As a biomarker of cellular stress, GDF15 is up-regulated rapidly and chronically through various mechanisms in the presence of stress stimuli induced by nutritional imbalances, alcohol, hypoxia, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, and amino acid starvation [
2,
6,
25]. These stress stimuli activate key regulators of the integrated stress response (ISR), where eIF2α phosphorylation serves as the central regulatory node. This posttranslational modification enhances activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4) translation, which subsequently dimerizes with C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP) to form a transcriptionally active complex that directly modulates GDF15 promoter activity [
19,
26,
27]. Additionally, stress-responsive transcription factors such as p53 and early growth response transcription factor 1 (EGR1) also serve as critical regulators of GDF15 expression [
28–
30]. Structurally, the GDF15 promoter contains 2 functional p53-binding sites that enable the cellular stress response [
29]. Notably, in head and neck cancer cells, GDF15 forms a positive feedback loop with EGR1. EGR1 directly activates GDF15 transcription through promoter binding, while GDF15 reciprocally up-regulates EGR1 expression via autocrine signaling [
31]. Under oxidative stress conditions, NRF2 serves as a master regulator that transcriptionally controls GDF15 expression through direct promoter interaction [
32]. In a cysteine deficiency model, rapid glutathione depletion markedly up-regulates NRF2 in the liver and muscle, triggering oxidative stress. This, cooperatively with the ISR, induces the up-regulation of FGF21 and GDF15 [
33]. A study on liver injury demonstrated that hepatic estrogen-related receptor γ (ERRγ) directly binds to and activates the promoter region of
GDF15, thereby regulating
GDF15 expression during hepatic damage [
34]. During metabolic liver disease progression, particularly at the critical transition stage from metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MASLD) to MASH, hepatic stress signaling activates transcription factors TFEB and DDIT3 to cooperatively regulate
Gdf15 transcription [
35]. Animal studies demonstrate that dual knockdown of TFEB and DDIT3 in hepatocytes markedly reduces hepatic
Gdf15 mRNA expression and circulating GDF15 protein levels in choline-deficient, L-amino acid-defined (CDAA) diet-induced mouse models [
35]. Adenosine monophosphate (AMP)-activated protein kinase (AMPK), a key regulator of cellular energy balance, influences GDF15 expression through mechanisms linked to energy stress [
36]. Activation of AMPK, either via increased AMP/ATP (adenosine triphosphate) ratios or pharmacological agents, has been shown to up-regulate GDF15 levels in liver and serum [
37]. This effect is partially dependent on the AMPK β1-isoform and appears independent of the unfolded protein response (UPR) [
36]. This study emphasizes the role of AMPK in stress adaptation and metabolic regulation. Further research is needed to explore their relevance and identify the key tissues contributing to elevated circulating levels of GDF15. Another study indicated that GDF15 regulates AMPK activation. GDF15 deficiency leads to activation of the TGF-β1/SMAD3 signaling pathway, thereby reducing AMPK phosphorylation via protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) [
38]. Furthermore, studies have found a positive feedback regulation between AMPK and GDF15. Metformin up-regulates GDF15 expression via the AMPK/ATF3 pathway. The up-regulated GDF15, in turn, enables AMPK to achieve full activation under metformin treatment [
39]. In addition, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) can directly regulate GDF15 expression at the transcriptional level, whereas PPARβ/δ-mediated increase in GDF15 requires the involvement of AMPK and p53 [
37,
40]. Epigenetic regulation involves the methyltransferase EZH2, which represses GDF15 transcription by catalyzing trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 27 (H3K27me3) and forming inhibitory chromatin structures at the promoter region [
41]. In terms of posttranscriptional modification, CNOT6L, the catalytic subunit of the CCR4-NOT deadenylase complex, can lead to increased degradation of GDF15 transcripts by targeting the 3′ poly(A) tail of GDF15 mRNA [
42]. Moreover, in mitochondrial myopathy progression, both GDF15 and FGF21 are markedly up-regulated by the integrated mitochondrial stress response (ISRmt), serving as molecular signatures of this disease [
43]. Further highlighting the link between cellular energy stress and GDF15 induction, a study in mice with liver-specific oxidative phosphorylation (OxPhos) dysfunction indicated that activation of the mitochondrial stress response could lead to secretion of GDF15 [
44]. Collectively, in Fig.
2, we integrate the multilayered regulatory network governing GDF15 expression under cellular stress conditions, including core mechanisms of transcriptional activation, signaling pathway crosstalk, epigenetic modification, and posttranscriptional regulation.