收藏切换
Inflatable Metamorphic Origami
收藏切换
PDF
Sen Wang1, Peng Yan1, Hailin Huang1, 2, *, Ning Zhang1, Bing Li1, 2, 3
Research. Vol 6 Article ID 0133
Less
收藏切换
Research. Vol 6 Article ID 0133
• Research Article •
Inflatable Metamorphic Origami
Full
Sen Wang1, Peng Yan1, Hailin Huang1, 2, *, Ning Zhang1, Bing Li1, 2, 3
Affiliations
  • 1School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518052, P.R. China.
  • 2Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Intelligent Morphing Mechanisms and Adaptive Robotics, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518052, P. R. China.
  • 3State Key Laboratory of Robotics and System, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, P.R. China.
About Author:

† These authors contributed equally to this work.

Published: 2023-05-20 doi: 10.34133/research.0133
Outline
收藏切换

This study created a new type of inflatable metamorphic origami that has the advantage of being a highly simplified deployable system capable of realizing multiple sequential motion patterns with a monolithic actuation. The main body of the proposed metamorphic origami unit was designed as a soft inflatable metamorphic origami chamber with multiple sets of contiguous/collinear creases. In response to pneumatic pressure, the metamorphic motions are characterized by an initial unfolding around the first set of contiguous/collinear creases followed by another unfolding around the second set of contiguous/collinear creases. Furthermore, the effectiveness of the proposed approach was verified by constructing a radial deployable metamorphic origami for supporting the deployable planar solar array, a circumferential deployable metamorphic origami for supporting the deployable curved-surface antenna, a multi-fingered deployable metamorphic origami grasper for grasping large-sized objects, and a leaf-shaped deployable metamorphic origami grasper for capturing heavy objects. The proposed novel metamorphic origami is expected to serve as a foundation for designing lightweight, high-deploy/fold-ratio, low-energy-consumption space deployable systems.

Sen Wang, Peng Yan, Hailin Huang, Ning Zhang, Bing Li. Inflatable Metamorphic Origami[J]. Research, 2023 , 6 (5) : 0133 - . DOI: 10.34133/research.0133
Deployable systems are thought to be an ideal solution for developing special intelligent systems that must change shape to a smaller size for easy storage and transportation while being deployed into a larger volume configuration to reach a large working space [1–4]. Deployable space systems [5–8], soft morphing robots [9–12], origami-inspired robots [13–17] and structures [18–22], and metamaterials [23–27] are some typical examples. The ability to deploy these systems makes them extremely flexible and adaptable to complex working environments.
Traditionally, deployable systems were always designed with fixed mobility [28–30]. Such fixed-mobility deployable systems are capable of realizing only a unique motion pattern, which can only conduct a single deploying or folding motion [31,32]. However, many systems may require additional manipulation motion tasks to be performed after the deployment motion. Therefore, traditionally, such deployable systems were mostly designed with an independent deployment motion and a manipulation motion, both of which were actuated by two separate actuation systems [33]. Such a design, however, had a greater energy consumption, higher complexity, and increased massiveness. In order to realize changeable mobility for a given mechanism, the metamorphic mechanism was first proposed by Dai and Jones [34], and many metamorphic systems have been developed in recent years [35,36]. However, a metamorphic system always needs an additional actuation system to adjust its mobility, such that the system is still very complicated [37]. In this context, a metamorphic system capable of generating multiple sequential motion patterns under a monolithic actuation source could be a suitable solution, although this research area remains relatively unexplored. A simple metamorphic origami unit in Fig. 1 is a typical example of such a system, its mobility multi-furcation property could inspire a set of novel deployable systems with multiple sequential motion patterns.
The inflatable metamorphic origami proposed in the present study is capable of generating sequential deploying and bending motions in response to pneumatic pressure. This special pattern of motion is characterized by a sequence of motions comprising an initial unfolding around the first set of contiguous/collinear creases followed by another unfolding around another set of contiguous/collinear creases as the pneumatic pressure increases. Next, to verify the effectiveness of the proposed novel metamorphic origami, the following were developed: a radial deployable metamorphic origami for supporting the deployable planar solar array, a circumferential deployable metamorphic origami for supporting the deployable curved-surface antenna, a multi-fingered deployable metamorphic origami grasper for grasping large-sized objects, and a leaf-shaped deployable metamorphic origami grasper for capturing heavy objects. All these deployable systems demonstrated that each metamorphic origami could, under a single actuation, realize multiple sequential motion patterns such as the deployment motion, bending motion for grasping objects, or multiple stable configurations for supporting loads.
Figure 1 shows a metamorphic origami unit with mobility multi-furcation. The origami unit comprised 4 facets and 4 creases. In the folded configuration [(i) in Fig. 1A], the unit could be unfolded around the contiguous creases C2 and C4; in this configuration, creases C1 and C3 are neither contiguous nor collinear. When the unit begins to unfold [(ii) in Fig. 1A], it would, at a certain point, reach a unique intermediate configuration in which creases C1 and C3 are collinear [(iii) in Fig. 1A]. This configuration is the first metamorphic configuration of the origami unit. In this metamorphic configuration, the origami has a mobility bifurcation, such that the origami could continue to unfold around the contiguous creases C2 and C4 or unfold around the new collinear creases C1 and C3. If the origami was unfolded around the collinear creases C1 and C3, then the creases C2 and C4 would no longer be contiguous, thereby preventing the origami unit from being rotated around creases C2 and C4 again [(iv) in Fig. 1A]. The origami is incapable of sustaining load as it is possible to rotate it around creases C1 and C3 [(i) in Fig. 1B]. The unit then continues to unfold to another special intermediate configuration in which creases C2 and C4 are also collinear. This configuration is the second metamorphic configuration of the origami [(v) in Fig. 1A]. In the metamorphic configuration 2, the origami also has a mobility bifurcation. When the origami is rotated around the collinear creases C2 and C4, it moves into another motion pattern until the creases C1 and C3 are no longer collinear [(vi) in Fig. 1A]. After that, the origami would not rotate around creases C1 and C3 again, i.e., the rotation around creases C1 and C3 would be locked. In other words, origami has load-bearing ability in this configuration [(ii) in Fig. 1B and Movie S1]. The metamorphic origami unit with 4 facets and 4 creases was evaluated quantitatively using the ABAQUS software. The simulation process is illustrated in Note S2. Figure 1C illustrates the stiffness of the metamorphic origami unit when the origami unit was folded around the collinear creases C2 and C4 from the metamorphic configuration. The stiffness was observed to increase as the folding angle was decreased. This property demonstrates that, in the metamorphic configuration, the stiffness is close to zero, which enables the origami unit to be folded around the collinear creases C1 and C3. If the origami unit is folded around another set of collinear creases C2 and C4, the creases C1 and C3 no longer remain collinear, and the stiffness is increased further. This implies that the origami unit would no longer be folded around creases C1 and C3 again, i.e., the origami unit has force sustainability. In addition, it was demonstrated that, as the elastic modulus of the origami unit's facet panels increased, the origami unit's stiffness also increased (Fig. 1D). Therefore, a facet with an adequate modulus of elasticity had to be designed if large stiffness was required.
The inflatable metamorphic unit was designed based on the metamorphic origami unit with 4 facets, and a soft pneumatic chamber was used to drive the inflatable origami unit to move from one movement pattern to another. Figure 2A depicts an inflatable metamorphic origami unit with 8 identity rectangular facets attached to a polyethylene (PE) lay flat tube. The soft chamber of the origami was driven by a monolithic pneumatic actuator. Because the air pressure in the chamber was monotonic increasing, then the air capacity of the chamber is also a monotonic increasing process. The inflatable metamorphic origami is initially folded with 2 sets of contiguous creases [(i) in Fig. 2A], namely, the collinear creases C5 and C6, which are contiguous with the collinear creases C2 and C4, such that the inflatable origami can only be unfolded around these 2 sets of contiguous creases in response to increasing pneumatic pressure [refer to (ii) in Fig. 2A]. The folding angle θ is large in this stage, and the extension angle φ is small; based on the stiffness behavior described in Note S2, the stiffness along the extension motion is weaker than the stiffness along the inflation motion of the chamber; thus, the motion in this stage is extension-dominant. When the inflatable metamorphic origami unit reaches the metamorphic configuration in which the creases C1 (C7) and C3 (C8) are collinear [(iii) in Fig. 2A], the origami will change the motion pattern of unfolding around the creases C2 and C4 to that around the creases C1 (C7) and C3 (C8), e.g., the motion pattern changes from extension-dominant to inflation-dominant. When the air input reaches the maximum capacity of the chamber, the origami stops inflating. The origami chamber inflates to maximum capacity when the rhomboid cross-section of the chamber reaches the maximum area value, e.g., folding angle θ = 90° [(iv) in Fig. 2A]. The equivalent pin-jointed truss frame model was established to show the stiffness behavior of this inflatable metamorphic origami unit during the metamorphic deployment process, which verifies that when this inflatable metamorphic origami unit is at maximum capacity state, i.e., folding angle θ = 90°, it has maximum stiffness (Fig. 2B and Note S3). When the inflatable metamorphic origami unit is at minimum capacity, i.e., the folding angle θ = 0° or θ = 180°, the inflatable metamorphic origami is at 2 metamorphic positions, the stiffness of the inflatable metamorphic origami unit in these 2 states are approximate to 0, and the unit can be rotated around the contiguous creases. A physical prototype was also fabricated to demonstrate the sequential deployment process of the inflatable metamorphic origami unit (Fig. 2C) and the load capacity in the deployed configuration (Fig. 2D). The weight of the unit was 8.5 g. Initially, the unit could be folded around the contiguous creases with no payload-sustaining ability. When the unit was inflated, it could sustain a payload of approximately 400 g, which is around 47 times its weight, without much deformation. When the payload continuously increased beyond this weight, the unit generated evident deformation (800 g) (Movie S2).
The inflatable metamorphic origami developed in the present study is capable of realizing an initial deployment motion followed by a stable load-bearing status and could, therefore, be used for supporting large-scale deployable solar arrays in space applications (Movie S3). A branch unit of the developed metamorphic origami is depicted in Fig. 3A. The branch unit of the metamorphic origami was designed as a soft origami chamber with a rhombic cross-section in the deployed configuration, and all creases in this origami are rigid creases (Note S1). Initially, the branch unit is folded into a compact zigzag-shaped configuration [(i) in Fig. 3A]. In this configuration, the upper lateral creases and the lower lateral creases at the 2 ends of each rigid facet are contiguous, and it is possible to deploy the branch unit around these contiguous creases to generate the first deployment motion in response to the air pressure [(ii) in Fig. 3A]. After the origami continues to deploy into the metamorphic configuration with longitudinal collinear creases [(iii) in Fig. 3A], the upper lateral creases and the lower lateral creases are no longer contiguous as the air pressure continues to increase, causing the rotations around the first set of contiguous creases to be locked [(iv) in Fig. 3A]. Using this branch, the radial deployable metamorphic origami with 4 branch units was developed to support a large deployable planar solar array (Fig. 3B and C). The deployment process of this deployable solar array using the developed metamorphic origami is illustrated in Fig. 3D. This origami reaches a considerably high deploy/fold ratio; the deploy/fold ratio for each branch was approximately 38.8, while the deploy area/fold area ratio for the developed radial deployable metamorphic origami with 4 branches supporting a deployable planar solar array was approximately 20.8.
The metamorphic origami developed in this study can generate sequential unfolding motions around various sets of contiguous/collinear creases, which were characterized by a large initial deployment motion followed by a stable load-bearing status. The creases in this origami could only generate rotational motions for folding/unfolding. Furthermore, due to the flexibility of the soft creases, this origami had a slight thickness accommodation, which is especially important for the folding/unfolding motion of contiguous creases. However, the creases must be precise to maintain load-bearing capability and provide strict geometric constraints to the origami to generate a kinematically guided origami folding, similar to a rigid mechanism. Therefore, this type of origami crease was termed a rigid crease (Note S1).
In order to demonstrate the versatility of the developed metamorphic origami, a circumferential deployable metamorphic origami was developed to support a large deployable curved-surface antenna, which would be able to generate an initial deployment motion of a large magnitude followed by a bending motion for adjusting the curvature of the supporting deployable curved-surface antenna (Movie S4). Similar to radial deployable metamorphic origami, circumferential deployable metamorphic origami also comprises 4 branches. In the initial folded configuration, these branches are folded around the rigid folding contiguous creases that surround a square mounting base [Fig. 4A(i) and Fig. S6H]. In response to increasing air pressure, the branch first deploys into an unbent status [(ii) in Fig. 4A], which is a metamorphic configuration with 4 longitudinal collinear creases. Next, the branch continues to inflate around the 4 longitudinal collinear creases in response to the air pressure until it reaches the second metamorphic configuration in which the cross-section of the branch becomes triangular [(iii) in Fig. 4A]. In this configuration, the creases for the initial deployment are no longer contiguous, causing the unfolding around these creases to be locked. In the second metamorphic configuration, the origami reaches new lateral collinear creases, enabling the branch to be unfolded around the lateral collinear creases as the air pressure increases. In order to realize the bending motion around the lateral collinear creases, the design used stretchable creases, capable of generating both folding/unfolding motion and stretching motion owing to their wrinkled structure. Different from what was reported in a previous study [13], this stretching motion realized in the present study was not due to the stretching of the soft body and rather due to the stretching motion of the wrinkled structure (Note S1). In the first deployment motion, this metamorphic origami branch was deployed around the rigid creases, similar to a rigid mechanism. The stretchable creases provided adaptive accommodation motion without introducing kinematic constraints, and this was termed a rigid-dominant motion. When the branch was moved to the metamorphic configuration 2 [(iii) in Fig. 4A], it could be unfolded around the lateral collinear creases to generate a bending motion. In this process, the lateral collinear creases worked as rigid folding creases, which ensured the kinematic constraints and precise motion. On the other hand, the stretchable creases worked in the stretching motion to provide the bending actuation force. The bending motion of the origami branch was, therefore, a superimposition of the rigid geometry-driven motion generated by rigid creases and the stretching motion generated from the stretchable creases [(iv) in Fig. 4A and Note S1]. The bending motion of this origami was, therefore, termed the rigid-flexible coupling motion. This branch was used for developing a circumferential deployable metamorphic origami with 4 branch units to support a large deployable curved-surface antenna (Fig. 4B and C). The deployment process of the deployable curved-surface antenna driven by this metamorphic origami is illustrated in Fig. 4D. The circumferential deployable metamorphic origami reached a considerably high deploy/fold ratio of 29.1 for the prototype developed in the present study.
The developed circumferential deployable metamorphic origami exhibited sequential motion patterns under a single pneumatic actuation that could be applied to soft deployable robotic systems. Two types of deployable metamorphic origami graspers were developed in the present study to demonstrate the potential versatile applications. The first type of grasper was a multi-fingered deployable grasper. The architecture of this multi-fingered metamorphic origami grasper was similar to that of the circumferential deployable metamorphic origami, which could generate sequential deployment motions to realize a large working space motion and a bending motion for grasping large-sized objects. Initially, the branch is folded into a zigzag-shaped configuration [(i) in Fig. 5A]. As the air pressure increased, the branch was first deployed into an unbend configuration around the contiguous creases (rigid-dominant), which was followed by a motion in which the branch reached the first unbend metamorphic configuration with 6 longitudinal collinear creases [(iii) in Fig. 5A]. Subsequently, the origami continued to inflate to the second metamorphic configuration with a rectangular cross-section by unfolding around these longitudinal collinear creases [(iv) in Fig. 5A]; this process was also termed a rigid-dominant process. In the second metamorphic configuration, the creases for the initial deployment [(ii) in Fig. 5A] no longer remained contiguous, causing the unfolding around these creases to be locked. With the continuous increase in the air pressure, the stretchable creases begin working, thereby generating a bending motion for grasping large -sized objects [(v) in Fig. 5A]. This bending motion process is a rigid-flexible coupling motion process generated by both rigid creases and stretchable creases. This branch was then used for developing a triple-fingered deployable grasper for grasping large -sized objects (Fig. 5B and C). Next, to demonstrate the size adaptability of this metamorphic origami grasper in grasping large -sized objects, grasping experiments were conducted (Movie S5). The entire grasping process of this grasper based on metamorphic origami is illustrated in Fig. 5D. The grasper was observed to be capable of grasping objects 3 times its size.
The second type of grasper was the leaf-shaped deployable grasper, which had branches with a vegetal leaf-shaped structure. The grasper comprised 3 leaf-shaped branches, which could generate an enveloping motion for grasping heavy objects (Fig. 6B). Initially, the branches are folded around a mounting base [(i) in Fig. 6A and Fig. S8G]. The branches could then be deployed around the longitudinal contiguous creases circumferentially into the first metamorphic configuration [(i) and (ii) in Fig. 6A]. Afterward, the branches could be continued to be deployed around another set of lateral contiguous and collinear creases [(iii) in Fig. 6A] to the second metamorphic configuration [(iv) in Fig. 6A]. In the second metamorphic configuration, a new longitudinal collinear crease was reached, which enabled the generation of a slight folding motion of the origami around this collinear crease; combined with bending motion, these 2 motions achieve envelope grasping together [(v) in Fig. 6A]. This branch was then used for developing a deployable grasper for grasping heavy objects (Fig. 6B to D). The diameter of the grasper in folded configuration was 8 cm. The diameter of the object was approximately 16 cm, which is 2 times that of the grasper in the folded configuration. The total weight of the 3 branches was 45 g, while the grasper could grasp an object weighing up to 377.3 g, which is 8.3 times the weight of the grasper (Movie S6).
The current study created a new type of inflatable metamorphic origami that could achieve sequential functionally different motion patterns with a single actuator. The developed metamorphic origami unit has applications such as the basic module of high-deploy/fold-ratio, lightweight, and large-workspace deployable robotic systems that require performing both deployment and other manipulation motions. The present study also demonstrated a few robotic applications of the developed pneumatic-driven metamorphic origami unit. The versatility of the metamorphic origami systems was demonstrated by constructing a set of deployable robotic systems based on the metamorphic origami units, namely, a radial deployable metamorphic origami for supporting a deployable planar solar array, a circumferential deployable metamorphic origami for supporting a deployable curved-surface antenna, a multi-fingered deployable metamorphic origami grasper for grasping large-sized objects, and a leaf-shaped deployable metamorphic origami grasper for capturing heavy objects. All these robots demonstrated that each of the developed metamorphic origami units could realize multiple sequential motion patterns, such as the deployment motion to reach a large working space, a bending motion for grasping objects, or multiple stable configurations for supporting loads under a single actuation. The design approach proposed in the present study is also potentially applicable to other existing origami structures. The proposed approach offers a novel solution for designing lightweight deployable systems capable of being deployed into a considerably large-volume working configuration. This would be particularly advantageous for application in space robots, in which the storage cabin space of the rocket is quite small while the operation is in a large-volume status when in orbit. Future work could include improving self-folding ability, developing novel durable materials for soft chamber fabrication, and developing lightweight, high-stiffness rigid panels for origami facets.
The flexible PE lay flat tubes (thickness: 0.1 mm) were used for fabricating the pneumatic inflatable soft origami chambers. The carbon fiber sheets (thickness: 0.4 mm for the radial and circumferential deployable metamorphic origami and 0.3 mm for the multi-fingered deployable metamorphic origami grasper) and the flexible polyvinyl chloride sheets (thickness: 0.5 mm for the leaf-shaped deployable metamorphic origami) were used for fabricating the rigid facets of the metamorphic origami. The mounting bases of the metamorphic origami were fabricated using high-toughness photosensitive resin through 3D printing technology.
The rigid facets were attached to the flexible PE lay flat tubes to obtain the creases of the metamorphic origami between the adjacent facets. The metamorphic origami was fabricated according to the following rules:
1. Kapton double-sided sticky tapes (0.1 mm thick) were used to attach the rigid facets to the inflatable soft PE lay flat tubes (Fig. S4A).
2. The terminal of the PE lay flat tube was sealed using a heat sealer (PFS-300; Baijie Ltd.) to form the pneumatic chambers for each branch (Fig. S4B).
3. In order to realize the metamorphic origami with both deployment motion and bending motion, the stretchable creases were first squeezed to form wrinkles with the same gap as that in the rigid creases. The rigid creases responsible for the geometric folding/unfolding were glued using the 3M610–1PK tape (Scotch; 3M Ltd.) to ensure their non-stretchability; consequently, these rigid creases could generate pure folding/unfolding motion (Fig. S4C). The stretchable creases owed their stretchability and foldability to the wrinkled structure, which provided space for the bending motion. The bending motion could then be generated through the folding/unfolding motion of the rigid creases combined with the stretching motion of the stretchable creases.
4. In order to obtain the rigid creases of the radial deployable metamorphic origami, the outer surface of the facets was glued using the 3M610–1PK tape (Scotch; 3M Ltd.) to render it non-stretchable (Fig. S4C). This also improved the stiffness of the origami.
5. The non-sealed ends of the origami branches were glued on the mounting interfaces of the base using double-sided sticky tape (Fig. S4D).
6. Sil-Poxy silicone adhesive (Smooth-On Inc.) was also used to seal the mounting interfaces of all branches to produce a deployable metamorphic origami with adequate airtightness (Fig. S4E).
All deployable metamorphic origami designed in the present study were controlled using a pneumatic source system. Each deployable metamorphic origami was actuated using a single pneumatic source through a soft polyurethane tube. The air pressure was controlled using a servo valve.
The stiffness simulations were performed using the commercially available FEA software named ABAQUS (Dassault System). Rectangular rigid panels were attached to a soft membrane to establish the origami simulation model. The rigid facets were formed using an acrylic plate material, while the membrane was formed of paper material. The elastic modulus values of the rigid facets and the soft membrane were set to 3,300 MPa and 0.5 MPa, respectively, while the Poisson ratio for both rigid facets and the soft membrane was set to 0.2. Consequently, the crease could be obtained between the 2 adjacent rigid panels due to the difference between the stiffness of the rigid panels and that of the membrane (Fig. S2B and Note S2). In order to perform the stiffness simulation, the 2 edges of the facets of the metamorphic origami unit were fixed, and 2 identical loading forces were applied to the 2 edges of the other 2 facets opposite to the fixed ends. The loads were applied along the direction of the bisector of the folding angle (Fig. S2D). The stiffness of a point was calculated by measuring the displacement of the force loading point along the direction of the loads (Note S2). The stiffness behavior of the inflatable metamorphic origami unit was analyzed by establishing the equivalent pin-jointed truss frame model (Note S3).
1.
Guest SD, Pellegrino S. A new concept for solid surface deployable antennas. Acta Astronaut. 1996;38(2):103–113.
2.
Wang S, Gao Y, Huang H, Li B, Guo H, Liu R. Design of deployable curved-surface rigid origami flashers. Mech Mach Theory. 2022;167:Article 104512.
3.
Ma J, Feng H, Chen Y, Hou D, You Z. Folding of tubular waterbomb. Research. 2020;2020:Article 1735081.
4.
Nelson TG, Zimmerman TK, Magleby SP, Lang RJ, Howell LL. Developable mechanisms on developable surfaces. Sci Robot. 2019;4(27):Article eaau5171.
5.
Wang R, Sun J, Dai JS. Design analysis and type synthesis of a petal-inspired space deployable-foldable mechanism. Mech Mach Theory. 2019;141:151–170.
6.
Wang S, Huang H, Jia G, Li B, Guo H, Liu R. Design of a novel three-limb deployable mechanism with mobility bifurcation. Mech Mach Theory. 2022;172:Article 104789.
7.
Morgan J, Magleby SP, Howell LL. An approach to designing origami-adapted aerospace mechanisms. J Mech Des. 2016;138(5):Article 052301.
8.
Zirbel SA, Lang RJ, Thomson MW, Sigel DA, Walkemeyer PE, Trease BP, Magleby SP, Howell LL. Accommodating thickness in origami-based deployable arrays. J Mech Des. 2013;135(11):Article 111005.
9.
Kim W, Eom J, Cho K-J. A dual-origami design that enables the quasisequential deployment and bending motion of soft robots and grippers. Adv Intell Syst. 2022;4(3):Article 2100176.
10.
Cui Y, Liu X-J, Dong X, Zhou J, Zhao H. Enhancing the universality of a pneumatic gripper via continuously adjustable initial grasp postures. IEEE Trans Robot. 2021;37(5):1604–1618.
11.
Xie Z, Domel AG, An N, Green C, Gong Z, Wang T, Knubben EM, Weaver JC, Bertoldi K, Wen L. Octopus arm-inspired tapered soft actuators with suckers for improved grasping. Soft Robotics. 2020;7(5):639–648.
12.
Chen L, Zhao W, Ma J, Yang M, Liu X, Zhang L, Chen Y. A humidity-powered soft robot with fast rolling locomotion. Research. 2022;2022:Article 9832901.
13.
Li S, Vogt DM, Rus D, Wood RJ. Fluid-driven origami-inspired artificial muscles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114(50):13132–13137.
14.
Taghavi M, Helps T, Rossiter J. Electro-ribbon actuators and electro-origami robots. Sci Robot. 2018;3(25):Article eaau9795.
15.
Rus D, Sung C. Spotlight on origami robots. Sci Robot. 2018;3(15):Article eaat0938.
16.
Kim W, Byun J, Kim J-K, Choi W-Y, Jakobsen K, Jakobsen J, Lee D-Y, Cho K-J. Bioinspired dual-morphing stretchable origami. Sci Robot. 2019;4(36):Article eaay3493.
17.
Chen Y, Wang H, Helbling EF, Jafferis NT, Zufferey R, Ong A, Ma K, Gravish N, Chirarattananon P, Kovac M, et al.A biologically inspired, flapping-wing, hybrid aerial-aquatic microrobot. Sci Robot. 2017;2(11):Article eaao5619.
18.
Xu B, Zhang X, Tian Z, Han D, Fan X, Chen Y, Di Z, Qiu T, Mei Y. Microdroplet-guided intercalation and deterministic delamination towards intelligent rolling origami. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):Article 5019.
19.
Baek S-M, Yim S, Chae S-H, Lee D-Y, Cho K-J. Ladybird beetle–inspired compliant origami. Sci Robot. 2020;5(41):Article eaaz6262.
20.
Meloni M, Cai J, Zhang Q, Lee DSH, Li M, Ma R, Parashkevov TE, Feng J. Engineering origami: A comprehensive review of recent applications, design methods, and tools. Adv Sci. 2021;8:Article 2000636.
21.
Meloni M, Zhang Q, Pak J, Bilore M, Ruijun M, Ballegaard E, Lee DSH, Cai J. Designing origami tessellations composed of quadrilateral meshes and degree-4 vertices for engineering applications. Autom Constr. 2022;142:Article 104482.
22.
Zhang Q, Li Y, Kueh ABH, Qian Z, Cai J. Folding responses of origami-inspired structures connected by groove compliant joints. J Mech Robot. 2022;14(3):Article 031010.
23.
Fang H, Chu S-CA, Xia Y, Wang K-W. Programmable self-locking origami mechanical metamaterials. Adv Mater. 2018;30(15):Article 1706311.
24.
Li S, Wang KW. Fluidic origami: A plant-inspired adaptive structure with shape morphing and stiffness tuning. Smart Mater Struct. 2015;24(10):Article 105031.
25.
Wu R, Roberts PCE, Lyu S, Zheng F, Soutis C, Diver C, Zhou D, Li L, Deng Z. Lightweight self-forming super-elastic mechanical metamaterials with adaptive stiffness. Adv Funct Mater. 2021;31(6):Article 2008252.
26.
Wen L, Pan F, Ding X. Tensegrity metamaterials for soft robotics. Sci Robot. 2020;5(45):Article eabd9158.
27.
Lyu S, Qin B, Deng H, Ding X. Origami-based cellular mechanical metamaterials with tunable Poisson’s ratio: Construction and analysis. Int J Mech Sci. 2021;212:Article 106791.
28.
Forterre Y, Skotheim JM, Dumais J, Mahadevan L. How the Venus flytrap snaps. Nature. 2005;433(7024):421–425.
29.
Liu S, Zhu Y, Zhang Z, Fang Z, Tan J, Peng J, Song C, Asada HH, Wang Z. Otariidae-inspired soft-robotic supernumerary flippers by fabric kirigami and origami. IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron. 2021;26(5):2747–2757.
30.
Wani OM, Zeng H, Priimagi A. A light-driven artificial flytrap. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):Article 15546.
31.
Harrington MJ, Razghandi K, Ditsch F, Guiducci L, Rueggeberg M, Dunlop JWC, Fratzl P, Neinhuis C, Burgert I. Origami-like unfolding of hydro-actuated ice plant seed capsules. Nat Commun. 2011;2(1):Article 337.
32.
Jin T, Li L, Wang T, Wang G, Cai J, Tian Y, Zhang Q. Origami-inspired soft actuators for stimulus perception and crawling robot applications. IEEE Trans Robot. 2022;38(2):748–764.
33.
Gao C, Huang H, Li B, Jia G. Design of a truss-shaped deployable grasping mechanism using mobility bifurcation. Mech Mach Theory. 2019;139:346–358.
34.
Dai JS, Jones JR. Mobility in metamorphic mechanisms of foldable/erectable kinds. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the ASME 1998 Design Engineering Technical Conferences; 1998 Sep 13–16; Atlanta, GA.
35.
Xu K, Li L, Bai S, Yang Q, Ding X. Design and analysis of a metamorphic mechanism cell for multistage orderly deployable/retractable mechanism. Mech Mach Theory. 2017;111:85–98.
36.
Tian Y, Zhang D, Yao Y, Kong X, Li Y. A reconfigurable multi-mode mobile parallel robot. Mech Mach Theory. 2017;111:39–65.
37.
Tang Z, Wang K, Spyrakos-Papastavridis E, Dai JS. Origaker: A novel multi-mimicry quadruped robot based on a metamorphic mechanism. J Mech Robot. 2022;14(6):Article 060907.
Year 2023 volume 6 Issue 5
PDF
47
27
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.34133/research.0133
  • Receive Date:2022-11-19
  • Online Date:2026-10-28
  • Published:2023-05-20
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2022-11-19
  • Accepted:2023-04-11
Affiliations
    1School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518052, P.R. China.
    2Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Intelligent Morphing Mechanisms and Adaptive Robotics, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518052, P. R. China.
    3State Key Laboratory of Robotics and System, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, P.R. China.

Corresponding:

* Address correspondence to:
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/research/EN/10.34133/research.0133
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT