gene silencing. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136(49):16958–16961.
148.
Huang Y.Preclinical and clinical advances of GalNAc-decorated nucleic acid therapeutics. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2017;6:116–132.
149.
Olofsson SO, Boren J.Apolipoprotein B: A clinically important apolipoprotein which assembles atherogenic lipoproteins and promotes the development of atherosclerosis. J Intern Med. 2005;258(5):395–410.
150.
Dashti N.The effect of low density lipoproteins, cholesterol, and 25-hydroxycholesterol on apolipoprotein B gene expression in HepG2 cells. J Biol Chem. 1992;267(10):7160–7169.
151.
Tsimikas S.A test in context: Lipoprotein(a): Diagnosis, prognosis, controversies, and emerging therapies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(6):692–711.
152.
Stitziel NO, Khera AV, Wang X, Bierhals AJ, Vourakis AC, Sperry AE, Natarajan P, Klarin D, Emdin CA, Zekavat SM, et al.ANGPTL3 deficiency and protection against coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(16):2054–2063.
153.
Lambert G, Sjouke B, Choque B, Kastelein JJ, Hovingh GK.The PCSK9 decade. J Lipid Res. 2012;53(12):2515–2524.
154.
Perry CM, Balfour JAB.Fomivirsen. Drugs. 1999;57(3):375–380.
155.
Gragoudas ES, Adamis AP, Cunningham ET Jr, Feinsod M, Guyer DR.Pegaptanib for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(27):2805–2816.
156.
Dowling JJ.Eteplirsen therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: Skipping to the front of the line. Nat Rev Neurol. 2016;12(12):675–676.
157.
Honor A, Rudnick SR, Bonkovsky HL.Givosiran to treat acute porphyria. Drugs Today. 2021;57(1):47–59.
158.
Scott LJ, Keam SJ.Lumasiran: First approval. Drugs. 2021;81(2):277–282.
159.
Syed YY.Nedosiran: First approval. Drugs. 2023;83(18):1729–1733.
160.
Syed YY. Donidalorsen: First approval. Drugs. 2026;86(2):243–248.
161.
Toth PP.Emerging LDL therapies: Mipomersen—Antisense oligonucleotide therapy in the management of hypercholesterolemia. J Clin Lipidol. 2013;7(3):S6–S10.
162.
Richardson PG, Riches ML, Kernan NA, Brochstein JA, Mineishi S, Termuhlen AM, Arai S, Grupp SA, Miloslavsky M, Nejadnik B, et al.Defibrotide for hepatic veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome with multi-organ dysfunction: A concordance analysis between day+100 complete response and survival. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016;22(3):S351.
163.
Wilkinson MJ, Bajaj A, Brousseau ME, Taub PR.Harnessing RNA interference for cholesterol lowering: The bench-to-bedside story of Inclisiran. J Am Heart Assoc. 2024;13(6):Article e032031.
164.
FDA approves triglyceride-lowering siRNA drug. Nat Biotechnol. 2025;43(12):1896–1896.
165.
Blom DJ, Marais AD, Moodley R, van der Merwe N, van Tonder A, Raal FJ.RNA-based therapy in the management of lipid disorders: A review. Lipids Health Dis. 2022;21(1):41.
166.
Zimbru RI, Zimbru EL, Bojin FM, Haidar L, Andor M, Harich OO, Tănasie G, Tatu C, Mailat DE, Zbîrcea IM, et al.Connecting the dots: How microRNAs link asthma and atherosclerosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26(8):3570.
167.
Artimovič P, Špaková I, Macejková E, Pribulová T, Rabajdová M, Mareková M, Zavacká M.The ability of microRNAs to regulate the immune response in ischemia/reperfusion inflammatory pathways. Genes Immun. 2024;25(4):277–296.
168.
Greco S, Gaetano C, Mazzaccaro D, Martelli F.Circular RNA role in atherosclerosis development and progression. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2025;27(1):60.
169.
Sasso JM, Ambrose BJ, Tenchov R, Datta RS, Basel MT, DeLong RK, Zhou QA.The progress and promise of RNA medicine—An arsenal of targeted treatments. J Med Chem. 2022;65(10):6975–7015.
170.
Weingärtner A, Bethge L, Weiss L, Sternberger M, Lindholm MW.Less is more: Novel hepatocyte-targeted siRNA conjugates for treatment of liver-related disorders. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2020;21:242–250.
171.
Katsiki N, Vrablik M, Banach M, Gouni-Berthold I.Inclisiran, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and lipoprotein (a). Pharmaceuticals. 2023;16(4):Article 577.
172.
Landmesser U, Thum T, Tokgözoğlu L, Guzik TJ, Cosentino F, Hajjar R, Goncalves A, Laguna-Fernandez A, Nioi P, Prochaska JH, et al.Pharmacotherapy of cardiovascular diseases from herbs and pills to nucleic acids. Eur Heart J. 2025;Article ehaf520.
173.
Feng Z, Liao X, Peng J, Quan J, Zhang H, Huang Z, Yi B.PCSK9 causes inflammation and cGAS/STING pathway activation in diabetic nephropathy. FASEB J. 2023;37(9):Article e23127.
174.
Zhang XY, Lu QQ, Li YJ, Shi SR, Ma CN, Miao M, Guo SD.Conditional knockdown of hepatic PCSK9 ameliorates high-fat diet-induced liver inflammation in mice. Front Pharmacol. 2025;16:1528250.
175.
Frank-Kamenetsky M, Grefhorst A, Anderson NN, Racie TS, Bramlage B, Akinc A, Butler D, Charisse K, Dorkin R, Fan Y, et al.Therapeutic RNAi targeting PCSK9 acutely lowers plasma cholesterol in rodents and LDL cholesterol in nonhuman primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105(33):11915–11920.
176.
Crosby J, Peloso GM, Auer PL, Crosslin DR, Stitziel NO, Lange LA, Lu Y, Tang ZZ, Zhang H, Hindy G, et al.Loss-of-function mutations in APOC3, triglycerides, and coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(1):22–31.
177.
Jørgensen AB, Frikke-Schmidt R, Nordestgaard BG, Tybjærg-Hansen A.Loss-of-function mutations in APOC3 and risk of ischemic vascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(1):32–41.
178.
Qamar A, Khetarpal SA, Khera AV, Qasim A, Rader DJ, Reilly MP.Plasma apolipoprotein C-III levels, triglycerides, and coronary artery calcification in type 2 diabetics. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015;35(8):1880–1888.
179.
Chebli J, Larouche M, Gaudet D.APOC3 siRNA and ASO therapy for dyslipidemia. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2024;31(2):70–77.
180.
Prakash TP, Mullick AE, Riney S, Yu J, Nikan M, Quirk C, Crutchfield A, Damle SS, Klein S, Swayze EE.Discovery of long-acting APOC3 siRNA for treating patients with hypertriglyceridemia. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025;53(20):Article gkaf1063.
181.
Chen MJ, Xu YT, Sun L, Wang ZH, Little PJ, Wang L, Xian XD, Weng JP, Xu SW.A novel mouse model of familial combined hyperlipidemia and atherosclerosis. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2024;45(6):1316–1320.
182.
Tian Z, Luo H, Chu Y, Liu Y, Gao S, Song L, Yang Z, Liu D.Prediction of interspecies translation for targeting delivery coefficients of GalNAc-siRNA silencing apolipoprotein C-III using a mechanistic minimal physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2025;64(6):865–883.
183.
Lim GB.Novel siRNA reduces plasma lipoprotein(a) levels. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2022;19(3):147–147.
184.
Koren MJ, Moriarty PM, Baum SJ, Neutel J, Hernandez-Illas M, Weintraub HS, Florio M, Kassahun H, Melquist S, Varrieur T, et al.Preclinical development and phase 1 trial of a novel siRNA targeting lipoprotein(a). Nat Med. 2022;28(1):96–103.
185.
Rider DA, Eisermann M, Löffler K, Aleku M, Swerdlow DI, Dames S, Hauptmann J, Morrison E, Lindholm MW, Schubert S, et al.Pre-clinical assessment of SLN360, a novel siRNA targeting LPA, developed to address elevated lipoprotein (a) in cardiovascular disease. Atherosclerosis. 2022;349:240–247.
186.
Yang X, Liu Q, Shi S, Pan L, Cai G, He T, Huang C, Wu L, Huang J, Fang J.RN026: A lipoprotein(a) targeting siRNA with superior efficacy, extended duration and excellent safety profiles. J Clin Lipidol. 2025;19(3):Article e115.
187.
Xu YX, Redon V, Yu H, Querbes W, Pirruccello J, Liebow A, Deik A, Trindade K, Wang X, Musunuru K, et al.Role of angiopoietin-like 3 (ANGPTL3) in regulating plasma level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Atherosclerosis. 2018;268:196–206.
188.
Wang J, Zheng W, Zheng S, Yuan Y, Wen W, Cui W, Xue L, Sun X, Shang H, Zhang H, et al.Targeting ANGPTL3 by GalNAc-conjugated siRNA ANGsiR10 lowers blood lipids with long-lasting and potent efficacy in mice and monkeys. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2023;31:68–77.
189.
Supplee JG, Marmorstein R, Wellen KE.Molecular targets of bempedoic acid and related decoy fatty acids. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2025;36(10):917–928.
190.
Feng X, Zhang L, Xu S, Shen AZ.ATP-citrate lyase (ACLY) in lipid metabolism and atherosclerosis: An updated review. Prog Lipid Res. 2020;77:Article 101006.
191.
Chen M, Little PJ, Kong S, Banach M, Weng J, Xu S.Aclysiran, an RNAi therapeutic agent targeting ACLY, treats hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerosis in ApoE (-/-) mice. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2024;14(12):5505–5508.
192.
Jiang H, Liao Y, Zhu M, Jiramonai L, Wu H, Zhong Y, Xie Z, Liang XJ.Innovative atherosclerosis models: Advancing pathophysiology and translational research. Research. 2025;8:0617.
193.
Sabatine MS, Laufs U.Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors: Past, present, and future. Eur Heart J. 2026;Article ehag148.
194.
Lamb YN.Inclisiran: First approval. Drugs. 2021;81(3):389–395.
195.
Migliorati JM, Jin J, Zhong XB.siRNA drug Leqvio (inclisiran) to lower cholesterol. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2022;43(5):455–456.
196.
Ray KK, Landmesser U, Leiter LA, Kallend D, Dufour R, Karakas M, Hall T, Troquay RP, Turner T, Visseren FL, et al.Inclisiran in patients at high cardiovascular risk with elevated LDL cholesterol. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(15):1430–1440.
197.
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial, assessing the impact of inclisiran on major adverse cardiovascular events in participants with established cardiovascular disease (VICTORION-2 PREVENT). 2021. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05030428
198.
Wiegman A, Peterson AL, Bruckert E, Defesche JC, Schweizer A, Bergeron J, Chueca MJ, van Lennep JE, Santos RD, Schwab KO, et al.Efficacy and safety of inclisiran in adolescents with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (ORION-16): A two-part, randomised, multicentre clinical trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2026;14(3):233–242.
199.
Alaíz ÁR, Gudino LC, de la Isla LP, Pardo HG, Calle DG, Miramontes-Gonzalez JP.Inclisiran: Efficacy in real world-systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2025;14(12):Article 4163.
200.
Fu Q, Hu L, Shen T, Yang R, Jiang L.Recent advances in gene therapy for familial hypercholesterolemia: An update review. J Clin Med. 2022;11(22):Article 6773.
201.
Chan DC, Watts GF.The promise of PCSK9 and lipoprotein(a) as targets for gene silencing therapies. Clin Ther. 2023;45(11):1034–1046.
202.
Taskinen MR, Packard CJ, Borén J.Emerging evidence that ApoC-III inhibitors provide novel options to reduce the residual CVD. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2019;21(8):27.
203.
Paik J, Duggan S.Volanesorsen: First global approval. Drugs. 2019;79(12):1349–1354.
204.
Witztum JL, Gaudet D, Freedman SD, Alexander VJ, Digenio A, Williams KR, Yang Q, Hughes SG, Geary RS, Arca M, et al.Volanesorsen and triglyceride levels in familial chylomicronemia syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(6):531–542.
205.
Gouni-Berthold I, Alexander VJ, Yang Q, Hurh E, Steinhagen-Thiessen E, Moriarty PM, Hughes SG, Gaudet D, Hegele RA, O’Dea LS, et al.Efficacy and safety of volanesorsen in patients with multifactorial chylomicronaemia (COMPASS): A multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021;9(5):264–275.
206.
Alexander VJ, Xia S, Hurh E, Hughes SG, O’Dea L, Geary RS, Witztum JL, Tsimikas S.N-acetyl galactosamine-conjugated antisense drug to APOC3 mRNA, triglycerides and atherogenic lipoprotein levels. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(33):2785–2796.
207.
Joshy J, Javed A, Singh MK, Singh BP, Kumar R, Hussain S, Singh M.Olezarsen: A next-generation antisense therapy for hypertriglyceridemia and familial chylomicronemia syndrome. Cureus. 2025;17(11):Article e96715.
208.
Stroes ES, Alexander VJ, Karwatowska-Prokopczuk E, Hegele RA, Arca M, Ballantyne CM, Soran H, Prohaska TA, Xia S, Ginsberg HN, et al.Olezarsen, acute pancreatitis, and familial chylomicronemia syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2024;390(19):1781–1792.
209.
Ballantyne CM, Vasas S, Azizad M, Clifton P, Rosenson RS, Chang T, Melquist S, Zhou R, Mushin MA, Leeper NJ, et al.Plozasiran, an RNA interference agent targeting APOC3, for mixed hyperlipidemia. N Engl J Med. 2024;391(10):899–912.
210.
Gaudet D, Pall D, Watts GF, Nicholls SJ, Rosenson RS, Modesto K, San Martin J, Hellawell J, Ballantyne CM.Plozasiran (ARO-APOC3) for severe hypertriglyceridemia: The SHASTA-2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2024;9(7):620–630.
211.
Watts GF, Rosenson RS, Hegele RA, Goldberg IJ, Gallo A, Mertens A, Baass A, Zhou R, Muhsin MA, Hellawell J, et al.Plozasiran for managing persistent chylomicronemia and pancreatitis risk. N Engl J Med. 2025;392(2):127–137.
212.
Gao Y, Bai Y, Mu X, Pang X.Efficacy and safety of small interfering RNA (siRNA) therapies for hypertriglyceridemia and mixed dyslipidemia: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pharmacol. 2026;17:1736821.
213.
Ma GS, Schwartz GG, Olsson AG, Willeit P, Tsimikas S, Yeang C.Abstract 11456: Elevated lipoprotein(a) is associated with statin resistance. Circulation. 2021;144(Suppl_1):A11456.
214.
de Boer LM, Oorthuys AO, Wiegman A, Langendam MW, Kroon J, Spijker R, Zwinderman AH, Hutten BA.Statin therapy and lipoprotein(a) levels: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2022;29(5):779–792.
215.
Anchouche K, Baass A, Thanassoulis G.Lp(a): A clinical review. Clin Biochem. 2025;137:Article 110929.
216.
Blumenthal RS, Morris PB, Gaudino M, Johnson HM, Anderson TS, Bittner VA, Blankstein R, Brewer LC, Cho L, de Ferranti SD, et al.2026 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of dyslipidemia: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2026.
217.
Bhatia HS, Bajaj A, Goonewardena SN, Moriarty PM.Pelacarsen: Mechanism of action and Lp(a)-lowering effect. J Clin Lipidol. 2025;19(5):1208–1222.
218.
Cho L, Nicholls SJ, Nordestgaard BG, Landmesser U, Tsimikas S, Blaha MJ, Leitersdorf E, Lincoff AM, Lesogor A, Manning B, et al.Design and rationale of Lp(a)HORIZON trial: Assessing the effect of lipoprotein(a) lowering with pelacarsen on major cardiovascular events in patients with CVD and elevated Lp(a). Am Heart J. 2025;287:1–9.
219.
Sharma K, Kattamuri L, Mukherjee D.Lipoprotein(a) lowering with pelacarsen (TQJ230). Cardiovasc Hematol Disord Drug Targets. 2025.
220.
O’Donoghue ML, Rosenson RS, López JA, Lepor NE, Baum SJ, Stout E, Gaudet D, Knusel B, Kuder JF, Murphy SA, et al.The off-treatment effects of olpasiran on lipoprotein(a) lowering: OCEAN(a)-DOSE extension period results. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024;84(9):790–797.
221.
Rosenson RS, López JA, Gaudet D, Baum SJ, Stout E, Lepor NE, Park JG, Murphy SA, Knusel B, Wang J, et al.Olpasiran, oxidized phospholipids, and systemic inflammatory biomarkers: Results from the OCEAN(a)-DOSE trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2025;10(5):482–486.
222.
Sohn W, Tan KC, Shah T, Du Y, Wang J, Zhang S, Flach S, Ward J.An open-label, single-dose study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability of olpasiran in Chinese participants with elevated serum lipoprotein(a). Clin Ther. 2025;47(10):851–858.
223.
Kattamuri L, Sharma K, Mukherjee D.Lepodisiran: Effects on lipoprotein(a) and cardiovascular outcomes in adults with elevated Lp(a). Cardiovasc Hematol Disord Drug Targets. 2025.
224.
Nissen SE, Linnebjerg H, Shen X, Wolski K, Ma X, Lim S, Michael LF, Ruotolo G, Gribble G, Navar AM, et al.Lepodisiran, an extended-duration short interfering RNA targeting lipoprotein(a): A randomized dose-ascending clinical trial. JAMA. 2023;330(21):2075–2083.
225.
Nissen SE, Ni W, Shen X, Wang Q, Navar AM, Nicholls SJ, Wolski K, Michael L, Haupt A, Krege JH.Lepodisiran—A long-duration small interfering RNA targeting lipoprotein(a). N Engl J Med. 2025;392(17):1673–1683.
226.
Nissen SE et al.Single ascending and multiple-dose trial of zerlasiran, a short interfering RNA targeting lipoprotein(a): A randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2024;331(18):1534–1543.
227.
Nissen SE, Wolski K, Watts GF, Koren MJ, Fok H, Nicholls SJ, Rider DA, Cho L, Romano S, Melgaard C, et al.Zerlasiran—A small-interfering RNA targeting lipoprotein(a): A phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2024;332(23):1992–2002.
228.
Zhang J, Navar AM, Tokgozoglu L.Lipoprotein(a)-lowering therapies: A promising future. Eur Heart J. 2026;Article ehag092.
229.
Bergmark BA, Marston NA, Bramson CR, Curto M, Ramos V, Jevne A, Kuder JF, Park JG, Murphy SA, Verma S, et al.Effect of vupanorsen on non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in statin-treated patients with elevated cholesterol: TRANSLATE-TIMI 70. Circulation. 2022;145(18):1377–1386.
230.
Zimerman A, Wiviott SD, Park JG, Murphy SA, Ran X, Bramson CR, Curto M, Ramos V, Jevne A, Kuder JF, et al.Reductions in remnant cholesterol and VLDL cholesterol through inhibition of ANGPTL3 protein synthesis: An analysis from the TRANSLATE-TIMI 70 trial. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2024;31(10):1216–1223.
231.
Rosenson RS, Gaudet D, Hegele RA, Ballantyne CM, Nicholls SJ, Lucas KJ, San Martin J, Zhou R, Muhsin MA, Chang T, et al.Zodasiran, an RNAi therapeutic targeting ANGPTL3, for mixed hyperlipidemia. N Engl J Med. 2024;391(10):913–925.
232.
Raal FJ, Bergeron J, Gaudet D, Rosenson RS, Sullivan DR, Turner T, Hegele RA, Ballantyne CM, Knowles JW, Leeper NJ, et al.Zodasiran, an RNAi therapeutic targeting ANGPTL3, for treating patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (GATEWAY): An open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2026;14(2):123–136.
233.
Ray KK, Linnebjerg H, Michael LF, Shen X, Ma X, Lim S, Zhen EY, Dudek H, Abrams M, Saxena U, et al.Effect of ANGPTL3 inhibition with solbinsiran in preclinical and early human studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025;85(19):1803–1818.
234.
Ray KK, Oru E, Rosenson RS, Jones J, Ma X, Walgren J, Haupt A, Verma S, Gaudet D, Nicholls SJ, et al.Durability and efficacy of solbinsiran, a GalNAc-conjugated siRNA targeting ANGPTL3, in adults with mixed dyslipidaemia (PROLONG-ANG3): A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2025;405(10489):1594–1607.
235.
Llop D, Ray KK.Solbinsiran, a durable GalNAc-conjugated siRNA targeting ANGPTL3 in adults with mixed dyslipidaemia (PROLONG-ANG3): Lessons from a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Cardiovasc Res. 2026;Article cvag045.
236.
Ren Z, Zhou J, Yang D, Guo Y, Zhang J, Xu J, Chen YE.Gene editing therapies targeting lipid metabolism for cardiovascular disease: Tools, delivery strategies, and clinical progress. Cells. 2026;15(2):134.
237.
Saadh MJ, Allela OQ, Kareem RA, Padmapriya G, Mishra A, Kazmi SW, Prasad GV, Sameer HN, Hamad AK, Athab ZH, et al.Advances in nanostructured drug delivery systems for cardiovascular therapeutics. DARU J Pharmaceut Sci. 2025;34(1):2.
238.
Soroudi S, Jaafari MR, Arabi L.Lipid nanoparticle (LNP) mediated mRNA delivery in cardiovascular diseases: Advances in genome editing and CAR T cell therapy. J Control Release. 2024;372:113–140.
239.
Wang Z, Chen S, Zhang F, Akhmedov S, Weng J, Xu S.Prioritization of lipid metabolism targets for the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Research. 2025;8:0618.
240.
Zhou Z, Chen W, Yu H, Tabas I, Foo RS, Tao W.mRNA medicine for cardiovascular disease. Nat Cardiovasc Res. 2026;5:291–307.
241.
Marston NA, Bergmark BA, Alexander VJ, Prohaska TA, Kang YM, Moura FA, Zimerman A, Waldman E, Weinland J, Murphy SA, et al.Olezarsen for managing severe hypertriglyceridemia and pancreatitis risk. N Engl J Med. 2026;394(5):429–441.
Year 2026 volume 9 Issue 5
PDF
113
61
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.34133/research.1288
  • Receive Date:2026-02-10
  • Online Date:2026-10-16
  • Published:2026-05-20
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2026-02-10
  • Revised:2026-04-24
  • Accepted:2026-04-27
Affiliations
    1Key Laboratory for Biorheological Science and Technology of Ministry of Education, State and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory for Vascular Implants, College of Bioengineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China.
    2Institute of Panvascular Biology, JinFeng Laboratory, Chongqing 401329, China.
    3State Key Laboratory of Mechanism and Quality of Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Macau, SAR, China.
    4Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230001, China.
    5Anhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Metabolic Health and Panvascular Diseases, Hefei 230001, China.

Corresponding:

* Address correspondence to: (G.W.);
* Address correspondence to: (S.X.)
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/research/EN/10.34133/research.1288
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT