收藏切换
Interfacial Oxygen Octahedral Coupling-Driven Robust Ferroelectricity in Epitaxial Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3 Thin Films
收藏切换
PDF
Haojie Han1, Qinghua Zhang2, Wei Li1, Yiqun Liu1, Jiasheng Guo1, Yue Wang1, Qian Li1, Lin Gu1, Ce-Wen Nan1, Jing Ma1, *
Research. Vol 6 Article ID 0191
Less
收藏切换
Research. Vol 6 Article ID 0191
• Research Article •
Interfacial Oxygen Octahedral Coupling-Driven Robust Ferroelectricity in Epitaxial Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3 Thin Films
Full
Haojie Han1, Qinghua Zhang2, Wei Li1, Yiqun Liu1, Jiasheng Guo1, Yue Wang1, Qian Li1, Lin Gu1, Ce-Wen Nan1, Jing Ma1, *
Affiliations
  • 1State Key Laboratory of New Ceramics and Fine Processing, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
  • 2Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Published: 2023-07-20 doi: 10.34133/research.0191
Outline
收藏切换

The oxygen octahedral rotation (OOR) forms fundamental atomic distortions and symmetries in perovskite oxides and definitely determines their properties and functionalities. Therefore, epitaxial strain and interfacial structural coupling engineering have been developed to modulate the OOR patterns and explore novel properties, but it is difficult to distinguish the 2 mechanisms. Here, different symmetries are induced in Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3 (NBT) epitaxial films by interfacial oxygen octahedral coupling rather than epitaxial strain. The NBT film grown on the Nb:SrTiO3 substrate exhibits a paraelectric tetragonal phase, while with La0.5Sr0.5MnO3 as a buffer layer, a monoclinic phase and robust ferroelectricity are obtained, with a remanent polarization of 42 μC cm−2 and a breakdown strength of 7.89 MV cm−1, which are the highest record among NBT-based films. Moreover, the interfacial oxygen octahedral coupling effect is demonstrated to propagate to the entire thickness of the film, suggesting an intriguing long-range effect. This work provides a deep insight into understanding the structure modulation in perovskite heterostructures and an important avenue for achieving unique functionalities.

Haojie Han, Qinghua Zhang, Wei Li, Yiqun Liu, Jiasheng Guo, Yue Wang, Qian Li, Lin Gu, Ce-Wen Nan, Jing Ma. Interfacial Oxygen Octahedral Coupling-Driven Robust Ferroelectricity in Epitaxial Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3 Thin Films[J]. Research, 2023 , 6 (7) : 0191 - . DOI: 10.34133/research.0191
ABO3-type perovskite oxides, consisting of the corner-sharing oxygen octahedra, offer a broad range of emergent functionalities, such as superconductivity, metal–insulator transition, ferroelectricity, and ferromagnetism, which are closely coupled to crystal symmetry [1–5]. Developing strategies to manipulate the symmetry correlated with the BO6 oxygen octahedral rotation (OOR) patterns has attracted extensive attention for exploring novel properties and functionalities. Apart from the widely established strain engineering for oxide symmetry modification via lattice mismatch, interfacial oxygen octahedral coupling engineering, which forces the octahedra in the film to deform or rotate (tilt) to maintain corner connectivity of oxygen octahedra at interface, has served as a degree of freedom for tuning the crystal structure and modulating physical properties such as magnetism and polarization [6–9]. However, interfacial oxygen octahedral coupling engineering remains challenging, in that a typically limited propagation thickness of less than 10 nm restricts the development of intriguing functional properties in perovskite heterostructures. In addition, the impacts of strain and interfacial oxygen octahedral coupling on film symmetry are usually coupled, resulting in challenges to distinguish them.
Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3 (NBT) has long been an intriguing topic among lead-free ferroelectric materials due to its macroscopic ferroelectricity and unique phase-structure flexibility, thus triggering the promising application in non-volatile memory, electromechanical device, and energy storage [10–12]. NBT is an A-site disordered perovskite material with a complex phase transition process, changing from a high-temperature cubic (Pm3¯m) phase to a paraelectric tetragonal (P4bm) phase at 540 °C, then gradually to a ferroelectric phase during 200 to 320 °C [13–15]. It has been commonly accepted that NBT exhibits the rhombohedral (R3c) phase at room temperature, while recent studies demonstrated the existence of monoclinic (Cc) phase [16–18]. Though extensive studies about the structure delineation of NBT have been reported [16–22], the complex phase structures remain open questions, mainly due to the grain boundary, grain size, and some other unwanted factors in ceramics [23–25]. Such perplexing phases play a vital role in regulating ferroelectricity, electrostriction, and other properties in NBT-based materials, and further complicate the analyses of the underlying property–structure mechanisms. In order to meet the requirement of miniaturized devices and explicitly elucidate the underlying fundamental physical mechanisms, several researchers have shed light on the development of NBT films [26–29]. However, the properties of NBT films exhibit large variations and deviations from the ferroelectric performance measured in bulk, which make them unsuitable platforms for investigating the evolution of phase structures and functionalities. Therefore, it is essential to fabricate high-quality NBT epitaxial films with superior ferroelectricity to further explore the sophisticated correlation between structure and properties.
In this work, interfacial oxygen octahedral coupling was utilized to engineer the structure symmetry and the closely related ferroelectric properties in NBT films. To minimize the strain effect, NBT films were epitaxially grown on La0.5Sr0.5MnO3/SrTiO3(001) (LSMO/STO) and Nb:SrTiO3(001) (NSTO) substrates, respectively. A combination of x-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM), and optical second harmonic generation (SHG) techniques was employed to reveal the structural variation of NBT films. With LSMO as a buffer layer, the monoclinic-phase (M-phase) structure with the highest remanent polarization of 42 μC cm−2 among NBT-based films is stabilized in the NBT film grown on LSMO/STO substrate, while the NBT film directly grown on NSTO substrate is tetragonal-phase (T-phase) and paraelectricity. This study unequivocally reveals the specific phase modulation mechanism by interfacial oxygen octahedral coupling in NBT epitaxial film. Such strategy can be further extended to a broader class of perovskites, providing a universal guidance for designing ferroelectric devices with remarkable performances and novel functionalities.
To demonstrate the feasibility of interfacial oxygen octahedral coupling-modulated symmetry in NBT epitaxial films, cubic single-crystal NSTO and STO (with the same lattice constant a = 0.3905 nm), which possess little lattice mismatch with bulk NBT (apc = bpc = 0.3887 nm for M-phase, apc = 0.3885 nm for R-phase, and aT = 0.3880 nm for T-phase; pc corresponds to pseudocubic), were chosen as substrates to minimize the effect of interfacial strain. For the film grown on STO, a 12-nm-thick LSMO layer (R3c space group in the bulk [30], apc = 0.3847 nm) was deposited firstly as the bottom electrode and buffer layer. The thickness of NBT films deposited on (001)-oriented LSMO/STO (denoted as NBT-L) and conductive NSTO (denoted as NBT-N) substrates is approximately 25 nm, as confirmed by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM, Fig. S1). It has been demonstrated that the impact of the octahedral coupling decays rapidly away from the LSMO/STO interface [6]; thus, the intrinsic oxygen octahedra structures in the 12-nm-thick LSMO rather than STO substrate should primarily affect the growth of the above NBT films.
θ–2θ XRD studies (Fig. S2) reveal that both NBT-L and NBT-N are epitaxial and single phase without any impurities. However, the (002) peaks display differences, i.e., single peak at 46.85° for the NBT-N film while 2 split peaks at 46.80° and 47.07° for the NBT-L film, as shown in Fig. 1A. The splitting in the (002) peak suggests the characteristic of the monoclinic structure rather than the rhombohedral structure of NBT-L, in accordance with NBT ceramics [16]. The full width at half maximum of the ω-scans (rocking curves) (Fig. S3) for NBT-N and NBT-L are 0.061° and 0.045°, respectively, indicating the excellent crystalline quality of both films. The epitaxial growth of NBT films was confirmed by phi scans of (202) planes (Fig. 1B and C) with 4-fold symmetry of films inherited from substrates. Subsequent reciprocal space mappings taken around the (103) plane of the films and substrates (Fig. 1D and E) certify that the in-plane lattice parameters of the substrates and films are identical in both NBT-N/NSTO and NBT-L/LSMO/STO systems (a = b = 0.3905 nm), but the out-of-plane lattice parameters c of the 2 films display slight difference, consistent with the results of θ–2θ patterns (0.3875 nm and 0.3879 nm for NBT-N and NBT-L, respectively). Comprehensively, considering the splitting of the (002) peaks and in-plane rotational symmetry, the tetragonal and monoclinic structures can be confirmed in NBT-N and NBT-L, respectively.
Figure 2A and B show the cross-sectional annular bright-field (ABF) STEM images of NBT films. To effectively reveal the phase structure and OOR patterns of the epitaxial films, STEM observation was performed along the 11¯0pc zone axis. The oxygen atomic columns of the NBT-L film are clearly visible in Fig. 2A, which demonstrate the obvious oxygen octahedra tilt feature. Thus, the tilting of BO6 octahedra induces a relative shift (δO1-O2) between the nearest 2 adjacent oxygen atoms along the [110] direction, denoted as O1 and O2. Considering that the rotation of BO6 octahedra about the c axis cannot be observed in this direction, the OOR pattern of NBT-L can be identified as a−a−c0 (defined by Glazer notation [31]), which is consistent with the OOR pattern of La2/3Sr1/3MnO3 observed along the 11¯0pc direction [32]. In contrast, the BO6 octahedra in the NBT-N film do not exhibit obvious tilt (as shown in Fig. 2B). Combined with the above XRD and STEM analysis, the OOR pattern of NBT-N should follow an a0a0c0, corresponding to the tetragonal symmetry. The precise layer position-dependent δO1-O2 in both NBT films is summarized in Fig. 2C, directly reflecting the difference in the OOR. Notably, different OOR patterns can both be stabilized over a long range of 2 samples. To confirm the phase structures of NBT-L and NBT-N, selected-area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns were taken from the selected regions marked by the dashed squares in Fig. S1. Different from the NBT-N film with only regular fundamental reflections (e.g., {001} and {110}) of the pseudocubic structure (Fig. 2E), additional half-integer reflections (marked by the orange circles) 12ooo (“o” refers to odd hkl indexes, e.g., 12111 and 12113) appear in both NBT-L (Fig. 2D) and LSMO films (Fig. S4A and B), which indicates the a−a−c− OOR pattern corresponding to the typical characteristics of monoclinic symmetry [16,17]. However, considering the absence of half-integer reflections (Fig. 2E and Fig. S4D), the OOR pattern of NBT-N can be further confirmed as a0a0c0, with a space group of P4mm. Therefore, it demonstrates that with the insertion of LSMO as a buffer layer, different OOR patterns were induced, leading to the stabilization of M-phase and T-phase in NBT-L and NBT-N epitaxial films, respectively.
The formation mechanism of the different phases in NBT films can be understood as follows. Although the bulk NBT is M-phase (Cc)/R-phase (R3c) at room temperature, which possesses a−a−c−/a−a−a− rotation with a small angle [16,25], the cubic STO and NSTO exhibit a0a0a0 pattern without octahedral rotation. In the heterosymmetric interface, interfacial oxygen octahedral coupling effects offer the interfacially engineered oxygen environment, which leads to the change of B–O–B bond angle and the deformation of oxygen octahedral to achieve minimal oxygen octahedral mismatch between epitaxial film and substrate [33]. As shown in Fig. 2F, for the NBT film directly epitaxially grown on NSTO substrate, the interfacial oxygen positions are strongly restricted by the connection of octahedra at the interface, resulting in the stabilization of the T-phase structure with the Ti–O–Ti bond angle of ~180° and the OOR of a0a0c0 in NBT-N. However, with LSMO as a buffer layer, the a0a0a0 rotation of STO can only affect the OOR of LSMO close to the LSMO/STO interface within about 8 u.c. [6]. Thus, in the case of the 12-nm-thick LSMO, the NBT will only be subjected to the OOR pattern of LSMO (a−a−c−) at the NBT/LSMO interface, further facilitating the formation of M-phase NBT with a−a−c− rotation. Thus, through the interfacial oxygen octahedral coupling engineering, the structure symmetry of the epitaxial NBT films can be explicitly controlled. Furthermore, according to the single-phase structure in NBT-L and NBT-N confirmed by XRD and SAED, the interfacial oxygen octahedral coupling effect can stabilize the M- and T-phase NBT film throughout the entire thickness of 25 nm, which is probable due to the small energy differences among different phases of NBT [34,35]. Therefore, considering that the symmetry constraints are enforced to every subsequent layer, for the films with the smaller energy differences between the metastable phase and equilibrium phase, the initiated novel symmetry is likely to sustain in a longer thickness range.
In order to trace the phase transition and further verify the phase structure of the NBT films, in situ XRD measurements were performed during heating and the c-axis parameters and the thermal expansion coefficients were further calculated based on the in situ XRD results. Figure 3A and B display the corresponding θ–2θ patterns around the (002) reflection peaks from 25 to 500 °C. As the annealing proceeds, the (002) peaks of the substrate and the film shift toward lower angles due to thermal expansion, which is reflected in the increased c-axis parameters with the thermal expansion coefficient of about 3 to 4 ppm K−1. However, the initial (002) peak of NBT-L gradually fades away above 300 °C, while a new peak emerges at a higher angle position and the thermal expansion coefficient changes to 15 ppm K−1, which demonstrates the end of phase transition and a new phase appeared in NBT-L. According to the previous report [13] and the above structural analyses, this phase transition can be attributed to the M–T transition of NBT. As the temperature increased above 450 °C, the peaks of NBT-L and LSMO merge into one peak with the c-axis parameters of about 0.3878 nm. This should be ascribed to the gradual oxygen loss in LSMO [36], which leads to the structural disruption of NBT-L, as evidenced in Fig. S5. In contrast, the peak position of the NBT-N film continues to shift toward lower angles until 500 °C, but the thermal expansion coefficient changes from 3.4 ppm K−1 to 4.9 ppm K−1 around 300 °C (Fig. 3B), which indicates that the NBT-L film exhibits a different phase transition process from NBT-N film during heating.
Optical SHG is a sensitive probe to acquire abundant information about local crystal symmetry, domain distribution, phase transition process, etc. [37–40]. As schematically shown in Fig. 3C, the rotational anisotropy of the optical SHG intensity is examined with a normal-incidence configuration, in which the SHG signal is collected in a reflecting geometry and the incident light can be focused to a spot of ~1 μm for polar-domain imaging, i.e., scanning SHG microscopy [40]. In this configuration, the incident polarized light beam provides only the electrical field components in the x–y plane (defined in Fig. 3C) and only the polarization in the x–y plane (in-plane) can be collected through the polarizer. Thus, it effectively probes the crystal symmetry of polar materials with spontaneous polarization (Ps) variants in the x–y plane. The in-plane anisotropic SHG patterns of NBT-L and NBT-N (Fig. S6) show different preferred orientations of domains, which imply different crystal structures. In addition, horizontal and vertical mode measurements, corresponding to the cases with the analyzer parallel and perpendicular to the polarization direction of the incident beam, respectively, were performed to determine Px and Py to further illustrate the symmetry of the films. For NBT-N, one double lobe in horizontal mode and 2 double lobes in vertical mode are observed in Fig. 3D, which indicates the presence of tetragonal phase [41]. In contrast, for NBT-L, both horizontal and vertical modes have 2 double lobes (Fig. 3E), consistent with the feature of a monoclinic phase [8]. The fitting of SHG data further verify the M- and T-phase symmetry of NBT-L and NBT-N, respectively (details in the Supplementary Materials). In addition, the observed patterns cannot be numerically reproduced when a single domain model is considered, and the agreement between the SHG signal (data points) and the simulation (line) is only achieved when considering multi-domain models in both cases.
Figure 3F displays the temperature-dependent SHG signals of NBT-L and NBT-N films. The decrease of SHG intensity demonstrates that the proportion of polar domains decreases with increasing temperature for both samples [42]. The small hump at 100 to 150 °C is ascribed to the increased domain walls induced by thermally enhanced local disorder in the multi-domain structure [43]. The SHG intensity of NBT-L displays 2 humps as temperature increases to 190 and 320 °C, yet not presented in NBT-N. These features are sensitive indicators of the M–T phase transition in the temperature range [21], consistent with the in situ XRD results (Fig. 3A and B). In addition, the SHG intensity of NBT-N and NBT-L drops to minimum values above 260 and 400 °C, respectively, indicating a tetragonal–cubic phase transition. Therefore, the SHG results further evidence the monoclinic symmetry for NBT-L and tetragonal symmetry for NBT-N.
Due to the different structure symmetries, the ferroelectric properties of NBT-L and NBT-N films, which are closely related to the structure, must also be different. Piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM) images of 2 samples are present in Fig. S7. The labyrinthine domains and local phase hysteresis loops in the NBT-L film demonstrate the typical characteristic of ferroelectric phase NBT [44]. On the contrary, the paraelectric nature is observed in the NBT-N film. Figure 4A and C display the polarization versus electrical field (P–E) loops of both films, further demonstrating the different ferroelectricity in 2 samples. Remarkably, with almost the same film thickness of ~25 nm, NBT-L exhibits a typical ferroelectric hysteresis while the paraelectric characteristic can be observed in NBT-N. By applying an electric field of 4 MV cm−1, the remanent polarization (Pr) of NBT-L reaches approximately 42 μC cm−2, approaching the bulk value of M-phase NBT [22]. Two obvious ferroelectric switching current peaks appear in current versus voltage (I–V) curves of NBT-L (Fig. 4D), while only the linear polarization current and leakage current contribution are displayed in NBT-N (Fig. 4B). The coercive field (Ec) of NBT-L is estimated to be around 1.4 MV cm−1, much larger than that of the bulk NBT (about 50 to 80 kV cm−1), which could be ascribed to the thickness effect [45,46]. Additionally, the leakage current densities of both samples, shown in Fig. 4E, are at low levels, which excludes the possible artifacts of ferroelectricity caused by the leakage current. It is also worth mentioning that, although plenty of NBT-based films have been investigated (detailed data in Table S1), the NBT-L film in this work exhibits the highest Pr of 42 μC cm−2, which approached the theoretical value in NBT ceramics [22], and high electrical breakdown strength (Eb) of 7.89 MV cm−1 (Fig. 4F). Such high Pr and large Eb give credit to the high crystal quality and well epitaxial orientation of the pure M-phase structure in NBT-L, which importantly extends the performance boundary of NBT-based thin films. Meanwhile, considering the <001> epitaxial orientation of NBT-L, the present polarization is higher than the theoretical value for R-phase NBT of ~23 μC cm−2 in this direction [14], which further confirmed the existence of the M-phase (Cc) structure. All results above demonstrate the remarkable ferroelectric properties in NBT-L films, ensuring their tremendous potential in high-performance miniaturized ferroelectric devices. Moreover, the correlation between ferroelectricity and phase structure is unequivocally revealed in epitaxial NBT films, demonstrating the critical role of the interfacial oxygen octahedral coupling effect.
In summary, interfacial oxygen octahedral coupling-driven symmetry manipulation is realized in NBT films grown on NSTO and LSMO/STO substrates. With the same epitaxial strain, the a−a−c− OOR pattern of LSMO promotes the formation of M-phase NBT, instead of T-phase with a0a0c0 rotation inherited from the NSTO or STO substrate. The phase evolution process in M-phase and T-phase NBT films was further illustrated, thus facilitating the development of high-performance NBT-based materials. Remarkably, the M-phase NBT film exhibits robust ferroelectricity with a remanent polarization of 42 μC cm−2 and a breakdown strength of 7.89 MV cm−1, which are the highest record among NBT-based films. This result unequivocally reveals that interfacial oxygen octahedral coupling engineering can provide a new degree of freedom for manipulating phase structures and ferroelectricity in NBT as a long-range effect, and is expected to provide an important avenue for manipulating the structures and design multifunctional perovskite oxides for a myriad of applications.
NBT ceramic target was sintered by conventional solid-state reaction. High-purity Bi2O3, TiO2, and Na2CO3 powders were mixed according to the designed stoichiometric proportions, ball-milled for 12 h and then calcined at 850 °C for 3 h. To compensate for the volatilization of Bi and Na during target sintering and film fabrication, 5 mol% Bi and 10 mol% Na were added in excess. The calcined powders were then compacted into disks at 8 MPa for 5 min. Finally, the target was sintered at 1,100 °C for 3 h.
The NBT-L thin film was fabricated on single-crystalline (001)-oriented STO substrates using pulsed laser deposition, with the LSMO film grown as the bottom electrode. The NBT-N thin film was fabricated on (001)-oriented 0.7 wt.% Nb-doped STO (Nb: STO, NSTO) with the same growth condition of NBT-L. For deposition of NBT and LSMO films, a KrF excimer laser, with a wavelength of 248 nm, was used. The NBT-L and NBT-N thin films’ growth was carried out at a heater temperature of 700 °C in a dynamic oxygen pressure of 0.2 mbar with a laser fluence of 0.9 J cm−2 and a laser repetition rate of 2 Hz from the same ceramic target. The LSMO thin film growth was carried out at the same temperature and oxygen pressure with NBT, with a higher laser fluence of 1.2 J cm−2 and a higher laser repetition rate of 5 Hz. After deposition, the films were annealed in an oxygen-enriched environment (200 mbar) for 20 min at the growth temperature, and then slowly cooled down to room temperature at a rate of 5 °C min−1. The sample thickness was controlled by the growth time and calibrated by x-ray reflection.
The crystal structure and epitaxial quality were characterized using an x-ray diffractometer (X'pert Pro2, PANalytical) with Cu Kα1 radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å). For the in situ XRD measurement, the samples were heated from 25 to 500 °C in a vacuum chamber (10−3 mbar). The temperature was ramped at a rate of 20 °C min−1 and maintained for 10 min at each test temperature for stabilization. Cross-sectional TEM samples were prepared using Ga+ ion milling (Zeiss FIB). An ARM-200CF (JEOL) TEM equipped with double spherical aberration (Cs) correctors was used for structure analysis of the NBT thin films. The ABF STEM images were collected at an operating voltage of 200 kV and an acceptance angle of 12 to 24 mrad.
The polarization-dependent and temperature-dependent SHG measurements were performed by using a 800-nm laser (80 MHz, 35 fs) generated from a Ti:sapphire mode-locking femtosecond laser (MaiTai SP, Spectra-Physics) as the fundamental laser beam. The generated SHG signals were then collected by a photomultiplier tube with an optical filter to rule out 800-nm reflected light. For temperature-dependent SHG measurements, a closed heating stage with a sapphire window was used. The temperature was ramped at a rate of 5 °C min−1 controlled by a proportional integral derivative controller with a cycled water-cooling system. During the measurement, the focal spot and the morphology features on the films were checked every 5 min to keep the incident power and the probing region unchanged.
PFM experiments were performed using an Infinity Asylum Research AFM in ambient conditions at room temperature with commercial conductive tips (PPP-EFM, Nanosensors). The PFM signal was collected at the contact resonance frequency with an a.c. tip bias of 1 V. Electrical measurements were carried out with a planar capacitor structure with LSMO or NSTO bottom electrodes and Au top electrodes. Circular Au electrodes of ~60 nm in thickness were sputtered through a stainless-steel shadow mask with holes of ~150 μm in diameter. Note that the real electrode diameter would be slightly larger than 150 μm due to the diffusion during sputtering. The real electrode size (~160 μm) was measured and calibrated with optical microscopy before electrical measurements. Ferroelectric properties were characterized on a Sawyer-Tower circuit (Precision Multiferroic II, Radiant Technologies). Polarization–electric field (P–E) loops and current loops were collected using double bipolar triangular voltage waves with a frequency of 5 kHz. The leakage currents were obtained by applying a multistep DC voltage, with a soak time of 100 ms and a measurement time of 100 ms for each step.
The dielectric breakdown field of NBT-L was derived from the 2 parameter Weibull distribution function [47]:
PEi=1−exp−Ei/Ebβ
where Ei is the measured breakdown field of ith data arranged in ascending number, P(Ei) is the cumulative probability of electric breakdown at Ei, Eb is the statistical Weibull characteristic breakdown field at which P(Ei) equals 63.2%, and the Weibull parameter β evaluates the distribution of Ei. The 2 parameters, Eb and β, can be extrapolated from the linear fitting result of Eq. 2. Fifteen Ei values were collected from different samples for the analysis. The high Weibull moduli can reflect good homogeneity.
lg−ln1−PEi=γlgEi/Eb
1.
Hwang HY, Iwasa Y, Kawasaki M, Keimer B, Nagaosa N, Tokura Y. Emergent phenomena at oxide interfaces. Nat Mater. 2012;11(2):103–113.
2.
Rondinelli JM, May SJ, Freeland JW. Control of octahedral connectivity in perovskite oxide heterostructures: An emerging route to multifunctional materials discovery. MRS Bull. 2012;37(3):261–270.
3.
Tsuei CC, Kirtley JR. Pairing symmetry in cuprate superconductors. Rev Mod Phys. 2000;72(4):969–1016.
4.
Zhang SR, Guo XW, Tang YL, Ma DS, Zhu YL, Wang YJ, Li S, Han MJ, Chen D, Ma JY, et al.Polarization rotation in ultrathin ferroelectrics tailored by interfacial oxygen octahedral coupling. ACS Nano. 2018;12(4):3681–3688.
5.
Li Z, Song D, Yu R, Ge B, Liao Z, Li Y, Dong S, Zhu J. Competing interfacial reconstruction mechanisms in La0.7Sr0.3MnO3/SrTiO3 heterostructures. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8(36):24192–24197.
6.
Liao Z, Huijben M, Zhong Z, Gauquelin N, Macke S, Green RJ, Van Aert S, Verbeeck J, Van Tendeloo G, Held K, et al.Controlled lateral anisotropy in correlated manganite heterostructures by interface-engineered oxygen octahedral coupling. Nat Mater. 2016;15(4):425–431.
7.
Kan D, Aso R, Sato R, Haruta M, Kurata H, Shimakawa Y. Tuning magnetic anisotropy by interfacially engineering the oxygen coordination environment in a transition metal oxide. Nat Mater. 2016;15(4):432–437.
8.
Lee JW, Eom K, Paudel TR, Wang B, Lu H, Huyan HX, Lindemann S, Ryu S, Lee H, Kim TH, et al.In-plane quasi-single-domain BaTiO3 via interfacial symmetry engineering. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):6784.
9.
Chen S, Zhang Q, Li X, Zhao J, Lin S, Jin Q, Hong H, Huon A, Charlton T, Li Q, et al.Atomically engineered cobaltite layers for robust ferromagnetism. Sci Adv. 2022;8(43):Article eabq3981.
10.
Li J, Shen Z, Chen X, Yang S, Zhou W, Wang M, Wang L, Kou Q, Liu Y, Li Q, et al.Grain-orientation-engineered multilayer ceramic capacitors for energy storage applications. Nat Mater. 2020;19(9):999–1005.
11.
Yun C, Webb M, Li W, Wu R, Xiao M, Hellenbrand M, Kursumovic A, Dou H, Gao X, Dhole S, et al.High performance, electroforming-free, thin film memristors using ionic Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3. J Mater Chem C. 2021;9(13):4522–4531.
12.
Liu X, Tan X. Giant strains in non-textured (Bi1/2Na1/2)TiO3-based lead-free ceramics. Adv Mater. 2016;28(3):574–578.
13.
Suchanicz J. Investigations of the phase transition in Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3. Ferroelectrics. 1995;172(1-4):455–458.
14.
Zhou X, Xue G, Luo H, Bowen CR, Zhang D. Phase structure and properties of sodium bismuth titanate lead-free piezoelectric ceramics. Prog Mater Sci. 2021;122:Article 100836.
15.
Viola G, Tian Y, Yu C, Tan Y, Koval V, Wei X, Choy K-L, Yan H. Electric field-induced transformations in bismuth sodium titanate-based materials. Prog Mater Sci. 2021;122:Article 100837.
16.
Gorfman S, Thomas PA. Evidence for a non-rhombohedral average structure in the lead-free piezoelectric material Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3. J Appl Crystallogr. 2010;43:1409–1414.
17.
Levin I, Reaney IM. Nano- and mesoscale structure of Na1/2Bi1/2TiO3: A TEM perspective. Adv Funct Mater. 2012;22(16):3445–3452.
18.
Aksel E, Forrester JS, Jones JL, Thomas PA, Page K, Suchomel MR. Monoclinic crystal structure of polycrystalline Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3. Appl Phys Lett. 2011;98(15):Article 152901.
19.
Dorcet V, Trolliard G, Boullay P. Reinvestigation of phase transitions in Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3 by TEM. Part I: First order rhombohedral to orthorhombic phase transition. Chem Mater. 2008;20(15):5061–5073.
20.
Dorcet V, Trolliard G. A transmission electron microscopy study of the A-site disordered perovskite Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3. Acta Mater. 2008;56(8):1753–1761.
21.
Jones GO, Thomas PA. Investigation of the structure and phase transitions in the novel A-site substituted distorted perovskite compound Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3. Acta Crystallogr B. 2002;58:168–178.
22.
Khatua DK, Mehrotra T, Mishra A, Majumdar B, Senyshyn A, Ranjan R. Anomalous influence of grain size on the global structure, ferroelectric and piezoelectric response of Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3. Acta Mater. 2017;134:177–187.
23.
Groeting M, Kornev I, Dkhil B, Albe K. Pressure-induced phase transitions and structure of chemically ordered nanoregions in the lead-free relaxor ferroelectric Na1/2Bi1/2TiO3. Phys Rev B. 2012;86(13):Article 134118.
24.
Meyer K-C, Groeting M, Albe K. Octahedral tilt transitions in the relaxor ferroelectric Na1/2Bi1/2TiO3. J Solid State Chem. 2015;227:117–122.
25.
Pramanick A, Paterson AR, Denis L, Abbas W, Niu G, Ren W, Zhao J, Dai L, Borkiewicz O, Ren Y, et al.Oxygen octahedral tilt ordering in (Na1/2Bi1/2)TiO3 ferroelectric thin films. Appl Phys Lett. 2020;116(2):Article 022902.
26.
Magalhaes B, Engelhardt S, Molin C, Gebhardt SE, Nielsch K, Huhne R. Structural and electric properties of epitaxial Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3-based thin films. Coatings. 2021;11(6):651.
27.
Song J, Gao J, Zhang S, Luo L, Dai X, Zhao L, Liu B. Structure and electrical properties of Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3 epitaxial films with (110) orientation. Crystals. 2019;9(11):558.
28.
Abou Dargham S, Ponchel F, Abboud N, Soueidan M, Ferri A, Desfeux R, Assaad J, Remiens D, Zaouk D. Synthesis and electrical properties of lead-free piezoelectric Bi0.5Na0.5TiO3 thin films prepared by sol-gel method. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2018;38(4):1450–1455.
29.
Zhao Y, Hao X, Li M. Dielectric properties and energy-storage performance of (Na0.5Bi0.5)TiO3 thick films. J Alloys Compd. 2014;601:112–115.
30.
Hemberger J, Krimmel A, Kurz T, von Nidda HAK, Ivanov VY, Mukhin AA, Balbashov AM, Loidl A. Structural, magnetic, and electrical properties of single-crystalline La1-xSrxMnO3 (0.4 < x < 0.85). Phys Rev B. 2002;66(9):Article 094410.
31.
Glazer AM. The classification of tilted octahedra in perovskites. Acta Crystallogr Sect B: Struct Sci. 1972;28(11):3384–3392.
32.
Saghayezhian M, Kouser S, Wang Z, Guo H, Jin R, Zhang J, Zhu Y, Pantelides ST, Plummer EW. Atomic-scale determination of spontaneous magnetic reversal in oxide heterostructures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(21):10309–10316.
33.
Liao ZL, Green RJ, Gauquelin N, Macke S, Li L, Gonnissen J, Sutarto R, Houwman EP, Zhong ZC, Van Aert S, et al.Long-range domain structure and symmetry engineering by interfacial oxygen octahedral coupling at heterostructure interface. Adv Funct Mater. 2016;26(36):6627–6634.
34.
Ma C, Guo H, Beckman SP, Tan X. Creation and destruction of morphotropic phase boundaries through electrical poling: A case study of lead-free (Bi1/2Na1/2)TiO3-BaTiO3 piezoelectrics. Phys Rev Lett. 2012;109(10):Article 107602.
35.
Rao BN, Datta R, Chandrashekaran SS, Mishra DK, Sathe V, Senyshyn A, Ranjan R. Local structural disorder and its influence on the average global structure and polar properties in Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3. Phys Rev B. 2013;88(22):Article 224103.
36.
Cao L, Petracic O, Zakalek P, Weber A, Ruecker U, Schubert J, Koutsioubas A, Mattauch S, Brueckel T. Reversible control of physical properties via an oxygen-vacancy-driven topotactic transition in epitaxial La0.7Sr0.3MnO3-δ thin films. Adv Mater. 2019;31(7):Article 1806183.
37.
Roh CJ, Jung M-C, Kim JR, Go K-J, Kim J, Oh HJ, Jo Y-R, Shin YJ, Choi JG, Kim B-J, et al.Polar metal phase induced by oxygen octahedral network relaxation in oxide thin films. Small. 2020;16(40):2003055.
38.
Denev SA, Lummen TTA, Barnes E, Kumar A, Gopalan V. Probing ferroelectrics using optical second harmonic generation. J Am Ceram Soc. 2011;94(9):2699–2727.
39.
Trassin M, De Luca G, Manz S, Fiebig M. Probing ferroelectric domain engineering in BiFeO3 thin films by second harmonic generation. Adv Mater. 2015;27(33):4871–4876.
40.
Li W, Ma Y, Feng T, Du Z, Liu Y, Kalinin SV, Li J-F, Li Q. Delineating complex ferroelectric domain structures via second harmonic generation spectral imaging. J Materiomics. 2023;9(2):395–402.
41.
Roh CJ, Hamh SY, Woo C-S, Kim K-E, Yang C-H, Lee JS. Ferroelectric domain states of a tetragonal BiFeO3 thin film investigated by second harmonic generation microscopy. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2017;12:353.
42.
Pan H, Lan S, Xu S, Zhang Q, Yao H, Liu Y, Meng F, Guo E-J, Gu L, Yi D, et al.Ultrahigh energy storage in superparaelectric relaxor ferroelectrics. Science. 2021;374(6563):100–104.
43.
Wang J, Jin K, Yao H, Gu J, Xu X, Ge C, Wang C, He M, Yang G. Temperature-dependent phase transition in barium titanate crystals probed by second harmonic generation. Appl Phys Lett. 2018;112(10):Article 102904.
44.
Yin J, Zong H, Tao H, Tao X, Wu H, Zhang Y, Zhao L-D, Ding X, Sun J, Zhu J, et al.Nanoscale bubble domains with polar topologies in bulk ferroelectrics. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):3632.
45.
Tagantsev AK, Pawlaczyk C, Brooks K, Setter N. Built-in electric field assisted nucleation and coercive fields in ferroelectric thin films. Integr Ferroelectr. 1994;4(1):1–12.
46.
Pertsev NA, Contreras JR, Kukhar VG, Hermanns B, Kohlstedt H, Waser R. Coercive field of ultrathin Pb(Zr0.52Ti0.48)O3 epitaxial films. Appl Phys Lett. 2003;83(16):3356–3358.
47.
Liu Y, Han H, Pan H, Lan S, Lin Y, Ma J. Enhancement of breakdown strength in relaxor ferroelectric Ba(Zr0.3Ti0.7)O3 thin film via manipulating growth oxygen pressure. J Alloys Compd. 2023;937:Article 168452.
48.
Zannen M, Dietze M, Khemakhem H, Es-Souni M. Ferroelectric (Na1/2Bi1/2)TiO3 thin films showing photoluminescence properties. Appl Phys A-Mater. 2014;117(3):1485–1490.
49.
Gallegos-Melgar A, Espinosa-Arbelaez DG, Flores-Ruiz FJ, Lahmar A, Dellis JL, Lemee N, Espinoza-Beltran FJ, Munoz-Saldana J. Ferroelectric properties of manganese doped (Bi1/2Na1/2)TiO3 and (Bi1/2Na1/2)TiO3-BaTiO3 epitaxial thin films. Appl Surf Sci. 2015;359:923–930.
50.
Afifi M, Turky AO, Rasly M, Rashad MM, Turner JA. Field-induced polarization response and energy storage behavior of lead-free BNT-BKT-SZ films. Ceram Int. 2020;46(16):26061–26068.
51.
Daryapurkar AS, Kolte JT, Apte PR, Gopalan P. Structural and electrical properties of sodium bismuth titanate (Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3) thin films optimized using the Taguchi approach. Ceram Int. 2014;40(1):2441–2450.
52.
Xie Y, Hao H, Xie J, He Z, Zhang S, Li Z, Cao M, Yao Z, Liu H. The energy-storage performance and dielectric properties of (0.94-x) BNT-0.06BT-xST thin films prepared by sol–gel method. J Alloys Compd. 2021;860:Article 158164.
53.
Wu S, Song B, Li P, Shen B, Zhai J. Revealing the relationship between morphotropic phase boundary and tolerance factor of Bi0.5Na0.5TiO3-based thin films. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2020;40(8):2954–2963.
54.
Daryapurkar AS, Kolte JT, Gopalan P. Influence of oxygen gas pressure on phase, microstructure and electrical properties of sodium bismuth titanate thin films grown using pulsed laser deposition. Thin Solid Films. 2015;579:44–49.
55.
Bousquet M, Duclere JR, Gautier B, Boulle A, Wu A, Deputier S, Fasquelle D, Remondiere F, Albertini D, Champeaux C, et al.Electrical properties of (110) epitaxial lead-free ferroelectric Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3 thin films grown by pulsed laser deposition: Macroscopic and nanoscale data. J Appl Phys. 2012;111(10):Article 104106.
56.
Zhou H, Liu X, Qin N, Bao D. Strong red emission in lead-free ferroelectric Pr3+-doped Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3 thin films without the need of charge compensation. J Appl Phys. 2011;110(3):Article 034102.
57.
Abazari M, Safari A, Bharadwaja SSN, Trolier-McKinstry S. Dielectric and piezoelectric properties of lead-free (Bi,Na)TiO3-based thin films. Appl Phys Lett. 2010;96(8):Article 082903.
58.
Wang DY, Chan NY, Li S, Choy SH, Tian HY, Chan HLW. Enhanced ferroelectric and piezoelectric properties in doped lead-free (Bi0.5Na0.5)0.94Ba0.06TiO3 thin films. Appl Phys Lett. 2010;97(21):Article 212901.
59.
Guo Y, Akai D, Sawada K, Ishida M. Dielectric and ferroelectric properties of highly (100)-oriented (Na0.5Bi0.5)0.94Ba0.06TiO3 thin films grown on LaNiO3/gamma-Al2O3/si substrates by chemical solution deposition. Solid State Sci. 2008;10(7):928–933.
60.
Zhou ZH, Xue JM, Li WZ, Wang J, Zhu H, Miao JM. Ferroelectric and electrical behavior of (Na0.5Bi0.5)TiO3 thin films. Appl Phys Lett. 2004;85(5):804–806.
Year 2023 volume 6 Issue 7
PDF
40
22
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.34133/research.0191
  • Receive Date:2023-02-23
  • Online Date:2026-10-28
  • Published:2023-07-20
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2023-02-23
  • Accepted:2023-06-18
Affiliations
    1State Key Laboratory of New Ceramics and Fine Processing, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
    2Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.

Corresponding:

* Address correspondence to:
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/research/EN/10.34133/research.0191
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT