收藏切换
Electrocatalytic Lignin Valorization into Aromatic Products via Oxidative Cleavage of Cα−Cβ Bonds
收藏切换
PDF
Jianing Xu1, Juan Meng3, Yi Hu1, Yongzhuang Liu1, Yuhan Lou1, Wenjing Bai1, Shuo Dou1, *, Haipeng Yu1, *, Shuangyin Wang2, *
Research. Vol 6 Article ID 0288
Less
收藏切换
Research. Vol 6 Article ID 0288
• Research Article •
Electrocatalytic Lignin Valorization into Aromatic Products via Oxidative Cleavage of Cα−Cβ Bonds
Full
Jianing Xu1, Juan Meng3, Yi Hu1, Yongzhuang Liu1, Yuhan Lou1, Wenjing Bai1, Shuo Dou1, *, Haipeng Yu1, *, Shuangyin Wang2, *
Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory of Bio-based Material Science and Technology of Ministry of Education, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China.
  • 2State Key Laboratory of Chem/Bio-Sensing and Chemometrics, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China.
  • 3School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou 213001, China.
Published: 2023-12-20 doi: 10.34133/research.0288
Outline
收藏切换

Lignin is the most promising candidate for producing aromatic compounds from biomass. However, the challenge lies in the cleavage of C−C bonds between lignin monomers under mild conditions, as these bonds have high dissociation energy. Electrochemical oxidation, which allows for mild cleavage of C−C bonds, is considered an attractive solution. To achieve low-energy consumption in the valorization of lignin, the use of highly efficient electrocatalysts is essential. In this study, a meticulously designed catalyst consisting of cobalt-doped nickel (oxy)hydroxide on molybdenum disulfide heterojunction was developed. The presence of molybdenum in a high valence state promoted the adsorption of tert-butyl hydroperoxide, leading to the formation of critical radical intermediates. In addition, the incorporation of cobalt doping regulated the electronic structure of nickel, resulting in a lower energy barrier. As a result, the heterojunction catalyst demonstrated a selectivity of 85.36% for cleaving the Cα−Cβ bond in lignin model compound, achieving a substrate conversion of 93.69% under ambient conditions. In addition, the electrocatalyst depolymerized 49.82 wt% of soluble fractions from organosolv lignin (OL), resulting in a yield of up to 13 wt% of aromatic monomers. Significantly, the effectiveness of the prepared electrocatalyst was also demonstrated using industrial Kraft lignin (KL). Therefore, this research offers a practical approach for implementing electrocatalytic oxidation in lignin refining.

Jianing Xu, Juan Meng, Yi Hu, Yongzhuang Liu, Yuhan Lou, Wenjing Bai, Shuo Dou, Haipeng Yu, Shuangyin Wang. Electrocatalytic Lignin Valorization into Aromatic Products via Oxidative Cleavage of Cα−Cβ Bonds[J]. Research, 2023 , 6 (12) : 0288 - . DOI: 10.34133/research.0288
Natural biomass has been emerged as an important candidate to face the anthropogenic climate change and resource depletion crisis caused by the excessive consumption of traditional fossil resources [1–4]. A wide variety of sustainable chemicals, materials, fuels, drug intermediates, etc. could be produced from biomass through facile and mild strategies [5,6]. Lignin as a main component of plant cell walls is the only one with aromatic molecular structures. Hence, it has been placed great expectations in biomass refining to alleviate the dependence on fossil energy [7–9]. This heterogeneous aromatic macromolecule composed of 3 major monolignols, i.e., p-coumaryl alcohol, coniferyl alcohol, and sinapyl alcohol, linked by C−C and C−O bonds [10,11]. Their high bond dissociation energy makes lignin highly difficult to chemically process [12,13]. Numerous research has focused on breaking lignin bonds to obtain high-value-added monomers through pyrolysis, hydrogenolysis, and enzymolysis, etc., but conventional approaches require harsh reaction conditions, high energy consumption, costly noble metal catalysts, and are usually associated with suboptimal efficiencies [14,15]. Therefore, a mild and efficient lignin upgrading strategy is urgently needed. Electrocatalytic oxidation is a sustainable depolymerization route for lignin due to its mild reaction conditions at ambient temperature and pressure, easily regulated reaction efficiency, and adjustable product selectivity via accurate potential and current control. It could also offer improved catalyst recyclability by electron transfer between the anode and cathode, which promotes the inner loop redox mechanism of catalytic reaction processes [16–18]. However, because of the complexity of reactant molecular structures and the sluggish electrochemical reaction kinetics, highly efficient and low-cost electrocatalysts are especially needed for selectively depolymerize lignin.
On the other hand, within the lignin, the β−O−4 structural units account for over 50% of all linkages, with Cα−Cβ bonds being more difficult to cleave than Cβ−O bonds due to their higher bond energy [19–21]. Therefore, directly cleaving C−C bonds presents a pivotal challenge to lignin valorization [22,23]. Previous works have confirmed that the dissociation energy of Cβ−O bonds can be reduced by preoxidizing benzylic alcohols at the Cα sites in lignin [24,25]. In contrast, the formation of Cβ radical intermediates is a key way to achieve Cα−Cβ bond cleavage. During this cleavage process, carbon-centered radical intermediates can be formed without substrate pretreatment, allowing lignin depolymerization to be induced in a gentle, clean, and controllable way [26,27]. In a recent study, Pt-based single-atom electrocatalyst was combined with tert-butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP) as free radical initiator and radical coupling partner to efficiently cleave the Cα−Cβ bonds of lignin [28,29]. The Pt atom anchored Cβ site in lignin to facilitate the formation of radical intermediates, followed by inducing a radical/radical crossover coupling pathway to weaken the bond dissociation energy, thus overcoming the barrier of Cα−Cβ bond cleavage. However, the high cost of noble metal-based materials and the complex catalyst preparation processes also restrict the industrial value-added utilization of lignin. In addition, the favorable adsorption and homolytic cleavage of the free radical initiator TBHP on catalyst surface would be also critical to facilitate the key step of radical intermediates formation during the reaction pathway. Thereinto, transition-metal-based materials such as Ni, Co, Cu, and Mn are widely used in electrocatalysis due to their high activities, abundant reserves, low price, and nontoxicity [30–32]. Ni-based catalysts have demonstrated their feasibility to electrocatalytically depolymerize lignin [33,34]. Simultaneously, as its adjacent element in the periodic table, Co owns similar ionic radius and electronegativity that could lead to better catalyst stability and enhance catalytic performance through precise regulation of electronic surroundings for Ni by doping [35–37].
In this work, we present an electrocatalytic oxidation approach to highly selective cleavage of Cα−Cβ bonds of lignin using a Mo@NiCoOOH heterojunction catalyst. To achieve this, 2-dimensional (2D) MoS2 was used as a sacrificial template due to the high atomic utilization and easy surface modification. This allowed better graft Ni and Co ions to form NiCo hydroxide on the surface. After electrochemical activation of the NiCo hydroxide–MoS2 preelectrocatalyst under oxidation potential, unsplit heterojunction structures were formed with trace amounts of Mo- and Co-doped NiOOH. Mo existed in a high valence state, which promoted the adsorption of TBHP to form critical radicals, i.e., tBuO· and OH· under electrocatalysis. The dopant Co atoms regulated the electronic structure of Ni by providing interaction between Co2+ and bridging O2− via π-donation [38], weakening the e−–e− repulsion between Ni2+ and the O2−, eventually promoting partial charge transfer from Ni2+ to Co2+, and inducing a remarkable increase in Ni3+ that acts as the actual catalytic active species. These design principles were dedicated to facilitate the full release of Cβ· key intermediates to formed the crucial hydroperoxide intermediate with O2 (from air) and radical-coupled intermediate with tBuO· (from TBHP), thereby leading to excellent electrocatalytic activity for Cα−Cβ bonds cleavage. The results of electrocatalytic reaction showed a conversion rate of >93% for lignin model compound, 2-phenoxy-1-phenylethanol, with >85% total Cα−Cβ bond cleavage to produce benzaldehyde, methyl benzoate, and phenol. In addition, we also demonstrated that the electrocatalytic oxidation strategy with the as-designed catalyst realized the depolymerization of OL and industrial KL with aromatic monomer yields of 13 and 5 wt%, respectively.
The Mo@NiCoOOH heterojunction catalyst was synthesized by an electrochemically mediated in situ self-reconstruction approach based on a MoS2 sacrificial template (Fig. 1A). Initially, ultrathin MoS2 nanosheets with 1T phase were grown on carbon paper substrates via a hydrothermal reaction (Fig. S1), followed by the physical adsorption of Ni and Co ions from metal precursor solution. The doping ratio of Co could be precisely regulated through this process. NiCo hydroxide–MoS2 precatalyst was then obtained after drying (Fig. 1B). Eventually, the cyclic voltammetry activation process was implemented for in situ self-reconstruction by leaching most MoS2 template under oxidation condition to obtain the metal (oxy)hydroxide heterogeneous electrocatalysts that retained high-valence Mo.
The morphology of the as-designed electrocatalyst was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM). The SEM images of the MoS2 template with adsorbed metal precursor before and after activation (Fig. 1B to D) show that most of the MoS2 nanosheets were removed, and the Mo@NiCoOOH nanorods were created during the reconstruction process. To verify the formation of a heterojunction, HR-TEM was used to investigate the lattice spacing. As shown in Fig. 1E and F, lattice d-spacings of 0.209, 0.343, and 0.203 nm were quantified, which corresponded to the (105) and (006) planes of NiOOH and the (009) plane of MoS2, respectively. The (105) plane of metal (oxy)hydroxide was the dominant lattice plane in Mo@NiCoOOH (Fig. 1G). Furthermore, the diffraction rings of NiOOH were brighter after Co doping in the selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern (Fig. 1H), indicating better crystallinity. The energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) mappings (Fig. 1I) revealed a homogeneous distribution of Mo, Ni, and Co. Comparable physical features could also be observed for Mo@NiOOH (Figs. S2 to S4), validating similar physical properties after Co doping.
X-ray diffraction was conducted to confirm the crystal structures of the catalysts and MoS2 template. As seen in Fig. S5, the main diffraction peaks of the as-prepared catalysts located at 43.3° and 44.5°, corresponding to the (105) plane of NiOOH (PDF#06-0075) and (009) plane of MoS2 (PDF#17-0744), which was consistent with the TEM results. Other weak diffraction peaks belonging to the (0017) and (205) planes also appeared because of the low loading mass of Mo@NiCoOOH. No extra peaks of other species were observed, highlighting the dominant position of Ni-based catalysts, which was attributed to the leaching of MoS2 during electroactivation (Fig. S6). Moreover, to investigate the chemical states of Mo and Ni after Co doping, x-ray photoelectron spectrometry (XPS) was used. In Fig. 2A, the Mo 3d spectrum of Mo@NiCoOOH was split into Mo 3d3/2 and 3d5/2 peaks at 231.9 and 228.7 eV [39,40]. Following electrochemical activation, the heterojunction showed a considerably higher content of Mo6+ than the original MoS2 template. It has been demonstrated that the presence of Mo6+ species would facilitate the adsorption of TBHP during electrocatalytic depolymerization [41,42]. This phenomenon was also observed for the Mo@NiOOH catalyst without Co doping, implying that the electronic transfer of Mo in the heterojunction was unrelated to Co (Fig. S7). The Ni 2p spectra (Fig. 2B) showed 2 significant peaks at 873.7 and 856.2 eV, which corresponded to the characteristic binding energies of Ni 2p1/2 and 2p3/2. The deconvoluted peaks with binding energies at 874.9 and 856.8 eV agreed with Ni3+, whereas the peaks centered at 873.5 and 856.0 eV corresponded to Ni2+ [43,44]. Because of the doping of Co atoms, the electronic structure of Ni atoms may have changed, which greatly increased the ratio of Ni3+ to Ni2+. As demonstrated that the Ni3+ is the actual catalytic active site for lignin electrooxidation, the introduction of Co is vital for boosting the catalytic activity of NiOOH. In addition, the XPS spectrum of Co was deconvoluted into peaks of Co2+ and Co3+ (Fig. S8) [45]. The actual loading amounts of Ni, Co, and Mo were determined using inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry as 30.01, 6.29, and 0.70 μg/cm2 in the Mo@NiCoOOH electrode, respectively (Fig. S9).
X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) measurements were performed to further investigate the chemical states and coordination environments of Ni atoms in Mo@NiOOH and Mo@NiCoOOH. The oxidation states of Ni atoms in the samples at the K-edge in the x-ray absorption near-edge structure spectra are shown in Fig. 2C (with Ni foil and NiO as references). As can be seen in the partially enlarged details from 8,338 to 8,348 eV, the K-edge curves of both Mo@NiOOH and Mo@NiCoOOH were located at higher energies than NiO, revealing the formation of Ni3+ active species by our electrochemical mediated in situ activation strategy. The absorption edge of Ni in Mo@NiCoOOH showed a more pronounced right shift to Mo@NiOOH, implying significant electron loss of Ni after Co doping. This conclusion was also supported by the absorption peaks in the magnified area of ca. 8,344 to 8,357 eV, where the peak intensity was much stronger than that of Mo@NiOOH and NiO reference samples [46].
The coordination configurations were further examined by Fourier transform extended XAFS (EXAFS) spectra in the R-space (Fig. 2D). It was observed that the EXAFS spectrum of Mo@NiCoOOH presented a similar profile to that of Mo@NiOOH without Co doping, indicating that the local Ni coordination environment was similar in both samples. Thus, the increased oxidation state of Ni caused by Co doping was not due to a change in the coordination environment. Note that the distinctly shorter Ni−O scatterings (near 1.6 Å) of Mo@NiCoOOH and Mo@NiOOH compared with NiO (locate around 1.7 Å) caused stronger Ni−O bonds [47]. For the second and higher-shell structures (R > 2 Å), which represent Ni−Ni/Co/Mo interactions, the peaks located around 2.75 Å in the 2 prepared catalysts were observably different from that of NiO (2.57 Å) but well matched to NiOOH (2.82 Å) [48,49]. The synchrotron x-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) characterization analysis strongly supports our hypothesis of the successfully formed Mo@NiOOH heterostructure, while Co doping afforded Ni greater electron loss and richer Ni3+ active species. To gain further insight into the electron transfer in catalysts, the optimized theoretical models of Mo@NiOOH and Mo@NiCoOOH were established by theoretical calculations as shown in Fig. S10. Ni and Co, as transition metals, have strong electron correlation, which could provide a more available and broader charge rearrangement for Ni-based materials by Co doping. Thus, the distribution of active sites, conductivity, and catalytic performance would change accordingly. The charge redistribution can be imaged by 3D differential charge densities in Fig. 2E. A distinct excess of charge density (yellow) around O and Co atoms could be observed in the doping area of Mo@NiCoOOH compared to Mo@NiOOH. In addition, the adjacent Ni atoms showed a depletion of charge density (blue) after Co doping, while Mo atoms were barely affected, which is consistent with the XPS results. This phenomenon can be attributed to the interaction of introduced Co2+ and bridging O2− via π-donation, weakening the e−–e− repulsion between Ni2+ and bridging O2−, eventually promoting partial charge transfer from Ni2+ to Co2+ (Fig. S11) [50]. The charge rearrangement will provide Mo@NiCoOOH with well-matched adsorption/activation sites for activating or forming certain chemical bonds to achieve improved catalytic activities.
The most representative dimeric lignin model compound, 2-phenoxy-1-phenylethanol (1a), was selected as the substrate to investigate the Cα−Cβ bond cleavage regularity and establish the optimal reaction conditions under the catalysis by the Mo@NiCoOOH heterojunction. Electrocatalytic oxidation reactions were carried out in an undivided cell with a standard 3-electron system equipped with Mo@NiCoOOH as the working electrode, platinum (Pt) as the counter electrode, and Ag/AgCl as the reference electrode. As stated, the cleavage of Cα−Cβ bond relied primarily on the formation of Cβ· intermediate at catalytic active sites and bonding with O2 or tBuO· radicals to lower the bond dissociation energy. Thus, TBHP (55% aqueous solution) was used as the radical initiator and coupling partner in this work. As illustrated in Fig. 3A, the in situ formed tBuO· derived from the homolytic cleavage of TBHP was the main radical that participate in crucial radical intermediates formations with the Cβ· intermediate from 1a to realize the electrocatalytic oxidative cleavage of Cα−Cβ bonds. The catalytic activities and the bond cleavage selectivity were studied through qualitative and quantitative analyses by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and GC. Figure 3B shows that under constant electrocatalytic conditions, the main products of 1a were benzaldehyde (1b), methyl benzoate (1c), and phenol (1f) by the distinctly desired Cα−Cβ bonds cleavage, without other obvious unrelated monomer by-products produced and an almost complete conversion of 1a was achieved.
To reveal the role of Co doping, Mo@NiCoOOH with varying amounts of Co was synthesized and denoted as Mo@Ni10−xCoxOOH (x = 0, 1, 2, 3, 10). As seen in Fig. S12, the electrocatalytic depolymerization activities of Mo@Ni10−xCoxOOH samples displayed a strong dependence on the Co content. Mo@NiOOH (x = 0) showed a Cα−Cβ bond cleavage yield and 1a conversion rate of 76.54% and 92.96%, respectively, with selectivity for Cα−Cβ bond cleavage at 82.69%. When 10% Co was introduced to the heterojunction (Mo@Ni9Co1OOH, x = 1), we obtained a Cα−Cβ bond cleavage products yield of 85.36% including 1b and 1c for 57.29% and 28.07%, meanwhile a yield of 13% for phenol. The conversion rate of 1a reached 93.69%, and the selectivity of Cα−Cβ bond cleavage achieved 91.11% as the optimal result. However, further increasing the proportion of Co led to inferior yields and conversion rates. This owns to that more catalytic active sites (Ni atoms) were substituted with Co atoms, suppressing their interactions with reactants. To verify the synergistic catalysis of the heterojunction on the MoS2 substrate, pure Ni9Co1OOH and MoS2 were directly hydrothermally synthesized on carbon paper and subjected to the same electrooxidation reactions, but low conversion rates of 1a and poor product selectivity were obtained (Figs. S13 and S14). These comparisons highlight the important role of high-valence Mo and heterostructure in the electrocatalytic activity of the Mo@NiCoOOH catalyst, with the Mo@Ni9Co1OOH exhibiting the highest electrocatalytic activity among all samples. Thus, all other experiments were carried out on the basis of the Mo@Ni9Co1OOH, directly named as Mo@NiCoOOH unless otherwise state.
Time-gradient electrolysis experiments (from 0 to 6 h) were conducted to explore the optimal reaction times. As can be seen in Fig. 3C, when prolonging the electrolysis time, substrate 1a was gradually consumed, and the main products 1b and 1c were observed with satisfactory product specificity maintained under the standard conditions, suggesting a highly selective Cα−Cβ bond cleavage by Mo@NiCoOOH. Depolymerization was almost complete at 5 h, and the yields barely increased when the reaction time was extended to 6 h. To study the effect of potentials on the bond cleavage activity, electrocatalysis was further performed at different potentials using Mo@NiCoOOH (Fig. 3D). The GC quantification (Fig. S15) suggested that 3.5 V was the optimal potential for electrocatalytic oxidative cleavage with a current density of ~13 mA/cm2 (Fig. S16). Lower potential did not achieve sufficient catalytic efficiency, while higher potential had difficulty in maintaining product selectivity due to poorly matched electron transfer between the electrode and reaction intermediates. Another important criterion for an electrocatalyst is its operational stability. Therefore, cyclic electrolysis experiments were performed with reuse cycles. The yields and conversion rates did not decrease significantly (Fig. 3E) and always maintained over 85% of the original catalytic efficiency in the first 5 cycles, showing an excellent stability of the Mo@NiCoOOH heterojunction catalyst. The conversion capacity of catalyst had a relatively decline until the 10th cycle (Fig. S17), and this phenomenon may be put down to a densified surface reconfiguration of the catalyst after prolonged use (Fig. S18). Then, the electrocatalytic performance of the noble metal-free Mo@NiCoOOH heterojunction was compared with recently reported catalysts for electro-, photo-, and thermal approaches (Table S1). We also choose the 2-(2-methoxyphenoxy)-1-phenylethanol, which more closely resembles the native lignin structure as other substrate, to verified the universal Cα−Cβ bond cleavage ability in Fig. S19. As a result, the products 1b, 1c, and guaiacol were detected with yields of 32%, 15% and 9%, respectively. The competitive catalytic efficiency of the substrate dosage, short-time consumption, and convenient experimental conditions provide a facile strategy for the electrocatalytic depolymerization of lignin.
To gain a better understanding of the mechanism for electrocatalytic Cα−Cβ bond oxidative cleavage, serial control experiments were carried out along with density functional theory (DFT) calculations. First, the radical reaction pathway was studied by adding the radical scavenger, 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-piperidinyloxy (TEMPO) [51]. As seen in Fig. S20A, the GCs of reaction mixtures before and after electrocatalytic oxidative reaction with TEMPO showed no differences in terms of substrate consumption and product formation. This suggests that the cleavage of Cα−Cβ bonds was prevented by inhibiting the formation of key radical intermediates.
The proposed Cα−Cβ bond oxidative cleavage pathways for 1a over the Mo@NiCoOOH catalyst are shown in Fig. 4A. As reported in previous literature, TBHP could play important roles as radical initiator, terminal oxidant, and radical coupling partner in the reaction by decomposing into tBuO· and OH· [52]. We experimentally verified that the Cα−Cβ bond cleavage goes through 2 pathways at once by forming different key intermediates. For the route 1, O2 from air participated in the formation of 1a′OO· with 1a′ which extracted Cβ–H from 1a by tBuO· [53–58]. Next, the intermediate 1a′OO· bind with the H of tBuOH to form 1a′OOH and then decomposed into 1a′OH and [O]. Finally, benzaldehyde (1b) and 1e were formed through the Cα−Cβ bond cleavage under the promotion of electrocatalysis. Part of the 1b was further oxidized into benzoic acid (1d) and then esterized with methanol from electrolyte to produce methyl benzoate (1c). Meanwhile, 1e transformed into phenol (1f) by dehydration and CO2 removal. This route could afford part of products, and the remaining was produced through radical coupling in route 2 that Cβ–H was extracted by electrocatalytic oxidation in anode [59,60]. This was confirmed by experiments under the N2 atmosphere as shown in Fig. S20B, since the products could be detected without O2. In this pathway, Cβ· radical 1a′ was generated via Cβ−H transfer from 1a to the present OH* at Ni site (adjacent to Co) of Mo@NiCoOOH. Subsequently, the unstable radical intermediate tBuO· and 1a′ underwent radical/radical cross-coupling to form 1a′-OtBu. Finally, electron transfer in 1a′-OtBu led to the selective cleavage of Cα−Cβ bonds, producing 1b and 1g. In the reaction mixture, 1c was formed as route 1, and the unstable intermediate 1g spontaneously decomposed into 1f and CO2. The reason for the relatively low retention rate of phenol is attributed to the hydroxyl radicals from tBuOOH in the electrocatalytic reaction mixture, one of the strongest inorganic oxidants, oxidized part of the highly degradable compound 1f into free radicals. Further chain oxidation of the organic radicals led to a decomposition of 1f into CO2 and water facilitated by abundant electron transfer in electrocatalysis [61,62]. A control experiment, in which substrate 1a was replaced by phenol, was carried out to prove this conclusion. The GC result (Fig. S21) showed an obvious degradation of phenol after a long-term electrocatalytic oxidation process, which corroborated the radical reaction pathway.
DFT calculations were further performed in Fig. 4B to investigate the reaction energy profiles of these 2 routes by establishing optimized theoretical models. As reported by previous work from Duan’s group [28], Cβ–H of 1a was the decisively adsorbed site, and the tBuO· was more resultful to participate in the radical-mediated cleavage reaction than tBuOO·. We can find out that the rate-determining step (RDS) of route 1 was the formation of 1a′OOH intermediate by hydrogen transfer from tBuOH, with a Gibbs free-energy change (ΔG) of 1.32 eV, which is 0.55 eV higher than the RDS in route 2 (1a′ desorption, ΔG = 0.77 eV). Nevertheless, the overall Gibbs free energy is lower than that of route 2. This phenomenon confirmed that the formation of 1a′OOH hydroperoxide intermediate is much crucial for promoting the formation of products, which corresponds well with the experimental results. Under the promotion of electrocatalysis, the 2 pathways work together to bring out the excellent substrate conversion.
Moreover, to confirming the superiority of Co doping, we also explored the theoretical adsorption and reaction behaviors on Mo@NiOOH and Mo@NiCoOOH. Taking route 2 as example (Fig. S22), the calculated adsorption energies (Eads) of 1a on Mo@NiOOH and Mo@NiCoOOH were −1.03 and −1.50 eV, respectively. This demonstrated that Co doping provided Ni active site with a more accessible substrate adsorption ability. More importantly, the energy diagram (Fig. S23) shows that the RDS (1a′ desorption) of Mo@NiCoOOH with a ΔG of 0.77 eV was much lower than Mo@NiOOH (2.41 eV). All the results signify that Co doping effectively reduces the required energy for Cα−Cβ bond cleavage process and strongly improves the catalytic performance of Mo@NiCoOOH catalyst (Tables S2 and S3).
Inspired by the excellent electrocatalytic activity and Cα−Cβ bond cleavage selectivity, we explored the depolymerization of native lignin under electrocatalysis by Mo@NiCoOOH. OL extracted from poplar via acid treatment in dioxane was used as the substrate, and the electrocatalytic process was set to a slightly higher potential (4 V versus Ag/AgCl; Fig. S24) to cope with the more complex macromolecular structures compared with the dimeric model compound. 2D heteronuclear single quantum coherence nuclear magnetic resonance (2D HSQC NMR) spectra were obtained to detect the OL structure before and after electrocatalytic reactions of the main bonds (Fig. 5). In the side-chain region of OL (Fig. 5A), typical signals of β-O-4, β-5, and β-β linkages were observed [63,64]. After the electrocatalytic reaction under ambient conditions, signals belonging to the Cα−Cβ bonds (α and β sites of β-O-4, β'-O-4, β-5, β-β', and benzyl ether) disappeared (Fig. 5B), and the γ sites’ signals were also significantly weakened. This demonstrates that the Cα−Cβ bonds were destroyed as per our expectations. The decrease in the aromatic region of guaiacyl (G), syringyl (S), and p-hydroxybenzoate units after depolymerization was also observed, as shown in Fig. 5C and D, further confirming the production of lignin monomers [65].
We conducted qualitatively and quantitatively analysis on the collected products. The solvent in the mixture solution after the reaction was removed by rotary evaporation, and the residue was extracted with ethyl acetate. A soluble fraction was obtained, which accounted for 49.82 wt% of the original lignin, together with an insoluble fraction that accounted for 37.6 wt% (Fig. 6A). The reaction residue was analyzed by gel permeation chromatography (GPC), and the results revealed a significant decrease in molecular weight compared with the OL (Fig. 6B). GC-MS results of the soluble fraction revealed that OL was depolymerized into aromatic monomers, mainly including vanillin and syringaldehyde along with some dimers and trimers (Figs. S25 to S30). From the quantitative GC results, over 13 wt% of the OL was converted to oxidized aromatic compounds through electrocatalytic depolymerization by Mo@NiCoOOH (Fig. 6C). Aromatic acids and aldehydes derived from S, G, and p-hydroxybenzoate were the major depolymerization products (7.2, 4.9, and 1.2 wt%), which consisted of the functional groups in the lignin model compounds. The S:G product ratio (1.5:1) was not very different from the S:G monomer ratio in original lignin (Fig. 6D) [66].
To further expand the applications of the electrocatalyst on various lignin, industrial Kraft lignin was also studied as a reactant under the electrocatalysis of the as-prepared Mo@NiCoOOH. From the aromatic region results in the 2D HSQC NMR spectrum (Fig. S31), it can be determined that the used Kraft lignin originated from softwood and the corresponding aromatic monomer products (vanillin and vanillic acid) (Fig. S32) were obtained through continuous electrocatalysis. The yields of G-derived products, with high commercial value, reached more than 5.0 wt% of Kraft lignin, according to GC analysis (Fig. 6E). All these results confirm that the electrocatalytic system dominated by the Mo@NiCoOOH heterojunction played a significant role in the universal Cα−Cβ bond dissociation of various lignin samples.
In this study, we demonstrated that the Mo@NiCoOOH heterojunction can selectively catalyze the cleavage of Cα−Cβ bond in both lignin model compounds and native/industrial lignin under ambient conditions via electrocatalytic oxidation. Detailed mechanistic studies based on model compound experiments and DFT theoretical calculations indicated that Mo@NiCoOOH had an excellent catalytic performance for Cα−Cβ bond cleavage through the formation of both 1a′OOH and 1a′-OtBu as the key intermediates. Vanillin and other aromatic monomers were obtained in decent yields from native/industrial lignin under ambient conditions. This research verified the preparation of renewable aromatics via a mild electrocatalytic conversion route without using noble metals or harsh reaction conditions. It also marks a significant milestone in the utilization of lignin, as providing a promising avenue to produce valuable chemical feedstock and offering preliminary guidance for the development of lignin electrocatalytic depolymerization.
The MoS2/NiCo lactate dehydrogenase precatalysts were constructed by a chemical bath. MoS2 nanosheets were activated at −1.5 V for 10 min (versus Ag/AgCl) in 1 M KOH to improve the hydrophilia and then washed with deionized water thoroughly. The resulting samples were further immersed in a mixed solution of NiCl2·6H2O and Co(NO3)2·6H2O (30 mM) for 20 min for physically adsorbing Ni and Co ions on the surface to construct the precatalysts. The doping ratio of 2 metals can be precisely regulated in this process. Then, the precatalysts were washed with deionized water thoroughly to remove excess adsorbate and dried at ambient conditions. After that, the MoS2/NiCo lactate dehydrogenase precatalysts were subjected to 5 cycles of cyclic voltammetry activation [the potential range from 0 to 0.8 V (versus Ag/AgCl) with a scan rate of 5 mV/s] in 1 M KOH solution to obtain self-reconstruction Mo doping MoNiCo (oxy)hydroxide through Mo leaching. Finally, the catalyst was successfully prepared by activation using constant potential of 0.7 V (versus Ag/AgCl).
Electrochemical measurements were performed using a 3-electrode system in a CHI-660E electrochemical station. MeCN was used as the solvent with the addition of nBu4NOH (1.0 M MeOH solution) to constitute the organic electrolyte. Mo@Ni9Co1OOH was used as the working electrode with a Pt counter electrode and Ag/AgCl reference electrode installed in an undivided cell. Different potentials were investigated to establish the optimal reaction conditions. 1a (0.2 mmol), nBu4NOH (0.2 mmol), TBHP (1.0 mmol), and internal standard substance (n-nonane) were added into MeCN (10.0 ml) and stirred for 20 min, and the electrocatalytic depolymerization was carried out for 5 h under air. The mixture solution after electrocatalytic depolymerization was removed through a syringe with a 0.22-μm organic filter, followed by qualitative and quantitative analysis using GC-MS and GC.
The morphologies of samples were characterized by SEM (JEOL, JSM-7500F, Japan). HR-TEM images, SAED, and EDS maps were taken by a JEOL TEM, JEM-F200 (Japan) operating at 200 kV. Powder x-ray diffraction was conducted in the 2θ range of 10° to 90° with Cu-Kα radiation (Rigaku SmartLab SE, Japan). XPS was carried out on a Thermo Fisher Scientific K-Alpha instrument (USA) with Al-Kα x-rays (1,489.6 eV, 150 W, 50.0-eV pass energy) using the C 1s peak at 284.8 eV as the internal standard. The chemical composition was detected by inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry (Thermo Fisher Scientific iCAP PRO, USA). Raman spectra were measured on a confocal microscope (HORIBA Scientific LabRAM HR Evolution, Japan) equipped with a semiconductor laser (λ = 532 nm). The synchrotron-based hard XAFS measurements were performed with Si(111) crystal monochromators at the BL14W1 beamlines at Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility in China.
The product yields of lignin model cleavage and lignin depolymerization were analyzed by GC-MS (Agilent 7890A-5975C, HP-5MS column, USA), and quantitative analysis were performed using GC (Agilent 8860, HP-5 column, USA). The organosolv, Kraft lignin, and depolymerization product fractions were characterized by 1H–13C, HSQC NMR (Bruker Advance III HD 500 MHz, Switzerland). GPC of lignin and depolymerization product fractions was conducted using tetrahydrofuran as the mobile phase on a Waters 1525 & Agilent PL-GPC220 (USA).
  • National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars(31925028)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China(22102019)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province(YQ2021C005)
1.
Shen X, Zhang C, Han B, Wang F. Catalytic self-transfer hydrogenolysis of lignin with endogenous hydrogen: Road to the carbon-neutral future. Chem Soc Rev. 2022;51(5):1608–1628.
2.
Zhang L, Rao TU, Wang J, Ren D, Sirisommboonchai S, Choi C, Machida H, Huo Z, Norinaga K. A review of thermal catalytic and electrochemical hydrogenation approaches for converting biomass-derived compounds to high-value chemicals and fuels. Fuel Process Technol. 2022;226:Article 107097.
3.
Yang C, Maldonado S, Stephenson CRJ. Electrocatalytic lignin oxidation. ACS Catal. 2021;11(16):10104–10114.
4.
Luo H, Weeda EP, Alherech M, Anson CW, Karlen SD, Cui Y,Foster CE, Stahl SS. Oxidative catalytic fractionation of lignocellulosic biomass under non-alkaline conditions. J Am Chem Soc. 2021;143(37):15462–15470.
5.
Jiang G, Wang G, Zhu Y, Cheng W, Cao K, Xu G, Yu H. A scalable bacterial cellulose ionogel for multisensory electronic skin. Research. 2022;9814767.
6.
Li R, Zhou Y, Li W, Zhu J, Huang W. Structure engineering in biomass-derived carbon materials for electrochemical energy storage. Research. 2020;8685436.
7.
Luo N, Wang M, Li H, Zhang J, Liu H, Wang F. Photocatalytic oxidation–hydrogenolysis of lignin β-O-4 models via a dual light wavelength switching strategy. ACS Catal. 2016;6(11):7716–7721.
8.
Li Y, Yu Y, Lou Y, Zeng S, Sun Y, Liu Y, Yu H. Hydrogen-transfer reductive catalytic fractionation of lignocellulose: High monomeric yield with switchable selectivity. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2023;62(32):Article e202307116.
9.
Zhou S-J, Wang H-M, Xiong S-J, Sun J-M, Wang Y-Y, Yu S, Sun Z, Wen J-L, Yuan T-Q. Technical lignin valorization in biodegradable polyester-based plastics (BPPs). ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2021;9(36):12017–12042.
10.
Kumar A, Biswas B, Saini K, Kumar A, Kumar J, Krishna BB, Bhaskar T. Py-GC/MS study of prot lignin with cobalt impregnated titania, ceria and zirconia catalysts. Renew Energy. 2021;172:121–129.
11.
Garedew M, Lin F, Song B, DeWinter TM, Jackson JE, Saffron CM, Lam CH, Anastas PT. Greener routes to biomass waste valorization: Lignin transformation through electrocatalysis for renewable chemicals and fuels production. ChemSusChem. 2020;13(17):4214–4237.
12.
Ragauskas AJ, Beckham GT, Biddy MJ, Chandra R, Chen F, Davis MF, Davison BH, Dixon RA, Gilna P, Keller M, et al.Lignin valorization: Improving lignin processing in the biorefinery. Science. 2014;344(6185):1246843.
13.
Anderson EM, Stone ML, Katahira R, Reed M, Muchero W, Ramirez KJ, Beckham GT, Roman-Leshkov Y. Differences in S/G ratio in natural poplar variants do not predict catalytic depolymerization monomer yields. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):2033.
14.
Wu X, Luo N, Xie S, Zhang H, Zhang Q, Wang F, Wang Y. Photocatalytic transformations of lignocellulosic biomass into chemicals. Chem Soc Rev. 2020;49(17):6198–6223.
15.
Li C, Zhao X, Wang A, Huber GW, Zhang T. Catalytic transformation of lignin for the production of chemicals and fuels. Chem Rev. 2015;115(21):11559–11624.
16.
Jia Y, Wen Y, Han X, Qi J, Liu Z, Zhang S, Li G. Electrocatalytic degradation of rice straw lignin in alkaline solution through oxidation on a Ti/SnO2–Sb2O3/α-PbO2/β-PbO2 anode and reduction on an iron or tin doped titanium cathode. Cat Sci Technol. 2018;8(18):4665–4677.
17.
Ko M, Pham LTM, Sa YJ, Woo J, Nguyen TVT, Kim JH, Oh D, Sharma P, Ryu J, Shin TJ, et al.Unassisted solar lignin valorisation using a compartmented photo-electro-biochemical cell. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):5123.
18.
Zhou H, Ren Y, Li Z, Xu M, Wang Y, Ge R, Kong X, Zheng L, Duan H. Electrocatalytic upcycling of polyethylene terephthalate to commodity chemicals and H2 fuel. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):4679.
19.
Huang J-B, Wu S-B, Cheng H, Lei M, Liang J-J, Tong H. Theoretical study of bond dissociation energies for lignin model compounds. J Fuel Chem Technol. 2015;43(4):429–436.
20.
Subbotina E, Rukkijakan T, Marquez-Medina MD, Yu X, Johnsson M, Samec JSM. Oxidative cleavage of C-C bonds in lignin. Nat Chem. 2021;13(11):1118–1125.
21.
Wang M, Lu J, Zhang X, Li L, Li H, Luo N, Wang F. Two-step catalytic C–C bond oxidative cleavage process converts lignin models and extracts to aromatic acids. ACS Catal. 2016;6(9):6086–6090.
22.
Yang X, Xu S, Li Y. Enhancing photocatalytic cleavage of C-C bonds in lignin model substrates by ternary nanocomposite of g-C3N4/rGO/CdS using rGO as electronic mediators. Sep Purif Technol. 2023;124411.
23.
Qi Y, Liu B, Qiu X, Zeng X, Luo Z, Wu W, Liu Y, Chen L, Zu X, Dong H, et al.Simultaneous oxidative cleavage of lignin and reduction of furfural via efficient electrocatalysis by P-doped CoMoO4. Adv Mater. 2023;35(14):2208284.
24.
Han G, Yan T, Zhang W, Zhang YC, Lee DY, Cao Z, Sun Y. Highly selective photocatalytic valorization of lignin model compounds using ultrathin metal/CdS. ACS Catal. 2019;9(12):11341–11349.
25.
Zhang C, Wang F. Sell a dummy: Adjacent functional group modification strategy for the catalytic cleavage of lignin β–O–4 linkage. Chin J Catal. 2017;38(7):1102–1107.
26.
Sedai B, Díaz-Urrutia C, Baker RT, Wu R, Silks LAP, Hanson SK. Aerobic oxidation of β-1 lignin model compounds with copper and oxovanadium catalysts. ACS Catal. 2013;3(12):3111–3122.
27.
Wang X, Chu S, Shao J, Liu C, Luo Z, Xiao R, Zhang H. Efficient and selective C–C bond cleavage of a lignin model using a polyimide photocatalyst with high photooxidation capability. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2022;10(35):11555–11566.
28.
Cui T, Ma L, Wang S, Ye C, Liang X, Zhang Z, Meng G, Zheng L, Hu H-S, Zhang J, et al.Atomically dispersed Pt-N3C1 sites enabling efficient and selective electrocatalytic C-C bond cleavage in lignin models under ambient conditions. J Am Chem Soc. 2021;143(25):9429–9439.
29.
Ma L, Zhou H, Kong X, Li Z, Duan H. An electrocatalytic strategy for C–C bond cleavage in lignin model compounds and lignin under ambient conditions. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2021;9(4):1932–1940.
30.
Zhou H, Li Z, Xu SM, Lu L, Xu M, Ji K, Ge R, Yan Y, Ma L, Kong X, et al.Selectively upgrading lignin derivatives to carboxylates through electrochemical oxidative C(OH)-C bond cleavage by a Mn-doped cobalt oxyhydroxide catalyst. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2021;60(16):8976–8982.
31.
Su L, Yang Z, Wang X, Zou Z, Wang B, Hodes G, Chang N, Suo Y, Ma Z, Wang H, et al.Flexible diodes/transistors based on tunable p-n-type semiconductivity in graphene/Mn-co-Ni-O nanocomposites. Research. 2021;9802795.
32.
Auer A, Andersen M, Wernig E-M, Hörmann NG, Buller N, Reuter K, Kunze-Liebhäuser J. Self-activation of copper electrodes during CO electro-oxidation in alkaline electrolyte. Nat Catal. 2020;3(10):797–803.
33.
Smith CZ, Utley JHP, Hammond JK. Electro-organic reactions. Part 601.. The electro-oxidative conversion at laboratory scale of a lignosulfonate into vanillin in an FM01 filter press flow reactor: Preparative and mechanistic aspects. J Appl Electrochem. 2010;41(4):363–375.
34.
Zirbes M, Schmitt D, Beiser N, Pitton D, Hoffmann T, Waldvogel SR. Anodic degradation of lignin at active transition metal-based alloys and performance-enhanced anodes. ChemElectroChem. 2019;6(1):155–161.
35.
Sun Y, Wang J, Qi Y, Li W, Wang C. Efficient electrooxidation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural using co-doped Ni3S2 catalyst: Promising for H2 production under industrial-level current density. Adv Sci. 2022;9(17):e2200957.
36.
Li Y, Tan X, Hocking RK, Bo X, Ren H, Johannessen B, Smith SC, Zhao C. Implanting Ni-O-VOx sites into Cu-doped Ni for low-overpotential alkaline hydrogen evolution. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):2720.
37.
Roh H, Jung H, Choi H, Han JW, Park T, Kim S, Yong K. Various metal (Fe Mo V Co)-doped Ni2P nanowire arrays as overall water splitting electrocatalysts and their applications in unassisted solar hydrogen production with STH 14 %. Appl Catal B. 2021;297:Article 120434.
38.
Meng J, Tong Z, Sun H, Liu Y, Zeng S, Xu J, Xia Q, Pan Q, Dou S, Yu H. Metal-free boron/phosphorus co-doped nanoporous carbon for highly efficient benzyl alcohol oxidation. Adv Sci. 2022;9(17):e2200518.
39.
Murugappan K, Anderson EM, Teschner D, Jones TE, Skorupska K, Román-Leshkov Y. Operando NAP-XPS unveils differences in MoO3 and Mo2C during hydrodeoxygenation. Nat Catal. 2018;1(12):960–967.
40.
Zhou Y, Luo M, Zhang W, Zhang Z, Meng X, Shen X, Liu H, Zhou M, Zeng X. Topological formation of a Mo-Ni-based hollow structure as a highly efficient electrocatalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction in alkaline solutions. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(24):21998–22004.
41.
Zhang Y, Chen Z, Zhang Y, Zhang Y. Epoxidation of unsaturated rubbers with alkyl hydroperoxide using molybdenum compounds as catalyst in the reactive processing equipment. Macromol Mater Eng. 2001;286(8):443–448.
42.
González-García O, Cedeño-Caero L. V-Mo based catalysts for oxidative desulfurization of diesel fuel. Catal Today. 2009;148(1-2):42–48.
43.
Zhang J, Li S, Hu R, Yuan B. An effective Ni(OH)2 optimization strategy via Cu2+ and Ni3+ co-doping for high capacity and long life-span lithium ion batteries. Ionics. 2021;27(5):2053–2066.
44.
Jin Y, Huang S, Yue X, Du H, Shen PK. Mo- and Fe-modified Ni(OH)2/NiOOH nanosheets as highly active and stable electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction. ACS Catal. 2018;8(3):2359–2363.
45.
Zhang Q, Gao S, Guo Y, Wang H, Wei J, Su X, Zhang H, Liu Z, Wang J. Designing covalent organic frameworks with co-O4 atomic sites for efficient CO2 photoreduction. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):1147.
46.
Park S, Khan Z, Shin TJ, Kim Y, Ko H. Rechargeable Na/Ni batteries based on the Ni(OH)2/NiOOH redox couple with high energy density and good cycling performance. J Mater Chem A. 2019;7(4):1564–1573.
47.
Gorlin M, Halldin Stenlid J, Koroidov S, Wang HY, Borner M, Shipilin M, Kalinko A, Murzin V, Safonova OV, Nachtegaal M, et al.Key activity descriptors of nickel-iron oxygen evolution electrocatalysts in the presence of alkali metal cations. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):6181.
48.
Wang Q, Huang X, Zhao ZL, Wang M, Xiang B, Li J, Feng Z, Xu H, Gu M. Ultrahigh-loading of Ir single atoms on NiO matrix to dramatically enhance oxygen evolution reaction. J Am Chem Soc. 2020;142(16):7425–7433.
49.
Bediako DK, Lassalle-Kaiser B, Surendranath Y, Yano J, Yachandra VK, Nocera DG. Structure-activity correlations in a nickel-borate oxygen evolution catalyst. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134(15):6801–6809.
50.
Zhao S, Wang Y, Dong J, He C-T, Yin H, An P, Zhao K, Zhang X, Gao C, Zhang L, et al.Ultrathin metal–organic framework nanosheets for electrocatalytic oxygen evolution. Nat Energy. 2016;1(12):16184.
51.
Liu H, Li H, Lu J, Zeng S, Wang M, Luo N, Xu S, Wang F. Photocatalytic cleavage of C–C bond in lignin models under visible light on mesoporous graphitic carbon nitride through π–π stacking interaction. ACS Catal. 2018;8(6):4761–4771.
52.
Liu YL, Ouyang YJ, Zheng H, Liu H, Wei WT. Recent advances in acyl radical enabled reactions between aldehydes and alkenes. Chem Commun. 2021;57(50):6111–6120.
53.
Sharma S, Sinha S, Chand S. Polymer anchored catalysts for oxidation of styrene using TBHP and molecular oxygen. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2012;51(26):8806–8814.
54.
Zhang TS, Zhang H, Fu R, Wang J, Hao WJ, Tu SJ, Jiang B. Tert-butyl peroxide (TBHP)/KI-mediated dual C(sp2)-H bond amination of arylamines with alpha-diazo carbonyls toward 124-benzotriazines. Chem Commun. 2019;55(88):13231–13234.
55.
Wu Z, Li Y, Zhang C, Huang X, Peng B, Wang G. Recent advances in metal-organic-framework-based catalysts for thermocatalytic selective oxidation of organic substances. Chem Catal. 2022;2(5):1009–1045.
56.
Büker J, Muhler M, Peng B. Concepts of heterogeneously catalyzed liquid-phase oxidation of cyclohexene with tert-butyl hydroperoxide hydrogen peroxide and molecular oxygen. ChemCatChem. 2022;15(1):Article e202201216.
57.
Huang R, Cao C, Liu J, Sun D, Song W. N-doped carbon nanofibers derived from bacterial cellulose as an excellent metal-free catalyst for selective oxidation of arylalkanes. Chem Commun. 2019;55(13):1935–1938.
58.
Bai J, Huang J, Jiang Q, Li Y, Wang H, Yu H, Zhang Q, Cao Y, Peng F. Radical propagation facilitating aerobic oxidation of substituted aromatics promoted by tert-butyl hydroperoxide. ChemistrySelect. 2021;6(27):6895–6903.
59.
Dong Z, Pan H, Yang L, Fan L, Xiao Y, Chen J, Wang W. Porous organic polymer immobilized copper nanoparticles as heterogeneous catalyst for efficient benzylic C–H bond oxidation. J Saudi Chem Soc. 2022;26(1):Article 101397.
60.
Wu C-S, Liu R-X, Ma D-Y, Luo C-P, Yang L. Four-component radical dual difunctionalization (RDD) of two different alkenes with aldehydes and tert-butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP): An easy access to β,δ-functionalized ketones. Org Lett. 2019;21(15):6117–6121.
61.
Pulgarin C, Adler N, Peringer P, Comninellis C. Electrochemical detoxification of a 1,4-benzoquinone solution in wastewater treatment. Water Res. 1994;28(4):887–893.
62.
Luo H, Li C, Wu C, Zheng W, Dong X. Electrochemical degradation of phenol by in situ electro-generated and electro-activated hydrogen peroxide using an improved gas diffusion cathode. Electrochim Acta. 2015;186:486–493.
63.
Liu Y, Deak N, Wang Z, Yu H, Hameleers L, Jurak E, Deuss PJ, Barta K. Tunable and functional deep eutectic solvents for lignocellulose valorization. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):5424.
64.
Lou Y, Sun X, Yu Y, Zeng S, Li Y, Liu Y, Yu H. One-pot protolignin extraction by targeted unlocking lignin–carbohydrate esters via nucleophilic addition–elimination strategy. Research. 2023;6:0069.
65.
Yan K, Zhang Y, Tu M, Sun Y. Electrocatalytic valorization of organosolv lignin utilizing a nickel-based electrocatalyst. Energy Fuel. 2020;34(10):12703–12709.
66.
Rahimi A, Ulbrich A, Coon JJ, Stahl SS, Coon JJ, Stahl SS. Formic-acid-induced depolymerization of oxidized lignin to aromatics. Nature. 2014;515(7526):249–252.
Year 2023 volume 6 Issue 12
PDF
64
36
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.34133/research.0288
  • Receive Date:2023-11-08
  • Online Date:2026-10-28
  • Published:2023-12-20
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2023-11-08
  • Accepted:2023-11-24
Funding
National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars(31925028)
National Natural Science Foundation of China(22102019)
Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province(YQ2021C005)
Affiliations
    1Key Laboratory of Bio-based Material Science and Technology of Ministry of Education, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China.
    2State Key Laboratory of Chem/Bio-Sensing and Chemometrics, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China.
    3School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou 213001, China.

Corresponding:

* Address correspondence to: (H.Y.)
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/research/EN/10.34133/research.0288
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT