To explore cross-system mechanisms of the MGBA, we further integrated multimodal datasets to identify how interactions across systems jointly shape symptomatology and cognitive function. In extending this framework to SZ, we examined the multidimensional associations between the gut microbiome and brain imaging features, uncovering potential interactions underlying disease manifestations (Fig.
6A). At the genus level, we observed markedly reduced abundances of
Ruminococcus and
Roseburia and an increased abundance of
Veillonella in SZ patients. Consistently, MRI analyses revealed decreased GMV and ReHo, together with increased ALFF across multiple brain regions. Gut microbial α-diversity was significantly linked to both measures, and ReHo in the right superior temporal cortex, left cuneus, and right middle temporal gyrus was negatively associated with the abundance of
Roseburia [
51]. To further explore the connection between the MGBA and psychiatric symptoms, we performed mediation analysis using gut microbiome as the independent variable. Node properties from 7 brain regions, mainly in visual, language, and motor systems (Fig.
6B), significantly mediated the association between
Selinomonas abundance and PANSS scores in SZ patients [
52]. In terms of data integration, we established, for the first time, an individualized brain–gut–microbiome network (BGMN) by combining multimodal MRI features with gut microbiome profiles. This model achieved high accuracy in distinguishing SZ patients from HC. Among the most discriminative features,
Faecalibacterium was associated with MRI-derived features in visual and subcortical regions, while
Collinsella correlated with the default mode and subcortical networks (Fig.
6C). Additionally, working memory performance was positively associated with the connectivity between the right inferior parietal lobule and
Collinsella, suggesting the potential of BGMN for biomarker discovery in SZ [
53]. Leveraging brain–gut network methodology, we further developed a multi-omics graph convolutional network (MO-GCN) and incorporated an attention mechanism to more effectively integrate multi-omics features. The best classification accuracy reached 84.0%. Interpretability analysis showed that the most informative brain features were primarily related to memory and emotional regulation, such as those in the hippocampus and olfactory cortex, while the key microbial features were mainly from
Dorea and
Ruminococcus. These important features were significantly associated with clinical disease severity and cognitive function [
54] (Fig.
6D). Moreover, to address the marked heterogeneity of SZ, we employed a data-driven approach to identify distinct multi-omics subtypes across brain, gut, and brain–gut integrated features. The results revealed that brain and brain–gut subtypes were more strongly associated with symptom profiles, while gut-derived subtypes exhibited closer links to cognitive function (Fig.
6E), highlighting the multilayered heterogeneity of SZ and offering potential pathways for precision diagnosis and treatment [
55]. Building upon the multi-omics phenotyping that reveals the multi-layered heterogeneity of SZ, we further extend our analytical framework to the biological age dimension. Recently, we constructed a biological age prediction model using MRI, gut microbiome, and blood-based data. Unlike traditional single-modality biological age estimates, the multimodal approach substantially improved prediction accuracy. Patients with SZ showed a markedly increased biological age gap, which was closely associated with cognitive impairment and disease severity (Fig.
6F), highlighting its potential value in psychiatric assessment [
56]. Finally, by integrating gut microbiome profiles, blood-based biomarkers, and EEG network features into a unified multi-omics framework, we substantially improved the diagnostic performance for SZ. The optimized model achieved an accuracy of 91.7% and an AUC of 96.5%. Notably, the most informative features spanned multiple biological domains, including microbial genera (e.g.,
Lactobacillus and
Prevotella), peripheral biomarkers (SOD and immune cell ratios), and EEG-derived measures of nodal efficiency and local network integration within temporal and frontoparietal regions [
57] (Fig.
6G). In studies on MDD, recent research has uncovered a critical coupling mechanism between cognitive impairment in first-episode MDD and gut microbiome dysbiosis. Notably,
Amycolatopsis sp. Hca4 exhibits significant correlations with cognitive abilities such as processing speed. It influences working memory by modulating functional connectivity between the medial frontal gyrus and parahippocampal gyrus, suggesting that specific microorganisms may serve as pivotal nodes regulating abnormal brain networks and cognitive impairment [
58]. These findings highlight the key role of gut–brain interactions in understanding, diagnosing, and treating major psychiatric disorders.